center for integrated nanostructure physics (cinap) · center for integrated nanostructure physics...
TRANSCRIPT
Center for Integrated Nanostructure Physics (CINAP)
- Institute for Basic Science (IBS) was launched in 2012 by
the Korean government to promote basic science in Korea
- Our Center was established in 2012 at SKKU
- Focus on growth of 2D materials (Gr, BN, TMD, and others)
and explore unprecedented physical and chemical
properties including carrier dynamics and thermoelectrics
- Seven tenure tracks, 30 postdocs & research professors
- About 100 graduate students
- New building (~9000 m2) in July, 2015
CINAP Periodic table: 2D layered materials
sp2
sp2
- Metal, insulator, semiconductors (small or large Eg)
- Vertical stacking
- New tunneling vertical devices
- New optoelectronic/magnetic properties
- Flexible, transparent
New material and physics world in 2D !!!!
What could we do with layered structures of materials with just the right layers? -Feynman
(SKKU) (SKKU) Nat. Photon. 8, 899-907 (2014)
Atomic layered materials
(SKKU) (SKKU)
Vertical structure
A. K. Geim et al. Nature 499, 419 (2013)
New device structures by van der Waals stacking
(SKKU) (SKKU)
What is new in 2D?
Strong Coulomb interaction or less charge screening
Coulomb interaction
(SKKU) (SKKU)
Excitons at room temperature
Large exciton binding energy
- Emergence of excitons at room temperature
: Ebx ~ 1 eV
- Emergence of multiexcitons at room temperature
: trions, Ebtri ~ Eb
x + 30 ~ 40 meV
: biexcitons, Ebbi ~ Eb
tri + 30 meV 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1
VG (V)
-70
-50
-30
-10
10
30
50
70
0.5 W
AX
ATA
XX
PL (
a.u
.)
50 W
Photon energy (eV)
500 W
H. S. Lee et al. PRL, ASAP
(SKKU) (SKKU)
Layer dependence
Band structures: Indirect bandgap (ML) => direct bandgap (1L)
(SKKU)
CINAP
(a,b) Li, H. et al. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 1385–1390
(c,d) Eda, G. et al. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 5111–5116
a
d c
b
Excitation with 514 nm laser
Optical properties
(SKKU) (SKKU)
Layer dependence Transport properties
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
t ~ 3.5 nm
t ~ 8 nm
t ~ 13 nm
F
E (
cm
2/V
s)
Rs (
)V
BG(V)
300K
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
Al
• Type conversion with flake thickness: n-type to ambipolar
• Graphene-like electron and hole mobilities
• Mobility increases in proportion to film thickness
• Bandgap shrinkage and surface scattering reduction
D. Perrelo et al., Nature Comm. 6, 1-8 (2015) Al contact for n-type Tr
Vsd = 0.2 V
→ 1 V
Al
-20 0 20 40 6010
-10
10-9
10-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
tox
= 300 nm
SS ~ 9 V/dec
I sd (
A)
VBG
(V)
300K
0
300
600
900
1200
F
E (
cm
2/V
s)
T = 300K
(SKKU) (SKKU)
Layer dependence
Structural phase transition
(SKKU) (SKKU)
CINAP Why MoS2?
- Reduced charge screening
- High mobility ~200 cm2 V-1s-1 (MoS2)
- Optical properties:
Indirect bandgap (bulk) => direct bandgap (1L)
Wide range of bandgap (1.0 ~ 2.5 eV)
- Various phases exist
- Tailoring such phases is a big challenge
- MoS2 phase transition:
2H (semicond) => 1T (metal)
by Li intercalation
- Difficult to realize
- Severe lattice distortion
- Local phenomena
H. Wang et al., PNAS 11, 19701 (2013)
Google.com
(SKKU) (SKKU)
CINAP Why MoTe2?
Similar to MoS2 but…..
- Bandgap : ~ 1 eV, similar to Si
- good for energy harvesting
- good for TFET
- Cohesive energy difference between 2H
and 1T is smaller than that of MoS2
- Rich physics: CDW, superconductivity…
(SKKU)
CINAP
Nature Comm. 5, 4214 (2014)
Polymorph engineering of MoTe2
Phase stability
-> Polymorph engineering is easier in MoTe2
Cohesive energy of MOTe2
1T
1T'
2H
Neutral -0.2 +0.2
Doping per unit cell (e)
0
1.0
ΔE p
er
unit c
ell
(eV)
0.5
(SKKU)
Single crystal MoTe2 by flux method
1T’
2H
Single crystal growth (flux method): mix Mo and Te powder with sodium flux & sintering
5 1/nm
1 nm
3 nm-1
(100)
(010)
3 nm-1
(100)
(010)
1 nm
TEM comparison
2H-MoTe2 1T’-MoTe2
(SKKU) (SKKU)
Peierls distortion ->Band inversion
Hexagonal Octahedral Distorted octahedral
Structures of MoTe2
Semiconductor Metal Small bandgap metal
1T’ phase is more stable than 1T phase!
