ccampis 101. ccampis review 2013-2017 competition 50/50 split between 2 and 4 year colleges.total...

48
CCAMPIS 101

Upload: ophelia-warner

Post on 23-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Slide 1
  • CCAMPIS 101
  • Slide 2
  • CCAMPIS REVIEW 2013-2017 COMPETITION 50/50 split between 2 and 4 year colleges.Total Awards: 113 (58 New and 55 Non-Competition Continuations)Total Dollar Amount: $15,134,446 FY 2013 (113) Funded by State: CO 4 KY 1 NE 2 SC 1 FL 9 MA 1 NJ 1 TX 7 HI 1 MD 1 NM 1 UT 3 IA 2 MI 7 NY 9 VA 2 IL 3 MN 2 OH 2 WA 4 IN 3 MS 1 OK 1 WI 4 KS 2 MT 1 OR 4 WV 2 CO 4 NC 1 PA 4 SC 1
  • Slide 3
  • CCAMPIS PAST AWARDS FY2012 Total Awards: 153 (Non-Competing Continuation Awards) Total Dollar Amount: $15,969,760 FY 2011 Total Awards: 153 (Two Awards were relinquished to the Department by 2-year institutions) Total Dollar Amount: $16,001,932 FY 2010 Total Awards: 155 Total Dollar Amount: $16,034,000 FY 2009 Total Awards: 159 (104 New and 55 Non-Competition Continuations) Total Dollar Amount: $15,878,663 1999 $25 Million
  • Slide 4
  • THE OUTCOME PARTICIPANTS* 4 year2 year University of AlabamaPennsylvania Lehigh Cardon Community College Minnesota- Winona StateWisconsin Madison College (Technical) University of Wisconsin Madison Southern Utah University Wisconsin Lakeshore Technical College California State NorthridgeWashington State- Wenatchee Valley New York Medaille College Montana State University of Wisconsin -Milwaukee University of Wisconsin- Madison * 8% response rate for those awarded 2009-2013
  • Slide 5
  • WHAT WE LEARNED: (BASED ON DATA OCT 2009-SEPT 2012 Average amount provided per student across programs (3 fiscal years) $615.00 - $7150.00 over three years The program that gave $7000 also provided the most hours of child care (2334) Average hourly benefit to student ranges from $1. 86 to $3.19 per hour Average number of child care hours provided 319 hours 2334 over three years
  • Slide 6
  • WHAT WE LEARNED: Percent Graduated 9-51% total graduated in 3 year reporting period Percent Withdrawn 2-11% total withdrawn in 3 year reporting period Percent Persisting (served as least one term and did not graduate or withdraw 2009-2012) 42-87% total persisting over 3 year reporting period E.g. Madison College had highest persistent rate but lowest graduation rate National Averages: 2011 graduation rate (4 year institutions) of all full time undergraduates- 59% over 6 years 2 year degree granting institutions, rate falls to 31% for those graduating within 3 years. In both instances, graduation rate is higher for females by ~5%* (* source: National Center for Education Statistics: http://nces.ed.gov
  • Slide 7
  • DATA FROM 12 REPORTING COLLEGES/UNIVERSITIES
  • Slide 8
  • TOTALS FROM THESE 12 INSTITUTIONS TOTAL STUDENTS: 649 TOTAL GRADUATED: 207 TOTAL WITHDREW: 40 TOTAL PERSISTED/DIDNT GRADUATE OR WITHDRAW IN 3 REPORTING PERIODS: 402
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • QUESTIONS? DISCUSSION
  • Slide 14
  • COMMENTS FROM CCAMPIS STUDENTS Thanks to the support of CCAMPIS, we were able to meet our financial obligations while completing our degrees. We are both now employed as teachers and have made service and giving back a priority in our lives. I think [CCAMPIS] is a great investment. Before college I was living in public housing and receiving food stamps, medical assistance, free school lunch, etc. I now earn enough and receive no assistance. CCAMPIS was a sound investment. I picked up parenting skills from watching my son at school. We also made good use of the classes and resources available (music class, positive parenting workshop, family photo day). CCAMPIS funding allowed me to complete my undergrad degree and qualify for various grants and honors for my research. I am very grateful for the CCAMPIS funding, and I believe that the investment in myself, my family, and education was a soundI am a determined individual [who] has been faced with a lot of financial challenges throughout my odyssey to obtain a degree. I really appreciate the assistance that AIM was able to provide for my family and I. Without the grant I would not have been able to afford childcare and complete my last semester of my degree. I would have most likely been forced to go back to seasonal/physical labor at $16 an hour and would have been hit hard with student loans that I would not have been able to afford. The importance of this program cannot be overstated.
