cgmes conformity assessment frameworkcimug.ucaiug.org/meetings/oslo2014/presentations/cim...test...

18
CGMES Conformity Assessment Framework Chavdar Ivanov, ENTSO-E CIM User Group meeting 20 June 2014 Oslo

Upload: others

Post on 21-Oct-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • CGMES Conformity Assessment Framework

    Chavdar Ivanov, ENTSO-E

    CIM User Group meeting

    20 June 2014 Oslo

  • Debugging Effort on Supplier side

    Reducing Effort on TSO side

    Gaining Clarity about CGMES conformity

    Increase overall quality of the exchanged data by

    Adopting CGMES as standards (TSO’s)

    Having TSO’s able to rely on applications/systems adopting

    CGMES.

    WH

    AT

    1. Conformity Assessment\ WHAT – WHY

    OB

    JETC

    IVE

    CA

    PAB

    ILIT

    Y

    Improved data collection handling - TSO’s

    Improved data collection handling – ENTSO-E Secretariat

    Improved exchange of data between TSO’s – Improve

    interoperability

    WH

    Y

    BEN

    EFIT

    S

    IMPARTIALITY

    CONFIDENTIALITY

    RESP

    ONSIV

    ENES

    S to

    COM

    PLAI

    NTS &

    APP

    EALS

    DISC

    LOSU

    RE o

    f

    INFO

    RMAT

    ION

    CONFIDENCE &

    TRUST

  • Launch a set of projects

    Phase 1: [Analysis] (Finished)

    Adopting CASCO Standards (based on). Identify Processes & Materials needed.

    Phase 2: [Development & Launch] (Finalizing)

    Develop Processes & Materials Establishing Governance Operating as Service (Initiating)

    2. Conformity Assessment\ HOWH

    OW

    IMPARTIALITY

    CONFIDENTIALITY

    RESP

    ONSIV

    ENES

    S to

    COM

    PLAI

    NTS &

    APP

    EALS

    DISC

    LOSU

    RE o

    f

    INFO

    RMAT

    ION

    CONFIDENCE &

    TRUST

    IMPARTIALITY

    CONFIDENTIALITY

    RESP

    ONSIV

    ENES

    S to

    COM

    PLAI

    NTS &

    APP

    EALS

    DISC

    LOSU

    RE o

    f

    INFO

    RMAT

    ION

    CONFIDENCE &

    TRUST

  • 6/15/2014

    3. CASCO & CORE PRINCIPLES

    IMPARTIALITY

    CONFIDENTIALITY

    RESP

    ONSIV

    ENES

    S to

    COM

    PLAI

    NTS &

    APP

    EALS

    DISC

    LOSU

    RE o

    f

    INFO

    RMAT

    ION

    CONFIDENCE &

    TRUST

    C A S C O

    IMPARTIALITY

    CONFIDENTIALITY

    RESP

    ONSIV

    ENES

    S to

    COM

    PLAI

    NTS &

    APP

    EALS

    DISC

    LOSU

    RE o

    f

    INFO

    RMAT

    ION

    CONFIDENCE &

    TRUST

  • 4. Conformity Assessment – As a Service

    Conformity Assessment

    As a Service

    IMPARTIALITY

    CONFIDENTIALITY

    RESP

    ONSIV

    ENES

    S to

    COM

    PLAI

    NTS &

    APP

    EALS

    DISC

    LOSU

    RE o

    f

    INFO

    RMAT

    ION

    CONFIDENCE &

    TRUST

    Supplier Perspective

    Supplier

    IMPARTIALITY

    CONFIDENTIALITY

    RESP

    ONSIV

    ENES

    S to

    COM

    PLAI

    NTS &

    APP

    EALS

    DISC

    LOSU

    RE o

    f

    INFO

    RMAT

    ION

    CONFIDENCE &

    TRUST

  • Scheme Owner Opinion Body

    Assessment Body

    Review Team*Review Team*Review Team*

    Second Opinion Team

    Second Opinion Team

    Second Review Team*

    Supplier

    Strategic

    Data

    Governance

    Steering

    ENTSO-E

    Secretariat +

    TSO’s

    e.g. TSO’s

    Supplier

    Reviewer

    Pool

    Guidance

    ENTSO-E

    Secretariat

    WG

    Standardization

    Supplier

    5. Conformity Assessment – Governance – [WHO] IMPARTIALITYCONFIDENTIALITY

    RESP

    ONSIV

    ENES

    S to

    COM

    PLAI

    NTS &

    APP

    EALS

    DISC

    LOSU

    RE o

    f

    INFO

    RMAT

    ION

    CONFIDENCE &

    TRUST

    Contact Point

    Conformity Assessment

    Service Provider

  • CGMES conformity assessment

    • CGMES Conformity Assessment Framework approved – April 2014; documentationpublished on 10 June 2014.

