cea dsm dapnia egle tomasi-gustafsson gomel, july 31, 2007 1 polarization observables and hadron...

112
Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 CEA DSM Dapnia 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Upload: abigail-bryan

Post on 14-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 1

Polarization Observables and

Hadron Structure (1)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 2

MOTIVATIONS

bullIn the traditional view the atomrsquos

nucleus appears as a cluster of nucleons -

protons and neutrons A deeper view

reveals quarks and gluons inside the

nucleons

bullCEBAFrsquos continuous energetic beams of probing electrons let

physicists examine how the two view fit together Ultimately the

process of bridging the views will yield a complete understanding

of nuclear matterhellip

Istitutional plan 2002hellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 3

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Model Independent StatementsModel Independent Statements

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 4

PLANbullIntroduction-MotivationsbullHow to measure form factors

bull Unpolarized method (Rosenbluth separation)

bull Recoil polarization

bull Experiment (Polarimetry)

bullResults

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 5

Proton Form FactorsOver a period of time lasting at least 2000 years Man has puzzled over and sought an understanding of the composition of matterhellip

F2F2

F1F1

QQ22=1 GeV=1 GeV22

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 6

Hadron Electromagnetic Form factors

ndash Characterize the internal structure of a particle ( point-like)

ndash Elastic form factors contain information on the hadron

ground state

ndash In a P- and T-invariant theory the EM structure of a particle

of spin S is defined by 2S+1 form factors

ndash Neutron and proton form factors are different

ndash Deuteron 2 structure functions but 3 form factors

ndash Playground for theory and experiment

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 7

Space-like and time-like regions

bullFFs are analytical functionsbullIn framework of one photon exchange FFs are functions of

the momentum transfer squared of the virtual photon t

ScatterinScatteringg

e- + h =gt e- + h e+ + e- =gt h + h

_

AnnihilationAnnihilation

_

Form factors are real in the space-like region and complex in the time-like region

tlt0 tgt0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 8

How to measure

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 9

Electromagnetic interaction

One photon-exchange

bullThe electromagnetic vertex is known (what about radiative corrections )bullThe strong vertex contains the hadron structurebullValidity of one-photon exchange at large t

Observables differential cross section polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 10

Proton Form Factors before

Rosenbluth separation Polarization observablesRosenbluth separation Polarization observables

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 11

Dipole Approximation

bullClassical approachndash Nucleon FF (in the Breit

system) are Fourier transform of the charge or magnetic distribution

bullThe dipole approximation corresponds to an exponential density distribution

ndash ρ = ρ0 exp(-rr0)

ndash r02= (024 fm)2 ltr2gt ~(081 fm) 2

m2D =071 GeV2

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 12

Dipole Approximation and pQCD

Politzer (1974) Chernyak amp Zhitnisky (1984) Efremov amp Radyuskin (1980) Matveev (1985) Brodsky amp Lepage (1989)

Dimensional scaling

ndash Fn (Q2)= Cn [1( 1+Q2mn) n-1]bull mn=n2 ltquark momentum squaredgtbull n is the number of constituent quarks

ndash Setting 2 =(0471plusmn010) GeV2 (fitting pion data)

bull pion F (Q2)= C [1 (1+Q20471 GeV2)1]

bull nucleon FN (Q2)= CN [1( 1+Q2071 GeV2)2]

bull deuteron Fd (Q2)= Cd [1( 1+Q2141GeV2)5]

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 13

PolarizedUnpolarized methods

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 14

Rosenbluth separation Rosenbluth separation (1950)(1950)

bullElastic ep cross section (1-γ exchange)

bull point-like particle Mott

Linearity of the reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 15

Rosenbluth separationRosenbluth separation

=05=02

=08

Contribution of the electric term

hellipto be compared to the absolute value of the error on and to the size and dependence of RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 16

The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)

L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D 50 5491 (1994)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 17

The polarization induces a term in the cross section proportional to GE GM

Polarized beam and target or

polarized beam and recoil proton polarization

The polarization method (1967)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 18

The simultaneous measurement of Pt and Pl reduces the systematic errors

The polarization method (exp)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 19

HADRONPOLARIMETRY

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 20

Hadron PolarimetryHadron Polarimetry

bullPolarized beams

bullPolarized targets

bullPolarimeters

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 2: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 2

MOTIVATIONS

bullIn the traditional view the atomrsquos

nucleus appears as a cluster of nucleons -

protons and neutrons A deeper view

reveals quarks and gluons inside the

nucleons

bullCEBAFrsquos continuous energetic beams of probing electrons let

physicists examine how the two view fit together Ultimately the

process of bridging the views will yield a complete understanding

of nuclear matterhellip

Istitutional plan 2002hellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 3

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Model Independent StatementsModel Independent Statements

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 4

PLANbullIntroduction-MotivationsbullHow to measure form factors

bull Unpolarized method (Rosenbluth separation)

bull Recoil polarization

bull Experiment (Polarimetry)

bullResults

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 5

Proton Form FactorsOver a period of time lasting at least 2000 years Man has puzzled over and sought an understanding of the composition of matterhellip

F2F2

F1F1

QQ22=1 GeV=1 GeV22

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 6

Hadron Electromagnetic Form factors

ndash Characterize the internal structure of a particle ( point-like)

ndash Elastic form factors contain information on the hadron

ground state

ndash In a P- and T-invariant theory the EM structure of a particle

of spin S is defined by 2S+1 form factors

ndash Neutron and proton form factors are different

ndash Deuteron 2 structure functions but 3 form factors

ndash Playground for theory and experiment

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 7

Space-like and time-like regions

bullFFs are analytical functionsbullIn framework of one photon exchange FFs are functions of

the momentum transfer squared of the virtual photon t

ScatterinScatteringg

e- + h =gt e- + h e+ + e- =gt h + h

_

AnnihilationAnnihilation

_

Form factors are real in the space-like region and complex in the time-like region

tlt0 tgt0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 8

How to measure

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 9

Electromagnetic interaction

One photon-exchange

bullThe electromagnetic vertex is known (what about radiative corrections )bullThe strong vertex contains the hadron structurebullValidity of one-photon exchange at large t

Observables differential cross section polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 10

Proton Form Factors before

Rosenbluth separation Polarization observablesRosenbluth separation Polarization observables

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 11

Dipole Approximation

bullClassical approachndash Nucleon FF (in the Breit

system) are Fourier transform of the charge or magnetic distribution

bullThe dipole approximation corresponds to an exponential density distribution

ndash ρ = ρ0 exp(-rr0)

ndash r02= (024 fm)2 ltr2gt ~(081 fm) 2

m2D =071 GeV2

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 12

Dipole Approximation and pQCD

Politzer (1974) Chernyak amp Zhitnisky (1984) Efremov amp Radyuskin (1980) Matveev (1985) Brodsky amp Lepage (1989)

Dimensional scaling

ndash Fn (Q2)= Cn [1( 1+Q2mn) n-1]bull mn=n2 ltquark momentum squaredgtbull n is the number of constituent quarks

ndash Setting 2 =(0471plusmn010) GeV2 (fitting pion data)

bull pion F (Q2)= C [1 (1+Q20471 GeV2)1]

bull nucleon FN (Q2)= CN [1( 1+Q2071 GeV2)2]

bull deuteron Fd (Q2)= Cd [1( 1+Q2141GeV2)5]

