cashpor apr 2002

Upload: ashishsameer

Post on 30-May-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    1/37

    CASHPOR FINANCIAL AND TECHNICAL

    SERVICES LIMITED

    MICROFINANCE EVALUATION REPORT

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    2/37

    MICROFINANCE EVALUATION

    A Microfinance Evaluation is CRISILs current opinion on the ability of the micro

    finance institution to conduct operations in a scalable and sustainable manner.

    The microfinance evaluates theperformance of the MFI on a broad range of parameters

    under the MICROS methodology. It includes the traditional creditworthiness analysis

    using the CRAMEL approach, modified as applicable to the MFI sector. MICROS standsforManagement, Institutional arrangement, Capital adequacy & asset quality, Resources,

    Operational effectiveness and Scalability & sustainability.

    Validity: This evaluation is valid for the current capital structure of the company. If this

    capital structure were to change or there were to be any other significant change in thecompany or the external environment, CRISIL would recommend a review whenever

    such changes take place or at the end of one year, whichever is earlier.

    2

    CASHPOR FINANCIAL AND TECHNICAL

    SERVICES LIMITED

    Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, INDIAValidity: April 30, 2003

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    3/37

    ABOUT CRISIL

    3

    Indias premier credit rating agency, CRISIL was established in

    1987. A pioneer of credit rating in India, CRISIL has been

    instrumental in developing the framework and methodology for

    rating debt in the context of the Indian financial and regulatorysystem.

    Along the way, it has added many firsts to its credit. CRISIL was thefirst credit rating agency to undertake ratings for entities such as

    banks, financial institutions, utilities, municipal bodies, insurancecompanies and green-field projects as well as for new instrumentssuch as asset and mortgage backed securities and other structured

    obligations.

    CRISIL has an equity and strategic alliance partnership with

    Standard & Poors, the world largest rating agency.

    CRISILs ability to understand the risk elements in any new specialized field and segregate

    the population into clearly discernible clusters has been the hallmark of all its products.

    The company has a reputed board that comprises eminent professionals from various fields

    of business. CRISIL employs over 350 professional analysts and has developed expertise aswell as extensive databases on various industries. Given this resource base, CRISIL features

    among the top four rating agencies in the world in terms of both its coverage and analytical

    strength.

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    4/37

    ACRONYMS

    AGM Acting General ManagerAIM Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia

    ALM Asset Liability Management

    CEO Chief Executive Officer

    CFTS Cashpor Financial and Technical Services Limited

    CGAP The Consultative Group to Assist the Poorest

    CRISIL The Credit Rating Information Services of India Limited

    CSR Customer Services Representative

    CTS Cashpor Technical Services Sdn BHD, Malaysia

    DFSM Deputy Financial Services Manager

    EC Executive Chairman

    FSS Financial Self Sufficiency

    FWWB Friends' for World Women Banking

    FY Financial Year

    HO Head Office

    HUDCO Housing Urban Development Corporation Limited

    IT Information Technology

    MF Microfinance

    MFI Microfinance Institution

    MIS Management Information SystemsMMBST Mirzapur Mutual Benefit Savings Trust

    NABARD National Agricultural Banking and Rural Development

    OSS Operational Self Sufficiency

    PAR Portfolio at Risk

    ROA Return on Assets

    ROE Return on Equity

    SHG Self Help Group

    SIDBI Small Industries Development Bank of India

    USAID The US Agency for International Development

    4

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    5/37

    Indicator Definition

    Adjusted operating expenses Operating expenses + subsidized cost of fund adjustment +

    inflation adjustmentAdministrative efficiency Administrative cost /average loan portfolio

    Capital adequacy Net worth / risk weighted assets

    Employee productivity No of active borrowers / no of loan officers

    Employee turnover Employees left during the year / total employees at the end of the

    period

    Financial self sufficiency Operating income / adjusted operating expenses

    Fund based yield Total fund based income / average funds employed

    Gross profit Gross spread + total fee based income

    Gross spread Total fund based income - total interest paid

    Inflation adjustments ( Average net worth - average fixed assets )

    * inflation rate

    Interest spread Fund based yield (interest paid/ average total borrowings)

    Operating expenses Total interest paid + total expenses + Total write-offs andprovisions + depreciation

    Operating income Total fund based income + Total fee based income

    Operational efficiency Total expenses / average total fund deployed

    Operational self sufficiency Operating income / operating expenses

    Personal expenses level (Employee expenses + incentives) / average loan portfolio

    PAR > 5 weeks Principal outstanding that balance that is late by more than 5

    weeks / total principal outstanding

    PAR > 15 weeks Principal outstanding that balance that is late by more than 15weeks/ total principal outstanding

    Return on assets Profit after tax /Average total funds deployed

    Return on equity Profit after tax /Average net worth

    Total assets Total fund deployed +net fixed assets (own)

    Total debt / net worth (Total long term borrowings + total short term borrowings) /

    net worth

    Total fund deployed Total investments + total current assets

    5

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    6/37

    FACT SHEET (As at March 31, 2002)

    Legal structure Public Limited Company

    Contact person Rakesh Kumar Dubey

    AGM-Finance

    Cashpor Financial & Technical Services LimitedPili Kothi, Mirzapur 231001

    Uttar Pradesh, India

    Tel : (91)5442 64437 /64439

    Fax: (91)5442 64437

    Year of incorporation 1996

    Geographical presence 10 branches across Mirzapur District.

    (Uttar Pradesh)

    Business approach Self Help GroupsActive borrowers 15,770

    Total staff 117

    Loan officers per unit 9

    Loans outstanding (Rs million) 54.78

    Avg. Loan size disbursed (Rs) 3,473

    Portfolio at risk (> 5 weeks) 1.88%

    Operational self-sufficiency 71.80%

    Financial self-sufficiency 58.04%

    6

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    7/37

    Rs million

    Financial Summary

    31/03/2002

    Un audited

    31/03/2001

    Audited

    31/03/2000

    Audited

    No of active loans 15,770 10,952 4,358

    Loan portfolio 54.78 30.35 6.70Reported net worth -17.71 -14.76 -10.58

    Total funds deployed 66.79 42.20 12.08

    Total income 13.71 5.03 2.00

    Profit after tax (Adjusted) -4.02 -3.92 -6.15

    Loan loss rate 1.19% 0.92% 3.36%

    Operational self-sufficiency 71.80% 36.73% 23.12%

    Financial self-sufficiency 58.04% 30.53% 19.17%

    Administrative efficiency 10.86% 16.87% 52.92%

    Operational efficiency 23.87% 39.45% 90.20%

    Portfolio-at-risk ( > 5 weeks ) 1.88% 1.12% 5.99%

    Return on assets -7.37% -14.43% -71.20%

    Total debt/net worth (times) -4.78 -3.90 -2.11Capital adequacy -28.71% -39.84% -103.34%

    Board of Directors

    Name Position

    Prof. David Gibbons Executive Chairman

    Mr. Sanjoy Dasgupta Director

    Dr. Sharada Nagarajan Director

    7

    David Gibbons, the Executive Chairman of

    CFTS, is a Canadian-born Malaysian citizen

    and is well known amongst the international

    microfinance community. Prof. Gibbons is adoctorate in politics from Princeton

    University (US) and was a research

    Professor at the Centre for Policy Research,University Sains Malaysia, till 1995.