  • Slide 15
  • WRITING FOR CCAMPIS IN 2017 Watch for CCAMPIS grant overview sessions starting in 2016 and make sure you can attend. Start defining your program now and make contacts with: Research and Sponsored Programs Office Student Financial Aid Office, Veterans Student Services, and and other campus departments that track student parent data. If you use your grant writing department, ensure that EVERY requirement is included in your grant. and that all formatting is followed. DO not leave submission until the last day allow your self a week to deal with the on line submission. Find your campus editor, understand how they operate for use later.
  • Slide 16
  • GRANT OUTLINE Abstract A. Need for Project B. Quality of Project Design C. Quality of Management Plan D. Evaluation E. Adequacy of Resources F. Absolute and Competitive Preference Priorities Bibliography Budget Narrative
  • Slide 17
  • ABSOLUTE AND COMPETITIVE PRIORITIES Absolute Leveraging Sliding Scale Fees Competitive Support for military families Improving Productivity
  • Slide 18
  • KEY COMPONENTS FOR CCAMPIS Enrollment Persistence Graduation CCAMPIS focus is on these three components, versus service orientation for children. Initiate a national accreditation process if site(s) is not already accredited. Set up methods to track these components easily from the start it makes the annual report MUCH EASIER.
  • Slide 19
  • LEVERAGING student government? financial aid officer? campus foundation? School of Education? veterans services? sliding scale for services based on need EXAMPLES OF LEVERAGNG TO MEET GRANT EXPECTATIONS How did people improve efficiency?
  • Slide 20
  • BUDGET HELP Identify the gap in funding for student parents and use the greatest portion of grant to direct services to students CCAMPIS does not fund teacher positions CCAMPIS does not fund buildings or renovations that we not already there.
  • Slide 21
  • DATE:To: Representative Mark PocanFrom: Lynn Edlefson, Director, UW Office of Child Care and Family Resources Regarding: Child Care Access MeansParents in School (CCAMPIS) ProgramOn November 26, I was fortunate to meet you in your session at the Madison downtown library on women in the workforce. Thesession was compelling and important. You may remember that at that hearing, I informed you of the federally funded CCAMPIS grantthat UW Madison was fortunate to be awarded as of October 1, 2014 (summary attached). Our CCAMPIS program here at UW isreferred to as Access for Infants and Mothers (AIM).This CCAMPIS program is administered by the UW Department of Education. It was originally sponsored by Senators Olympia Snoweand Chris Dodd, both supporters of higher education to ensure that barriers to degree did not prevent degree completion. At UWMadison, weve been fortunate to have successfully secured this funding since 1999 and have successfully graduated hundreds ofstudent parent graduates into the workforce. The attached summary provides details on the program, our students, and our outcomes.I am writing today to ask that you consider being a sponsor of this program to increase the allocation from the present $15 millionallocation, which resulted in a mere 52 (out of 240 applicants) awards being granted this past October (in 1999, the allocation was$25 million). As a supporter of education, you are aware that higher education is one of the most significant factors in determining ones ability to support a family and meet the challenges and needs of our workforce. Thank you for your consideration. If I can provide additional information or clarification, please do not hesitate to contact me. ADVOCACY
  • Slide 22
  • CONCLUSIONS Based on the 12 reporting institutions, CCAMPIS students appear to exceed the national average in persistence. The average investment of the 12 institutions is a sum of $1,513,583 (8% overhead taken out) which comes out to an investment of $2,176 per student served 207 Graduates in 3 years reported From your perspective, is this a sound investment?
  • Slide 23
  • UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON CCAMPIS FOLLOW UP
  • Slide 24
  • POST-GRADUATE SUCCESS SURVEY
  • Slide 25
  • QUESTIONS ASKED FOR GRADUATE SUCCESS SURVEY Name Semester/Year of graduation Please indicate where you are in your education journey What is the highest level of education you have attained How many semesters did it take you to complete your degree at UW-Madison Were you able to obtain employment after graduation Are you currently employed If yes, describe what field you are in and what you do What other jobs have you held since graduation What is your annual income from your job(s) Is your annual income greater than that of one of your parents? Are you a first time college graduate in your family? Was the availability of child care a consideration in your decision to enroll at UW Madison? Would you have been able to graduate from UW-Madison without the AIM grant money towards child care? How important was the role of child care in your persistence and success at UW- Madison? How have you encouraged a mind set of attending college with your own child? Are you aware that the funding you received for child care (AIM) was granted to our office by the Department of Education through a competitive process? Do you feel that the investment in you, your family, and your education was a sound one? Why or why not? How would you rate the service/support/assistance provided to you by the Office of Child Care and Family Resources? How would you rate the quality of the child care services you received from your campus provider Would you care to provide any message or feedback to your campus provider?
