ccc executive - consultation responses
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
1/21
ANNEXE
CONSULTATION COMMENTS
Page
269
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
2/21
Emails
Title Surname AreaOverall view of
proposalsKey issues
Mr Wilkinson Herne Bay Oppose Loss of sleep, impact on children and educational achievement, causes of anxiety andstress
Loss of jobs in domestic tourism negative impact on local businesses
Will not create many jobs
Airport proposals Thames Estuary makes Manston less viable
Miss Gilhooly Herne Bay Oppose Loss of sleep, impact on children and educational achievement,
Impact on health - causes anxiety and stress
Loss of jobs in domestic tourism negative impact on local businesses
Will not create many jobs
Airport proposals Thames Estuary makes Manston less viable
Dr Dean Rural Oppose Noise would be intolerable at night
Annonymous Cannot identify Oppose No to Cargo planes at night
No real economic benefit
Mr Chenery Herne Bay Oppose Noise and disruption of sleep
Mrs Blackmore Rural Unclear Reinstate Edinburgh route
Mr Hodges Herne Bay Oppose Manston can only attract noisy cargo planes
Visions of large scale international airport are unrealistic due to location
Limited economic benefits do not justify disruption at night
Why does the flight path come over Herne Bay should come in from the East
Lloyd Herne Bay Oppose Airport doesnt control routes properly nowNot full to capacity in the day so cant justify night flights
Sceptical about economic benefits
Disruption to sleep
Mr Williams Herne Bay Oppose Everyone entitled to a good night sleep
Negative impact on children to learn and health of residents
Page
270
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
3/21
Title Surname AreaOverall view of
proposalsKey issues
Mr Rainsbury Herne Bay Oppose Sceptical that proposal in help local economy
Thames Estuary proposal better located for international Airport
Sleep is a human right
Mrs Moss Rural Oppose Extension to night time flying would be intolerable
Lewis Herne Bay Oppose Economic benefits exaggerated
Noise pollution underestimated
Sleep a basic human right
Concerned that online consultation excludes older residents
Mr and Mrs Ward Herne Bay Oppose Sleep deprivation
Mrs Cook Herne Bay Oppose Disruption to sleep
Mr and Mrs Clark Herne Bay Oppose Occasional night flights disturb sleep now
Several flights a night would be intolerable
Should fill available day slotsCan only attract old cargo planes
Do not believe economic benefits
Wells Herne Bay Oppose Health and well-being concerns
Sleep issues
Cheesman Herne Bay Oppose Noise pollution
Impact on sleep- concerns with performance at school
Servadei Herne Bay Oppose Impact on sleep and health
Mr Kelly Herne Bay Oppose Noise
No new jobs
Mrs Cooney Whitstable Oppose Noise
Mr and Mrs Cawley Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Mr Greenleaf Herne Bay Support More employment
Manklow Herne Bay Oppose Level of noise pollution
Sleep issues
Page
271
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
4/21
Title Surname AreaOverall view of
proposalsKey issues
Mr and Mrs Andrews Herne Bay Oppose Chemical and noise pollution
Dr Meyer Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Lewis Herne Bay Oppose No economic benefitsNoise
Sleep issues
Mr Martin Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Sleep issues
Pollution
Not enough eceomic value added
Brett Herne Bay Oppose
Mr Dawson Cannot identify Support Job prospects
Jones Herne Bay Oppose Noise
No increase in the economyMr and Mrs Akbar Herne Bay Oppose
Herne Bay Oppose Noise levels will increase
Clubb Herne Bay Oppose Health
Spare capacity during day so this should be used first
Cargo planes are noisier
Night flights will not create more jobs
Staley Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Mr Taylor Whitstable Support Boost to economy
Parry Whitstable Support Boost to economy
Miss Jarrett Herne Bay Oppose Spare capacity during daytime
No major increase in jobs
Noise
Health issues
Mrs Pay Herne Bay Support Boost to job oportunities
Page
272
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
5/21
Title Surname AreaOverall view of
proposalsKey issues
Mr and Mrs Flack Herne Bay Oppose Disturbed sleep
Mr Rowden Herne Bay Oppose Increase in noise levels
No true evidence for increase in employmentMr Judson Rural Support More jobs
More passenger flights
Mr Brooks Herne Bay Oppose Noise disruption
Mr and Mrs Neale Herne Bay Oppose Noise levels
Spare capacity during daytime
No evidence of increase in job opportunities
Mr Cribbett Herne Bay Oppose Increase in noise levels
Sleep issues
Rhodes Herne Bay Oppose
JohnsonMr Cooke Whitstable Support Currently not being used enough
Economic growth
Cllr Peter
Vickery Jones
after
consultation
with
Canterbury
City Council
Members
Cannot identify Oppose
However they represent the extremes, of those who replied a big majority had the
view that although they broadly support a thriving Manston which would offer
convenience of travel and also much needed job opportunities, they do not support
night flights.
