centre for higher and adult education (chae) promoting teaching and learning scholarship through...
TRANSCRIPT
Centre for Higher and Adult Education (CHAE)Centre for Higher and Adult Education (CHAE)
Promoting teaching and learning scholarship
through postgraduate studies in the field of
higher education
Conference on the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning22-23 May 2007
Prof Eli M. Bitzer & Dr Ruth M. AlbertynCentre for Higher and Adult EducationStellenbosch University, South Africa
2
Introduction
• Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) has been researched in many different ways and contexts (Boyer 1990; Davis & Chandler 1998; Jenkins & Healy 2005; Bitzer 2006)
• One area relatively unexplored is whether formalpostgraduate studies in the field of highereducation and in teaching and learning in
particular contribute to the SoTL
3
Introduction (cont.)
• The Faculty of Education at StellenboschUniversity offers two postgraduate programmesin the field of higher education: The MPhil(Higher Education) and the PhD• More than 50 students, comprising mostlyacademic staff from higher education institutionsand including staff from Stellenbosch University,have graduated from these programmes in thepast number of years
4
Aims
• To provide a brief outline of what these
programmes entail • To report on data obtained from
graduates in an open-ended question of whether studies in higher education had assisted their professional and scholarly growth, particularly in the area of the SoTL
5
Outline of MPhil Higher Education
Primary aim: to equip students with scholarly knowledge,
skills and attitudes to function optimally, as professional learning facilitators, in their respective higher education institutions
Secondary aim: to facilitate research knowledge and skills with
students to assist them in conducting educational research in the subjects/fields they teach or work
Generic learning outcomes: self-management, problem solving, critical evaluation, effective communication and systemic thought
6
• Interpret and evaluate national and international perspectives on higher education;
• Demonstrate insight into how student learning takes place and how facilitation of learning influences higher education outcomes;
• Analyse, critique and improve own curriculum planning and implementation;
• Appreciate the role of the higher education teacher against background of forms of scholarship;
• Plan, execute and evaluate learning facilitation;
Outcomes
7
Outcomes (cont.)• Know and apply research traditions and
effectively use research methodology in field of higher education;
• Use technology as medium of support and delivery in higher education;
• Know and use assessment and evaluation techniques in higher education;
• Plan and utilise staff evaluation and -development strategies, especially concerning effectiveness of teaching and learning; and
• Demonstrate knowledge of and perspectives on leadership and leadership development in a higher education environment.
8
Structure and credit valueModule Topic Credit value
YEAR ONE
1 Perspectives in higher education 10
2 Student learning in higher education 10
3 Foundations of research 10
4 Research in higher education 15
5 Curriculum and programme design in higher education
15
6 Assessment and evaluation in higher education
15
7 Teaching in higher education 15
YEAR TWO
8 Scholarship in higher education ** 15
9 Technology in higher education ** 15
10 Staff development in higher education ** 15
11 Leadership in higher education ** 15
12 Research thesis*** 120
TOTAL 240
* Not all modules are offered every year. Modules are offered every alternative year.** A selection of two modules from 8, 9, 10 or 11** The main part of the thesis is usually written in the second semester of the second year
9
Target group & admission requirements
Target group:• lecturers,• facilitators of learning and• Staff developers and educational leaders of higher
education institutions. Admission requirements:• an Honours degree in any field, and currently employed
in higher education environment; or • any other academic-professional combination of studies
equal to an Honours degree (Senate approved), and currently employed in a higher education environment; or
• evidence that candidate has reached standard of competence in higher education, demonstrated through the process of evaluation of prior learning and Senate approved.
10
Assessment
Formative/continuous assessment methods:
• Assignments completed within students’ institutional contexts for each module (1-11);
• Group activities and tasks for each of the 11 modules during a two-week residential period at the beginning of each year;
• Learning sessions, facilitated by students during the residential period; and
• Self-reflective statements spanning the total time of study.
11
Assessment (cont.)
