case 2:17-cr-20465-dph-rsw ecf no. 173 filed 10/30/17

29
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V Case No. 17-20465 ABDUL HAQ - D- 4 Defendant. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _/ PLEA HEARING BEFORE CHIEF JUDGE DENISE PAGE HOOD U.S. DISTRICT COURT 231 W. LAFAYETTE STREET, COURTROOM 730 DETROIT, MICHIGAN TUESDAY, OCTOBER 3, 2017 APPEARANCES: FOR THE GOVERNMENT: JACOB FOSTER, SHANKAR RAMAMURTHY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 211 W. FORT ST., SUITE 2001 DETROIT, MI 48226 FOR THE DEFENDANT: KHALID A. KAHLOON, 600 WEST MAIN STREET SUITE 500 LOUISVILLE, KY 40202 Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1337 Page 1 of 29

Upload: others

Post on 01-May-2022

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

V Case No. 17-20465

ABDUL HAQ - D- 4

Defendant.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _/

PLEA HEARING

BEFORE CHIEF JUDGE DENISE PAGE HOOD

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

231 W. LAFAYETTE STREET, COURTROOM 730

DETROIT, MICHIGAN

TUESDAY, OCTOBER 3, 2017

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE GOVERNMENT: JACOB FOSTER,

SHANKAR RAMAMURTHY,

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

211 W. FORT ST.,

SUITE 2001

DETROIT, MI 48226

FOR THE DEFENDANT: KHALID A. KAHLOON,

600 WEST MAIN STREET

SUITE 500

LOUISVILLE, KY 40202

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1337 Page 1 of 29

Page 2: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

2

I N D E X PAGE

PLEA HEARING 3

E X H I B I T S

GOVERNMENT'S 4 RULE 11 PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1338 Page 2 of 29

Page 3: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

3

Tuesday, October 3, 2017

Detroit, Michigan

At approximately 4:00 p.m.

THE CLERK: The Court calls case number

17-20465, United States of America versus Abdul Haq.

Will Counsel please identify themselves for the record.

MR. FOSTER: Good afternoon, Your Honor.

Jacob Foster on behalf of the United States.

THE COURT: Good afternoon.

MR. RAMAMURTHY: Shankar Ramamurthy on

behalf of the United States on issues of forfeiture.

MR. KAHLOON: Good afternoon, Your Honor.

Khalid Kahloon representing Dr. Haq.

THE COURT: Good afternoon to everyone.

And is it Dr. Haq?

MR. KAHLOON: Yes, Ma'am.

THE COURT: And we're here for him to enter

a plea of guilty; is that right?

MR. KAHLOON: That is correct.

THE COURT: And is that your understanding,

too?

MR. FOSTER: Yes, Your Honor.

THE COURT: And I have a Rule 11 Plea

Agreement that's an advanced copy; is that correct?

MR. FOSTER: Yes, Your Honor. I have the

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1339 Page 3 of 29

Page 4: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

4

originals to tender.

THE COURT: So turn to pages 16 and 17 of

the originals and tell me if there are dates on those

pages?

MR. FOSTER: Yes, Your Honor.

THE COURT: There are on 16 and 17?

MR. FOSTER: Yes.

THE COURT: Very good.

You can come to the podium if you would.

And Dr. Haq, are you here to plead guilty?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And can I issue, Counsel, the

standard oath?

MR. KAHLOON: Yes, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Please raise your right hand.

(Whereupon the Defendant was sworn by the

Court to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but

the truth.)

THE DEFENDANT: I do.

THE COURT: Thank you.

I'm going to ask you some questions about

the facts alleged in the Indictment and any answers you

may give may be used again you in a future prosecution

for perjury or false statement; do you understand that?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1340 Page 4 of 29

Page 5: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

5

THE COURT: And what is your name for the

record?

THE DEFENDANT: Abdul Haq.

THE COURT: And do you understand you have a

constitutional right to remain silent and not

incriminate yourself?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And do you wish to give up that

right for the purpose of pleading guilty?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And I'm going to ask you a set

of questions, I ask them of everyone, okay?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: How old are you, sir?

THE DEFENDANT: I'm 71.