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    8/37

    Outreach Summary31/03/2002 31/03/2001 31/03/2000

    Loan outstanding (Rs million) 54.78 30.35 6.70

    No of active loans 15,770 10,952 4,358

    No of branches 10 12 12

    Loan Accounts/branch 1,577 913 363

    Loan balance per loan account (in Rs) 3,473 2,771 1,536

    Loan outstanding/branch

    (Rs million)

    5.48 2.53 0.56

    Rs million

    Loan Outstanding (as on March 31, 2002)

    Institution Interest

    Rate (%)

    Outstanding

    Mirzapur Mutual Benefit Savings Trust 5.5 2.00

    Grameen Foundation, USA 2.0 10.45

    Grameen Foundation, USA 2.0 2.47

    Calvert Foundation 3.0 2.44

    Grameen Trust 2.0 14.23

    SIDBI 11.0 3.33

    SIDBI 11.0 7.90

    SIDBI 11.0 13.85

    SIDBI 6.0 1.95

    SIDBI 11.0 5.00

    NABARD 9.0 10.00

    FWWB 14.0 2.36

    FWWB 14.0 2.72

    FWWB 14.0 3.00FWWB 14.0 3.00

    Total 84.70

    Rs million

    8

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    9/37

    Resources of CFTS

    As at 31/03/2002

    (un audited)

    % 31/03/2001 % 31/03/2000 %

    Net worth -17.72 -25.35 -14.77 -32.56 -10.59 -74.73

    Loans from related

    entity

    2.00 2.86 2.00 4.46 0.00 0.00

    Borrowings

    Subordinated

    Senior

    82.70 118.36 55.51 123.90 22.34 157.81

    Current Liabilities 2.89 4.13 2.06 4.59 2.40 16.92

    Total 69.87 100.00 44.80 100.00 14.15 100.00

    Human resources summary

    31/03/2002 31/03/2001 31/03/2000

    Total employees 117 118 130

    Total employee left during year 10 18 36

    Employee turnover 8.55% 15.25% 27.69%

    Credit officers 85 89 100

    Loan outstanding/credit officer

    (Rs million)

    0.64 0.34 0.07

    Loan accounts per credit officer 186 123 44

    9

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    10/37

    Portfolio Summary

    Loan Outstanding in

    weeks

    31/03/2002 31/03/2001 31/03/2000

    Rs

    million

    % Rs

    million

    % Rs

    million

    %

    On time 53.47 97.62 29.81 98.24 6.05 90.23

    < 5 weeks 0.27 0.50 0.19 0.64 0.25 3.785-15 weeks 0.53 0.97 0.10 0.32 0.12 1.75

    16-25 weeks 0.40 0.71 0.10 0.32 0.15 2.24

    26 weeks and above 0.11 0.20 0.15 0.48 0.13 2.00

    Total 54.78 100.00 30.35 100.00 6.70 100.00

    PAR (> 5 weeks) 1.88% 1.12% 5.99%

    PAR (> 15 weeks) 0.91% 0.80% 4.24%

    Loan Outstanding by loan product (%)Loan Segment 31/03/2002 31/03/2001

    Animal husbandry 45.55 48.09

    Trading 24.46 26.93

    Production 13.32 12.94

    Transportation 5.40 5.47

    Agriculture 4.42 6.44

    Emergency 0.66 0.13

    Others 6.19 0.00

    Total 100.00 100.00

    10

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    11/37

    Assessment of CFTS using MICROS

    methodology

    11

    CENTRE MEETING

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    12/37

    MANAGEMENT

    SUB-PARAMETER COMMENTS

    History & track recordNumber of years in micro

    credit CFTS was promoted by Cashpor Technical Services Sdn Bhd

    (CTS), a Malaysian company, in 1996. CFTS commenced

    operations in July 1997 by starting two branches and became a

    public limited company in November 1999.Associate entities, their

    performance

    CTS provides management and field staff training, monitoring

    and evaluation services to Grameen Bank replicators throughout

    Asia. The company has also been publishing a quarterlynewsletterCredit for the Poorsince 1995.

    CTS is currently operating two MFI programmes CFTS in

    India and Moris Rasik in East TimorGrowth of MFI in thepast w.r.t programme,

    geography, clients and

    branches

    At the time of incorporation, CFTS set itself a goal to break-

    even within five years by maximizing its outreach to the poor

    (assuming that funding would be available). To achieve this, afive-year outreach target plan was chartered, based on which,

    CFTS established six branches by September 1997 and six more

    by October 1998. To maximize group formation from thebeginning, all branches were fully staffed in the first year of the

    branchs operations.

    Although, CFTS is currently present in five districts of Uttar

    Pradesh, its operations are restricted to Mirzapur and thesurrounding regions. The company plans to expand on a fullscaleto other districts after it achieves financial break-even.

    Alliances and network

    Strategic alliances(national &

    international), partners

    contribution, MFIs gains

    through the relationship

    Donor agencies support,

    appreciation etc.

    CFTS is part of the Cashpor Network and is well connected with

    other Grameen bank replicators in Asia.

    The company has been able to raise funds from international

    donor agencies like Grameen Foundation, Grameen Trust and

    Calvert Foundation, USA. It is also in an advanced stage ofdiscussions with USAID for grants to fund its next stage of

    expansion.

    Similarly, CFTS has been successful in accessing funds from

    SIDBI, NABARD and FWWB. However, the company has not

    been able to raise funds from commercial lending agencies.