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 13

PolarizedUnpolarized methods

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 14

Rosenbluth separation Rosenbluth separation (1950)(1950)

bullElastic ep cross section (1-γ exchange)

bull point-like particle Mott

Linearity of the reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 15

Rosenbluth separationRosenbluth separation

=05=02

=08

Contribution of the electric term

hellipto be compared to the absolute value of the error on and to the size and dependence of RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 16

The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)

L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D 50 5491 (1994)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 17

The polarization induces a term in the cross section proportional to GE GM

Polarized beam and target or

polarized beam and recoil proton polarization

The polarization method (1967)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 18

The simultaneous measurement of Pt and Pl reduces the systematic errors

The polarization method (exp)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 19

HADRONPOLARIMETRY

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 20

Hadron PolarimetryHadron Polarimetry

bullPolarized beams

bullPolarized targets

bullPolarimeters

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 3: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 3

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Model Independent StatementsModel Independent Statements

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 4

PLANbullIntroduction-MotivationsbullHow to measure form factors

bull Unpolarized method (Rosenbluth separation)

bull Recoil polarization

bull Experiment (Polarimetry)

bullResults

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 5

Proton Form FactorsOver a period of time lasting at least 2000 years Man has puzzled over and sought an understanding of the composition of matterhellip

F2F2

F1F1

QQ22=1 GeV=1 GeV22

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 6

Hadron Electromagnetic Form factors

ndash Characterize the internal structure of a particle ( point-like)

ndash Elastic form factors contain information on the hadron

ground state

ndash In a P- and T-invariant theory the EM structure of a particle

of spin S is defined by 2S+1 form factors

ndash Neutron and proton form factors are different

ndash Deuteron 2 structure functions but 3 form factors

ndash Playground for theory and experiment

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 7

Space-like and time-like regions

bullFFs are analytical functionsbullIn framework of one photon exchange FFs are functions of

the momentum transfer squared of the virtual photon t

ScatterinScatteringg

e- + h =gt e- + h e+ + e- =gt h + h

_

AnnihilationAnnihilation

_

Form factors are real in the space-like region and complex in the time-like region

tlt0 tgt0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 8

How to measure

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 9

Electromagnetic interaction

One photon-exchange

bullThe electromagnetic vertex is known (what about radiative corrections )bullThe strong vertex contains the hadron structurebullValidity of one-photon exchange at large t

Observables differential cross section polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 10

Proton Form Factors before

Rosenbluth separation Polarization observablesRosenbluth separation Polarization observables

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 11

Dipole Approximation

bullClassical approachndash Nucleon FF (in the Breit

system) are Fourier transform of the charge or magnetic distribution

bullThe dipole approximation corresponds to an exponential density distribution

ndash ρ = ρ0 exp(-rr0)

ndash r02= (024 fm)2 ltr2gt ~(081 fm) 2

m2D =071 GeV2

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 12

Dipole Approximation and pQCD

Politzer (1974) Chernyak amp Zhitnisky (1984) Efremov amp Radyuskin (1980) Matveev (1985) Brodsky amp Lepage (1989)

Dimensional scaling

ndash Fn (Q2)= Cn [1( 1+Q2mn) n-1]bull mn=n2 ltquark momentum squaredgtbull n is the number of constituent quarks

ndash Setting 2 =(0471plusmn010) GeV2 (fitting pion data)

bull pion F (Q2)= C [1 (1+Q20471 GeV2)1]

bull nucleon FN (Q2)= CN [1( 1+Q2071 GeV2)2]

bull deuteron Fd (Q2)= Cd [1( 1+Q2141GeV2)5]

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 13

PolarizedUnpolarized methods

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 14

Rosenbluth separation Rosenbluth separation (1950)(1950)

bullElastic ep cross section (1-γ exchange)

bull point-like particle Mott

Linearity of the reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 15

Rosenbluth separationRosenbluth separation

=05=02

=08

Contribution of the electric term

hellipto be compared to the absolute value of the error on and to the size and dependence of RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 16

The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)

L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D 50 5491 (1994)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 17

The polarization induces a term in the cross section proportional to GE GM

Polarized beam and target or

polarized beam and recoil proton polarization

The polarization method (1967)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 18

The simultaneous measurement of Pt and Pl reduces the systematic errors

The polarization method (exp)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 19

HADRONPOLARIMETRY

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 20

Hadron PolarimetryHadron Polarimetry

bullPolarized beams

bullPolarized targets

bullPolarimeters

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 4: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 4

PLANbullIntroduction-MotivationsbullHow to measure form factors

bull Unpolarized method (Rosenbluth separation)

bull Recoil polarization

bull Experiment (Polarimetry)

bullResults

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 5

Proton Form FactorsOver a period of time lasting at least 2000 years Man has puzzled over and sought an understanding of the composition of matterhellip

F2F2

F1F1

QQ22=1 GeV=1 GeV22

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 6

Hadron Electromagnetic Form factors

ndash Characterize the internal structure of a particle ( point-like)

ndash Elastic form factors contain information on the hadron

ground state

ndash In a P- and T-invariant theory the EM structure of a particle

of spin S is defined by 2S+1 form factors

ndash Neutron and proton form factors are different

ndash Deuteron 2 structure functions but 3 form factors

ndash Playground for theory and experiment

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 7

Space-like and time-like regions

bullFFs are analytical functionsbullIn framework of one photon exchange FFs are functions of

the momentum transfer squared of the virtual photon t

ScatterinScatteringg

e- + h =gt e- + h e+ + e- =gt h + h

_

AnnihilationAnnihilation

_

Form factors are real in the space-like region and complex in the time-like region

tlt0 tgt0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 8

How to measure

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 9

Electromagnetic interaction

One photon-exchange

bullThe electromagnetic vertex is known (what about radiative corrections )bullThe strong vertex contains the hadron structurebullValidity of one-photon exchange at large t

Observables differential cross section polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 10

Proton Form Factors before

Rosenbluth separation Polarization observablesRosenbluth separation Polarization observables

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 11

Dipole Approximation

bullClassical approachndash Nucleon FF (in the Breit

system) are Fourier transform of the charge or magnetic distribution

bullThe dipole approximation corresponds to an exponential density distribution

ndash ρ = ρ0 exp(-rr0)

ndash r02= (024 fm)2 ltr2gt ~(081 fm) 2

m2D =071 GeV2

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 12

Dipole Approximation and pQCD

Politzer (1974) Chernyak amp Zhitnisky (1984) Efremov amp Radyuskin (1980) Matveev (1985) Brodsky amp Lepage (1989)

Dimensional scaling

ndash Fn (Q2)= Cn [1( 1+Q2mn) n-1]bull mn=n2 ltquark momentum squaredgtbull n is the number of constituent quarks

ndash Setting 2 =(0471plusmn010) GeV2 (fitting pion data)

bull pion F (Q2)= C [1 (1+Q20471 GeV2)1]

bull nucleon FN (Q2)= CN [1( 1+Q2071 GeV2)2]

bull deuteron Fd (Q2)= Cd [1( 1+Q2141GeV2)5]

