canadian national election study, 1965

ICPSR Inter-university Consortium for

Political and Social Research

Canadian National Election Study, 1965

Philip Converse John Meisel

Maurice Pinard Peter Regenstreif Mildred Schwartz

ICPSR 7225 This document was previously available in paper format only. It was converted to Portable Document Format (PDF), with no manual editing, on the date below as part of ICPSR's electronic document conversion project. The document may not be completely searchable. No additional updating of this collection has been performed (pagination, missing pages, etc.).

June 2002

ICPSR

This PDF file contains pages that are larger than 8.5x11. Click the Shrink to Fit or Fit to Page option in the print menu to print all pages on letter size paper.

I --mI”^-e-P -n_.*“LII...“._.I ..*...*._- _- -, _ -...*-. _ , L, .,:“-~-“~~ . ..I. I

INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH

I C

CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY

1965

P S R

I Philip Converse

Principal John Meisel Investigators Maurice Pinard

Peter Regenstreif Mildred Schwartz

The University of Michigan Queen’s University McGill University University of Rochester

. ..NOR.C_~ IJnivercitv nf Chimrm

CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY

1965

---_ .._ -.

CANAD IAN NAT I ONAL ELECT ION STUDY, 1965

ICPSR STUDY NUMBER 7225

Principal Investigators:

Philip Converse University of Michigan

Jokm Meisel Queen's University

Mmrice Pinard E&ill University

Peter Regenstreif university of Rochester

Mildred Schwartz NORC, University of Chicago

ICPSR Edition First Printing, 1972

Second Printing, 1978

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248

AnnArbor, Michigan 48106

ACJCNWLECGEWOFASSISTANCE

All manuscripts utilizing data mde available through the Consortium should acknowledge that fact as well as identify the original collector of the data. The ICPSR Council urges all users

of ICPSR data facilities to follow some adaptation of this state- ment with the parentheses indicating items to be filled in appro-

priately or deleted by the individual user.

The data (and tabulations) utilized in this (publication) were made available (in part) by the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. The data were originally collected by Philip Converse, John Meisel, Maurice Pinard, Peter Regenstreif, and Mildred Schwartz. Neither the original collectors of the data nor the Con- sortium bear any responsibility for the analyses or interpretations presented here.

In order to provide funding agencies with essential information

about the use of archival resources, and to facilitate the exchange of inform&ion about ICPSR participants' research activities, each user of the ICPSR data facilities is expected to send two copies of

each completed mmuscript or thesis abstract to the Consortium. Please indicate in the cover letter which data were used.

STUDY DESCRIPTION

THE 1365 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY @AS CONDUCTED BY PHILIP CONVERSE (THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN), JOHN MEISEL (QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY), MAURICE PINARD (MCGILL UNIVERSITY), PETER REGENSTREIF (UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER), AND MILDRED SCHWARTZ (NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER, THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO). THE RESPONDENTS NERE AD?lINISTERED A POST-ELECTION SURVEY DURING THE AUTUMN AND EARLY WINTER OF 1965-1966.

THE INTEFV_ZEW SCHEDULE, CONSISTING OF BOTH OPEN- AND CLOSED-ENDED QUESTIONS, SPANNED A VIDE AREA OF POLITICAL, SQCIOLOGICAL , AND PERSONAL DATA. THE MAIN THRUST OF THE INVESTIGATION 3AS DIRECTED TOHARD THE RESPONDENTS' POLITICAL ATTITUDES AND OPINIONS, AND THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF THE CANADIAN PARTIES, LEADERS, AND CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES.

OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS TAPPED THE RESPONDENTS' PERCEPTION OF T!-IE PROBLEMS CONFRONTING CANADA, WHICH OF THESE PROBLEMS RELATED PERSONALLY TO THEM, AND WHAT CAMPAIGN ISSUES WERE SAISED DURING THE ELECTION. THE STUDY CONTAINS CLOSED-ENDED QUES'rIONS WHICH PROBE THE RESPONDENTS' REACTIONS TO SPECIFIC ELECTION CONTROVERSIES. THE STANDARD VARIABLES ON POLITICAL EFFICACY AND CYNICISM TOWARDS GOVERNRENT WERE INCLUDED ALONG WTTH SOME QUESTIONS PERTAINING TO THE RESPONDENTS' PAST AND PRESENT FINANCIAL STATUS, AND HIS/HER EXPECTED FINANCIAL POSITION IN THE FUTURE AS A RESULT OF THE ELECTION OUTCOME,

PROVINCIAL AND REGIONAL CO?JFLICTS AND AFFINITIES HERE EXPLORED BY SEVERAL QUESTIONS INQUIRING WHICH PROVINCES WERE ZORE POFERFUL, BETTER OFF, AND WORSE OFF. PERCEPTIONS OF POLITICAL PARTIES (IN SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL FORM) WERE OBTAINED BY ASKING THE RESPONDENTS TO COMPARE THEIR '*IDEAL PARTY" WITH THE ACTUAL CANADIAN PARTIES, AND BY INQUIRING WHICH TWO FEDERAL PARTIES WERE "MOST ALIKE" IN THE RESPOND- ZNTS OPINION AND WHICH TWO WERE "LEAST ALIKE". RESPONDENTS WERE QUERIED ABOUT THE REGIONAL SOURCES OF POWER OF CONTEMPOR- ARY POLITICAL FIGURES IN A LIST, AND THEY WERE ASKED TO MENTION THEIR CHOICE OF PRIHE HINISTER. MANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE RESPONDENTS' POLITICAL PARTY ASSOCIATIONS AND ATTACHMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE STUDY. IF RESPONDENTS HAD CHANGED THEIR PARTY ATTACHMENT SOMETIHE IN THE PAST, OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS PROBED FOR THE CAUSES OF THE SHIFT. DATA CONCERNING THE RESPONDENTS' PREVIOUS VOTING BEHAVIOUR WERE SOLICITED AS NELL AS INFORMATION ON POLITICAL AND VOTING ACTIVITIES FOR 1965. ALSO, DATA WERE COLLECTED REGARDING THE RESPONDENTS' CAMPAIGN ACTIVITES, PARTY INVOLVEflENT, AND TIHE OR MONEY CONTRIBUTIONS AS WELL AS THE RESPONDENTS* ATTITUDES ABOUT CAHPAIGN FINANCING.

PERSONAL DATA INCLUDE THE STANDARD VARIABLES, SUCH AS EDUCATION, RELIGION, OCCUPATION, AND AGE, IN ADDITION TO VARIABLES SUCH AS MEMBERSHIP IN VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS AND THE INDIVIDUALS‘ MOBILITY WITHIN CANADA.

THL FOLLOWING YARIABLES WERE ASKED OF QUEBEC RESIDENTS ONLY: (1) THE RESPONDENTS' PRESENT AND FUTURE EVALUATION OF THE CAOUETTE WING OF THE SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY AND (2) FREQUENCY OF EXTRA-FAMILIAL ACQUAINTANCES.

SAMPLING INFORMATION

INDIVIDUALS INTERVIEWED FOR THE "1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY" FORM A STRATIFIED PROBABILITY CROSS-SECTXON SAMPLE OF THE CANADIAN POPULATION ELIGIULE TO VOTE IN 1965,

THE SAMPLE POPULATION WAS DRAWN FROM A EASE WHICH EXCLUDED APPROXIMATELY 7% OF THE CANADIAN POPULATION (DUE TO RESIDENCE IN CONSTITUENCIES WITH LOW ACCESSIBILITY), AND INCLUDED FROM THE REMAINING 93x, ONLY THOSE PERSONS ENUMERATED ON THF PRELIMINARY 1965 LIST OF VOTERS, FROM THE RESULTING POPULATION, CONSTITUENCIES WERE STRATIFIED ON THE BASIS OF THESE VARIABLES: (1) PROVINCE, (2) RURAL-URBAN DISTRIBUTION, AND (3) 1963 LIBERAL VOTING PERZENTAGES (EXCEPT IN RURAL ,QUEBEC ;JHERE THE CREDITISTE PERCENTAGES WERE SUBSTITUTED FOB LIBERAL).

CONSTITUENCIES IN WHICH INTERVIEWS WOULD BE TAKEN WERE SELECTED BY THE FOLLOWING METHOD:

1. AN INTERVAL (I) WAS CREATED BY DIVIDING THE TOTAL BASE POPULATION OF THE SAMPLE BY 121 (THE NUMBER OF SAMPLING CLUSTERS DESIRED AS OPTIBAL).

2. A RANDOM START NUMBER (R) WAS SELECTED WITHIN THAT INTERVAL.

3. THE INTERVAL VALUE AND THE RANDOM START NUMBER WERE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A NAME LIST OF THE TOTAL BASE POPULATION SUCH THAT CONSTITUENCIES IN WHICH THE VOTERS R, R+I, R+2I I---, R+1201 RESIDED WERE INCLUDED IN THE SAMPLE. THUS, THE FINAL SAMPLE INCLUDED 721 CLUSTERS; HOWEVER, THE POPULATION OF THREE CLUSTERS (HALIFAX, YORK-SCARBOROUGH, AND EDMONTON-STRATHCONA) WAS LARGE ENOUGH TO BE SAMPLED TWICE, WHICH EXPLAINS WHY ONLY 118 CONSTITUENCIES APPEAR IN THE SAMPLE,

THE SELECTION OF POLLING DIVISIONS WITHIN THE CHOSEN CONSTITUENCIES CONSTITUTED THE NEXT SAEPLING STEP. IT WAS CARRIED OUT AS FOLLOWS:

1, THE TOTAL NUMBER OF AVAILABLE POLLING DIVISIONS IN THE CONSTITUENCY WAS DIVIDED BY 28 AND ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST WHOLE NUMBER, THIS WAS THE INTERVAL I.

2. A RANDOR NUMBER BETWEEN 1 AND THIS INTERVAL WAS THEN CHOSEN. THIS WAS THE START NUMBER M.

3. POLLING DIVISIONS NUMBERED M, M+I, M+21... WERE

RECORDED UNTIL THE LIST OF POLLS WAS EXHAUSTED. THIS YIELDED 27, 28, OR 29 POLL NUMBERS PER CONSTITUENCY IN EVERY CASE. THE NUMBER OF VOTERS IN THE POLL WAS ENTERED BESIDE EACH POLL NUMBER AND THESE BERE LISTED IN ORDER AND TOTALLED.

4. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTERS WAS DIVIDED BY 7 (THE NUMBER OF POLLS TO BE FINALLY CHOSEN) TO YIELD A NEY INTERVAL (R).

5. A NEW RANDOM NUMBER (P) EQUAL TO OR LESS THAN THE NEW INTERVAL, R, WAS PICKED.

6. THE 7 POLLS PROM NHICH RESPONDENTS WERE SELECTED WERE OBTAINED BY STARTING AT THE POLLING DIVISION IN THE LIST NUMBERED P, AND INCLUDING THIS POLL AND P+R, P+2R, . . . . P+6R.

THE SELECTION OF THE INDIVIDUAL RESPONDENTS PROCEEDED AS FOLLOWS:

1. A RANDOM NUMBER BETWEEN 0 AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTERS ON THE LIST WAS SELECTED.

2. THE PERSON WHOSE NAME FELL BESIDE THAT NUMBER WAS SELECTED, AND THEREAFTER, EVERY 8TH PERSON (TO AVOID CHOOSING MORE THAN ONE MEMBER OF THE SAME FAMILY) UNTIL THERE WERE SIX NAMES. THE FIRST FOUR OF THESE WERE THE RESPONDENTS, THE OTHER TWO HERE SPARES TO BE INTERVIEWED ONLY IN THE EVENT THAT THE SAMPLE SIZE WOULD HAVE BEEN INCREASED.

THE INVESTIGATORS PROCEEDED FRON THE ASSUMPTION THAT 28 INTERVIEWS PER CLUSTER WOULD BE DESIRABLE. THE RESULT WAS AN ORIGINAL POTENTIAL SAHPLE SIZE OF 3388 NAMES. BEFORE THE ACTUAL INTERVIEW, EACH OF THESE INDIVIDUALS WAS BAILED A LETTER EXPLAINING THE PURPOSE OF THE SURVEY AND THE OBJECT OF THE INTERVIEW. THE INVESTIGATORS HOPED THAT THE LETTER WOULD YIELD A HIGHER RESPONSE RATE. THE ACTUAL FIELD WORK WAS ACCOMPLISHED BY CANADIAN FACTS, A COMMERCIAL MARKETING RESEARCH ORGANIZATION WITH A NATION-WIDE FIELD ORGANIZATION. THE INTERVIEWERS WERE INSTRUCTED TO MAKE THREE ATTEHPTS TO SURVEY EACH POTENTIAL RESPONDENT. IN CERTAIN AREAS (ESPECIAL- LY TORONTO, VANCOUVER, AND WINDSOR), A SECOND LETTER WAS SENT TO THE ORIGINAL POTENTIAL RESPONDENTS IN ORDER TO IMPROVE THE RESPONSE RATE. THE OVERALL RESPONSE RATE WAS APPROXIMATELY 62.5 PERCENT.

THE DATA FOR THIS STUDY ARE BASED ON 2118 COMPLETED INTERVIEWS. FIVE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES ORIGINALLY SCREENED FROM INCLUSION WERE RECENTLY REVIEWED, CODED AND ADDED TO THE STUDY. CONSEQUENTLY, THE UNWEIGHTED N OF 2118 Dl-FFEFS BY 5 FROB THE N OF 2113 REPORTED IN PUBLICATIONS SASED ON A DATA SOURCE PRIOR TO THE PRESENT RELEASE.

FOR A MORE DETAILED EXPLANATION OF THE SAMPLING HETHOD, THE USER SHOULD CONSULT JOHN MEISEL AND RICK VAN LOON, "CANADIAN ATTITUDES T(3 ELECTION EXPENSES 1965-1966". IN COMMITTEE ON ELECTION EXPENSES, STUDIES IN CANADIAN-PARTY FINANCE (OTTAiJA: QUEEN'S PRINTER, 1966), PP. 23-146,

WEIGHTING INPORMATION

T%O FORMS OF THE WEIGHT VARIABLE ARE PRESENT IN THE STUDY-- AN INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE AND A DECIMAL WEIGHT VARIABLE. BOTH VERSIONS CORRECT SAMPLING DEPFICIENCIES IN IDENTICAL FASHION, ONLY ONE OF THE VARIABLES USES INTEGER VALUES AND THE OTHER, DECIMAL NUMBERS. THE USER MUST DECIDE WHICH FORM OF THE ijEIGHT VARIABLE IS MOST DESIRABLE FOR THE ANALYSIS PROGRAMS AT HIS/HER COMPUTER INSTALLATION. BEAR TN MIND, HaWEVFR, THAT A VERSION OF THE WEIGHT VARIABLE HUST BE ALWAYS USED WHEN EXECUTING ANALYSIS PROGRAMS ON THE DATA.