Final assessment includes the following:• A thesis on chosen topic focusing on a higher
education issue• An oral examination on the submitted thesis
(The thesis can, alternatively, be replaced by a research portfolio consisting of case-studies and research reports culminating in at least two publishable academic articles)
12
Programme facilitation• Eleven modules are presented over a period of two years• A short and compulsory residential period of two weeks,
usually in February, introduces each study year• Students are required to attend and participate in all modules
during the residential period• Students can choose two from the final four modules to
complete assignments on• The rest of the programme is presented via distance
education (assignments and electronic and postal feedback)• Learning is facilitated via structured study materials, written
assignments and feedback, as well as telephonic and electronic contact
• When students do their research thesis, a research proposal has to be approved and regular meetings between students and supervisors are scheduled
13
The PhD (in Higher Education)
• Admission: A Master’s in any field (or equivalent via RPL) and involved in higher education (teaching, development or management)
• Additional work (e.g. Social Research modules) might be required before admission in some cases
• Research proposal approved via Faculty of Education
• Research dissertation• Oral examination on the dissertation
14
Programme staff
• Academic staff from the Centre for Higher and Adult Education, Department of Curriculum Studies in the Faculty of Education facilitate programmes and provide study supervision
• Various guest lecturers, including local academics and academics from abroad, contribute to the programme and offer a wide variety of experience and perspectives
15
Exit questionnaire
• Aim: to investigate experiences of postgraduate MPhil or PhD students in the Department of Curriculum Studies (Centre for Higher and Adult Education) between 2001 and 2006
• Sample: students registered between 2001 and 2006 (graduated and discontinued-78 students)
• Measuring instrument:• Based on questionnaire designed for previous study (Centre for
Higher and Adult Education)• Adaptations made to include constructs identified in the studies
of Manathunga, (2005), McCormack (2005) and Lindén (1999) • Peer reviewed• Biographical, study information, Likert-scale questions on
students' needs and supervision needs, and open-ended questions on students' postgraduate experience
16
Findings: 2001-2006
MPhil H.E. PhDGraduated
n 15 15
Ave years registered 4.5 3.6
Suspendedn 12 5
Ave years registered 3.3 3
Current (registered in 2007)
n 12 12
Ave years registered 2.8 3.2
17
Findings
Reason for studying• Knowledge• Scholarship• Qualification• Facilitation skills• Employer imperative• Interest
18
Influence of studies on professional development
Legitimacy Credibility
Esteem from colleagues
Better team playerPromotion
Work opportunities Increased income Facilitation skills
Presentation skills Management Preparation of
programmes for HE
Academic writing
Conceptual
Logical reasoning
Integration
Synthesis
Research skills
Data analysis
Interpretation
Analytical skills
Critical thinking
Creativity
Self-confidence Assertiveness Ability to work
under pressure Value hard work
Discipline Perseverance Commitment
MotivationDetermination
Flexibility More balanced
Workplace SkillsPersonal World view
Broader frame
of reference
19
Evidence of scholarship of teaching
1.Systematically investigate questions related to practice beyond the classroom (Hutchings & Shulman 1999)
• “better understanding of the changing landscape of higher education environment”
• “I have a much wider frame of reference with regards to education and training issues”
• “Research develops the ability for creative thinking and enquiry, learning which skills are required to
function effectively in the fast paced technological era we live in”
20
Evidence of scholarship of teaching (cont.)
2. Enticing future scholars- continual process (Boyer 1990; Rice 1992; Glassick, Huber & Maerhoff 1997; Shulman 2004)
• "I feel like studying throughout my life”
• “…knowledge that I must continuously keep abreast of current development in my field”
• “The postgraduate studies have given me new insight into the whole process of doing research.
I am better equipped to assist students intending to do research at my institution”
21
3. Reflection of practice and making teaching processes public (Queens University, California 2003)
• “Attended a few local conferences and became part of an academic network”
• “I developed confidence in my profession and I'm in a position to share my knowledge based on proven theories, because I practice what I
preach on a daily basis. My peers and colleagues show respect, because they benefit
from the knowledge I gained since I share it with them”
Evidence of scholarship of teaching (cont.)
22
4. Forming new conceptions of teaching and learning (Trigwell, Martin & Prosser 2000)
• “enabled me to do my teaching job better and with more knowledge”
• “ I have improved my strategies of dealing with learners’ and educators’ problems”
Evidence of scholarship of teaching (cont.)
23
5. Improvement of SoTL through experimentation and evaluation (Tait 2005)
• “I was able to become more involved in the research area through workshop presentations”
• “I've been drawn in to projects that previously I know I would not have been
part of”
Evidence of scholarship of teaching (cont.)
24
Conclusions
• Results indicate that postgraduate studies in higher education benefit academic staff in a number of ways
• Limiting factors identified through this study need to be considered when academic staff aim to improve their standing regarding the SoTL via formal qualifications
Evidence suggests that promotion of the
scholarship of teaching and learning can be
enhanced through a formal postgraduate
qualification in higher education