chabot-las positas community college district request for qualifications … · 2019-02-08 ·...

CHABOT-LAS POSITAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

RFQ No.: K-19

NEW BASEBALL FIELD PROJECT CHABOT COLLEGE

Proposal Due:

February 27, 2019 at 4:00 P.M.

Return RFP To: District Office

Facilities/Bond Programs and Operations 7600 Dublin Blvd., 3rd Floor

Dublin, California 94568

Chabot-Las Positas Community College District

Request for Qualifications No K-19 New Baseball Field Project, Chabot College | 1

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS DESIGN-BUILD SERVICES

RFQ #K-19, NEW BASEBALL FIELD PROJECT, CHABOT COLLEGE

OVERVIEW GUIDELINES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Trustees of the Chabot-Las Positas Community College District, State of California, hereby calls for qualified persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, associations, or professional organizations to provide full design-build services, Preconstruction and Construction Services, for the New Baseball Field Project, Chabot College. (“Project”). Respondent to this Request for Qualifications (“RFQ”) shall deliver one (1) original and three (3) bound copies and one (1) electronic copy, to:

Bond Buyer, Facilities/Bond Programs and Operations Department, Chabot-Las Positas Community College District

7600 Dublin Blvd., 3rd Floor Dublin, California 94568

until February 27, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. at which time and place said proposals will be examined. Faxed or emailed proposals will not be accepted. Request for Qualifications will be available on the Chabot-Las Positas Community College Facilities website at http://www.clpccd.org/bond/BiddingProjectBusinessOpportunitiesRFB.php (Adobe Reader is required for downloading document) Inquiries regarding this proposal should be directed to the Facilities/Bond Programs and Operations Department, Cindy Fracisco, Bond Buyer, e-mail at [email protected]. Reference RFP No. K-19 and project name on all inquiries concerning this RFQ. Request for Qualifications shall be evaluated in accordance with the evaluation factors outlined in this RFQ, and the (3) three highest scoring Respondents shall be invited to participate in Phase 2 – Request for Proposals. No contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. The Board of Trustees reserves the right to reject any and all bids and any and all items of such bids. This bid shall also be subject to any and all applicable laws, regulations and standards. This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. For more information, please refer to the Facilities Measure A Program Website at http://www.clpccd.org/bond/BiddingProjectBusinessOpportunitiesRev.php

http://www.clpccd.org/bond/BiddingProjectBusinessOpportunitiesRFB.php

http://www.clpccd.org/bond/BiddingProjectBusinessOpportunitiesRev.php


Request for Qualifications No K-19 | 2 New Baseball Field Project, Chabot College


REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (“RFQ”) NO. K-19 DESIGN-BUILD SERVICES

FOR NEW BASEBALL FIELD PROJECT, CHABOT COLLEGE




REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (“RFQ”)

FOR NEW BASEBALL FIELD PROJECT, CHABOT COLLEGE

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chabot-Las Positas Community College District (“District”) Board of Trustees invites Design-Build Entities (hereinafter “DBE” or “Respondents”) to submit the Pre-Qualification Questionnaire and other information required by this RFQ for the design and construction of the New Baseball Field Project, Chabot College (“Project”) on the District’s Chabot College Campus located at 25555 Hesperian Boulevard Hayward, CA 94545.

1. Request for Qualifications.

1.1. General.

1.1.1. Purpose of RFQ. The purpose of this RFQ is for prospective DBEs to submit materials establishing qualifications to provide the work, labor, materials and services necessary to complete design and construction of the Project. This RFQ is the first phase of a two-phase competitive process for the District’s selection of a DBE to complete design and construction of the Project. The RFQ phase consists of a screening and ranking process to establish a “short-list” of pre-qualified DBEs who will be invited to participate in the Request for Proposals (“RFP”) phase of the DBE selection process. Timely submitted and responsive RFQ Responses will be reviewed and scored by a Selection Committee based on the scoring criteria established in this RFQ. Following the Selection Committee’s determination of which Respondents meet or exceed the qualifications standards set forth in this RFQ, in the sole and exclusive discretion of the Selection Committee, the three (3) DBEs with the highest scored RFQ responses will be invited by the District to the RFP Phase.

1.1.2. Design-Build Approach. For this Project, the District is utilizing a Best Value, Guaranteed Maximum Not to Exceed, design-build procurement method under the California Education Code §81703. Pursuant to Education Code §81700 et seq., the District intends to contract with a DBE to complete the Design Documents, obtain all necessary permits/approvals for construction of the Project, and construct the Project.

1.2. Obtaining RFQ. This RFQ will be made available on the Chabot-Las Positas Community College Facilities website at http://www.clpccd.org/bond/BiddingProjectBusinessOpportunitiesRFB.php, labeled as - RFQ No. K-19, New Baseball Field Project, Chabot College.

1.3. District RFQ Contact. Questions or other communications relating to this RFQ shall be directed in writing to the District at:

Chabot Los Positas Community College District Attention: Cindy Fracisco, Bond Buyer 7600 Dublin Boulevard, 3rd Floor Dublin, California 94568 [email protected]

The District shall not be obligated to answer any questions received after the specified deadline or any questions submitted in a manner other than instructed above.

1.4. District Modifications to RFQ. The District expressly reserves the right to modify any portion

http://www.clpccd.org/bond/BiddingProjectBusinessOpportunitiesRFB.php

mailto:[email protected]



of this RFQ prior to the latest date/time for submission of RFQ Responses, including without limitation, the cancellation of this RFQ. Modifications, if any, made by the District to the RFQ will be in writing; potential Respondents who have obtained this RFQ from the District prior to any such modifications will be issued modifications to the RFQ by written addenda. All addenda issued by or on behalf of the District shall become part of the RFQ. Addenda will be distributed only to the Respondents who have obtained the RFQ from the District’s RFQ Contract pursuant to Paragraph 1.2 above.

1.5. No Oral Clarifications/Modifications. The District will not provide any oral clarifications or modifications to the RFQ or the requirements hereof; no employee, officer, agent or representative of the District is authorized to provide oral clarifications or modifications to the RFQ. No Respondent shall rely on any oral clarification or modification to the RFQ.

1.6. Unauthorized Communications. Unless and except when requested to do so in writing by the District or as otherwise permitted by this RFQ, Respondents (including, without limitation, members of the DBE, Sub-Consultants and Subcontractors) shall not, prior to completion of the RFQ, communicate, either verbally or in writing, with: (i) any member of the RFQ Selection Committee; (ii) any consultant or professional retained by the District for the purpose of providing the District advice or professional services in respect to the Project or the RFQ; or (iii) any employee or representative of the Chabot-Las Positas Community College District.

1.7. Project References: The District reserves the right, but assumes no obligation, to contact and interview any persons or organizations identified in Applicant’s Pre-Qualification Submittal, including, without limitation, Project References. Applicant assumes sole responsibility for any inaccuracies in the contact information provided by it. Incorrect contact Information for a Project Reference provided in response to a request in the Pre-Qualification Questionnaire may, in the sole and absolute discretion of District, result in the Project Reference being stricken.

1.8. Public Records. All materials submitted in response to the RFQ are deemed property of the District upon submission to the District. Responses to the RFQ and other materials submitted in connection therewith shall be deemed “public records” except for those marked or noted by a Respondent as “trade secrets” (as that term is defined and used in Civil Code §3426.1), “confidential” or “proprietary.” Financial statements are not subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. The foregoing notwithstanding, the District may reject for non-responsiveness a Response to the RFQ which indiscriminately notes that the Response or portions thereof are “Trade Secret,” “Confidential,” or “Proprietary” and exempt from disclosure as a public record. Notwithstanding the designation of materials submitted in response to the RFQ as “public records” such materials shall not be subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act until after: (i) conclusion of negotiations between the District and Respondent(s) concerning RFQ Responses and/or the terms, conditions and covenants of the DBE Contract; and (ii) a decision is made as to the Respondent to whom District staff will recommend to the District’s Board of Trustees for award of the DBE Contract. The District is not liable or responsible for the disclosure of RFQ Responses, or portions thereof, deemed to be public records, including those exempt from disclosure if disclosure is required by law, by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction, or which occurs through inadvertence, mistake or negligence on the part of the District or its agents or representatives. If the District is required to defend or otherwise respond to any action or proceeding wherein request is made for the disclosure of the contents of any portion of a RFQ Response deemed exempt from disclosure hereunder, by submitting a RFQ Response, each Respondent agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the District in any action or proceeding from and against any liability, including without limitation attorneys’ fees arising therefrom. The party submitting materials sought by any other party shall be solely responsible for the cost and defense in any action or proceeding seeking to compel disclosure of such materials; the District’s sole



involvement in any such action shall be that of a disinterested stakeholder, retaining the requested materials until otherwise ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction.

1.9. Errors/Discrepancies/Clarifications to RFQ. If a Respondent encounters errors or discrepancies in this RFQ or portions hereof, the Respondent shall immediately notify the District RFQ Contact of such error or discrepancy. Any Respondent seeking clarification of any portion of this RFQ shall submit the requested clarification in writing to the District RFQ Contact. Responses of the District to any requested clarification will be in writing; if in the sole judgment of the District, any clarification response affects the RFQ or other Respondents, the District will issue the clarification response by a written addendum distributed to all potential Respondents who have theretofore obtained this RFQ from the District. All requests for clarification of this RFQ must be submitted and actually received by the District no later than 4:00 PM ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2019; the District will not respond to clarification requests submitted thereafter. All communications to the District shall be as set forth in Paragraph 1.3 above.

1.10. Continuing Obligation. Each Respondent is under a continuing obligation, commencing upon submission of its RFQ Response, to immediately notify the District, in writing, if it learns that any of the following have occurred: (i) any statement made in any portion of its RFQ Response was false, misleading or omits material facts rendering any statement in its RFQ Response to be false or misleading; (ii) circumstances have occurred since the Respondent submitted its RFQ Response that, if they had occurred prior to the date that the Respondent submitted its RFQ Response, would have required the disclosure of such circumstances; or (iii) the Respondent has undergone a change in ownership in which ownership of fifty percent (50%) of more of its stock, ownership equity or assets has changed.