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 13

PolarizedUnpolarized methods

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 14

Rosenbluth separation Rosenbluth separation (1950)(1950)

bullElastic ep cross section (1-γ exchange)

bull point-like particle Mott

Linearity of the reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 15

Rosenbluth separationRosenbluth separation

=05=02

=08

Contribution of the electric term

hellipto be compared to the absolute value of the error on and to the size and dependence of RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 16

The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)

L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D 50 5491 (1994)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 17

The polarization induces a term in the cross section proportional to GE GM

Polarized beam and target or

polarized beam and recoil proton polarization

The polarization method (1967)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 18

The simultaneous measurement of Pt and Pl reduces the systematic errors

The polarization method (exp)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 19

HADRONPOLARIMETRY

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 20

Hadron PolarimetryHadron Polarimetry

bullPolarized beams

bullPolarized targets

bullPolarimeters

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 5: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 5

Proton Form FactorsOver a period of time lasting at least 2000 years Man has puzzled over and sought an understanding of the composition of matterhellip

F2F2

F1F1

QQ22=1 GeV=1 GeV22

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 6

Hadron Electromagnetic Form factors

ndash Characterize the internal structure of a particle ( point-like)

ndash Elastic form factors contain information on the hadron

ground state

ndash In a P- and T-invariant theory the EM structure of a particle

of spin S is defined by 2S+1 form factors

ndash Neutron and proton form factors are different

ndash Deuteron 2 structure functions but 3 form factors

ndash Playground for theory and experiment

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 7

Space-like and time-like regions

bullFFs are analytical functionsbullIn framework of one photon exchange FFs are functions of

the momentum transfer squared of the virtual photon t

ScatterinScatteringg

e- + h =gt e- + h e+ + e- =gt h + h

_

AnnihilationAnnihilation

_

Form factors are real in the space-like region and complex in the time-like region

tlt0 tgt0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 8

How to measure

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 9

Electromagnetic interaction

One photon-exchange

bullThe electromagnetic vertex is known (what about radiative corrections )bullThe strong vertex contains the hadron structurebullValidity of one-photon exchange at large t

Observables differential cross section polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 10

Proton Form Factors before

Rosenbluth separation Polarization observablesRosenbluth separation Polarization observables

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 11

Dipole Approximation

bullClassical approachndash Nucleon FF (in the Breit

system) are Fourier transform of the charge or magnetic distribution

bullThe dipole approximation corresponds to an exponential density distribution

ndash ρ = ρ0 exp(-rr0)

ndash r02= (024 fm)2 ltr2gt ~(081 fm) 2

m2D =071 GeV2

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 12

Dipole Approximation and pQCD

Politzer (1974) Chernyak amp Zhitnisky (1984) Efremov amp Radyuskin (1980) Matveev (1985) Brodsky amp Lepage (1989)

Dimensional scaling

ndash Fn (Q2)= Cn [1( 1+Q2mn) n-1]bull mn=n2 ltquark momentum squaredgtbull n is the number of constituent quarks

ndash Setting 2 =(0471plusmn010) GeV2 (fitting pion data)

bull pion F (Q2)= C [1 (1+Q20471 GeV2)1]

bull nucleon FN (Q2)= CN [1( 1+Q2071 GeV2)2]

bull deuteron Fd (Q2)= Cd [1( 1+Q2141GeV2)5]

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 13

PolarizedUnpolarized methods

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 14

Rosenbluth separation Rosenbluth separation (1950)(1950)

bullElastic ep cross section (1-γ exchange)

bull point-like particle Mott

Linearity of the reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 15

Rosenbluth separationRosenbluth separation

=05=02

=08

Contribution of the electric term

hellipto be compared to the absolute value of the error on and to the size and dependence of RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 16

The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)

L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D 50 5491 (1994)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 17

The polarization induces a term in the cross section proportional to GE GM

Polarized beam and target or

polarized beam and recoil proton polarization

The polarization method (1967)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 18

The simultaneous measurement of Pt and Pl reduces the systematic errors

The polarization method (exp)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 19

HADRONPOLARIMETRY

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 20

Hadron PolarimetryHadron Polarimetry

bullPolarized beams

bullPolarized targets

bullPolarimeters

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 6: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 6

Hadron Electromagnetic Form factors

ndash Characterize the internal structure of a particle ( point-like)

ndash Elastic form factors contain information on the hadron

ground state

ndash In a P- and T-invariant theory the EM structure of a particle

of spin S is defined by 2S+1 form factors

ndash Neutron and proton form factors are different

ndash Deuteron 2 structure functions but 3 form factors

ndash Playground for theory and experiment

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 7

Space-like and time-like regions

bullFFs are analytical functionsbullIn framework of one photon exchange FFs are functions of

the momentum transfer squared of the virtual photon t

ScatterinScatteringg

e- + h =gt e- + h e+ + e- =gt h + h

_

AnnihilationAnnihilation

_

Form factors are real in the space-like region and complex in the time-like region

tlt0 tgt0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 8

How to measure

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 9

Electromagnetic interaction

One photon-exchange

bullThe electromagnetic vertex is known (what about radiative corrections )bullThe strong vertex contains the hadron structurebullValidity of one-photon exchange at large t

Observables differential cross section polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 10

Proton Form Factors before

Rosenbluth separation Polarization observablesRosenbluth separation Polarization observables

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 11

Dipole Approximation

bullClassical approachndash Nucleon FF (in the Breit

system) are Fourier transform of the charge or magnetic distribution

bullThe dipole approximation corresponds to an exponential density distribution

ndash ρ = ρ0 exp(-rr0)

ndash r02= (024 fm)2 ltr2gt ~(081 fm) 2

m2D =071 GeV2

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 12

Dipole Approximation and pQCD

Politzer (1974) Chernyak amp Zhitnisky (1984) Efremov amp Radyuskin (1980) Matveev (1985) Brodsky amp Lepage (1989)

Dimensional scaling

ndash Fn (Q2)= Cn [1( 1+Q2mn) n-1]bull mn=n2 ltquark momentum squaredgtbull n is the number of constituent quarks

ndash Setting 2 =(0471plusmn010) GeV2 (fitting pion data)

bull pion F (Q2)= C [1 (1+Q20471 GeV2)1]

bull nucleon FN (Q2)= CN [1( 1+Q2071 GeV2)2]

bull deuteron Fd (Q2)= Cd [1( 1+Q2141GeV2)5]

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 13

PolarizedUnpolarized methods

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 14

Rosenbluth separation Rosenbluth separation (1950)(1950)

bullElastic ep cross section (1-γ exchange)

bull point-like particle Mott

Linearity of the reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 15

Rosenbluth separationRosenbluth separation

=05=02

=08

Contribution of the electric term

hellipto be compared to the absolute value of the error on and to the size and dependence of RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 16

The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)

L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D 50 5491 (1994)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 17

