carpark guide291004
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
1/58
ECONOMICAL CARPARKSA Design Guide
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
2/58
Economical Carpark
A Design Guide2nd Edition
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
3/58
Disclaimer:
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
4/58
CONTENTS
FOREWORD ........................................................iv
1. INTRODUCTION............................................. 1
1.1 Steel Carparks ........................................ 1
1.2 Layouts ................................................... 2
1.2.1 Column Location ............................ 2
1.2.2 Headroom....................................... 3
1.2.3 Ramps & Circulation ....................... 3
1.2.4 Gradients (excluding Ramps) ......... 3
1.3 Parking Modules .................................... 4
1.3.1 Single Module Schemes................. 51.3.2 Multiple Module Schemes .............. 6
1.3.3 Carpark Space Utilisation
Efficiency ........................................ 6
2. CARPARK SCHEMES AND COSTING .......... 7
2.1 Schemes ................................................. 7
2.2 Costing .................................................. 10
2.3 Engineering Drawings ......................... 10
3. DESIGN EXAMPLES .................................... 27
3.1 Example 1 ............................................. 29
3.2 Example 2 ............................................. 30
APPEN
A. STR
A.1
A.2
A.3
A.4
A.5
A.6
B. DURB.1
B.2
B.3
B.4
C. FIR
C.1
C.2
D. COS
D.1
D.2
D.3
D.4
D.5
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
5/58
FOREWORD
In 1998, BHP Integrated Steel published the First
Edition of Economical Carparks A Design Guide.Since its release countless developers and
designers have utilised the publication to assist in
the design and construction of carparks. Over the
last seven years there have been some significant
changes in design, construction techniques and in
supply of the materials required to construct these
carparks.
This Edition of the Design Guide is now publishedby OneSteel Market Mills who are the largest
manufacturer of the structural steel beams
referenced in this Guide. The standard base
material for the decking profiles have changed, as
has the number of different decking profiles
available. The Australian Design Standards have
also changed making it necessary to amend some
of the design drawings. Also two new schemes
offering column free parking spaces have beenincluded in this Edition taking the total number of
schemes to eleven.
This Edit
as well commen
OneStee
people w
the Firs
particula
Ian Benn
Chong CJohn Co
Spiros D
Anthony
Nick van
Imran Sa
Ken Wat
Gary Yum
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
6/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
7/58
1.2 Layouts
The Australian/New Zealand Standard
AS/NZS 2890.1:2004 provides guidance andminimum requirements for the design and layout ofoff-street parking facilities including multi-storeycarparks. It classifies car parking facilities accordingto the type of use as shown in Table 1. Parkingspace and aisle widths are also given for each class.The nominal length of a parking space is 5.4m.
The following discussion covers some of the major
requirements of the code which have a significantimpact on the design of a multi-storey carpark.
1.2.1 Co
The locacritical defunctiona
Construcfollowing
improv increas ease o
better s greatefloor sp
User Class Examples of Uses
1 Generally all day parkinge.g. tenant, employee and commuterparking, universities
1A Residential, domestic and employee parking- 3 point turn entry & exit
2 Generally medium term parkinge.g. long term city and town parking, sportsfacilities, entertainment centres, hotels,motels, airport visitors
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
8/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
9/58
1.3 Parking Modules
A parking module is defined in AS/NZS 2890.1:2004
as a parking aisle together with a single row ofparking spaces on one or both sides. In thisdocument only parking on both sides of the aisle isconsidered. The parking module excludes anyramps or circulation roadways which take off withinthe module.
Many variations could be developed for the differentclasses of carpark to cover all situations. In this
document, a user Class 3 module for parking at thepreferred angle of 90oto the aisle is considered.The standard module in this publication consistsof:
Parking space width 2.6mParking space length 5.4mAisle width 5.8mParking module length 16.6m (2x5.4 + 5.8)
This conpractical given in adopted
that the AS/NZS this adopadjusted beams afor the asquare msmall cha
The othstandardWhilst thcolumns eight levallowed columns width.
Module Type Scheme Description
2 car
SINGLE Internal and edge columns, -Figure 3(a)
Internal columns and cantilever edges -
Figure 3(b)
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
10/58
Carpark layouts can be divided into single andmultiple module designs:
1.3.1 Single Module Schemes
Three different single module schemes have beendeveloped, viz:
Scheme S1 - Internal columns with edge columns,see Figure 3(a);
Scheme S2 - Internal columns with cantilevers,see Figure 3(b); and
Scheme S3 - Clear span with edge columns,see Figure 3(c).
