8/7/2019 case10

1/3

8/7/2019 case10

2/3

G78

Figure C10.2 Voltage drop due to the current

Figure C10.3 Separated ground systems

Therefore, the first solution proposed to this problem was simply to split the ground

system of the sensible electronic appliances (Figure C10.3) from that of machinery causingdisturbances (in this case some VSDs).

The datasheets of the sensible electronic appliances were then checked: the manufac-

turer had prescribed connection of its appliances only to a so-called clean earth.This solution was then adopted: a new ground system was installed, far from the

existing one near the boundary of the plant, and used only for the connection of sensible

electronic appliances. As a result, every problem disappeared.

A further analysis of the problem was to determine if the implemented solution wascorrect or not: the answer is that it depends on the point of view.

If there is a possibility of someone touching simultaneously two exposed conductive

parts connected to the two different systems, the solution cannot be considered correct: the

person would be subjected to the voltage difference between the two ground systems.As much as the two systems are independent, the situation is dangerous because the

voltage disturbance becomes a touching voltage.If it is guaranteed that nobody can touch two exposed conductive parts connected to

the two different systems at the same time, the solution is obviously correct.

The real issue is to have a situation in which nobody can ever do this. So the eventuality

should be considered that it is not possible to divide the two earthing systems: how can theproblem be solved in this situation?

8/7/2019 case10

3/3

G79

In principle two different solutions exist and can be adopted:

1. To operate at the level of the appliances, choosing them with a higher immunity level.

2. To work at the level of the installation.

The first one is of course the easiest solution, even if it cannot be considered a solutionbut just circumventing the problem. For this reason it is better to concentrate on the second

solution, and to add just a small philosophical comment on the first one.A system engineer could probably argue that it his duty to feed appliances, not to

select them on the basis of some kinds of issues. This is partially true, but if we considerthat engineers usually have to select equipment on the basis of International Protection (IP)

grade against pollution, why not to choose that equipment on the basis of electromagneticIP grade against electromagnetic pollution? The concept is exactly the same.

The international standard does not contain any prescription or suggestion about low-noise equipotential bonding except for a special symbol (Figure 10.31).

The methods used to deal with the problem at installation level come from goodpractice, which every system engineer should know:

Requirements related to protective measures must prevail. Independent earthing systems are allowed only in case exposed conductive parts are not

contemporaneously accessible. Separate sensitive and disturbing circuits. Avoid parallelisms. Adopt line balance. Use shields and double shields. Adopt differentiated conductors.