1.11. No Commitment to Award DBE Contract; District Reservation of Rights. Issuance of this RFQ and the District’s receipt or review of RFQ Responses does not commit the District to award of the DBE Contract. The District expressly reserves the right to modify the due date for RFQ Responses, RFQ requirements or action to award the DBE Contract in the sole and exclusive discretion of the District. Responses to the Design-Build Services Pre-Qualification Application (“Pre-Qualification Questionnaire”), Attachment A to this RFQ, including information about current bonding capacity, notarized statement from surety, and the most recent reviewed or audited financial statements, with accompanying notes and supplemental information, are required. The District will use these materials as the basis of rating the Respondents. The District reserves the right to check other sources available. The District’s decision will be based on objective evaluation criteria. The District reserves the right to waive minor irregularities in the RFQ Responses.

1.12. Notice of Appeal and Hearing. A Respondent who timely submits an RFQ Response that is not one (1) of the three (3) highest scored RFQ Responses may appeal its RFQ Response score (“RFQ Appeal”) by strict compliance with the following. RFQ Appeals must be in writing and must be submitted to the District RFQ Contact identified in Paragraph 1.2 above by 4:00 PM on the fifth (5th) calendar day after the date of the District’s notice to such Respondent of its failure to achieve the “short-listed” status. The RFQ Appeal must include: (i) all factual basis for the RFQ Appeal; (ii) all evidentiary materials supporting the factual basis for the RFQ Appeal; and (iii) all legal authority supporting the RFQ Appeal. If a Respondent timely submits a RFQ Appeal strictly conforming to the foregoing, the District will schedule a RFQ Appeal Hearing within ten (10) days of the date of submittal of a RFQ Appeal; the District will endeavor to schedule the RFQ Appeal Hearing upon mutual agreement with the Respondent submitting the RFQ Appeal, but the District expressly reserves the right to unilaterally schedule the RFQ Appeal Hearing. The RFQ Appeal Hearing is an informal process conducted by a panel of District employees or District consultants authorized by the District to conduct the RFQ Appeal Hearing and to render a decision on behalf of the District to a RFQ Appeal. The Respondent submitting a RFQ Appeal will be afforded the opportunity to present



witnesses and evidentiary materials supporting the RFQ Appeal. Witnesses presented by the Respondent submitting a RFQ Response will be required to testify under oath and are subject to cross-examination by the Appeal Panel. The Appeal Panel will issue rulings on RFQ Appeals in writing (“RFQ Appeal Decision”) within three (3) business days of the conclusion of a RFQ Appeals Hearing. RFQ Appeal Decisions constitute the District’s final administrative action a RFQ Appeal and not subject to further administrative review.

1.13. No Warranty by District. Respondents are solely responsible to satisfy themselves as to the suitability of any information provided by the District that is in the nature of estimates of costs, statements of needs or requirements, projections, budgets, or other information describing the proposed DBE Contract or Project contemplated by this RFQ. Nothing stated in this RFQ or any portion hereof shall be construed as implying the creation or existence of any warranty, express or implied, on the part of the District with respect to the accuracy, sufficiency or completeness of such information.

1.14. Informational Summaries. Portions of these RFQ Instructions include summaries of the process that the District currently contemplates for completion of the RFQ process. Such summaries are provided for the convenience of the Respondents and cannot be interpreted as a complete or definitive statement of all procedures, conditions, requirements or standards that may apply to any of the aforementioned processes. The District reserves the right, at any time and in the exercise of its sole and absolute discretion, to modify such procedures, conditions, requirements or standards, by changes, additions or deletions thereto.

1.15. RFQ and RFP Response Costs. All costs and expenses incurred by a Respondent to prepare and submit a response to this RFQ shall be borne solely and exclusively by the Respondent.

1.15.1. A Stipend will be paid to the short listed forms per the following:

First Place – Award of Contract for Design/Build Services

Second and Third Place - $10,000, that may be awarded by the District, in its sole discretion, to each responsive Design Build team that places second or third.

2. RFQ Documents. In addition to this RFQ, the following form a part of the RFQ:

Attachment A Design-Build Services Pre-Qualification Application Non-Collusion Affidavit Certification of Pre-Bid Site Visit

Attachment B Agreement for Design Build Services Attachment C Chabot College Campus Map Attachment D New Baseball Field Project Master Plan Base Scope Attachment E Project Schedule Attachment F Project Budget

3. The District and the Project.

3.1. The District. The Chabot-Las Positas Community College District was founded in 1961 and serves the San Francisco East Bay Area, particularly southern Alameda County, through its two colleges: Chabot College in Hayward and Las Positas College in Livermore. The colleges specialize in university transfer, technical training, continuing education, workforce development, contract education with local businesses and cultural enrichment. The district serves 24,500 students and employs more than 2,000 administrators, faculty and classified staff.

The Chabot College Athletic Department offers 16 intercollegiate sports for men and women, and Chabot Athletics prides itself in developing student-athletes to achieve skills in the pursuit of athletic competition and to excel in their academic pursuits. By participating in athletics, students can grow mentally, physically and to develop teamwork skills. Through quality



coaching and dedication, student-athletes achieve a successful transfer rate to four-year institutions where they can continue their academic and athletic careers.

A seven-member elected Board of Trustees sets policy for the District. The registered voters of the nine communities elect them from the following trustee areas: Castro Valley, Dublin, Hayward, Livermore, Pleasanton, San Leandro, San Lorenzo, Sunol, and Union City. The District has undertaken a major capital building program to implement the $950 million Measure A Bond Program approved by the voters in June 2016. The overriding goal of this program will be for construction, repair, modernization and expansion efforts are to expand the existing college campuses to meet the changing needs of students and the community.

3.2. Project Description. This Design Build Project constructs a new permanent state-of-the-art, baseball field in the present location of the existing baseball field. It is anticipated that the current baseball field orientation will be retained for an optimum playing experience. This is anticipated to be a year-round training and playing field and will promote the Chabot College Gladiator identity and strength.

The Project will consist of approximately:

Demolition of the existing Press box building, Three (3) Conex containers, existing tiered seating adjacent to the home and visitor infields, backstop netting with poles and foundations, existing storage rooms and restrooms, existing home and visitor dugouts, irrigation and site utilities, scoreboard signage and foundations, bull-pens, batting cages and foundations, hardscapes, and poles and fences in the backfield.

Baseball Field Site:

• Total site area is approximately 197,110 GSF

• 134,128 GSF of baseball playing field, dugouts, bull pen and outfield.

• 4,950 GSF Three (3) lane batting cage

Playing Field Structures:

It is anticipated that any permanent structures built would closely follow the material, color and texture precedent set by the structures at the Chabot College Women’s Softball Field.

• 900 GSF single story fully conditioned Press box building with the following program –

o Press box

o Tiered stadium style seating

o (2) public restrooms

o Custodial

o Electrical

o Telecom

• 500 GSF Single-story Storage building.

• (4) lane Home Bullpen and (2) lane Visitor Bullpen, both sized to NCAA dimensions

• (3) lane Batting Cage.

• (2) at grade Home and Visitor Dugouts.

• The existing berms adjacent to the home and visitor infields will be regraded and the existing cast in place concrete seating with aluminum benches will be demolished.

• Backstop, netting, and poles positioned to optimize spectator experience.



• New LED Scoreboard with static display.

• Fencing and gates to secure the baseball field facility.

• Outdoor storage areas for large movable equipment.

• Landscaping, walkways, and decorative concrete entry plaza with ornamental fencing

The District has identified the following Additive Alternates to the New Baseball Field Project, Chabot College:

• Add Alternate # 1

Addition of a fourth (4th) batting cage lane to the new Batting Cage facility

• Add Alternate # 2 –

Addition of a paved flat seating area with good spectator views at the berm adjacent to the Home infield. Include stairs and accessible ramp as required.

• Add Alternate # 3A –

Addition of approximately 1,767 GSF consisting of Team room and Coaches office to the Storage Building.

• Add Alternate # 3 B –

Addition of approximately 430 GSF consisting of Training room, Concessions, and Gender-neutral restroom to the Press Box Building.

The above square footages are current estimates and subject to change.

3.2.1. Project Budget. The District established an initial “Project Budget,” for the DBE’s costs for completing the Project Design Documents and construction of the project, at Five Million Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars ($5,800,000). The Project Budget is not inclusive of Owner’s Contingencies. See Attachment F for the Project Budget detail.

Project Schedule. The District anticipates awarding the Project to the successful Respondent no later than June 2019. The District anticipates the release and construction of the new baseball field and facilities beginning May 2020. The District understands the facilities will be unavailable for a baseball season which they can accommodate the athletic teams for a limited duration. The District plans to have a new baseball field and facility by March 2021. See attachment E for more details.

3.2.2. Design Build Criteria Documents Team. The District has retained HMC Architects (“the Consulting Architect”) to prepare the Performance (Criteria) Documents and to assist the District during the DBEs completion of Project design and construction. Information regarding Design Consultants is required to be submitted in Attachment A of the RFQ. Please note that the Consulting Architect preparing the Criteria documents, including the design sub-consultants listed below, are not eligible to be included on any design build entity teams for this Project:

• Verde Design, Inc. (Civil Engineer and Landscape Architect) • Walter P Moore (Structural Engineer) • McCracken and Woodman, Inc. (Mechanical and Plumbing Engineer) • Borrelli And Associates, Inc. (Electrical Engineer) • Charles Salters and Associates, Inc. (Audio-Visual and IT) • Kate Keating Associates, Inc. (Wayfinding and Signage) • Marcene Taylor, Inc. (Cost Estimation)



3.2.3. Bridging Documents. The Consulting Architect has prepared performance criteria documents and programming that includes the District’s standards for materials and equipment for this Project. These documents will be provided to the selected three (3) qualified DBEs as part of the RFP process. These documents will provide guidelines as to Space Programming with Adjacencies, which may be a “test fit” schematic floor and site plan drawing format. A geotechnical study has been completed for the site, and an existing site utilities plan will be a part of the Bridging Documents.

