celine laurenceau, michael heald and julien fanon · 11. salim ismail, “exponential...

8
CELINE LAURENCEAU, MICHAEL HEALD AND JULIEN FANON

Upload: others

Post on 13-Aug-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CELINE LAURENCEAU, MICHAEL HEALD AND JULIEN FANON · 11. Salim Ismail, “Exponential Organizations: Why New Organizations Are Ten Times Better, Faster, and Cheaper than Yours (and

CELINE LAURENCEAU, MICHAEL HEALD AND JULIEN FANON

Page 2: CELINE LAURENCEAU, MICHAEL HEALD AND JULIEN FANON · 11. Salim Ismail, “Exponential Organizations: Why New Organizations Are Ten Times Better, Faster, and Cheaper than Yours (and

Large Australian organizations could be wasting a significant growth opportunity because of their inability to effectively collaborate with startups.

These David-Goliath culture gaps between the two types of organizations are a major obstacle. But it is also important to recognize and address the hidden internal culture gaps between the hierarchical layers in a large organization. These two kinds of gaps don’t have to kill collaboration. When managed properly, organizations can bridge the divide, learn from each other, and drive benefits well beyond the initial technological and market gains. At stake: an estimated AU$2 trillion in potential business opportunities globally.1

In one market after another, established organizations have been striking deals with innovative startups. In the healthcare industry, leading pharmaceutical companies have regularly collaborated in drug discovery with biotech startups. In the financial sector, incumbent firms have been partnering with FinTech entrants for access to blockchain and other cutting-edge technologies. For example, the Commonwealth Bank of Australia engages with FinTech startups around projects to address specific customer issues, combining what startups bring to the table along with the Commonwealth Bank’s own assets.2

Indeed, in today’s increasingly interconnected business environment, organizations compete within large ecosystems and collaborate with a variety of firms, from the tiniest startups to the largest global conglomerates. These collaborations might range from technology partnerships to outright acquisitions. The bottom line is that no company can be an island, and success in any market requires that organizations learn to co-create value with other firms.

All too often, though, business collaborations flounder badly, especially those between large organizations and small startups. Of course, every “David-Goliath” collaboration is unique, but often a major cause of these failures is a mismatch in organizational culture. One company might operate under a hierarchical command-and- control structure, for instance, while its partner prefers a more egalitarian environment. Or a fiscally conservative mindset might clash with an aggressive appetite for risk taking. What’s worse, cultural conflicts within an organization can further doom any external collaborations.

2 DAVID-GOLIATH CULTURE GAPS

AU$2 TRILLIONThe potential economic opportunity from increased collaboration between large and small companies

Page 3: CELINE LAURENCEAU, MICHAEL HEALD AND JULIEN FANON · 11. Salim Ismail, “Exponential Organizations: Why New Organizations Are Ten Times Better, Faster, and Cheaper than Yours (and

Large Australian organizations and startups each have their distinct cultures. Large organizations and startups differ culturally in a number of important ways. For one thing, Australian startups tend to place more value on involving employees in business strategy and are better able to retain the best employees. In a recent survey across seven countries, for Australia, Accenture Strategy found that more than three-quarters of Australian startup employees “agreed” or “strongly agreed” employees were involved in the business strategy, versus just 62 percent of those at large organizations. Australian startups were also better able to retain the best employees (80 versus 62 percent). However, they were less customer centric than large organizations (72 versus 84 percent).3

Yet, at the same time, the cultural commonalities between large organizations and startups can be far deeper than many might assume, with similarities touching upon the core values of the organization. Specifically, Australian startups and large organization share a focus on entrepreneurship (62 versus 66 percent), innovation at all organizational levels (74 versus 70 percent), and collaboration in an ecosystem (72 versus 74 percent).4 These fundamental similarities can help form an “axis of collaboration,” which can then be used to help bridge identified culture gaps.

WHEN GOLIATH MEETS DAVID

3 DAVID-GOLIATH CULTURE GAPS

AXIS OF COLLABORATIONLarge Australian organizations and start-ups share a focus on:

Entrepreneurship

Innovation at all levels

Collaboration in an ecosystem

LARGEORGANIZATIONS

66%62% 70%74% 74%72%

STARTUPS LARGEORGANIZATIONS

STARTUPS LARGEORGANIZATIONS

STARTUPS

LARGEORGANIZATIONS

66%62% 70%74% 74%72%

STARTUPS LARGEORGANIZATIONS

STARTUPS LARGEORGANIZATIONS

STARTUPS

LARGEORGANIZATIONS

66%62% 70%74% 74%72%

STARTUPS LARGEORGANIZATIONS

STARTUPS LARGEORGANIZATIONS

STARTUPS

Page 4: CELINE LAURENCEAU, MICHAEL HEALD AND JULIEN FANON · 11. Salim Ismail, “Exponential Organizations: Why New Organizations Are Ten Times Better, Faster, and Cheaper than Yours (and