!?EIGHT VARIABLE TYPE UNWEIGHTED N 2EIGHTED N

INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE (V3) 2118 8193

DECIMAL WEIGHT VARIABLE (V4) 2118 2729.04

PLEASE NOTE THAT IN SOME PUBLICATIONS THE WEIGHTED N (VEIGHTED BY THE DECIMAL WEIGHT VARXAELE) IS REPORTED AS 2596 INSTEAD OF 2729.04 AS REPORTED HERE. THIS DISCREPANCY STEMS IN PART FROM THE FACT THAT THE BRITISH COLUMBIA RESPONDENTS WERE ORIGINALLY WRONGLY NEIGHTED. THE DATA SET DISTRIBUTED BY THE CONSORTIUM CORRECTS THE WEIGHTS FOR THE BRITISH COLUlYBIA RESPONDENTS (ORIGINALLY 1, NOW 2) AS PER THE REQUEST OF PROFESSOR JOHN MEISEL.

PUBLICATIONS/PAPERS USING THE 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION DATA

JOHN MEISEL & RICK VAN LOON, "CANADIAN ATTITUDES TO ELECTION EXPENSES 1965-1966", IN COMMITTEE ON ELECTION EX- PENSES, STUDIES TN CANADIAN PARTY FINANCE (OTTAUA: QUEEN'S PRINTER, 1966), PP. 23-146.

RICK VAN LOON, "POLITICAL PARTICIPATION TN CANADA: THE 1965 ELECTION", CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE (111:3, SEPTEBBER, 1970). PP. 376-399.

RICK VAN LOON E MICHAEL WHITTINGTON, THE CANADIAN POLITICAL SYSTEM (SCARBOROUGH: MCGRAW-HILL OF CANADA, 1971), PASSIH.

MILDRED A. SCWARTZ, "CANADIAN VOTING BEHAVIOUR", IN RICHARD

ROSE (ED.1 , COMPARATIVE ELECTORAL BEHAVIOUR (NEW YORK: PREE PRESS, FORTHCOMING).

HILDRED A. SCWARTZ, THE: DIVISIONS OF CANADA (FORTHCOMING).

JOHN MEISEL, "DARTY IMAGES IN CANADA: A REPORT ON WORK IN PRO- GRESS", UORKING PAPERS IN CANADIAN POLITICS (MCGILL -QUEEN'S PRESS, 1972).

RICK VAN LOON, CANADIAN ELECTORAL PARTICIPATION (UNPUBLISHED PH,D, THESIS, QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY, 1968).

PHILIP E. CONVERSE, GEORGES DWPEUX E JOHN MEISEL, "CONTINW- ITIES IN POPULAR POLITICAL CULTURE: FRENCH AND ANGLO-SAXON CONTRASTS IN CANADA". (UNPUBLISHED PAPER PRESENTED AT THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 09 COMPARATIVE ELECTORAL BEHAVIOUR, HELD AT THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN IN APRIL, 1967).

PROCESSING INFORMATION

THE STUDY WAS PROCESSED ACCORDING TO ICPR-SURVEY RESEARCti ARCHIVE PROCESSING PROCEDURES. CODE CATEGORIES WERE RECC?DED TO ELIMINATE AMPS, DASHES, AND BLANKS PRESENT IN THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTATION. "MISSING DATA", RELIGION, AND COUNTRY CODES WERE RECODED TO CONFORN TO ICPR STANDARDIZED CODES. A LIMITED NUMBER OF WILD CODES HERE ENCOUNTERED IN OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS AND CORRECTED BY INSPECTING THE QUESTIONNAIRE OF THE RESPOND- ENTS INVOLVED. SOME VARIABLES WERE REFORMATTED TO ACCOEPLISH YORE EFFICIENT ACCESS OF THE DATA FOR THE USER, OR ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION OF THE DATA.

V260-V262 AND V294-V295 ARE VARIABLES WHICH !JERE REFORBATTED TO FACILITATE THE USER'S ACCESS TO THE DATA. EACH OF THESE VARIABLES CONSISTS OF TN0 OR MORE SETS OF QUESTIONS ASKED OF DIFFERENT GROUPS OF RESPONDENTS, UITH EACH SET OF QUESTIONS FOLLOWING A CONSTRUCTION PARALLEL TO THE OTHER ONE(S). RATHER THAN PROVIDE THE USER WITH SEVERAL VARIABLES WHICH MUST BE ACCESSED INDIVIDUALLY IN ORDER TO DETERMINE THE TOTALITY OF THE INFORMATION, THE COMPARABLE QUESTIONS FRON THE VARIOUS SETS HAVE BEEN CONSOLIDATED IN SINGLE VARIABLES WITH A UNIFORN CODING SCHEME.

V13-V23, V57-V84, V86-V105, AND v316-V326 ARE VARIABLES REFORMATTED TO ACCOBPLISH ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION OF THE CODING SCHEME. FOR EXAMPLE, SEVERAL CLUSTERS OF VARIABLES SANPLE THE RESPONDENT'S OPINIONS OF THE VARIOUS PROVINCES. THE RESPONDENT WAS NOT SPECIFICALLY PROBED CONCERNING EACH INDIVIDUAL PROVINCE, BUT RATHER HE RESPONDED %ITH THE NAMES OF THE PROVINCES THAT CAME TO HIS HIND, AS THOUGH THE QUESTION WERE OPEN-ENDED. FOR ANY GIVEN PROVINCE, THE ANSWERS OF THE RESPONDENTS WHO DID NOT MENTION THAT PARTICULAR PROVINCE BUT RESPONDED TO THE QUESTION WITH OTHER NANES WERE SEPARATED IN THE CODING SCHEME FROH THE CATEGORIES OF "NA" OR "INAP" WHERE

THEY HAD PREVIOUSLY RESIDED.

FREQUENCIES

FREQUENCIES FOR ALL VARIABLES IN THIS CODEBOOK HAVE BEEN INSERTED EITHER TO THE LEFT OF THE CODE VALUE (SEE 12 IN THE CODEBOOK INFORMATION SECTION) OR DIRECTLY UNDER THE LAST CODE DESCRIPTION. THE FREQUENCIES PROVIDED IN THIS CODZBOOK ARE WEIGHTED BY THE INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE (VAR- IABLE 3)s

CODEBOOK INFORHATION

THE EXABPLE BELOW IS A REPRODUCTION (NOT ACTUAL SIZE) OF INFORMATION APPEARING IN THE MACHINE-READABLE CODEBOOK FOR A TYPICAL VARIABLE. THE NUMBERS IN CIRCLES DO NOT APPEAR IN THE CODEBOOK, BUT ABE REFERENCES TO THE DESCRXPTIONS NHTcH FOLLOW THIS EXAMPLE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..*......................

a REP 0014 0 DATA

32 PURFL? @ ?lD=O OR GE 8

WIDTH 1 0 7 DK 1 COL

SET ID='7225' ------B___

@-------

0 9 NEWFOUNDLAND MORE POWERFUL? <SEE REF. NO. 13) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..*.........

@J ----- ------

0 -__--------

154

4561

1. R MENTIONS NEWFOUNDLAND AS MORE POWERFUL

5. R DOES NOT MENTION NEWFOUNDLAND

66 8. YES, SOME PROVINCIAL GOVERNHENTS MORE POWERFUL, BUT DK (DON'T KNOW) WHICH PROVINCES ARE MORE POWERFUL.

4 9. REF. NOS. 14-23 NA {NOT ASCERTAINED) 3408 0. INAP. (INAPPLICABLE), CODED

2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1. INDICATES THE VARIARLE AND REFERENCE NUilBERS. A VARIABLE AND A REFERENCE NUMBER ARE ASSIGNED TO EACH ITEM IN THE STUDY. IN THE PRESENT CODEBOOK, WHICH DOCUPlENTS THE ARCHIVED DATASET, THESE NUMBERS ARE IDENTICAL. SHOULD THE DATA BE SUBSETTED OR REARRANGED BY AN OSIRIS PROGRAM (E.G., HfiP2 TO INTERSPERSE DATA FROM ANOTHER SOURCE, OR TCOT2 TO PRODUCE AN ANALYSIS DECK), THE VARIABLE NUMBERS WOULD CHANGE TO REFLECT THE ORDER OF THE NEW DATASET, UHILE THE REFERENCE NUMBERS WOULD REMAIN UNCHANGED TO REFLECT THE VARIABLE NUMBER IN THE CODEBOOK DESCRIBING THE ARCHIVED DATASET.

2. INDICATES THE FOUR COLUBN ICPR STUDY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER UNIQUE TO THIS DATASET.

3. INDICATES THE ABBREVIATED (24 CHARACTERS MAXIMUM) VARIABLE NAME USED WITHIN THE OSIRIS SYSTEM TO IDENTIFY THE

::

i).

5.

6.

7.

a.

9.

10.

11.

12,

13.

14.

VARIABLE FOR THE USER, AN EXPANDED VERSION OF THESE NAMES CAN SE FOUND IN THE TABLE OF CONTENTS, WHERE AN 1x1 PRE- CEDES THE NAME OF A VARIABLE CONTINGENT ON ANOTHER VARIA3LE DUE TO THE STRUCTURE OF THE INTERVIEK SCHEDULE.

INDICATES THE DESIGNATION OF MISSING DATA. IN THIS EXAMPLE CODE VALUES EQUAL TO ZERO OR GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO EIGHT ARE MISSING DATA (MD=0 OR GE 8). ALTERN- ATIVE STATEMENTS FOR OTHER VARIABLES ARE OF THE FORM "ED=GF: 90", OR “NO MISSING DATA CODES", SOtiE ANALYSIS SOFTKARE PACKAGES (INCLUDING THE OSIRIS SOFTWARE PACK- AGE) REQUIRE THAT CERTAIN TYPES OF DATA WHICH THE USER DESIRES TO EXCLUDE FROM ANALYSIS BE DESIGNATED AS "MISSING DATA", E.G., INAPPROPRIATE, UNASCERTAINED, UNASCERTAINABLE 3R AMBIGUOUS DATA CATEGORIES. ALTHOUGH THESE CATEGORIES ARE DEFINED AS MISSING DATA CATEGCRIES, THIS DOES NOT fiEAN THAT A USER SHOULD NOT OR CANNOT USE THESE CODES IN A SUBSTANTIVE ROLE IF HE SO DESIRES.

A MULTIPLE RESPONSE VARIABLE IS DENOTED BY THE MESSAGE, "MULT RESPS X" , #HERE X IS THE NUflBER OF RESPONSES,

INDICATES THE STARTING LOCATION AND WIDTH OF THIS VARIAaLE 2HEN THE DATA ARE STORED ON A MAGNETIC TAPE IN THE OSIRIS ?ORMAT. IF THE VARIASLE IS A MULTIPLE RESPONSE ITEM, THE STARTING LOCATION AND WIDTH ALLUDE TO THE FIRST RESPONSE CODED,

INDICATES THE LOCATION BY DECK AND COLUMN(S) OF THIS VARIABLE WHEN THE DATA ARE ON CARDS OR IN CARD IMAGE FORM (EITHER 80 OR 84 COLUMN FORMAT)

A VARIABLE CONTAINING DATA WITH IMPLIED DECIMALS IS DENOTED BY THE MESSAGE "XX DEC PLACE(S)", WHERE XX IS THE NUMBER OF DECIMAL PLACES IMPLIED (NOT PUNCHED) IN THE VARIABLE.

INDICATES 'THE FULL TEXT (QUESTION) SUPPLIED BY THE INVESTIGATOR TO DESCRIBE THE VARIABLE.

INDICATES AN ADDITIONAL COMMENT OR EXPLANATION APPENDED TO THE VARIABLE DESCRIPTION.

A VARIABLE WHICH HAS A FOOTNOTE ASSOCIATED WITH IT IS DENOTED BY THE MESSAGE, "SEE NOTE(S) X", WHERE X IS THE NUMBER OF THE FOOTNOTE REFERENCED.

INDICATES THE FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF EACH CODE VALUE- FREQUENCIES FOR MULTIPLE RESPONSE VARIABLES ARE CUMULATIVE.

INDICATES THE CODE VALUES OCCURRING IN THE DATA FOR THIS VARIABLE.

INDICATES THE TEXTUAL DEFINITIONS OF THE CODES.

CONTENTS

VARIABLE VARIABLE NAME PAGE NUMBER NO.

1 ICPR STUDY NUfiBER-7225 2 INTERVIEN NUMBER

WEIGHT AND GEOGRAPHIC DATA

3 INTEGER HEIGHT VARIABLE 4 DECIMAL WEIGHT VARIABLE 5 PROVINCE OF INTERVIEW 6 CONSTITUENCY OF INTERVIEB 7 SIZE OF PLACE

1

NATIONAL PROBLEMS

8 PROBLEMS FACING CANADA 7 9 NATIONAL PROBLEMS OF SPECIAL CONCERN TO R 8

10 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT THE ELECTION OUTCOME 10 11 XEXTRA FEELINGS TOWARD THE ELECTION OUTCOME 11 12 LEVEL OF GOV'T HANDLING PROBLEMS:FEDERAL/PROVINCE 12

PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS: POWER & INFLUENCE

13 ANY PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT POWERFUL 14 XNEWFOUNDLAND - POWER 15 XPRINCE EDWARD ISLAND - POWER 16 XNOVA SCOTIA - POWER 17 XNEW BRUNSWICK - POWER 18 XQUEBEC - POWER 19 XONTARIO - POWER 20 XMANITOBA - POWER 21 XSASKATCHEWAN - POWER 22 XALBERTA - POWER 23 XBRITISH COLUMBIA - PONER

24 LEVEL OF GOV'T MORE INFLUENTIAL TO R

25 R'S OPINION OF WHAT ELECTION ISSUES WERE 26 IMPORTANCE OF SOCIAL WELFARE ISSUE TO R 17 27 IMPORTANCE OF ECONOMIC ISSUES TO R 18 28 IMPORTANCE OF ENGLISH-FRENCH CANADIANS RELATIONS 29 IMPORTANCE OF FLAG ISSUE TO R 19 30 IMPORTANCE OF CANADIAN UNITY TO R 31 IMPORTANCE OF CORRUPTION IN GOV'T TO R 32 IHPORTANCE OF MAJORITY GOV'T ISSUE TO R 20

13

14

15

16

ELECTION ISSUES AND THEIR IMPORTANCE TO R

CONTENTS

VARIABLE VARIABLE NAME NUMBER

PAGE NO.

