case study non-structural mitigation in turkey studies/disasters/cs-turkey.pdf · for every...

2
The intervention Based on the results of this study and the low level of risk awareness among people hit by the 1999 quakes, the university developed a non-structural mitigation (NSM) education programme, with support from TRCS and ARC. The programme aims to promote a nation- wide culture of mitigation, by providing people with basic information on earthquake risk, demonstrating how to secure potentially dangerous objects in homes, schools or workplaces, and outlining key safety actions in the event of disaster. Key to the programme’s success are its collaborative spirit and its basis in sound research and development: The partnership merged the scientific and technical expertise of Bogazici University with the Red Cross Red Crescent network’s ability to disseminate critical safety information to exposed communities. To ensure the accuracy of their advice, team members conducted laboratory tests using a ‘shake table’ to val- idate both techniques and the quality of materials available commercially across Turkey. Based on the results, the team developed recommendations for how people can most effectively reduce their non- structural earthquake risk. The university invited Turkish product manufacturers to observe the laboratory tests, to encourage the pro- duction of inexpensive and user-friendly devices for NSM (e.g. door latches, L-shaped securing brackets). The university developed, tested and refined a variety of training aids, including CD-ROMs, table-top models, display cases with sample NSM materials and presentation charts. With key safety messages identified (see Steps you can take today, below), the university and TRCS produced a training of trainers (ToT) programme to develop a cadre of community instructors across the country. In June 2003, the programme was tested on 26 TRCS staff mem- bers in the Marmara region, who were asked to apply NSM measures in their own homes and work places. Once the ToT programme has been thoroughly tested, TRCS and Bogazici University plans to extend training to 800 trainers who have been working in Community Education Centers of the Ministry of Education – one for every district in Turkey. The eventual aim is to collab- orate with the Ministry of Education to introduce the NSM programme into the school system nationwide. Case study Turkey’s high vulnerability to earthquakes is significantly compounded by socio-eco- nomic factors. Following two devastating earthquakes in 1999, the Turkish Red Crescent Society (TRCS), American Red Cross (ARC) and Bogazici University began a series of collaborative activities aimed at community risk reduction. A Bogazici University study concluded that: Of the 18,000 deaths, more than 95 per cent were a result of building collapse while only 3 per cent were due to non- structural causes. Of the 50,000 injuries, 50 per cent were a result of non-structural causes. Therefore, up to 25,000 injuries could have been prevented by taking basic preparedness measures at the household level – such as securing furniture and other heavy, tall objects likely to fall on people. If people employ simple, preventative measures in future, the drain on limited medical resources and associated economic losses would be dramatically reduced. ki r á ki é svos os r í r r R dhos á Meg í g g á sos í í í G Bozcaada Kirklareli Zonguldak Bursa Balikesir Manisa Aydin rta Isparta nya Kony Karaman n Adana na Ad Ad akya Anta ak niye Osmaniye Osm Gaziantep e e e anliurfa Kilis K K Sivas vas Ni de Aska karay aray a Nev v ehir eri Kayser Kir Kir ehir e h Yozgat Y Ç nkiri ankiri k Kastamonu m Sinop S Samsun Ordu Giresun Gires sun G ü ü≈ ü≈ hane e h Trabzon Rize A Ardahan ah Kars K Erzurum B Bayburt ybu Mu Mardin Siirt Van A ri I I I dir dir i ri Bing ö l Bitlis Bitlis Diyarbakir Diya Diya a a Tune neceli eceli e Erzincan Amasya sya Tokat kat kat Ç Ç ale Kirikkale ale a Mers sin Antalya Antalya Antalya Denizli Burdur d d Afyon Mu la la U U K ü tahya tah Bolu Bartin t Karab ra Kar ü k Bilecik Bilecik k k ki Eski ehir e Edirne E E ne Izmir mir ANKAR RA YE LEFKO EFKOSIA KOSIA KOSIA EF EFKO NICOSIA ICOSIA NICOSIA C I B o a zi MEDITERRANEAN SEA EA BLACK SEA NORTHERN CYPRUS Occupied by Turkey and claimed by Cyprus IRAQ SYRIA I RI RU CYPRUS RUS RUS U U BULGARIA IRAN GREECE GEORGIA k (hig 1st degree risk (high k (highest level) l) k (high 2nd degree risk 3rd degree risk 4th degree risk 5th degree risk Technical expertise social mobilization community effectiveness Turkey regional earthquake risk map Source: Disaster Research Directorate, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement Non-structural mitigation in Turkey Steps you can take today! Secure heavy furniture Move heavy items to lower shelves Secure gas appliances and important electronic equipment Latch cabinet doors Secure light fixtures Keep beds away from windows