Mr and Mrs Martin Herne Bay Oppose
Woollett Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Sleep disturbance
Page
273
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
6/21
Title Surname AreaOverall view of
proposalsKey issues
Passenger and employment projections misleading
Mr Nordin Whitstable Oppose No economic prosperity
Brookfield Herne Bay Oppose Increased noise levelsHealth issues
Mr Cox Herne Bay Oppose Increased noise levels
Watley Herne Bay Oppose Noise levels
Disturbed sleep
Vacant daytime slots
No increase on job prosperity
Mr Allen Rural Support More choice to fly from
Economic growth
More jobs
Mr Power Cannot identify Support Encourage investmentIncrease employment
Wilkinson Herne Bay Oppose Increased noise levels
Hopper Herne Bay Oppose
Lloyd Herne Bay Oppose Too many different in bound routes
Day time slots available
Assumptions of increased employment not true
Disturbed sleep
No economic growth
Whiteley Herne Bay Oppose Increased noise
Mrs Mott Herne Bay Oppose Increase in flight traffic overnight
Mr Holton Herne Bay Unclear Disturbed sleep
Health issues
Mr Clements Herne Bay Oppose Disturbed sleep
Mr Smith Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Page
274
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
7/21
Title Surname AreaOverall view of
proposalsKey issues
Lacking in evidence to benefits
Mr Spencer Herne Bay Oppose Quality of life will be ruined
Sleep disturbance
Airport is on wrong place
Bayfield Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Only in it for a profit
Procter Herne Bay Oppose Disturbed sleep
Enough spare slots during the day
Green Canterbury Support Employment prospects
Regeneration of the area
Waller Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Quality of Life
Disturbed sleepFee Rural Support Kent needs jobs
Goodwin Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disruption
Rogers Herne Bay Oppose Noise nuisance
Sleep disturbance
Price Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbance
Health issues
Pollution
Flawed infromation about job creation
Walsh Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbance
Need to encourage people to the area, not drive them away
Mr and Mrs Young Herne Bay Oppose Infratils predictions are flawed and exaggerated
Increased noise levels and pollution
Increase in cargo flights will increase "onward" traffic, including noise and pollution
Support daytime flights
Page
275
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
8/21
Title Surname AreaOverall view of
proposalsKey issues
Dr Marsh Herne Bay Oppose Sleep deprivation
Noise
Pollution
Stress
Mr Pearce Canterbury Support Boost economy
Mrs Pearce More jobs created
Mr Pearce
Master Pearce
Master Pearce
Wilkins Herne Bay Oppose Increase in noise
Vibrations
Hudson Herne Bay Oppose Noise maps inaccurate
Impact on H/Bay understatedNoise levels
Sleep deprivation
Negative impact of night flights on the economy of East Kent not enumerated
Economic case not proved
Leonard Herne Bay Oppose Noise levels
Mrs Howe Herne Bay Oppose Noise levels
Airport not used to full capacity during the day
Quality of life
Mrs Mann Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbance
Smith Herne Bay OpposeMiss Robinson Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbance
Mr Matthews Herne Bay Support More jobs
Economy growth
Mr Cloke Herne Bay Oppose Noise levels
Page
276
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
9/21
Title Surname AreaOverall view of
proposalsKey issues
Langford Herne Bay Oppose Increased vibrations
Quality of life decreased
Dr Douglas Herne Bay Oppose Sleep deprivation
Health risks
Effects on children
Information misleading regarding job creation
Mrs Harding Herne Bay Oppose Sleep deprivation
Misleading flight path information
Job creation information misleading
Mr Harding Herne Bay Oppose Sleep deprivation
Misleading flight path information
Job creation information misleading
Mrs Morris Herne Bay Oppose Increased noiseSleep disturbance
Willows Herne Bay Oppose Affect sleep and health
Payne Whitstable Oppose Increased noise levels
Sleep disturbance
Mason Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbance
Mason Herne Bay Oppose Noise pollution
Mayland Herne Bay Oppose Noise levels increased
Mrs Rhodes Herne Bay Oppose Noise levels
Mr and Mrs Boulter Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disruption
