ccd presentation template - denver ps financials ps hr ps crm denvergov enterprise cashiering gis...
TRANSCRIPT
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
Technology Services
JUN|2012
Peak Metrics Report Out
- 2 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Vision Alignment
Citywide Vision: We will deliver a world-class city where everyone matters.
Agency Vision : We will become the nation’s model for delivery of technology,
media, and contact center services for local government
Routine O & M
Incremental Changes/
Upgrades
Business
Opportunities
Strategic Partnership
and Innovation
Tactical
Strategic
- 3 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Technology Services – Four Goals
Foster Environment of Employee Engagement
Master Operational Efficiency
Improve the Productivity and Satisfaction of City Agencies
Government Information and Services in the Hands of Residents
Anytime, Anywhere
- 4 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Service Value Chain – Adapted for Public Sector
Internal
Process
Quality
Employee
Engagement
External
Service
Value
Citizen
Satisfaction
Agency
Satisfaction
Citizen
Confidence
Citizen
Trust
Internal Performance Service
Concept External Performance
Mission Measures
(And other factors)
Value
Source: Adapted from Ralph Heintzman, Brian Marson; People, Service, and Trust: Is there a Public Sector Service Value Chain? Paper prepared
for the Annual Conference of the European Group of Public Administration, September 3-6, 2003, p. 4
- 5 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Mission Metrics Dashboard: Technology Services
Internal Process Quality
TS Problems Jan - May 2012
2
9
0
9
2
5
8
0
2
8
1
5
3
1
6
2
2
8
6
5
2
5
7
9
2
5
0
5
2
6
8
9
3
0
7
5
2
8
5
1
9
2
6
1
0
0
1
1
1
2
7
1
2
1
4
1
2
2
8
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Jan Feb Mar Apr May
Incidents Received Incidents Resolved Outstanding Incidents (Accumulative)
- 6 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Mission Metrics Dashboard: Technology Services
Internal Process Quality
TS Work Orders Jan - May 2012
4
8
8
7
4
0
5
1
4
4
4
2
4
9
7
7
4
6
9
1
4
3
3
6
3
8
3
4
4
2
7
0
4
7
6
4
4
5
9
1
1
4
2
2
1
6
3
9
1
8
1
1
2
0
2
4
2
1
2
4
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May
Work Orders Received Work Orders Resolved Outstanding Work Orders (Accumulative)
- 7 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Mission Metrics Dashboard: Technology Services
Internal Process Quality
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Jan Feb Mar Apri May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Tic
kets
Network & Telecom / 911 Systems Tickets Over 30 Days: Problems
2009 2010 2011 2012
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Jan Feb Mar Apri May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Tic
kets
Network & Telecom / 911 Systems Tickets Over 30 Days: Work Orders
2009 2010 2011 2012
- 8 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Mission Metrics Dashboard: Technology Services
Internal Process Quality
563
572
576
596
626
1234
1495
1651
2171
2526
Install Software
Information Update (Active Directory/HEAT)
Reset Safety Application Password
New Employee
Desktop PC
Wrong Number
Permissions
Unlock LAN Account
Question IT
Reset LAN Password
0 1000 2000 3000
HEAT Work Orders (Top 10 By Item) Jan - May 2012
351
362
442
459
461
607
621
717
925
1484
Network
KRONOS
Windows on Desktop or Laptop
Printer Network
Auto Ticket
Alfresco
Outlook
Desk Phone
Desktop PC
0 500 1000 1500 2000
HEAT Problem Tickets (Top 10 By Item) Jan - May 2012
- 9 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Mission Metrics Dashboard: Technology Services
Internal Process Quality
1st Call Resolution
50.6%
48.3% 47.9%
49.4% 50.2%
49.6%
53.4% 53.3%
51.5%
57.3%
52.4%
55.1%
59.7% 59.6% 60.4% 60.4%
56.7%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
55.0%
60.0%
65.0%
70.0%
1st Call Resolution % Target Launched SD Reorg
- 10 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Mission Metrics Dashboard: Technology Services
External Service Value
239
193
224
243 251
181 176
197 183 186
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Jan Feb Mar April May
tickets
Problem Tickets Escalated to Advanced Support
Tickets in 2011 Tickets in 2012
452
345
392 400 392
375
299 316
369
310
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Jan Feb Mar April May
Tic
kets
Work Orders Escalated to Advanced Support
Tickets in 2011 Tickets in 2012
- 11 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Mission Metrics Dashboard: Technology Services
Internal Process Quality
Average Speed to Answer Service Desk telephone metrics
in place since April 2012
Average Speed to Answer is a
solid indication of good
customer support since the
Service Desk Reorganization.