THE COURT: And how far did you go in

school?

THE DEFENDANT: What?

THE COURT: How far did you go in school?

THE DEFENDANT: I graduated in '69 and then

came here for my residency.

THE COURT: And when you say residency, you

mean residency --

THE DEFENDANT: Training. Residency

training.

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1341 Page 5 of 29

Page 6: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

6

THE COURT: In what area?

THE DEFENDANT: Pediatrics.

THE COURT: I'm sorry?

THE DEFENDANT: Pediatrics.

THE COURT: And when you say you graduated

in '69, was that from medical school?

THE DEFENDANT: From medical school.

THE COURT: And what medical school was it?

THE DEFENDANT: It was King Edward Medical

College, Lahore, Pakistan.

THE COURT: And let me ask you this, are you

able to read, write and understand English?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And did you have a chance to

read through the Indictment against you?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And were you also able to read

through the Rule 11 Plea Agreement?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And today did you take any

medication?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes, blood pressure

medication.

THE COURT: Does it impact your ability to

think and reason?

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1342 Page 6 of 29

Page 7: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

7

THE DEFENDANT: No, I don't think so.

THE COURT: And did you take it today as you

usually take it?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And did you use any drugs or

alcohol today?

THE DEFENDANT: No.

THE COURT: Do you understand you have a

right to have an attorney with you at every stage of the

proceedings and if you cannot afford one, I would

appoint one for you at no cost to you.

THE DEFENDANT: Yes, I have attorney.

THE COURT: You have your attorney with you

today?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And has he been your attorney

throughout these proceedings?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: Were you the attorney at the

arraignment?

MR. KAHLOON: No, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Who was at arraignment?

THE DEFENDANT: Paul Stablein.

MR. KAHLOON: I substituted in, Your Honor.

He was the attorney at the arraignment.

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1343 Page 7 of 29

Page 8: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

8

MR. FOSTER: Paul Stablein, Your Honor.

THE COURT: And then you were hired

separately, is it Mr. Kahloon?

MR. KAHLOON: Yes, Ma'am.

THE COURT: And when did you first appear in

the case?

MR. KAHLOON: Your Honor, I filed an

appearance probably a couple months ago. In July.

THE COURT: After the arraignment?

MR. KAHLOON: That's correct, Your Honor.

THE COURT: And did Mr. Kahloon represent

you during the negotiations of the plea agreement?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And are you satisfied with his

advice and services so far?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: Did you talk about pleading

guilty with him?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And did he go over the Rule 11

Plea Agreement with you?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And are you satisfied -- well,

did he explain your constitutional rights to you?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1344 Page 8 of 29

Page 9: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

9

THE COURT: I'm going to explain those

rights again and if you have any questions, this is the

time to ask those questions, okay.

THE DEFENDANT: All right.

THE COURT: Do you understand you have a

constitutional right to plead not guilty and to have a

trial?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And do you understand you will

give up that rights if you plead guilty?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And do you understand that you

could have a trial before a jury?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And do you know what a jury is?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And do you understand that

you're presumed to be innocent until you're proven

otherwise?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: Do you understand that the

Government has the burden of proving your guilt beyond a

reasonable doubt?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And do you understand that means

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1345 Page 9 of 29

Page 10: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10

that you have the right to have their witnesses come

into open court and testify in open court against you?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And do you understand you and

your attorney could cross exam or question anybody that

was called by the Government as a witness?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes, Your Honor.

THE COURT: And do you understand that if

you wanted to you could present your own witnesses at

trial?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And do you understand if they

would not voluntarily appear that I would order them to

court for you?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And do you also understand that

you have the right to remain silent during your trial?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And do you understand your

silence could not be used against you by the Judge or by

the jury?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And likewise do you understand

that if you wanted to testify, we would give you a

chance to testify in open court?