33

34 35 36

?7 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47

48 49 SO 51 52 53

57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67

IMPORTANCE OF STRONG LEADERSHIP TO R

MAJORITY GOV'T MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE TO R WOULD R CHANGE VOTE TO SUPPORT MAJORITY GOV'T R'S INTEREST IN POLITICS

POLITICAL EFFICACY G CYNICISM

PEOPLE IN GOV'T ARE CROOKED GCV’T WASTES R'S TAX MONEY HOW OFTEN CAN R TRIJST THE GOV'T DOES EVERYONE RECEIVE A FAIR BREAK FROM GOV'T GOV'T OFFICIALS KNOW NHAT TO DO VOTING EFFECTIVE PI)LITICAL WEAPON GOV'T DOES NOT CARE ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE R POLITICS TOO DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND PEOPLE LIKE R HAVE NO SAY IN GOV'T ELECTED OFFICIALS LOSE TOUCH WITH CONSTITUENCY TOO MANY INTELLECTUALS IN GOV'T

RESPONDENT'S FINANCIAL SITUATION

R SATISFIED WITH PERSONAL FINANCIAL SITUATION HAS R'S FINANCIAL SITUATION IMPROVED IN PAST YES DOES R'S FINANCIAL SITUATION LOOK FAVORABLE WILL R'S FINANCIAL SITUATION IMPROVE IN FUTURE DOES ELECTION AFFECT R'S FINANCIAL SITUATION XWILL ELECTION EFFECT BE BETTER/WORSE ON R'S FINANCIAL SITUATION HAS R BEEN UNEMPLOYED IN PAST YEAR HAS ANY FAMILY MEMBER BEEN UNEMPLOYED PAST YEAR R/FAMILY MEMBER BEEN UNEMPLOYED IN LAST 3 YEARS

PROVINCES BETTER OFF

ANY PROVINCES BETTER OFF THAN OTHERS XNEWFOUNDLAND - BETTER OFF XPRINCE EDWARD ISLAND - BETTER OFF XNOVA SCOTIA - BETTER OFF XNEW BRUNSWICK - BETTER OFF XQUEBEC - BETTER OFF XONTARIO - BETTER OFF XHANITOBA - BETTER OFF XSASKATCHEBAN - BETTER OFF XALBERTA - BETTER OFF XBRITISH COLUMBIA - BETTER OFF

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

31

32

CONTENTS


68 XMARITIMES - BETTER OFF 69 XPRAIRIES - BETTER OFF 70 XSPECIFIC REGIONS - BETTER OFF

PROVINCES WORSE OFF

71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 a2 83 84 85

ANY PROVINCES WORSE OFF THAN OTHFRS XNEWFOUNDLAND - WORSE OFF XPRINCE EDWARD ISLAND - WORSE OFF XNOVA SCOTIA - NORSE OFF XNEW BRUNSWICK - HORSE OFF XQUEBEC - WORSE OFF XONTARIO - WORSE OFF XMANITOBA - WORSE OFF XSASKATCHEWAN - WORSE OFF XALBERTA - WORSE OFF XBRITISH COLUMBIA - WORSE OFF XMARITIMES - WORSE OFF XPRAIRIES - WORSE OFF XSPECIFIC REGIONS - WORSE OFF XR'S PROVINCE BETTER OR WORSE OFF

PROVINCES IN WHICH R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE

86 XNEWFOUNDLAND - R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 87 XPRINCE EDWARD ISLAND - R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 88 XNOVA SCOTIA - R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 89 XNEW BRUNSWICK - R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 90 XQUEBEC - R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 91 XONTARIO - R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 92 XMANITOBA - R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 93 XSASKATCHEWAN - R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 94 XALBERTA -- R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 95 XBRITISH COLUMBIA - R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN

PROVINCES IN WHICH R WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE

96 XNEWFOUNDLAND - R WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN 97 XPRINCE EDWARD ISLAND -R WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE 98 XNOVA SCOTIA - R WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN 99 XNEW BRUNSWICK - R WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN

100 XQLJEBEC - R WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN 101 XONTARIO - R WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN 102 XMANXTOBA - R WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN 103 XSASKATCHEWAN - R WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN

PAGE NO.

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

IN45

46

47

CONTENTS

VARIABLE VARIABLE NAME 'PAGE NUMBER NO,

104 105

106 XDIEFENBAKEH-- MARITIMES CONNECTIONS 107 XDIEFENBAKER--QUEBEC CONNECTIONS 108 XDIEPENBAKER--ONTARIO CONNECTIONS 109 XDIEFENBAKER-- PRAIRIES CONNECTIONS 110 XDIEFENBAKER-- BRITISH COLUMBIA CONNECTIONS

111 112 113 114 115

116 117 118 119 120

121 XTHOMPSON-- MARITIMES CONNECTIONS 122 XTHOMPSON--QUEBEC CONNECTIONS 123 XTHOMPSON-- ONTARIO CONNECTIONS 124 XTHOMPSON--PRAIRIES CONNECTIONS 125 XTHO?lPSON-- BRITISH COLUBBIA CONNECTIONS

126 127 128 129 130

XALBERTA - R WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN XBRITISH COLUMBIA - R WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN

DIEFENBAKER'S CONNECTIONS

48

49

PEARSON'S CONNECTIONS

XPEARSON-- MARITIME!3 CONNECTIONS XPEARSON--QUEBEC CONNECTIONS XPEARSON--ONTARIO CONNECTIONS XPEARSON-- PRAIRIES CONNECTIONS XPEARSON-- BRITISH COLUMBIA CONNECTIONS

50

51

DOUGLAS' CONNECTIONS

XDQUGLAS-- MARITIMES CONNECTIONS XDOUGLAS--QUEBEC CONNECTIONS XDOUGLAS-- ONTARIO CONNECTIONS XDOUGLAS-- PRAIRIES CONNECTIONS XDOUGLAS--BRITISH COLUMBIA CONNECTIONS

52

53

THOMPSON'S CONNECTIONS

55

56

CAOUETTE'S CONNECTIONS

XCAOUETTE-- MARITIMES CONNECTIONS XCAOUETTE--QUEBEC CONNECTIONS XCAOUETTE--ONTARIO CONNECTIONS XCAOUETTE-- PRAIRIES CONNECTIONS XCAOUETTE-- BRITISH COLUHBIA CONNECTIONS

57

58

CONTENTS


1'3 1 BEST PRIME MINISTER FOR CANADA

FEDERAL PARTIES: SINILARITIES & DIFFERENCES

132 ANY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE FEDERAL PARTIES 133 WHICH FEDERAL PARTTES MOST ALIKE 134 WAICH FEDERAL PARTIES LEAST ALXKE 135 DOES IT MATTER WHICH PARTY RUNS THE COUNTRY

R'S CONCEPT OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA

136 XOUT OF DATE/MODERN-IDEAL PARTY 137 XCOMPETENT/INCOMPETENT-IDEAL PARTY 138 XPOWERFUL/WEAK-IDEAL PARTY 139 XFOOLISH/UTSE-IDEAL PARTY 140 XFOR MIDDLE CLASS/FOR WORKING CLASS-IDEAL PARTY 141 XUNITED/SPLIT-IDEAL PARTY 142 XBAD/GOOD-IDEAL PARTY 143 XLEFT/RIGHT-IDEAL PARTY 144 XSTRONG-MINDED/WEAK-MINDED-IDEAL PARTY 145 XHONEST/DISHONEST-IDEAL PABTY 146 XDULL/EXCITING-IDEAL PARTY 147 XYOUNG/OLD-IDEAL PARTY 148 XSLOW/FAST-IDEAL PARTY

149 150 151 152 153

154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161

R'S CHOICE OF PRIME MINISTER

R'S CONCEPT OF LIBERAL PARTY

XOUT OF DATE/MODERN-LIBERAL PARTY XCOMPETENT/INCOMPETENT-LIBERAL PARTY XPOWERFUL/YEAK-LIBERAL PARTY XFOOLISH/WISE-LIBERAL PARTY XFOR MIDDLE CLASS/FOR WORKING CLASS-LIBERAL PARTY XUNITED/SPLIT-LIBERAL PARTY XBAD/GOOD-LIBERAL PARTY XLEFT/RIGHT-LIBERAL PARTY XSTAONG-MINDED/WEAK-HINDED-LIBERAL PARTY XHONEST/DISHONEST-LIBERAL PARTY XDULL,'EXCITING-LIBERAL PARTY XYOUNG/OLD-LIBERAL PARTY XSLOW/FAST-LIBERAL PARTY

59

60 61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

CONTENTS

VARIABLE VARIABLE NAME PAGE N u M B E R NO.

162 163 164 165 166

167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174

XOUT OF DATE/MODERN-CONSERVATIVE PARTY XCOMPETENT/INCOMPETENT-CONSERVATIVE PARTY XPOWERFUL/BEAK-CONSERVATIYE PARTY XFOOLISH/WISE-CONSERVATIVE PARTY XFOR MIDDLE CLASS/FOR WORKING CLASS-CONSERVA- TIVE PARTY XUNITED/SPLIT-CONSERVATIVE PARTY XBAD/GOOD-CONSERVATIVE PARTY XLEFT/RIGHT-CONSERVATIVE PARTY XSTRONG-MINDED/WEAK-HINDED-CONSERVATIVE PARTY XHONEST/DISHONEST-CONSERVATIVE PARTY XDlJLL/EXCITING-CONSERVATIVE PARTY XYOUNG/OLD-CONSERVATIVE PARTY XSLOR/PAST-CONSERVATIVE PARTY

R'S CONCEPT OF NEW DEMOCRATIC PARTY

175 XOUT OF DATE/MODERN-NDP PARTY 176 XCOMPETENT/INCOMPETENl'-NDP PARTY 177 XPOWERPUL/NEAK-NDP PARTY 178 XFOOLISH/WISE-NDP PARTY 173 XFOR MIDDLE CLASS/FOR WORKING CLASS-NDP PARTY 190 XUNITED/SPLIT-NDP PARTY Ial XBAD/GOOD-NDP PARTY 182 XLEF'T/RIGHT-NDP PARTY 183 XSTRONG-MINDED/WEAK-MINDED-NDP PARTY 184 XHONEST/DISHONEST-NDP PARTY 1a5 XDULL/EXCITING-NDP PARTY 186 XYOUNG/OLD-NDP PARTY 187 XSLOU/FAST-NDP PARTY

R'S CONCEPT OF SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY

1’38 189 190 191 192

193 194 195 196 197

XOUT OF DATE/MODERN-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY XCOMPETENT/INCOMPETENT-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY XPOWERFUL/ilEAK-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY XFOOLISH/UISE-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY XFOR MIDDLE CLASS/FOR WORKING CLASS-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY XUNITED/SPLIT-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY XBAD/GOOD-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY XLEFT/RIGHT-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY XSTRONG-MINDED/WEAK-MXNDED-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY XHONEST/DISHONEST-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY

R'S CONCEPT OF CONSERVATIVE PARTY

73

74

75

76

77

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

CONTENTS


198 XDULL/EXCXTING-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY 199 XYOUNG/OLD -SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY 200 XSLOW/FAST-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY

201 202 203 204 205

206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213

214 215 216 217 218

219

220

221 R'S PARTY IDENTIPICATION 222 XSTRENGTH OF R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION 223 XR EVER CLOSER TO ANOTHER PARTY 224 XCHOSEN PARTY ID-NATIONAL/PROVINCIAL LEVEL 225 X(IF NATIONAL), R'S PROVINCIAL PARTY ID 226 X(IP PROVINCIAL), R'S NATXONAL PARTY ID 227 X(NON-ID), CLOSER TO ANY PARTY 228 XCHOSEN CLOSER PARTY-NATIONAL/PROVINCIAL LEVEL

R'S CONCEPT OF CREDITISTE PARTY

XOUT OF DATE/MODERN-CREDITISTE PARTY XCOMPETENT/INCOMPETENT-CREDITISTE PARTY XPOAERFUL/WEAK-CREDITISTE PARTY XFOOLISH/WISE-CREDITISTE PARTY XFOR MIDDLE CLASS/FOR WORKING CLASS-CREDITISTE PARTY XUNITED/SPLIT-CREDTTISTE PARTY XBAD/GOOD-CREDITISTE PARTY XLEPT,'RIGHT-CREDITISTE PARTY XSTRDNG-MINDED/WEAK-MINDED-CREDITISTE PARTY XHONFST/DISHONEST-CREDITISTE PARTY XDULL/EXCITING-CREDITISTE PARTY XYOUNG/OLD-CREDITISTE PARTY XSLOU,'FAST-CREDITISTE PARTY

PERFORMANCE OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT: R'S EVALUATIONS

ACTIONS OF LIBERAL MP'S-R'S EVALUATIONS ACTIONS OF CONSERVATIVE MP'S-R'S EVALUATIONS ACTIONS OF NDP MP'S-R'S EVALUATIONS ACTIONS OF SOCIAL CREDIT MP'S-R'S EVALUATIONS ACTIONS OF CAOUETTE'S GROUP IN PARLIAMENT-R'S EVALUATIONS

(QUEBEC ONLY) HAS CAOUETTE'S SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY DONE BETTER THAN OTHERS X(QUEBEC ONLY) CHANCES CAOUETTE'S SOCIAL CREDIT COME TO POWER IN 10 YEARS

R'S PAST AND PRESENT PARTY IDENTIFICATXON

PAGE NO.

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

CONTENTS

VARKABLE VARIABLE NAME PAGE NUMBER NO,

229 X(IF NATIONAL), PARTY CLOSE TO IN PROVINCE 102 230 X(IF PROVINCIAL), PARTY CLOSE TO AT FEDERAL LEVEL 231 X(NON-ID), EVER CLOSER TO ANOTHER PARTY 103 232 X(N0 ID), R EVER FEEL CLOSE TO A PARTY 105 233 XWHEN DID R CHANGE PARTY AFFILIATION 234 XWHY R CHANGED PARTY AFPILIATION 106 235 R'S SECOND CHOICE OF FEDERAL PARTIES 107 236 WHICH FEDERAL PARTY R NANTS LEAST TO VOTE FOR

237

23%

239

240 FATHER'S INTEREST IN POLLITICS 241 XFATHER'S PARTY PREFERENCE 242 MOTHER'S INTEREST IN POLITICS 243 XMOTHER'S PARTY PREFERENCE

244

245

246

247

248

249

250 251 252 253

R'S VOTING DECISIONS

PARTY, LEADER OR CANDIDATE-WHICH MOST IMPORTANT CRXTERION FOR VOTE DECISION 108 VOTE ALLEGIANCE TO PARTY IF BAD CONSTITUENCY CANDIDATE VOTE ALLEGIANCE TO PARTY IF IT FAVORS BAD POLICIES 109

R'S PARENTS POLITICAL INTEREST E IDENTIFICATION

170

R'S KNOWLEDGE OF THE CANDIDATES

R KNOW NAME OF CANDIDATE WINNING IN CONSTITUENCY 111 R KNOW PARTY OF CANDIDATE WINNING IN CONSTITUENCY R READ/HEARD ABOUT CANDIDATE WINNING IN CONSTITUENCY 112 XWHAT DID R READ/HEAR ABOUT CANDIDATE WINNING IN CONSTITUENCY WAS WINNING CANDIDATE AN INCUMBENT IN R'S CONSTITUENCY 113 {IF 1NCUMBENT)HA.S CANDIDATE DONE ANYTHING FOR CONSTITUENCY (TF 1NCUMBENT)HAS CANDIDATE DONE ANYTHING FOR R DOES R REMEMBER NAMES OF ANY OTHER CANDIDATES 114 DOES R REMEMBER PARTY OF ANY OTHER CANDIDATES DOES R READ/HEAR ANYTHING ABOUT OTHER CANDIDATES 115

