center for technology in government
DESCRIPTION
Center for Technology in Government by Dr. Theresa PardoTRANSCRIPT
Dr. Theresa A. Pardo Center for Technology in Government
University at Albany, State University of New Yorkwww.ctg.albany.edu
[email protected] +1 518-442-3892
CTG fosters public sector innovation, enhances capability, generates public value, and supports good governance.
Thought leadership in Public Sector ICT Innovation
• Building research and practice partnerships– to define information and technology related problems,
challenges, and opportunities.– to provide innovative policy leadership and practice
guidance to ensure success in the complex world of government information technology.
– to solve critical problems facing government agencies working separately or together to share information and create levels of capability to interoperate across the boundaries of government organizations and national borders.
– to plan strategies and assess impact of those strategies; open government, social media, mobility, cloud computing, and more.
Core research and practice competencies
• Open Government Planning and Public Value Assessment• Understanding Value and Risk in Public Sector IT
Investments • Building Intergovernmental Collaborations • Information Sharing and Integration • Interoperability • Social Media – Policy for government • Social Media – As a service deliver platform• Building a Case for Strategic Technology Innovation• Capability Assessment and Action Planning• XML as a Website Content Management Tool• Critical Decision Making During Crisis • Transnational Public Sector Knowledge Networks
Venues for Research
Improvements in Practice
Practice innovations through research partnerships
Practical Problems of Government
Practitioner skill and knowledge
Academic skill and knowledge
“What is technically possible may not be organizationally feasible
or politically or socially desirable.”
“Advanced IT applications in government must integrate
policies, processes, information, and technology.”
CTGAddressing the quintessential underlying
problems of ICT use in government
CTG Enhancing Capability
• CTG’s Open Government Public Value Assessment Tool (PVAT)
• CTG’s Eight Essential Elements of Social Media Policy
Building an Open Government Plan A Public Value-Based Strategy
Question of Interest
Does our open government plan, taken as a whole, optimize our resources and
capabilities, and maximum public value to all citizens and stakeholders?
A common view of public returnsThe
Investment
A Better World
Good things happen
Good things happen
Traditional v. Public ROI
Public measures: many more social and political returns are possible
Government measures
• cost savings• budget increases• productivity
gains• service quality• cost-
effectiveness• strategic
position
Foundations of a Public Value View
Two major kinds of public value:•The value to the public that results from
improving the government as a public asset•The value that results from delivering specific benefits directly to persons or groups
The public value point of view:•Assessing public returns should reveal
value in terms of stakeholder interests
CTG’s Open Government Portfolio Public
Value Assessment Tool (PVAT)
• A tool designed to support open government planning by offering a systematic approach to identifying the public value of an agency's or government’s open government portfolio.
Lessons Learned – Why create PVAT? Agency challenges in: • linking high level principles of participation, collaboration,
and transparency to specific stakeholders and values to strategic agency missions
• prioritizing ongoing and planned initiatives based on the stakeholders they serve and the value proposition for each
• re-tooling information lifecycle from collection, management, use, and dissemination to support OG initiatives
• developing concrete plans for internal change to support new skills and requirements to support
OG opportunities
PVAT In Use – Creating Value PVAT used to guide the United States Department of
Transportation’s Open Government Planning Process
“Using the PVAT we looked in a new way at our open government portfolio to see how our investments in openness and transparency could create value for a wide range of DOT stakeholders.”
– H. Giovanni Carnaroli, Associate Chief Information Officer (CIO) for Business-Technology Alignment and Governance at the U.S. Department of Transportation.
Public Value Types• Economic: income, asset values, liabilities, entitlements,
risks to these.• Political: personal or corporate influence on government
& politics.• Social: family or community relationships, social mobility,
status, identity.• Quality of life: security, health, recreation, personal
liberty • Strategic: economic or political advantage or
opportunities, goals, resources for innovation or planning.• Ideological: alignment of beliefs, moral or ethical values
with government actions or outcomes.• Stewardship: public’s view of government officials as
faithful stewards.
Public Value Generators
• Efficiency• Effectiveness• Intrinsic enhancements• Transparency• Participation• Collaboration
Systematic Approach to OG
STEP 1 STEP 5
Initiative Description:
· Title · Purpose· Supporting
strategic goals· Program or policy
area· Tactics
Describe Initiative
Review Open Government Public
Value Portfolio
· Review public value assessments across all initiatives to inform decision making.
· Does our open government portfolio, taken as a whole, optimize our resources and capabilities while meeting our mission and delivering maximum public value to all stakeholders?