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1346 Page 10 of 29

Page 11: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And do you understand you will

give up all those rights if you plead guilty?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And you're going to plead guilty

to Count 1 of the Indictment which is Conspiracy to

Commit Health Care Fraud?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And do you understand that

carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a

maximum fine of $250,000 or twice the gain or loss?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And Count 1 is a conspiracy to

commit health care fraud against the Medicare program;

is that correct?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And this Indictment alleges

that, and I'm going to start on page 10, and it alleges

that you operated an operation called Global Quality

Aqua Therapy, Tri-County Physicians, Tri-State

Physicians, New Center Medical, National Laboratories

and Tri-County Wellness collectively referred to as

Tri-County Network.

And in Count 1, which is the conspiracy, it

alleges that from 2008 and continuing through the date

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1347 Page 11 of 29

Page 12: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

12

of the Indictment that you along with others did

willfully and knowingly conspire, combine, confederate

and agree with each other and others known and unknown

to the grand jury including Home Health Agency Owner 1,

Diagnostic Company 1 and Physician 1 to commit certain

offense against the United States; namely, to knowingly

and willfully execute a scheme and artifice to defraud a

health care benefit program affecting commerce, that

being the Medicare program. And to obtain by means of

materially false and fraudulent pretenses,

representations and promises, money and property owned

by and under the control and custody of said health care

benefit program in connection with the delivery of and

payment for health care benefits, terms and services, in

violation of federal law.

Is that a sufficient statement of the

offense?

MR. FOSTER: It is, Your Honor. Just to

correct one thing. It's the Defendant Mashiyat Rashid

who owns and operates the clinics that you listed.

Dr. Haq, on page 10, at paragraph 30, he was

a physician who was enrolled as a participating provider

for Aqua Therapy, Tri-County Physicians --

THE COURT: I'm sorry. It is in paragraph

30, which I intended to read 27, 28, 29 and 30, but I

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1348 Page 12 of 29

Page 13: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

13

thought I could just read 27. But 30 alleges that he

was a physician licensed in the state of Michigan,

enrolled as a participating provider with Medicare for

Aqua Therapy, Tri-County Physicians and Tri-State

Physicians which are part of the Tri-County Network

organization; is that correct?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: Is that now a sufficient reading

of the claims against him?

MR. FOSTER: Yes, Your Honor. And including

by reference Part C of the Rule 11 which begins on page

2.

THE COURT: And I would also note that he is

also specifically mentioned in paragraphs 46, 47 and 48

of the -- and 51 of the Indictment; is that correct?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: Those are all the paragraphs I

think he is mentioned in in Count 1 Counsel, do you

agree?

MR. FOSTER: And 52, 56 and 57 as well, Your

Honor.

THE COURT: And those are all related to

Count 1?

MR. FOSTER: Yes.

THE COURT: Do you want me to read them,

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1349 Page 13 of 29

Page 14: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

14

Counsel?

MR. KAHLOON: No, Your Honor.

THE COURT: How about you, Dr. Haq, would

you like me to read those specific paragraphs?

THE DEFENDANT: No, Your Honor.

THE COURT: And you, as I indicated,

understand that the maximum penalty is 10 years in

prison and the maximum fine is $250,000?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes, I understand, Your

Honor.

THE COURT: Are you on probation, parole or

do you have any other inmate status?

THE DEFENDANT: I'm on probation for my

license.

THE COURT: You're on probation for your

license. Is that through the licensing agency, not

through a court?

THE DEFENDANT: Licensing agency, not

through a court.

THE COURT: And let's hear the pertinent

parts of the Rule 11 Plea Agreement, Counsel.

MR. FOSTER: Yes, Your Honor. The

Defendant, as you indicated, will enter a plea of guilty

to Count 1 of the Indictment.

There are no sentencing guidelines disputes.

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1350 Page 14 of 29

Page 15: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

15

The Defendant's guideline range is 97 to 121 months

except if the Court finds that the Defendant's Criminal

History Category is higher than reflected on the

attached worksheet or the offense level should be higher

because after pleading guilty Defendant made a false

statement, Section 3 of the Rule 11 provides that the

Court will impose a sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

Section 3553 and in doing so must consider the

sentencing guideline range.

In terms of imprisonment, the sentence in

this case may not exceed the top of the sentencing

guideline range recommended by the Government as

previously described.

In terms of supervised release, there is no

agreement on supervised release.

In terms of special assessment, the

Defendant will pay a special assessment of $100.00.

