ccsso criteria for procuring and evaluating high-quality ... · and evaluating high-quality...

CCSSO Criteria for Procuring and

Evaluating High-Quality Assessments –

Effective Uses by States

Prepared by Student Achievement Partners for NCSA 2016

Learning Objectives

• Participants will have a high-level

understanding of the

ELA/literacy and Mathematics

alignment criteria (Sections B

and C) from the CCSSO “Criteria

for Procuring and Evaluating

High-Quality Assessments.”

• Participants will learn about

specific ways states have

incorporated the Criteria into

their assessment programs.

http://www.achievethecore.org


Sections of the Criteria for Procuring and

Evaluating High-Quality Assessments

A. Meet Overall Assessment Goals and Ensure

Technical Quality

B. Align to Standards – English Language

Arts/Literacy

C. Align to Standards – Mathematics

D. Yield Valuable Reports on Student Progress and

Performance

E. Adhere to Best Practices in Test Administration

F. State Specific Criteria (as desired)

http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2014/CCSSO%20Criteria%20for%20High%20Quality%20Assessment

s%2003242014.pdf



http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2014/CCSSO Criteria for High Quality Assessments 03242014.pdf

Section B. Align to Standards – ELA/Literacy

Criterion B.1: Assessing student reading and writing

achievement in both ELA and literacy

Criterion B.2: Focusing on complexity of texts

Criterion B.3: Requiring students to read closely and use

evidence from texts

Criterion B.4: Requiring a range of cognitive demand

Criterion B.5: Assessing writing

Criterion B.6: Emphasizing vocabulary and language skills

Criterion B.7: Assessing research and inquiry

Criterion B.8: Assessing speaking and listening

Criterion B.9: Ensuring high-quality items and a variety of

item types



Format of the CCSSO Criteria for Procuring

and Evaluating High-Quality Assessments

B.5 Assessing writing:

Assessments

emphasize writing

tasks that require

students to engage

in close reading

and analysis of

texts so that

students can

demonstrate

college- and

career-ready

abilities.

Test blueprints and other specifications as well as exemplar test

items for each grade level are provided, demonstrating the

expectations below are met.

Writing tasks reflect the types of writing that will prepare students

for the work required in college and the workplace, balancing

expository, persuasive/argument, and narrative writing, as state

standards require. At higher grade levels, the balance shifts towards

more exposition and argument.

For example, for common core aligned assessments, goals include:

o Taking all forms of the test together, writing tasks are

approximately one-third each exposition, argument, and

narrative (some tasks may represent blended structures), with

the balance shifting towards more exposition and argument

at the higher grade levels.

Tasks (including narrative tasks) require students to confront text or

other stimuli directly, to draw on textual evidence, and to support

valid inferences from text or stimuli.



Criterion B.1

Assessing student reading and writing

achievement in both ELA and literacy:

The assessments are English language arts and

literacy tests that are based on an aligned balance of

high-quality literary and informational texts.

Key phrase: “aligned balance”

Key phrase: “high-quality”



Aligned Balance of High-Quality Texts

Aligned Balance:

• CCR standards, and thus, CCR assessments, call for

increased emphasis on informational text as

students move through the grade levels so they will

be prepared for the kinds of texts most often

encountered in college and the workplace.

High Quality:

• Texts should be worthy of students’ time and

attention. Well-crafted texts support the kind of

close reading and deep analysis required by CCR

standards. The evidence descriptors for B.1 speak

to texts being either previously published or of

publishable quality.



B.1: Informational Text Quality

Non-CCR Text CCR-Aligned Text

Are you tired and sleepy when you wake up in the morning? Do you think your school starts far too early in the morning for you to learn effectively? What would you say if you learned that researchers think the same thing?It’s true. Recent research has shown that teenagers benefit when high school starts later in the day. Researchers have found that teenagers, an age group more likely to stay awake late into the night, benefit when school starts at a time allowing them to sleep later in the morning.

