cancer dx algorithm

46
1 Mission: Mission: We connect to fight cancer! We connect to fight cancer! As a world-leading expert Dako As a world-leading expert Dako continuously challenges and raises the continuously challenges and raises the global standards for fast and accurate global standards for fast and accurate answers for cancer patients and answers for cancer patients and doctors doctors making vital decisions for treatment making vital decisions for treatment CONNECTING REAGENTS,INSTRUMENTS AND SOFTWARE Shaping the future of cancer diagnosis

Upload: lawrence-richards

Post on 13-Nov-2014

4.493 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


2 download

DESCRIPTION

This is needs to be updated as new Biomarkers and Dx antibodies come into existence in remarkable numbers every day! You have to construct an algorithm based on your need and availability of antibodies. Selection of Antibodies for the algorithm also depends on your ability to recognize the characterization of the specific antibody.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cancer Dx Algorithm

1

Mission: Mission: We connect to fight cancer!We connect to fight cancer!

As a world-leading expert DakoAs a world-leading expert Dako continuously challenges and raises the continuously challenges and raises the global standards for fast and accurate global standards for fast and accurate answers for cancer patients and doctors answers for cancer patients and doctors making vital decisions for treatmentmaking vital decisions for treatment

CONNECTING REAGENTS,INSTRUMENTS AND

SOFTWARE

Shaping the future of cancer diagnosis

                

            

Page 2: Cancer Dx Algorithm

2

Diagnosis of Diagnosis of CancerCancer using using

AlgorithmsAlgorithms

Lawrence T. RichardsLawrence T. RichardsM.S.,H.T(ASCP).,QIHC(ASCP).M.S.,H.T(ASCP).,QIHC(ASCP).

Page 3: Cancer Dx Algorithm

3

This presentation is by no means intended as a replacement of the professional judgment of a certified pathologist. The contents of the algorithm are provided as informative only, and should not be regarded as indicative of standard procedure for diagnosis or treatment.

Page 4: Cancer Dx Algorithm

4

Diagnosis of Cancer using Diagnosis of Cancer using AlgorithmsAlgorithms

A diagnostic algorithm is a method which A diagnostic algorithm is a method which utilizes a panel of antibodies intended to utilizes a panel of antibodies intended to solve a diagnostic problemsolve a diagnostic problem

Many different diagnostic algorithms exist Many different diagnostic algorithms exist and are available in journals and text and are available in journals and text booksbooks

A diagnostic algorithm is followed by a A diagnostic algorithm is followed by a selective markers for tumor sub selective markers for tumor sub classification.classification.

The panel of antibodies selected should be The panel of antibodies selected should be based on the morphological appearance of based on the morphological appearance of the tissue (H & E) and the patient’s the tissue (H & E) and the patient’s clinical history provided by the physician.clinical history provided by the physician.

Page 5: Cancer Dx Algorithm

5

MUC-1 PAS

MUC-1(IHC) PAS (Special Stain)

AdenoCarcinoma

Special stain vs IHCSpecial stain vs IHC

Page 6: Cancer Dx Algorithm

6

Markers and HistogenesisMarkers and Histogenesis HISTOGENESISHISTOGENESIS MARKERSMARKERS MesenchymalMesenchymal VimentinVimentin EpithelialEpithelial Cytokeratin, EMACytokeratin, EMA Smooth MuscleSmooth Muscle Desmin, HHF35, Desmin, HHF35,

SmActinSmActin Skeletal MuscleSkeletal Muscle MyoglobinMyoglobin FibrohistiocyteFibrohistiocyte CD68, Factor XIIIaCD68, Factor XIIIa Nerve SheathNerve Sheath Leu7,Leu7,Glial fibrillary acidic Glial fibrillary acidic

proteinprotein MelanocyteMelanocyte HMB 45HMB 45 Neuronal Neuronal Neurofilament Neurofilament Endothelial, perivascularEndothelial, perivascular Factor Factor

