caviar : conditional value at risk by regression quantiles robert engle and simone manganelli...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
227 views
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
CAViaR :Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles
Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli
U.C.S.D.July 1999
![Page 2: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Value at Risk is a single measure of market risk of a firm, portfolio, trading desk, or other economic entity.
It is defined by a significance level and a horizon. For convenience consider 5% and 1 day.
Any loss tomorrow will be less than the Value at Risk with 95% certainty
![Page 3: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
HISTOGRAM OF TOMORROW’S VALUE - BASED ON PAST RETURNS
0 . 0
0 . 2
0 . 4
0 . 6
0 . 8
- 2 0 - 1 5 - 1 0 - 5 0 5
S & P 5 0 0 % R E T U R N S
K e r n e l D e n s i t y ( N o r m a l , h = 0 . 1 1 4 5 )
![Page 4: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
-20 -10 0 10
Empirical CDF of S&P500 RETURNS
![Page 5: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Weakness of this measure
• The amount we exceed VaR is important
• There is no utility function associated with this measure
• The measure assumes assets can be sold at their market price - no consideration for liquidity
• But it is simple to understand and very widely used.
![Page 6: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
THE PROBLEM
• FORECAST QUANTILE OF FUTURE RETURNS
• MUST ACCOMMODATE TIME VARYING DISTRIBUTIONS
• MUST HAVE METHOD FOR EVALUATION
• MUST HAVE METHOD FOR PICKING UNKNOWN PARAMETERS
![Page 7: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
TWO GENERAL APPROACHES• FACTOR MODELS--- AS IN
RISKMETRICS
• PORTFOLIO MODELS--- AS IN ROLLING HISTORICAL QUANTILES
![Page 8: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
FACTOR MODELS
– Volatilities and correlations between factors are estimated
– These volatilities and correlations are updated daily
– Portfolio standard deviations are calculated from portfolio weights and covariance matrix
– Value at Risk computed assuming normality
![Page 9: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
PORTFOLIO MODELS
• Historical performance of fixed weight portfolio is calculated from data bank
• Model for quantile is estimated
• VaR is forecast
![Page 10: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
COMPLICATIONS
• Some assets didn’t trade in the past- approximate by deltas or betas
• Some assets were traded at different times of the day - asynchronous prices-synchronize these
• Derivatives may require special assumptions - volatility models and greeks.
![Page 11: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
PORTFOLIO MODELS - EXAMPLES• Rolling Historical : e.g. find the 5%
point of the last 250 days• GARCH : e.g. build a GARCH model to
forecast volatility and use standardized residuals to find 5% point
• Hybrid model: use rolling historical but weight most recent data more heavily with exponentially declining weights.
![Page 12: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
THE CAViaR STRATEGY
• Define a quantile model with some unknown parameters
• Construct the quantile criterion function• Optimize this criterion over the
historical period• Formulate diagnostic checks for model
adequacy• Try it out!
![Page 13: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Mathematical Formulation
Find VaR satisfying
where y are returns and is probability
Must be able to calculate VaR one day in advance and to estimate unknown parameters.
)(
1ttVaRyP
![Page 14: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
SPECIFICATIONS FOR VaR
• VaR is a function of observables in t-1
• VaR=f(VaR(t-1), y(t-1), parameters)
• For example - the Adaptive Model
)(
)(11
ttt
ttt
VaRyIhit
hitVaRVaR
![Page 15: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
How to compute VaR
If beta is known, then VaR can be calculated for the adaptive model from a starting value.