…To help sleepy teens, some school districts have tried delaying the opening of the high school day. Educational researcher Kyla Wahlstrom, from the University of Minnesota, has been following districts that changed their start times, tracking the effect on schools and students. The Minneapolis school district, for example, changed its start time from 7:20 to 8:40 a.m., giving its 12,000 high schoolers an extra hour and twenty minutes each morning. Wahlstrom says the students have benefited from the change…

“What Time Should High Schools Start?” Commissioned for Assessment

“High Schools Staring Later to Help Sleepy Teens’ by Michelle Trudeau (g. 7 text)



Criterion B.2

Focusing on complexity of texts:

The assessments require appropriate levels of text

complexity; they raise the bar for text complexity

each year so students are ready for the demands of

college- and career-level reading no later than the end

of high school. Multiple forms of authentic, previously

published texts are assessed, including written,

audio, visual, and graphic, as technology and

assessment constraints permit.

Key phrase: “appropriate levels”

Key phrase: “raise the bar”



Emphasis on Text Complexity

Appropriate Levels:

• The evidence descriptors for this criterion outline

an expectation for a process of determining text

complexity, using both quantitative and qualitative

tools and transparency around the associated

results.

Raise the Bar:

• The evidence descriptors note that texts should

increase in complexity as students move through

the grades, meeting college- and career- readiness

standards by the end of high school.



Criterion B.3

Requiring students to read closely and use

evidence from texts:

Reading assessments consist of test questions or

tasks, as appropriate, that demand that students read

carefully and deeply and use specific evidence from

increasingly complex texts to obtain and defend

correct responses.

Key phrase: “carefully and deeply”

Key phrase: “use specific evidence”



Reading Closely and Using Evidence

Reading Carefully and Deeply:

• The evidence descriptors for B.3 detail that test

questions should arise from and require close

reading and analysis of text and focus on the

central ideas and important particulars of the text.

• Also, the criterion addresses the need for questions

to assess the depth and specific requirements

delineated in the standards at each grade level.



Reading Closely and Using Evidence

Using Specific Evidence:

• The evidence descriptors call for many test

questions to require students to directly point to

textual evidence in support of a claim or inference.

This aligns to research-based CCR standards, as the

ability to develop claims and support them with

evidence from text(s) is crucial for college and

career readiness.



B.3: Traditional vs. CCR Item

Traditional CCR

Click on the sentence in paragraph 19 that the author uses to show what Gram thinks about Old Faithful.

Paragraph 19 included here for reference:

More steam, boiling and hissing, and a huge jing-bang spray of water surged out, climbing and climbing, and then more and more, until it looked like a whole river of water was shooting straight up into the air. “It looks like an upsidey-down waterfall!” Gram said. All the while there was a walloping hissing, and I could have sworn the ground rumbled and trembled underneath us. The warm mist blew toward us and people started backing away.

CA: “It looks like an upsidey-down waterfall!” Gram said.

When the family first arrives at Old Faithful, Sal says, “I was afraid Gram was going to be disappointed because it didn’t look like much at first.” Circle three paragraphs that show that Gram was not disappointed in Old Faithful.

CA: Students should circle three paragraphs from the following options: 20, 22, 24, 25, or 26.

Associated text: Walk Two Moons by Sharon Creech



Criterion B.4

Requiring a range of cognitive demand:

The assessments require all students to demonstrate

a range of higher-order, analytical thinking skills in

reading and writing based on the depth and

complexity of college- and career-ready standards,

allowing robust information to be gathered for

students with varied levels of achievement.

Key word: “range”



Cognitive Demand

Range of Demand:

• The evidence descriptors for B.4 describe the

requirement that assessments should include a

range of cognitive demand that is appropriate to

the CCR standards themselves.



Criterion B.5

Assessing writing:

Assessments emphasize writing tasks that require

students to engage in close reading and analysis of

texts so that students can demonstrate college- and

career-ready abilities.

Key phrase: “analysis of texts”



Writing to Sources

Analysis of Texts:

• The criteria outline a shift from a traditional

emphasis on writing that calls for students to use

only their prior knowledge or experience. Instead,

the criteria, like CCR standards, place a premium

on writing to sources. This approach requires that

students use evidence from texts to present careful

analyses, well-defended claims, and clear

information.



Criterion B.6

Emphasizing vocabulary and language skills:

The assessments require students to demonstrate

proficiency in the use of language, including

vocabulary and conventions.