VIII,CD34,CD31VIII,CD34,CD31 HematopoiticHematopoitic LCA,CD3,CD20,Ki-1LCA,CD3,CD20,Ki-1 NeuroendocrineNeuroendocrine

NSE,Chromogranin,SynaptophysinNSE,Chromogranin,Synaptophysin Ewing’s sarcoma/PNETEwing’s sarcoma/PNET MIC-2(O-13)MIC-2(O-13)

Source:www.moffitt.usf.edu/pubs/ccj/v5nl/department5/htmlSource:www.moffitt.usf.edu/pubs/ccj/v5nl/department5/html

Page 7: Cancer Dx Algorithm

7

Basic Flow ChartBasic Flow ChartSequentialSequential

First Round

(+) ( - )

(+)

(+)

(+)

( - )

( - )

( - )

Second round

Page 8: Cancer Dx Algorithm

8

Use of Panel of Use of Panel of AntibodiesAntibodies

Ab1 Ab1 Ab2Ab2 Ab3Ab3 Ab4Ab4 Ab5 Ab5 Ab6Ab6

+ (-)+ (-) + + (-)(-) + + + Tumor-1+ Tumor-1

(-)(-) ++ (-)(-) ++ (-)(-) (-) Tumor-2(-) Tumor-2

Page 9: Cancer Dx Algorithm

9

Differential ApplicationDifferential Application

Tumor 1Tumor 1 Tumor 2Tumor 2 Ab1 +Ab1 + Ab1 –Ab1 – Ab2 -Ab2 - Ab2 +Ab2 +

Page 10: Cancer Dx Algorithm

10

Diagnostic AlgorithmDiagnostic Algorithmfor unknown Tumor Typefor unknown Tumor Type

CarcinoCarcinomama

LymphoLymphomama

MelanoMelanomama

SarcomaSarcoma NotesNotes

Pan Pan KeratinKeratin

PositivPositivee

NegativeNegative NegativeNegative NegativeNegative ForFor

Poorly Poorly differentiated differentiated malignant malignant tumor tumor differentiationdifferentiation

Caution:Caution:

Variation in Variation in cellular cellular pattern can pattern can misleadmislead

(+)(+) and and (-)(-)..

LCALCA NegativeNegative PositivPositivee

NegativeNegative NegativeNegative

S 100 / S 100 / HMB45/HMB45/

MART-1MART-1

TyrosinaseTyrosinase

NegativeNegative NegativeNegative PositivPositivee

NegativeNegative

DesminDesmin NegativeNegative NegativeNegative NegativeNegative PositivPositivee

VimentinVimentin NegativeNegative NegativeNegative PositivePositive PositivPositivee

Source adopted from: DAKO training manual

Page 11: Cancer Dx Algorithm

11

Undifferentiated Undifferentiated Malignant NeoplasmMalignant Neoplasm

Abs toAbs to Abs/Abs/cloneclone

CarcinoCarcinomama

LymphoLymphomama

MelanoMelanomama

SarcomaSarcoma

CytokerCytokeratinatin

AE1/AE3AE1/AE3

VimentinVimentin V9V9

MelanoMelanoma ma antigenantigen

HMB 45HMB 45

CD 45CD 45 PD7/2B1PD7/2B111

CD43CD43

Almost always positive

Almost always Negative Sometimes positive

Sometimes negative

Gowen AM.Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry of Solid Tumors: Strategies and Solutions,USCAP;2002 #35

Page 12: Cancer Dx Algorithm

12

Carcinoma of Carcinoma of Unknown PrimaryUnknown Primary

The hypothesis is that the The hypothesis is that the primary tumor either remains primary tumor either remains

microscopic and escapes clinical microscopic and escapes clinical detection detection oror disappears after disappears after

seeding the metastasis.seeding the metastasis.