  • Slide 26
  • GRADUATION OUTCOMES We surveyed UW-Madison graduates who obtained a BA or BS between 2007 and 2011 to learn how the AIM funding impacted their lives. Graduation: 100% surveyed completed their undergraduate degree; 82% are pursuing a graduate or professional degree. Employment/income: 82% obtained employment after graduation, 33% earn $30,000, and 50% earn $50,000 annually; 83% have incomes greater than their parents; 66% are first-time college graduates. Child care and persistence: 100% indicate the AIM funding was imperative to quality of care and their graduation/persistence; 100% felt child care eased the burden of child care costs and allowed them to study more and work (at a job) less; 83% said they benefitted from child care teachers support, especially noting feeling more equipped to handle parenting and school, and an increased ability to focus more in school; 100% of the respondents identified the services/support and assistance they received from the OCCFR as excellent. https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/8R7TB5VK
  • Slide 27
  • UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON CCAMPIS PROGRAM
  • Slide 28
  • PARENT REQUIREMENTS Full-time student UW-Madison student Applied for Financial Aid (FAFSA) and deemed Pell Eligible Using UW-Madison Campus Child Care Centers Attend one parent education session in Fall semester Complete ASQ (Ages and Stages Questionnaire) for youngest child in program in the Spring semester Maintain full-time status each semester Complete annual evaluation of their child care program and personal experience with the AIM grant (CCAMPIS) Student parents who graduate are required to complete a post- graduation survey on their enrollment, ability to persist in studies and employability outcomes with AIM support
  • Slide 29
  • STUDENT APPLICATION FOR CCAMPIS FUNDS Updated Spring 20125
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Slide 32
  • Slide 33
  • Slide 34
  • CCTAP APPLICATION (ONLINE)
  • Slide 35
  • Slide 36
  • Slide 37
  • * Leveraged student segregated fees to provide these services for CCAMPIS student parents
  • Slide 38
  • DATA TRACKING
  • Slide 39
  • Tracking CCAMPIS student parents within your college/university program Records all students served Provides additional data about the population served that you can use in your annual reports/new RFP Use features of Excel to sort/filter for you Development function
  • Slide 40
  • POSSIBLE EXCEL FIELDS TO INCLUDE DEMOGRAPHICS Cohort Year (year first began in CCAMPIS) Last Name, First Name, ID # Grad/Undergrad Degree Previous credits/Previous University (are your students transferring and who might be collaborators) Total student loans (update each academic year) Race/gender/marital status/pell grant status Are they or have they been in the military? Are they the first person in their family to attend college
  • Slide 41
  • Slide 42
  • POSSIBLE EXCEL FIELDS TO INCLUDE TRACKING ACADEMIC SUCCESS Year in School when first received CCAMPIS funds Current Student Status (this would get updated every year) Graduated? If so, how many years did it take them? Anticipated Graduation Date
  • Slide 43
  • POSSIBLE EXCEL FIELDS TO INCLUDE TRACKING OUTCOMES # of credits from start of CCAMPIS program Cumulative GPA Highest GPA earned while receiving CCAMPIS funds Difference in GPA from start of CCAMPIS
  • Slide 44
  • POSSIBLE EXCEL FIELDS TO INCLUDE Have one column per semester and total their CCAMPIS award each semester You can then total each semesters CCAMPIS total spent You can then filter out each semesters award recipients and enter them into your APR Be sure to include columns for the new monthly student fee and monthly CCAMPIS fee NOTE: IF A STUDENT DOES NOT RECEIVE CCAMPIS IN A GIVEN SEMESTER, ASSIGN AN APR CODE TO MAKE IT EASIER WHEN YOU FILL OUT YOUR APR
  • Slide 45
  • ANNUAL REPORT (EXCEL) CCAMPIS
  • Slide 46
  • NEW THIS YEAR
  • Slide 47
  • QUESTIONS? DISCUSSION
  • Slide 48
  • Lynn Edlefson [email protected] Jen Dittrich-Templin [email protected] Thank you!