ch15
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 15
Using Measures of Intelligence
General Issues in Measuring Intelligence
• General v. multiple intelligence • Genes v. experience – More recently: Interaction between genes and experience
• Decline in the use of IQ tests– May not inform instruction– Over-identification of sub-groups– Low expectations associated with labels (e.g. mentally
retarded)• Recall that all tests are samples of behavior– Evaluation of intelligence should extend beyond scores
The Effect of Pupil Characteristics on Assessment of Intelligence
• Acculturation – The level of background experiences and opportunities to learn
in both formal and informal educational settings– Level of acculturation increases with time spent in a particular
environment (e.g. United States public school system)• Test items vary in their connection to culture
– For example:• Asking students to compare hail and sleet
– What about students who have no experience with hail or sleet?
• Educators must seriously consider student factors when interpreting information from intelligence tests– Consequences
• Inaccurate information may result in a restriction of opportunity and rights
Behaviors Sampled by Intelligence Tests
• Discrimination• Generalization• Motor Behavior • General Knowledge• Vocabulary • Induction• Comprehension
• Sequencing • Detail Recognition • Analogical Reasoning• Pattern Completion• Abstract Reasoning• Memory
Factors Underlying Intelligence Test Behaviors
• General intelligence theory (g)– Charles Spearman
• Raymond Cattell and associates– Fluid intelligence– Crystallized intelligence
• Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory– Added intelligence factors– Theory on which many prominent tests of
cognitive ability are based
Types of Intelligence Tests
• Individual tests– Frequently used for making exceptionality,
eligibility, and educational placement decisions
• Group tests– Screening devices– Sources of descriptive information
• Nonverbal intelligence tests– Provide a more limited estimate of intelligence
Commonly Used Tests
• Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – IV (WISC-IV)
• Woodcock-Johnson III Normative Update: Tests of Cognitive Abilities (WJ-III-COG)
• Woodcock-Johnson III Normative Update: Tests of Achievement (WJ-III-ACH)
• Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Fourth Edition (PPVT-4)
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – IV (WISC-IV)
• General– Assesses cognitive ability and problem-solving
processes in individuals 6-16 years of age– Measures global intelligence and discrete domains of
cognitive functioning• Norm population– Standardized on 2,200 children – Stratified according to the 2000 U.S. census
information– Representative sample of student in special groups
(e.g. learning disorders, gifted, ADHD)
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – IV (WISC-IV)
WISC-IV Subtests
Verbal Comprehension
Perceptual Reasoning
Working Memory Processing Speed
Similarities Block design Digit span Coding
Vocabulary Picture concepts Letter-number sequencing
Symbol search
Comprehension Matrix reasoning Arithmetic Cancellation
Information Picture completion
Word reasoning
Scores•Standard scores available for all four subtests and a full-scale IQ •Tables available to convert scores to percentile ranks, and confidence intervals. •7 process scores
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – IV (WISC-IV)
• Reliability– Test-retest and split-half – Full-scale IQ and index scores are reliable enough for
important educational decisions– Subtests and process indicators are not sufficiently
reliable for such decisions • Although may be useful to consider in addition to FSIQ
• Validity– Test content, response processes, internal structure,
relationship to other variables – Validity evidence is extensive but somewhat
inconsistent
• Woodcock-Johnson III Normative Update: Tests of Cognitive Abilities (WJ-III-COG)
• Woodcock-Johnson III Normative Update: Tests of Achievement (WJ-III-ACH)
• General– Individually administered, norm-referenced
assessment system for the measurement of general intellectual ability, specific cognitive abilities, scholastic aptitudes, oral language, and achievement
– Pre-K – Adulthood
Woodcock-Johnson III Normative Update
Woodcock-Johnson III Normative Update: Tests of Achievement (WJ-III-ACH)
• Clusters– Oral expression– Listening comprehension– Basic reading skills– Reading comprehension– Phoneme/Grapheme
knowledge– Math calculation– Math reasoning– Written expression
• Subtests and clusters can be combined to form scores for broad areas in reading, mathematics, and writing
Woodcock-Johnson III Normative Update
• Scores– Computer scoring– Age norms, grade norms, percentile ranks,
standard scores, relatively proficiencies indices– Test session observation checklist
• Norms– Large norm population (8,782 total and 4,740 K-
12)– Matched to U.S. census data
Woodcock-Johnson III Normative Update
• Reliability– Adequate reliability data for standard broad
cognitive and achievement clusters
• Validity – Adequate content, construct, and criterion-
related validity evidence
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Fourth Edition (PPVT-4)
• General– Individually administered, norm-referenced, non-
timed test – Assesses receptive vocabulary of children and
adults– May also be useful as a supplemental assessment • Language competence• Selecting instruction• Measuring learning
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Fourth Edition (PPVT-4)
• Administration– Examinee shown a set of four colored pictures• Selects picture that best represents a spoken word• Age appropriate stimuli sets of 12
• Scores– Raw scores converted to • Standard scores, percentiles, normal curve equivalents,
and stanines• Age and grade equivalents • Also may measure change in PPVT scale over time
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Fourth Edition (PPVT-4)
• Norm population– 3,540 people sampled across a broad array of
demographic variables– Adequately represents the U.S. population at each
age and grade level
• Reliability– Adequate reliability data reported as:• Split-half and coefficient alpha, alternate-form, test-
retest
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Fourth Edition (PPVT-4)
• Validity – Adequate criterion-referenced validity– Discrimination data between special populations
and general population– May be used as intended