Antibody AlgorithmAntibody Algorithm is used to is used toSearch for primary SiteSearch for primary SiteRule out Non-Carcinoma Rule out Non-Carcinoma

Like lymphoma, melanoma, Like lymphoma, melanoma, sarcomasarcoma

Identify Sub-Groups for Identify Sub-Groups for TreatmentTreatment

Page 13: Cancer Dx Algorithm

13

Undifferentiated panel: Ca vs Mel vs La Keratin AE1/3 mix, 90%+ of Ca Not CK7 or 20 or 5/6 to start with EMA, CEA as backups S100, 95%+ of Mel 10% of Ca are + HMB45, MelanA less sensitive, very specific LCA or CD20 90% of lymphomas Things that might be neg Anaplastic large cell lymphoma - use CD30, ALK Plasmacytoma – use CD138, kappa, lambda Sarcomas – use various markers, esp vascular Spindled/sarcomatoid carcinoma – use CK5/6 and p63 Liver – use HepPar1 Adrenal – use Inhibin, MelanA Seminoma/germinoma – use OCT3/4

http://surgpathcriteria.stanford.edu/IPOXHandout.pdf

Page 14: Cancer Dx Algorithm

14

: >90% of tumors positive*

: 50-90% of tumors positive*

:

10-50% of tumors positive*

: <10% of tumors positive*

? : Insufficient evidence[ ]

: Staining of secondary (non-neoplastic) cell type

( )

:Staining dependant on antibody

* Positive Generally : unequivocal staining of =10% of tumor cells

 

Threshold for PositivityThreshold for Positivity

+/-

+

-/+

(-)

Source: Dako antibody algorithm

Page 15: Cancer Dx Algorithm

15

Metastatic Adenocarcinoma ofMetastatic Adenocarcinoma of unknown origin

with site specific markerswith site specific markers

PSA+(-)

(-)

(-)

(-)

(-)

(-)

(-)

(-)

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Prostate

Lung

Stomach/PancreasBreast

Colon

Colon

Stomach / Pancreas

Breast

Ovary

Pancreas,(Ovary serous)

Stomach / Pancreas

Breast / Stomach / Pancreas

Source: www.clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/egi/content/full/11/10/3766

TTF-1

GCDFP15

CDX2 / CK20

ER

CA125

Mesothelin

Lysozyme

+

+

+

(-)

(-)

(-)

CDX2

CK 7

Mesothelin

MC5+ (98%)

PE10+TTF-1=100%Lung

CK8+CK18=100% AdCa

CK7(+)

All (-) do HEPPAR-1 for HCC

Mixed pattern

Page 16: Cancer Dx Algorithm

16

Differential DiagnosisDifferential Diagnosis Bladder vs Bladder vs

Prostate ca Prostate ca

Cytokeratin Cytokeratin 77

++ (-)(-)

Cytokeratin Cytokeratin 2020

++ (-)(-)

CEACEA ++ (-)(-)

PAPPAP (-)(-) ++

PSAPSA (-)(-) ++

Goldstein N.Immunohistochemical Antibody Panels to help Identify the Primary Sites of Various Carcinomas;ASCP Teleconference # 2109

Page 17: Cancer Dx Algorithm

17

Mesothelioma or

Small Cell Carcinoma ?

Mesothelioma=BG8(-);Calretinin(+);MOC-31(-)

SmallCellCa= TTF-1 (+);Leu-7(+)

Page 18: Cancer Dx Algorithm

18

Mesothelioma vs CarcinomaMesothelioma vs CarcinomaAntigenAntigen Mesothelioma %Mesothelioma % Carcinoma %Carcinoma %

CytokeratinCytokeratin 100100 100100

EMAEMA 8080 100100

ThrombomodulinThrombomodulin 100100 88

Leu-M1Leu-M1 1010 7575

S-100S-100 1010 8585

CEACEA 00 1515Placental Alkaline Placental Alkaline PhosphatasePhosphatase

00 6565

VimentinVimentin 4040 3030

Ber-EP4Ber-EP4 00 8080

CalretininCalretinin 9090 3030

B72.3B72.3 00 7070Brown RW et al.Multiple-marker immunohistochemical phenotypes distinguishing malignant Brown RW et al.Multiple-marker immunohistochemical phenotypes distinguishing malignant pleural mesothelioma from pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol.1993;24:347-354pleural mesothelioma from pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol.1993;24:347-354