These schemes were developed for various baywidths as shown in Table 2.
A carpark may consist of a number of singlemodules as shown in Figure 4, each moduleconsisting of an aisle and a row of parking each
side. These modules can either be horizontal; seeFigure 4(a), or sloped to form a long ramp betweenthe different levels; see Figure 4(b) & 4(c). Thesingle modules provide considerable flexibility inachieving different layouts.
(a) Horiz
Bay
(b) Slop
(a) Scheme S1
(b) Scheme S2
Aisle
16600mm, Single Module
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
11/58
1.3.2 Multiple Module Schemes
Multiple module schemes are used when there area number of aisles in the same plane. They areoften used at shopping centres, hospitals andeducational institutions where the carparks arerelatively large in plan compared to their height.
Two different multiple module schemes have beendeveloped viz:
Scheme S4 - Internal columns with edge columns,
see Figure 5(a); and Scheme S5 - Internal columns with cantilevers,see Figure 5(b).
1.3.3 Carpark Space Utilisation Efficiency
Table 3 gives the square metres per car spacetogether with their relative module efficiency, foreach of the schemes. It can be seen that Schemes
S3A, S3B and S3C provide up to 4% more carspace in a given area. This is the most efficientscheme as the columns do not impinge on thedesign envelope (see Figure 1).
Reference
Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand 2004,
AS/NZS 2890 1 2004 P ki f iliti Off t t
(a) Scheme S4
(b) Scheme S5
Figure 5 - Multiple Module Schemes
Scheme Square metres Relative moduleper car space efficiency
S1A 22.4 96%S1B 22.2 97%S1C 22.1 98%S2 22.4 96%
S3A 21.6 100%
S3B 21 6 100%
AisleAisle
16600mm ModuleNext Module
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
12/58
2. CARPARK SCHEMES AND
COSTING
2.1 Schemes
Eleven carpark schemes, as shown in Figure 6,have been designed and costed. The engineeringdrawings for each of thses schemes are given inSection 2.3.
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
13/58
SCHEME
Scheme S1B: 4 car spaces per module widthRefer to Drawing 1B (page 12)
Schem
SCHEME 1: SINGLE MODULE
Scheme S1A: 3 car spaces per module widthRefer to Drawing 1A (page 11)
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
14/58
SCHEME 3: SINGLE MODULE
Scheme S3A: 2 car spaces per module widthRefer to Drawing 3A (page 15)
Scheme S3B: 3 car spaces per module widthRefer to Drawing 3B (page 16)
Scheme S4A: 3 car spaces per module widthRefer to Drawing 4A (page 18)
Scheme S4B: 4 car spaces per module widthRefer to Drawing 4B (page 19)
Scheme S
SCHEME 4: MULTIPLE MODULE SCHEME 5
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
15/58
Scheme Description Floor Costs Column Costs
$/m2
$/m2
for No. of StoreysBeams Decking Slab TOTAL 2 4 6 8
SINGLE MODULES
S1A 3 Spaces/Bay 83 40 55 178 12 15 17 19
S1B 4 Spaces/Bay 81 40 55 176 9 12 15 17
S1C 5 Spaces/Bay 101 40 55 195 9 12 14 17
S2 Cantilever 3 Spaces/Bay 94 40 55 189 10 11 12 15
S3A 2 Spaces/Bay 73 49 58 180 22 19 24 25
S3B 3 Spaces/Bay 132 40 55 226 8 10 12 14
S3C 4 Spaces/Bay 135 40 55 230 7 9 10 13
MULTIPLE MODULES
S4A 3 Spaces/Bay 84 39 55 177 9 12 15 19
S4B 4 Spaces/Bay 80 39 55 174 8 11 15 18
2.2 Costing
The cost of each of the eleven schemes has been
calculated on a square metre rate for 2, 4, 6 and 8storey high carparks. The results are presented inTable 4.
The costing has been done on the basis of usingBONDEKprofiled steel decking.
2.3 Engineering Drawings
The schemes have been designed in accordance
with the criteria given in Appendix A.