.....)3(
hit no if (-.05)*
1in hit if .95*VaR(1)VaR(2)
1.65VaR(1)Let
VaR
![Page 16: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
CAViaR News Impact Curve
![Page 17: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
More Specifications
• Proportional Symmetric Adaptive
• Symmetric Absolute Value:
• Asymmetric Absolute Value:
)VaRy()VaRy(VaRVaR 1t1t21t1t11tt
1t21t101t yVaRVaR
31t21t101t yVaRVaR
![Page 18: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
• Asymmetric Slope
• Indirect GARCH
1t31t21t10t yyVaRVaR
2/12
1t2
21t
10t yk
VaRkVaR
![Page 19: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
![Page 20: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Koenker and Bassett(1978) maximize
Where f is the quantile which depends on past information and parameters beta
The criterion minimizes absolute errors where positive and negative errors are weighted differently
)()(
210)()(
ttt
ttt
fyhit
fyIfyQ
![Page 21: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Quantile Objective Function
![Page 22: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Even though the quantile function is non-differentiable at some points, the first order conditions must be satisfied with probability one.
Hits should be unpredictable and are uncorrelated with regressors at an optimum
0'
/)(
0/)ˆ(
Xhit
fX
fhit
tt
tt
![Page 23: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Adaptive Criterion
-0.118
-0.116
-0.114
-0.112
-0.110
-0.108
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Quantile Criterion - Adaptive
![Page 24: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Asymmetric Criterion
-0.17
-0.16
-0.15
-0.14
-0.13
-0.12
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Likelihood from CAViaR1
![Page 25: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Optimization by Genetic Algorithm• DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTIONARY GENETIC
ALGORITHM - Price and Storn(1997)
• Start with initial population of trial values
• Reproduction based on fitness
• Crossover to find next generation
• Mutation - random new elements
• Stopping Criterion
![Page 26: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Testing the Model
• Should have the right proportion of hits
• Should have no autocorrelation
• Probability of exceeding VaR should be independent of VaR (no measurement error)
• Should be testable both in-sample and out-of-sample
![Page 27: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
![Page 28: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Tests
• Cowles and Jones (1937)
• Runs - Mood (1940)
• Ljung Box on hits (1979)
• Dynamic Quantile Test
![Page 29: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Dynamic Quantile Test
To test that hits have the same distribution regardless of past observables
Regress hit on– constant– lagged hits– Value at Risk– lagged returns– other variables such as year dummies
![Page 30: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Distribution Theory
• If out of sample test , or
• If all parameters are known
• Then TR02 will be asymptotically
Chi Squared and F version is also available
• But the distribution is slightly different otherwise
![Page 31: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Mathematical Statistics References• Koenker and Bassett(1978) no
dynamics
• Weiss(1991) least absolute deviation
• Newey and McFadden(1994)
![Page 32: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Mathematical Statistics
)(maxarg
)(maxargˆ
0)r( to
Q
nQ
fyfyIn
Q
subject
tttt
hitXDRRADRDRXDhitn
ADDNn
Then
LM
d
''''
)1(,0ˆ
111111
110
![Page 33: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Mathematical Assumptions
0n1/ and ,
2/Q )8(
matrixsingular -non a ,/' )7(
),0()(n )6(
ofdensity theish where,'n
1 )5(
of odneighborho ain singular non , )4(