The polarization induces a term in the cross section proportional to GE GM

Polarized beam and target or

polarized beam and recoil proton polarization

The polarization method (1967)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 18

The simultaneous measurement of Pt and Pl reduces the systematic errors

The polarization method (exp)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 19

HADRONPOLARIMETRY

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 20

Hadron PolarimetryHadron Polarimetry

bullPolarized beams

bullPolarized targets

bullPolarimeters

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 7: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 7

Space-like and time-like regions

bullFFs are analytical functionsbullIn framework of one photon exchange FFs are functions of

the momentum transfer squared of the virtual photon t

ScatterinScatteringg

e- + h =gt e- + h e+ + e- =gt h + h

_

AnnihilationAnnihilation

_

Form factors are real in the space-like region and complex in the time-like region

tlt0 tgt0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 8

How to measure

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 9

Electromagnetic interaction

One photon-exchange

bullThe electromagnetic vertex is known (what about radiative corrections )bullThe strong vertex contains the hadron structurebullValidity of one-photon exchange at large t

Observables differential cross section polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 10

Proton Form Factors before

Rosenbluth separation Polarization observablesRosenbluth separation Polarization observables

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 11

Dipole Approximation

bullClassical approachndash Nucleon FF (in the Breit

system) are Fourier transform of the charge or magnetic distribution

bullThe dipole approximation corresponds to an exponential density distribution

ndash ρ = ρ0 exp(-rr0)

ndash r02= (024 fm)2 ltr2gt ~(081 fm) 2

m2D =071 GeV2

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 12

Dipole Approximation and pQCD

Politzer (1974) Chernyak amp Zhitnisky (1984) Efremov amp Radyuskin (1980) Matveev (1985) Brodsky amp Lepage (1989)

Dimensional scaling

ndash Fn (Q2)= Cn [1( 1+Q2mn) n-1]bull mn=n2 ltquark momentum squaredgtbull n is the number of constituent quarks

ndash Setting 2 =(0471plusmn010) GeV2 (fitting pion data)

bull pion F (Q2)= C [1 (1+Q20471 GeV2)1]

bull nucleon FN (Q2)= CN [1( 1+Q2071 GeV2)2]

bull deuteron Fd (Q2)= Cd [1( 1+Q2141GeV2)5]

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 13

PolarizedUnpolarized methods

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 14

Rosenbluth separation Rosenbluth separation (1950)(1950)

bullElastic ep cross section (1-γ exchange)

bull point-like particle Mott

Linearity of the reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 15

Rosenbluth separationRosenbluth separation

=05=02

=08

Contribution of the electric term

hellipto be compared to the absolute value of the error on and to the size and dependence of RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 16

The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)

L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D 50 5491 (1994)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 17

The polarization induces a term in the cross section proportional to GE GM

Polarized beam and target or

polarized beam and recoil proton polarization

The polarization method (1967)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 18

The simultaneous measurement of Pt and Pl reduces the systematic errors

The polarization method (exp)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 19

HADRONPOLARIMETRY

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 20

Hadron PolarimetryHadron Polarimetry

bullPolarized beams

bullPolarized targets

bullPolarimeters

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 8: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 8

How to measure

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 9

Electromagnetic interaction

One photon-exchange

bullThe electromagnetic vertex is known (what about radiative corrections )bullThe strong vertex contains the hadron structurebullValidity of one-photon exchange at large t

Observables differential cross section polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 10

Proton Form Factors before

Rosenbluth separation Polarization observablesRosenbluth separation Polarization observables

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 11

Dipole Approximation

bullClassical approachndash Nucleon FF (in the Breit

system) are Fourier transform of the charge or magnetic distribution

bullThe dipole approximation corresponds to an exponential density distribution

ndash ρ = ρ0 exp(-rr0)

ndash r02= (024 fm)2 ltr2gt ~(081 fm) 2

m2D =071 GeV2

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 12

Dipole Approximation and pQCD

Politzer (1974) Chernyak amp Zhitnisky (1984) Efremov amp Radyuskin (1980) Matveev (1985) Brodsky amp Lepage (1989)

Dimensional scaling

ndash Fn (Q2)= Cn [1( 1+Q2mn) n-1]bull mn=n2 ltquark momentum squaredgtbull n is the number of constituent quarks

ndash Setting 2 =(0471plusmn010) GeV2 (fitting pion data)

bull pion F (Q2)= C [1 (1+Q20471 GeV2)1]

bull nucleon FN (Q2)= CN [1( 1+Q2071 GeV2)2]

bull deuteron Fd (Q2)= Cd [1( 1+Q2141GeV2)5]

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 13

PolarizedUnpolarized methods

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 14

Rosenbluth separation Rosenbluth separation (1950)(1950)

bullElastic ep cross section (1-γ exchange)

bull point-like particle Mott

Linearity of the reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 15

Rosenbluth separationRosenbluth separation

=05=02

=08

Contribution of the electric term

hellipto be compared to the absolute value of the error on and to the size and dependence of RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 16

The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)

L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D 50 5491 (1994)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 17

The polarization induces a term in the cross section proportional to GE GM

Polarized beam and target or

polarized beam and recoil proton polarization

The polarization method (1967)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 18

The simultaneous measurement of Pt and Pl reduces the systematic errors

The polarization method (exp)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 19

HADRONPOLARIMETRY

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 20

Hadron PolarimetryHadron Polarimetry

bullPolarized beams

bullPolarized targets

bullPolarimeters

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 9: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 9

Electromagnetic interaction

One photon-exchange

bullThe electromagnetic vertex is known (what about radiative corrections )bullThe strong vertex contains the hadron structurebullValidity of one-photon exchange at large t

Observables differential cross section polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 10

Proton Form Factors before

Rosenbluth separation Polarization observablesRosenbluth separation Polarization observables

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 11

Dipole Approximation

bullClassical approachndash Nucleon FF (in the Breit

system) are Fourier transform of the charge or magnetic distribution

bullThe dipole approximation corresponds to an exponential density distribution

ndash ρ = ρ0 exp(-rr0)

ndash r02= (024 fm)2 ltr2gt ~(081 fm) 2

m2D =071 GeV2

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 12

Dipole Approximation and pQCD

Politzer (1974) Chernyak amp Zhitnisky (1984) Efremov amp Radyuskin (1980) Matveev (1985) Brodsky amp Lepage (1989)

Dimensional scaling

ndash Fn (Q2)= Cn [1( 1+Q2mn) n-1]bull mn=n2 ltquark momentum squaredgtbull n is the number of constituent quarks

ndash Setting 2 =(0471plusmn010) GeV2 (fitting pion data)

bull pion F (Q2)= C [1 (1+Q20471 GeV2)1]

bull nucleon FN (Q2)= CN [1( 1+Q2071 GeV2)2]

bull deuteron Fd (Q2)= Cd [1( 1+Q2141GeV2)5]

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 13

PolarizedUnpolarized methods

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 14

Rosenbluth separation Rosenbluth separation (1950)(1950)

bullElastic ep cross section (1-γ exchange)

bull point-like particle Mott

Linearity of the reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 15

Rosenbluth separationRosenbluth separation

=05=02

=08

Contribution of the electric term

hellipto be compared to the absolute value of the error on and to the size and dependence of RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 16