    12

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    13/37

    SUB-PARAMETER COMMENTS

    Documentation levels

    Extent of documentationin terms of manuals on

    MFIs products, policies,processes, authorizations

    etc.

    The company has a detailed operational manual (both in English

    and Hindi), which is updated from time to time. Each staff

    member has been given a copy of the same. The operationalmanual document highlights the following:

    Client targeting practices

    Maintaining credit discipline at the centres

    Supervision and line of control

    Financial and internal control

    Procedures that need to be followed

    Loan products

    Staff policies, office rules, internal audit

    Human resources and disciplinary procedures.

    The company issues circulars to all branches informing them of

    any review /updation in policies. These changes aresubsequently updated in the operational manual.

    Detailed documentation of employment of staff and conditions

    of service (standing orders) as required by IndustrialEmployment (Standing Order) Act 1946 exists.

    There are pre-designed formats available for most activities like

    client exit surveys and surprise visits to branches by AGM-

    Operations.Adherence of the

    documented policies,

    procedures etc. in day today operations

    During its visits to the CFTS branches and HO, the CRISILTeam found that there was a high degree of adherence to

    documented policies by CFTSs staff.

    13

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    14/37

    SUB-PARAMETER COMMENTS

    Management

    Information Systems

    Credit approval

    mechanism

    Has well-defined loan disbursement practices

    CSR verifies the credentials of each prospective member and conducts

    housing index survey to determine the eligibility of the member.

    A group recognition test is conducted by an officer senior to the Branc

    Manager to determine the poverty status, trust amongst members and th

    level of awareness of terms and conditions of the microfinance programme.

    The maximum amount given to a new member is Rs 6,000 per loa

    Supplementary loan is given to the same client if required after observing th payment record for 4 months. These supplementary loans are, howev

    minimal and restricted to income generation loans.

    From the second loan onwards, the loan size is linked to the centre size anpayment track record of the centre.

    Loan and OverdueMonitoring systems

    There is a regular verification of loan utilisation by CSR, the Branch Manag

    and higher officials.

    Repayment collection is delegated to group members, the group leader an

    centre leaders at the centre meetings. Other members of the group need to pain case of default by a member that week. Peer pressure ensures payments o

    time.

    Surprise visits by Branch Manager and higher officials and internal audito

    ensure that CSRs monitor and supervise all the transactions.

    14

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    15/37

    SUB-PARAMETER COMMENTS

    Cash flow

    management system &Fraud control

    Reasonably established cash management systems are in place at all the

    branches. Cash is deposited on the same day in the local banks (except oWednesdays). There are controls on expenditure too at the branch level.

    The banks in the region do not conduct transactions on Wednesday. Tminimize the level of cash in hand on that day, the branches try to restrict the

    scheduled disbursements to the likely collections from centres.

    Emergency cash transfer between HO to branches and inter-branch cas

    transfer is treated as personal advance to the Branch Managers concerned til

    the time the cash reaches the branch. Disciplinary action is taken against Branch Manager who requires more than one emergency cash transfer in

    financial year.

    CFTS has had liquidity management problems in the past owing to delays iavailability of fresh funds. As funds are deployed to branches on first com

    first serve basis, the branch, in its interest, is required to submit its fund flow

    requirement on time.

    HO transfers funds to branches on fortnightly basis based on the fund flow

    requirement submitted by the branch.

    The branches maintain different cash vaults for petty cash, loan disbursemen

    and collection at present. Cash details are updated in both the cashbook anthe vault register before the end of the day.

    CFTS has had few instances of fraud in the past and the company has suitabl

    modified its systems immediately after detection of fraud.

    CFTS currently collects voluntary savings on behalf of the Mirzapur MutuaBenefit Savings Trust (MMBST). The CRISIL Team feels that there is scop

    for fraud as savings of one member can be used to adjust repayment o

    another member given the inability of the illiterate clients to verify thei

    savings passbooks.

    15

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    16/37

    SUB-PARAMETER COMMENTS

    Use of IT in

    operations

    Extent of hardware

    and softwareinfrastructure, is it

    commensurate withthe scale of

    operations, any

    perceived benefitsafter implementation

    CFTSs branch operations are computerized to a large extent. Data from

    branches to HO is sent through internet / floppies. At the HO, all departmenthave a computer and they are connected through a peer-to-peer network.

    The software, which has been purchased from Grameen CommunicationsBangladesh, has both loan portfolio tracking and accounting modules, which

    are well integrated with each other.

    The implementation of the software has resulted in timely report generatio

    (reduced from two weeks to one hour in some cases), greater accuracy an

    increased productivity.

    The software does have limitations, which the company has asked thsoftware vendor to rectify. The branch information (portfolio and accountscannot be automatically consolidated at the HO. Instead, they are transferred

    to Excel worksheets and then consolidated, which is a tedious process.

    Currently, the branches are also maintaining manual books of accounts.

    With the help of a tally sheet developed by the MIS department, the branch a

    the end of each week checks if the loan outstanding figures in the portfoliand monitoring modules tally with the manual accounts figures. This way th

    accuracy of the figures is verified.

    Now that the branches are comfortable with the software, CFTS plans to stopthe manual mode of accounting.

    At a later stage, the company plans to add additional modules like human

    resources and client information (loan utilisation, exit interviews) to it

    existing software modules.

    IT operationsmanagement

    security, access levels,

    application controlsetc.

    The security and access features of the software are good and better than the

    software currently being used by most Indian MFIs.

    Every user has his /her own password for entry into the software modulesThe system does not allow data editing of a prior date. All corrections

    modifications can be done only under the supervision of the MIS department

    Back-up data is stored in floppies so there is a danger of losing the data

    Going forward, CFTS could implement a better data recovery / disaste

    management process.

    16

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    17/37

    SUB-PARAMETER COMMENTS

    Human Resource

    Management

    Selection &

    recruitment processes

    Most of the Senior Managers and Branch Managers at CFTS are Post

    Graduate Diploma Holders in rural management from the Institute oEngineering and Rural Technology, Allahabad.

    The minimum qualification for a CSR post is 10+2 for male candidates and10th standard for female candidates. Candidates having a rural backgroun

    with similar socio-economic status as the companys clients are give

    preference. The company says that it receives numerous applications from

    Mirzapur and neighboring districts. Staff vacancies in Accounts and MISfunctions are advertised in the newspapers.

    There have been some instances of CSRs getting promoted to Branc

    Managers but these are few. Candidates with higher qualifications arrecruited for Branch Manager positions.