David-Goliath culture gaps are not the only concern. Hidden, internal cultural gaps between hierarchical layers in large Australian organizations are often far greater. Unfortunately, leaders at large organizations are often unaware of that dangerous chasm. In recent Accenture Strategy research, for Australia, we found that 86 percent of leaders believe their organization is flexible and unrestricted by internal bureaucracies, versus just 52 percent of staffers. Moreover, although 72 percent of Australian leaders believe they involve their staff in business strategy, only 34 percent of staffers actually feel this way. And 90 percent of Australian leaders believe their organization values entrepreneurship, whereas only 29 percent of staffers agree.5 Why should leaders care? Additional global Accenture research found that, of those entrepreneurs who had previously worked in a large company, 75 percent left because they felt stifled within the corporate setting.6

Interestingly, Australian startups tend to perform well along the cultural dimensions of involving employees in the business strategy (78 percent), fast decision making (74 percent), and organizational flexibility (64 percent).7 And when it comes to cultural values, staffers at large companies can be aligned more with startup employees than with the senior management at their own organization. For instance, staffers at both types of organizations tend to share a disdain for internal bureaucracies.

THE MOST DANGEROUS GAPS MIGHT BE HIDDEN

4 DAVID-GOLIATH CULTURE GAPS

AMONG LARGE AUSTRALIAN ORGANIZATIONS: My organization is flexible and unrestricted by internal bureaucracies

Staff is involved in defining the strategy

My organization values entrepreneurship

LEADERS

86%52%

72%

34%

90%

29%

STAFFERS LEADERSSTAFFERS LEADERSSTAFFERS

LEADERS

86%52%

72%

34%

90%

29%

STAFFERS LEADERSSTAFFERS LEADERSSTAFFERS

LEADERS

86%52%

72%

34%

90%

29%

STAFFERS LEADERSSTAFFERS LEADERSSTAFFERS

Page 5: CELINE LAURENCEAU, MICHAEL HEALD AND JULIEN FANON · 11. Salim Ismail, “Exponential Organizations: Why New Organizations Are Ten Times Better, Faster, and Cheaper than Yours (and

Large organizations typically seek collaborations to gain access to innovative technologies and new markets, but the ancillary cultural benefits can be far more valuable. David-Goliath collaborations can, for example, help make the employees of a large organization more entrepreneurial and engaged. More room for entrepreneurship can be invaluable in attracting highly desired workers who might not have considered joining a large organization. After all, as Accenture Strategy research found, only one in five university graduates in the US, UK and Germany (21 percent) prefer to work for a large company.8

5 DAVID-GOLIATH CULTURE GAPS

COLLABORATION A SUCCESS? IT'S JUST THE BEGINNING

DAVID-GOLIATH COLLABORATIONS

can help make employees of a large organization more entrepreneurial and engaged

Page 6: CELINE LAURENCEAU, MICHAEL HEALD AND JULIEN FANON · 11. Salim Ismail, “Exponential Organizations: Why New Organizations Are Ten Times Better, Faster, and Cheaper than Yours (and

The following actions can set the right environment for a successful David-Goliath collaboration:

DEFINE YOUR COMMON GROUNDLeaders must first identify David-Goliath cultural similarities that could become the foundation for a successful collaboration. Do the two organizations, for example, share the common value of customer centricity? Also, leaders should identify the inevitable cultural differences so that workarounds can be developed to mitigate them. In some cases, however, the similarities might be too few and the differences insurmountable. For those situations, an organization might be better off looking for a different partner.

KNOW YOURSELFLeaders may initiate the collaboration, but it’s staffers who need to make it work. Map the cultural differences between your own ranks, and work on closing those gaps within your own organization. Closer alignment between the leaders and staffers within your organization will strengthen your chances of success when partnering with startups. Consider, for example, Mondelez International’s Mobile Futures initiative, which empowers its employees to launch their own startups incubated within the company and sends brand managers to work for a week with other startups identified from its accelerator program. An internal survey showed that 75 percent of Mondelez employees believe the company should think more like a startup, up from 35 percent the year before.9

BE PREPARED TO CHANGE YOUR DNAIdentify parts of the startup’s culture, including desired behaviors and employee mindsets, that you want to adopt to increase your organization’s competitiveness. To become more innovative, for instance, consider redefining roles, increasing transparency and autonomy, and rewarding creativity and risk taking. Often, these efforts must start at the top. When GE wanted to become more entrepreneurial, the company retained 500 coaches to train its executives to change their behaviors so that they would, for example, embrace more risk taking.10

WHAT TO DO?