The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)

L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D 50 5491 (1994)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 17

The polarization induces a term in the cross section proportional to GE GM

Polarized beam and target or

polarized beam and recoil proton polarization

The polarization method (1967)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 18

The simultaneous measurement of Pt and Pl reduces the systematic errors

The polarization method (exp)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 19

HADRONPOLARIMETRY

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 20

Hadron PolarimetryHadron Polarimetry

bullPolarized beams

bullPolarized targets

bullPolarimeters

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 10: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 10

Proton Form Factors before

Rosenbluth separation Polarization observablesRosenbluth separation Polarization observables

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 11

Dipole Approximation

bullClassical approachndash Nucleon FF (in the Breit

system) are Fourier transform of the charge or magnetic distribution

bullThe dipole approximation corresponds to an exponential density distribution

ndash ρ = ρ0 exp(-rr0)

ndash r02= (024 fm)2 ltr2gt ~(081 fm) 2

m2D =071 GeV2

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 12

Dipole Approximation and pQCD

Politzer (1974) Chernyak amp Zhitnisky (1984) Efremov amp Radyuskin (1980) Matveev (1985) Brodsky amp Lepage (1989)

Dimensional scaling

ndash Fn (Q2)= Cn [1( 1+Q2mn) n-1]bull mn=n2 ltquark momentum squaredgtbull n is the number of constituent quarks

ndash Setting 2 =(0471plusmn010) GeV2 (fitting pion data)

bull pion F (Q2)= C [1 (1+Q20471 GeV2)1]

bull nucleon FN (Q2)= CN [1( 1+Q2071 GeV2)2]

bull deuteron Fd (Q2)= Cd [1( 1+Q2141GeV2)5]

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 13

PolarizedUnpolarized methods

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 14

Rosenbluth separation Rosenbluth separation (1950)(1950)

bullElastic ep cross section (1-γ exchange)

bull point-like particle Mott

Linearity of the reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 15

Rosenbluth separationRosenbluth separation

=05=02

=08

Contribution of the electric term

hellipto be compared to the absolute value of the error on and to the size and dependence of RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 16

The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)

L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D 50 5491 (1994)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 17

The polarization induces a term in the cross section proportional to GE GM

Polarized beam and target or

polarized beam and recoil proton polarization

The polarization method (1967)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 18

The simultaneous measurement of Pt and Pl reduces the systematic errors

The polarization method (exp)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 19

HADRONPOLARIMETRY

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 20

Hadron PolarimetryHadron Polarimetry

bullPolarized beams

bullPolarized targets

bullPolarimeters

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 11: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 11

Dipole Approximation

bullClassical approachndash Nucleon FF (in the Breit

system) are Fourier transform of the charge or magnetic distribution

bullThe dipole approximation corresponds to an exponential density distribution

ndash ρ = ρ0 exp(-rr0)

ndash r02= (024 fm)2 ltr2gt ~(081 fm) 2

m2D =071 GeV2

Dipole approximation GD=(1+Q2071 GeV2)-2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 12

Dipole Approximation and pQCD

Politzer (1974) Chernyak amp Zhitnisky (1984) Efremov amp Radyuskin (1980) Matveev (1985) Brodsky amp Lepage (1989)

Dimensional scaling

ndash Fn (Q2)= Cn [1( 1+Q2mn) n-1]bull mn=n2 ltquark momentum squaredgtbull n is the number of constituent quarks

ndash Setting 2 =(0471plusmn010) GeV2 (fitting pion data)

bull pion F (Q2)= C [1 (1+Q20471 GeV2)1]

bull nucleon FN (Q2)= CN [1( 1+Q2071 GeV2)2]

bull deuteron Fd (Q2)= Cd [1( 1+Q2141GeV2)5]

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 13

PolarizedUnpolarized methods

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 14

Rosenbluth separation Rosenbluth separation (1950)(1950)

bullElastic ep cross section (1-γ exchange)

bull point-like particle Mott

Linearity of the reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 15

Rosenbluth separationRosenbluth separation

=05=02

=08

Contribution of the electric term

hellipto be compared to the absolute value of the error on and to the size and dependence of RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 16

The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)

L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D 50 5491 (1994)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 17

The polarization induces a term in the cross section proportional to GE GM

Polarized beam and target or

polarized beam and recoil proton polarization

The polarization method (1967)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 18

The simultaneous measurement of Pt and Pl reduces the systematic errors

The polarization method (exp)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 19

HADRONPOLARIMETRY

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 20

Hadron PolarimetryHadron Polarimetry

bullPolarized beams

bullPolarized targets

bullPolarimeters

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 12: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 12

Dipole Approximation and pQCD

Politzer (1974) Chernyak amp Zhitnisky (1984) Efremov amp Radyuskin (1980) Matveev (1985) Brodsky amp Lepage (1989)

Dimensional scaling

ndash Fn (Q2)= Cn [1( 1+Q2mn) n-1]bull mn=n2 ltquark momentum squaredgtbull n is the number of constituent quarks

ndash Setting 2 =(0471plusmn010) GeV2 (fitting pion data)

bull pion F (Q2)= C [1 (1+Q20471 GeV2)1]

bull nucleon FN (Q2)= CN [1( 1+Q2071 GeV2)2]

bull deuteron Fd (Q2)= Cd [1( 1+Q2141GeV2)5]

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 13

PolarizedUnpolarized methods

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 14

Rosenbluth separation Rosenbluth separation (1950)(1950)

bullElastic ep cross section (1-γ exchange)

bull point-like particle Mott

Linearity of the reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 15

Rosenbluth separationRosenbluth separation

=05=02

=08

Contribution of the electric term

hellipto be compared to the absolute value of the error on and to the size and dependence of RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 16

The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)

L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D 50 5491 (1994)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 17

The polarization induces a term in the cross section proportional to GE GM

Polarized beam and target or

polarized beam and recoil proton polarization

The polarization method (1967)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 18

The simultaneous measurement of Pt and Pl reduces the systematic errors

The polarization method (exp)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 19

HADRONPOLARIMETRY

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 20

Hadron PolarimetryHadron Polarimetry

bullPolarized beams

bullPolarized targets

bullPolarimeters

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 13: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 13

PolarizedUnpolarized methods

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 14

Rosenbluth separation Rosenbluth separation (1950)(1950)

bullElastic ep cross section (1-γ exchange)

bull point-like particle Mott

Linearity of the reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 15

Rosenbluth separationRosenbluth separation

=05=02

=08

Contribution of the electric term

hellipto be compared to the absolute value of the error on and to the size and dependence of RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 16

The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)

L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D 50 5491 (1994)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 17

The polarization induces a term in the cross section proportional to GE GM

Polarized beam and target or

polarized beam and recoil proton polarization

The polarization method (1967)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 18

The simultaneous measurement of Pt and Pl reduces the systematic errors

The polarization method (exp)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 19

HADRONPOLARIMETRY

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 20

Hadron PolarimetryHadron Polarimetry

bullPolarized beams

bullPolarized targets

bullPolarimeters

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 14: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 14