Noise levels
Mr White Rural Support Encourage additional capacity
Thanet needs jobs
Growth of the economy
Mrs Riley Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbance
Page
277
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
10/21
Title Surname AreaOverall view of
proposalsKey issues
Mr Pettman Whitstable Support Thanet needs jobs
Limit night flights
Mr Davey Herne Bay Oppose Small gain in jobs
Adverse impact on those in flight path
Mr and Mrs Bowley Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbance
Physical health and wellbeing
Hours are too long for "night flights"
Day time slots not full
No more jobs created
Noise levels
Mr Maillardet Herne Bay Oppose Noise levels
Mr and Mrs Furneaux Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbance
Benefit to community does not stand upJob creation over estimated
Health concerns
Environment issues
Howes Herne Bay Oppose Sound pollution
Vibrations
Mr Jones Herne Bay Oppose Increase in noise levels
Devaluation of house values
Environmental impact
Mr Pratt Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Loss of sleepPollution - noise and air
Will not bring that many jobs
Newton Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbance
Parish Herne Bay Oppose Level of discomfort?
Page
278
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
11/21
Title Surname AreaOverall view of
proposalsKey issues
Bassett
Mr Cross Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Sleep disturbacne
Quality of life
Blackman Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Sleep disruption
Not an ideal location
Richardson Herne Bay Support Economic regeneration
Creat business and employment opportunities
Shepherd Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Mr Maling Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Not many new jobs created
Utilise daytime flying firstMr and Mrs Emery Whitstable Support Hopefully encourage new routes abroad for holidaymakers
Mrs Ridley Herne Bay Oppose Noise levels
Connors Herne Bay Oppose Noise levels
Vibrations to hosue
Health issues
Mr Rood Herne Bay Oppose Not using daytime availability enough
Job estimates exaggerated
Noisy
Safety issues
Mr Bennett Herne Bay Unclear MIA needs to challenge Independent Assessors Report
Blyth Rural Support Needs economic growth
Barnett More flights for local people
Brown Herne Bay Support Hope to bring in more airlines
Boost to economy
Page
279
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
12/21
Title Surname AreaOverall view of
proposalsKey issues
Charlesworth Herne Bay Oppose Report shows up exaggerations
Most other airports have minimal night time flights
Allows unlimited night flights
Sleep deprivation
Job increases are fictional
Would kill tourism
Noise
Lack of care for environment
Mr and Mrs Pool Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbance
Mrs Gambrill Herne Bay Oppose
Miss Round Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbance
Noise
The daytime slots are not filledWon't creat 3000 jobs
Mr Taylor Whitstable Support Increase in jobs
Stimulate the economy
Mr Parry Whitstable Support Major boost to the loacl area
Miss Jarrett Herne Bay Oppose Daytime slots not being used to full capacity
Job estimates exaggerated
Health
Safety
Sleep disturbance
Mrs Pay Herne Bay Support Need more airlines using ManstonMr and Mrs Flack Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Sleep disturbance
Mr Rowden Herne Bay Oppose Noise levels
Job creation figures flawed
Page
280
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
13/21
Title Surname AreaOverall view of
proposalsKey issues
Mr Judson Rural Support Support job creation
More passenger flights
Mr Brooks Herne Bay Oppose Flights into Manston do not have same restrictions as those taking off
Sleep disturbance
Mr and Mrs Neale Herne Bay Oppose Quality of Life
Noise levels
Airport not used enough during the day
Not enough jobs provided
Blake Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbance
Bosier Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbance
Noisy
Vibrations to the house
Rowbotham Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbanceTuck Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbance
Noise pollution
Property decrease in value
Mr Kent Herne Bay Support Noise not an issue
More holiday destinations?