oney probabilit with ),()(1
Q )3(
)( )2(
at maximizeduniquely is ,)( )1(
0
0000
0
0
02
00
p
p
d
ptt
tt
p
remainderremainder
DQQ
AnXX
ANQ
(y-f)DXXh
DQE
Xhitn
Rr
QQE
![Page 34: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Estimating Standard Errors
ofdensity lconditiona theis where
,'n1
0
-fy h
DXXh
ttt
pttt
• To calculate standard errors-must estimate D• D weights X by the height of the conditional
density of returns at the estimated quantile• Should estimate this without making assumptions
on the shape of the density
![Page 35: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
A Picture Gives Intuition
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
200 400 600 800 1000
Y1 Y2
STANDARD DEVIATION OF Y1 IS TWICE Y2BOTH ARE GAUSSIAN
![Page 36: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
200 400 600 800 1000
Y1Y2
Q1_1/10Q2_1/10
1% QUANTILE POINTS
![Page 37: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400
Y1Y2
Q1_1/10Q2_1/10
1% QUANTILE POINTS
![Page 38: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440
Y1Y2
Q1_5/5Q2_5/5
5% QUANTILE
![Page 39: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
200 400 600 800 1000
Y1Y2/2
Q1_5/10Q2_5/10
Density of Y2 divided by its standard deviation
![Page 40: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Assumption
• Define
• Therefore• And• NOW ASSUME:
tt
ttt g
f
fy~
ttt fhg
ttt fgh /)0()0(
.f hborhood ofor a Neigfor all t ugugt 0)()(
![Page 41: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
Estimate g Non-parametrically:
• where k is a uniform kernel accepting points between -1 and 1
• and for 2900 observations empirically we chose cn=.05
tt fgh ˆ/)0(ˆ)0(ˆ
ntn ckncg /0ˆ 1
![Page 42: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
![Page 43: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
A little Monte Carlo
• 100 samples of 2000 observations of GARCH(1,1) with parameters (.3, .05, .90)
• Estimate with Indirect GARCH CAViaR model
• Mean parameters are (.42, .05, .88)
• Some are far off showing no persistence
• Trimming 10 extremes, means become (.31,.05,.90 )
![Page 44: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
Table 1 - Summary statistics of the Monte Carlo experiment
0.1% GAMMA1 GAMMA2 GAMMA3
True mean 4.15 0.90 0.69
Mean 7.16 0.80 0.67
t-statistic 8.54 -13.60 -0.95
Median 2.90 0.89 0.53
125.16 -2.45 2.60
Var-Cov matrix -2.45 0.05 -0.07
2.60 -0.07 0.32
1% GAMMA1 GAMMA2 GAMMA3
True mean 1.62 0.90 0.27
Mean 2.28 0.87 0.30
t-statistic 7.59 -7.91 6.01
Median 1.57 0.90 0.27
7.79 -0.28 0.19
Var-Cov matrix -0.28 0.01 -0.01
0.19 -0.01 0.02
![Page 45: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
5% GAMMA1 GAMMA2 GAMMA3True mean 0.81 0.90 0.135
Trimmed Mean 0.99 0.89 0.14Trimmed Median 0.81 0.90 0.14
0.49 -0.04 0.02Trimmed Var-Cov matrix -0.04 0.00 0.00
0.02 0.00 0.00
25% GAMMA1 GAMMA2 GAMMA3True mean 0.13 0.90 0.027
Trimmed Mean 0.18 0.88 0.03Trimmed Median 0.13 0.90 0.02
0.03 -0.01 0.00Trimmed Var-Cov matrix -0.01 0.01 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
![Page 46: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
Table 2 - Monte Carlo summary statistics after trimming the samples with GAMMA2<0.5
0.1% GAMMA1 GAMMA2 GAMMA3True mean 4.15 0.90 0.69
Trimmed Mean 4.04 0.87 0.60Trimmed Median 2.49 0.90 0.50
18.36 -0.40 0.81Trimmed Var-Cov matrix -0.40 0.01 -0.03
0.81 -0.03 0.23
1% GAMMA1 GAMMA2 GAMMA3True mean 1.62 0.90 0.27
Trimmed Mean 2.02 0.88 0.29Trimmed Median 1.55 0.90 0.27
2.72 -0.11 0.12Trimmed Var-Cov matrix -0.11 0.00 -0.01
0.12 -0.01 0.02
![Page 47: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
Applications
• Daily data from April 7, 1986 to April 7, 1999 - 3392 observations
• Save the last 500 for out- of- sample tests
• GM, IBM, S&P500
• Fit all 6 models for 5% ,1% , .1% and 25% VaR.