Page 19: Cancer Dx Algorithm

19

Cytokeratin Cytokeratin phenotypephenotype CK phenotypeCK phenotype CK7 (-) / CK 20 CK7 (-) / CK 20

(-)(-)

CK7 (+) / CK 20 CK7 (+) / CK 20 (-)(-)

CK7 (-) / CK 20 CK7 (-) / CK 20 (+)(+)

CK7 (+) / CK 20 CK7 (+) / CK 20 (+)(+)

TumorsTumors HNC, Liver, Lung (SqCC and HNC, Liver, Lung (SqCC and

SmCC),Prostate, RenalSmCC),Prostate, Renal

Biliary and Pancreas, Breast, Biliary and Pancreas, Breast, Cervical, EM, Lung(Ad ca), Cervical, EM, Lung(Ad ca), Ovarian (non-mucinous), Ovarian (non-mucinous), thyroidthyroid

Colon, Gastric, Markel C caColon, Gastric, Markel C ca

Biliary and Pancreas, Ovarian Biliary and Pancreas, Ovarian (Mucinous), Urothelial.(Mucinous), Urothelial.

Source: from Adopted Dennis JL, Clin Cancer Res 2005

Page 20: Cancer Dx Algorithm

20

Cytokeratin for Carcinoma Cytokeratin for Carcinoma DiagnosisDiagnosis

CK5CK5 CK7CK7 CK20CK20Breast Ca DuctalBreast Ca Ductal ★★ ● ● ○ ○Lung nonsmall CellLung nonsmall Cell ○ ○ ● ● ○ ○ (non SqCCa) (non SqCCa) Lung SqCCaLung SqCCa ● ● ★ ★ ○ ○Pancreatic Ca Pancreatic Ca ○ ○ ★ ★ ★ ★ Colorectal Ad Ca Colorectal Ad Ca ○ ○ ○ ○ ● ●Mesothelioma Mesothelioma ● ● ● ● ○ ○Prostatic Ad CaProstatic Ad Ca ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ Transitional Cell CaTransitional Cell Ca ● ● ● ● ● ●

★ ★ May be Positive ● Positive ○ NegativeMay be Positive ● Positive ○ Negative

Source: A.M.Gown ASCP Course #35Source: A.M.Gown ASCP Course #35

Page 21: Cancer Dx Algorithm

21

Prostate Ca or Prostate Ca or Benign ?Benign ?

Prostate Prostate CancerCancer EpCam +EpCam + ATM +ATM + AMACR +AMACR + PSA + / (-)PSA + / (-) 3434ßE12 (-) almost allßE12 (-) almost all p63 (-) almost allp63 (-) almost all Prostein +Prostein + NKX3.1 + NKX3.1 +

Benign Benign ProstateProstate

EpCam (-)EpCam (-) ATM (-) / +ATM (-) / + AMACR (-)AMACR (-) PSA + / (-)PSA + / (-) 3434ßE12 +ßE12 + p63 +p63 + Prostein +Prostein + NKX3.1 + NKX3.1 +

Hammerich KH et al.Application of Immunohistochemistry to the Genitourinary System(Prostate, Urinary Bladder, Testis, and Kidney)Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine;132:432-440,2007

ATM=ataxia-telangiectasia mutated;AMACR=alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase;Ep-Cam=epithelial transmembrane glycoprotein

Page 22: Cancer Dx Algorithm

22

Urothelial Ca vs Urothelial Ca vs Prostate CaProstate Ca

EMAEMA CK7CK7 P63P63 CK5/6CK5/6 EpCamEpCam CD57CD57 PSAPSA PAPPAP NKX3.NKX3.