Average Speed to Answer is
around 53 seconds.
Solid performance with current
staffing levels.
52
65
45
60
37
64
46
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
4/15/12 4/22/12 4/29/12 5/6/12 5/13/12 5/20/12 5/27/12
S
E
C
O
N
D
S
Average Speed to Answer (secs) Target (Not to exceed 60 secs)
- 12 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Mission Metrics Dashboard: Technology Services
External Service Value
Alfresco PS Financials PS HR PS CRM DenverGov Enterprise Cashiering
GIS RMS/JMS
Q2 1 1 0 0 14 0 0 0
Q3 1 7 1 6 16 0 1 2
Q4 0 7 0 1 5 2 1 7
Q1 5 4 0 1 4 1 3 4
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Nu
mb
er
of
Ou
tag
es
Outages | Applications
- 13 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Mission Metrics Dashboard: Technology Services
External Service Value
Infrastructure/Storage
Messaging App Servers Core Network Telephony 911 Telephony Public Safety
Radio
Q2 0 0 2 2 1 0 0
Q3 9 5 14 4 3 1 0
Q4 1 2 3 1 2 1 0
Q1 1 1 3 0 0 1 0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Nu
mb
er
of
Ou
tag
es
Outages | Operations
- 14 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Mission Metrics Dashboard: Technology Services
External Service Value - 311
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2008 2009 2010 2011
% S
erv
ice L
ev
el
Service Level: Target & Actual
Svc Lvl
SL Target
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2008 2009 2010 2011
AS
A (
sec)
ASA: Target vs. Actual
ASA (sec)
ASA Target
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Nu
mb
er
of
Ag
en
ts
2011 Authorized & Actual Agents
2011 Auth
2011 Actual
- 15 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Transformation Plan: Technology Services 1|12 2|12 3|12 4|12 5|12 6|12 7|12 8|12 9|12 10|12 11|12 12|12
Go
al 3
: Im
pro
ve C
ity
Ag
en
cy S
ati
sfa
ctio
n
Go
al 4
: In
form
ati
on
an
d
Se
rvic
es
to C
itiz
en
s,
an
ytim
e, a
nyw
he
re
Go
al 1
:Fo
ste
r E
mp
loye
e
En
ga
ge
me
nt
Go
al 2
: Ma
ste
r
Op
era
tio
na
l Eff
icie
ncy
Strategy 4: Invest in Lean Six Sigma
Strategy 3: Address deficiencies and opportunities in Employee Survey
Strategy 1: Attract and retrain a skilled IT workforce
Strategy 2: Develop a plan to staff TS, consistent with this strategy
Strategy 1: Document and execute repeatable operational processes
Strategy 2: Procure tools to effectively manage operational systems and processes
Strategy 3: Adopt “cloud first’
Strategy 4: Modernize Data Centers and Infrastructure
Strategy 5: Realize full value of our Enterprise Architecture and Enterprise Applications
Strategy 1: Develop an effective system to understand agency needs
Strategy 2: Develop PM processes based on industry standards
Strategy 4: Facilitate work anytime, anywhere – mobility and collaboration
Strategy 3: Develop a plan for “light” technologies for agency empowered solutions
Strategy 5: improve accessibility and usability of City information
Strategy 1: Transform Denver 8 to a “media services” model”
Strategy 2: Prepare 311 to engage citizens proactively and through multiple contact channels
Strategy 3: Improve access to government information
Strategy 5: invest in technical traiining
Strategy 6: Develop a plan to fund TS, consistent with this strategy
Strategy 5: Invest in technical training
Strategy 4: Improve delivery of services via electronic channels
Strategy 5: Create a comprehensive strategy for social media
Strategy 6: Invest in delivery of information and services to mobile devices
- 16 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Improvement Activities
Goal 1 – Foster Employee Engagement
– Strategy 2: Through Peak Performance, develop a plan to staff Technology
Services in a sustainable manner, consistent with the goals of this strategic
plan
Goal 2 – Master Operational Efficiency
– Strategy 6: Through Peak Performance Program, Develop a sustainable
funding model for Technology Services, consistent with the goals of this
strategic plan
Actions Taken
– Completed 4 of 6 Strategic Resource Alignment Meetings with Governance
Council
– 1500+ hours of management time; 150 slides; 20+ business cases; 12+
vendors and consulted.