![Page 48: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
GM
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
IBM
-30
-20
-10
0
10
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
S&P500
![Page 49: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49
News Impact Curve - 1% SP
2
4
6
8
10
12
200 400 600 800 1000
VAR_ADAPTIVEVAR_ASY_ABSVAR_ASY_SLOP
VAR_IND_GARCHVAR_PRO_SYM_ADAVAR_SYM_ABS
![Page 50: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
50
Caviar News Impact Curves SP500 at 5%
0
1
2
3
4
5
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
A
0
1
2
3
4
5
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
PSA
0
1
2
3
4
5
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
SAV
0
1
2
3
4
5
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
AAV
0
1
2
3
4
5
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
AS
0
1
2
3
4
5
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
G
![Page 51: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
51
1% and 5% News Impact Curves
1
2
3
4
5
200 400 600 800 1000
VAR_AS_5 VAR_ASY_SLOP
![Page 52: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
52
Table 3 - Parameter estimates -Statistics for the Adaptive model
ADAPTIVE *** 5% GM IBM S&P 500 ADAPTIVE *** 25% GM IBM S&P 500Gamma 1 0.22 0.44 0.23 Gamma 1 0.021 0.012 0.017Standard Errors 0.03 0.05 0.02 Standard Errors 0.004 0.003 0.003P-values 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-values 0.000 0.000 0.000RQ in sample 553.26 527.45 312.65 RQ in sample 1507 1368 752RQ out of sample 100.84 120.20 72.41 RQ out of sample 291.62 312.44 184Hits in sample (%) 4.91 5.01 5.08 Hits in sample (%) 24.86 25.31 25.07Hits out of sample (%) 6.40 5.20 5.00 Hits out of sample (%) 27.00 24.80 27.40DQ in sample (p-values) DQ in sample (p-values)1) [c, hit(-1 to -5)] 0.31 0.47 0.46 1) [c, hit(-1 to -5)] 0.94 0.25 0.592) [VaR] 0.52 0.34 0.48 2) [VaR] 0.73 0.80 0.683) [c, hit(-1), VaR] 0.12 0.01 0.10 3) [c, hit(-1), VaR] 0.58 0.64 0.304) [c, hit(-1 to -5), VaR] 0.06 0.01 0.07 4) [c, hit(-1 to -5), VaR] 0.81 0.23 0.32DQ out of sample (p-values) DQ out of sample (p-values)1) [c, hit(-1 to -5)] 0.40 0.98 0.01 1) [c, hit(-1 to -5)] 0.57 0.67 0.452) [VaR] 0.26 0.90 0.80 2) [VaR] 0.43 0.97 0.293) [c, hit(-1), VaR] 0.40 0.21 0.55 3) [c, hit(-1), VaR] 0.23 0.28 0.394) [c, hit(-1 to -5), VaR] 0.45 0.56 0.01 4) [c, hit(-1 to -5), VaR] 0.64 0.30 0.41
![Page 53: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
53
ASYM SLOPE *** 0.1% GM IBM S&P 500 ASYM SLOPE *** 1% GM IBM S&P 500Gamma 1 2.7753 1.0863 0.4325 Gamma 1 0.3928 0.0572 0.1473Standard Errors - - - Standard Errors 0.2216 0.0580 0.0833P-values - - - P-values 0.0381 0.1623 0.0385
Gamma 2 0.4342 0.6587 0.6871 Gamma 2 0.7983 0.9427 0.8699Standard Errors - - - Standard Errors 0.0676 0.0227 0.0484P-values - - - P-values 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Gamma 3 0.6130 1.1402 1.8655 Gamma 3 0.2725 0.0512 0.0001Standard Errors - - - Standard Errors 0.1148 0.0616 0.1168P-values - - - P-values 0.0088 0.2029 0.4997
Gamma 4 2.0416 2.8743 2.2849 Gamma 4 0.4437 0.2474 0.5045Standard Errors - - - Standard Errors 0.1589 0.1006 0.2403P-values - - - P-values 0.0026 0.0070 0.0179
RQ in sample 25.01 29.27 18.15 RQ in sample 169.30 179.54 105.84RQ out of sample 4.15 5.93 3.65 RQ out of sample 28.48 40.54 22.69
Hits in sample (%) 0.10 0.10 0.14 Hits in sample (%) 1.00 0.97 0.97Hits out of sample (%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hits out of sample (%) 1.40 1.60 1.60
