case study on interaction between the eia and the habitas directive comments to the solution...

6
Case Study on interaction between the EIA and the Habitas Directive Comments to the solution Workshop in Trier, 17 – 19 March 2014 1

Upload: anabel-carson

Post on 17-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case Study on interaction between the EIA and the Habitas Directive Comments to the solution Workshop in Trier, 17 – 19 March 2014 1

Workshop in Trier, 17 – 19 March 2014

1

Case Study on interaction between the EIA and the Habitas Directive

Comments to the solution

Page 2: Case Study on interaction between the EIA and the Habitas Directive Comments to the solution Workshop in Trier, 17 – 19 March 2014 1

Workshop in Trier, 17 – 19 March 2014

2

1. Question a) EIA Annex I 2. (a) and 24. to the Directive (if 300 or

more MW)

or Annex II 3. (a)

b) FFH

See: EU Commission’s guidance“MANAGING NATURA 2000 SITES The provisions of Article 6 of the ‘Habitats’

Directive 92/43/EEC”

Page 3: Case Study on interaction between the EIA and the Habitas Directive Comments to the solution Workshop in Trier, 17 – 19 March 2014 1

Workshop in Trier, 17 – 19 March 2014

3

Page 31

“As regards geographical scope, the provisions of Article 6(3) are not restricted to plans and projects which exclusively occur in or cover a protected site; they also target developments situated outside the site but likely to have a significant effect on it.”

2.   Question Principally national law applies, but– Interpretation consistent with the Directive– In case of conflict: Eventually direct effect of the Directive

Page 4: Case Study on interaction between the EIA and the Habitas Directive Comments to the solution Workshop in Trier, 17 – 19 March 2014 1

Workshop in Trier, 17 – 19 March 2014

4

3. Questiona) “Adversely effect” , yesb) Absence of alternative solutions, yes (extension!)c) “Imperative reasons of overriding public interest” ?

EU Commission’s guidance, page 43:

„Thus, projects that lie entirely in the interest of companies or individuals would not be considered to be covered.”Security of energy supply = public interest

4. Question A condition to the permit is better than refusal.

Page 5: Case Study on interaction between the EIA and the Habitas Directive Comments to the solution Workshop in Trier, 17 – 19 March 2014 1

Workshop in Trier, 17 – 19 March 2014

5

5. QuestionProcedural autonomy of the Member States (MS)

6. Question Procedural autonomy of the MS. Such a consequence seems

not to be requested by EU law.7. Question - Transboundary effect: See Article 7 EIA Directive- Insufficient EIA:

Case C-72/12, Altrip, 7 November 2013 Challenge of a irregularly carried out EIA cannot be

excluded

Page 6: Case Study on interaction between the EIA and the Habitas Directive Comments to the solution Workshop in Trier, 17 – 19 March 2014 1

Workshop in Trier, 17 – 19 March 2014

6

Condition of causality permissible But: Burden of proof (of a casual link) must not fall on

the applicant

8. Question The NGO has no damage

9. Question - Judicial restraint? - Procedural autonomy of the MS? - Problematic!

10. Question The answer depends on the solution according to the national

law