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
16/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
17/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
18/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
19/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
20/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
21/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
22/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
23/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
24/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
25/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
26/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
27/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
28/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
29/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
30/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
31/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
32/58
3. DESIGN EXAMPLES
Figures 6(a) & (b) show a flowchart outlining thetypical steps involved in arriving at a suitablepreliminary design.
Two design examples are provided in this Sectionto illustrate how the information in this Design Guidemay be used.
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
33/58
Is it astand alone
open-deck* or
sprinklered*carpark?
Is it asingle
module?
Arethere edgecolumns?
Arethere edgecolumns?
Arethere internal
columns?
STEP 1
STEP 2
STEP 3
STEP 3a
YES
NO
NOYES
YES YESNO NO
YES NO
Refer to Appendix C, Section C2Then use the appropriatesections of the guide & if requireddetermine extent of fire protection
S
S
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
34/58
The figure above shows diagrammatically the architects requirements for an8 storey carpark.
The carpark is to be open deck. The surface treatment to be appropriate for atmospheric Category C. No penetrations in primary beams required. Edge columns are permitted.
Preliminary design(see flow chart in Figure 6a):
Preliminary costing(see flow cha
STEP 6 The cost of 8 suspendeA scheme may be seleclayout. Scheme selecte
C1
PB1
C1
PB2
C2
PB1
B1
B1
B1
C2 C1C1
PB2
B1
B2
Secondary Beams
Primary Beams
310UC11
350WC193 & 4
5 & 6
Level Column C
7 & 8
1 & 2
200UC59
350WC23
Bay
Width
4150 mm 8300mm
Project Name: Carpark Design Guide Job No: CDG1Subject: EXAMPLE 1 Page: 1/2
Designed: AN Date: 1/10/98
3.1 Example 1
Design Constraints
Project Name:
Subject:
Designed:
33.2m 60m
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
35/58
Project Name: Carpark Design Guide Job No: CDG2Subject: EXAMPLE 2 Page: 1/4
Designed: AN Date: 1/10/98
Project Name:
Subject:
Designed:
A developer requires a carpark to suit the following criteria:- 4 suspended levels. Site is 34m x 75m with 3% fall across the 34m. Facade to be out of light weight steel up to barrier height only open deck
carpark. Surface treatment to be appropriate for atmospheric Category C with top coat
Preliminary design(see flow cha
STEP 1 Is it an open deck carpYes, a requirement of t
STEP 2 Is it a single module ca
Since it is 34m wide it ca multiple module of 2. across the site and alsintrude into the aisle wi
STEP 3 Are edge columns allowThere is no requirementherefore use scheme columns result in a mo
STEP 3a Are internal columns aAgain there are no requwith internal columns a
However if maximum flewould be the preferred most economical optiobe considered.
STEP 4 Schemes S1A, S1B an
3.2 Example 2
Design Constraints
NaturalGround
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
36/58
Project Name: Carpark Design Guide Job No: CDG2Subject: EXAMPLE 2 Page: 3/4
Designed: AN Date: 1/10/98
Project Name:
Subject:
Designed:
L4.5
L3.5
L2.5
L1.5
GROUND
L4
L3
L2
L1
GROUND NATURAL
GROUNDC2 C1 C1
C2a C1 C1 C2
C2
C1
C1
C2a
C1
C1
C2
C2
C2
C1
C1
C2a C
1C1
B1
B1
B1
B1
B1
2/B1
B1
B1
B1
B1
B1
B2
B2
PB1 PB2 PB2 PB1 PB2PB2
PB2 PB1 PB2 PB2 PB1 PB2
10700m
16600mm 16600mm
Mark Size Studs Camber
Primary Beams PB1 460UB82.1 36 20 mm
Secondary Beams B1 360UB50.7 26 50mm
PB2 410UB53.7 - ncu
B2 360UB44.7 - 40mm
Bay
Width
STEP 5 Columns for a 4 level ca(Contd.)
The table on drawingFor a 4 level carpark
For the C2a which is carpark, use the sam
This gives:
3
2
Level
1
4
The 10.7m bays can
Preliminary costing(see flow cha
STEP 6 The cost of a scheme is
STEP 7 Adjust base cost usingsurface coating and Ta
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
37/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
38/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
39/58
Refer to Appendix B on durability for details ofshrinkage-and-temperature and other crack-controlreinforcement.
A.4 Columns
The columns have been designed in accordancewith AS 4100-1998. Allowance has been made forpattern loading and a maximum floor-to-floor heightof 3m when determining their size.