DQ in sample (p-values) DQ in sample (p-values)1) [c, hit(-1 to -5)] - - - 1) [c, hit(-1 to -5)] 0.60 0.81 0.562) [VaR] - - - 2) [VaR] 0.98 0.89 0.963) [c, hit(-1), VaR] - - - 3) [c, hit(-1), VaR] 0.96 0.96 0.944) [c, hit(-1 to -5), VaR] - - - 4) [c, hit(-1 to -5), VaR] 0.71 0.88 0.68
DQ out of sample (p-values) DQ out of sample (p-values)1) [c, hit(-1 to -5)] - - - 1) [c, hit(-1 to -5)] 0.96 0.05 0.052) [VaR] - - - 2) [VaR] 0.46 0.21 0.133) [c, hit(-1), VaR] - - - 3) [c, hit(-1), VaR] 0.67 0.53 0.454) [c, hit(-1 to -5), VaR] - - - 4) [c, hit(-1 to -5), VaR] 0.97 0.07 0.07
LM test for VaR(t-2) - - - LM test for VaR(t-2) 0.92 0.92 0.96
![Page 54: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
54
ASYM SLOPE *** 5% GM IBM S&P 500 ASYM SLOPE *** 25% GM IBM S&P 500Gamma 1 0.0704 0.0951 0.0410 Gamma 1 0.0404 0.0125 0.0014Standard Errors 0.0425 0.0444 0.0221 Standard Errors 0.0298 0.0104 0.0047P-values 0.0488 0.0161 0.0316 P-values 0.0877 0.1151 0.3820
Gamma 2 0.9353 0.8916 0.9026 Gamma 2 0.9132 0.9605 0.9481Standard Errors 0.0222 0.0272 0.0239 Standard Errors 0.0393 0.0169 0.0212P-values 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 P-values 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Gamma 3 0.0411 0.0597 0.0307 Gamma 3 0.0415 0.0108 0.0288Standard Errors 0.0285 0.0335 0.0469 Standard Errors 0.0193 0.0098 0.0192P-values 0.0745 0.0372 0.2565 P-values 0.0157 0.1349 0.0664
Gamma 4 0.1182 0.2110 0.2841 Gamma 4 0.0290 0.0297 0.0288Standard Errors 0.0399 0.0558 0.0895 Standard Errors 0.0170 0.0127 0.0175P-values 0.0015 0.0001 0.0008 P-values 0.0441 0.0097 0.0502
RQ in sample 548.63 515.72 300.76 RQ in sample 1500.88 1360.53 746.90RQ out of sample 99.20 121.05 72.05 RQ out of sample 289.41 311.51 183.48
Hits in sample (%) 4.98 4.91 4.98 Hits in sample (%) 25.00 25.14 24.93Hits out of sample (%) 5.20 7.40 6.80 Hits out of sample (%) 25.60 23.40 25.80
DQ in sample (p-values) DQ in sample (p-values)1) [c, hit(-1 to -5)] 0.83 0.74 0.69 1) [c, hit(-1 to -5)] 0.69 0.83 0.492) [VaR] 0.98 0.87 0.94 2) [VaR] 0.97 0.85 0.933) [c, hit(-1), VaR] 0.97 0.97 0.64 3) [c, hit(-1), VaR] 0.97 0.90 0.994) [c, hit(-1 to -5), VaR] 0.89 0.82 0.74 4) [c, hit(-1 to -5), VaR] 0.79 0.90 0.60
DQ out of sample (p-values) DQ out of sample (p-values)1) [c, hit(-1 to -5)] 0.92 0.03 0.00 1) [c, hit(-1 to -5)] 0.88 0.64 0.292) [VaR] 0.97 0.06 0.20 2) [VaR] 0.88 0.45 0.773) [c, hit(-1), VaR] 0.96 0.00 0.13 3) [c, hit(-1), VaR] 0.67 0.79 0.674) [c, hit(-1 to -5), VaR] 0.95 0.01 0.00 4) [c, hit(-1 to -5), VaR] 0.94 0.70 0.32
LM test for VaR(t-2) 0.96 0.77 0.94 LM test for VaR(t-2) 0.99 0.89 0.60
![Page 55: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
55
Value at Risk for GM
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
A_VAR
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
AAV_VAR
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
AS_VAR
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
G_VAR
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
PSA_VAR
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
SAV_VAR
![Page 56: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
56
Value at Risk for SP
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
A_VAR
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
AAV_VAR
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
AS_VAR
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
G_VAR
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
PSA_VAR
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
SAV_VAR
![Page 57: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
57
![Page 58: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
58
