cbr 102 ethical issues in community-based research
DESCRIPTION
CBR 102 Ethical Issues in Community-Based Research. INTRODUCTION. Who works for a CBO? An academic institution? Is a student? Who has gone through an ethical review before? Who has written an ethics protocol? Who works with “vulnerable groups”? Who has obtained “consent” before?. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
CBR 102CBR 102Ethical Issues in Community-Ethical Issues in Community-
Based Research Based Research
2
INTRODUCTION
Who works for a CBO? An academic institution? Is a student?
Who has gone through an ethical review before?
Who has written an ethics protocol?
Who works with “vulnerable groups”?
Who has obtained “consent” before?
3
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Upon completion of this workshop you will be able to:
• Understand the importance of research ethics and “informed consent”
• List the fundamental elements of ethical principles
• Identify and prevent potential ethical issues in CBR
• Problem solve different ethical issues commonly presented in CBR
• Apply the Ethic Review Protocol Using Guiding Questions
• Describe the ethics review process
5
AGENDA
• Define and establish need for ‘research ethics’; • Ethics Principles• Identify potential ethical issues in CBR & your
project
LUNCH
• Workshop Scenarios• Ethics Review Process • Ethics Review Protocol & Helpful Guiding Questions• Workshop Evaluation
EXERCISE 1 – Defining Research Ethics
1. In your small groups, discuss what is meant by the term ‘research ethics’.
2. Then, create your own definition of research ethics to share with the large group.
6
7
TRI-COUNCIL DEFINITION...
Morally acceptable ‘ends’Morally acceptable means to those ‘ends’
Translation:Translation:
You need a good reason to do research, and while you are doing it – you need to be ethical... So you can’t use the excuse that ‘the ends justify the means’
8
HISTORIAL OVERVIEW
Tuskegee Syphilis Study – 1932
Nazi eugenics, racial hygiene, and experimentation
– 1934
9
PROTECTING ‘HUMAN SUBJECTS’
Nuremberg Code – 1949
World Medical Association, Declaration of Helsinki 1964
Tri-Council of Canada – 1970s
10
ETHICAL PRINCIPLES: Tri-Council 2005
1. Respect for human dignity2. Respect for free and informed consent3. Respect for vulnerable persons4. Respect for privacy and confidentiality5. Respect for justice and inclusiveness6. Balancing harms and benefits7. Minimizing harms8. Maximizing benefits
11
EXERCISE 2: Protecting Human Rights
Despite all of these ‘safeguards’ – we still see unethical research happen!
In pairs, create a list of problems thatcan occur when unethical research takes place.
12
COMMON PROBLEMS IN RESEARCH
• Communities feel coerced
• Communities are lied to
• Communities feel over researched
• Insensitivity to community concerns or issues
• Benefits to community are minimal
• Irrelevance to community
• Poor methodology (waste of resources)
13
EXERCISE 3: Identifying Potential Ethical Issues
1. In small groups, describe what your assigned stage looks like in the project.
2. Next, identify some of the ethical issues that are likely to occur at this stage.
3. What safeguards could be put into place?
Research Project Goal: Identify support needs of non-status youth who have experienced domestic violence.
EXERCISE 4: Identifying Solutions to Ethical Issues
Each group will be assigned an ethics scenario (found in your student handout).
With your group, discuss the ethical issues involved with your scenario.
Then, discuss how the ethical issues could be handled.
Be prepared to share your ideas with the group.14
15
ETHICAL REVIEW PROCESS
1. Ensures that you consider ethical issues upfront
2. Provides ample opportunity for your research team to flesh out issues
3. Forces you to put down on paper how you will handle potential mine-fields
4. Allows you to dialogue and problem solve before problems actually happen
5. Ensures that other ‘objective’ eyes will review your processes
Ethical review is a requirement of almost all
funders…so how does this work?
You write a protocol & submit it to a Review
Board
PREPARING FOR AN ETHICAL REVIEW
17
ETHICAL REVIEW BOARDS
Located in hospitals and universities.
Composed of: Researchers Ethicists Community members Privacy officer
EXERCISE 5: EVALUATING AN ETHICS REVIEW PROTOCOL
Review the sample ethics review protocol by yourself.
When you have finished, in your same small groups, discuss the protocol section by section.
Answer the guiding questions for each section.
Be prepared to report back the extent to which the sample protocol answers the guiding questions.
18
EXERCISE 6: Learning into Practice
1. Working in pairs, create a project relevant to yourselves or your organizations (or feel free to use a project you are currently working on).
2. Work through an Ethics Review Protocol for this project.
3. Be prepared to discuss your results with the class!
19
20
TIPS FOR A SUCCESSFUL REVIEW
1. Start thinking about Ethics from day one. Identify ethical red flags throughout the design, and
talk them through with your research partners. Do not leave your application until the last minute.
2. Assume the REB members know nothing. Unanswered questions will have to be addressed
during a second round. Justify and explain your choices (append when
needed). Be specific, even when you need to remain flexible. Recognise your expertise, acknowledge your
limitations.
Review REB protocol guidelines and ask for guidance when needed!
21
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Upon completion of this workshop you will be able to:
• Understand the importance of research ethics and “informed consent”
• List the fundamental elements of ethical principles
• Identify and prevent potential ethical issues in CBR
• Problem solve different ethical issues commonly presented in CBR
• Apply the Ethic Review Protocol Using Guiding Questions
• Describe the ethics review process
22
WORKSHOP EVALUATION
Your feedback is important.
Please complete the workshop evaluation.
Thank you.