case 1:13-cv-02909-rrm document 61 filed 03/30/14 · pdf filefood safety, fda's center...

19
Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 1of 19 PageiD #: 2049 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------)( UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-02909-RRM N.Y. FISH, INC., a corporation, NEW YORK CITY FISH, INC., a corporation, MAXIM KUTSYK, an individual, PAVEL ROYTKOV, an individual, LEONID STAROSELETSKY, an individual, and STEVEN KOYFMAN, an individual, PROPOSED ORDER OF : PERMANENT INJUNCTION Defendants. --------------------------------------------------------------)( INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, the United States of America, having filed a Complaint for Injunction against N.Y. Fish, Inc., a corporation; New York City Fish, Inc., a corporation; and Maxim Kutsyk, Pavel Roytkov, Leonid Staroseletsky, and Steven Koyfman, individuals (collectively, "Defendants"), a Motion for Preliminary Injunction with a supporting memorandum of law, the declarations of (1) Ronald M. Pace, Director of the New York District Office of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"); (2) Mary E. Losikoff, Consumer Safety Officer, Office of Food Safety, FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition ("CFSAN"); and (3) Christine E. Keys, Microbiologist, CFSAN's Office of Regulatory Science; a reply memorandum in further support of its motion for preliminary injunction; a declaration in advance of trial from Peter M. Trunk, Consumer Safety Officer, Director of FDA's New York District Office; a second declaration in advance of trial from Mary Losikoff; and this Court having considered such documents, all documents filed by Defendants, and the arguments and live testimony at the hearing on July 9 and 10, 2013 consolidating the United States' Motion for Preliminary Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 61 Filed 03/30/14 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: <pageID>

Upload: nguyendien

Post on 05-Mar-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 1of 19 PageiD #: 2049  

 

 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------)( UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

 Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-02909-RRM

 N.Y. FISH, INC., a corporation, NEW YORK CITY FISH, INC., a corporation, MAXIM KUTSYK, an individual, PAVEL ROYTKOV, an individual, LEONID STAROSELETSKY, an individual, and STEVEN KOYFMAN, an individual,

PROPOSED ORDER OF : PERMANENT INJUNCTION

 Defendants.

--------------------------------------------------------------)(  

INTRODUCTION  

Plaintiff, the United States of America, having filed a Complaint for Injunction against

N.Y. Fish, Inc., a corporation; New York City Fish, Inc., a corporation; and Maxim Kutsyk,

Pavel Roytkov, Leonid Staroseletsky, and Steven Koyfman, individuals (collectively,

"Defendants"), a Motion for Preliminary Injunction with a supporting memorandum of law, the

declarations of (1) Ronald M. Pace, Director of the New York District Office of the U.S. Food

and Drug Administration ("FDA"); (2) Mary E. Losikoff, Consumer Safety Officer, Office of

Food Safety, FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition ("CFSAN"); and (3) Christine  

E. Keys, Microbiologist, CFSAN's Office of Regulatory Science; a reply memorandum in further

support of its motion for preliminary injunction; a declaration in advance of trial from Peter M.

Trunk, Consumer Safety Officer, Director of FDA's New York District Office; a second

declaration in advance of trial from Mary Losikoff; and this Court having considered such

documents, all documents filed by Defendants, and the arguments and live testimony at the

hearing on July 9 and 10, 2013 consolidating the United States' Motion for Preliminary

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 61 Filed 03/30/14 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: <pageID>

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 2 of 19 PageID #: 2050Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 61 Filed 03/30/14 Page 2 of 19 PageID #: <pageID>

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 3 of 19 PageID #: 2051Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 61 Filed 03/30/14 Page 3 of 19 PageID #: <pageID>

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 4 of 19 PageID #: 2052Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 61 Filed 03/30/14 Page 4 of 19 PageID #: <pageID>

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 5 of 19 PageID #: 2053Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 61 Filed 03/30/14 Page 5 of 19 PageID #: <pageID>

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 6 of 19 PageID #: 2054Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 61 Filed 03/30/14 Page 6 of 19 PageID #: <pageID>

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 7 of 19 PageID #: 2055Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 61 Filed 03/30/14 Page 7 of 19 PageID #: <pageID>

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 8 of 19 PageID #: 2056Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 61 Filed 03/30/14 Page 8 of 19 PageID #: <pageID>

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 9 of 19 PageID #: 2057Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 61 Filed 03/30/14 Page 9 of 19 PageID #: <pageID>

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 10 of 19 PageID #: 2058Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 61 Filed 03/30/14 Page 10 of 19 PageID #: <pageID>

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 11 of 19 PageID #: 2059Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 61 Filed 03/30/14 Page 11 of 19 PageID #: <pageID>

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 12 of 19 PageID #: 2060Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 61 Filed 03/30/14 Page 12 of 19 PageID #: <pageID>

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 13 of 19 PageID #: 2061Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 61 Filed 03/30/14 Page 13 of 19 PageID #: <pageID>

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 14 of 19 PageID #: 2062Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 61 Filed 03/30/14 Page 14 of 19 PageID #: <pageID>

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 15 of 19 PageID #: 2063Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 61 Filed 03/30/14 Page 15 of 19 PageID #: <pageID>

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 16 of 19 PageID #: 2064Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 61 Filed 03/30/14 Page 16 of 19 PageID #: <pageID>

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 17 of 19 PageID #: 2065Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 61 Filed 03/30/14 Page 17 of 19 PageID #: <pageID>

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 18 of 19 PageID #: 2066Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 61 Filed 03/30/14 Page 18 of 19 PageID #: <pageID>

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 19 of 19 PageiD #: 2067        

may be necessary and appropriate.

SO ORDERED:

Dated this 30th day of March, 2014                                                                                                                                                Roslynn R. Mauskopf  

HON. ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 61 Filed 03/30/14 Page 19 of 19 PageID #: <pageID>