The columns have been designed for the vertical
loads of an eight level carpark. The designs can beused for carparks with fewer levels by using sizecorresponding to the top levels e.g. for a two levelcarpark, the appropriate columns are those requiredfor levels 7 and 8. Whilst the column size is givenin increments of 2 levels, it may be more economicalin some cases to remove the column splice(s) andrun the heavier column all the way up. The practicallimit for this approach is 6 levels. This is discussed
in more detail in D.5.
The column splices have been incorporated in thedepth of the slab for aesthetic and functionalreasons.
Edge columns in single module schemes have onlybeen designed for that situation. Where twomodules abut (for example combination single
TubularHandrail
Support Landingon Steelwork orHang from abov
Stringer200x100 Flat or200PFC
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
40/58
A.5 Lateral Load Resisting Systems
The designs in this Guide only cover verticalloadings. Lateral load-resisting systems can utilise
ramps, shear walls and steel moment or bracedframes. Generally, braced frames are moreeconomical than moment frames. Braced framescan be located along the perimeter of a carpark oralong the column lines.
A.6 Stairs
To match the speed of construction offered by steel,it is common practice to adopt steel stair systems.These fall into two categories viz.:
Formwork systems such as Stairmetal Formwork
(Aus Iron Industries Pty Ltd, Melbourne -http://www.ausironindustries.com.au).
Steel stairs as shown in Figure A2. These allow
safe access to all floors during construction, aswell as providing permanent access. They areoften fully assembled in the fabrication shop andlifted directly into place on site.
References
Australian Building Code Board 2004, BuildingCode of Australia, Volume 1: Class 2 to Class 9
/www.onesteel.com/productspecs.asp?specID=54
BlueScope Steel 2003, Using BONDEK - Design &Construction Guide, BlueScope Steel Limited,
Avai lable: http :/ /www.bluescopesteel.com.au(registration required)
Chick, C. G., Dayawansa, P. H. & Patrick, M. 1998,Structural Design of Simply-supported CompositeBeams with Large Steel Web Penetrations,Australasian Structural Engineering Conference,Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 159-166
Hogan, T. J. & Thomas, I. R. 1994, Design ofStructural Connections, 4thedn, Australian Instituteof Steel Construction, North Sydney
Murray, T. M., Allen, D. E. & Ungar, E. E. 1997, FloorVibrations due to Human Activity, Steel ConstructionGuide Series 11, AISC/CISC, Chicago
Standards Australia 1981, AS 1250-1981(superceded) SAA Structural Steel Code, SAI,Sydney
Standards Australia 2003, AS 2327.1-2003Composite structures - Simply supported beams,SAI, Sydney
Standards Australia 2001,AS 3600-2001 Concrete
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
41/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
42/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
43/58
functional system where aesthetics are lessimportant;
Class 2.5 blast clean followed by 50m epoxy
zinc and 50m 2 pack acrylic (epoxy cross linked
catalysed acrylic) to provide an architectural finishin a range of colours
Szokolik (1997) has shown that a single coat ofwater borne inorganic zinc silicate will out performmulti-coat systems. However the multi-coat systemis given for situations where a different colour topcoat is desired.
Table B2 is a guide only. The corrosion protectionsystem should be designed in accordance with AS/NZS 2312:2002. Labour rather than material costdrives the applied cost of coating systems. Oftensimilar corrosion resistance can be achievedindependent of aesthetics.
Reference should be made to Appendix D for costs
of alternate coating systems
B.4 Monitoring
In accordance with normal practice, an inspectionwould be undertaken towards the end of thecontract defects-liability period. This should identifyitems which require ongoing monitoring such asexpansion joints.
Proe, D. J., Patrick, M. & Goh, C. C. 1997,Simplified Design of Continuous Composite Slabsincluding Moment Redistribution and Crack
Control, Fifteenth Australasian Conference on theMechanics of Structures and Materials, Melbourne,pp. 147-152
Standards Australia 1997, AS 1627.0-1997 Metalfinishing - Preparation and pretreatment of surfaces
- Method selection guide, SAI, Sydney
Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand 2002,
AS/NZS 2312:2002 Guide to the protection ofstructural steel against atmospheric corrosion by
the use of protective coatings, SAI, Sydney
Szokolik, A. & Rapattoni, F. 1997, Single-coatInorganic Zic Silicate. Is this the Definitive Answerfor Surface Protection of Steel Bridges?,Preceedings of the 1997 Bridge Conference,Sydney
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
44/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
45/58
C. FIRE-RESISTANCE
REQUIREMENTS
C.1 Open-deck or SprinkleredCarparks
According to the Building Code of Australia (2004),open-deck and sprinklered carparks can beconstructed from bare steel construction providedthat the columns and beams achieve certainrequirements with respect to their surface-area-to-mass ratio.