– 34 investment options across 12 service areas created and presented
– Cross-checked with two independent set of industry recognized/approved
metrics (Gartner and Computer Economics)
- 17 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Improvement Activities
Goal 1 – Foster Employee Engagement
– Strategy 3: Address deficiencies and opportunities from Employee
Survey
Actions Taken
– Developed and communicated Strategy, Goals, and Objectives
– Tied individual performance to organizational goals through PEPs
– Created department-wide performance standards for PEPs/PEPRs
– Created Technology Services Leadership Blog to improve
communication
– Crucial Conversations training for all managers
– Better address issue of low job accountability
– Improved the project intake process
– Changed timing and frequency of weekly meetings to improve
communication
- 18 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Improvement Activities
Goal 1 – Foster Employee Engagement
– Strategy 4: Invest in Lean Six Sigma
Actions Taken
– Finished all Green Belt Lean Six Sigma Projects (3 of 5 finished successfully)
– PeopleSoft Customizations:
• Goal: reduce low value customizations by 20%, saving $947K over three upgrade
cycles
• Process, forms, governance, measurements all implemented
– Storage Area Network
• Goal: maximize investment in storage area network by revamping processes used
by projects to purchase storage; Project recovered and reallocated $161K in
storage to other areas of need
• Detailed analysis, reallocation, and department policy created and implemented
– Citywide Applications Savings & Efficiencies
• Goal: develop a repeatable process to inventory, evaluate, and transform (when
needed) applications to provide best solutions and support options
• Team developed a framework, scoring system, and ran six DHS applications as
test cases. One application is being retired.
- 19 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Improvement Activities Goal 2 – Master Operational Efficiency
– Strategy 1: Document and execute repeatable processes
Actions Taken
– Critical Incident Response process
• Internal and external communications have improved critical
incident response, proper resources are engaged and improved
incident documentation.
• Root Cause Analysis after all Critical Incidents has reduced
recurring problems and outages.
– Mailbox Delegation
• Provided process documentation enabling users to administer
their own mailbox delegation permissions.
– Recruiting for IT Service Management Coordinator
• 1st priority – implement a best-practices Change Management
process.
– Updated and improved our Service Catalog
- 20 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Improvement Activities Goal 2 – Master Operational Efficiency
– Strategy 2: Procure tools to effectively manage operational systems
and processes
Actions Taken
– RFP for IT Service Management (HEAT replacement) completed
– Service Desk Call Manager installed April 2012
– Implemented Insight License Manager for allocating and managing
software licenses
– Acquired Groundwork, a system monitoring tool, in Q1.
– Acquired funding to upgrade our Systems Center Configuration
Manager software
– Currently engaged in evaluating toolsets that enhance our monitoring
capabilities
– Continuous improvement of the Service Desk Wiki knowledge-base
- 21 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Improvement Activities Goal 2 – Master Operational Efficiency
– Strategy 2: Develop Portfolio and Project Management Processes
based on industry standards.
Actions Taken
– Developed and documented a Project Management Framework
including templates for key project artifacts and deliverables.
– Developed and documented a project intake process to track and
assess project requests for level of effort and business value.
– Maturing governance process for small and medium projects.
– Of the current 27 projects in flight, only 2 of these projects are in red
status (In March 2011, 7 of 24 projects were in red status).
- 22 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Improvement Activities Goal 3 – Understand, quantify, and improve productivity and
satisfaction of City Agencies
– Strategy 4: Facilitate work anytime, anywhere – mobility and collaboration
Actions Taken
– Mobile Device Working Group
– Mobile Device Advisory Group
– Research - met with Apple, Cisco, Gartner, attended conferences and
seminars.
– Realistic Approach - balance evolving technology against fiscal
responsibility.
– Created policies and strategies for Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and
city-supplied devices.
– Created plan to deploy WiFi in city buildings.
– Implementing a Mobile Device Management (MDM) software to ensure
security and management.
– Conducting on-site demos of hosted collaboration suites (e-mail,
document sharing, and instant messaging).
- 23 - Peak Metrics Report Out
KAEPPERFORMANCE
D E N V E R
March, 2012
Improvement Activities Goal 4 – Information and Services in the hands of Citizens,
anytime, anywhere
– Strategy 3: Improve access to government information
Actions Taken
– Participation in planning efforts for Code for Communities Hackathon
planned for the end of July in Colorado
– Hackathon has support from local, national, and international groups
– With support of the GIS steering committee, the GIS development
team has reworked priorities and is developing a framework for open
GIS data to be ready and available for the hackathon
– Denver will be lending additional support to the event in terms of both
personnel and social media marketing
– Working with the City Attorney’s Office to ensure that the release of
Denver data complies with the GIS ordinance and any other legal
requirements