    The company has a defined and transparent promotion policy. For example

    Branch Managers are graded on the following parameters: branc

    performance (weightage 50%), written test (25%), surprise visits of branchcentre (15%) and timely reporting and quality of reporting (10%).

    Training The CRISIL Team has found a reasonably good training system at CFTS.

    The company has established a training department to look after the trainingneeds of the existing staff and of new recruits. New recruits undergclassroom training and need to clear a written test before being transferred to

    branches for on-field training. At the end of each month, the trainee comes t

    the HO for classroom training, feedback and examination. If performance ifound unsatisfactory, the training of that phase is extended.

    Training programmes are also conducted on requests from Branch Managerand are based on the specific training needs of staffers. MFI experts are als

    invited to visit CFTS to share their experiences with the companys staff.

    Staff at the HO are sent for specialized training programmes after approvafrom the Board. In the formative years, most senior staffers at the HO wen

    through various MFI training programmes in India and abroad.

    17

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    18/37

    SUB-PARAMETER COMMENTS

    Role definition Roles of each function at both branch and HO are clearly defined.

    During its discussions with the CFTS staff at both the HO andbranches, the CRISIL Team found that there is a high degree of

    clarity amongst the staff about their roles and responsibilities.

    As mentioned earlier, the Operations Manual clearly defines the

    activity of each function of the organizational hierarchy.

    Accountability &responsibility,

    Performance

    evaluation

    Clear role definition has helped in each employee being madeaccountable and responsible for his work. Budgetary targets are

    compared with actual performance.

    Incentives to CSRs are based on borrower, saver and interest

    income targets achieved by them. HO staffs incentive are in turn

    dependant on the incentives earned by the operational staff, which

    are arrived by dividing the incentives of CSR+ Branch Managers +Deputy Financial Services Managers (DFSM) + AGM (Operations)

    with the total productive staff.

    Branch staff can earn up to 40% of their basic salary through

    monthly and quarterly incentives resulting in high accountability.

    Attrition rates,

    Motivation levels

    CFTSs attrition rates have declined to 8.55% (FY 2001-2002) from

    27.69% (FY 1999-2000). Deterioration in the loan portfolio qualityduring FY 1999-2000 had resulted in high attrition in early FY

    2000-2001. Also, a number of fresh recruits had left a few weeksafter joining the company.

    Annual salary increases have been at the rate of 5% (maximum)

    and CFTSs management had promised to review salaries after

    achieving institutional break-even. The CRISIL Team noticedheightened expectations of a salary hike among the staff. Any

    delay in announcing a salary revision or the same not meeting

    employee expectations could have an impact on their motivationlevels. As discussed later in Operational Effectiveness, relatively

    low employee productivity has had a direct bearing on the company

    achieving Operational Self Sufficiency, which CRISIL considers tobe an important milestone for the MFI.

    18

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    19/37

    SUB-PARAMETER COMMENTS

    Processes, Controls

    & Audit

    Head office levelcontrols

    Group, Centre,Branch office level

    control systems

    HO controls are in the form of monitoring the operational and

    financial performance of the branches and comparing them with thetargets set at the beginning of the year.

    DFSMs and AGM (Operations) frequently make surprise visits tocentres and branches.

    A purchase committee reviews all non-asset purchase decisions.

    All asset purchase decisions are approved by the Board.

    Cash and bank balances are regularly monitored by the HO. Any

    deviations from the normal are immediately acted upon.

    Are independentaudits being carried

    out, nature and scope

    of audits, quality ofsuch reports,

    experience of auditors

    in this field?

    The company's audit firm visits a few branches every year to check

    if proper records are maintained. Currently, accounts are audited

    every six months.

    CFTSs auditor is also the auditor for other leading MFIs in the

    country. CRISIL is not comfortable, however, with the accounting

    policies followed by the company. These are:

    Frequent change in policy for provisioning of loan loss reserve.

    Group development expenditure, a major expense item for any

    Grameen Bank type MFI, is treated as deferred revenue

    expenditure and is being amortized over a period of five years,

    thereby under-reporting losses. CRISIL has readjusted the

    same.

    Efficacy of internalaudit

    CFTS has a team of two internal auditors with branch and fieldlevel experience. Typical branch audit is between two to three

    weeks.

    At the end of internal audit of the branch, the audit reportcontaining the highlights of audit and serious breaches committed

    at that particular branch. is sent to the Executive Chairman (EC) of

    CFTS

    19

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    20/37

    SUB-PARAMETER COMMENTS

    Efficacy of internal

    audit Some of the positive feature of internal audit at CFTS are:a) HO is also is under the internal audit purview

    b) The internal audit team does an exit survey of the drop-outclients to understand the reasons for drop-out

    Branch Manager has to sign the compliance report mentioning that

    requested action has been complied within the specified date.

    The CRISIL Team feels CFTSs internal audit is quite effective.

    Some of the internal audit reports are frank in pointing out even

    minor procedural deviations by Senior Managers at the HO. Therehave been instances of branch staff being terminated based on the

    findings of the internal audit team.

    Social impact on

    environment/localimpact

    Availability of Impact

    Assessment Studies

    A study done by an external consultant during October 2000-March

    2001 revealed that 74% of CFTSs mature clients (who have

    borrowed 4 times) experienced significant reduction in theirpoverty.

    CFTS uses a housing index to identify households below the poverty line. Only those classified as moderately poor and very

    poor are eligible to become members.

    Credibility andconclusions of the

    Impact AssessmentStudy

    During visits to centre meetings and households of clients, theCRISIL team found CFTSs housing index to be effective in

    identifying the poor. It is therefore likely that the impact of itsprogrammes would be high

    20

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    21/37

    INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTSUB-PARAMETER COMMENTS

    Management,

    ownership &governing board

    Pedigree of

    promoters, their

    experience,recognition in this

    field, years of

    experience

    Involvement in theday-to-day operations

    Structure of the board,

    diversity of thetechnical expertise on

    the board - such as

    finance, law,

    marketing etc.

    Professional

    reputation of theboard members

    Independence of theboard from the

    management

    Organisation structure

    Experience of keymanagementpersonnel

    Management'sunderstanding of

    issues in MFI sector

    David Gibbons, the Executive Chairman of CFTS, is a Canadian-born

    Malaysian citizen and is well known amongst the internationalmicrofinance community. Prof. Gibbons is a doctorate in politics from

    Princeton University (US) and was a research Professor at the Centre

    for Policy Research, University Sains Malaysia, till 1995. He was thefounder and the first Managing Director of Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia

    (AIM), one of the first replications of Grameen Bank outside

    Bangladesh. In 1993, he, along with Prof. Mohammed Yunus ofGrameen Bank and others, formed Cashpor Inc.