The BCA defines an open-deck carpark as a carparkwhich is cross ventilated using two approximatelyopposite sides. The sides that provide ventilationmust be at least 1/6 of the area of any other sideand the opening must be at least 1/2 of the wallarea (see Figure C1).
Appendix C
C2 No
Sprink
The desito carpasprinklestructuracarparkssprinklerein detail Carparks& Thom
consulterequired
Refere
AustraliaCode of Buildings
BennettsEconom
OneStee/www.on
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
46/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
47/58
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
48/58
D.3 Dif
System
The cost has a maThe cost schemesthat an aflange anhas beenexcept foless than
membersattractiveneed to b
D4 Pen
The cost of steel bthe cost penetratrectangugenerallyin a carpprimarypenetratin the ordentire car
Table D2 - Surface Treatment Costs
Scheme Protection System Costs $/m2
Atmospheric Corrosivity Category Add. Top Add. Top Hot-dip
A B C D/F E Coat A1 Coat Oth2 Galvanized
S1A 9 14 15 20 21 8 11 14S1B 10 15 16 21 23 9 12 14S1C 12 18 20 25 27 12 16 25S2 10 15 16 21 22 9 12 16
S3A 6 9 10 13 14 6 8 12S3B 14 22 24 32 34 14 19 31S3C 14 21 23 31 33 14 19 30S4A 10 15 16 21 22 9 12 15S4B 10 15 17 21 23 9 12 15
S4C 11 17 18 24 25 11 15 23S5 9 14 15 20 21 9 12 15
Penetrations Unreinforced Reinforced
Section mass Circular Rectangular Rectangular Rectangular Rectangular
(kg/m) Hours $ Hours $ Hours $ Hours $ Hours $
< 60.5 0.4 24 0.7 42 2.0 120 3.4 204 4.2 25260.6 to 160 0.5 30 0.8 48 2.4 144 4.1 246 5.7 342160.1 to 455 0.7 42 1.2 72 3.7 222 6.1 366 8.5 510
Diagram
Notes:1. Cost of additional top coat applied over Category A finish2. Cost of additional top coat applied over all other surface finishes except Hot-dip Galvanized
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
49/58
and $800. Therefore, in general it is better tominimise the number of splices rather than the massof the column.
The maximum length of column section that isreadily available and still easy to handle is 18metres. Therefore, it is recommended that forcarparks less than four levels high, the columnsare made from one length (without splices). With asix level carpark, the cost of a non-prismatic columnwith splices is similar to that of a prismaticcontinuous column. The choice will depend on thescheme being adopted and the time allowed for
fabrication and erection. For an eight level carpark,it is suggested that a splice be provided at mid-length for maximum economy.
References
Watson, K. B., Dallas, S. van der Kreek, N. & Main,T. 1996, Costing of Steelwork from Feasibility
through to Completion, Journal of AustralianInstitute of Steel Construction, vol. 30, no. 2
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
50/58
E. SURVEY OF EXISTING
CARPARKS
There have been a significant number of steelcarparks constructed in Australia and New Zealandof various configurations in plan and elevation. Thisappendix lists many of these carparks.
Information on these are presented in tables, foreach state of Australia, and one for New Zealand.These tables provide available information on eachof the carparks.