VARIABLE NIJMBER

254 255

256

257

258

259

260 261

262 263 264 , 265 266 267 268

269 270

271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282

CONTENTS

VARIABLE NAME

R'S PAST VOTING BEHAVIOR

HOW OFTEN R HAS VOTED IN PAST FEDERAL ELECTIONS XHAS R VOTED FOR SAME PARTY IN PAST FEDERAL ELECTIONS XWHICH SANE PARTY R HAS VOTED FOR IN PAST FEDERAL ELECTIONS HOW OFTEN R HAS VOTED IN FAST PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS XHAS R VOTED FOR SAME PARTY IN PAST PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS XWHICH SAME PARTY R HAS VOTED FOR IN PAST PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS

(QUEBEC ONLY) R'S VOTE IN 1962 R'S VOTE IN 1963

1965 VOTING BEHAVIOR

R'S VOTE IN 1965 XWHEN R DECIDED 1965 VOTE Xl965 VOTE DECISION EASY/NOT EASY XWHY 1965 VOTE DECISION NOT EASY XR USED HELP TO CAST 1965 BALLOT XWHY R CHANGED VOTE FROM 1963 TO 1965 XANY SPECIAL REASON FOR 1965 VOTE

120

121 122

123

PARTY VOTED FOR IN LAST PROVINCIAL ELECTION 124

PAGE NO,

116

117

118

179

NATIONAL/PROVINCIAL/LOCAL-MOST IBPORTANT ELECTION125

R'S CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES

R ATTENDED ANY POLITICAL MEETINGS XHOW MANY POLITICAL MEETINGS R ATTENDED 126 R READ ANY SPEECHES OR LEAFLETS ANY PARTIES CALLED ON R 128 XCONSERVATIVE PARTY CALLED ON R XLIBERAL PARTY CALLED ON R 129 XNDP CALLED ON R XSOCIAL CREDIT PARTY CALLED ON R 130 XOTHER PARTY CALLED ON R DID R PERSONALLY HELP ANY CANDIDATE 131 DID R TRY TO INFLUENCE OTHERS R BELONG TO ANY POLITICAL ORGANIZATION


POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND FINANCES: R'S OPINIONS

283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292

R KNOW OF ANY FUND RAISING DID R ASK ANYONE FOR CONTRIBUTION WAS R/FAMILY MEMBER ASKED FOR CONTRIBUTION XWHO WAS ASKED FOR CONTRIBUTION-R/FARILY MEMBER XCONSERVATIVES ASKED FOR MONEY XLIBERALS ASKED FOR MONEY XNDP ASKED FOR MONEY

132

133

134

XSOCIAL CREDIT PARTY ASKED FOR MONEY XOTHER PARTY ASKED FOR MONEY BANNER IN WHICH R HAS APPROACRED FOR POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION

135

293 294 295 296

DID R KNOW CANVASSER PERSONALLY WHICH PARTY DID R CONTRIBUTE TO DID ANY OTHER FAMILY MEflBER GIVE TO PARTY IF R HAD BEEN ASKED, NOULD HAVE GIVEN POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION

136

137

297 298

WOULD R PREFER TO DONATE TIME OR HONEY TO PARTY R'S OPINION OF BUSINESS AND UNION POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS

138

299 SHOULD POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION BE TAX DEDUCTIBLE 300 SHOULD PARTIES PUBLISH CABPAFGN EXPENSES 301 SHOULD PARTIES DISCLOSE THEIR CONTRIBUTORS 302 SHOULD PARTIES DISCLOSE AMOUNTS CONTRIBUTED 303 SHOULD GOV'T PAY CAMPAIGN EXPENSES

139

140

PERSONAL DATA

304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315

R'S HARITAL STATUS IDENTITY OF FAMILY'S MAIN PROVIDER EAIN EARNER'S OCCUPATION R'S EDUCATION R'S PERCEIVED SOCIAL CLASS R'S RELIGION XR'S CHURCH ATTENDANCE COUNTRY OF R'S ANCESTORS R'S COUNTRY OF BIRTH XYEAR R IMMIGRATED TO CANADA LANGUAGE MOST OFTEN SPOKEN AT HOME SIZE OF PLACE WHERE R GRER UP

141

142

143

144

145

146

NUMBER

R'S MOBILITY

316 R EVER LIVE IN ANOTHER PROVINCE 317 XNEWFOUNDLAND-MOBILITY 318 XPRINCE EDBARD ISLAND-NOBILITY 319 XNOVA SCOTIA-MOBILITY 320 XNEW BRUNSWICK-MOBILITY 321 XQUEBEC-MOBILITY 322 XONTARIO-MOBILITY 323 XMANITOBA-MOBILITY 324 XSASKATCHEWAN-MOBILITY 325 XALBERTA-MOBILITY 326 XBRITISH COLUMBIA-MOBILITY

R'S GROUP ASSOCIATIONS

327 XR BELONG TO LABOR UNION 328 XR BELONG TO TRADE ASSOCIATION 329 XR BELONG TO FARM ORGANIZATION 330 XR BELONG TO PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 331 XR BELONG TO OTHER VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATION

332

333

334

(QUEBEC ONLY) HAS R VISITED ANOTHER'S HOME LAST WEEK X(QUEBEC ONLY) HAVE OTHERS VISITED R AT HOBE DURING LAST WEEK X(QUEBEC ONLY) HAS R BEEN OUT WITH OTHERS DURING LAST WEEK

335 R'S AGE 336 FAMILY INCOME GROUP 337 R'S SEX

CONTENTS

VARIABLE VARIABLE NAME

QUESTIONNAIRE SECTION

1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION QUEST :ONNAIRE 159

PAGE NO.

147

148

149

150

152

153

154

155

156

1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 1

VAR 0001 REP 0001 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-ICPR STUDY NUMBER-7225 NO RISSING DATA CODES

LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 1COL l-4

STUDY NURBER (7225) *~I~.......~...~...

VAR 0002 REP 0002 DATA SET ID-'72251 NANE-INTERVIEW NUBBER NO MISSING DATA CODES

LOC 5 RIDTH 5 DK 1 COL 5- 9

RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

THE FIRST DIGIT IDENTIFIES TBE PROVINCE AS CODED IN VARIABLE FIVE; THE NEXT FOUR DIGITS ARE THE RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUHBER WITHIN THE PROVINCE. ALL FIVE DIGITS ARE NEEDED TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY A RESPONDENT. ..-........_._...........-............-..-.........-....-...

VAR 0003 REP 0003 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAHE-INTEGER AEIGAT VARIABLE NO HISSING DATA CODES

LOC 10 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 10

INTEGER WEIGHT VALUES

RESPONDENTS WERE UEIGHTED ACCORDING TO THEIR CONSTITUENCY OF RESIDENCE. ALL SUBJECTS LIVING IN CONSTITUENCY #049 (ALGOBA WEST, ONTARIO) THROUGH to80 (YENTYORTH, ONTAEIO) YERE UEIGHTED BY A FACTOR OF ONE AND ONE-THIRD. RESIDENTS OF tO40 (CARTIER, QUEBEC) TBRU lo46 (SAINT-JACQUES, QUEBEC) (INCLUSIVE), to81 (YORK CENTRE, ONTARIO) THRIJ to88 (ROSEDALE, ONTARIO), AND ALL RESPONDENTS FEOH BRITISH COLURBIA UERE DOUBLE UEIGHTED. THE REST OF TBE CONSTITUENCIES ARE UNUEIGHTED. SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 4 AND 6.

TAE FREQUENCIES REPORTED POE THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNYEIGHTED (RAW) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUNBER OF DATA CASES. . . . ..*.*.....*.....-..-..........-.-.--.......*....-.-......

1113 3. UNWEIGUTED CASES 588 4. REIGHTED ONE AND ONE-TAIRD (CONSTITUENCIES #049-tO80) 417 6. DOUBLE WEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES tOUO-C048, t081-

t088, AND #ill-tll8)


VAR 0004 REF 0004 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAilE-DECIMAL UEIGHT VARIABLE NO BISSING DATA CODES

LOC 11 UIDTH 3 DK 1 COL 11-13 2 DEC PLACE(S)

DECIHAL WEIGHT VALUES PLEASE SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 3 AND 6.

THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNBEIGHTED (RAU) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUHBER OF DATA CASES.

<TWO DECIMAL PLACES ARE IHPLIED> . . ..-_.......*...................--...-............--...-.

1113 100. UNUEIGHTED CASES 508 133. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES

to49-#080) 417 200. DOUBLE WEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES #040-(048,

#081-1088, AND till-t118)

'1' DR 1 COL 14 .I.

VAR 0005 REP 0005 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-PROVINCE OF INTERVIEW NO HISSING DATA CODES


72 219 324

72 2391 3162

390 282 513 760

PROVINCE .- . . . . . .

0. 1. 2. 3.

2: 6. 7. 0. 9.

PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND NOVA SCOTIA NEY BRUNSWICK NEYFOUNDLAND QUEBEC ONTARIO BANITOBA SASKATCHEWAN ALBERTA BRITISH COLUNBIA


VAR 0006 REF 0006 DATA SET ID-'72251 NASE-R'S CONSTITUENCY NO KISSING DATA CODES

LOC 15 UIDTH 3 DK 1 COL 16-18

RESPONDENT'S CONSTITUENCY CONSTITUENCIES ARE NUHBERED CONSECUTIVELY, BEGINNING KITH 001 (ST. JOHN'S WEST, NEWFOUNDLAND) THROUGH 116 (VICTORIA, BRITISH COLUMBIA). THE CONSTITUENCY IS THE BASIS FOR DETERMINING THE RESPONDENT'S VALUE IN TRE WEIGHT VARIABLES. SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 3 AND 4. *...........*...*._.........*....-.-.....--.--.....-.*....

NEW POUNDLAND

42 001. ST. JOHN'S REST 30 002. ST. JOHN'S EAST

NOVA SCOTIA

30 003. CAPE BRITON NORTH AND VICTORIA 63 004. COLCHESTER-BANTS 30 005. CUMBERLAND 96 006. HALIFAX

PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND

72 007. KINGS

NEW BRUNSWICK

63 000. CHARLOTTE 66 009. NORTHUKBERLAND-MIRANICHI 42 010. RESTIGOUCHE-EADAUASKA 40 011. ROYAL 39 012. SAINT JOHN-ALBERT 66 013. WESTNORLAND

QUEBEC


(CONTINUED) . . . . ..-.--.

51 48 42 01 51 87 48 39 51 57

2 66 60 60 36 54 75 45 69

:; 39 66 69 63 72

114 120 108 120 102 102 114

72

014. BEAUCE 015. BEAUHARNOIS-SALABEERY 016. BELLECBASSE 017. CHANBLY-ROUVILLE 018. CHICOUTXHI 019. DRUBBOND-ARTHABASKA 020. GATINEAU 021. HULL 022. JOLIETTE-L'ASSUHPTION-MONTCALM 023, LEVIS 024. LONGUEUIL 025. BATAPEDIA-HATANE 026. HEGANTIC 027. PORTNEUP 028. QUEBEC-OUEST 029. QUEBEC-SUD 030. QUEBEC-MONTUORENCY 031. RICHNOND-WOLF 032. RIUOUSKI 033. SAINT HYACINTHE-BAGOT 034. SAINT JEAN-IBERVILLE-NAPIERVILLE 035. SAINT-KAURICE-LAPLECHE 036. SHEFFORD 037. SHERBROOKE 038. TERREBONNE 039. TROIS-RIVIERES 040. CARTIER 041. JACQUES-CARTIER-LASALLE 042. LAVAL 043. BERCIER 044. WONT-ROYAL 045. NOTRE-DAHE-DE-GRACE 046. OUTREBONT-SAINT-JEAN 047. SAINT-DENIS 048. SAINT-JACQUES

ONTARIO

52 049. ALGOHA WEST 60 050. BRANTFOED 92 051. BRANT-HALDIBAND 72 052. BRUCE 00 053. CARLETON 76 054. DURHAB 40 055. ESSEX EAST

116 056. ESSEX SOUTH 44 057. ESSEX VEST 48 058. HANILTON SOUTH


Y”b 72 80 76 56 60 84 88 72 76 76 88 68

104 80 76 60 88 84 8d 4.3

108 96

228 150

24 90 72 42

059. HAHILTON WEST 060. HASTINGS-FRONTENAC 061. LANBTON-KENT 062. LONDON 063. RIDDLESEX EAST 064. NIAGARA FALLS 065. NICKEL BELT 066. NORFOLK 067. ONTARIO 068. PEEL 069. PERTH 070. PETERBOROUGH 071. PORT ARTHUR 072. PRINCE EDWARD LENNOX 073. RENFREY SOUTH 074. RUSSELL 075. STOREONT 076. SUDBURY 077. WELLAND 078. WELLINGTON-HURON 079. WELLINGTON-SOUTH 080. WENTUORTH 081. YORK CENTRE 002. YORK HUlBER 083. YORK SCARBOROUGH 084. YORK VEST 085. BROADVIEY 086, EGLINTON 087. PARKDALE 088. ROSEDALE

MANITOBA

54 33 57 57 42

z': 42

089. BRANDON-SOURIS 090. PORTAGE-NEEPAWA 091. ST, BONIFACE 092. SPRINGFIELD 093. YINNIPEG RORTH 094. WINNIPEG YORTH CENTRE 095. WINNIPEG SOUTH 096. WINNIPEG SOUTH CENTRE

SASKATCHEYAN

66 097. HOOSE HOUNTAIN 54 098. QU'APPELLE

(CONTINUED) .-.I......*


(CONTINUED) . . . ..s.....

48 099. EEGINA CITY 6 100. ROSETOWN-BIGGAR

42 101. ROSTHERN 66 102. SASKATOON

ALBERTA

69 103. BOW RIVER 63 104. CALGARY NORTH 66 105. CALGARY SOUTH 5u 106. EDMONTON EAST

117 107. EDflONTON-STRATHCONA 39 108. EDMONTON-UEST 42 109. MEDICINE HAT 63 110. RED DEER

BRITISH COLUHBIA

108 111. BURNABY COQUITLAM 120 112. COAST-CAPILANO 102 113. FRASER VALLEY

90 114. NEU WESTNINSTER 60 115. VANCOUVER CENTRE 78 116. VANCOUVER EAST

11u 117. VANCOUVER QUADRA 96 1 la- VICTORIA

VAR 0007 REF 0007 1IAME-SIZE OF PLACE MD=GE 99

LOC 18 YIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 19-20

DATA SET ID-'7225'

SIZE OF PLACE

(SUBURBS UERE DEFINED AS PLACES PHYSICALLY COTERRINOUS YITH CITIES OR SO CLOSE AS TO BE PART OF ONE URBAN AREA.) _.._...........-.__-..-..............-...*.....-.

1110 01. CITY 500,000 AND OVER 635 02. SUBURB OF CITY 500,000 AND OVER 866 11. CITY 250,000-499,999 378 12. SUBURB OF CITY 250,000-499,999 540 21. CITY 100,000-249.999


(CONTINUED) - . . . . . . I I . .

110 598 961 764

1196 995

22. SUBURB OF CITY lOO,OOO-249,999 31. CITY SO,OOO-99,999 UO. TOWN lO,OOO-49,999 50. TOWN 2500-9,999 60. VILLAGE UNDER 2500 70. RURAL ROUTE ADDRESS; HENTION OF COONTY

ONLY: NO STREET ADDRESS AND FARiY OCCUPATION.

