ccp4 study week-end 2012 - univie.ac.at€¦ · ccp4 study week-end 2012 programme (titles may not...
TRANSCRIPT
CCP4 study week-end 2012
Highlights from the
CCP4 Study Week-End 2012University of Warwick
Tim GrüneUniversity of Göttingen
Dept. of Structural Chemistry
http://[email protected]
Tim Grüne 1/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
Programme
(titles may not be original but short content descriptions)
Thursday 5 JanuaryR. Keegan What’s New in CCP4J. Turkenburg/ K. McAuley Opening the MeetingZ. Dauer Effective data collection and processingJ. Holton Signal vs. Noise . . .A. Leslie Autoindexing: theory & practiceJ. Pflugrath d*TrekP. Evans How good are my data, and what’s the resolution?K. Diederichs Data quality measures that are or should be usedJ.-P. Abrahams Processing electron diffraction data . . .T. White Crystallographic data processing for FELsA. McCarthy The mini-kappa goniometer headG. Evans µ-sized X-ray beams and their application
Tim Grüne 2/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
Programme
(titles may not be original but short content descriptions)
Friday 6 JanuaryA. Popov Features and developments of BESTG. Winter automated processing with xia2N. Sauter new methods in phenix for the FELT. Skarzynski Evolution of home sourcesE. Gordon How the ESRF helps industry and how they help usA. Wagner Advances in automated sample mountingM. Mueller Optimal data collection for PilatusT. Krojer (SGC) squeezing the most from every crystalD. Stuart In-situ data collection at synchrotronsW. Hendrickson Multi-crystal anomalous data for low resolution phasing
Tim Grüne 3/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
Main Focus of this Talk
• New Programs: Ample, Zanuda, Nautilus
• Z. Dauter / J. Holton “Take-home messages”
• Armin Mueller (Diamond-I23): optical tweezers for automated crystal mounting.
• Rob Nicholls’ ProSmart: external restraints for refmac5
• Phil Evans/ Kay Diederichs: How to set the resolution limit
• M. Mueller: fine-slicing for Pilatus
Tim Grüne 4/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
New Programs
Ample (Jaclyn Bibby): Ab initio method for macromolecules
1. monte-carlo based modelling of starting fragments (rosetta)
2. 1,000s – 10,000s of models⇒ clustering of solutions
3. MR (phaser), solution check with shelxe
• Resolution range: about 2 Å
• Good performance with α-helical proteins
• 40–80h runtime as pipeline (rosetta→ clustering→ phaser→ shelxe)
• Supposed to also work for nucleic acids
Tim Grüne 5/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
New Programs
Zanuda (Andrey Lebedev): Refinement based checking of space group
• Intended in cases of putative twinning or pseudo-translation (wrong origin)
• e.g. Rfree stuck at 40 %
• example: 1YUP deposited with P1; Zanuda→ P21
• Not intended for checking for screw-axes (probably better use phaser)
• accessible through server at YSBL
Tim Grüne 6/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
New Programs
Nautilus (Kevin Cowtan): Autobuidling of nucleic acids
• similar to buccaneer: features of density, points of low and of high density (like knuspr)
• backbone building based on phosphater and sugars
• new: takes sequence into account (initial release: poly-U only)
• resolution as low as 3.2–3.5 Å
The current documentation (http://www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/˜cowtan/nautilus/nautilus.html) still refers to the initialrelease (poly-U), and users might have to wait until the release of ccp4 6.3.0.
Tim Grüne 7/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
“Take-Home Messages” . . .
Z. Dauter, in discussion with E. Garman
• Data collection is the last experiment
• goals for
native data high resolution (, multiplicity)
Molecular replacement medium resolution, no overloads
heavy atom derivative medium resolution, no overloads
anomalous signal accurate, complete low resolution (avoid radiation damage)
• Generally: data completeness comes before resolution — rather drop a few 0.1 Å than destroy the crystalwith radiation before data collection is complete
Tim Grüne 8/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
“Take-Home Messages” . . .
James Holton
Main Reasons for Failure of Structure Solution
• Overlaps
• Radiation damage
• Signal to noise
Complete presentation available at http://bl831.als.lbl.gov/˜jamesh/powerpoint/CCP4SW SvN 2012.ppt
Tim Grüne 9/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
James Holton: Avoiding Overlaps
Slide courtesy James Holton
Or use a mini-κ, now available at many synchrotrons.
Spot separation is smallest when the long unit cell axis points parallel to the beam.Tim Grüne 10/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
James Holton: Detecting Radiation Damage
Slide courtesy James Holton
Tim Grüne 11/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
James Holton: Chemicals Amplify the Dose
Slide courtesy James Holton
Tim Grüne 12/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
James Holton: Signal to Noise / Exposure Time
Slides courtesy James Holton
Tim Grüne 13/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
James Holton: Exposure Time and Refinement
Slide courtesy James Holton
Tim Grüne 14/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
Armin Wagner: Optical Tweezers for small crystals
Armin Wagner: Beamline I23 at Diamond Light Source
Optical Trapping
• A Ashkin (1969)– First successful acceleration and
trapping of particles by radiation pressure
A Ashkin PNAS (1997) 94, 4853-4860
slide courtesy A. Wagner
Tim Grüne 15/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
Armin Wagner: Optical Tweezers for small crystals
Gradient Trapsa
a
b
blaser beam
high NA objective
FaFb
– Scattering and gradient forces are balanced in a tightly focussed laser beam using a high numerical aperture objective lens to form a stable 3-dimensional trap
Fscat
bea
m d
irect
ion
Fgrad
Andy Ward (CLF)
slide courtesy A. Wagner, movie available at http://youtu.be/Th7F27xqULc
Tim Grüne 16/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
Rob Nicholls: ProSmart
http://www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/mxstat/Rob/index.html
“ProSMART (Procrustes Structural Matching Alignment and Restraint Tool) is a software tool designedfor the conformation-independent structural comparison of protein chains.”