Appendix E
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
51/58
ACT
Dickson Shopping Centre, Dickson, Canberra 4 326 1996 Precas
Woden Valley Hospital, Woden Valley 2 350 1994 Tensio
on stee
Manuka Carpark, Corner Furneau & Bouganville Road, Manuka 1 170 1993 Compo
ANU Carpark, ANU, Canberra 3 330 1985 PrecasNational Gallery of Australia, Parkes Place, Canberra 1 1974 Cast in
City West Carpark, Civic, Canberra 5 1100 Compo
Northern Territory
K- Mart, Palmerston, Darwin 1 400 1998 Compo
Queensland
Gary Crick Auto 1 150 2003 Compo
Capalaba Shopping Centre, Capalaba, Brisbane 1 200 1995 Compo
Petrie Rail Interchange, Petrie 1 270 1993 Precas
St Andrews Hospital, North St, Spring Hill 1 42 1993 Precas
City Centre Plaza, Rockhampton 2 330 1990 Compo
Mal Burke, Southport 1 90 1988 Precas
Rockhampton Shopping Centre 1 300 1987 Compo
Noof
Suspended
Steel
Carpark
Levels
Noof
CarSpaces
Open
Close
d
Stand
alone
Multiu
se
Yearof
Construction
Name
/Location Carpark Type
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
52/58
New South Wales
Nowra Fair Shopping Centre, Haigh St, Nowra 1 80 2000 Co
Cowra Carpark, Busby Place, Cowra 1 70 Co
Westfields Hornsby Carpark Extension 1 150 2001 Co
Albury Commercial Club Carpark, Albury 2 160 2001 Co
TNT Office Carpark, Mascot 3 200 2000 Co
Parramatta RSL Carpark, Parramatta 3 190 2000 Co
Prince of Wales Carpark, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick 2 270 1998 Co
Big W Retail Carpark, Griffith 1 360 1997 Co
King Street Carpark, King Street, Newcastle 3.5 160 1997 Co
Mascot Airport Carpark -Stage 4, Keith Smith Avenue, Domestic Terminal, Mascot 4 1997 Str
HIA Building & Renovata Supa Centre, Homebush Bay 2 190 1996 Co
Liverpool Hospital Carpark, Liverpool 3 456 1995 Pre
Thornleigh Railway Station, Yarrara Street, Thornleigh 2 1994 Pre
Murwillumbah Hospital Carpark, Murwillumbah 2 80 1991 Pre
Bankstown City Council Carpark, Brandon Avenue, Bankstown 3 240 1988 Co
Blacktown City Council Carpark, Nelson Lane, Blacktown 4 500 1987 Ca
IBM Carpark, Coonara Avenue, West Pennant Hills 8 630 1987 Ca
Novotel Hotel Carpark, Darling Harbour 4 1800 1987 Co
Noof
Suspended
Steel
Carpark
Level
s
Noof
CarSpaces
Open
Close
d
Stand
alone
Multiu
se
Yearof
Construction
Name
/Location Carpark Type
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
53/58
South Australia
Mt Barker Carpark, Cnr. Druids Ave & Adelaide Rd 1 286 2003 Composite
The Royal Adelaide Hospital Carpark 9 1440 2002 Composite
Mill Street Auto Park 8 519 2001 Composite
Christian Brothers Sport Centre, Flinders St 1 120 1998 Composite
EDS, North Terrace, Adelaide 4 245 1998 Composite
Mt Gambier 1 302 1998 Composite
Salvation Army, Pirie St 1998 Composite
Adelaide University, Frome St, Adelaide 6 500 1997 Composite
Childrens Hospital, Kermode St, Nth Adelaide 5 125 1995 Composite
Hindley Plaza, Clubhouse Lane 6 294 1995 Composite
2 Floor Extension, Grenfell St 2 120 1992 Composite
Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park 4 420 1991 Composite
Blyght St 5 1990 Composite
Childrens Hospital, Kermode St, Nth Adelaide 5 400 1989 Composite
Playhouse Lane, Light Sq. 7 375 1989 Composite
Wyatt St 4 760 1989 Precast
Roper St 7 644 1988 Precast
Southgate, South Terrace, Adelaide 4 320 1987 Composite
Noof
Suspended
Steel
Carpark
Level
s
Noof
CarSpaces
Open
Close
d
Stand
alone
Multiuse
Yearof
Construction
Name
/Location Carpark Type
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
54/58
Victoria
Deakin University, Melbourne Campus, Burwood 3 2003 Compo
Federation Square Russell St Extn, Melbourne 3 2003 Compo
Little Lonsdale St, Melbourne AddaTop 6 2003 Compo
Monash University, Clayton Campus North West Section 1 2 2003 Compo
Deakin University, Melbourne Campus, Burwood 3 2002 Compo
Grocon QV Tentants BHP Billiton, Melbourne 5 2002 Compo
Klopfer & Dobos Waverley Rd, Glen Waverley 1 15 2002 Compo
Monash University, Clayton Campus North West Section 1 2 2001 Compo
Pran Central Wattle St, Prahran 2 2001 Compo
Hickory Developments Cnr Smithfield & Epsom Rds, Kensington 1 36 2001 Non co
Salta Properties Cook St, Port Melbourne 2 2001 Compo
209 Kings Way South, Melbourne 6 2001 Compo
Blakford 370 Queen St, Melbourne 2 2001 Compo
Deakin University, Burwood Hwy, Burwood 2 587 1998 Compo
Blessed Sacrament Fathers - St Francis 312, Lonsdale St, Melbourne 6 530 1992 Non co
Maroondah Hospital, Mt Dandenong Rd, Ringwood 1 1992 Non co
Heidelberg City Council, 21 Yarra Bvd, Heidelberg 1 1991 Compo
Watt Street Carpark, Watt St, Box Hill 4 1991 Compo
Noof
Suspended
Steel
Carpark
Level
s
Noof
CarSpaces
Open
Close
d
Stand
alone
Multiuse
Yearof
Construction
Name
/Location Carpark Type
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
55/58
Victoria (Contd.)