Rosenbluth separation Rosenbluth separation (1950)(1950)

bullElastic ep cross section (1-γ exchange)

bull point-like particle Mott

Linearity of the reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 15

Rosenbluth separationRosenbluth separation

=05=02

=08

Contribution of the electric term

hellipto be compared to the absolute value of the error on and to the size and dependence of RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 16

The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)

L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D 50 5491 (1994)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 17

The polarization induces a term in the cross section proportional to GE GM

Polarized beam and target or

polarized beam and recoil proton polarization

The polarization method (1967)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 18

The simultaneous measurement of Pt and Pl reduces the systematic errors

The polarization method (exp)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 19

HADRONPOLARIMETRY

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 20

Hadron PolarimetryHadron Polarimetry

bullPolarized beams

bullPolarized targets

bullPolarimeters

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 15: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 15

Rosenbluth separationRosenbluth separation

=05=02

=08

Contribution of the electric term

hellipto be compared to the absolute value of the error on and to the size and dependence of RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 16

The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)

L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D 50 5491 (1994)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 17

The polarization induces a term in the cross section proportional to GE GM

Polarized beam and target or

polarized beam and recoil proton polarization

The polarization method (1967)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 18

The simultaneous measurement of Pt and Pl reduces the systematic errors

The polarization method (exp)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 19

HADRONPOLARIMETRY

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 20

Hadron PolarimetryHadron Polarimetry

bullPolarized beams

bullPolarized targets

bullPolarimeters

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 16: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 16

The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)The Rosenbluth data (SLAC)

L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D 50 5491 (1994)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 17

The polarization induces a term in the cross section proportional to GE GM

Polarized beam and target or

polarized beam and recoil proton polarization

The polarization method (1967)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 18

The simultaneous measurement of Pt and Pl reduces the systematic errors

The polarization method (exp)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 19

HADRONPOLARIMETRY

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 20

Hadron PolarimetryHadron Polarimetry

bullPolarized beams

bullPolarized targets

bullPolarimeters

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 17: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 17

The polarization induces a term in the cross section proportional to GE GM

Polarized beam and target or

polarized beam and recoil proton polarization

The polarization method (1967)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 18

The simultaneous measurement of Pt and Pl reduces the systematic errors

The polarization method (exp)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 19

HADRONPOLARIMETRY

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 20

Hadron PolarimetryHadron Polarimetry

bullPolarized beams

bullPolarized targets

bullPolarimeters

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 18: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 18

The simultaneous measurement of Pt and Pl reduces the systematic errors

The polarization method (exp)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 19

HADRONPOLARIMETRY

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 20

Hadron PolarimetryHadron Polarimetry

bullPolarized beams

bullPolarized targets

bullPolarimeters

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 19: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 19

HADRONPOLARIMETRY

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 20

Hadron PolarimetryHadron Polarimetry

bullPolarized beams

bullPolarized targets

bullPolarimeters

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 20: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 20

Hadron PolarimetryHadron Polarimetry

bullPolarized beams

bullPolarized targets

bullPolarimeters

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 21: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 21

Hadron Polarimetry

Working principle measurement of the azymuthal asymmetry in a secondary scattering

Large cross section (statistical errors) Large analyzing power (systematic errors)

Vector polarization inclusive scattering on light targets p+C rarr one charged particle +X

Tensor polarization exclusive scattering d+p rarr d+p (elastic scattering) d+p rarr p+p+n (charge exchange reaction)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 22: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 22

Charge exchange reactionCharge exchange reaction

Idea from I Pomeranchuk (1938)

d +p rarr (pp) + n The deuteron is a bound np system in T=0 S=1 state ( l=0 or 2)

Selecting a pair of protons in relative s-state requires a spin-flipdue to Pauli principle anti-symmetric total wave function

Large tensor analyzing power

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 23: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 23

Vector Polarimeter

Inclusive reaction p(d)+C 1 Charged particle+X

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 24: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 24

Proton polarimeterInclusive reaction p+C 1 Charged particle+X

bull Calibration analyzing powersCalibration analyzing powers

bull Measurement polarizationMeasurement polarization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 25: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 25

HADRON POLARIMETRY

bull The Efficiency

bull The Figure of merit

bull The Error on the Polarization Measurement

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 26: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 26

Polarimetry at 4-5 GeV

Pomme polarimeter

JINR -LHE synchrophasotron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 27: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 27

Figure of merit

HYPOM

Analyzing powers

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 28: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 28

The experimental set-up

bull Trigger on proton background target walls and pion electroproduction

bull The solid angle is defined by the proton

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 29: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 29

JLab - HALL A

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 30: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 30

The HALL A-calorimeter

bull Assembled a 135 x 255 m2

calorimeter

bull 17 rows and 9 columns of 15x15 lead-glass blocks

Electron detection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 31: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 31

Proton momentum and scattering angle

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 32: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 32

Identify coincidence events

Good separation peakbackground

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 33: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 33

Identify elastic events

In-plane and out-of-plane angular correlation

Angles measured in the calorimeter and in the spectrometer

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 34: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 34

Identify elastic events

After angular selection

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 35: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 35

Focal plane polarimeter

cosfpp

nP

yAsinfpp

tP

yA1

)ε(θ)( f

Ptfpp and Pn

fpp are the physical asymmetries at the FPP

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 36: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 36

Azymuthal distribution

Q2=56 GeVc2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 37: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 37

Discussion of the results

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 38: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 38

THE RESULTS

Jlab E93-027 E99-007SpokepersonsCh Perdrisat V Punjabi M Jones E Brash

M Jones et ql Phys Rev Lett 841398 (2000)O Gayou et al Phys Rev Lett 88092301 (2002)

Linear deviation from dipole

GEpGMp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 39: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 39

Nucleon models

bullSkyrme Models (Soliton)bullVector Dominance Models (G-K IJLhellip)bullPerturbative QCDbull(Relativistic) Constituent Quark ModelbullDi-quark modelsbullGPDbullhelliphellip

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 40: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 40

Comparison with theory

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 41: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 41

Issues

bullSimultaneous description of the four nucleon form factors

bullin the space-like and in the time-like regionsbullConsequences for the light ions descriptionbullWhen pQCD starts to applybullSource of the discrepancy

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 42: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 42

The nucleon form factors

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB 43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC 66 045501 2002)

HohlerNPB 114 505 (1976)

BostedPRC 51 409 (1995)

Electric Magneticne

utro

npr

oton

E T-G F Lacroix Ch Duterte GI Gakh EPJA (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 43: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 43

The neutron Form Factor

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 44: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 44

Electric NEUTRON Form Factor

ndash Smaller than for proton but not so smallndash New results also based on polarization

method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 45: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 45

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

-The KHARKOV model - Impulse Approximation - Deuteron structure - Kinematics proton spectator - Polarization observables

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 46: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 46

The reaction d(eersquon)p - Ax

Select the quasi-elastic Kinematics

Large dependence of the asymmetry on GEn

Polarized electron beam polarized target or neutron polarimeter

GI Gakh A P Rekalo E T-G Annals of Physics (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 47: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 47