Fine, as the Court previously indicated, the

Court may impose a fine in any amount up to $250,000 or

twice the pecuniary gain or loss.

The parties agree on restitution that the

Court shall order restitution to the U.S. Department of

Health and Human Services in the amount of

$6,927,046.12.

Forfeiture, the Defendant has agreed to

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1351 Page 15 of 29

Page 16: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

16

forfeit to the United States his interest in all

property real or personal which constitutes or is

derived directly or indirectly from gross proceeds

traceable to the conspiracy alleged in Count 1 of the

Indictment.

He also agrees to forfeit all funds subject

to civil forfeiture, has property involved in or

traceable to property involved in money laundering.

And there are specific items of forfeiture

that the Defendant has agreed to which are all funds on

deposit and all other items of value in the University

Bank Islamic Profit Sharing account number 1083155;

All funds on deposit and all other items of

value in Wells Fargo Advisors account number 3282-3501;

All funds on deposit and all other items of

value in the Wells Fargo Advisors account number

37164947;

And all funds on deposit and all other items

of value in Wells Fargo Advisors account number

4210-8906.

And the Defendant has agreed to a forfeiture

money judgment in the amount of $6,927,046.12.

(The following portion ordered sealed by the

Court.)

The Rule 11 Agreement provides for the use

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1352 Page 16 of 29

Page 17: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

17

of a withdrawn guilty plea. If the Court allows the

Defendant to withdraw his guilty plea, the Defendant

waives his rights under Rule 410 and the Government may

use his guilty plea and any statement made under oath at

the plea hearing and the factual basis statement in the

plea agreement against him in any proceeding.

The agreement also provides that the

Defendant understands and acknowledges that as a result

of his plea, the Defendant will be excluded from

Medicare, Medicade and all federal health care programs.

Provision number 7 is the right to withdraw.

The Government may withdraw if the Court finds the

correct guideline range to be different than is

determined by Paragraph 2-B.

The Defendant may withdraw only if the Court

decides to impose a sentence higher than the maximum

allowed by Part 3 of the agreement.

Section 8 of the agreement is an appellate

waiver. The Defendant waives any right he may have to

appeal his conviction on any grounds.

Clause 9 are the consequences of withdrawal

of the guilty plea. The Defendant is allowed to

withdraw his guilty plea or if any conviction entered

pursuant to this agreement is vacated, the Court shall

on the Government's request reinstate any charges that

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1353 Page 17 of 29

Page 18: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18

were dismissed as part of the agreement.

In terms of the parties, the agreement does

not bind any agency except the United States Department

of Justice, Fraud Section, and the U.S. Attorney's

Office for the Eastern District of Michigan.

(The following portion ordered sealed by the

Court.)

THE COURT: Is there any part, Mr. Kahloon,

of the written Rule 11 Plea Agreement that has not been

read that you would like to be part of the oral record?

MR. KAHLOON: No, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Dr. Haq, is that your agreement

with the Government?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: Can I see the signature pages

that are complete? Is it marked as an exhibit?

MR. FOSTER: It is marked as Government's

Exhibit D-4.

THE COURT: That's fine. You may bring it

up.

Is that your agreement with the Government?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: Has anyone on behalf of the

Government, either the Government's attorney or any

agent or anyone else promised you anything else?

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1354 Page 18 of 29

Page 19: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

19

THE DEFENDANT: No.

THE COURT: Has anyone on behalf of your

defense counsel promised you anything other than what is

included in the Rule 11 Plea Agreement?

THE DEFENDANT: No.

THE COURT: And has anyone forced or

threatened you to get you to plead guilty?

THE DEFENDANT: No.

THE COURT: Has anyone forced or threatened

anyone close to you to get you to plead guilty?

THE DEFENDANT: No.

THE COURT: And are you pleading guilty

freely and voluntarily?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: So let's see, on page 17, is

that your signature?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And Mr. Kahloon, is that your

signature also?

MR. KAHLOON: Yes, Your Honor.

THE COURT: And let's see, Mr. Foster, is

that your signature?

MR. FOSTER: Yes, Your Honor.