11 ProsteiProstei

nn

++ --++ --+/-+/- 00+/-+/- 00+/-+/- 00

-/+-/+ +/-+/- 00 ++

00 +/-+/- 00 ++ 00 ++ 00 ++

Urothelial ca Prostate ca

Hammerich KH.Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine;132(3):432-440

Urothelial ca

Prostate ca

Page 23: Cancer Dx Algorithm

23

Ab CocktailsAb Cocktails Breast CaBreast Ca: : ER + GCDFP-15ER + GCDFP-15 MelanomaMelanoma: : MART-1+Melan MART-1+Melan

A+Tyrosine +A+Tyrosine +

PNL2PNL2 Basal Cell MarkerBasal Cell Marker: : p63 + 34betaE12 p63 + 34betaE12

+ +

CK5/6CK5/6 Endocrine Ca:Endocrine Ca: Chrom A+NSE +Chrom A+NSE +

SynaptophysinSynaptophysin Pan SarcomaPan Sarcoma: Vim + Coll IV + CD 99: Vim + Coll IV + CD 99

Page 24: Cancer Dx Algorithm

24

Endocervical Ad.Ca & Endocervical Ad.Ca & Endometrial Mucinous Endometrial Mucinous

Ad.CaAd.CaECAECA MUC-1(-)MUC-1(-) ER(-)ER(-) PR(-)PR(-) P16(+)P16(+)

EMMAEMMA MUC-1 (+)MUC-1 (+) ER(+)ER(+) PR(+)PR(+) P16(-)P16(-)

Khoury T et al.BMC Clin Path 2006;6:1

Page 25: Cancer Dx Algorithm

25

A, Normal post-menopausal endometrium (H&E, 20x); B, MUC1 immunostain in normal postmenopausal endometrium showing “pure apical” staining pattern (x20); C, normal endocervical glands (H&E, 20x); D, MUC1 immunostain in normal endocervical glands showing A/C staining pattern, (x20).

MUC1-Purely Apical vs Apical & Cytoplasmic

Khoury T, et al.BMC Clin Pathol.2006;6:1

Page 26: Cancer Dx Algorithm

26

A, Endocervical adenocarcinoma (H&E, x20); B, MUC1 immunostain in endocervical adenocarcinoma showing apical staining pattern (x20).

Page 27: Cancer Dx Algorithm

27

A, Endometrial mucinous adenocarcinoma (H&E, x10); B, MUC1 immunostain in endometrial mucinous adenocarcinoma showing A/C staining pattern (x10); C, MUC1 immunostain in endometrial mucinous adenocarcinoma showing A/C staining pattern (x40).

Page 28: Cancer Dx Algorithm

28

The Cost-Effectiveness of The Cost-Effectiveness of IHCIHC

Why do IHC assay?Why do IHC assay? To increase patient life expectancy by correctTo increase patient life expectancy by correct

diagnosis and treatment plan.diagnosis and treatment plan. To increase diagnostic certaintyTo increase diagnostic certainty To predict patient prognosisTo predict patient prognosis

eg., 35yr old female, history of Br ca, radical eg., 35yr old female, history of Br ca, radical mastectomy performed earlier. Now mastectomy performed earlier. Now diagnosed with cirrhosis and liver mass.diagnosed with cirrhosis and liver mass.

1.1. Meatastatic Ad Ca ?Meatastatic Ad Ca ?2.2. Hepato Cellular Ca ?Hepato Cellular Ca ?

Page 29: Cancer Dx Algorithm

29

http://www.dako.com/asp/algo/http://www.dako.com/asp/algo/default.asp?default.asp?

get=disclaimer&type=noget=disclaimer&type=noContact:

Gitte SjorslevMail: [email protected]

DAKO Cancer Diagnostic Algorithms

DAKO Cancer Diagnostic Algorithms

Page 30: Cancer Dx Algorithm

30

Navigating DAKO Cancer Navigating DAKO Cancer Diagnostic Algorithm.Diagnostic Algorithm.