Grand Mercure Hotel, 333 Collins St, Melbourne 5 364 1990 Compo
Macedon Square Shopping Centre, Manningham Rd, Templestowe Lower 1 1990 Compo
17 Burgundy St, Heidelburg 1 1989 Compo
9 Porter St, Dandenong 2 1989 Compo
Burwood Highway, Knoxfield 1 1989 Compo
Commercial Union Assurance Co of Australia, Lonsdale St, Melbourne 3 1989 Compo
Jolimont St, East Melbourne 1 1989 Compo
Mt Eliza Way & Canadian, Mt Eliza 1 1989 Compo
Carlton & United Breweries, Flockhart St, Abbotsford 4 450 1988 Compo
Cnr Kooyong & High Sts, Armadale 1 1987 Compo
Victorian Operative Bricklayers Society, Bary St, Carlton 6 1987 Compo
Chambers St, South Yarra 2 20
Tasmania
Hobart City Council, Argyle St Carpark Extension, Hobart 2 1994 Compo
Launceston City Council, Paterson St West Carpark, Launceston 6
Western Australia
Collie Street, Fremantle 9 split level 448 2003 Compo
Call Centre, Bunbury 1 2003 Compo
Noof
Suspended
Steel
Carpark
Level
s
Noof
CarSpaces
Open
Close
d
Stand
alone
Multiuse
Yearof
Cons
truction
Name
/Location Carpark Type
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
56/58
New Zealand
St Mathews Carpark, Hobson St, Auckland 4 131 1996 Speedfloor trusses with 90 m
Teachers College Carpark, Union St East, Dunedin 2 3000 1996 130mm slab on HiBond 0.75
Newmarket Carpark, Broadway, Auckland 6 507 1996 130mm slab on HiBond 0.75
Arthur Barnetts, George St, Dunedin 4 456 1996 130 mm topping on 0.95mm
Watt St Carpark, Watts St, Auckland 3 99 1995 Speedfloor trusses with 90 m
Great King St Carpark, Great King St, Dunedin 4 360 1994 130 topping on HiBond
Skycity Carpark, Hob St, Auckland 5 1998 1994 130 -200 mm topping on 0.7
Wakefield Street, Wakefield St, Auckland 6 350 1986 HiBond
Noof
Suspended
Steel
Carpark
Levels
Noof
CarSpaces
Open
Close
d
Stand
alone
Multiuse
Yearof
Cons
truction
Floor
System
Table E6 Survey of Existing Carparks New Zealand
Name
/Location Carpark Type
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
57/58
Appendix F F. EXAMPLES OF RAMPCONFIGURATIONS
Common ramp configurations for both one-way andtwo-way traffic flow are presented in this appendix
Figure F1 - Examples of Ramp Configurations
for Combined Single Module Split level
carparks (refer to Figure 4a)
Figure
(a) One way traffic flow - Fast exit (b) One way traffic flow - Scissor ramp
-
7/22/2019 Carpark Guide291004
58/58
FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:
ONESTEEL DIRECT
39-45 Flagstaff Road Port Kembla NSW 2505
Locked Bag 8825 South Coast Mail Centre NSW 2521
Phone: 1800 1 STEEL (1800 1 78335) Fax: 1800 101 141
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.onesteel.com
9
3
2
0
0
7
5
0
4
1
7
0
0