catherine brys ([email protected]) morag greig ([email protected])
DESCRIPTION
Improving the usability of a University Library web site: user research, analysis, design and usability testing. Catherine Brys ([email protected]) Morag Greig ([email protected]) University of Glasgow. Project background & aims. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Improving the usability of a University Library web site: user research, analysis, design and usability testing
Catherine Brys ([email protected])
Morag Greig ([email protected])
University of Glasgow
Project background & aims
• Glasgow University Library web site & third-party catalogue web application
• Improve usability & accessibility
• Re-design organisation-centered web site into user-centered (task-centered) site
Before re-design: 2 ‘home’ pages
before
Methodology
Four pillars: user types, user tasks, content & current problems
User & stakeholder investigation
• Library staff interviews• Training sessions for students by
Library staff• User Quickpolls: problems, tasks• Web User Panel: problems• User Observation sessions:
problems in context
Analysis: main problems
• Often used items not prominent• Library item searches confusing• Information hard to find (users & Lib
staff)• Grouping and labels (acronyms,
jargon, organisation-centered site)• Presentation: unattractive, cluttered
• Interviews, training sessions• Tasks Quickpoll: open question -
quantitative data• 25 recurring tasks• 50% 'search for an item'
50% of items = books
Analysis: tasks
Task-centered home page & forms to search by item type
...
Design: wireframes
• User tasks• Home page items• Web conventions• Frequency of use per task
By Many easy to find
By Fewmore hidden
Frequentfew clicks
Easy to find and few clicks
More hidden but few clicks
Occasionalmore clicks
Easy to find but more clicks
More hidden & more clicks
Design: wireframes
Three designs
• Three different information layouts• Three different colour schemes• Implemented using fully accessible
templates• Consultation of Library staff: choice!
Three designs
3 designs
Staff and User Panel feedback
Library staff: feedback on 3 designs info layout 1 preferred
User Panel: feedback on design 1: • Too much info• Colours
Work with graphic designer:• Colour scheme• Column layout
..
Modified design home page
modified
Search forms for Library items
books, journals, etc.
Discount usability testing
• Aim: test home page & search forms (book, journal, etc.)
• Budget max £500• Pre-defined tasks• Criteria for selection participants –
correlation • Round 1: 6 users; round 2: 5 users;
round 3: disabled users• 'Dummy' links to try out ideas
Discount usability testing: set-up
Meeting room, 2 observers, projector
observer
observer
participant
Results of usability testing (1)
• Information Architecture & design effective
• Labels and grouping clear – few added/changed
• Search for books, journals, etc.: new search forms effective – frequent tasks for many users
Results of usability testing (2)
• Underlying issues identified: • How to research a topic• Understanding a journal article
reference• 'Google effect'
• Some undergraduates very impatient – don’t read labels on forms, just dive in
.
Final design
Content added to address underlying issues
'Can wehelp?'
'Ten seconds top tips'
'UG/PG support'
'after'
Challenges
• Consultation culture• Library had no previous usability
projects• Limited budget & resources• Academic year cycle• Involvement disabled students• Philosophy about student
learning?
Lessons learned
• Quickpolls & User Panel effective (research, first cut)
• User research powerful in getting Library staff buy-in
• Using high-fidelity prototypes & trying out ideas effective
• Involving colleagues in usability testing: awareness; advocacy