Mr Howe Herne Bay Oppose Not enough enw jobs
Sleep deprivation
Slater Herne Bay Oppose Sleep deprivation
Mr Lockwood Herne Bay Oppose Disturbed sleep
Deterioration of air qualityNo economic benefits
Mr Clark Rural Oppose Disturbed sleep
Pollution
Mr Skull Herne Bay Support Increase economy
Page
281
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
14/21
Title Surname AreaOverall view of
proposalsKey issues
Mrs Dawkins Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Mr Brearly Whitstable Support Growth in business
Mr Jones Herne Bay Oppose Only attacts low cost, noisy cargo planes
Mr Quarterman Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Mr Donnithorne Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Sleep disturbance
Quarterman Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbance
Quarterman Herne Bay Oppose
Lockwood Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbane
Not 1000 jobs created!!
Wildon Herne Bay Oppose Not uitlising all the daytime slots
Mr Upson Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbance
NoiseMrs Donnithorne Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Mr Lee Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Small economic benefits
Mr Wheatley Canterbury Oppose Increased noise levels
Economic benefit very small
Kitney Herne Bay Oppose Noise levels
Disturbed sleep
Mr Brocklehurst Herne Bay Oppose Noise levels
Sleep disturbance
Not enough jobs benig created
Mr Peakall Herne Bay Oppose Noise levels
Mr Rose Herne Bay Oppose Costs outweigh benefits
Failed to provide credible forecast for eceonomic benefits
Not enough people living in area to justfy passenger terminal
Page
282
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
15/21
Title Surname AreaOverall view of
proposalsKey issues
House prices will fall
Mr Hutt Whitstable Oppose No extra jobs
Smell fo fuel permanently
Mr Thompson Herne Bay Support Minimal noise
Mr Harris Herne Bay Oppose Lose sleep
Value of property decrease
Mr Davenport Whitstable Unclear
Mr Cronin-Hill Whitstable Support Good for economy
Hill
Mr Conabeer Herne Bay Oppose Noise
In favour of more daytime flights
Mr Betteridge Herne Bay Oppose No market for passenger travel
No substantial evidence for job/tourism increaseNoise pollution
Mr and Mrs Smith Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disruption
Noise
Myers Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Need to fill daytime slots first
Sleep deprivation
Quality of life
Doubt that 3000 jobs will be created
Airport in wrong place
Mr Merrywest Canterbury Support Extra number of flights are minimalMrs Wells Rural Support Needs jobs
Mrs Heath Whitstable Support Create more jobs
Edwards Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Mr Briant Herne Bay Oppose Overwhelming noise
Pa
ge
283
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
16/21
Title Surname AreaOverall view of
proposalsKey issues
Pollution
Reduction in house value
Cannot see that enough jobs are likely
Mr Padgham Whitstable Support has to be moderm, quiet planes
rather in bound than outbound
Mr Mills Canterbury Oppose Noise levels will increase
claims about essential viability and jobs are baseless.