4. Entity Qualifications. The DBE will be an integral member of the Project Team, consisting of the DBE, District representatives, and other consultants as required. It will be the responsibility of the DBE to integrate the design and construction phases, utilizing skills and knowledge of design and general contracting to provide design, code analysis, value engineering and constructability reviews, develop schedules, prepare detailed project construction estimates, and, in any way deemed necessary, contribute to the development of the Project during the pre-construction/design phase. The DBE will have the following characteristics:

• Include a team member with a California General Building Contractor License, “B” classification, and a Public Works Contractor Registration through the Department of Industrial Relations.

• Have successful experience completing projects for Community College Districts and Higher Education Districts.

• Have successful experiences completing collegiate athletic facilities and fields where the fields were constructed with synthetic turf.

• Provide adequate staffing and resources to Project(s). Maintain key staff through the duration of Project(s).

• Have reasonable proximity to the City of Hayward in order to provide: (1) team working/review sessions during design; (2) ease of team coordination meetings; (3) minimal cost to attend District meetings; and (4) quick response to field issues.

• Have an established Quality Assurance/Quality Control program.

• Work collaboratively with District and District’s Authorized Representative.

• Be flexible in nature, with positive, can-do attitudes. Be solution-oriented; deadline driven.

• Be organized, effective and efficient. Exercise professional prioritization skills. Work easily with modern amenities like scanners and email.

• Be proactive. Be prepared, working in advance of deadlines. Be comfortable making in-field decisions, problem solving with engineers or experts via phone during critical times of construction.

• Be mindful and tenacious about maintaining project budgets and schedules, especially during construction. Make decisions that support District goals and objectives, relative to scope creep and especially contractor-initiated change orders.

• Articulately communicate potential issues early and often. Provide thoughtful recommendations where applicable.

5. RFQ Response.

5.1. RFQ Activities; Timeline. The following is a description of the principal activities to be completed under this RFQ and the timeline for completion of each activity. The following notwithstanding, the District expressly reserves the right to modify the extent, nature or scope of RFQ activities and/or the timeline for commencing/completing RFQ activities by issuance of



addenda reflecting such modification:

Activity Completion Date

RFQ Advertising (Published date) Wednesday, January 30, 2019 Wednesday, February 6, 2019

Bid Walk Monday, February 11, 2019, 10AM Wednesday, February 13, 2019, 10 AM

RFI Due to District 4:00 PM, Tuesday, February 19, 2019

Addendum Issued Friday, February 22, 2019

RFQ Due to Chabot-Las Positas CCD 4:00 PM, Wednesday, February 27, 2019

5.2. RFQ Responses.

5.2.1. Latest Date/Time for Submission of RFQ Response. The latest date/time for submission of RFQ Responses is set forth in Paragraph 5.1. RFQ Responses which are not actually received by the office of the Bond Buyer, Facilities/Bond Programs and Operations Department at or prior to the latest date/time for submission of RFQ Responses may be rejected by the District for non-responsiveness. Respondents are solely responsible for the timely submission of RFQ Responses. Respondents are advised that the receipt of items transmitted by United States Mail and private courier services, including FedEx, California Overnight, DHL, etc. are deemed received by the office of the Bond Buyer, Facilities/Bond Programs and Operations Department when delivery of such item is effectuated to:

Chabot-Las Positas Community College District Office

Attn: Cindy Fracisco

7600 Dublin Blvd., 3rd Floor

Dublin, CA 94568

Accordingly, Respondents are encouraged to personally deliver, or to retain a private service to personally deliver, RFQ Responses directly to the office of the Bond Buyer, Facilities/Bond Programs and Operations Department.

5.2.2. Submission of RFQ Response. RFQ Responses shall be enclosed and sealed in an envelope or container bearing the title of the Project, RFQ No. K-19, and the name of the Respondent.

EMAIL OR FAXED REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. It is the Respondent’s responsibility to verify that the Respondent’s RFQ Response has been received by the District prior to the latest date/time for submissions. Verification of receipt can be made emailing [email protected].

5.3. Respondent Questions; Clarification Requests. Respondents’ questions or clarification requests regarding this RFQ must be in writing to the Project Manager, Facilities/Bond Program, and must be received by the District RFQ Contact no later than 4:00 P.M. (PST) February 19, 2019. Written questions may be emailed to the District RFQ Contact [email protected] . The project title, RFQ K-19, must be referenced in the subject line of emailed questions. The District shall not be obligated to answer any questions received after the above-specified deadline or any questions submitted in a manner other than as set forth





above. The District will respond to timely submitted questions in writing. The District’s response(s) to a Respondent’s question(s) will be in the form of an addendum. The District will issue an addendum which will be emailed to all participants and posted on the District website under the applicable project name and number.

5.4. RFQ Response Contents/Format.

5.4.1. RFQ Response. All materials submitted in response to this RFQ shall be on 8 ½” x 11” paper, preferably in portrait orientation, 12 point (or larger) Arial, Calibri or Times New Roman font with 1” page margins on all sides. Mistakes may be crossed out and corrections made adjacent, however, each correction must be initialed by the person signing the Design-Build Services Pre-Qualification Application. All submitted materials must be bound in either a three-ring binder or spiral bound notebook. Tabbed dividers should be used to identify and separate discrete sections of the RFQ Response which correspond to the RFQ Response Format described in Paragraph 5.5 below.

The total submittal length shall not exceed thirty-five (35), one-sided pages. 5.4.2. Additional Materials. Respondents are not prohibited, but are discouraged from

submitting materials in addition to those specifically responding to the matters noted in Paragraph 5.5 below. If a Respondent elects to submit materials with its RFQ Response which are in addition to the matters described in Paragraph 5.5 below, the Respondent shall separately bind all such additional materials from the RFQ Response addressing the matters set forth in Paragraph 5.5.

5.4.3. Copies of RFQ Response. Each Respondent shall submit one (1) complete electronic version on a flash drive, one (1) original and three (3) copies of their respective RFQ Responses. The electronic copy shall be in PDF or read-only Word document.

5.5. RFQ Response Format/Contents. Each RFQ Response must conform to the following described format and must include the content described below. Failure of a Respondent to submit its RFQ Response in a format and with content conforming to the following requirements will be a basis for the District’s rejection of such RFQ Response for non-responsiveness.

5.5.1. Cover Sheet. Identify the submittal utilizing a Cover Sheet stating the following, “Statement of Qualifications for [FIRM NAME] in Response to Chabot-Las Positas RFQ #K-19” and an identification of the DBE submitting the RFQ Response along with the DBE’s address, telephone/fax numbers, and email addresses of the DBE’s principal contacts in connection with this RFQ or the RFQ Response.

• Acknowledgement of Addendum: The Bidder confirms that this Bid Proposal incorporates and is inclusive of, all items or other matters contained in Bid Addenda issued by or on behalf of the District. Locate as the final statement on the Cover Sheet the acknowledgement of addendum using the following language:

_____ Addenda Nos. _________________ received, acknowledged (initial) and incorporated into this Bid Proposal.

• The RFQ must be submitted with Certification of Pre-Bid Site Visit, which shall be executed by an individual duly authorized to execute the same on behalf of the Bidder.

5.5.2. Letter of Interest. (maximum 1 page) Include a brief letter expressing the interest of the Respondent in providing design and construction services under one contract with the District and a brief statement of the qualifications of the Respondent to



complete Design-Build services for the Project. Provide contact information, including the telephone number, fax number and email address for the personnel of the Respondent who will be receiving notices and other communications from the District regarding the RFQ. The letter of interest should be bound with other materials responding to this RFQ.

5.5.3. Table of Contents. Include a Table of Contents reflecting each of the following sections of the RFQ Response:

• Tab 1: Pre-Qualification Application Questionnaire. Each Respondent must complete the Design-Build Services Pre-Qualification Application (“Pre-Qualification Questionnaire”), Attachment A to this RFQ. The District’s Selection Committee will evaluate and score each Pre-Qualification Questionnaire for completeness; conformance to project requirements; history of violations, claims, arbitration and/or litigation; and other requirements. Pre-Qualification Applications must be signed under penalty of perjury in the manner designated at the end of the Pre-Qualification Application, by an individual who has the legal authority to bind the Respondent on whose behalf that person is signing. If any information provided by a Respondent becomes inaccurate, the Respondent must immediately notify the District and provide updated accurate information in writing, under penalty of perjury. (This section does not affect page limit of the RFQ Response.)

• Tab 2: Relevant Project Experience. Provide additional information on the design and construction profiles of the projects identified in the Pre-Qualification Application. Clearly identify the relevance of each project and address relevance to the proposed Project.

The projects identified should demonstrate the DBE’s design and construction experience in projects of similar size and scope, and complexity as the proposed Project, should have been completed in the education construction sector preferably in higher education however K-12 will be acceptable, completed within the past (10) ten years, and had success with the Division of State Architects.

Include specific experiences in delivering projects under a design-build project delivery method. Include in the discussion of the experience of the Respondent and its proposed Architect of Record (“AOR”) and Design Consultants to the AOR for the following: (i) conformity to schedule and budget requirements; (ii) narrative of design approach and construction experience (iii) if the Respondent and proposed AOR worked on the same project, (iv) utilization of value engineering and cost control techniques, (v) salient features and discuss how the client’s program, mission, and operational objects were satisfied by the overall design and planning solution.

• Tab 3: Proposed Project Team. Identify the key members of the Respondents’ staff that will be assigned to the design and construction phases of the Project. Identify the Respondents’ proposed AOR and General Contractor, as well as a Mechanical Engineer, Structural Engineer, Electrical Engineer, Civil Engineer, Landscape Architect, and Sports Field Design Consultants to the AOR and/or DBE.

For the AOR and General Contractor, and each Design Consultant identified by the Respondent, identify the key members of their staff that will be assigned to the design or construction phases of the Project. Identify each person proposed as part of the Design Team and indicate whether such proposed personnel are employees of the Respondent, an employee of a Sub-Consultant to the Respondent or an independent contractor to the Respondent. For each member of the Respondents’ organization and for each member of AOR and Design



Consultants identified, provide brief descriptions of the relevant qualifications, including DBIA Certified Professional certificates, background, and any project team members that have previously worked as members of an integrated team.