THE COURT: And do you know that to be the

signature of Ms. Dubal and Mr. Pratt?

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1355 Page 19 of 29

Page 20: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

20

MR. FOSTER: Yes, I do, and those are their

signatures.

THE COURT: So you can tell me, I suppose

you have the authority to fully put the date on here,

right?

MR. FOSTER: Yes, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Would you do that for me,

please.

MR. FOSTER: Sure.

May I approach?

THE COURT: Yes.

I would also note -- are there signatures on

the other agreement?

MR. FOSTER: Yes, Your Honor.

(The following portion ordered sealed by the

Court.)

Are there signatures on that one that you

have down there?

MR. FOSTER: Yes, there are.

THE DEFENDANT: Yes, my signature.

THE COURT: And you know those to be the

Government's signatures; is that correct?

MR. FOSTER: Yes, that is correct.

THE COURT: And that agreement I'm ordering

to be sealed and the portion of the record pertaining to

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1356 Page 20 of 29

Page 21: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

21

it also are sealed, okay.

At the request of the Government; is that

agreeable to you?

MR. KAHLOON: Of course.

THE COURT: And it does not reflect any

specific amount of reduction; is that correct?

MR. KAHLOON: That is correct, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Mr. Foster, I would also note

that the Rule 11 Plea Agreement provides for notes that

the guideline range for this is 97 to 121 months. And I

can assure you that the Probation Department -- is that

right, on page?

MR. FOSTER: That is correct, Your Honor.

THE COURT: And I'm sure that the Probation

Department is going to tell us that the guideline range

will be 97 to 120 months because the maximum penalty is

10 years in prison; is that right?

MR. FOSTER: That is correct, Your Honor.

THE COURT: You all understand that as well?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: So your agreement not to exceed

the top of the guidelines the Court would take as an

agreement not to exceed 120 months.

MR. FOSTER: Yes, that's correct, Your

Honor.

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1357 Page 21 of 29

Page 22: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

22

THE COURT: Very good.

Are you satisfied I have complied with the

rule so far, Mr. Kahloon?

MR. KAHLOON: Yes, Your Honor.

THE COURT: What about you, Mr. Foster?

MR. FOSTER: Yes, I am, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Dr. Haq, what did you do to be

guilty?

MR. KAHLOON: Your Honor, could you repeat

your question.

THE COURT: What did you do to be guilty of

conspiracy to commit health care fraud in Count 1 of the

Indictment?

THE DEFENDANT: Work in the payment in the

clinic under Mas administered pain medicines which were

not really indicated. And also pain injections which

were really not indicated. So that's the main work

which was done by me.

THE COURT: And then did you bill Medicare

for them?

THE DEFENDANT: Yeah. The owner of the

clinic at Tri-County he was the one who was the --

managing the business. And so he billed and we got

whatever agreement we had between us.

THE COURT: And were the people involved the

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1358 Page 22 of 29

Page 23: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

23

people that are noted in the Indictment?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: And when did this happen?

THE DEFENDANT: This happened, actually had

been happening since 2008 with the Aqua Therapy and then

the Tri-County Physicians opened.

THE COURT: And so that was from sometime in

2008 until sometime in 2017?

THE DEFENDANT: Right. Up to, yeah.

THE COURT: Up to the date of the

Indictment?

THE DEFENDANT: Just before, because I left

the -- that group in January.

THE COURT: And where did this occur?

THE DEFENDANT: It occurred initially at

3800 Woodward Avenue and then it was the office changed

to West Grand Boulevard. I think the address is 3011

West Grand Blvd., Room 305.

THE COURT: And that all would be in the

City of Detroit?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: Turn to page 3 of the Rule 11

Plea Agreement, please. And you'll see there a

paragraph -- I'm sorry, turn to page 2. You'll see a

paragraph that says, Factual Basis for Guilty Plea, and

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1359 Page 23 of 29

Page 24: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

24

it continues over until I believe page 5. And would you

read that to yourself because then I'm going to ask you

some questions about it.

No, no, just read it to yourself.

(Whereupon the Defendant reviews the

document.)

THE DEFENDANT: Yes, Your Honor, I read

that.