2H 1T 1T’
D. H. Keum & S. Y. Cho et al., Nature Phys. 11, 482 (2015)
(SKKU) (SKKU)
Inte
nsi
ty (
a. u.)
2θ (degree) 20.0 40.0 60.0
(0 0 2) (0 0 4)
(0 0 6) (0 0 8)
(0 0 2)
(0 0 4)
(0 0 6)
(0 0 8)
2H-MoTe2
1T’-MoTe2
25 26 27
10 20 30 40 50 60
2θ (degree) 2θ (degree)
400 °C
500 °C
600 °C
640 °C 680 °C
720 °C
(0 0
4)
(0 0
4)
2H
1T’
Temperature-dependent XRD
Structural phase transition by temperature -> absence of Te deficiency -> reversible phase transition
(SKKU) (SKKU)
0 10 20 30 40
162
164
166
258
260
262
264
Inte
nsi
ty (
a. u.)
150 300 200 250
Bg (cm
-1)
Ag (cm
-1)
Abso
rbance
(a.u
.)
50 60 70 80 90
3L
4L
9L
Energy (meV)
Peak position
Ag Bg
11L
Ag
Bg
Layer number
0
0.5
1.0
Raman shift (cm-1)
0 5 10 15 20 25
170
172
230
232
234
Inte
nsi
ty (
a. u.)
150 300 200 250
A1g (c
m-1)
E2g (c
m-1)
Abso
rbance
(a.u
.)
0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
1L
2L
3L
Energy (eV)
Peak position
E2g A1g
4L Layer number
0
0.5
1.0
Raman shift (cm-1)
E2g
A1g
Raman & absorption spectroscopy
2H-MoTe2 1T’-MoTe2
-> Sign of small bandgap in monoclinic TMDs -> New results on Raman and absorption spectroscopy in 1T’-MoTe2
D. H. Keum & S. Y. Cho et al., Nature Phys. 11, 482 (2015)
Few-layer MoTe2
Large spin-orbit coupling
2H-MoTe2
band splitting in VBM at K
- SOC effect
Γ M K Γ
En
erg
y (
eV
)
2H 1T’
(SKKU) (SKKU)
Electrical properties
0 100 200 300
Temperature (K)
100
102
Mobili
ty (
cm2V
-1s-
1)
1T’-MoTe2
104
Carrier mobility of 1T’-MoTe2
4000 cm2V-1S-1 @ 1.8 K
S (
μV/K
)
100
200
300
300 340 380 T (K)
2H-MoTe2
1T’-MoTe2
Seebeck constants of MoTe2
-> High carrier mobility at low temperature -> High power factor : 0.04 ~ 11 mW/mK2
(4 mW/mK2 : state-of-the-art thermoelectric materials)
(SKKU) (SKKU)
α-M
oTe
2
β-M
oTe
2
2H
-MoTe
2
1T’-M
oTe
2
mix
ed
750
900
1000
1100
988
820
650
500
880
Tem
pera
ture
(°C
)
1180
ASM Database Our work
66 68
Te (%)
65 67 66.7
x
x
x
x
x x
x
x
x
x x
x x x
x
x
x
x x x
x
x
excessive deficient
Bulk 1T’-MoTe2
Few-layered 1T’-MoTe2
2H-MoTe2
1T’-MoTe2
2H-MoTe2
ln σ
(a. u.)
10000/T (K-1)
Arrhenius plot
Electronic phase transition in MoTe2
D. H. Keum & S. Y. Cho et al., Nature Phys. 11, 482 (2015)
(SKKU) (SKKU)
CINAP Ohmic contact in 2D??
H. Wang et al., PNAS 11, 19701 (2013)
- Ohmic contact in Si: Ion implantation
- Ohmic contact in 2D?
- ion implantation damages 2D layer
- metal/2D: weak van der Waals interface
=> side contact to provoke covalent bonds?
- phase transition from 2H to 1T
by Li intercalation in MoS2
- phase transition by light irradiation
- BN to modulate Schottky barrier??
(SKKU) (SKKU)
250 300 200 150 100
Raman shift (cm-1)
Inte
nsi
ty (
a. u.)
Ag(1T’)
Ag(1T’)
(1)
(2)
(4) Ag (1T’)
E2g(2H) Ag(2H)
E2g(2H) Ag(2H)
E2g(2H) Ag(2H)
Ag(1T’)
(3)
SiO2 SiO2 SiO2
Laser
SiO2
Laser 1T’
1T’
2H
-MoTe
2
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Light-induced phase transition in MoTe2
S. Cho et al., Science 349, 625 (2015)
Laser irradiation at a chosen local area
=> Phase control with 1 μm spatial resolution
- Laser thinning
- Phase conversion to 1T’
2H 1T’
1T’
2μm 2μm 2H
1T’
2H
Light illumination!!
(SKKU) (SKKU)
2H contact Φb~200 meV
1T’ contact Φb~10 meV
10000/T (K-1)
ln σ
(a. u.)