Include a matrix indicating which proposed personnel have worked together before on the indicated Relevant Projects Experience section. Include an organization chart illustrating the relationships among the Respondent’s proposed Project Team.

Do not include resumes for the proposed personnel of the Respondent, AOR and proposed Design Consultants under Tab 3; personnel resumes are to be bound and incorporated into Tab 4 (Personnel Resumes) section of the RFQ Response.

• Tab 4: Project Personnel Resumes. Provide a current resume for each member of the Respondent’s personnel and for each member of the personnel of the AOR and each Design Consultant identified in Tab 3, Proposed Project Team. (This section does not affect page limit of the RFQ Response.)

• Tab 5: Project Approach. Provide a narrative of the Respondent’s approach and methodology to completing tasks necessary to complete the design-construct of the Project set forth in Section 3.2 Project Description and as shown in Attachment D. Include a detailed description and discussion of measures the Respondent utilizes for quality assurance and quality control of Design Documents, for minimizing errors or omissions, and for completing construction of the Project within the District’s schedule and budget. Include any control systems for planning, scheduling, and cost management.

Discuss the Respondent’s philosophy and design intent as related to the project. Include topics as the parameters that may apply in creating a high-performing and best value baseball field and associated athletics facilities. Discuss the Respondent’s management process that will be applied to this Project and the approach to design build. Include how the Respondent will manage communication, decision-making, interaction with sub-consultants and District’s representatives, and means to integrate client and community input.

• Tab 6: Financial Statement. Respondent to include a current financial statement for 2018 CY or 2017/2018 FY (This section does not affect page limit of the RFQ Response.)

• Tab 7: Insurance Certificates. Provide copies of Certificates of Insurance for the Respondent and its proposed AOR and Design Consultants. Required Certificates of Insurance and minimum coverage amounts for each policy of insurance are as set forth below. The District reserves the right to modify the minimum coverage limits for each policy of insurance on the Project. (This section does not affect page limit of the RFQ Response.) Insurance Requirements for Contractor: Minimum coverage amounts for each policy of insurance required of the Contractor shall be as follows:

Workers Compensation Insurance In accordance with applicable law

Employers Liability Insurance $1,000,000

Commercial General Liability Insurance (including coverage for bodily injury, death, property damage and motor vehicle liability)

Per Occurrence - $2,000,000

Aggregate - $4,000,000



Builder’s Risk Full value of the Work; seismic coverage is not required

Insurance Requirements for Subcontractors: Minimum coverage amounts for each policy of insurance to be obtained and maintained by each Subcontractor to the Contractor shall be as follows:

Workers Compensation Insurance In accordance with applicable law

Employers Liability Insurance $1,000,000

Commercial General Liability Insurance (including coverage for bodily injury, death, property damage and motor vehicle liability)

Per Occurrence - $1,000,000

Aggregate - $2,000,000

Insurance Requirements for Architects and Designers:

A. General Liability: Two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

B. Automobile Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

C. Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease.

D. Professional Liability: Architect/Engineer shall provide insurance covering the prime design professional and his/her subconsultant(s) for one million dollars ($1,000,000) aggregate limit subject to no more than seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) per claim deductible, coverage to continue through substantial completion of construction plus two years thereafter.

E. Excess/Umbrella Liability: Three million dollars ($3,000,000) per occurrence.

Other Insurance Provisions: The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1. The District, the Construction Manager, their representatives, consultants, trustees, officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers (“Additional Insureds”) are to be covered as additional insureds as respects liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Architect/Engineer; instruments of service and completed operations of the Architect/Engineer; premises owned, occupied or used by the Architect/Engineer; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Architect/Engineer. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the Additional Insureds.

• Tab 8: Safety Record. Include submission of evidence that establishes the DBE has an acceptable safety record. For purposes of this RFQ, an “acceptable safety record” is a Workers Compensation Insurance experience (EMR) for the most recent three (3) year period that is an average of 1.0 or less, and an average total recordable injury or illness rate and average lost work rate for the most three (3) year period does not exceed the applicable statistical standards for the construction industry. If the DBE’s EMR for the most recent three (3) year period exceeds an average of 1.0, the DBEs acceptable to the District will be scored “0”.

• Tab 9: Geographic Location of Home Office. Include submission of evidence that



establishes that DBE has a current home office nearest the Chabot College campus location, ideally in either Contra Costa County, Alameda County, or Santa Clara County although it is not required to have an office in these counties. For Respondents who conduct business from multiple office locations, the “home office” for purposes of this RFQ is the Respondent’s regional office serving the San Francisco/Hayward/San Jose geographic area.

6. RFQ Evaluations.

6.1. General. Timely submitted RFQ Responses will be reviewed for responsiveness and independently evaluated by each member of the Selection Committee. A Response to the RFQ which does not comply with the requirements of this RFQ will be subject to rejection for non-responsiveness.

6.2. District Policy. It is the policy of the District that the selection of firms to provide professional services in connection with construction projects of the District be based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications to complete the required professional services at a fair and reasonable price to the District.

6.3. Initial Evaluation Criteria; Short List. The following sets forth the criteria by which each RFQ Response will be evaluated and the relative weight of each evaluation criteria.

6.3.1. Pre-Qualification Application. DBEs must submit the Pre-Qualification Application as described in Design-Build Services Qualification Application attached as Exhibit A to this RFQ for an Architect and General Contractor, as well as a Mechanical Engineer, Structural Engineer, Electrical Engineer, Civil Engineer, Landscape Architect, and Sports Field Designer. The Selection Committee will evaluate for completeness; conformance to project requirements; history of violations, claim, arbitration and/or litigation and other requirements.

6.3.2. Relevant Experience and Ability. The initial standard is met when the Respondent provides at least (3) projects that address the requested submittal requirements Respondent’s profiles of relevant projects will be evaluated based on how similar in size, scope, use, and complexity the projects are to the proposed Project subject to this RFQ. The relevant experience and ability will be evaluated in accordance with the following criteria

• Completed for a California Community College District,

• Successful experience with DSA,

• Demonstrated Respondent involvement in the planning, design, and construction administration of sports fields and sports facilities within the last ten (10) years,

• Completed on time and within budget,

• Demonstrated high relevance to the proposed Project.

• Successfully utilized value engineering for the benefit of the Owner and implemented construction cost reduction measures,

• Were successfully delivered by design build method,

• Obtained certificate, award, or recognition demonstrating design and/or construction excellence.

6.3.3. Proposed Project Team. The skills, experience, and capabilities of the respondent and its proposed Project Team will be evaluated. The standard is met if the Respondent identified 1) Key members of the Respondents’ staff that will be



assigned to design and construction phases of the Projects identified; and the Respondent identified 2) Architect, Mechanical Engineer, Structural Engineer, Electrical Engineer, Civil Engineer, Landscape Architect, and Sports Field Designer. Favorable consideration may be given if the Respondent included 1) brief descriptions of the relevant qualifications and background 2) a matrix of any like projects team members has previously worked as members of an integrated team; 3) and an organization chart illustrating the relationships among the Respondent’s proposed Project Team. Further favorable considerations may be given if the Proposed Project Team achieves any of the criteria set forth:

• The Design Team has a track record of delivering superior quality and demonstrated consistently high level of exploration, rigor, and personal commitment to an excellent design.

• The Design Team demonstrated a history of dedication to clients.

• Ability to develop effective working relationships with Owners, Owner’s Representative, key management personnel and other consultants.

• Acceptable and verifiable references from clients contacted by the District, including Key members’ firms reputation, satisfaction of previous clients, timeliness of work and adherence to client’s schedule.

6.3.4. Project Personnel Resumes. Current resume for each member of the Respondent’s personnel and for each member of the personnel of the Architect and each Design Consultants provided.

6.3.5. Project Approach. The Respondent provided a narrative discussing their ability and commitment to develop and implement high-quality, functional, cost-effective and aesthetically attractive designs for the Project anticipated to be completed under this RFQ. The standard is met if the Respondent demonstrated their philosophy and design intent is suitable for this project and there is satisfactory probability that the Respondent’s management process will result in a collaborative team effort. Further favorable considerations may be given if the Respondent achieves any of the criteria set forth:

• Clear demonstration and defined compatible values and philosophy,

• Proven and successful implementation of the Respondent’s management process on any of the projects listed under Relevant Experience and Ability,

• A patented process or unique product which the Respondent intends to rely on in performing the project which adds additional value to the project.

6.3.6. Financial Statement. Provide current financial statement.

6.3.7. Insurance Certificates. Copies of Certificates of Insurance and minimum coverage amounts for each policy of insurance as set forth above in Section 5.5.3.7 for the Respondent and its proposed Architect and Design Consultants.

6.3.8. Safety Record. Evidence of an acceptable safety record of an average of 1.0 or less experience modification rating (EMR) for the most recent three (3) year period is provided.



6.3.9. Scoring. The Selection Committee will determine the three (3) highest rated DBEs using the scoring method described below.

Tab No. Description Maximum Score

Weighted Value

Total Points

Tab 1: DBE Pre-Qualification Application

A. General Contractor 5 1 5 B. Architect 5 1 5 C. Mechanical Engineer 5 1 5 D. Structural Engineer 5 1 5 E. Electrical Engineer 5 1 5 F. Civil Engineer 5 1 5 G. Landscape Architect 5 1 5 H. Sports Field Designer 5 1 5

Tab 2: Relevant Project Experience

A. Sports Facilities & Fields 5 5 25 B. Community College and Higher Education

5 4 20

C. Projects under DSA jurisdiction

5 3 15

Tab 3: Proposed Project Team

5 6 30

Tab 4: Project Personnel Resumes

5 1 5 At least (1) DBIA Certified Professional

5 1 5

Tab 5: Project Approach

5 3 15

Tab 6: Financial Statement

5 1 5

Tab 7: Insurance Certificates

5 1 5

Tab 8: Safety Record

5 1 5

Total Maximum Points 170

Each Selection Committee Member will evaluate and assess the Total Points scored on the RFQ (“Total Points”), and the Total Points will be averaged by the number of Selection Committee Members (“Average Points”). Each Respondent’s Final Score will be determined using the following formula: (Average Points x 100) ÷ Total Maximum points = Final Score. In event of a 3rd place tie, the Respondent with the greatest sum of points under “Proposed Project Team” will be short-listed to the next phase.