40 99. N.A.

VAR 0008 REP 0008 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-ClOST IMP PBES FOR CANADA BD=GE 90 HULT BESPS 2

LOC 20 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 21-24

Q. 1. YOU HEAR A LOT ABOUT THE PROBLEES FACING THE COUNTRY TODAY AND ME ARE INTERESTED IN GETTING OPINIONS ON THESE FROE YOU. IN YOOR OPINION YBAT PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY ARE MOST IHPORTANT? . . . . ..-.........._....*-.-..........................---....

ECONOKIC PROBLEHS

1898

623

302

1506 254

11. TALXES, INFLATION, PRICES, HIGH COST OF LIVING, LOU SALARIES, POVERTY

12. CORKERCE, TRADE, ECONOEIC AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPHENT, NATURAL RESOURCES, FINANCE, PUBLIC DEBT, BONETARY POLICY.

13. OTHERS (GENERAL RUBRICS SUCH AS TEE ECONOKY, ECONOBIC SITUATION)

14. UNEMPLOYMENT AND AUTOHATION. 15. AGRICULTURAL PROBLEM.

SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAHS

874 74

603 194 889

16. OLD AGE PENSION AND PENSION PLAN 17. FAKILY ALLOWANCES 18. HEALTH, YELPARE AND BEDICARE.

2: OTHERS (OR GENERALLY) EDUCATIONAL PROBLEHS (INCLUDES TECHNICAL TRAINIEG)

RELIGIOUS AND KORAL PROBLEHS

56 21. RELIGIOUS 80 22. KORAL (CHANGING VALUES, ETC.)


VAR 0009 REP 0009 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAilE-PBN SPECIAL CONCERN TO R BD=GE 90 HULT RESPS 2

LOC 24 WIDTH 2 DR 1 COL 25-28

299

35 751 122

959 289

70 261 382

67 19 64 58

516

203 64

136 203

431

123 3198

775

(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .

FOREIGN RELATIONS

23. U.S.A. RELATIONS (INCLUDES SPECIFIC PROBLEB OF U.S. ECONOtiIC INFLUENCE)

24. COf4HUNISN. 25. WAR, DEPENCE, NUCLEAR THREAT, VIET NAN 26. OTHERS (SUCH AS FOREIGN AID, ETC.)

POLITICAL PROBLEHS

f 2 ETHNIC RELATIONS, BILINGUAL & BICULTURAL SEPARATISB NATIONAL UNITY AND IDENTITY.

29. FEDERAL PROVINCIAL RELATIONS. 30. HAJORITY GOVERNBENT. 31. LACK OF STABILITY AND/OR LEADERSHIP IN

GOVERNRENT. 32. PARTY STRUCTURE OR SYSTEM. 33. PUBLIC ADNINISTRATION (UASTE OR TAXES, ETC.)

2 CORRUPTION AND SCANDAL. SOCIALXSB.

36. OTHERS (OR GENERALLY).

SOCIAL PROBLEMS

37. IBHIGEATION, INDIANS, RACE RELATIONS (B AND W) 38. CAPITAL PUNISHNENT. 39. LABOUR-BANAGEBENT PROBLEHS, STRIKES. 40. OTHERS.

81. ALL OTHER PROBLEHS.

90. IRRELEVANT, NO SPECIAL PROBLEN. 92. INAP. (NO SECOND RESPONSE) 99. NO ANSWER, DON'T RNOY.

Q. 2-A. (IF PEOBLEB EENTIONED IN REF. NO. 8) WHICH ONE OF THESE <NATIONAL> PROBLEClS IS OF SPECIAL CONCERN TO YOU PERSONALLY?


1852

311

143

779 181

566 16. OLD AGE PENSION AND PENSIGN PLAN. 33 17. FAMILY ALLOYANCES

340 18. HEALTH, WELFARE AND IEDICARE. 116 19. OTHERS (OR GENERALLY) 615 20. EDUCATIONAL PROBLEflS (INCLUDES TECHNICAL TRAINING)

50 21. RELIGIOUS. 46 22. flORAL (CHANGING VALUES, ETC.)

174

2:: 39

463 171

33 121 215

23 2s 45 51

250

(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . I . . .

ECONOMIC PROBLEflS

11. TAXES, INFLATION, PRICES, HIGH COST OF LIVING, LOW SALARIES, POVERTY.

12. COMMERCE. TRADE, ECONONIC AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPBENT, NATURAL RESOURCES, FINANCE, PUBLIC DEBT, PIONETAEY POLICY.

13. OTHERS (GENERAL RUBRICS SUCH AS THE ECONOHY, ECONOUIC SITUATION)

14. UNEKPLOYRENT AND AUTOflATION. 15. AGRICULTURAL PROBLEBS.

SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAPIS

RELIGIOUS AND MORAL PROBLEHS

FOREIGN RELATIONS

23. U.S.A. RELATIONS (INCLUDES SPECIFIC PROBLEH OF U.S. ECONOBIC INFLUENCE)

24. COBHUNISH 25. WAR, DEFENCE, NUCLEAR THREAT, VIET NAR. 26. OTHERS (SUCH AS FOREIGN AID, ETC.)

POLITICAL PROBLECLS

27. ETHNIC RELATIONS, BILINGUAL C BICULTURAL SEPARATXSl'¶ 28. NATIONAL UNITY AND IDENTITY. 29. FEDERAL PROVINCIAL RELATIONS. 30. SAJORITY GOVERNHENT. 31. LACK OF STABILITY AND/OR LEADERSHIP IN GOVERNRENT. 32. PARTY STRUCTURE OR SYSTEM. 33. PUBLIC ADtlINISTRATION (UASTE OF TAXES, ETC.) 34. CORRUPTION AND SCANDAL. 35. SOCIALISM. 36. OTHERS (OR GENERALLY).


(CONTINUED) ..-.-......

SOCIAL PROBLEHS

84 37. INNIGRATION, INDIANS, RACE RELATIONS (B AND iv'). 40 38. CAPITAL PUNISHf',ENT. 65 39. LABOUR-HANAGEHENT PROBLEHS, STRIKES.

168 40. OTHERS.

237 Bl. ALL OTHER PROBLENS.

45 90. IRRELEVANT, NO SPECIAL PROBLEB. 68 91. INAP.; CODED 90 IN FIRST RESP. REP. NO. 8.

7062 92. NO SECOND NENTION 1680 99. NO ANSYER, DON'T KNOW

VAR 0010 REF 0010 NAPIE-R'S FLGS ABT ELCTN RSLTS HD=O

LOC 28 uIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 29

DATA SET ID-'72251

3373

367 1522

347 214 424

96

293 769

Q. 3-A. AS YOU KNOW ON NOVEMBER THE ~TH YE HAD A FEDERAL ELECTION. PEOPLE ARE TALKING A LOT ABOUT THIS ELECTION AND HOW IT TURNED OUT. DO YOU HAPPEN TO HAVE ANY FEELINGS ABOUT HOW THE ELECTION TURNED OUT? . . . . . . . ..I. - . . . . . . . .._1-...........-..-.*.........-......

1. DISPLEASED BECAUSE ELECTION USELESS OR UNWARRANTED (ANSWERS SUCH AS "YE SHOULDN'T HAVE HAD IT," IT'S A UASTE OF MONEY v OR "IT CHANGES NOTHING"); OR DISPLEASED BECAUSE NO MAJORITY OBTAINED

2. DISPLEASED BECAUSE HIS PARTY LOST. 3. DISPLEASED (NO SPECIFIC REASON GIVEN OR REASON

OTHER THAN ABOVE)

NEUTRAL FEELINGS.

4. A. EXPECTED THE RESULTS. 5. B. INDIFFERENCE (DOESN'T CARE HOU IT CAME OUT) 6. C. FEELINGS UNKNOHN (IRRELEVANT ANSWERS THAT

DON'T INDICATE RESPONDENT'S FEELINGS) 7. D. OTHERS (ANSWERS THAT DON'T GIVE THE RESPONDENT'S

FEELINGS BUT THAT ARE NOT IRRELEVANT.)

PLEASED BECAUSE TRIS PARTY UON. PLEASED (NO SPECIFIC REASON GIVEN OR REASON OTAEE THAN ABOVE)


(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . ..-

780 0. DON'T

NOTE: 1. ABBIGUITY

KNOW, NO OPINION, REFUSE, ETC.

IN THE QUESTION CAUSED ROST RESPONDENTS FEELINGS ABOUT THE "FEDERAL ELECTION," TO GIVE THEIR

E.G. "WE SHOULDN'T HAVE HAD IT" AND ONLY A HINORITY GAVE THEIR FEELINGS ABOUT THE RESULTS OF THE FEDERAL ELECTION.

VAR 0011 REP 0011 DATA SET ID-'7225' NANE-XF'S REASON PR OPINION ND=0

LOC 29 UXDTH 1 DR 1 COL 30

Q. 3-B. CAN YOU TELL BE SOHETHING BORE ABOUT WRY YOU FEEL THAT UAY <ABOUT THE ELECTION RESULTS>? (THE ANSWERS TO 3-A AND 3-B HAVE BEEN COHBINED IN REP- NO. 10 UNLESS THE RESPONDENT GAVE A DISTINCT ANSWER TO 3-B.) . . . ..-._........._...-.-...........-.....-.........-..--

319 1.

36 2. 197 3.

DISPLEASED BECAUSE ELECTION USELESS OR ONUARRANTED (ANSWERS SUCB AS "WE SHOULDN'T HAVE HAD IT," "IT'S A WASTE OF MONEY" OR "IT CHANGES NOTHING”): OR DISPLEASED BECAUSE NO HAJORITY OBTAINED. DISPLEASED BECAUSE HIS PARTY LOST. DISPLEASED (NO SPECIFIC REASON GIVEN OR REASON OTHER THAN ABOVE).

NEUTRAL FEELINGS.

14 4. 7 5.

34 6.

21 7.

A. EXPECTED TRE RESULTS. 8. INDIFFERENCE (DOESN'T CARE HOY IT CAHE OUT). C. FEELINGS UNKNOWN (IRRELEVANT ANSYERS THAT DON'T

INDICATE RESPOBDENT'S FEELINGS) D. OTHERS (ANSWERS THAT DON'T GIVE TAE RESPONDENT'S

FEELINGS BUT THAT ARE NOT IRRELEVANT)

47 75

a. 9.

0.

PLEASED BECAUSE HIS PARTY YON PLEASED (NO SPECIFIC REASON GIVEU OR REASON OTHER THAN ABOVE).

6843 DON'T KNOU, NO OPINION, REFDSE, NO CODABLE OPINION.


VAR 0012 REF 0012 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAME-WCH GOVT HANDLES PBMS HD=GE 8

LOC 30 UIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 31

Q. 4-A. THINKING NOW OF THE MOST IHPOETANT PROBLEHS FACING CANADA TODAY, WHICH GOVERNMENT WOULD YOU SAY HANDLES IIOST OF THESE, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN OTTAWA OR THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS? ._._...............................-...-....-........-....--

3901 1. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 1449 2. PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS 1934 3. BOTH HANDLE THEM

209 4. NEITHER

691 8. DK 9 9. N-A..

VAR 0013 REP 0013 NAME-ANY PVNL GOVT HORE PURFL MD=GE 8

LOC 31 WIDTH 1 DK 1 CDL 32

DATA SET ID-'72251

Q. 4-B. ARE ANY PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS MORE POWERFUL THAN OTHERS? ..1..__.1.._.._....-..-..............-.--.....-....-......

4785 1. YES 1629 2. NO

1779 8, DK, IF ANY ARE MORE POWERFUL

VAR 0014 REP 0014 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XNEWPOUNDLAND POYEBFUL? MD=0 OR GE 0


NEWFOUNDLAND BORE POUERFUL? <SEE REF. NO. 13> ..-...s.- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -...a1-em-1-1

154 R MENTIONS NEWFOUNDLAND AS MORE POWERFUL 4561 :: R DOES NOT hENTION NEWFOUNDLAND

66 8. YES, SONE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS MORE POWERFUL, BUT DK UHICH PROVINCES ARE MORE POWERFUL

4 9. REF. NOS. 14-23 N.A.


(CONTINUED) I- .I.......

3408 0. INAP.: CODED 2 OR 8 IN REP. NO. 13

VAR 0015 REF 0015 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XPRINCE ED ILND POWERFL? ED=0 OR GE 8


PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND HORE POWERFUL? <SEE REF. NO. 13> . . ..*...........*_...-...-.......--..*-.........---...

9 1. R BENTIONS PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND AS BORE POUERPUL 11706 5. R DOES NOT MENTION PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND

66

4 3408

8. YES, SOBE PROVINCIAL GOVERNNENTS EORE PORERPUL, BUT DK RHXCB PROVINCES ARE HORE POWERFUL

9. REF. NOS. 14-23 N-A. 0. INAP.; CODED 2 OB 8 IN REF. NO. 13

VAR 0016 REP 0016 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-XNOVA SCOTIA POWERFUL? MD=0 OR GE 8


NOVA SCOTIA HORE POWERFUL? <SEE REF. NO. 13> ..I.. s . . . . ..I.... -- . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . .

78 1. R BENTIONS NOVA SCOTIA AS BORE POYERFUL 4637 5. R DOES NOT BENTION NOVA SCOTIA

66 8. YES, SOME PROVINCIAL GOVERNHENTS BORE POUERPUL, BUT DK UHICH PROVINCES ARE BORE POWERFUL

4 9. REF. NOS. 14-23 N.A. 3408 0. INAP.; CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 13

VAR 0017 REP 0017 DATA SET ID-'72251 NABE-XNEW BRUNSUICK POWERFUL? LID=0 OR GE 8


67 1, R I'IENTIONS NEY BRUNSUICK AS BORE POBERFUL 4648 5. B DOES NOT MENTION NEW BRUNSWICK

NEW BRUNSWICK BORE POWERFUL? <SEE REP. NO. 13> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..--.........--....


66

4 3408

(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .

8. YES, sonE PROVINCIAL GOVERNnENTS KIORE POYERPUL, BUT DK WHICH PROVINCES ARE NORE POWERFUL

9. REF. NOS. 14-23 N.A. 0. INAP.: CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 13

VAR 0018 REF 0018 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-XQUEBEC POWERFUL? tlD=O OR GE 8


QUEBEC MORE POWERFUL? <SEE REF. NO. 13> . . . . . . ..I. *.1.11.-m . . ..I a . . ..I..........

2911 1. R MENTIONS QUEBEC AS ROBE PO'iJERFUL 1804 5. R DOES NOT HENTION QUEBEC

66 8. YES, SORE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS BORE POWERFUL, BUT DK WHICH PROVINCES ARE RORE POWERFUL

4 9. REF. NOS. 14-23 N-A. 3408 0. INAP.: CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 13

VAR 0019 REF 0019 DATA SET ID-172251 NAME-XONTARIO POWERFUL? ND=0 OR GE 8


ONTARIO MORE POYERPUL? <SEE REP. NO. 13> . . . . . . . . . -1e.e 1.1. em...- . . . . . I . . . . ..I s.s..