Neutron electric form factor

Longitudinally polarized electrons polarized target a method similar to the polarization method which takes into account the deuteron structure

Phys Rev C 70 025202 (2004)

Real Amplitudes functionsof W Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 48: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 49

GEn from e-deuteron elastic scattering

bullGEn gt GEp starting from 2 GeV2

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 49: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 50

The IA deuteron structure

E T-G and M P Rekalo Europhys Lett 55 188 (2001)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 50: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 51

Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (2)

Egle Tomasi-GustafssonSaclay France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 51: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 52

GENERAL PLANbullLecture 1

ndash Introduction-Motivationsndash How to measure proton form factorsndash Recent Results ndash Space and time-like regions

bullLecture 2ndash Consequences

bull Space and time-like regionsbull Asymptoticsbull Two photon exchangebull Radiative corrections

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 52: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 53

Time-like region

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 53: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 54

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 54: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 55

The matrix element

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 55: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 56

The matrix element

Conservation of hadronic and leptonic current

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 56: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 57

GE=GM at threshold

Leptonic current

Hadronic current

At threshold L=0 1

L=0 L=2

GE=GM

(M P Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 57: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 58

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

As in SL region- Dependence on q2 contained in FFs- Even dependence on cos2exchange- No dependence on the sign of FFs- Enhancement of the magnetic term

but TL form factors are complex

A Zichichi S M Berman N Cabibbo R Gatto Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV 170 (1962)B Bilenkii C Giunti V Wataghin Z Phys C 59 475 (1993)G Gakh and ET-G Nucl Phys A761120 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 58: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 59

Time-like observables | GE| 2 and | GM| 2

-The Total Cross Section

Cross section at 900

-The angular asymmetry R

Due to limited statistics no experimental determination of individual FFs in TL region yet GE=GM or GE=0

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 59: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 60

Time-Like regionTime-Like region

GE=0

GE=GM

GE=GD

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

| GM| 2

Angular Asymmetry

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 60: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 61

Models in TL region

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh EPJA 2005

VDM IJLF IachelloPLB43 191 (1973)

Extended VDM (G-K 92) ELLomon PRC66 045501(2002)

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

proton

neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 61: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 62

Spin Observables

Analyzing power A

Double spin observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 62: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 63

Models in TL Region (polarization)

VDM IJL

Ext VDM

lsquoQCD inspiredrsquo

R

Ay Axx Ayy

Axz

Azz

E T-G F Lacroix C Duterte GI Gakh

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 63: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 64

Asymptotics

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 64: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 65

pQCD predictions

bull Scaling laws probability to keep the hadron intact the momentum transfer is equally shared among the constituents

test form factorsbull Helicity conservation

vector interaction between gluons and massless quarks test polarization bservables

bull Reduced nuclear amplitudesintroduce non perturbative correctionsby removing the

complex structure of the nucleontest reduced cross section

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 65: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 66

Scaling

pQCD F1 1Q4 F2 1Q6 F1 F2 Q2

Corrections logarithmiques

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 66: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 67

The deuteron (S=1)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 67: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 68

The deuteron Cross section

A(Q2)

B(Q2)A(Q2)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 68: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 69

The Deuteron Polarization Observables

Jlab E94-018 SpokepersonsB Beise S Kox

D Abbott et ql Phys Rev Lett 845053 (2000)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 69: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 70

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLab

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 70: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 71

Reduced deuteron form factors

LAlexa et al PRL 82 1374 (1999) HallA JLabS Platchkov et al NPA 510 740 (1990) ALS SaclayRG Arnold et al PRL 57 174 (1986) Slac

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 71: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 72

ed-elastic cross sectionA(Q2)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) (FN (Q2 4) GEp (Q2 4))

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) G2Ep (Q2 4)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F2N(Q2 4)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 72: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 73

From ed-elastic cross section

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2) F12(Q24)

fD (Q2)= FD (Q2)(F1(Q24)F2(Q24))

fD(Q2)= FD (Q2) F22(Q24)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 73: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 74

Fitting fD

Large instability for Λ

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 74: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 75

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

bullAsymptotic properties for analytical functions if f(z) a as z along a straight line and f(z) b as z along another straight line and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between then a=b and f(z) a uniformly in the angle

E T-G and G Gakh Eur Phys J A 26 265 (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 75: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 76

Phragmegraven-Lindeloumlf theorem

E T-G and M P Rekalo Phys Lett B 504 291 (2001)

Applies to NN and NNInteraction (Pomeranchuk theorem )t=0 not a QCD regime

Connection with QCD asymptoticsGM (TL)

GM (SL)

GE (SL)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 76: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 77

Two photon exchange

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 77: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 78

Two-photon exchange

Electric proton FF

Different results with different

experimental methods

New mechanism

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 78: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 79

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

bull1-2 interference is of the order of =e24=1137 (in usual

calculations of radiative corrections one photon is lsquohardrsquo and one is

lsquosoftrsquo)

bullIn the 70rsquos it was shown [J Gunion and L Stodolsky V Franco

FM Lev VN Boitsov L Kondratyuk and VB Kopeliovich R

Blankenbecker and J Gunion] that at large momentum transfer due

to the sharp decrease of the FFs if the momentum is shared between

the two photons the 2contribution can become very large

bullThe 2 amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary

bullIn this case the 1-2 interference is more important in time-like

region as the Born amplitude is complex

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 79: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 80

Qualitative estimation of 2Qualitative estimation of 2 exchange exchange

From quark counting rules Fd ~ t-5 and FN~t-2

For t = 4 GeV2

For d 3He 4He 2effect should appear at ~1 GeV2for protons ~ 10 GeV2

q2 q2

For ed elastic scattering

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 80: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 81

Two-Photon exchangeTwo-Photon exchange

In 1999 MP Rekalo E T-G and D Prout found

a model-independent parametrization of the 2

contribution and applied to ed-elastic scattering data

rarr Discrepancy between the results from

Hall A [LC Alexa et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1374 (1999)]

and

Hall C [D Abbott et al Phys Rev Lett 82 1379 (1999)]

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 81: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 82

1g

11-2-2 interference interference

21

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C (1999)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 82: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 83

Crossing Symmetry

Scattering and annihilation channels

- Described by the same amplitude

- function of two kinematical variables s and t

p2 rarr ndash p1

k2 rarr ndash k2

- which scan different kinematical regions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 83: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 84

11-2-2 interference interference

M P Rekalo E T-G and D Prout Phys Rev C60 042202 (1999)

CA DA

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 84: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 85

eeplusmn plusmn + p+ prarr rarr eeplusmnplusmn + p+ p

1 exchange

bull Two EM form factorsbull Real (in SL region)bull Functions of one variable (t)bull Describe e+ and e- scattering

2 exchange

bull Three structure functionsbull Complexebull Functions of TWO variables (st)bull Different for e+ and e- scattering

4 spin frac12 fermions rarrrarr 16 amplitudes in the general caseT-invariance of EM interaction identity of initial and final states helicity conservation unitarity

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 85: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 86

Model independent considerations

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

Where VEPP3 (Novosibirsk) ( cf S Serednyakov) HERA

Generalization of the polarization method (A Akhiezer and MP Rekalo)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 86: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 87