    Prof. Gibbons is also currently the Executive Trustee of CASHPOR

    Inc. and the Managing Director of CTS. He is also a member of thePolicy Advisory Group of CGAP since May 2001. He has to his credit,

    many books and training manuals that are widely used in the

    microfinance sector. The Grameen Readerand Banking on the Rural

    Poorare amongst his well-known books.

    Mr. Sanjoy Dasgupta, Director of CFTS is a social developmentspecialist and is also the Chief Administrative Officer of Peoples

    Institute of Development and Training, a Delhi-based NGO. Dr..

    Sharada Nagarajan, the other Director of CFTS, is an IT Consultant,with a focus on software development for the MFI sector. Ms.

    Nagarajan is related to one of the partners of CFTSs external audit

    firm.

    Except for Prof. Gibbons, the other two Directors do not have any past

    experience of working in a microfinance institution.

    The Executive Chairman is present at Mirzapur for a month every

    quarter and spends the rest of his time in Malaysia and East Timor.

    CFTS had an experienced General Manager, who was transferred to

    Moris Rasik in East Timor in 1999. Since then, CFTS is beingmanaged by two Acting General Managers (AGM) looking after

    Finance and Operations respectively.

    Both the AGMs have been with the organisation for more than five

    years.

    21

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    22/37

    SUB-PARAMETER COMMENTS

    Corporate

    governance practices

    Are mainstream

    corporate governancepractices sensitized in

    the operations?

    The Board meets every quarter to review the performance and policies

    of the organisation. The documented board meetings reflect that theBoard members also discuss fund requirements and strategies for fund

    mobilization.

    CFTS conducts regular monthly meetings to review operations. All

    HO staff and branch managers attend these meetings.

    Overall assessment interms of practices,

    processes and people

    While the organisation does have policies and systems in place, it is

    important to have a full-time CEO. The absence of an experiencedCEO is especially felt for raising funds and the overall coordination

    within the organisation.

    Goals & ObjectivesArticulation of Vision

    - medium & long term Has a formally defined vision statement which focuses on providing

    prompt and appropriate access to financial services to poor women,who would use these services to lift their families out of poverty

    CFTSs mission statement focuses on identifying and motivatingpoor women in rural areas and delivering financial services to them in

    an honest, timely and efficient manner so that its vision is realized and

    the organisation becomes a financially sustainable MFI for the poor

    Articulation of

    strategies to achievestated goals

    CFTS has articulated its objective to become financially self-sufficient

    by September 2002.As evident from the un-audited March 2002financials, however, achieving this goal could take longer than

    planned.

    22

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    23/37

    CAPITALADEQUACYANDASSETQUALITYSUB-PARAMETER COMMENTS

    Asset quality

    Portfolio at Risk PAR (> 5 weeks) had declined to 1.12% as at March 31, 2001 from 5.99%

    as at March 31, 2000.But this indicator has marginally increased to 1.88%as at March 31, 2002.

    PAR (> 15 weeks) has declined to 0.91% as at March 31, 2002 from 4.24%as at March 31, 2000.

    The portfolio quality improvement during 2000-01 was achieved throughincreasing staff and client incentives, increased peer pressure and through

    improvement in the credit approval system.

    Write-off levels Till FY 2000-01, CFTS had a policy to write-off loans outstanding only onfirst loan borrower deaths. The company did not have a policy to provide

    for loan defaults.

    Till FY 1999-00, the company had a policy of providing 2% on the total

    outstanding portfolio. During FY 2000-01, the policy was changed to

    providing a loan loss provision of 10% on the principal outstanding past

    due by four weeks and 100% on the principal outstanding, where therepayment period has expired in full. While the provisions appear to be

    sufficient, the company should adopt a scientific provisioning policy inline with international practices. Based on these practices, CRISIL has

    provided an additional loan loss provision of Rs 0.15 million during FY

    1999-2000.

    Capital Adequacy

    Capital adequacy Since inception, CFTS has adopted an unconventional financing strategy

    as social investors were unwilling to provide capital to a new MFI. So

    CFTS borrowed long term-subsidized debt to finance its deficits prior to

    institutional financial break-even. While the subsidized debt enabled CFTSto grow and to attract sufficient on-lending funds according to the

    projections of its business plan, the unconventional financing strategy has

    translated into negative equity on the balance sheet. The CAGR of 345%in the loan portfolio during the past five years has been achieved almost

    entirely through subsidized borrowings rather than equity. Therefore,

    CFTS registered negative capital adequacy for the past five years. As perthe business plan, the company was not projected to register profits until

    its sixth year of operation. CFTS found raising additional debt difficult, as

    23

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    24/37

    its accumulated losses continued to increase. SIDBI Foundation for Micro

    Credit and FWWB, Indias two main apex microfinance institutions have

    24

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    25/37

    SUB-PARAMENTER COMMENTS

    been the main lenders to CFTS in the past few years. The stabilization andthe increased scale of CFTSs operations appear to have drawn attention

    from commercial banks. It is presently in the final stages of negotiating a

    Rs 15 million loan from ICICI Bank, that will be based on a 50% guaranteefrom Deutsche Bank Microcredit Development fund (MCDF) of NewYork.

    CFTSs management is confident of being able to wipe off the companysaccumulated losses through internal accruals in the medium term besides

    repaying the subsidized debt on time. Despite achieving break-even in the

    current financial year, it may face difficulty in raising the large amount of

    additional on-lending funds; it will need over the next t few years.

    Ability to raise equity In the past, the company has been able to raise long-term subsidized debtbut not equity or capital grants. Unless CFTS is able to raise significant

    equity or grants, or to retain sizeable earnings, it would be difficult for theorganisation to sustain operations in the medium term.

    Given its success in reaching its business Plan targets and its effectiveness

    in poverty-reduction, CFTS could request for a conversion of its

    subsidised debt into non-returnable grants in order to have a comfortablecapital structure.