Key word: “proficiency”



Vocabulary and Language

Vocabulary:

• The evidence descriptors for vocabulary focus on

general academic (Tier 2) words, asking students to

use context to determine meaning, and assessing

words that are important to the central ideas of the

text.

Language:

• The evidence descriptors for language questions

state that these items should mirror real-world

activities (e.g., actual editing or revision, actual

writing) and focus on common student errors and

those conventions most important for readiness.



Criterion B.7

Assessing research and inquiry:

The assessments require students to demonstrate

research and inquiry skills, demonstrated by the

ability to find, process, synthesize, organize, and use

information from sources.

Key phrase: “use information from sources”



Criterion B.8

Assessing speaking and listening:

Over time, and as assessment advances allow, the

assessments measure the speaking and listening

communication skills students need for college and

career readiness.

Key word: “communication”



Criterion B.9

Ensuring high-quality items and a variety of item

types:

High-quality items and a variety of types are

strategically used to appropriately assess the

standard(s).

Key phrase: “high-quality”

Key phrase: “strategically used”

Key word: “variety”



Use of Item Types

High Quality:

• The previous eight criteria underlie this one. For

example, based on the criteria, reading items are

high quality when they are based on complex text,

and require close reading, analysis, and use of

evidence. Another example: questions and prompts

calling for writing are considered high quality when

they are text based.

Variety of Item Types Strategically Used:

• A variety of item types, used in meaningful ways, is

requisite to assess the full depth and complexity of

CCR standards.



Summary of Section B of the CCSSO Criteria for

Procuring and Evaluating High-Quality

Assessments

Section B is based on key findings about college and career

readiness in ELA/literacy. To be CCR, students must:

1. Be adept at reading high-quality informational texts as well as

literature (B.1).

2. Regularly encounter texts with appropriate and challenging

text complexity (B.2).

3. Continually read and think deeply (B.3, B.4).

4. Use and cite textual evidence in support of claims and

inferences (B.3, B.5, B.9).

5. Be proficient in vocabulary, language, and research (B.6.

B.7), as well as speaking and listening (B.8).



Section C. Align to Standards - Mathematics

Criterion C.1: Focusing strongly on the content most

needed for success in later

mathematics

Criterion C.2: Assessing a balance of concepts,

procedures, and applications

Criterion C.3: Connecting practice to content

Criterion C.4: Requiring a range of cognitive demand

Criterion C.5: Ensuring high-quality items and a

variety of item types



Criterion C.1

Focusing strongly on the content most needed for

success in later mathematics: The assessments help

educators keep students on track to readiness by

focusing strongly on the content most needed in each

grade or course for later mathematics.

Key phrase: “focusing strongly”



C.1.1 –Major, Supporting, and Additional Clusters for

Grade 5

Emphases are given at the cluster level. Refer to the Common

Core State Standards for Mathematics for the specific standards

that fall within each cluster.

Major Clusters

5.NBT.A – Understand the place value system.5.NBT.B – Perform operations with multi-digit whole numbers and with decimals to hundredths.5.NF.A – Use equivalent fractions as a strategy to add and subtract fractions.5.NF.B – Apply and extend previous understandings of multiplication and division to multiply and divide fractions.5.MD.C. – Geometric measurement: understand concepts of volume and relate volume to multiplication and to addition.

Supporting Clusters

5.MD.A – Convert like measurement units within a given measurement system.5.MD.B – Represent and interpret data.

Additional Clusters

5.OA.A – Write and interpret numerical expressions.5.OA.B – Analyze patterns and relationships. 5.G.A. – Graph points on the coordinate plane to solve real-world and mathematical problems.5.G.B – Classify two-dimensional figures into categories based on their properties.



C.1 – Criteria evaluation of focus for CCSS-

aligned assessments

• For common core aligned assessments, the assessments

focus strongly on the content most important for students

to master in order to reach college and career readiness:

– In elementary grades, approximately three-quarters or

more of the points in each grade align exclusively to the

Major work of the grade;

– In middle school grades, approximately two-thirds or

more of the points in each grade align exclusively to the

Major work of the grade; and

– In high school, approximately half or more of the

points in each course align exclusively to prerequisites

for careers and a wide range of postsecondary studies.