24 32 40
-27
-25
-23 VSD=1 V, VG =0 V
Temperature (K) 200 300 400 500
10
1
Mobili
ty (
cm2V
-1s-
1)
1T’ contact μ~50 cm2V-1s-1
2H contact μ~1 cm2V-1s-1
H (
nm
)
0
4
Distance (μm) 0 4 2
2
102
1T’
2H
Cr/Au (source)
2H
Cr/Au (source)
Cr/Au (drain)
Cr/Au (drain)
Laser-patterned Ohmic junction in MoTe2
-> New ohmic contact formed at the junction
Laser patterning on transistor
(only at source/drain area) Local 1T’ at S & D
Laser thinning
S. Cho et al., Science 349, 625 (2015)
(SKKU)
CINAP
Key findings
- Reversible Structural Phase Transition
- Bandgap Opening in 1T’-MoTe2 by ‘Spin-Orbit Coupling’
- Local Phase Transition -> Ohmic contact in 2D
- Room-Temperature Phase Transition by Small Strain
Summary & Future works
Future projects
- Superconductivity in MoTe2
- Bandgap ~ 1 eV => Photovoltaic, Optoelectronic devices
- Vertical tunneling device
0 1 2 3
0
1
2
Resis
tance (
mO
hm
)
Temperature (K)
0T
5mT
10mT
20mT
100mT
300mT
500mT
(SKKU) (SKKU)
Environmental susceptability
Physical and chemical properties can be
easily modulated by environment
(SKKU) (SKKU)
Bandgap is strongly modulated with local strain in MoS2 !
SiO2
HOPG
Roughness ~ 1 nm
B. G. Shin et al., submitted!
Strain effect
(SKKU) (SKKU)
80% area is converted to indirect bandgap from direct bandgap!
B. G. Shin et al., submitted!
(SKKU)
CINAP Room-temperature phase transition
S. H. Song et al., submitted
First-order M-I transition at RT can be induced by small tensile strain (0.2%)
Tensile strain
Fully reversible upon release
1100 K at zero strain
=> 300 K at 0.2% tensile strain
High phase transition T to low phase transition T???
(SKKU) (SKKU)
Dielectric constant modulation
Lin et al., NanoLett. 14, 5569 (2014)
From the renormalization group theory:
Elias et al., Nature Physics 2011
(SKKU) (SKKU)
Work function of MoS2 is modulated by O2 adsorption/desorption!
0 5 10 15 30 35 40 45
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
With O2
(4.47 eV)
CP
D (
V)
Time (min)
UHV
(4.05 eV)
+ O2
e
0 10 20 80 90 100 110 120 130
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
UHV
(4.04 eV)
CP
D (
V)
Time (min)
In air
(4.36 eV)
Pumping out
a
c d
High density monolayer MoS2
on SiO2
MoS2
KFM Tip
+ _
~ VAC(Tip)
VDC(Tip)
+
_
VDC(Si)
b
S. Y. Lee et al., submitted
: 0.4 eV, similar to graphene
Work function modulation
(SKKU) (SKKU)
van der Waals stacking
Quantum mechanical phenomena
(SKKU) (SKKU)
gn
ndx
dn
dx
dDn
dt
d
2
2Continuity
equation
1L-MoS2 vs 6L-MoS2
Multi-layer charge transport
0 1 2 3 4 5 60.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
No
rma
lize
d e
xc
ite
d
ca
rrie
r d
en
sit
y (n
x/
n0)
Moving distance (nm)
6L-MoS2
1L-MoS2?
Tunneling probability
Monolayer charge transport
hv
1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8
0
20
40
60
80
100
IQE
(%
)
Photon energy (eV)
1L-MoS2
6L-MoS2xAeA 2
W. J. Yu et al., submitted
(SKKU)
Thermoelectric Properties (Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3)
Poudel, Science (2008) Nanocomposite
Dimensionless Figure of Merit, zT
S. I. Kim et al., Science 348, 109-114 (2015)
zT = S2 / T
World-best record
for RT TE!
(SKKU)
Synthesis of 2D materials
- Multilayer hBN is also available
=> on SiO2/Si, unpublished
=> on Fe : Nature Comm., ASAP
- on Pt: Large area monolayer hBN, ACS NANO 8, 8520 (2014)
- on Au: mm-size monolayer singlecrystalline hBN, unpublished
- Large-area, monolayer monocrystalline graphene
(Adv. Mat. 27, 1376 (2015))
- Large-area, AB stacking bilayer graphene (unpublished)
- Large-area, monolayer MoS2, seed growth by CVD
(Nature Comm. (2015))
-Large-area monolayer WSe2 on Au substrate by CVD
(ACS Nano 9, 5510 (2015)
- Seed growth for MX2 (M: Mo, W, X: S, Se) (unpublished)
- Thin MoTe2 film from Mo metal
(ACS Nano 9, 6548 (2015))
(SKKU) (SKKU)
Summary
There is a plenty of room
for new phenomena in
2D materials!
van der Waals engineering!