    25

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    26/37

    RESOURCES

    SUB-PARAMETER COMMENTS

    Ability to raise

    resources

    Current funding

    sources, adequacy ofthe same

    Diversity in fundingsources

    Percentage of fundingfrom members

    Impact of the legal

    structure of MFI inraising resources

    Ability to attractdonor funds, current

    relationships

    The company has funding sources like SIDBI, FWWB, NABARD,

    Grameen Foundation of USA, Grameen Trust and Calvert

    Foundation.

    SIDBI and Grameen Trust & Grameen Foundation accounted for

    38% and 32% of the loans outstanding respectively as at March 31,2002.

    CFTS has also borrowed from Mirzapur Mutual Benefits Savings

    Trust (MMBST). In FY 2000-01, the company had transferred itssavings mobilization activity to the above Trust. MMBST was

    formed to mobilize deposits from its members via CFTS and then

    lend a part of the mobilized deposits to CFTS. The companymanagement has admitted to the CRISIL Team that as voluntary

    savings grow in size, it could be increasingly difficult to manage

    these funds.

    At present, the company is trying to raise additional equity to meet

    the Rs 20 million requirement for becoming an NBFC. CFTSscurrent problems have more to do with its increasing difficulty in

    raising on lending funds in a timely manner , which would be a

    constraint factor for social investors, rather than its legal structure.

    CFTS created a delivery infrastructure first anticipating an

    adequate amount of borrowed funds. But delay in fresh borrowings

    in FY 2001-02 resulted in the company not being able to meet itsBusiness Plan target for the end March 2002. This delay therefore

    also had a direct bearing on the companys earnings.

    As mentioned earlier, the company is in an advanced stage of

    discussions with USAID for grants to fund its next stage ofexpansion.

    CFTS is currently negotiating for soft loans and a line of credit

    with local and international lending institutions. Its ability to

    attract such funds on time will have a direct bearing on its currentoperations.

    26

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    27/37

    SUB-PARAMETER COMMENTS

    Cost of funds

    Average cost of funds Average cost of funds has increased to 7.17 % (FY 2001-02) from

    2.81% (FY 1999-00). This is on account of higher borrowings

    from FWWB at 14% and SIDBI at 11%.

    Subsidizedborrowings as a % of

    total liabilities

    The entire borrowings are subsidised considering that the highest

    interest paid is 14% (FWWB).

    Liquidity & Asset

    Liability

    Management

    Loans as a % of total

    assets Loan portfolio was 78% of total assets as at March 31, 2002 as

    against 47% as at March 31, 2000. Security to institutions like

    SIDBI, which is held as a deposit, is the second-highest component

    of CFTSs assets (7.58% as at March 31, 2002).

    Asset liability

    mismatch There is no ALM as all of CFTSs micro finance borrowings other

    than those from FWWB (2 years) have a tenure of 4-12 years. Onthe other hand, the company lends only for a 50-week tenure to its

    clients.

    27

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    28/37

    OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESSSUB-PARAMETER COMMENTS

    Office outreach and

    quality ofinfrastructure

    Geographical areascovered

    Employeeproductivity

    Client targetingpractices

    CFTSs branches currently cover most of Mirzapur and small parts of

    Allahabad, Bhadohi, Chandauli and Varanasi districts of Uttar Pradesh.Expansion in districts other than Mirzapur or opening up new branches

    should be taken up only after the company achieves financial break-even

    from the existing branches.

    The loan accounts per loan officer has increased to 186 accounts as at

    March 31, 2002 from 44 as at March 31, 2000. During this period, thenumber of branches has come down to 10 from 12 branches earlier (by

    re-organisation) and the number of credit officers has fallen to 85 from100.

    The above productivity level is low considering that no new branches

    have been added. The poor choice of branch locations appears to be the

    main reason for this low productivity. The CRISIL Team has observedthat most of the centres are located far from the branches resulting in

    only two centre meetings a day per credit officer. There is also ample

    scope for increasing the number of groups per centre. Productivity is alsolost in collecting voluntary savings for the MMBST.

    Has been successful in implementing a cost-effective client targetingtechnique (housing index) to identify its clients.

    Efficiency Ratios

    Staff allocation ratio Loan officers to total staff as at March 31 2002 was 73% though it has

    declined from 77% as at March 31, 2000.

    Operationalefficiency

    CFTSs operational efficiency has come down sharply to 23.9% (March

    31, 2002) from 90.2% (March 31, 2001). But this is still higher than the

    South Asian average of 18.5%.

    The reduction in operating efficiency during the above period was

    largely on account of improved employee productivity, a directconsequence of a greater number of clients. Reduction of group

    development expenses has also caused the operational efficiency to fall

    below the 25% level.

    28

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    29/37

    SUB-PARAMETER COMMENTS

    Administrative cost

    per loan action The average administrative costs divided by the gross portfolio declined

    to 10.9% during FY 2001-02 from 52.9% in FY 1999-00. This is wellbelow the South Asian average of 16.6%.

    Personnel expense

    levels The ratio of personnel expenses to average assets has declined to 15.4%

    (FY 2001-02) from 61.6% (FY 1999-00). But this is higher than the

    South Asian average of 5.4%. Lower employee productivity than other

    Indian Grameen Bank replicators and relatively higher salaries accountfor CFTSs high expenses.

    Profitability

    Operational self

    sufficiency (OSS)

    Growth in Income

    An OSS of 71.80% for FY 2001-02 indicates that CFTSs credit

    programme is still dependent on operational grants and subsidized debtfor meeting its operational expenses. The sharp improvement in this

    indicator from 23.12% in FY 1999-00 is on account of the decline in thenumber of branches and employees and at the same time, the increase inthe number of clients.

    Growth in operating income has been strong during the past twofinancial years, increasing by 152% in FY 2000-01 and by 173% in FY

    2001-02 respectively over the corresponding previous years. On the

    other hand the operating expenses (excluding cost of funds) increased byonly 37% and 21% respectively. The company expects to achieve 100%

    plus OSS in the current financial year as the operating income is

    anticipated to be higher than total operating costs.

    Financial selfsufficiency (FSS)

    The FSS of 58.04% for FY 2001-02 improved from 19.17% in FY 1999-

    00.

    Return on Equity The ratio of adjusted profit after tax to average equity has been negative for

    the past three years as the company registered losses even after adjusting for

    operational grants /donations. Also, the networth has been wiped off.However, these are anticipated losses and in line with the projections made

    in the business plan.

    Return on Assets CFTS had a negative ROA of 7.37%.

    29

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    30/37

    SCALABILITY AND SUSTAINABILITYSUB-PARAMETER COMMENTS

    Resource base

    sustainabilityFund raising strategies inplace.