Criterion C.2

Assessing a balance of concepts, procedures, and

applications: The assessments measure conceptual

understanding, fluency and procedural skill, and

application of mathematics, as set out in college- and

career-ready standards.



C.2 – The Importance of Balance

Conceptual Understanding

Procedural Skill and Fluency

Application

Achievement



C.2 – Criteria Evidence Descriptors

What does “balance” mean for mathematics

assessments?

Two evidence descriptors for Criterion C.2 explain:

• The distribution of score points reflects a balance

of mathematical concepts, procedures/fluency, and

applications, as the state’s standards require.

• All students, whether high performing or low

performing, are required to respond to items within

the categories of conceptual understanding,

procedural skill and fluency, and applications, so

that they have the opportunity to show what they

know and can do.



Criterion C.3

Connecting practice to content: The assessments

include brief questions and also longer questions that

connect the most important mathematical content of

the grade or course to mathematical practices, for

example, modeling and making mathematical

arguments.

Key word: “connect”



C.3 – The Importance of Connections

• Focus and practices are not separate ideas. They

work together. Focus ensures we have time to treat

the material in-depth. The practices are partly what

"in-depth" looks like according to the standards. So

practices have to connect to content - preferentially

to the most important content - or else they aren't

consistent with the standards' design for higher

achievement.

What does “connect” mean for mathematics

assessments?



C.3 – Criterion Evidence Descriptors

• Assessments for each grade and course

meaningfully connect mathematical practices and

processes with mathematical content (especially

with the most important mathematical content at

each grade), as required by the state’s standards.

• Explanatory materials (citing test blueprints and

other specifications) describe the connection, for

each grade or course, between content and

mathematical practices and processes.



C.3 – Criterion Required Evidence for CCSS

• Every test item that assesses mathematical

practices is also aligned to one or more content

standards (most often within the major work of the

grade)



Criterion C.4

Requiring a range of cognitive demand: The assessments

require all students to demonstrate a range of higher-order,

analytical thinking skills in mathematics based on the depth

and complexity of college- and career-ready standards,

allowing robust information to be gathered for students with

varied levels of achievement. Assessments include questions,

tasks, and prompts about the basic content of the grade or

course as well as questions that reflect the complex

challenge of college- and career-ready standards.

Key word: “range”



C.4 – Evidence Descriptors

• Test blueprints and other specifications are

provided to demonstrate that the distribution of

cognitive demand for each grade level is sufficient

to assess the depth and complexity of the state’s

standards, as evidenced by use of a generic

taxonomy (e.g., Webb’s Depth of Knowledge) or,

preferably, classifications specific to the discipline

and drawn from mathematical factors, such as:

– Mathematical topic coverage in the task;

– Nature of reasoning;

– Nature of computation;

– Nature of application;

– Cognitive actions



CCSSO Criterion C.5

Ensuring high-quality items and a variety of item

types: High-quality items and a variety of item types

are strategically used to appropriately assess the

standard(s).

Key word: “strategically”



C.5 – Evidence Descriptors

What does “strategically” mean for mathematics

assessments?

• Specifications are provided to demonstrate that the

distribution of item types for each grade level and

content area is sufficient to strategically assess the

depth and complexity of the standards being addressed.

• To support claims of quality the following are provided:

– The list and distribution of the types of work

students will be asked to produce

– Exemplar items for each item type used in each

grade band

– Rationales for the use of the specific item types

– Specifications showing the proportion of item types

on a form



State Panelists

• Irene Hunting, Deputy Associate Superintendent,

Assessment Section, Arizona Department of

Education

• Rebecca Kockler, Assistant Superintendent of

Academic Content, Louisiana Department of

Education

• Tracy Gruber, Education Programs Supervisor,

Nevada Department of Education

• Miah Daughtery, K-12 Literacy Coordinator,

Tennessee Department of Education



Circling Back to Our Learning Objectives

• We hope you now feel more familiar with the

specific criteria (Sections B and C) from the CCSSO

“Criteria for Procuring and Evaluating High-Quality

Assessments.”

• Additionally, we hope that you have heard about

some actionable ways to incorporate the criteria

into your assessment programs to reach the goal of

producing high-quality, college- and career-

readiness assessments.

