case study analysis
TRANSCRIPT
Xerox Corporation
Surviving the Competitive Crisis
Summary
The Xerox Corporation with headquarters in Stamford, Connecticut was founded in 1906 in Rochester, New York as the Haloid Company, a manufacturer of photographic paper. In 1947, the Haloid Company obtained the license to Chester Carlson's basic xerographic patents from the Battelle Development Corporation of Columbus, Ohio.
Summary
In 1961, the company name was changed to the Xerox Corporation and was listed on the New York stock exchange. The Xerox Corporation expanded operations and grew from $176 million in 1963 to $4 billion in sales by 1975.
Summary
From the mid-1960s to the mid-1970, Xerox revenues grew at an average annual rate of about 23 percent per year and profits increased at an average rate of about 20 percent. Between the mid-1970s and 1980, revenue and profit growth slipped to an average annual rate of about 16 and 14 percent, respectively.
Summary
From 1981 to 1983, revenues flattened and net income fell 17 percent below 1980 levels. ROA fell from 19 percent in 1980 to 8.4 percent in 1983.
Statement of the Problem
The purpose of this analysis is to study the following critical areas of the corporation:
Design of the product, Production process, Inventory and personnel management, Supplier relations, Marketing functions
Objectives
Construct SWOT analysis for the case studyIdentify the strength and weaknesses of the corporation to supply plan of actionsDeploy strategies to help eliminate the existing problem identified Optimum product design through defined plans of action
Areas Consideration
STRENGTHS
1. Ph.D. Degree holders2. Above-average income earners3. Pioneers
WEAKNESSES
1. Young, idealistic, and aggressive2. Technically- rather than management-
oriented3. Volatile industries
OPPORTUNITIES
1. Market demands2. Technological Innovations3. Related industries
STRENGTH
1. Competitors2. Economy3. Government
Strengths – Opportunities Strategies
Have higher chances on increased research activitiesSufficient funding for research activities and commercializationEstablished prestige
Weaknesses – Opportunities Strategies
Low-cost productsEfficient transactionsCreation of new industries
Threats – Strengths Strategies
Alliances/MergersGovernment support/subsidiesDeregulation
Weaknesses – ThreatsStrategies
Continued and sustained development and growthInnovative strategiesIntegration with government projects
Alternative Course of Action
Quality: Continuous improvement on features of products and services.
Advantages: Increased room for improvements; Affordable and increased client satisfaction.
Disadvantages: Higher initial capital outlay; Long-term return-on-assets
Management: Intensive trainings to all officers and members of the hierarchy.
Advantages: Increased room for improvements; Affordable and increased client satisfaction.
Disadvantages: Higher initial capital outlay; Long-term return-on-assets
Alternative Course of Action
Market: Penetrate the world's leading industries.
Advantages: Increased room for improvements; Affordable and increased client satisfaction.
Disadvantages: Higher initial capital outlay; Long-term return-on-assets
Alternative Course of Action
Conclusion
For the past years Xerox has been changing the company in most of its critical aspects to improve quality. They have focused on one strategy- concentrating on productivity and
management capabilities; on the other hand, the marketing aspects were
neglected. Hence significantly the midcourse corrections will move toward a goal of
becoming the most productive company in the industry. In the kind of their industry,
quality was a race without finish line.
Recommendation
(Quality) Continuous improvement on features of products and services.
Plan of Action
Tie up with related industries and government agenciesDevelopment of technological tools and devices Explore unknown areas of interestRegular reviews of documentations and facilities improvementsIncrease satellite offices worldwide