STEP 6
· Establish a summary assessment for the initiative for each public value type across all the primary stakeholders
· All summary assessments are populated into the Portfolio Review Workbook
(Step 6)
· Identify a full list of initiative stakeholders
· Prioritize by rating each stakeholder as A, B, or C
Identify and Prioritize
Stakeholders
STEP 2
Initiative One-Five Workbooks
· Identify the type and level of Public Value the initiative is expected to create for each of the primary stakeholders
Public Value is expressed in terms of: · Economic value · Social Value · Political Value· Strategic Value· Quality of Life
Value · Ideological Value · Stewardship
Value
Identify and Rate the Public Value
STEP 3
· For each stakeholder and each change mechanism describe how the expected value will be produced
Change mechanisms include impacts on: · Efficiency· Effectiveness· Intrinsic
Enhancement · Transparency· Collaboration· Participation
Identify Mechanisms of
Change
STEP 4
Summarize the Public Value Assessments
Portfolio Review Workbook
Support Choice Making About Investments in OG
CTG’s Open Government Portfolio Public Value Assessment Tool (PVAT)
• Over 300 individual downloads by over: – 10 Countries– 20 US Federal Agencies – 50 US County and municipal agencies – 70 Non-governmental and research
organizations – 15 Consulting companies
CTG’s Open Government Portfolio Public Value Assessment Tool (PVAT)
• Learning more and working with CTG– Formal Training Program.– Custom Training Program.– Hands on support from CTG in the form of
consultations with planning teams as well as management of planning and assessment processes.
Social Media, Citizen Engagement, and Government
Government social media trends
Source: Pew Research Center, How Americans Interact with Government Online, April 2010
• Reaching citizens– 46 percent of respondents see it as important for government to post
information and alerts on sites like Facebook or Twitter
• Interacting and communicating– 13% of internet users read a blog of a government agency or official,
and 2% have posted a comment – 5% of internet users followed a government agency or official on a
social networking site, only 1% of internet users have posted comments – 2% of internet users followed a government agency or official on Twitter
(this represents 7% of Twitter users)
• Perception– 41% of people agree that such services are a waste of government
money
Source: Eight Essential Elements of Social Media Policy, Center for Technology in Government, 2009
CTG’s Eight Essential Elements of Social Media Policy
• CTG’s Eight Essential Elements Report used around the world to inform social media policy development processes.
27
United States DOT Uses CTG’s Eight Essential Elements to United States DOT Uses CTG’s Eight Essential Elements to Structure Social Media Policy Development Process Structure Social Media Policy Development Process
• DOT’s Open Government Plan imposed a Fall 2010 deadline for the DOT to develop its first social media policy.
• The total time to develop the policy was 6 months.• An interdisciplinary working group of 30 DOT employees
participated.
July 2010June 2010 August 2010 Sept/Oct 2010 November 2010
28
CIOP Social Media Policy Covers
Employee Access
Official Use
Professional Use
Personal Use
Account Management
Official Use
Professional/ Personal Use
Acceptable Use
All Use
Employee Conduct
Official Use
Professional/ Personal Use
Security
Citizen Conduct
Official Use
Legal
Official Use
Professional/ Personal Use
Acceptable Apps
Official Use
Professional Use
Personal Use
Public Affairs led the drafting of policy statements
Social Media Policy Working Group Drafted
All Use
General Counsel led the drafting of policy statements
OCIO led the drafting of policy statements
Drafting Policy StatementsDrafting Policy Statements
Citizen Conduct
Professional/ Personal Use
Content
Professional Use
Personal Use
Official Use
29
Drafting Roles and ResponsibilitiesDrafting Roles and Responsibilities
• The Working Group used a Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed (RACI) Matrix to determine what individuals, offices and governance bodies would oversee each policy statement.
• Responsible parties spanned the OCIO (CISO, CTO, ACIO for Policy Oversight), General Counsel, Public Affairs, Human Resources, and the modal equivalents of those offices.
• These roles and responsibilities were then included in the draft policy.
30
Coordinating Policies in the DOTCoordinating Policies in the DOTDuration: Flexible Duration: Two Weeks Duration: Two Weeks
Upon completion of reviews, DOT CIO performs final review and approvals
CTG’s Eight Essential Elements and CTG’s Eight Essential Elements and DOT Social Media Policy: DOT Social Media Policy:
A policy development partnershipA policy development partnership• Covers all DOT Employees• Specifies an approval process for official
accounts• Lists specific account management
requirements• Requires an approved tools list to be
developed by the OCIO• Requires tool specific guidance to be
developed separately—the policy covers high level requirements for records management, accessibility, PRA, intellectual property, and advertisements.
31
CTG’s Social Media PolicyEight Essential Elements
• Learning more and working with CTG– Formal Training Program.– Custom Training Programs.– Hands on support from CTG in the form of
consultations with policy development teams as well as implementation planning and impact assessment processes.
Fostering InnovationBuilding Capability
• Open Government Portfolio Public Value Assessment Tool (PVAT)
• All CTG Open Government Related Publications
• Designing social media policy for government: Eight essential elements
• CTG’s Publications and Reports• CTG’s Annual Report
CTG fosters public sector innovation, enhances capability, generates public value, and supports good governance.
Dr. Theresa A. Pardo Center for Technology in Government
University at Albany, State University of New Yorkwww.ctg.albany.edu
[email protected] +1 518-442-3892