    Are current efficiency,profitability levels

    sustainable at larger

    scale of operations,

    diversity etc?

    The companys inability to raise funds on time and raise the required

    equity and soft loans has been a major shortcoming in the past.

    Without fresh infusion of funds, CFTS will not be in a position toincrease its loan portfolio and therefore, improve employee

    productivity. Hence, the immediate priority for CFTSs management

    would be to raise additional funds.

    CFTS needs to look out for ways to cover its costs. The company

    absorbs significant capacity building expenses, which could be passedon to clients. The company has significant pre-payments and it could

    consider imposing penalty charges to improve its yields.Organizational

    sustainability - Ability to

    develop into a

    mainstream financial

    institution

    Legal Structure

    Issues The company plans to remain a corporate entity as commercial lenders

    are more comfortable with corporate entities rather than trusts and

    societies. Since CFTS is unable to raise additional equity to transform

    into an NBFC, the Board is considering forming a Section 25company, which will take over the operations of CFTS and raise equity

    from CFTSs clients. As Section 25 companies are not allowed to shareprofits, the client shareholders are to be charged lower interest rates

    than normal clients.

    In reality, however, CFTSs high-cost microfinance programmes maynot allow it to offer differential interest rates to clients. The ability to

    raise substantial equity from the poor also needs to be demonstrated.

    Corporate Governance

    Issues There is a need to have a full-time CEO given Prof Gibbons other

    engagements. There is a clear need for a person who can focus ondeveloping the right credit product and appropriate credit delivery

    mechanisms, raise funds and monitor the companys overall

    performance on a monthly basis.

    The Board needs to be broad-based with participation from lending

    agencies like SIDBI and FWWB. It is important to have on Board, people with fund-raising capabilities besides some microfinance

    practitioners who could offer useful insights.

    30

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    31/37

    SUB-PARAMETER COMMENTS

    Succession Issues Though the frequent absence of Prof. Gibbons has, in a way, enabled

    the development of the two young AGMs, who manage the day-to-day

    operations, CFTS needs to have a CEO in command to overlookcrucial roles such as coordination and monitoring.

    Human Resources As mentioned earlier, the CRISIL Team has noticed that the staff hashigh expectations of a salary increase. CFTSs current financial health

    does not permit such salary revisions. It is important for the company

    to keep its staff motivated while at the same time keeping its personnel

    costs low.

    The company is overstaffed for its current level of operations. It needsto study whether there is a possibility of downsizing the number of

    branches and increasing the group size or number of groups per centre

    so that employee productivity goes up.

    Programmesustainability - Ability to

    sustain operations on a

    larger scale

    Sectoral expertise has

    been built In the past, CFTS had tried a credit plus approach in the poultry sector

    wherein clients were provided with the necessary technical inputs

    besides poultry loans. The company quickly shelved this approach

    when it realized that it had neither the time nor resources for a credit

    plus approach.

    Past track record to enter

    new segments,geographical areas

    CFTSs priority should be achieving financial break-even with the

    existing operations before it can expand to new districts or open newbranches.

    The company has operated in both drought-prone and fertile regions inand around Mirzapur in the past and it should not be difficult for the

    organisation to expand to other districts in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, if

    funds for such expansion were available.

    Long term outlook ofprogrammes are clearly

    envisioned

    CFTS hopes to achieve financial break-even by third quarter of current

    financial year. Hence, any expansion plans (to new districts) would bedecided after that.

    CFTSs medium-term and long-term outlook clearly depends on the

    availability of grants or equity.

    31

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    32/37

    SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES FOR THE COMPANY

    Method of accounting

    The accounts have been prepared under historical cost conventions and on accrual basis, exceptas otherwise stated.

    Revenue recognition

    1. Interest on loans is recognized on accrual basis, calculated on a flat rate basis on the loans

    disbursed.

    2. Income on non-performing assets is recognized only when realized and on interest on such

    assets which have remained past due for more than six months at the end of the accounting

    period is treated as income.

    Fixed assets

    1. They are stated at cost.

    2. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method at the rates specified in Schedule XIV of

    the companies Act, 1956 on the proportionate period of use.

    Loans and advances

    In tune with the nature of business of the company, (collateral free loans to groups of rural poorwomen) and portfolio experience, provisions for loan losses are made on basis of 100% on the

    principal outstanding where the repayment period has expired in full and 10% on the principal of

    all outstanding where the loans have become past due by four weeks. Such provision is largerthan the provision required under the Non Banking Financial Companies Prudential Norms

    (Reserve Bank) Directions 1998.

    Retirement Benefits:

    Contribution to provident fund and gratuity are accounted on actual liability basis.

    Preliminary, pre-incorporation and pre-operative expenses

    Will be fully written off on the generation of profits in the first instance.

    Deferred revenue expenditure

    The company has the policy of writing of in five years time in equal installments form the year in

    which the development expenditure was incurred, whereas CRISIL has adjusted these as

    expensed incurred during the year.

    Write off policy

    32

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    33/37

    The institution writes off loans, which are overdue since one year and those without any

    payment of interest or principal during the year. Considering that the loan tenure is usually oneyear, CFTSs write-off policy appears reasonable and far stringent than those followed by non-

    banking financial companies in India. Hence no additional write-off adjustments have been done

    by CRISIL.

    LOAN LOSS PROVISION

    PORTFOLIO

    CLASSIFICATION % 31/03/2002 PROVISION 31/03/2001 PROVISION 31/03/2000 PROVISION

    Current Portfolio 0 53.47 0.00 29.81 0.00 6.04 0.00

    Current RescheduledLoan Portfolio 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

    < 5weeks 10 0.27 0.03 0.19 0.02 0.25 0.03

    5-15 weeks 30 0.53 0.16 0.10 0.03 0.12 0.04

    16-25 weeks 60 0.39 0.23 0.10 0.06 0.15 0.09

    Beyond 26 weeks 100 0.11 0.11 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.13