THE COURT: Is that an accurate factual

basis for your involvement in this conspiracy?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Are you satisfied, Counsel, or

do you have any questions, Mr. Foster?

MR. FOSTER: I'm satisfied.

THE COURT: Counsel, are you satisfied?

MR. KAHLOON: Yes, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Then I find that Dr. Haq's plea

is freely and voluntarily made, that he understands his

constitutional rights and has made out the elements of

the offense in open court and also accepts the factual

basis of the Rule 11 Plea Agreement. And therefore, I

will accept his plea of guilty and the Rule 11 Plea

Agreement.

You understand that the Rule 11 Plea

Agreement also contains that forfeiture information that

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1360 Page 24 of 29

Page 25: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

25

is listed on page --

MR. KAHLOON: Eight.

THE COURT: And continued on 9, 10 and 11, I

believe. Do you understand that, Dr. Haq?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

THE COURT: I would note, Counsel, that you

have listed as restitution some $6,927,046.12, but over

here on page 5 you have listed that there were false

submissions of $19,322,846; is that correct?

MR. FOSTER: That is correct.

THE COURT: But you only intend the

restitution of 6 point 9; is that right?

MR. FOSTER: That's correct.

THE COURT: Is the 19 million the loss

amount or is the 6 point 9 going to be the loss amount?

MR. FOSTER: Just one second, Your Honor.

Yes, the 19 million is the loss amount for

purposes of intended loss or represents the amount

billed to the Medicare program whereas the 6 million --

THE COURT: -- point 9 is the actual amount

paid out by Medicare?

MR. FOSTER: That is correct, Your Honor.

THE COURT: You understand that as well, Mr.

Kahloon?

MR. KAHLOON: We do, Your Honor.

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1361 Page 25 of 29

Page 26: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

THE COURT: And Dr. Haq, do you understand

that also?

THE DEFENDANT: Yes, Your Honor.

THE COURT: And you all don't dispute those

amounts?

THE DEFENDANT: No.

THE COURT: Very well, then I'm accepting

his plea of guilty and the Rule 11 Plea Agreement and

let's set it for a sentencing.

THE CLERK: May 24th, 2018 at 2 p.m.

THE COURT: What day of the week is that?

THE CLERK: That is a Thursday.

THE COURT: At 2 p.m.?

THE CLERK: Yes.

THE COURT: Thank you very much. Anything

else that we need to take up today?

MR. FOSTER: No, Your Honor.

MR. KAHLOON: No.

THE COURT: You're going to submit some kind

of preliminary order of forfeiture or have you already

done that?

MR. RAMAMURTHY: We have not done that, Your

Honor, and we will do that shortly.

THE COURT: Very good.

And your client is on pretrial release; is

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1362 Page 26 of 29

Page 27: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

27

that correct?

MR. KAHLOON: Yes, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Those conditions continue until

the time you appear for sentencing, all right?

THE DEFENDANT: Okay.

THE COURT: And you also will have to be

interviewed for a presentence report by the Probation

Department, and when you're interviewed, your counsel

can go with you, all right?

THE DEFENDANT: Okay. Yes.

THE COURT: Do you have any questions?

THE DEFENDANT: No.

THE COURT: Thank you very much and court's

in recess.

(Proceedings concluded at 4:39 p.m.)

* * * * * * * *

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1363 Page 27 of 29

Page 28: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

28

C E R T I F I C A T I O N

I, CHERYL E. DANIEL, Official Federal Court

Reporter, after being first duly sworn, say that I

stenographically reported the foregoing proceedings held

on the day, date, time and place indicated. That I

caused those stenotype notes to be translated through

Computer Assisted Transcription and that these pages

constitute a true, full and complete transcription of

those stenotype notes to the best of my knowledge and

belief.

I further certify that I am not of counsel

nor have any interest in the foregoing proceedings.

/C/ CHERYL E. DANIEL,

CHERYL E. DANIEL,

FEDERAL OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER

DATED:

Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1364 Page 28 of 29

Page 29: Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

29Case 2:17-cr-20465-DPH-RSW ECF No. 173 filed 10/30/17 PageID.1365 Page 29 of 29