Doyle Rural Oppose health dangers
Noise pollution
No justification of employment opportunities or well being
Mr Mitchell Herne Bay Oppose Quality of life
Noise
Mr Lockwood Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbancehealth impact
Devaluation of property
Environmental pollution
Safety
Mr Goggin Rural Support Improved air services
Need to encourage nationally based carriers
Parkway station at Manston
Mr and Mrs Moroney Whitstable Support Airport is under used currently
Hougham Herne Bay Support More employment
Ryan Herne Bay Oppose NoiseRendell Herne Bay Support Potential disturbance is small
Potential of new jobs
Good road links
Page
284
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
17/21
Title Surname AreaOverall view of
proposalsKey issues
Mr Davies Herne Bay Oppose Noise levels
Not persuaded by economic benefits
Mr and Mrs Fooks Herne Bay Support Creation of jobs
Mr Walkling Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbance
Not used enough during daytime
Mr Thompson Rural Support
Savage Herne Bay Oppose House vibrates
Noise levels
Mr and Mrs Butcher Herne Bay Oppose Noise levels
Detrimental to wellbeing
Location is severely restricted
Mr Bates Herne Bay Oppose Quality of life would decrease
Smith Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbanceMinimal new jobs created
Mrs Jackson Herne Bay Oppose
Mrs Hedges Herne Bay Oppose Hosue vibrates
Noise
Pollution
Mrs Palmer Herne Bay Oppose
Mr and Mrs Robinson Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbance
affect health
Ms McIntyre Herne Bay Oppose Sleep disturbance
Health implicationsNo credible evidence it will create many jobs
hasn't created a viable daytime business
Mr Bloodworth Herne Bay Oppose Impact on quality of life
Sleep disturbance
Pa
ge
285
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
18/21
Title Surname AreaOverall view of
proposalsKey issues
Mr and Mrs Algar Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Mr Brockhurst Herne Bay OpposeWill be excercising our rights under article 8 of the European Convention on Human
Rights.
Mr Lowe Rural Oppose Noise
Disturbed sleep
Climate change
Mr Eason Herne Bay Support More employment
O'Doherty Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Pollution
Kitney Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Disturbed sleep
Rodriguez-Diaz Rural Oppose Noise
Pollution
Mr and Mrs Mill Herne Bay Oppose Not enough economic benefits
Noise levels unnaceptable
Sleep disturbance
Mrs Joyce Herne Bay Oppose Noise
Sleep disturbance
Mr Cleveland Herne Bay Oppose
Mr Bell Canterbury Support Boost to economy
More jobs
Szymczak Rural Support Creat more jobs
Mr Cordell Herne Bay Oppose Intolerable noise levelsNonense about loads of jobs being created
Woods Herne Bay Oppose Interrupted sleep
Over estimated economic impact
Pollution
Page
286
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
19/21
Title Surname AreaOverall view of
proposalsKey issues
House prices will fall
Gurr family Cannot identify Support
Pa
ge
287
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
20/21
Letters
Title Surname AreaOverall view of
proposalsKey issues
Mrs Jolly Herne Bay Oppose Noise levels
Disturbed sleep, stress, health impacts
Accept daytime flights inevitable but not night flights
Negative impact on tourism if visitors cannot sleep due to night flights
Economy will not benefit
Mrs Forecast Herne Bay Oppose Noise concerns
Will council improve roof/wall insulation and double glazing to help eliminate noise?
Disturbed sleep and health problems
Mr Taylor Herne Bay Oppose Disturbed sleep and anxiety
Noise screaming/thundering
House vibratesMr Taylor Herne Bay Oppose Noise pollution
Disturbed sleep
Quality of life would be blighted
Air pollution
Smith Herne Bay Oppose No business case for allowing night flights
Ill health, pollution, reduced property values
Negatives outweigh positives
Smith Herne Bay Oppose Independent consultants' report demolishes business case
Should not trade wealth for health
Mr Cross Herne Bay Oppose Low flying aircraftNoise
Benefits overstated
Mrs Surgison Herne Bay Oppose Low flying aircraft
Noise
Page
288
-
8/2/2019 CCC Executive - Consultation Responses
21/21
Title Surname AreaOverall view of
proposalsKey issues
French Herne Bay Oppose Impacts on sleep, health and wellbeing
Speed Herne Bay Oppose Impacts on sleep, health and wellbeing
French Herne Bay Oppose Impacts on sleep, health and wellbeing
Baker Herne Bay Oppose Impacts on sleep, health and wellbeing
Jeer Rural Oppose Impacts on sleep, health and wellbeing
Bird Herne Bay Oppose Impacts on sleep, health and wellbeing
Monks Herne Bay Oppose Impacts on sleep, health and wellbeing
Gardner Whitstable Oppose Impacts on sleep, health and wellbeing
Pa
ge
289