Upload: others

Post on 17-Jun-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case study Non-structural mitigation in Turkey studies/Disasters/cs-turkey.pdf · for every district in Turkey. The eventual aim is to collab-orate with the Ministry of Education

The interventionBased on the results of this study and the low level ofrisk awareness among people hit by the 1999 quakes,the university developed a non-structural mitigation(NSM) education programme, with support from TRCSand ARC. The programme aims to promote a nation-wide culture of mitigation, by providing people withbasic information on earthquake risk, demonstratinghow to secure potentially dangerous objects in homes,schools or workplaces, and outlining key safety actionsin the event of disaster. Key to the programme’s successare its collaborative spirit and its basis in sound researchand development: ■ The partnership merged the scientific and technical

expertise of Bogazici University with the Red CrossRed Crescent network’s ability to disseminate criticalsafety information to exposed communities.

■ To ensure the accuracy of their advice, team membersconducted laboratory tests using a ‘shake table’ to val-idate both techniques and the quality of materialsavailable commercially across Turkey. Based on theresults, the team developed recommendations forhow people can most effectively reduce their non-structural earthquake risk.

■ The university invited Turkish product manufacturersto observe the laboratory tests, to encourage the pro-duction of inexpensive and user-friendly devices forNSM (e.g. door latches, L-shaped securing brackets).

■ The university developed, tested and refined a varietyof training aids, including CD-ROMs, table-topmodels, display cases with sample NSM materials andpresentation charts.

With key safety messages identified (see Steps you cantake today, below), the university and TRCS produced atraining of trainers (ToT) programme to develop a cadreof community instructors across the country. In June2003, the programme was tested on 26 TRCS staff mem-bers in the Marmara region, who were asked to applyNSM measures in their own homes and work places.Once the ToT programme has been thoroughly tested,TRCS and Bogazici University plans to extend trainingto 800 trainers who have been working in CommunityEducation Centers of the Ministry of Education – onefor every district in Turkey. The eventual aim is to collab-orate with the Ministry of Education to introduce theNSM programme into the school system nationwide.

Cas

e stu

dy

Turkey’s high vulnerability to earthquakes issignificantly compounded by socio-eco-nomic factors. Following two devastatingearthquakes in 1999, the Turkish RedCrescent Society (TRCS), American RedCross (ARC) and Bogazici University begana series of collaborative activities aimed atcommunity risk reduction. A BogaziciUniversity study concluded that:■ Of the 18,000 deaths, more than 95 per

cent were a result of building collapsewhile only 3 per cent were due to non-structural causes.

■ Of the 50,000 injuries, 50 per cent werea result of non-structural causes.

Therefore, up to 25,000 injuries could havebeen prevented by taking basic preparedness measures at the household level – such as securing furniture and otherheavy, tall objects likely to fall on people. If people employ simple, preventative measures in future, the drain on limited medical resources and associated economic losses would be dramatically reduced.

áki

ráki

Lésvos

os

rírr aíí

Ródhos

Megígg stiíí

Kásos

ímiíí

G

Bozcaada

Kirklareli

‘‘‘

Zonguldak

Bursa

Balikesir

Manisa

Aydin

rtaIsparta nyaKony

KaramannAdananaAdAd

akyaAntaak

niyeOsmaniyeOsm Gaziantepeee⁄anliurfa

KilisKK

≈≈≈

Sivasvas

Ni‘de

Askakarayaraya

Nevv≈≈ehir eriKayser

KirKir ehireh

YozgatY

ÇÇ nkiriankirik

Kastamonum

SinopS

Samsun

Ordu

GiresunGiressun

Gü ü≈ü≈haneeh

Trabzon RizeAArdahanah

KarsK

Erzurum

BBayburtybu

Mu≈

Mardin

Siirt

Van

A‘ri

III‘‘dirdiri

ri

Bingöl

BitlisBitlis

DiyarbakirDiyaDiya aa

Tuneneceliecelie

‘‘‘‘

Erzincan

Amasyasya

Tokatkatkat

ÇÇ

aleKirikkalealea

Merssin

AntalyaAntalyaAntalya

Denizli

Burdurdd

Afyon

Mu‘‘lala

UU≈

Kütahyatah

Bolu

Bartint

KarabraKar ük

BilecikBilecikkk

kiEski≈≈ehire

EdirneEE ne

Izmirmir

ANKARRAYE

LEFKOEFKOSIAKOSIA KOSIAEFEFKONICOSIAICOSIANICOSIAC

I

Bo≈a

zi

M E D I T E R R A N E A N S E A

EA

B L A C K S E A

NORTHERN CYPRUS Occupied by Turkey

and claimed by Cyprus

IRAQ

S Y R I AIR I

RUCYPRUSRUSRUSUU

B U L G A R I A

IRA

N

GREECE

GEORGIA

k (hig1st degree risk (highk (highest level)l)k (high2nd degree risk3rd degree risk4th degree risk5th degree risk

Technical expertise social mobilization community effectiveness

Turkey regional earthquake risk mapSource: Disaster Research Directorate, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement

Non-structural mitigation in Turkey

Steps you can take today!