2679 R KlENTIONS ONTARIO AS HORE POWERFUL 2036 :: R DOES NOT HENTION ONTARIO

66 8. YES, SOBE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS l+ORE POWERFUL, BUT DK YHICW PROVINCES ARE BORE POWERFUL


VAR 0020 REF 0020 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XMANITOBA POWERFUL? HD=O OR GE 8


I'lANITOBA MORE POWERFUL? <SEE REF. NO. 13> . . . . . . . ..__...........--*.................


[CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .

149 1. R MENTIONS ilANITOBA AS HORE POWERFUL 4566 5. R DOES NOT MENTION flANITOBA

66 8. YES, SONE PROVINCIAL GOVERNNENTS NORE POUERFUL, BUT DK WHICH PROVINCES ARE MORE POWERFUL

4 9. REF. NOS. 14-23 N-A. 3408 0. INAP.: CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 13

VAR 0021 REP 0021 DATA SET ID-172251 NAME-XSASKATCHEWAN POWERFUL? HD=O OR GE 8


257 1. R MENTIONS SASKATCHEWAN AS NORE POWERFUL 4458 5. R DOES NOT NENTION SASKATCHEWAN

66

4 3408

8. YES, SOBE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS BORE POUERFUL, BUT DK WHICH PROVINCES ARE BORE POYERFUL

9. REF. NOS. 14-23 N.A. 0. INAP.: CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 13

SASKATCHEWAN flORE POWERFUL? <SEE REF. NO. 13> .I............................................

VAR 0022 REF 0022 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XALBERTA POWERFUL? HD-0 OR GE 8


ALBERTA BORE POUERFUL? <SEE REF. NO. 13> -........................................

606 1. R MENTIONS ALBERTA AS BORE POYERFUL 4109 5. R DOES NOT BENTION ALBERTA

66 8. YES, SONE PROVINCIAL GOVERNNENTS BORE POUERFUL, BUT DK YHICH PROVINCES ARE UORE POYERPUL



VAR 0023 REP 0023 DATA SET X0-*7225' NARE-XBRITISH COLMBIA POWERFL CID=0 OR GE 8


BRITISH COLURBIA BORE POWERFUL? <SEE REP. NO. 13> . . . . . . . . . .._..........-....-..-.-........-......--

1246 1. R HENTIONS BRITISH COLUBBIA AS BORE POWERFUL 3469 5. R DOES NOT BENTION BRITISH COLUHBIA

66 8. YES, SOBE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS BORE POYERPUL, BUT DK WHICH PROVINCES ARE BORE POWERFUL

4 9. REF. NOS. 14-23 N.A. 3408 0. INAP.: CODED 2 OR 8 IN REP. NO. 13

VAR 0024 REF 0024 NANE-LVL GOVT MOST IflP TO R HD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 5. AS PAR AS YOU ARE CONCERNED PERSONALLY, YHICH GOVERNNENT IS HORE IMPORTANT IN AFFECTING HOY YOU AND YOUR FAMILY GET ON? THE ONE IN OTTAWA OR THE ONE IN THIS PROVINCE? _.-.-.........__..__.............-.--.-.--........-.......

2439 1. FEDERAL GOVERNHENT 3342 2. PROVINCIAL GOVERNBENT 1683 3, BOTR IHPORTANT

360 4. NEITHER

353 8. OK 16 9. NA

VAR 0025 REP 0025 DATA SET IO-'7225' NAKE-IBP ISSUES IN ELECTION ID=GE 90 KULT RESPS 2


Q. 6. DURING TRIS ELECTION PEOPLE HAD DIFFERENT OPINIOI!S ABOUT THE ISSUES YiiICH WERE IHPORTANT IN THE CAHPAIGN. YE ARE INTERESTED IN HEARING XOUR OPIWION ABOUT YHAT YOU THOUGHT HERE THE HOST IRPORTANT ISSUES IN THE LAST ELECTION. ..-...-.......-..-...............-..-.-..............-.-.


(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .

SOCIAL SECURITY ISSUES

2664 11. OLD AGE PENSION AND PENSION PLAN. 175 12. FAMILY ALLOWANCE.

1267 13. HEALTH AND WELFARE AND MEDICARE. 199 14. OTHERS (OR GENERALLY). 391 15. CORRUPTION AND SCANDAL IN GOVERNBENT. 149 16. AGRICULTURAL ISSUES.

403

226 128

ECONOHIC ISSUES

289 20.

175 21.

80 22.

438 23. 892 24. 235 25.

62 26. 27 27.

540 28.

TAXES, INFLATION, PRICES, SALARIES, COST OF LIVING, POVERTY. COBHERCE, TRADE, ECONOHIC AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, ETC. OTHERS AND GENERAL RUBRICS SUCH AS, "THE ECONOHY" AND "THE ECONOBIC SITUATION" UNEBPLOYMENT AND AUTOHATION. HAJORITY GOVERNHENT. EDUCATIONAL ISSUES. LACK OF LEADERSHIP IN GOVERNHENT. LACK OF STABILITY IN GOVERNHENT. OTHERS.

487 90. IRRELEVANT OR REFUSES, ETC- 5195 92. NO SECOND RESPONSE 2364 99. NO ANSWER OR "NO IHPORTANT ISSUES"

NATIONAL UNITY AND IDENTITY ISSUES

17. ETHNIC RELATIONS, SEPARATISM, QUEBEC, BILINGUALISM AND BICULTURALISH.

18. FLAG. 19. U.S.A. INFLUENCE OR INTERFERENCE,

FEDERAL-PROVINCIAL RELATIONS, CANADIAN NATIONALISH.

VAR 0026 REP 0026 DATA SET ID-'7225' NANE-SCL ULPR ISQS-IHPC ELCN BD=GE 8

LOC 47 YIOTH 1 OK 1 COL 48

NOW I AH GOING TO READ YOU SOBE OF TRE ISSUES WHICH UERE DISCUSSED IN THE LAST ELECTION CABPAIGN AND I UOULD LIKE YOU TO TELL HE, FOR EACH ISSUE BOW IHPORTANT IT HAS TO YOU PERSONALLY IN AELPING YOU DECIDE HOW TO VOTE.


(CONTINUED) .*..I...-.*

3211 2023 2740

182 37

VAR 0027 REP 0027 DATA SET ID-'72251

Q. 7-A. TAKE SOCIAL WELFARE ISSUES, LIKE HEALTH INSURANCE AND PENSIONS, HOX INPORTANT WAS THAT TO YOU IN DECIDING HOU TO VOTE? VERY IBPORTANT, FAIRLY IHPORTANT, OR NOT TOO IHPORTANT? .*.._..........**_.....-........-....-....-...........-..-.

1: VERY IBPORTANT FAIRLY INPORTANT

3. NOT TOO IKPOATANT

8. DK 9. NA

NAME-ECONOMIC ISUS-IEPC ELCN BD=GE 8 LOC 48 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 49

4120 2118 1625

299 31

VAR 0028 REP 0028

2513 1. VERY INPORTANT 1750 2. FAIRLY IBPORTANT 3662 3. NOT TOO IMPORTANT

Q. 7-B. HOW ABOUT ISSUES CONCERNING THE ECONOBY, SUCK AS UNEHPLOYRENT, GOVERNXENT PLANNING FOR TBE FUTURE, FOREIGN TRADE <HOW IXPORTANT HAS THAT TO YOU IN DECIDING HOW TO VOTE>? . . . ..-....-........_........*.....-...*.-.....-...**-....

1. VERY IHPORTANT 2. FAIRLY IBPORTANT 3. NOT TOO IBPORTANT

8. DK 9. NA

DATA SET ID-'7225 NAKE-ENGLH-FN ISUS-IIPC ELCN no=GE 8


Q. 7-C. NOW THINK OF THE ISSUE OF RELATIONS BETUEEN PEENCF AND ENGLISH-SPEAKING CANADIANS. WAS THIS VERY IBPORTANT, FAIRLY IMPORTANT, OR NOT TOO IMPORTANT TO YOU <IN DECIDING HOW TO VOTE>? . . . . . . . . . ..~.........~........~.......-~.........-.*...-.-


(CONTINUED) .--1-e . . . . .

208 8. DK 60 9. NA

VAB 0029 REP 0029 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-FLAG ISSUE-IbPORTNC ELCN fiD=GE 0


Q. 7-D. IN DECIDING HOW TO VOTE, DID YOU PEEL THAT THE CANADIAN FLAG ISSUE WAS VERY IHPORTANT, PAIRLY IHPORTANT OR NOT TOO IMPORTANT? . . . . . . . . ..*1.......*....*...............................--.

1672 1. VERY IMPORTANT 1288 2. FAIRLY IHPOETANT 5028 3. NOT TOO IBPOBTANT

153 8. DK 52 9. NA

VAR 0030 REP 0030 NAME-CANADIAN UNITY-IHPC ELCN HD=GE 8

DATA SET ID-'7225'

LOC 51 YIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 52

4131 1958 1707

343 54

VAR 0031 REP 0031 NAME-GOVT CORRUPTN-IHPC ELCN BD=GE 8


Q. 7-E. WHAT ABOUT THE UNITY OF CANADA? UAS THIS AN ISSUE WHICH YOU POUND VERY IMPORTANT. FAIRLY IBPORTANT, OR NOT TOO IRPORTANT <IN DECIDING HOI TO VOTE>? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-................................-........

I, VERY IMPORTANT 2. PAIRLY IRPORTANT 3. NOT TOO IHPORTANT

8. DK 9. NA

DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q- 7-F. YAS CORRUPTION IN GOVERNHENT AN ISSUE YHICA YOU


3100 1660 2378

410 45

PAR 0032 REF 0032 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-NAJORITY GOVT ISSUE-XNPC ID=GE 8


(CONTINUED) . . ..I......

POUND VERY IRPORTANT, FAIRLY IHPORTANT, OR NOT TOO IHPORTANT <IN DECIDING HOW TO VOTE>? . . . . . . . ..~.....--......................-...-....--

1. VERY IHPORTANT 2. FAIRLY IMPORTANT 3. NOT TOO IMPORTANT

8. DK 9. NA

Q. 7-G. HOW IMPORTANT <IN DECIDING HOW TO VOTE> DID YOU PIND THE ISSUE OF WHETHER CANADA SHOULD HAVE A RAJORITY GOVERNRENT? . ..--...~....-...-.......................-*......-.-~...

4637 1. VERY INPORTANT 1513 2. FAIRLY IRPORTANT 1641 3. NOT TOO INPORTANT

311 8. DK 91 9. NA

VAR 0033 REP 0033 NAME-STRONG LDR ISU-IRPC ELCN ID=GE 8

DATA SET ID-'7225


Q. 7-8. DID TRE ISSUE OF STRONG LEADERSHIP IN OTTARA STRIK YOU AS BEING VERY IUPORTANT, FAIRLY IHPORTANT OR NOT TOO IMPORTANT <IN.DECIDING HOW TO VOTE>? -........*.....-.............*-....-......*...-...-...-....

5162 1639 1066

1. VERY IHPORTANT

:: PAIRLY IHPORTANT NOT TOO IMPORTANT

282 8. DK 44 9. NA


VAR 0034 REF 0034 DATA SET ID-172251 NANE-GOVT PORMN-IHPC HJRY PTY ilD=GE 8


Q- 8. NOW I HAVE A DIFFERENT KIND OP QUESTION. IN RECENT ELECTIONS, THE POLITICAL PARTY WHICH HAS PORHED THE GOVERNNENT IN OTTAWA HAS NOT HAD A NAJORITY OF THE SEATS IN PARLIANENT. DO YOU THINK IT BAKES A GREAT DEAL OF DIFFERENCE, SOHE DIPFERENCE, OR NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE RHETHER THE PARTY FORMING THE GOVERNBENT HAS A MAJORITY OF SEATS OR NOT? . . . . ..*............-...-.--......-..--.--...-..-.-..........

4976 1. GREAT DEAL OF DIFFERENCE 1771

f : SOME DIFFERENCE

1206 NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE

233 8. DK 7 9. NA

VAR 0035 REF 0035 NAME-VT OTR PTY IF BJRY GOVT ID=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q- 9. IF YOU BELIEVED THAT A PARTY COULD FORH A HAJORITY GOVERNNENT, BUT YOU DID NOT ORDINARILY VOTE FOR THAT PARTY, HOW LIKELY WOULD YOU BE TO VOTE FOR IT IN ORDER TO HAVE A MAJORITY GOVERNMENT? VERY LIKELY, SOBEYEAT LIKELY, OR NOT AT ALL LIKELY? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-................-.---.-.....-..........

1913 1. VERY LIKELY 2010 2. SOMEWHAT LIKELY 3516 3. NOT AT ALL LIKELY

734 8. DK 20 9. NA

VAR 0036 REP 0036 DATA SET ID-'7225' NANE-DEGREE INTST IN POLITICS HD=GE 8


Q. 10. HOW RUCH INTEREST DO YOU GENERALLY HAVE IN WHAT IS GOING ON IN POLITICS-A GOOD DEAL, SOME, OR NOT NUCH? -.................1......-....-.......--.-................


(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . I I . .

2145 1. A GOOD DEAL 3550 SOflE 2U69

:: NOT flUCH

23 8. DK 6 9. NA

VAR 0037 REF 0037 NAHE-CROOKED PEOPLE IN GOVT HD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 11. NOW I'D LIKE TO TALK ABOUT SOHE OF THE DIFFERENT IDEAS PEOPLE HAVE ABOUT THE GOVERNflENT IN OTTAWA AND SEE HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT THEM. THESE OPINIONS DON'T REFER TO ANY POLITICAL-PARTY IN PARTICULAR, BUT JUST TO THE GOVERNHENT IN GENERAL. FOR EXAPIPLE:

A. DO YOU THINK THAT QUITE A FEW OF THE PEOPLE RUNNING THE GOVERNNENT ARE A LITTLE CROOKED, NOT VERY HANY ARE CROOKED, OR DO YOU THINK HARDLY ANY OF THEN ARE CROOKED? . ..I*._.........*............--..... . . . . . ..-.I...-..-.-.-..

1970 1. QUITE A PEW 3160 2. NOT VERY MANY 2263 3. HARDLY ANY

780 8. DK 20 9. NA

VAR 0038 REF 0038 NAME-TAX MONEY UASTED BY GOVT HD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 11-B. DO YOU THINK THAT PEOPLE IN THE GOVERNflENT WASTE LOT OF THE I'lONEY WE PAY IN TAXES, WASTE SOME OF IT, OR DON' WASTE VERY tiUCH OF IT? ..**_.._...........*......-......-.*............-....-.-...

2921 1. A LOT 3735 2. son8 1062 3. NOT HUCH

465 8. DK


(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .

10 9. NA

VAR 0039 REP 0039 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-TST GOVT TO DO RGT THING MD=GE 8


Q. 11-C. HOW NUCH OF THE TIBE DO YOU THINK YOU CAN TRUST THE GOVERNMENT IN OTTAUA TO DO YHAT IS RIGHT-JUST ABOUT ALWAYS, ROST OF THE TIME, OR ONLY SOME OF THE TIflE? . . . . ..*............*................-....-..-............