6 DAVID-GOLIATH CULTURE GAPS

Page 7: CELINE LAURENCEAU, MICHAEL HEALD AND JULIEN FANON · 11. Salim Ismail, “Exponential Organizations: Why New Organizations Are Ten Times Better, Faster, and Cheaper than Yours (and

7 DAVID-GOLIATH CULTURE GAPS

Making a David-Goliath collaboration succeed over the long term requires skillful management and continual monitoring. Leaders must monitor the progress of the David-Goliath collaboration to ensure that any potential synergy between the two cultures is being realized. Often, the larger organization eventually subsumes the startup without obtaining any potential benefits from the latter’s culture. This is typically because the immune system of the larger organization kicks in, and “antibodies” resist and thwart any changes to the status quo.11 To avoid that, the partnership or acquisition might best proceed gradually to allow time for leaders to implement measures that will prevent any antibodies from becoming major obstacles.

Collaborations with nimble startups can help large organizations to be more agile and drive profitable growth over the long term. But managing such David-Goliath collaborations is easier said than done. In particular, organizational culture should not be overlooked. In fact, managing any cultural gaps properly is perhaps the most important task for leaders. As John Paitaridis, Managing Director of Optus Business commented, “They [established organisations and start-ups] need to work together. Few can master innovation on their own. And there are strengths and weaknesses on both fronts. When you bring them together it can be quite complimentary and can generate a much stronger innovation culture.”12

They [established organisations and startups] need to work together. Few can master innovation on their own. And there are strengths and weaknesses on both fronts. When you bring them together it can be quite complimentary and can generate a much stronger innovation culture.

John Paitaridis Managing Director, Optus Business

Page 8: CELINE LAURENCEAU, MICHAEL HEALD AND JULIEN FANON · 11. Salim Ismail, “Exponential Organizations: Why New Organizations Are Ten Times Better, Faster, and Cheaper than Yours (and

Copyright © 2017 Accenture. All rights reserved. Accenture, its logo, and High Performance Delivered are trademarks of Accenture.

This document makes descriptive reference to trademarks that may be owned by others. The use of such trademarks herein is not an assertion of ownership of such trademarks by Accenture and is not intended to represent or imply the existence of an association between Accenture and the lawful owners of such trademarks.

NOTES1. Accenture, "Harnessing the Power of Entrepreneurs to Open Innovation", 2015

2. CBA opens innovation lab in Hong Kong, Sydney Morning Herald, 19 January 2016

3. Accenture Strategy: Startups vs. Large Organizations Culture Study, 2016

4. Ibid

5. Ibid

6. Accenture, "Harnessing the Power of Entrepreneurs to Open Innovation", 2015.

7. Accenture Strategy: Startups vs. Large Organizations Culture Study, 2016

8. Accenture Strategy University Graduates Study in the US, UK and Germany, 2016

9. Accenture, "Harnessing the Power of Entrepreneurs to Open Innovation", 2015

10. Jennifer Alsever, “Startups… Inside Giant Companies,” Fortune, April 26, 2015

11. Salim Ismail, “Exponential Organizations: Why New Organizations Are Ten Times Better, Faster, and Cheaper than Yours (and What to Do About It),” Diversion Books, 2014

12. Big business and start-ups must collaborate more: Optus Business Chief, CIO, 18 October, 2015

METHODOLOGYAccenture Strategy conducted a study involving an online survey of 700 respondents, equally split between large organizations and startups, in Australia, Brazil, France, Germany, Italy, U.K. and U.S. The study explored the differences in culture between large organizations and startups, and was conducted in September of 2016.

ABOUT ACCENTUREAccenture is a leading global professional services company, providing a broad range of services and solutions in strategy, consulting, digital, technology and operations. Combining unmatched experience and specialized skills across more than 40 industries and all business functions – underpinned by the world’s largest delivery network – Accenture works at the intersection of business and technology to help clients improve their performance and create sustainable value for their stakeholders. With approximately 401,000 people serving clients in more than 120 countries, Accenture drives innovation to improve the way the world works and lives. Visit us at www.accenture.com.

ABOUT ACCENTURE STRATEGYAccenture Strategy operates at the intersection of business and technology. We bring together our capabilities in business, technology, operations and function strategy to help our clients envision and execute industry-specific strategies that support enterprise wide transformation. Our focus on issues related to digital disruption, competitiveness, global operating models, talent and leadership help drive both efficiencies and growth. For more information, follow @AccentureStrat or visit www.accenture.com/strategy.

CELINE LAURENCEAU

Paris, France [email protected]

MICHAEL HEALD

San Francisco, California [email protected]

JULIEN FANON

Paris, France [email protected]

CONTACT THE AUTHORS

JOIN THECONVERSATION

@AccentureStrat

linkedin.com/company/accenture-strategy

LUCA MARTINI

Sydney, Australia [email protected]

JÉRÉMY BATILLIOT

Paris, France [email protected]

CONTACT YOUR LOCAL EXPERT

CONTRIBUTOR