Secure heavy furniture

Move heavy items to lower shelves

Secure gas appliances and important electronic equipment

Latch cabinet doors Secure light fixtures Keep beds away from windows

Page 2: Case study Non-structural mitigation in Turkey studies/Disasters/cs-turkey.pdf · for every district in Turkey. The eventual aim is to collab-orate with the Ministry of Education

Changes stimulated by the experience

Following the trial training programme: ■ The TRCS has begun to develop a 3-year plan for

community-based NSM education programmes.■ TRCS branch representatives have recommended

options to implement and expand the programmes,especially ways to utilize volunteer resources.

■ A web-based tool was created to share experiencesamong community disaster education trainers andsupporters.

■ TRCS are planning to apply NSM in its headquar-ters, branches, blood centres, health clinics, retire-ment homes and warehouses, especially in high-riskareas. This will develop local communities’ disasterpreparedness capacity, improve technical familiarityamong TRCS staff and strengthen TRCS’ disasterresponse capacity.

Issues that still need to be addressed include:■ Application of NSM in rented houses and offices – a

challenge, since owners and renters have differentincentives to make NSM changes.

■ Application of NSM in public facilities such as hospi-tals, health clinics, schools and public offices, and inthe homes of vulnerable communities.

■ Reluctance of people to make NSM modificationsdue to concerns about aesthetics or the ability tomove furniture easily for cleaning and maintenance.

Implications for the role of the Red Cross Red Crescent, government and universities

■ Various Turkish organizations (some with interna-tional support) are implementing disparate types ofcommunity-based disaster training. It is vitallyimportant to ensure that risk reduction messages arestandardized and consistent. The Red Cross RedCrescent National Societies could seek to promoteconsensus among different actors on this issue.

■ The Turkish government could provide moreresources and technical leadership to ensure thatNSM training becomes an obligatory part of the edu-cational syllabus for architects, engineers and builders– as well as for public servants in risk-prone areas.This should be in addition to ongoing efforts todevelop and enforce appropriate building codes.

■ The programme highlights the important role ofresearch and development in validating informationresulting from laboratory tests and lessons learnedfrom earthquakes. Turkish universities could play amore proactive role in embracing NSM within theircourses and collaborating in the research and devel-opment of NSM measures.

Conclusion and recommendations■ NSM provides a critical set of first steps towards risk

reduction that ordinary people can begin applyingtoday.

■ Governments, universities and Red Cross RedCrescent National Societies need to collaborate andcombine their strengths. Each has a unique role toplay.

■ In Turkey there is tremendous diversity in types ofbuilding and lifestyles, especially between urban andrural areas and between different regions. These factors must be considered when creating targeted training materials for specific audiences and whenresearching and further refining NSM education programmes.

■ It is critical that universities and related institutionscontinue to conduct research to strengthen and develop the training and educational aspects of NSM.TRCS, universities and other partners should continue evaluations to ensure that materials are easily understandable and appropriate for dissemina-tion to the general public.

For more information on the NSM project, please contact:Turkish Red

Crescent SocietyAtaç-1 Sokak No:32

Yenisehir/AnkaraTurkey

Tel: +90 312 430 23 00Fax: +90 312 430 01 75E-mail: [email protected]: www.kizilay.org.tr

Bogazici UniversityKandilli Observatory and

Earthquake Research InstituteDisaster Preparedness

Education ProjectCengelköy 81220, Istanbul, TurkeyTel: + 90 216 308 05 11 #345

Fax: + 90 216 332 90 94E-mail: [email protected]

Web: www.iahep.org

American Red Cross2025 E Street NW

Washington, DC 20006 USA

Tel: +1 202 303 5279Fax: +1 202 303 0051

E-mail: [email protected]: www.redcross.org

International Federationof Red Cross and Red

Crescent SocietiesP.O. Box 372

CH-1211 Geneva 19Switzerland

E-mail: [email protected] site: www.ifrc.org

Bogazici University researchers use a shake table to simulate an earthquake and to identify bestpractices for NSM.

The

map

s us

ed d

o no

t im

ply

the

expr

essi

on o

f any

opi

nion

on

the

part

of th

e In

tern

atio

nal F

eder

atio

n of

Red

Cro

ss a

nd R

ed C

resc

ent

Soci

etie

s or

Nat

iona

l Soc

ietie

s co

ncer

ning

the

lega

l sta

tus

of a

terr

itory

or

of it

s au

thor

ities

.52

600

11/

2003

E

500