Dynamic Quantile Test -SPDependent Variable: SAV_HITSample: 5 2892Included observations: 2888Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 0.0051 0.0096 0.5277 0.5977SAV_HIT(-1) 0.0397 0.0187 2.1277 0.0334SAV_HIT(-2) 0.0244 0.0187 1.3051 0.1920SAV_HIT(-3) 0.0252 0.0187 1.3468 0.1781SAV_HIT(-4) -0.0044 0.0187 -0.2370 0.8127SAV_VAR -0.0034 0.0066 -0.5241 0.6002
R-squared 0.0029 Mean dependent var 0.0006Adjusted R-squared 0.0012 S.D. dependent var 0.2191S.E. of regression 0.2190 Akaike info criterion -0.1975Sum squared resid 138.2105 Schwarz criterion -0.1851Log likelihood 291.2040 F-statistic 1.7043Durbin-Watson stat 1.9999 Prob(F-statistic) 0.1301
![Page 59: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
59
In-sample Dynamic Quantile Test
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
1
A_OUT
AAV_
OUT
AS_OUT
G_OUT
PSA_
OUT
SAV_
OUT
GMIBMSP500
![Page 60: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
60
In-sample 1% Dynamic Quantile Test
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
A_OUT
AAV_
OUT
AS_OUT
G_OUT
PSA_
OUT
SAV_
OUT
GMIBMSP500
![Page 61: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
61
Out of Sample DQ Test
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
1
A_OUT
AAV_
OUT
AS_OUT
G_OUT
PSA_
OUT
SAV_
OUT
GMIBMSP500
![Page 62: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
62
Out of Sample 1% DQ Test
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
1
A_OUT
AAV_
OUT
AS_OUT
G_OUT
PSA_
OUT
SAV_
OUT
GMIBMSP500
![Page 63: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
63
TRADITIONAL GARCH(1,1) : IBM
C 0.133384 0.016911
ARCH(1) 0.112194 0.005075
GARCH(1) 0.851960 0.009923
VaR=1.65*standard deviation
![Page 64: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
64
DQ TESTS FOR NORMAL GARCH
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
IN-SAMPLE IN - TEST2 OUT OUT-TEST2
GMIBMSP500
![Page 65: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
65
TRADITIONAL GARCH(1,1) : IBM
C 0.133384 0.016911ARCH(1) 0.112194 0.005075GARCH(1) 0.851960 0.009923
5% POINT OF STANDARDIZED RESIDUALS = 1.48
FOR GM THIS POINT IS 1.56FOR S&P THIS POINT IS 1.64
![Page 66: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
66
DQ TESTS FOR TRADITIONAL GARCH
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
1
IN-SAMPLE IN - TEST2 OUT OUT-TEST2
GMIBMSP500
![Page 67: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
67
Value at Risk for GM Asymmetric
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
GM -AS_VAR
![Page 68: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
68
Value at Risk for IBM Adaptive
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
IBM -A_VAR
![Page 69: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
69
Value at Risk for SP Implicit GARCH
-30
-20
-10
0
10
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
SP500 -G_VAR
![Page 70: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
70
Some Extensions
• Are there economic variables which can predict tail shapes?
• Would option market variables have predictability for the tails?
• Would variables such as credit spreads prove predictive?
• Can we estimate the expected value of the tail?
![Page 71: CAViaR : Conditional Value at Risk By Regression Quantiles Robert Engle and Simone Manganelli U.C.S.D. July 1999](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d4c5503460f94a29ecd/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
71
CONCLUSIONS-Contributions?• Estimation strategy for VaR Models• New Dynamic Specifications of Quantiles• Estimation of VaR without estimating
volatility• Test for VaR accuracy both in and out of
sample• Promising empirical evidence on some
specifications