764 1. ALWAYS 3973 2. flOST OF THE TIflE 2980 3. SOME OF THE TINE

459 8. DK 17 9. NA

VAR 0040 REF 0040 NAME-GOVT TREAT PEOPLE EQUAL BD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 11-D. DO YOU THINK THAT ALL PEOPLE WHO ARE HIGH IN GOVERNflENT GIVE EVERYONE A FAIR BREAK, YHETHER THEY ARE BIG SHOTS OR JUST ORDINARY PEOPLE, OR DO YOU THINK SOHE OF THEM PAY ROBE ATTENTION TO WHAT THE BIG INTERESTS WANT? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..*..-.-....-....--............-........

1242 1. GIVE EVERYONE A FAIR BREAK 6121 2. PAY ATTENTION TO BIG SHOTS

795 8. DK 35 9. NA

VAR 0041 REP 0041 NAHE-GOVT PPL KNOW WHAT TO DO MD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 11-E. DO YOU FEEL THAT ALHOST ALL OF THE PEOPLE RUNNING THE GOVERNMENT ARE SNART PEOPLE WHO USUALLY KNOW YHAT THEY ARE DOING, OR DO YOU THINK THAT QUITE A FEW OF THEM DON'T


(CONTINUED) ..-...-....

SEEB TO KNOW YHAT THEY ARE DOING? _........._..._....*............-

3221 1. ALL KNOW YHAT THEY ARE DOING 4287 2. QUITE A PEW DON'T KNOW YHAT THEY ARE DOING

653 8. DK 32 9. NA

VAR 0042 REF 0042 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAME-VOTING EPCV POLTL WEAPON ND=GE 0


Q. 12. HERE ARE SOKE OTBER KINDS OF OPINIONS THAT YOU HEAR DIFFERENT PEOPLE GIVING. FOR THESE I'D JUST LIKE YOU TO TELL ME OFFHAND WHETBER YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE.

A. VOTING IS THE ONLY WAY THAT PEOPLE LIKE BE CAN HAVE ANY SAY ABOUT HOU THE GOVEENNENT RUNS TBINGS. DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE? .._...-.._....*......-..-.......-..-*..*.-..*....*..-...--.

6188 1. AGREE 1800 2. DISAGREE

193 8- DK 12 9. NA

VAR 0043 REP 0043 DATA SET ID-'7225 NANE-PUB OFFICIALS DON'T CARE HD=GE a


3732 4009

439 13

Q- 12-a. I DON'T THINK THAT TRE GOVERNRENT CARES NUCH UHA' PEOPLE LIKE BE THINK. . . . . . ..s......... -I....--........_...-..........-.-*..-...

1. AGREE 2. DISAGREE

8. DK 9. NA


VAR 0044 REF 0044 DATA SET ID-17225 NAHE-POLT COMPLCD FOR PEOPLE HD=GE 8


Q. 12-C. SOlETIMES POLITICS AND GOVERNHENT SEEH SO COMPLICATED THAT A PERSON LIKE fiE CAN'T REALLY UNDERSTAND YHAT'S GOING ON.

5631 1. AGREE 2293 2. DISAGEEE

223 8. DK 46 9. NA

VAR 0045 REP 0045 NAME-PPL LK RE NO POLTL PWR flD=GE 8


DATA SET I~-'72251

Q. 12-D. PEOPLE LIKE HE DON'T HAVE ANY SAY ABOUT UHAT THE GOVERNMENT DOES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.....-.-..

4022 :: AGREE 3856 DISAGREE

279 8. DK 36 9. NA

VAR 0046 REF 0046 NAME-flP'S LOSE TOUCH YITH PPL HD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 12-E. GENERALLY THOSE ELECTED TO PARLIASENT SOON LOSE TOUCH UITH THE PEOPLE. . . . . . . . . ..-._............................................

4546 1. AGREE 3034 2. DISAGREE

583 8. DK 30 9. NA

_’ . .


BAR 0047 REP 0047 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-INTLCLS TOO STNG IN GOVT .RD=GE 8

LOC 68 WIDTH 1 DK 1 cOL 69

Q. 12-F. INTELLECTUALS TAKE UP TOO LARGE A POSITION IN OUR GOVERNHENTS. . . .."'~..~~..""'~""""""""""........... ..Iee..m

2924 1. AGREE -_ ' 4164 2. DISAGREE

1105 8. DK 9. NA

VAR 0048 REP 0048 NANE-PSNT FINANCL SATISFACTN MD=GE 8

LOC 69 NIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 70

DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 13, WE ARE ALSO INTERESTED IN HOW PEOPLE ARE GETTING ALONG FINANCIALLY THESE DAYS. AS FAR AS YOU AND YOUR PAUILY ARE CONCERNED, WOULD YOU SAY TBAT YOU ARE PRETTY YELL SATISFIED, .BO,RE OR LESS SATISFIED, OR ,NOT AT ALL SATISFIED ABOUT THE YAPhYOU ARE GETTING ALONG? ..,..........-..........-.......-.-.............-........-..

3342 * 1. PRETTY WELL SATISFIED 3362 2. MORE'OR LESS SATISFIED 1389 3. NOT AT ALL SATISFIED

58 8. DK 42 9. NA

VAR 0049 REF 0049 NAME-CHANGE IN FINANCIAL SIT HD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'72251

Q. 10. DURING THE LAST PEW PEARS, HAS YOUR FINANCIAL SITUATION BEEN GETTING BETTER, BEEN GETTKNG YORSE. ON HAS IT STAYED THE SAME? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...*- -..-...-.......1_._......-.........

3301 1. GETTING BETTER . 1143 t’ 2. GETTING NORSE

3663 3. STAYED THE SALOE


42 44

(CONTINUED) . . . ..I.....

8. DK 9. NA

VAR 0050 REP 0050 NABE-PSNT ENPLT SITUATION BTR ID=GE 7


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q* 15. IN GENERAL, WOULD YOU SAY THAT THE EBPLOYEENT SITUATION OF YOU AND YOUR PAHILY NOY LOOKS HUCA BETTER, SOHEWBAT BETTER, SOREYHAT HORSE OR flUCH UORSE THAN IT DID TUO OR TXREE YEARS AGO? . . . . . . . ..-.........-........-...........-......*-...----.

1534 1. HUCH BETTER 2081 2, SOBEUHAT BETTER 3005 3. ABOUT THE SABE

U81 SOBEYHAT WORSE 251 2: MUCH UORSE

750 7. NOT APPLICABLE 59 8. DK 32 9, NA

VAR 0051 REF 0051 NABE-FUTURE FINANCL SIT BTR? ID=GE B


DATA SET ID-'7225'

3200 3325

872

1. STAY ABOUT TAE SANE

:: GET BETTER GET WORSE

753 8. DK 43 9. NA

Q. 16. NOU LOOKING AHEAD, AND THINKING ABOUT THE NEXT PEU YEARS, DO YOU EXPECT YOUR FINANCIAL SITUATION UILL STAY ABOUT TRE UAY IT IS NOW, GET BETTER, OR GET WORSE? .--..--....-...-...1.-.----....---.--.-...-.........---..-

1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY

VAR 0052 REP 0052 NAME-ELCTN RSLT AFCT PIN SIT MD=GE B


PAGE 28

DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 17-A. DO YOU THINK THAT THE NAY THE ELECTION TURNED OUT WILL HAKE ANY DIFFERENCE IN HOY UELL OFF YOU ARE? _...................-.-.--.....*.....-....-................

1497 1. YES 5877 2. NO

799 t: DK 20 NA

VAR 0053 REP 0053 NAME-XELCTN HK FIN SIT BTR/US MD=0 OR GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 17-B. (IF "YES") : NILL IT <THE WAY THE ELECTION TURNED OUT> MAKE THINGS BETTER OR YORSE? .._--.............._-.-.-.-....-.--..........-.-.---.-.....

825 1. BETTER 431 2. HORSE

233 8. DK 8 9. NA

6696 0. INAP.: CODED 2, 8 OR 9 IN REF. NO. 52.

VAR 0054 REF 0054 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAUE-R UNEHPLOYED IN LAST YR? UD=GE 8


Q. 18. HAVE YOU BEEN PERSONALLY UNERPLOPED AND LOOKING FOR WORK DURING THE PAST YEAR?

645 1. YES 7491 2. NO

18 8. DK 39 9. NA


VAR 0055 REP 0055 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAUE-PAHILY tf0R UEKPLD LST YR l'ID=GE 8

LOC 76 YIDTB 1 DK 1 COL 77

Q. 19. HAS ANYONE IN YOUR FAMILY BEEN UNEBPLOYED AND LOOKING FOR UORK DURING THE PAST YEAR? . . . . . . . . . . . . ..__.-._..-....-...........---...........

1058 1. YES 7080 2. NO

47 8. DK 8 9. NA

VAR 0056 REP 0056 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-PA!! BBR UERPLD LST 3 YR HD=GE 8


1708 6406

Q. 20. WHAT ABOUT THE LAST THREE YEARS? DURING THAT TIME HAVE YOU OR ANY HEHBER OF YOUR PABILY BEEN UNEBPLOYED AND LOOKING FOR WORK? -.._..._......-.......-......-.................--. - I . I . . . .

1. YES 2. NO

58 8. DK 21 9. NA

VAR 0001 REP 0001 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-ICPR STUDY NURBER-7225 NO MISSING DATA CODES

LOC 1 YIDTH 4 DK 2COL 1-4

STUDY NUMBER (7225) .-mm . . . . . . ..I......

VAR 0002 REP 0002 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-INTERVIEY NUiiBER NO BISSING DATA CODES

LOC 5 WIDTH 5 DK 2 COL 5- 9

RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUHBER

1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDX PAGE 30

(CONTINUED) . ..-.-em...

THE FIRST DIGIT IDENTIFIES THE PROVINCE AS CODED IN VARIABLE FIVE; THE NEXT FOUR DIGITS ARE THE RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUNBER WITHIN THE PROVINCE. ALL FIVE DIGITS ARE NEEDED TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY A RESPONDENT. _._......-..-...--........................--....-........-..

VAR 0003 REF 0003 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE NO HISSING DATA CODES



RESPONDENTS WERE WEIGHTED ACCORDING TO THEIR CONSTITUENCY OP'RESIDENCE. ALL SUBJECTS LIVING IN CONSTITUENCY X049 (ALGOKA WEST, ONTARIO) THROUGH 8080 (YENTUORTH, ONTARIO) WERE WEIGHTED BY A FACTOR OF ONE AND ONE-THIRD. RESIDENTS OF X040 (CARTIER, QUEBEC) THRU 1048 (SAINT-JACQUES, QUEBEC) (INCLUSIVE), #081 (YORK CENTRE, ONTARIO) THRU to88 (ROSEDALE, ONTARIO), AND ALL RESPONDENTS FROR BRITISH COLUKBIA WERE DOUBLE REIGHTED. THE REST OF TAE CONSTITUENCIES ARE UNWEIGHTED. SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 4 AND 6.

THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNWEIGHTED [RAU) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NOfiBER OF DATA CASES. . . . . ..*........~...............-.-............--............

1113 3. UNUEIGHTED CASES 588 4. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES #049-tO80) 417 6. DOUBLE WEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES 1040-1048, #081-

YO88, AND #ill-#118)

VAR 0004 REF 0004 DATA SET ID-'7225' NANE-DECIMAL WEIGHT VARIABLE NO RISSING DATA CODES

LOC 11 WIDTH 3 DK 2 COL 11-13 2 DEC PLACE(S)

DECIMAL YEIGHT VALUES PLEASE SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 3 AND 6.

THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNWEIGHTED (RAY) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DATA CASES.

<TUO DECIHAL PLACES ARE IHPLIED> .*.........-.._.......-..--........-...-..--...........-.-


(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .

1113 588

417

'2' *..

100. UNPEIGHTED CASES 133. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES

to49-#080) 200. DOUBLE YEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES X040-CO48,

t081-#OBE, AND 1111-(118)

DK 2 COL 14

VAR 0057 REP 0057 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-ANY PRVC/RGN BETTER OFF HD=GE 8

LOC 78 WIDTH 1 DK 2~0~15

Q. 21-A. DO YOU THINK THERE ARE ANY PROVINCES OR REGIONS OF CANADA WHICH ARE BETTER OFF THAN THE OTHERS? . . . . .._...............-.-............-...........-....--....

6123 1. YES

VAR 0058 NAHE

732 2. NO

338 8. DR. IF ANY ARE BETTER OFF 9. NA

EEF 0058 DATA SET It+'7225 XNEYFOUNDLAND BETTER OFF BD=O OR GE 8


Q- 21-B. (IF "YES") : YHICH ONES <PROVINCES OR REGIORS BETTER OFF>? <THE NABES VOLUNTEERED BY THE RESPONDENT (IF ANY) HAVE BEER CODED IN REF. NOS. 58-70 YHERE A VARIABLE REPRESENTS A SINGLE PROVINCE OR REGION.>

Q. 21-B. NEWFOUNDLAND BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REP. NO. 57) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..1...-...........--.---..-...............

33 5978

112

2070

1. YES, NEWFOUNDLAND BETTER OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT HENTION NEWFOUNDLAND

8. YES, SONE PEOVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK YHICH ONES

0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57.


VAR 0059 REP 0059 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XPRNC ED ILND BETTER OFF UD=O OR GE 8


19 5992

112

2070

:: YES, PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND BETTER OFF NO, R DOES NOT UENTION PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND

0. YES, SOHE PROVINCES OR EEGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES


VAR 0060 REP 0060 DATA SET ID-*7225' NAME-XNOVA SCOTIA BETTER OFF MD=0 OR r.F R

81 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL-'is-

Q. 21-B. PRINCE EDUARD ISLAND BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 57> .._..................-.-....-......-....-.-.........

LOC

30 5981

112

2070

:: YES, NOVA SCOTIA BETTER OFF NO, R DOES NOT BENTION NOVA SCOTIA

8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK UHICH ONES

0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57,

VAR 0061 REP 0061 DATA SET ID-'722: NAME-XNEWBRUNSRICK BETTER OFF MD=0 OR GE 8


Q. 21-R. NOVA SCOTIA BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 57) . . . . . . . . . . . ..I....-..**...*..-...-..-.-..-.

Q. 21-B. NEW BRUNSUTCK BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 57> . ..~.~.......I.......~....~...~.......~....~.

05 YES, NEW BRDNSHICK BETTER OFF 5966 :: NO, B DOES NOT MENTION NEY BRUNSWICK

112 8. YES, SOUE PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES

2070 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57.

1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STDDY PAGE 33

VAR 0062 REF 0062 NAME-XQUEBEC BETTER OFF LID=0 OR GE 8


DATA SET ID-l7225

Q. 21-B. QUEBEC BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES QR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 57> .-.--..........-_._..-......-.--........

1473 4538

112

2070

1. YES, QUEBEC BETTER OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT BENTION QUEBEC

0. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES


VAR 0063 REP 0063 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAME-XONTARIO BETTER OFF HD=O OR GE 8


Q- 21-B. ONTARIO BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 57) . . . ..*..-...-....*....*..-.--...........