    Portfolio in Legal

    Recovery 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

    Total Portfolio 54.78 0.53 30.35 0.25 6.70 0.28

    Balance Sheet LoanLoss Provision (prior

    to current year

    CRISIL Adjustment) 0.82 0.54 0.13

    CRISIL Loan LossProvision (2) 0.53 0.25 0.28

    Difference to Adjust(2) - (1) -0.29 -0.29 0.15

    Add additional Loan

    Loss Provision 0.00 0.00 0.15

    33

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    34/37

    INCOME AND EXPENDITURE STATEMENTS

    Rs million

    For the period ended 31/03/2002 31/03/2001 31/03/2000

    12 months 12 months 12 months

    Un audited Audited Audited

    Fund based incomeTotal interest income from loans 12.86 4.48 1.31

    Other income 0.62 0.46 0.50

    Total fund based income 13.48 4.94 1.81

    Interest paid

    On bank borrowings 5.10 2.34 0.46

    Total interest paid 5.10 2.34 0.46

    Gross spread 8.39 2.61 1.34

    Fee based income

    Other fee based income 0.23 0.09 0.20

    Total fee based income 0.23 0.09 0.20

    Total income 13.71 5.03 2.00

    Gross profit 8.61 2.69 1.54

    Expenses

    Personnel expenses 7.32 3.26 3.11

    Administrative expenses 4.62 3.13 2.47

    Group development and capacity 1.07 4.32 2.20

    Total expenses 13.01 10.71 7.79

    Write-offs and provisions

    Provision for exchange rate variation 0.08 0.15 0.00

    Write-off of bad debts 0.37 0.02 0.09

    Provision for loan loss 0.28 0.25 0.13Add provision for Loan Losses (adj. by CRISIL) 0.00 0.00 0.00

    Total 0.73 0.43 0.25

    Depreciation on owned assets 0.26 0.22 0.16

    Profit before tax -5.38 -8.66 -6.66

    Tax 0.00 0.00 0.00

    Profit after tax (reported) -5.38 -8.66 -6.66

    Add: Grants and donations 1.37 4.75 0.51

    Profit after tax (adjusted) -4.02 -3.92 -6.15

    Accretion to reserves (adjusted) -4.02 -3.92 -6.15

    34

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    35/37

    BALANCE SHEET

    Rs million

    Liabilities 31/03/2002 31/03/2001 31/03/2000

    Un audited Audited Audited

    Share capital 0.81 0.81 0.81Share application money 0.72 0.72 0.72

    Loan Loss Reserve 0.00 0.00 0.00

    Accumulated, net surplus (deficit), previous periods -15.21 -11.29 -5.15

    Net Surplus (deficit), current period -4.02 -3.92 -6.15

    Less: Miscellaneous expenditure not written off -0.01 -1.08 -0.81

    Net worth (reported) -17.71 -14.76 -10.58

    Subsidized Loans 82.70 54.68 21.42

    Bank loans 0.00 0.82 0.92

    Loan from related entity 2.00 2.00 0.00

    Total long term borrowings 84.70 57.51 22.34

    Sundry creditors 1.09 0.45 0.25Savings from borrowers 0.04 0.00 0.83

    Interest Accrued but not due 0.00 0.60 0.36

    Other liabilities 1.09 0.46 0.64

    Statutory liabilities 0.00 0.13 0.16

    Provision for interest tax 0.00 0.03 0.03

    Provision for loan loss 0.67 0.39 0.13

    Total current liabilities 2.89 2.06 2.40

    Total liabilities 69.87 44.80 14.15

    Assets

    Cash & bank balances 2.55 3.10 0.63Deposits with banks 5.30 3.90 2.65

    Total 5.30 3.90 2.65

    Loans & advances 54.78 30.35 6.70

    Inventory 0.00 0.09 0.12

    Loans to Staff 0.33 0.75 0.64

    Other Current Assets 3.83 4.03 1.34

    Total current assets 66.79 42.20 12.08

    Total funds deployed 66.79 42.20 12.08

    Net fixed assets (own) 3.09 2.60 2.08

    Total assets 69.87 44.80 14.15

    35

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    36/37

    Economic Indicators used for Operating Expense Adjustment

    31/03/2002 31/03/2001 31/03/2000

    Inflation 3.6% 7.1% 3.3%

    Commercial rate for the

    Institution

    14.50% 15.50% 15.50%

    KEY FINANCIAL RATIOS

    Year ended 31/03/2002 31/03/2001 31/03/2000

    Yield

    Fund based yields 24.74% 18.22% 20.91%

    Cost of funds

    Interest Paid/Average funds deployed 9.35% 8.62% 5.36%

    Interest Paid/Average borrowings 7.17% 5.86% 2.81%

    Interest spread

    Gross Spread/Average funds deployed 15.39% 9.60% 15.55%

    Interest spread 17.57% 12.36% 18.11%

    Overheads

    Operational efficiency 23.87% 39.45% 90.20%

    Personnel expenses level 15.39% 27.94% 61.61%

    Administrative efficiency 10.86% 16.87% 52.92%

    Profitability

    PBT/Average funds deployed -9.88% -31.93% -77.15%

    BPAT/Average Net worth * NM NM NM

    Return on equity NM NM NMBPAT/Average funds deployed -9.88% -31.93% -77.15%

    Return on assets -7.37% -14.43% -71.20%

    Operational self sufficiency 71.80% 36.73% 23.12%

    Financial self sufficiency 58.04% 30.53% 19.17%

    Loan loss rate 1.19% 0.92% 3.36%

    Capitalization

    Total Debt/Net worth -4.78 -3.90 -2.11

    Capital adequacy -28.71% -39.84% -103.34%

    * NM = Not Meaningful

    36

  • 8/14/2019 Cashpor Apr 2002

    37/37

    Disclaimer

    This report is a product of CredibilityFirst (CF), a division of CRISIL. CF has taken due care andcaution in the preparing the report. CF has obtained the information from sources which it

    considers reliable. However, CRISIL and CF do not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or

    completeness of any information and are not responsible for any errors or omissions for the

    results / opinions obtained from the use of such information. CRISIL and CF are not responsiblefor any errors in transmission and especially states that it has no financial liability whatsoever to

    the users of this product. The rating grade also does not involve an audit by CF.

    This evaluation is a capacity assessment opinion and hence cannot be considered to be a proxy

    for timely payment of interest and principal. Nor is it a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold

    any debt instrument.

    CRISIL may revise, suspend or withdraw the evaluation as a result of information changes in

    circumstances or unavailability of information. This is a private copy and no part of this report

    may be published / reproduced /distributed in any form without CRISILs prior written approval.

    CredibilityFirst and CRISIL are the registered trademarks of THE CREDIT RATING

    INFORMATION SERVICES OF INDIA LIMITED.

    Copyright2001 by CRISIL. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced in

    any form, without permission in writing from CRISIL