Terms and Conditions for use - Dako Antibody AlgorithmTerms and Conditions for use - Dako Antibody Algorithm

Antibody Algorithm - Contents Antibody Algorithm - Search eg.,

ChooseSearchTumor Antibody

Page 31: Cancer Dx Algorithm

31

Table 1

Table 1

Page 32: Cancer Dx Algorithm

32

Table 2.0

Page 33: Cancer Dx Algorithm

33

Table 2.1

Page 34: Cancer Dx Algorithm

34

LastlyLastly

“ “The Diagnostic Power of any The Diagnostic Power of any Immunohistochemical Procedure Immunohistochemical Procedure is no Greater than the wisdom of is no Greater than the wisdom of the Pathologist interpreting it.” the Pathologist interpreting it.”

Dr.Allen GownDr.Allen Gown

Page 35: Cancer Dx Algorithm

35

http://www.ascp.org/pdf/5604TableofContents.aspx

Efficient Tumor ImmunohistochemistryA Differential Diagnosis-Driven Approach

M. Nadji, MD, M. Nassiri, MD,and A.R. Morales, MD

http://www.nordiqc.com/

http://appliedimmuno.org/

http://surgpathcriteria.stanford.edu/IPOXHandout.pdf

http://www.immunoportal.com/index.php

http://web.ncifcrf.gov/rtp/lasp/phl/immuno/

http://www.phenopath.com/diagnostic/teaching.htm

Web Sites

Page 36: Cancer Dx Algorithm

36

Thanks to

DAKO

&

MMJ Biosystems Philippines, Inc.

Address: Unit 206 CYA Land Bldg. (formerly LTC Corporate Center Bldg.)

#282 EDSA Extension Cor. P. Celle Street, Pasay City, Manila

Tel. nos.: (632) 851-0192 to 93/489-1008Telefax: (632) 853-3665

email: [email protected]

Page 37: Cancer Dx Algorithm

37

Page 38: Cancer Dx Algorithm

38 www.markwickmd.com/documents/UNDIFF_TMRS2.ppt

Page 39: Cancer Dx Algorithm

39

Page 40: Cancer Dx Algorithm

40

Page 41: Cancer Dx Algorithm

41

Page 42: Cancer Dx Algorithm

42

Page 43: Cancer Dx Algorithm

43

Page 44: Cancer Dx Algorithm

44

Page 45: Cancer Dx Algorithm

45

www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6890/6/1/figure/F3?highres=ywww.moffitt.usf.edu/pubs/ccj/v5nl/department5/htmlGowen AM.Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry of Solid Tumors: Strategies and Solutions,USCAP;2002 #35Source: www.clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/egi/content/full/11/10/3766Goldstein N.Immunohistochemical Antibody Panels to help Identify the Primary Sites of Various Carcinomas;ASCP Teleconference Brown RW et al.Multiple-marker immunohistochemical phenotypes distinguishing malignant pleural mesothelioma from pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol.1993;24:347-354Dennis JL, Clin Cancer Res 2005Source: A.M.Gown ASCP Course #35Hammerich KH et al.Application of Immunohistochemistry to the Genitourinary System(Prostate, Urinary Bladder, Testis, and Kidney)Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine;132:432-440,2007Hammerich KH.Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine;132(3):432-440Khoury T et al.BMC Clin Path 2006;6:1www.markwickmd.com/documents/UNDIFF_TMRS2.ppt

Page 46: Cancer Dx Algorithm

46

ER by Nadji M

Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2008 Mar;16(2):105-7

“Seasoned immunohistochemists, nevertheless, know that IHC of routinely fixed and processed tissue does not yield itself to accurate quantitation of results, even when performed by well-qualified laboratories. Furthermore, in the case of ER, immunohistochemical methods only identify a segment or epitope of ER protein that is immunologically reactive with the used antibody. Hence, as it is, an immunohistochemical technique gives no information about the functional status of ER molecule, and/or that of the complex downstream ER pathways. This may be one of the reasons why one-third of patients with ER-positive breast cancers initially, and another one-third eventually, do not respond to endocrine treatment modalities. In this review, I attempt to present an argument that is based on our current information; quantitation of ER-IHC is neither”