6.4. Short List Evaluation. The District will issue an RFP based upon the Selection Committee’s recommendations of the three (3) highest scoring DBEs from the RFQ process.

[END OF SECTION]


Request for Qualifications No. K-19 P a g e | 18 New Baseball Field Project, Chabot College Attachment A; Pre-Qualification Application

DESIGN-BUILD SERVICES PRE-QUALIFICATION APPLICATION

(Attachment A) 1. DESIGN-BUILD ENTITY (“DBE”)

1.1. DBE. Complete the following for the DBE (the firm or entity who will enter into the Design-Build Contract with the District for completing design and construction of the Project.)

DBE Name

DBE Office Address _________________________________________ (Street Address)

_________________________________________ (City, State and Zip Code)

DBE Mailing Address (if different from office address) _________________________________________

(Street Address)


DBE Telephone/Fax (____) ______________ (____) ______________ (Telephone) (Fax)

DBE Contractors’ License ___________ ____________ ______________ (License Number) (Classification(s) (Expiration Date)

DBE DIR Contractor Registration ______________ (Registration Number)

1.2. DBE Contact Information. Complete the following for the DBE contact person for RFQ communications.

DBE Contact Person Name

DBE Contact Person Address _________________________________________ (Street Address)


DBE Contact Person Telephone/Cell Phone (____) ______________ (____) ______________

(Telephone) (Cell Phone) DBE Contact Person Email __________________________________

(Email Address)

1.3. DBE Form of Entity. Check appropriate box describing DBE form of entity. � Corporation _________________________________________________

(State of Incorporation & Corporate Registration No.) � Partnership _________________________________________________

(Describe type of partnership i.e., general partnership, limited partnership) � Limited Liability Company

� Limited Liability Partnership



� Joint Venture ________________________________________________ (Identify each member of Joint Venture and form of entity of each Joint Venturer)

� Sole Proprietorship _____________________________________________ (Identify all equity owners)

1.4. DBE Members. Complete the following for the general contractor and architect of record (“AOR”) members of the DBE.

1.4.1. General Contractor. Complete the following for the general contractor member of the DBE.

General Contractor Name

General Contractor Mailing Address _____________________________________

(Street Address)

______________________________________ (City, State and Zip Code)

General Contractor Telephone/Fax (____) ____________ (____) ____________

(Telephone) (Fax) General Contractor Contractors’ License ___________ _________ ___________

(License Number) (Classification(s) (Expiration Date) General Contractor DIR Contractor Registration ______________

(Registration Number)

1.4.2. AOR. Complete the following for the AOR member of the DBE.

AOR Name

AOR Mailing Address ______________________________________ (Street Address)


AOR Telephone/Fax (___) _____________ (___) ______________ (Telephone) (Fax)

1.4.3. AOR Licensed Personnel. Complete the following for personnel of the AOR.

AOR Project Executive _____________________________________ Name

_____________________________________ (California Architect or Engineer License Number)

AOR Project Manager ______________________________________ Name

______________________________________ (California Architect or Engineer License Number)

AOR Design Phase Manager ______________________________________

Name




AOR Construction Phase Manager ______________________________________

Name


2. DBE PROPOSED PROJECT TEAM 2.1. Proposed Design Professionals. Complete the following for the proposed design professional

members of the DBE.

2.1.1. Structural Engineer. Complete the following for the proposed structural engineer.

Structural Engineer Firm Name

Structural Engineer Mailing Address _____________________________________

(Street Address)


Structural Engineer Telephone/Fax (____) ____________ (____) ____________

(Telephone) (Fax) Structural Engineer Project Executive ______________________________________

Name


Structural Engineer Project Manager ______________________________________

Name


Structural Engineer Design Phase Manager ______________________________________

Name


Structural Engineer Construction Phase Manager

______________________________________ Name


2.1.2. Mechanical Engineer. Complete the following for the proposed mechanical engineer.

Mechanical Engineer Firm Name _____________________________________ Mechanical Engineer Mailing Address _____________________________________

(Street Address)


Mechanical Engineer Telephone/Fax (____) ____________ (____) ____________

(Telephone) (Fax) Mechanical Engineer ______________________________________



Project Executive Name


Mechanical Engineer Project Manager ______________________________________

Name


Mechanical Engineer Design Phase Manager ______________________________________

Name


Mechanical Engineer Construction Phase Manager

______________________________________ Name


2.1.3. Electrical Engineer. Complete the following for the proposed electrical engineer.

Electrical Engineer Firm Name _____________________________________ Electrical Engineer Mailing Address _____________________________________

(Street Address)


Electrical Engineer Telephone/Fax (____) ____________ (____) ____________

(Telephone) (Fax) Electrical Engineer Project Executive ______________________________________

Name


Electrical Engineer Project Manager ______________________________________

Name


Electrical Engineer Design Phase Manager ______________________________________

Name


Electrical Engineer Construction Phase Manager

______________________________________ Name


2.1.4. Plumbing Engineer. Complete the following for the proposed civil engineer.

Civil Engineer Firm Name



Civil Engineer Mailing Address _____________________________________

(Street Address)


Civil Engineer Telephone/Fax (____) ____________ (____) ____________

(Telephone) (Fax) Civil Engineer Project Executive ______________________________________

Name


Civil Engineer Project Manager ______________________________________

Name


Civil Engineer Design Phase Manager ______________________________________

Name


Civil Engineer Construction Phase Manager ______________________________________

Name


2.1.5. Landscape Architect. Complete the following for the proposed landscape architect.

Landscape Architect Firm Name _____________________________________ Landscape Architect Mailing Address _____________________________________

(Street Address)


Landscape Architect Telephone/Fax (____) ____________ (____) ____________

(Telephone) (Fax) Landscape Architect Project Executive ______________________________________

Name


Landscape Architect Project Manager ______________________________________

Name




Landscape Architect Design Phase Manager ______________________________________

Name


Landscape Architect Construction Phase Manager

______________________________________ Name


2.1.6. Sports Field Designer. Complete the following for the proposed landscape architect.

Sports Field Designer Firm Name

Sports Field Designer Mailing Address _____________________________________

(Street Address)


Sports Field Designer Telephone/Fax (____) ____________ (____) ____________

(Telephone) (Fax) Sports Field Designer Project Executive ______________________________________

Name


Sports Field Designer Project Manager ______________________________________

Name


Sports Field Designer Design Phase Manager ______________________________________

Name


Sports Field Designer Construction Phase Manager

______________________________________ Name


2.2. Proposed Trade Contractors. Complete the following for proposed trade contractors for construction of a portion of the Project. Trade Contractors identified by the DBE in the following is for information only. DBEs invited to participate in the RFP phase for selection of the DBE will be required to submit a Subcontractors List for all subcontractors to the DBE that will be performing work valued at or more than one-half of one percent (0.05%) of the Construction Costs portion of the Contract Price under the DBE Contract. The District reserves the right to require that the proposed trade contractors for: (i) structural; (ii) earthwork/civil work; (iii) electrical (line voltage and low voltage); (iv) mechanical; (v) plumbing; (vi) landscape architect and (vii) artificial field turf installer be pre-qualified in the RFP phase.



2.2.1. Structural; Concrete.

Contractor Name

Contractor Mailing Address _____________________________________ (Street Address)


Contractor Telephone/Fax (____) ____________ (____) ____________ (Telephone) (Fax)

Contractors’ License ___________ _________ ___________ (License Number) (Classification(s) (Expiration Date)

DIR Contractor Registration ______________


2.2.2. Structural; Steel.

Contractor Name Contractor Mailing Address _____________________________________

(Street Address)






2.2.3. Concrete; Non-Structural.

Contractor Name







2.2.4. Earthwork.

Contractor Name









2.2.5. Mechanical.


(Street Address)






2.2.6. Electrical; Line Voltage.


(Street Address)






2.2.7. Electrical; Low Voltage.


(Street Address)








2.2.8. Plumbing.

Contractor Name







2.2.9. Roofing.


(Street Address)






2.2.10. Landscaping.


(Street Address)








2.2.11. Artificial Field Turf Builder.


(Street Address)








3. DBE Design-Build Experience. Provide a summary of the DBE’s prior project experience within the past ten (10) years for the following types of projects: (i) community college districts and higher education; and (ii) athletic facilities and sports fields; and (iii) design-build projects. The projects summarized for the foregoing types of project owners must be: (i) capital improvements; (ii) facilities renovation/modernization; and (iii) building systems/equipment upgrades or repairs. Project experience summaries must be provided using the following format; Respondents must duplicate the following form of project summary and attached completed project summaries to this Pre-Qualification Application; number each project summary sequentially, beginning with Assignment No. 1. This should be a minimum of three (3) and no more than five (5) projects.

ASSIGNMENT NO. Project Owner Name ______________________________________________

Project Owner Type Community College District K-12 Public School District Private Sector Non-Profit

Project Type Capital Improvement Renovation/Modernization Deferred/Scheduled Maintenance Building Systems/Building Equipment Upgrades/Repairs

Project Description ______________________________________________

Approximate Value of Respondent’s Design-Build Services

_______________________________ Dollars ($________)

Project Owner Contact Information Name: __________________________________

Title: __________________________________

Phone (____) ____________________________

Email __________________________________

DBE Team Members Contractor: _____________________________

AOR: _____________________________



4. Respondent Questionnaire. Each Respondent must answer the following questionnaire. 4.1. Years In Business. How many years has the Respondent provided construction, architectural

or design professional services under Respondent’s current trade/business name. ____________

4.2. Prior Trade/Business Name. Has the Respondent, in the prior ten (10) years conducted business under a trade name or business name that is different than the Respondent’s current trade/business name?

� Yes � No If “Yes” identify all trade/business names used by Respondent in the prior ten (10) years: ___________________________________________________________.

4.3. Bankruptcy. Within the past ten (10) years has the Respondent or a predecessor to Respondent filed any bankruptcy proceeding?

� Yes � No If “Yes” please attach a copy of the bankruptcy petition, showing the case number and the date on which the petition was filed, and a copy of the Bankruptcy Court’s discharge order.