• Pairwise alignment of protein sequences based on local conformation — distances within 9 residuesfragments are generated and compared
• Preparation of input file for refmac5 with external restraints
• Useful at low resolution if high resolution structure exists
• visualisation of conservation available in latest version of ccp4mg
• Recommendation: Use latest version refmac5.7 (http://www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/refmac/latest refmac.html)
Tim Grüne 17/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
Rob Nicholls: ProSmart
Refmac input script:
EXTERNAL WEIGHT SCALE 100
@../input_files/restraints_chainA.text
exte dist first chain A resi 36 ins . atom N second chain A resi 36 ins . atom O value 3.50046 sigma 0.1
Refmac log-file example:
---------------------------------------
Standard External All
Bonds: 44085 13716 57801
Angles: 78639 0 78639
Chirals: 4585 0 4585
Planes: 8544 0 8544
Torsions: 18235 0 18235
---------------------------------------
Tim Grüne 18/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
ProSmart Caveat: Model Bias
My experience with ProSmart in case of low resolution and low similarity:
Strong Model Bias during refinement
Work-around:
1. Run blast search (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)against PDB and download multiple sequencealignment
2. Use “ConSurf” (http://consurf.tau.ac.il) to assignsimilarity scores to B-factor column in model PDBfile
3. Cut out conserved atoms4. run ProSmart with modified PDB-file
Tim Grüne 19/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
Discussion: How to set Data Set Resolution
Phil Evans
How to define “Resolution”? Cut data where adding the next resolution shell does not add information to thedata anymore.
How to determine “Information”?
Rmerge/Rmeas: Useful figures, but not for resolution cut-off!
I/σI > 2: Good, but dependent on proper determination of σI
CC1/2: (Called CC Imean in Scala log file)
• Randomly divide data in to two equal sets
• Calculate CC of equivalent reflections between both sets
• Cut resolution e.g. where CC1/2 < 50%
Independent of σI-values;
Tim Grüne 20/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
Phil Evans: Tests w.r.t CC1/2
Anisotropy
Many (perhaps most) datasets are anisotropicThe principal directions of anisotropy are defined by symmetry (axes or planes), except in the monoclinic and triclinic systems, in which we can calculate the orthogonal principle directions
We can then analyse half-dataset CCs or I/σ(I) in cones around the principle axes, or as projections on to the axes
Cones
Projections
I/σ(I) in cones1.91Å
2.15Å
2.00Å
Anisotropic cutoffs are probably a Bad Thing, since it leads to strange series termination errors and problem with intensity statistics
So where should we cut the data?Maybe at some compromise point
Monday, 9 January 2012
slide courtesy Phil Evans
Tim Grüne 21/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
Phil Evans: Tests w.r.t CC1/2
Case 1:656 amino acids, omit sugars, shake structure, refine at different resolutionsSpace group R32 (aka H32)
2.1Å
Half-dataset CCs:overallalong c*perpendicular to c*
1.8Å 2.0Å 2.2Å 2.4Å
Conclusion: not a huge difference
2.4Å
Some very preliminary tests of the effect of different resolution cutoffs
2mFo-DFc
mFo-DFc
figures made with ccp4mg
Monday, 9 January 2012
slide courtesy Phil Evans
Tim Grüne 22/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
Phil Evans: Tests w.r.t CC1/2
3.0Å 2.4Å 2.0Å 1.8Å
Rfree 0.294 Rfree 0.282 Rfree 0.285 Rfree 0.290
2.2Å
Rfree 0.284
figures made with ccp4mg
Case 2: 3 molecules/asu, omit 22/276 residues from each molecule, model build with Arp/warp at different resolutions
0
23
47
70
1.8 1.9 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4
Number of residues built and sequenced
Cones
1.91Å
2.15Å
2.00Å2.00Å
R & Rfree after initial refinement
Conclusion: there is not a huge difference
Monday, 9 January 2012
slide courtesy Phil Evans
Tim Grüne 23/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
Marcus Mueller: effect of fine-slicing on data quality with the Pilatus detector
(published: Mueller et al, Acta Cryst D68, 2012, p. 42–56)
• Collected 94 data sets from Insulin, Lysozyme, Thaumatin, Thermolysin at SLS, Pilatus 6M
• variation of ∆φ (0.01◦ – 1.28◦)
• data processed with XDS
• data publicly available (we have a copy)
Tim Grüne 24/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
Marcus Mueller: effect of fine-slicing on data quality with the Pilatus detector
• Statistics in highest resolution shell• left x-axis: ∆φ/mosaicity; right y-axis:
normalised to best value in each series• minimum reached at ∆φ ≈ 0.5σφ (σφ:
from Gaussian profile fitting in XDS)• Overall statistics: less pronounced
Tim Grüne 25/26
CCP4 study week-end 2012
Acknowledgments
The following people made their talk material available to me to prepare this seminar:
James Holton http://bl831.als.lbl.gov/˜jamesh/powerpoint/CCP4SW SvN 2012.ppt
Armin Wagner http://youtu.be/Th7F27xqULc
Phil Evans
Kay Diederichs
Tim Grüne 26/26