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )

bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 87: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 88

If no positron beamhellip

Either three T-odd polarization observableshellip

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

very difficult experimentsvery difficult experimentsonly model independent ways (without positron beams)only model independent ways (without positron beams)

M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A740 (2004) 271 M P Rekalo and E T-G Nucl Phys A742 (2004) 322

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 88: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 89

Model independent considerations for eeplusmnplusmn N scattering

Determination of EM form factors in presence of 2exchange

- electron and positron beams - longitudinally polarized - in identical kinematical conditions

If no positron beamhellipEither three T-odd polarization observableshellip

bullAy unpolarized leptons transversally polarized target (or Py outgoing nucleon polarization with unpolarized leptons unpolarized target )bullDepolarization tensor (Dab) dependence of the b-component of the final nucleon polarization on the a-component of the nucleon target with longitudinally polarized leptons

or five T-even polarization observableshellip among dd Px(e) Pz(e) Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz

M P Rekalo E T-G EPJA (2004) Nucl Phys A (2003)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 89: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 90

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 90: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 91

Parametrization of 2 for ep elastic scattering

With the correct symmetry properties

or

Q2-dependence

Simple parametrization

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 91: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 92

From the data

deviation from linearity

ltlt 1

Parametrization of 2-contribution for e+p

E T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 92: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 93

The proton magnetic form factorThe proton magnetic form factor

The difference is not at the level of the measured observables but on the slope (derivative)

E Brash et al Phys Rev C65 051001 (2002)

Polarization results induce

15-3 global effect

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 93: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 94

Radiative Corrections to the dataRadiative Corrections to the data

Slope negative if

- RC can reach 40 on - Declared error ~1- Same correction for GE and GM

- Have a large -dependence- Affect the slope

The slope is negative starting from 2-3 GeV2

el=meas RC

slope

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 94: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 95

Reduced cross section and RC

Data from L Andivahis et al Phys Rev D50 5491 (1994)

Q2=175 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2

Q2=325 GeV2

Q2=4 GeV2

Q2=25 GeV2

Q2=7 GeV2

Q2=6 GeV2

With RCWithout RC

Slope from P ME T-G G Gakh Phys Rev C (2005)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 95: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 96

Experimental correlationExperimental correlation

Two parameters linear fit

Correlation GEp2 ndash GMp

2

100

Depends on and on the size of RC ltCRgt

el=meas RC

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 96: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 97

Structure Function method

bullSF method applied to QED processes calculation of radiative corrections with precision of 01

bullTakes into account the dynamics of the process

bullFormulated in terms of parton densities (leptons antileptons photons)

bullMany applications to different processes

E A Kuraev and VS Fadin Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

Electron SF probability to lsquofindrsquo electron in the initial electron with energy fraction x and virtuality up to Q2

Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 97: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 98

Structure Function method (Applications)

- e+e- hadrons( J width) E A KURAEV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 41 466 (1985)

- ep ersquoX (elastic and inelastic scattering)E A KURAEV NP MERENKOV and VS FADIN Sov J of Nucl Phys 471009 (1988)

ndash Decay width of mesons (FSI)E A KURAEV JETP Lett65 127 (1997)

ndash ep ersquop() polarized and unpolarized cases (in progress)Y Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

ndash Compton and double Compton scatteringANIlyichev EA Kuraev VBytev and Y P Peresunko J Exp Theor Phys100 31 (2005)

ndash Radiative corrections for LEP beam (small angle BHABHA scattering)

ABArbuzov EAKuraev et al Phys LettB 399 312 (1997)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 98: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 99

Short history (I)

Schwinger corrections to cross section for electron scattering in external field

s=s0(1+d) (1)

Yennie Frauchi Suura cross section of any pure process (without real photon emission) is

zero

Kessler Ericsson Baier Fadin Khoze Y Tsai quasi real electron method Emission of hard photon is described in terms of a convolution of a radiative function with Born cross section (1) Not adequate

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 99: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 100

Short history (II)

1977 Altarelli Parisi Gribov Lipatov Dokshitzer (DGLAP)Asymptotic freedom evolution equation Collins Factorization theorem

Drell-Yan picture of hard processed in QED application ofQCD ideas to QED radiative corrections in form of structurefunctions and Drell-Yan picture

Leading terms and non leading termsexplicitely taken into account in DGLAP evolutionequations In QED known as Lipatov equations (1975)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 100: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 101

Scattered electron energy

All orders of PT needed beyond Mo amp Tsai approximation

Initial state emission

final state emission

Quasi-elastic scattering

3

Y0

Not so smallShift to LOWER Q2

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 101: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 102

The structure function method

bullElectron detected in a calorimeterbull The cross section is integrated on the scattered electron energy fraction

bullThe cross section

bullThe K-factor includes all non leading contributions

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 102: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 103

Structure function methodStructure function method

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 103: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 104

Unpolarized Cross sectionUnpolarized Cross section

Born +dipole FFs(=unpolarized experiment+MoampTsai)

SF (with dipole FFs)SF+2 exchange

Q2=3 GeV2

Q2=5 GeV2 SF change the slope

Q2=1 GeV2

2 exchange very small

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 104: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 105

Interference of 1 2 exchange

bullExplicit calculation for structureless proton

ndash The contribution is small for unpolarized and polarized ep scattering

ndash Does not contain the enhancement factor L

ndash The relevant contribution to K is ~ 1

EAKuraev V Bytev Yu Bystricky ET-G Phys Rev D74 013003 (2006)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 105: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 106

Polarization ratioPolarization ratio

Born SFSF+2 exchange

=60deg

2 destroys linearity

2 exchange very small

=80deg

=20deg

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 106: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 107

Correction (SF method)

Polarization data

JLab data

SLAC data

Yu Bystricky EAKuraev E T-G Phys Rev C 75 015207 (2007)

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 107: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 108

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 108: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 109

When GEp =0

0

bullJlab E01-109

ndash approved 072001072004

ndash scheduled 2007

ndash Spokepersons

Ch Perdrisat V Punjabi

M Jones E Brash

ndash 20 Laboratories 80 people

bullHall A =gt Hall CbullNew polarimeter bullNew calorimeter

bullGep IV up to 12 GeV2

after the upgrade of Cebaf

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 109: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 110

Conclusions and PerspectivesbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 110: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 111

FF measurement projected accuracy (Frascati)

Integrated luminosity 700-1000 pb-1

KLOE in last 12 months 1800 pb-1 at mass

prototne

proton neutron

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 111: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 112

Perspectives in Time-Like region

Frascati

Panda

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP

Page 112: CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, 2007 1 Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France

Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel July 31 2007CEA DSM Dapnia 113

ConclusionsbullFundamental measurement the electric and the

magnetic distributions of the proton are differentbullExtension at larger q2

ndash In SL region

observe a zero of GEp ndash In TL region

bull Separation of GE and GM

bull Access their relative phase (polarization)

Novosibirsk-VEPP3

through the angular dependence of differential cross section and polarization observables

Coherent description in SL and TL regions

Revise radiative corrections IHEP