4.4. Respondent Ownership Changes. Within the past five (5) years, has there been a change in equity ownership of Respondent that cumulatively equals or exceeds ten percent (10%)?

� Yes � No If “Yes” please describe in detail all such equity changes in a separate attachment.

4.5. Respondent Contractors’ License and Bonding Capacity. Is the Respondent a California licensed contractor?

� Yes (Respondent must respond to Questions 4.5.1 - 4.5.5) � No (Proceed to Question 4.6)

4.5.1. Current RMO/RME: ______________________________________

4.5.2. Has the RMO/RME been changed in the past five (5) years? � Yes � No If “Yes” describe and detail all such RMO/RME changes in the past five (5) years in an attachment.

4.5.3. In the past ten (10) years, have any complaints been filed with the California State Contractors License Board (“CSLB”) against the Respondent’s contractors’ license?

� Yes � No If “Yes” describe and detail all such complaints in an attachment.

4.5.4. In the past ten (10) years, has the Respondent’s contractors’ license been subject to any disciplinary action imposed by the CSLB?


[CONTINUED NEXT PAGE]



4.5.5. If the Respondent provides construction services, complete the following for the Respondent’s Surety:

Surety Name ______________________________________________

Surety Broker Broker Firm Name: ______________________________

Contact Person: ______________________________

Phone (___) _________________________

Email ______________________________

Current Maximum Bonding Capacity _______________________________ Dollars ($________)

Maximum Bonding Capacity Per Project

_______________________________ Dollars ($________)

4.6. Architectural Services. Does the Respondent employ California licensed architects or engineers and provide architect/design professional services?

� Yes (Respondent must respond to Questions 4.6.1 – 4.6.4) � No (Proceed to Question 4.7)

4.6.1. Respondent Reported Claims. Within the past ten (10) years, has the Respondent or Respondent’s predecessor(s) reported to the California Architects Board (“Board”) any civil action judgment, settlement, arbitration award, or administrative action resulting in a judgment, settlement, or arbitration award against the Respondent or Respondent’s predecessor in any action alleging fraud, deceit, negligence, incompetence, or recklessness in the practice of architecture where the judgment, settlement, or arbitration award was five thousand dollars ($5,000) or greater, as required by California Business & Professions Code §5588(a)?

� Yes � No If “Yes” on a separate attachment, provide details of: (i) the title of the matter; (ii) the court or agency name; (iii) docket number; (iv) the claim or file number; (v) date on which the reportable event occurred; (vi) judgment, settlement or arbitration award.

4.6.2. Professional Liability Insurer Reported Claims. Within the past ten (10) years, has any professional liability insurer for the Respondent reported to the California Architects Board (“Board”) payment by the professional liability insurer of any civil action judgment, settlement, arbitration award, or administrative action resulting in a judgment, settlement, or arbitration award against the Respondent or Respondent’s predecessor in any action alleging fraud, deceit, negligence, incompetence, or recklessness in the practice of architecture where the judgment, settlement, or arbitration award was five thousand dollars ($5,000) or greater, as required by California Business & Professions Code §5588.1?

� Yes � No If “Yes” on a separate attachment, provide details of: (i) amount of judgment, settlement or arbitration award; and (ii) amount paid by professional liability insurer.

4.6.3. Pending Professional Liability Claims and Disputes. The Respondent is presently engaged in a claim, dispute or disagreement which asserts the professional negligence



or professional liability of Respondent or any Design Consultant to Respondent in connection with architectural or design professional services provided by or through Respondent for any public or private work of improvement.

� Yes � No If “Yes” provide details, including without limitation: (i) the title of the matter; (ii) the court or agency name; (iii) docket number; (iv) the claim or file number; (v) amount in controversy; (vi) contact information (name, address, phone and email address) for each party pursing a pending claim against the Respondent.

4.6.4. Pending Payment Claims and Disputes. The Respondent is presently engaged in a claim, dispute or other disagreement relating to or arising out of a private or public contract for architectural services in which the Respondent is seeking additional compensation.

� Yes � No If “Yes” on a separate attachment, provide details of each such pending claim, dispute or other disagreement.

4.7. General Contractor Questionnaire. If the Respondent is not a California licensed contractor and will contract with a general contractor for construction of the Project, the Respondent must respond to Questions 4.7.1 – 4.7.7. If the Respondent is a general contractor and has responded to Questions 4.5.1 – 4.5.5, no responses are required for Questions 4.7.1 – 4.7.7

4.7.1. Name of proposed general contractor: _______________________________________

4.7.2. Contractors’ License Information:

4.7.2.1. Contractors’ License Number: _________________

4.7.2.2. Contractors’ License Expiration Date: ________________

4.7.2.3. Contractors’ License Classification(s): ________________

4.7.3. Current RMO/RME: ______________________________________

4.7.4. Has the general contractor’s RMO/RME been changed in the past five (5) years? � Yes � No If “Yes” describe and detail all such RMO/RME changes in the past five (5) years in an attachment.

4.7.5. In the past ten (10) years, have any complaints been filed with the California State Contractors License Board (“CSLB”) against the general contractor’s contractors’ license?


4.7.6. In the past ten (10) years, has the general contractors’ license been subject to any disciplinary action imposed by the CSLB?




[CONTINUED NEXT PAGE] 4.7.7. Complete the following for the general contractor’s Surety:

Surety Name ______________________________________________

Surety Broker Broker Firm Name: ______________________________

Contact Person: ______________________________

Phone (___) _________________________

Email ______________________________

Current Maximum Bonding Capacity _______________________________ Dollars ($________)

Maximum Bonding Capacity Per Project

_______________________________ Dollars ($________)

4.8. AOR Questionnaire. If the Respondent is not the proposed AOR for the Project and the Respondent will contract with an architectural services firm to serve as the AOR for the Project, the Respondent must respond to Questions 4.8.1 – 4.8.5. If the Respondent is the AOR for the Project and has responded to Questions 4.6.1 - 4.6.4, responses to Questions 4.8.1 – 4.8.5 are not required.

4.8.1. Name of Proposed AOR. __________________________________________

4.8.2. AOR Reported Claims. Within the past ten (10) years, has the AOR or AOR’s predecessor(s) reported to the California Architects Board (“Board”) any civil action judgment, settlement, arbitration award, or administrative action resulting in a judgment, settlement, or arbitration award against the AOR or AOR’s predecessor in any action alleging fraud, deceit, negligence, incompetence, or recklessness in the practice of architecture where the judgment, settlement, or arbitration award was five thousand dollars ($5,000) or greater, as required by California Business & Professions Code §5588(a)?


4.8.3. Professional Liability Insurer Reported Claims. Within the past ten (10) years, has any professional liability insurer for the AOR reported to the California Architects Board (“Board”) payment by the professional liability insurer of any civil action judgment, settlement, arbitration award, or administrative action resulting in a judgment, settlement, or arbitration award against the AOR or AOR’s predecessor in any action alleging fraud, deceit, negligence, incompetence, or recklessness in the practice of architecture where the judgment, settlement, or arbitration award was five thousand dollars ($5,000) or greater, as required by California Business & Professions Code §5588.1?




4.8.4. Pending Professional Liability Claims and Disputes. The AOR is presently engaged in a claim, dispute or disagreement which asserts the professional negligence or professional liability of AOR or any Design Consultant to the AOR in connection with architectural or design professional services provided by or through the AOR for any public or private work of improvement.

� Yes � No If “Yes” provide details, including without limitation: (i) the title of the matter; (ii) the court or agency name; (iii) docket number; (iv) the claim or file number; (v) amount in controversy; (vi) contact information (name, address, phone and email address) for each party pursing a pending claim against the Respondent.

4.8.5. Pending Payment Claims and Disputes. The AOR is presently engaged in a claim, dispute or other disagreement relating to or arising out of a private or public contract for architectural services in which the AOR is seeking additional compensation.


4.9. Proposed Design Consultants to AOR. Each Respondent must respond to the following for each proposed design consultant for the following design disciplines: structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, civil, landscape, and sports fields.

4.9.1. Design Consultant Reported Claims. Within the past ten (10) years, has any of the Design Consultants or their predecessor(s) reported to the Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists (“Engineer Board”) any civil action settlement or administrative action resulting in a settlement against the licensee in any action alleging fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, breach or violation of contract, negligence, incompetence, or recklessness by the licensee in the practice of professional engineering if the amount or value of the settlement is greater than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) or any civil action judgment, settlement, or binding arbitration award, or administrative action resulting in a judgment, settlement, or binding arbitration award against the licensee in any action alleging fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, breach or violation of contract, negligence, incompetence, or recklessness by the licensee in the practice of professional engineering if the amount or value of the judgment, settlement, or binding arbitration award is twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) or greater, as required by California Business & Professions Code §6770(a)(3)and (4)?


4.9.2. Design Consultant’s Professional Liability Insurer Reported Claims. Within the past ten (10) years, has any professional liability insurer for any of the Design Consultants reported to the Engineer Board payment by the professional liability insurer of any civil action judgment, settlement, arbitration award, or administrative action resulting in a judgment, settlement, or arbitration award against the Design Consultant or the Design Consultant’s predecessor, as required by California Business & Professions Code §6770.1?




4.9.3. Pending Professional Liability Claims and Disputes. Are any of the Design Consultants presently engaged in a claim, dispute or disagreement which asserts the professional negligence or professional liability of the Design Consultant in connection with design professional services provided by or through the Design Consultant for any public or private work of improvement.

� Yes � No If “Yes” provide details, including without limitation: (i) the title of the matter; (ii) the court or agency name; (iii) docket number; (iv) the claim or file number; (v) amount in controversy; (vi) contact information (name, address, phone and email address) for each party pursing a pending claim against the Design Consultant.

4.9.4. Pending Payment Claims and Disputes. Are any Design Consultants presently engaged in a claim, dispute or other disagreement relating to or arising out of a private or public project in which the Design Consultant is seeking additional compensation.


4.10. Proposed Subcontractors. Each Respondent must respond to the following for each proposed subcontractor for the following trades: structural steel, structural concrete, non-structural concrete, earthwork, mechanical, electrical (line voltage and low voltage), plumbing, landscaping, artificial field turf, and roofing.