    Preparation stage

    • Suppliers implement an approved version of the standard (CGMES)

    • TSOs request this implementation as it is needed for the business processes

    First party assessment

    • Suppliers test their applications to be able to issue a Declaration of conformity to answer users (TSOs & ENTSO-E) requirements

    • Issue a Declaration of Conformity and submit to ENTSO-E – to be available on the web site

    Second party assessment

    • ENTSO-E assesses the conformity

    • ENTSO-E issues an Attestation of Conformity only if the assessment is positive

    Detailed information is available here Different conformity levels – per functionality to provide the best possible service. There is

    no requirement one application to support the full scope of the CGMES. Objective to have better tested Applications available for TSOs’ and ENTSO-E’s business

    processes.

    https://www.entsoe.eu/major-projects/common-information-model-cim/cim-for-grid-models-exchange/cgmes-conformity/Pages/default.aspx

  • Test Configurations Specifications developed in 2013; tender process in 2014 => vendors selected to develop

    and review

    List of Test Configuration and status

    MicroGrid – about 16 nodes

    MiniGrid – according to IEC60909 – mainly for short circuit;

    RealGrid – big model about 7000 nodes;

    SmallGrid – about 120 nodes;

    BigGrid – not yet ready

    Dynamics – small models to test parts of the dynamics package. Some models available, but not now the priority on conformity is put for the rest of the CGMES profiles. In addition, there is parallel work stream to fine tune the dynamics profile.

  • Conformity assessment•3 important components:

    Test Use Cases (TUC)

    Test Steps (TS)

    Conformity Categories

    •It is not easy:

    •The challenge to have something which is valid for all possible business processes; for all possible Applications

    •The challenge to have something which is easy and attractive but at the same time credible.

    •What are the right test use cases for the full scope of CGMES?; what are the right test use cases for a given category?....

  • Test Use Cases (TUC)

    The test use cases do not necessarily reflect how the business processes are using data exchange functionalities defined in the CGMES

    For each TUC a sequence of actions to be executed in order to cover a TUC is defined

    There are 46 TUC defined as of now

  • Test Steps (TS)

    There are 12 Test steps defined as of now

    Each Test step has a sequence of actions that should be performed on a Test Configuration.

    Pass/Fail score is given according to the assessment criteria defined in the TS definitions

  • Conformity Categories

  • Standard Category

    The “Standard” category is the highest category which measures the overall support of CGMES by an Application. The category has three grades:

    Gold (Full support) – shall be granted to an Application that passes all TUC defined for CGMES conformity assessment;

    Silver (Support) – shall be granted to an Application that passes all TUC marked as “Silver” and “Bronze” across all functions defined for CGMES conformity assessment;

    Bronze (Limited support) – shall be granted to an Application that passes all mandatory (marked with “Bronze”) TUC defined for at least one profile or function.

  • Profile Category

    The “Profile” category indicates which CGMES profiles are supported by an Application. The category has three grades:

    Gold (Full support) – shall be granted to an Application that passes all TUC defined for the following CGMES function categories: Import and Export. The Application supports this profile in combination with other CGMES profiles supported by the Application;

    Silver (Support) – shall be granted to an Application that passes all TUC defined for the following CGMES function categories: Import and Export;

    Bronze (Limited support) – shall be granted to an Application that passes all TUC defined for the following CGMES function categories: Import or Export.

  • Function Category

    The “Function” category indicates the level of functional support of CGMES by an Application. The category has three grades:

    Gold (Full support) – shall be granted to an Application that passes all TUC defined for a CGMES function for the profiles supported by the Application;

    Silver (Support) – shall be granted to an Application that passes all TUC marked as “Silver” and “Bronze” for a CGMES function for the profiles supported by the Application;

    Bronze (Limited support) – shall be granted to an Application that passes all TUC marked as “Bronze” for a CGMES function for the profiles supported by the Application.

    Data management Data visualisation Power system analysis

    Import Export Update andRepository

    Diagram layout Geographical(GIS) location

    Load flow (Node-breaker inputrepresentation)

    Load flow (Bus-branch inputrepresentation)

    Dynamics Short circuit

  • Function Category - Matrix

  • Schedule 2014 on Conformity Assessment Scheme - Version 1.0.0

    10 June: Publication of the Conformity Assessment Scheme package (testconfigurations, text procedures, templates) for CGMES conformity assessment.

    12 June at 17:00 CET: Information webinar for suppliers on the CGMES Conformityassessment. Recording available on the ENTSO-E web site

    17 June: Deadline for providing feedback on the published documentation.

    23 June: Publication of updated package, in case any modifications are necessary.

    10 July: Deadline for suppliers to submit to ENTSO-E their Declaration ofConformity in order to participate in the Review Session part of the IOP on July 14.The Declaration of Conformity will be made publicly available on the ENTSO-E website.

    Week of 14 July: Review session where applications for which suppliers issuedDeclaration of Conformity will be assessed by the ENTSO-E.

    By August: A first list of Suppliers which get Attestation of Conformity will bepublished on the ENTSO-E website.

  • Source of information

    EMAIL: [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]