4.10.1. Contractors’ License Information. Duplicate and complete the following for each proposed subcontractor for each trade described in Paragraph 4.10; attach the completed forms of the following to the Pre-Qualification Application.

Subcontractor Information Proposed Subcontractor Name

Subcontractor Trade

Subcontractor Contractors’ License ____________

License Number ____________ Classification(s)

____________ Expiration Date

Subcontractor DIR Registration __________________ DIR Registration Number

Current RMO/RME

Has the subcontractor’s RMO/RME been changed in the past five (5) years?

� Yes � No If “Yes” describe and detail all such RMO/RME changes in the past five (5) years in an



attachment.

In the past ten (10) years, have any complaints been filed with the CSLB against the subcontractor’s contractors’ license?


In the past ten (10) years, has the subcontractor’s license been subject to any disciplinary action imposed by the CSLB?


5. Essential Minimum Qualifications. Any response of a Respondent indicating “not qualified” to the following minimum qualifications criteria will result in rejection of the Respondent’s RFQ Response for failure to meet minimum qualifications criteria.

5.1. Respondent has a current Commercial General Liability policy of insurance with coverage limits of at least Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence and Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000) in the aggregate.

� Yes � No (not qualified)

5.2. If the Respondent will not serve as the general contractor for construction of the Project does the proposed general contractor currently have a Commercial General Liability policy of insurance with coverage limits of at least Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence and Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000) in the aggregate.

� Not Applicable, Respondent will serve as the project general contractor � Yes � No (not qualified)

5.3. Does each proposed subcontractor currently have a Commercial General Liability policy of insurance with coverage limits of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate.


5.4. Respondent or the Respondent’s AOR has a current professional liability policy of insurance with coverage limits of at least Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) per claim and Four Millions Dollars ($4,000,000) in the aggregate.


5.5. Does each proposed Design Consultants have a current professional liability policy of insurance with coverage limits of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate?


5.6. Respondent has obtained a current Workers Compensation policy of insurance with coverage limits in accordance with applicable law.


5.7. Every proposed Design Consultant has obtained a current Workers Compensation policy of



insurance with coverage limits in accordance with applicable law. � Yes � No (not qualified)

5.8. Every proposed subcontractor has obtained a current Workers Compensation policy of insurance with coverage limits in accordance with applicable law.


5.9. Respondent is ineligible for award of public works contracts pursuant to Labor Code §1777.1 or 1777.7.

� Yes (not qualified) � No

5.10. If the Respondent will not serve as the general contractor for construction of the Project, is the proposed general contractor ineligible for award of public works contracts pursuant to Labor Code §1777.1 or 1777.7.


5.11. Has any public agency, within the past ten (10) years conducted proceedings that resulted in a finding that the Respondent or any predecessor to the Respondent is not a “responsible” bidder for a public works project or a public works contract?


5.12. If the Respondent will not serve as the general contractor for construction of the Project, has any public agency, within the past ten (10) years conducted proceedings that resulted in a finding that the proposed general contractor or any predecessor to the proposed general contractor is not a “responsible” bidder for a public works project or a public works contract?


5.13. At any time during the last ten (10) years, has Respondent or any predecessor to the Respondent been convicted of a crime involving any federal, state, or local law related to a private or public construction project?


5.14. At any time during the last ten (10) years, has the Respondent or any predecessor to the Respondent been convicted of a federal or state crime involving fraud, theft, or any other act of dishonesty?


5.15. Within the past ten (10) years, one or more contract(s) to provide work, labor, materials or services to which the Respondent was a party to have been terminated for default of the Respondent.


5.16. If the Respondent will not serve as the general contractor for construction of the Project, within the past ten (10) years, have one or more contract(s) to provide work, labor, materials or services to which the proposed general contractor was a party to have been terminated for



default of the proposed general contractor? � Yes (not qualified) � No

5.17. Does the Experience Modification Rating (EMR) for the Respondent’s workers compensation insurance policy or the proposed general contractor’s workers compensation exceed an average of 1.0 for the most recent three (3) year period.


6. Questionnaire. Respondents must answer each of the following questions. Where a response requires additional details, provide details in a separate attachment to this Pre-Qualification Application.

6.1. At any time in the last ten (10) years has the Respondent or the proposed general contractor been assessed liquidated damages of more than $25,000 on a construction contract with either a public or private owner?

� Yes � No

If yes, identify all such projects by owner, owner’s address, name of entity against whom assessment was made, the date of completion of the project, amount of liquidated damages assessed and all other information necessary to fully explain the assessment of liquidated damages.

6.2. Has the Respondent or the proposed general contractor ever been declared in default on a construction contract?

� Yes � No If yes, identify all such projects by owner, owner’s address. Provide details of each default declaration.

6.3. In the past ten (10) years has any claim in excess of $50,000 been filed in a judicial proceeding (litigation) or in an arbitration proceeding against the Respondent or the proposed general contractor concerning a construction project?

� Yes � No If yes, identify all such projects by owner, owner’s address. Provide details of each such claim, including the disposition thereof.

6.4. In the past ten (10) years has the Respondent or proposed general contractor asserted a claim in excess of $50,000 in a judicial proceeding (litigation) or in an arbitration proceeding against a project owner?

� Yes � No If yes, identify all such projects by owner, owner’s address. Provide details of each such claim, including the disposition thereof.

6.5. In the last ten (10) years has any insurer, for any policy of insurance, refused or declined to renew the insurance policy for the Respondent or the proposed general contractor?

� Yes � No If yes, describe each such insurance policy and the reason(s) for the insurer’s refusal to renew the policy of insurance.



6.6. Has the Respondent or proposed general contractor ever been found liable in a civil suit or found guilty in a criminal action for making any false claim or material misrepresentation to any public entity?

� Yes � No If yes, provide details of each such instance, including identification of the public entity, nature of the false claim or material misrepresentation and the penalty imposed.

6.7. Has the Respondent or the proposed general contractor been cited by CAL OSHA for any “serious,” “willful” or “repeat” violations in the past ten (10) years?

� Yes � No If “yes,” on separate page describe the citations, the party against whom the citation was made, date of citation, nature of the violation, project on which the citation was issued, project owner, and the amount of penalty paid, if any. State the case number and date of any OSHAB decision.

6.8. Provide the Experience Modification Rating (EMR) for the Respondent or the proposed general contractor for the past three (3) premium years:

Policy Year EMR 2017-2018

2016-2017

2015-2016

6.9. Has the Respondent or the proposed general contractor been subject to payment of back wages or penalties for failure to comply with the prevailing wage requirements within the past five (5) years?

� Yes � No If “yes,” attach a separate page, describing the violation, nature of each violation, name of the project, date of its completion, the project owner and a description of the back wages and/or penalty assessment.

6.10. At any time during the last five (5) years, has the Respondent or proposed general contractor or its associates been found to have violated any provision of California apprenticeship laws or regulations, or the laws pertaining to use of apprentices on public works?

� Yes � No If “yes,” provide the date of the findings and attach a copy of the final decision.

6.11. Do agreements exist between the Respondent or the proposed general contractor and registered apprenticeship programs which have been approved by the California Apprenticeship Council and have graduated apprentices in the preceding ten (10) years, for all apprenticable crafts which may be employed by the Respondent or proposed general contractor on the project? (This graduation requirement does not apply to programs providing apprenticeship training for any craft that has not been deemed by the Department of Labor and the Department of Industrial Relations to be an apprenticable craft within the period of October, 1999 to October, 2001.)

� Yes � No



6.12. In the last ten (10) years has any insurer, for any policy of insurance, refused or declined to renew an insurance policy for the AOR, based on non-payment or losses?

� Yes � No If yes, describe each such insurance policy and the reason(s) for the insurer’s refusal to renew the policy of insurance.

6.13. How many design-build projects has the Respondent completed with the AOR proposed for the Project? ____________________

On a separate attachment, provide details of each design-build project completed by the Respondent and the proposed AOR.

7. Certification and Verification. The undersigned is duly authorized to execute this Pre-Qualification Application under penalty of perjury on behalf of the above-identified Respondent. The undersigned warrants and represents that he/she has personal knowledge of each of the responses to this Pre-Qualification Application and/or that he/she has conducted all necessary and appropriate inquiries to determine the truth, completeness and accuracy of responses to this Pre-Qualification Application. The undersigned declares and certifies that the responses to this Pre-Qualification Application are complete and accurate; there are no omissions of material fact or information that would render any response to be false or misleading and there are no misstatements of fact in any of the responses. The above-identified Respondent acknowledges and agrees that if the District determines that any response herein is false or misleading or contains misstatements of fact, the Response shall be deemed non-responsive and the Respondent will not further participate in the RFQ process.

Executed this___ day of __________________ 2019 at___________________________________. (City and State)

I declare under penalty of perjury under California law that the foregoing is true and correct.

________________________________________ (Signature)

________________________________________ (Name and Title)



NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF _________________________) PROJECT: RFQ No. K-19, New Baseball Field Project, Chabot College

I, __________________________________, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that I (Typed or Printed Name)

am the ________________________ of _____________________________________, the party (Title) (Bidder Name) submitting the foregoing Bid Proposal (“the Bidder”). In connection with the foregoing Bid Proposal, the undersigned declares, states and certifies that:

1. The Bid Proposal is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation.

2. The Bid Proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham. 3. The bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false

or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any other bidder or anyone else to put in sham bid, or to refrain from bidding.

4. The bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price, or that of any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit or cost element of the bid price or that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract or of anyone interested in the proposed contract.

5. All statements contained in the Bid Proposal and related documents are true. 6. The bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted the bid price or any breakdown thereof,

or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any person, corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid.

Executed this ____ day of ___________, 2019 at _________________________________. (City, County and State)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. _________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________

Signature (Address) __________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________

Name Printed or Typed (City, County and State)

(________)_____________________________________________ (Area Code and Telephone Number)



CERTIFICATION OF PRE-BID SITE VISIT The Honorable Board of Trustees Chabot-Las Positas Community College District 7600 Dublin Blvd., 3rd Floor Dublin, California 94568 RE: RFQ No. K-19, New Baseball Field Project, Chabot College Ladies and Gentlemen: In connection with submitting a Bid Proposal for the Work described as RFQ No. K-19, New Baseball Field Project, Chabot College, I visited the Sites of the Work on Monday, February 11, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. OR on Wednesday, February 13, 2019, at 10:00 a.m.; on the Chabot College campus, Construction Trailer adjacent from Building 3000 at 25555 Hesperian Blvd., Hayward, California 94545 on behalf of __________________________________________________________ Bidder Name to inspect the Site of the proposed work, which will be turned over to the Bidder, if awarded the Contract, in its present condition, with a representative of the Chabot-Las Positas Community College, in order to acquaint the Bidder with the proposed Work so that the Bidder fully understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attendant to execution and completion of the Work. I have also reviewed on behalf of the Bidder, the as-built drawings and/or previous Contract Documents, site conditions and Bid Documents with District representatives and/or Contract Manager at Chabot College. I certify all conditions provided for my review and their effect on the Work as called for in the Contract Documents are included and accounted for in the Bid Proposal amounts submitted to the District. I understand that a Bidder who fails to submit this Certification of Pre-Bid Site Visit, fully executed, with the Bidder’s Bid Proposal form, will result in rejection of the Bid Proposal for non-responsiveness. Name of Bidder Authorized Signatory Address Phone Number Date


Request for Qualifications No. K-19 | 42New Baseball Field Project, Chabot College Attachment B; Agreement for Design Build Services

AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN BUILD SERVICES

RFQ Attachment B

The Agreement will provided in an Addendum


Request for Qualifications No. K-19 | 43 New Baseball Field Project, Chabot College Attachment C: Chabot College Campus Map

CHABOT COLLEGE CAMPUS MAP

RFQ Attachment C

Crit

eria

Doc

umen

t

33

STORAGE

TOILET

1

4

5

29

7

3

10

10

10

11

11

1111

6

8

Baseball Field

Home Dugout (Including sanitary fixture)

Home Bullpen

Visitor Dugout (Including sanitary fixture)

Visitor Bullpen

Batting Cages (4 lanes)

Tiered Seating

Storage Room Building

Press box Building Public Restrooms Mechanical/electrical Training Room Custodial Concessions Gender Neutral Restroom

Press Box

Viewing Berms

Storage

Restroom

LEGEND

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

SCALE: 1" = 60'-0"

N

60'0 120' 240'

ATTACHMENT D

ValdezTS

Typewritten Text

DRAFT

Crit

eria

Doc

umen

t

9

About the District

The Chabot-Las Positas Community College District was founded in

1961 and serves the San Francisco East Bay Area, particularly southern

Alameda County, through its two colleges: Chabot College in Hayward

and Las Positas College in Livermore. The colleges specialize in

university transfer, technical training, continuing education, workforce

development, contract education with local businesses and cultural

enrichment. The district serves 24,500 students and employs more than

2,000 administrators, faculty and classified staff. The Chabot College

Athletic Department offers 16 intercollegiate sports for men and women,

and Chabot Athletics prides itself in developing student-athletes to

achieve skills in the pursuit of athletic competition and to excel in their

academic pursuits. By participating in athletics, students can grow

mentally, physically and to develop teamwork skills. Through quality

coaching and dedication, student-athletes achieve a successful transfer

rate to four-year institutions where they can continue their academic and

athletic careers.

Project Description

Chabot College intends to build a new permanent state of the art

Baseball Field through a Design Build project delivery process. It

is the intent of Chabot College that this new facility serves as a

reflection of the pride and quality its student athletes and coaches

are known for and which will strengthen the Chabot College Gladiator

identity and brand.

The College’s Vision of the Baseball Field includes the following:

•A Facility that students are proud of and where they can hone

their craft

•A Facility that student athletes desire to be part of

•Recognition as a comfortable venue to view and enjoy quality

baseball games

To which end, the new baseball field will be a good pitching and

batting facility and provide a great fan experience with good sightlines

and comfortable stadium style seats.

In the existing facility, student athletes are unable to play nor practice

year round because of poor field drainage and exposed practice

facilities. Students have to drive several miles to other facilities

that the college rents to practice or play when there is inclement

weather. Therefore in support of the goals and visions stated above, this

new Baseball Field will be an all-weather, year-round facility with improved

connectivity and accessibility with the rest of the campus.

Some of the features the New Baseball Field will have includes:

•New Press box Building with improved sightlines and media

support

•Tiered Stadium style seats

•New Dirt Pitcher’s Mound with padded backstop and improved

netting

•New Three (3) lane All Weather Batting Cages

•New Restrooms

•New Fully Accessible and larger Dugouts

•All New Turf in the Playing Field, Bull Pens, Outfield with

improved drainage

•All New Batters Eye

•New LED Scoreboard with video support

•New Entry Plaza, Walk of Fame and with improved security for the

field

This new Baseball Field represents a commitment on the part of Chabot

College to its student athletes, coaches and the community that supports

it.

ATTACHMENT D

ValdezTS

Typewritten Text

DRAFT

Crit

eria

Doc

umen

t

15

This Design Build Project constructs a new permanent state-of-the-art,

Baseball Field in the present location of the existing baseball field. It is

anticipated that the current baseball field orientation will be retained for

an optimum playing experience. This is anticipated to be a year round

training and playing field and will promote the Chabot College Gladiator

identity.

The Project will consist of approximately:

Demolition of the existing Press box building, (3) Conex containers,

existing tiered seating adjacent to the home and visitor infields, existing

concessions building, and poles and fences in the backfield.

The main goals for the New Basebal field master plan are:

The new baseball field should be playable year round

-The district has decided to build a Full synthetic turf field and foul

areas. The pitcher’s mound will be the only playing field element

that will contain clay.

-The field will be fully fenced and secure. While no field lighting is

foreseen in the program, an LED scoreboard able to support video

is part of the scope of the work.

The field and supporting facilities are geared toward athlete support and

development

-The backside of the pitcher’s mound in the field should be

fitted with a quick coupler and power to support technical analysis

and development.

-The home bullpen and batting cages will be full synthetic turf

-New Plyometric wall at the batting cage.

-Dugouts have storage and sanitary facility to accommodate

athlete needs.

-If add alternate 4A is accepted Team room will be located for

athlete comfort and convenience.

- If add alternate 4B is accepted, training room will be located

adjacent to New field to provide immediate

treatment if needed.

New baseball field should create “Fan Experience” that promotes

attendance and support.

- Tiered stadium seating is provided directly adjacent to field

behind the backstop, home and visitor’s dugout.

-Improved views are offered from new viewing berms outfitted

with ramp and stair access for spectator comfort.

-New restroom facilities and concession stand

-Pre-function plazas in the site

Emphasize and promoted the Gladiator Identity

-Integrated turf logo in the outfield

-New Gateway at the entrance to the new facilities

-College branding at Batting cage plyometric wall and other

opportunities the DB Team identifies.

Connect to the campus

-The architecture of the baseball field shall be harmonious with the

campus’s existing conditions and guidelines set forth in the 2012

Campus Masterplan

-New Paths and plazas will be a natural extension of existing

campus circulation

-New landscape will create diverse visuals that merge with the

existing groves

ATTACHMENT D

ValdezTS

Typewritten Text

DRAFT

P R O J E C T S C H E D U L ECHABOT C O L L E G E BASEBALL FIELD BRIDGING DOCUMENTS

Revised 11/29/18

2018 2 0 1 9 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 1MILESTONES/ACTIVITIES

STARTDATE

FINISHDATE

Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Construction

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

PHASE 1 - PROJECT INITIATIONProject Kick Off - User Meeting 01 9/6/2018

PHASE 2 - PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTProgramming Activities

User Mtg 02: User Input/ Prelim Program 9/27/2018 XUser Mtg 03: Conceptual Site Approach &Skyline College Site Visit 10/11/2018 XUser Mtg 04: Finalized Program andConcept Design 11/1/2018 X

Cost Estimate Activities 11/1/2018 11/9/2018 XCost Estimate District review 11/12/2018Cost Estimate due to Chabot College 11/19/2018

PHASE 3 - SCHEMATIC DESIGN 11/26/2018 1/14/2019Schematic Design activities

SD Mtg 01: Final Schematic Design review 12/13/2018 XCost Estimate Activities 12/13/2018 1/3/2019

Cost Estimate District review 1/7/2019Cost Estimate due to Chabot College 1/14/2019

Chabot College SD Review and approvalto proceed to the next phase 1/14/2019

PHASE 4 - BRIDGING DOCUMENTS 1/14/2019 2/14/2019Bridging Document activities

District Review 1/28/2019Finale Bridging Documents Due to CC 2/14/2029

PHASE 5 - DISTRICT PROCUREMENT 2/21/2019 6/21/2019District Procurement activities

District RFQ for DB 2/21/2019District issuance for RFP 3/14/2019

District Interviews, Selection process 4/4/2019District Recommendation to BOT 4/16/2019

DBE Selected4/30/2019 X

DBE DESIGN ACTIVITIES (6 MOS)5/7/2019 11/4/2019

PHASE 6 - CONSTRUCTION DOC. REVIEW 11/4/2019 12/6/2019Construction Documents Review activities

DBE CD Mtg 01: M and O Page Turn 11/6/2019 XDBE CD Mtg 02: AV/IT Page Turn 11/13/2019 X

HMC Final Comments back to CC 11/20/2019

DBE DSA Submittal 12/6/2019

DSA REVIEW / APPROVAL (5 MOS) 12/6/2019 5/4/2020

CONSTRUCTION (10 MOS) 5/4/2020 3/5/2021

Client submittal X Client meeting

ATTACHMENT E

ATTACHMENT F - PROJECT BUDGET

REQUEST FOR QUALFICAITIONS (RFQ)

DESIGN, PRECONSTRUCTION, AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR THE NEW BASEBALL FIELD, CHABOT

COLLEGE

RFQ #K-19

Project #562500, Athletic Fields, Baseball

Description Budget

Design and Construction 5,800,000$

Inspections and Testing 145,000$

District Soft Costs 1,315,704$

Contingency 545,200$

Total 7,805,904$