4319 YES, ONTARIO BETTER OFF 1692 :: NO, R DOES NOT NENTION ONTARIO

112 0. YES, SORE PROVINCES OR EEGIOWS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES

2070 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IR REF. NO. 57,

VAR 0064 REF 0064 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAllE-XHAIITOBA BETTER OFF ?lD=O OR GE 8


Q. 21-B. HANITOBA BETTER OFF TEAN OTRER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 57) . . . . . ..-..._...-..1..*....---..-...-....

154 5857

112

2070

1. YES, NANITOBA BETTER OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT !!ENTION MANITOBA

8. YES, SOt!E PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WBICH ONES

0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REP. NO. 57.


VAR 0065 REF 0065 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XSASKATCHEWAN BETTER OFF CID=0 OR GE El


380 5631

112

2070

1. YES, SASKATCHEWAN BETTER OFF 5- NO, R DOES NOT HENTION SASKATCHEWAN

8. YES, SOHE PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WBICH ONES


VAR 0066 REF 0066 DATA SET ID-'72251

Q. 21-B. SASKATCAEWAN BETTER OFF THAN OTHEE PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 57) .I-...-.....................................

NAME-XALBERTA BETTER OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 87 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 24

Q. 21-B. ALBERTA BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 57> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-I...*......-.........

1388 1. YES, ALBERTA BETTER OFF 4623 5. NO, R DOES NOT HENTION ALBERTA

112 8. YES, SOBE PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES


VAR 0067 REP 0067 DATA SET ID-'72251 NABE-XBRIT COLBBIA BETTER OFF ilD=O OR GE 8


Q. 21-B. BRITISH COLUBBIA BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGXONS, <SEE REF. NO. 57) . ..-.......-.....I....-......--..........-......

2317 1. YES, BRITISH COLUIIBIA BETTER OFF 3694 5. NO, R DOES NOT AENTION BRITISH COLUMBIA

112 8. YES, SOBE PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES



VAR 0068 REP 0068 NAHE-XHARITINES BETTER OFF HD=O OR GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 21-B- HABITIi4ES BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 57) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.........--....-.

59::

112

2070

1. YES, RARITIBES BETTER OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT HENTION HARITInES

8. YES, SONE PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES


VAR 0069 REP 0069 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-XPRAIRIES BETTER OFF i¶D=O OR GE 8

LOC 90 WIDTH 1 DK 2 CoL 27

Q. 21-B. PRAIRIES BETTEE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 57> . ..__*.....*.**..................-.-....

323 5688

112

2070

YES, PRAIRIES BETTER OFF :: NO , R DOES NOT HENTION PRAIRIES

a. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ORES

0, INAP. CODED 2 OR a IN REP. NO. 57.

OAR 0070 REP 0070 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAnE-XSPECIPC AREA BETTER OFF ID=0 OR GE 8


Q. 21-B. SPECIFIC REGIONS OR AREAS BETTER OFF THAN OTAER PROVINCES OR REGIORS. <SEE REF. UO. 57> . . . . . . . . . ..-......-....*.....-...--.---...............--.

732 5279 ::

YES, SPECIFIC REGIONS OR AREAS BETTER OFF NO, R DOES NOT HElsTION SPECIFIC REGIONS OR AREAS

112

2070

a. YES, SOHE PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES



VAR 0071 REF 0071 NANE-ANY PRVC/RGN UORSE OFF tlD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-172251

Q. 22-A. DO YOU THINK THERE ARE ANY PROVINCES OR REGIONS OF CANADA WHICH ARE WORSE OFF THAN THE OTHERS? . . ..-.....1.__.....-..--........-..----.............--....-.

5925 553

1715

1. YES 2. NO

8. DK, IF ANY ARE WORSE OFF 9. NA

VAR 0072 REP 0072 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAKE-XNEWFOUNDLAND UORSE OFF HD=O OR GE 8

LOC 93 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 30.

Q. 22-B. (IF "YES") : WHICH ONES <PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF>? <THE NAHES VOLUNTEERED BY TAE RESPONDENT (IF ANY) HAVE BEEN CODED IN REF. NOS. 72-84 WHERE A VARIABLE REPRESENTS A SINGLE PROVINCE OR REGION.>

Q. 22-B. NEWFOUNDLAND WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO, 71> . .._...*.__.....-.-....-.........-.-.............--..

1291 4461

173

2268

1. YES, NEWFOUNDLAND WORSE OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT BENTION NEWFOUNDLAND

8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES


VAR 0073 REP 0073 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-XPRINC ED ILND YORSE OFF BD=O OR GE 8

LOC 94 WIDTR 1 DK 2COL31

Q. 22-B. PRINCE EDPARD ISLAND HORSE OFF TAAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 71> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-..-.-.-.-..-....

602 1. YES. PRINCE EDUARD ISLAND RORSE OFF 5150 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION PRINCE EDWARD ISLAUD


(CONTINUED) .--.I--....

173 8. YES, SOBE PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK UHICH ONES


VAR 0074 REP 0074 DATA SET ID-'72251 NABE-XNOVA SCOTIA WORSE OFF ND=0 OR GE 8


8. 22-B. NOVA SCOTIA WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 71> . . . . ..--...rrr...........*.......-~-...---

929 4823

173

2268

1. YES, NOVA SCOTIA UORSE OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION NOVA SCOTIA

a. YES, SOBE PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK RHICB ONES

0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REP. NO, 71.

VAR 0075 REF 0075 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-XNEW BRUNSWICK WORSE OFF BD=O OR GE 8


Q. 22-B. NEW BRUNSWICK UORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 71> __.-........*......-...-......-..........--.

886 4866

173

2268

1. YES, NEY BRUNSWICK UORSE OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT HENTION NEW BRUNSWICK

a. YES, sonE PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK UHICH ONES

0. INAP, CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71.

VAR 0076 REP 0076 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-XQUEBEC WORSE OFF ID=0 OR GE 8


Q. 22-B. QUEBEC RORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 71) .--..--..-.......-..........-........-..


(CONTINUED) . . . . . . - . . . .

802 4950

173

2268

1. YES, QUEBEC PORSE OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT BENTION QUEBEC

a. YES, SO8E PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK RHICH ONES


VAR 0077 REP 0077 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAHE-XONTARIO WORSE OFF ID=0 OR GE 8


65 5687

173

2268

1. YES, ONTARIO UORSE OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION ONTARIO

a. YES, sow PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES


VAR 0078 REP 0078 DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 22-B. ONTARIO WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 71) . . ..-....-...-.................-..--....

NAHE-X8ANITOBA UORSE OFF MD=0 OR GE U LOC 99 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 36

Q. 22-B. MANITOBA WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 71> . . . . . ..-.............---.-..............

245 5507

173

2268

YES, :: NO

8ANITOBA WORSE OFF , R DOES NOT MENTION HANITOBA

8. YES, SONE PROVINCES OR REGIOWS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES

0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. PO, 71.


VAR 0079 REP 0079 NANE-XSASKATCHEWAN WORSE OFF ID=0 OR GE 0


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 22-B. SASKATCHEUAN WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 71) . . ..-------.....*....----.....-........-...

335 5417

173

2268

YES, SASRATCHEUAN WORSE OFF :: NO , R DOES NOT RENTION SASKATCHEWAN

8. YES, SORE PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK UHICH ONES

0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REP, NO. 71.

VAR 0080 REP 0080 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XALBERTA YORSE OFF MD=0 OR GE 8


Q. 22-B. ALBERTA WORSE OFF TBAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 71> ..-I.-..............--...........-..*--.

82 1. YES, ALBERTA WORSE OFF 5670 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION ALBERTA

173 8. YES, SOLIE PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE fORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES


VAR 0081 REP 0081 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-XBRIT COLflBIA YORSE OFF HD=O OR GE 8


56 5696

173

2268

Q. 22-B. BRITISH COLUHBIA WORSE OFF THAN OTRER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 71> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-...........-.---....--.

1. YES, BRITISH COLUHBIA YORSE OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION BRITISH COLIJBBIA

8. YES, SOBE PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES

0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO, 71,

1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE UO

9AR 0082 REP 0082 NAME-XWARITICIES YORSE OFF !lD=O OR GE 8


DATA SET ID-'72251

Q- 22-B. PIARITIRES WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO, 71) . . ..I.............-..---..-.*...........

2892 2860

173

2268

:: YES, HARITIHES HORSE OFF NO, R DOES NOT BERTION IARITIIES

8. YES, SOlE PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES


VAR 0083 REF 0083 DATA SET ID-'7225' NANE-XPRAIRIES WORSE OFF LID=0 OR GE 8

LOC 104 WIDTH 1 DK 2COLUl

Q. 22-B. PRAIRIES WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 71) . . . . . . ..-....---.-................-.----

138 5614

173

2268

1. YES, PRAIRIES WORSE OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT HENTION PRAIRIES

8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE YORSE OPP, BUT DK YHICH ONES


VAR 0084 REP 0084 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XSPECIPIC AREA WORSE OFF lDf0 OR GE 8


1OlU 4738

173

2268

Q. 22-B. SPECIFIC REGIONS OR AREAS YORSE OFF THAN OTEER PROVIYCBS OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. UO. 71> . . . . .._*II_.............*---*-................-.--.-....

2: YES, SPECIFIC REGIONS OR AREAS WORSE OPP 10, R DOES NOT RENTION SPECIFIC REGIOUS OR AREAS

a. YES, SOME PBOlINCES OR PBGIORS ARE WORSE O?F, BUT DK HHXCI OUES

0. IIIAP. CODED 2 OR 8 Ill REF. NO- 71-

1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE Ul

9AR 0085 REP 0085 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-R'S OWN PVNC BTR/YRS OFF HD=O OR GE 8


Q. 23. HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THIS PROVINCE? DO YOU THINK IT IS BETTER OPF THAN HOST, WORSE OPF, OR ABOUT AVERAGE? <IF RESPONDENT'S PROYINCE YAS ROT NENTIONED IN Q. 21-B OR Q. 22-B, THEN Q. 23 HAS ASKED; OTHERWISE INTERVIEWER SKIPPED TO Q. 24> . . . . . . -..- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . m.* . . . . ..I .-....-......-I..

974 1. BETTER OFF 148 2. YORSE OFP

2456 3. ABOUT AVERAGE

169 8. DK 403 NA

4048 INAP, R's PROVINCE YAS UENTIONED IN REF. Nos. 58-70 OR REF. NOS. 72-84.

VAR 0086 REP 0086 NABE-UOULD LIKE LIVE-NUFNDLD )ID=CE 8


DATA SET I&*7225’

Q. ZC-AL. IN UEICH CANADIAN PROVINCES DO PDU THINK YOU NIGHT LIKE TO LIVE? <THE NACIES VOLUNTEERED BY THE RESPONDENT (IF ANY) HAVE BEEX CODED IN REP, NOS. 86-95 #HERE A VARIABLE REPRESENTS A SINGLE PROVINCE OR REGION.>

Q- 24-A. <YOULD II LIKE TO LIVE IN NENFOUNDLAND> . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. -.1...-...................-.-......-.-.

124 YfS, R RENTIONED NEWFOUNDLAND 7657 2: NO, R DID MOT lENTION NEWFOUNDLAND

412 8. DK YBICK PROVINCE l? YOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN

VAR 0087 RCF 0087 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-YOULD LIKE LIVE-P.E ILRD RD-GE 8

LOC 108 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL $5

<UOULD R LIKE TO LIVE IN RRIRCE EDWARD ISLAND> <SEE REF. NO. 86)


(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .

207 YES, 7570 :: NO

R !!ENTIONED PRINCE EDlARD ISLAND , R DID NOT MENTION PRINCE EDRARD ISLAND

u12 8. DK NHICH PROVINCE R YOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN

VAR 0088 REP 0088 NAME-YOULD LIKE LIVE-NOVASCOT BD=CE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

284 7497 ::

YES, R HENTIONED NOVA SCOTIA NO, R DID NOT MENTION NOVA SCOTIA

412 8. DK YHICH PROVINCE R YOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN

<WOULD R LIKE TO LIVE IN NOVA SCOTIA> <S.EE REP. NO. 86> . . . . . . . ..*...-.......--.-...~........

VAR 0089 REP 0089 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-ROULD LIKE LIVE-NENBNSYK MD=GE B


<NOULD R LIKE TO LIVE IN NEW BRONSYICK> <SEE REF. NO. 86> . . . . ..l............l.*...........-.....

319 1. YES, R MENTIONED NEA BRUNSWICK 7462 5. NO, R DID NOT MENTION NEU BRUNSUICK

412 8. DK WHICH PROVINCE R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN

VAR 0090 REP 0090 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-YOULD LIKE LIVE-QUEBEC tlD=GE 8

LOC 111 WIDTH 7 DK 2 COL 4s I

<UOULD R LIKE TO LIVE IN QUEBEC> <SEE REF. NO- B6> .? . . ..---... I . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . -

2074 1. YES, R MENTIONED QUEBEC

*


(CONTINUED) ..-.... . . . .

5707 5. NO, R DID NOT MENTION QURBEC

412 8. DK WHICH PROVINCE R UOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN

VAR 0091 REP 0091 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-WOULD LIKE LIVE-ONTARIO MD=GE 8


<UOULD R LIKE TO LIVE IN ONTARIO> <SEE REP. NO. 86> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..~.......~...-...

3234 4547 ::

YES, R MENTIONED ONTARIO NO, R DID NOT HENTION ONTARIO

412 8. DK WHICH PROVINCE R YOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN

VAR 0092 REP 0092 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-UOULD LIKE LIVE-IANITOBA MD-GE 8


<WOULD R LIKE TO LIVE XN HANITOBA> <SEE REF. NO. 86) . ..l.....s.......s.*..s.m.........

383 YES, 7398 :: NO

R CIENTIONED MANITOBA , H DID NOT MENTION MANITOBA

412 8. DK WHICH PROVINCE R UOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN

VAR 0093 BEP 0093 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-WOULD LIKE LIVE-SASKTUN MD=GE 8


<WOULD R LIKE TO LIVE IN SASKATCHEYAU> <SEE REF. NO. 86) . . . . . . . ..I... * . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . ..r..

380 1. YES, R MENTIONED SASKATCEIEYAN 7401 5. NO, R DID NOT MENTION SASKATCBEYAN

1965 CANADYAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 4U

(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .

412 8. DK YHICH PROVINCE R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN

VAR 0094 REP 0094 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-WOULD LIKE LfVE-ALBERTA lD=GE 8


<WOULD R LIKE TO LIVE IN ALBERTA> <SEE REF. NO. 86> ..I..............................

1032 1. YES, R MENTIONED ALBERTA 6749 5. NO, R DID NOT MENTION ALBERTA

412 8. DK WHICR PROVINCE R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN

VAR 0095 REP 0095 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-YOULD LIKE LIVE-BRTCOLBB BD=GE 8


<UOULD R LIKE TO LIVE IN BRITISH COLUHBIA> <SEE REP. NO. 86> . . ..*.....................................

3056 1. YES, R MENTIONED BRITISH COLDBBIA 4725 5. NO, R DID NOT KENTION BRITISH COLURBIA

412 8. DK AHICH PROVINCE R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN

VAR 0096 REP 0096 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-WOULD NOT LIVE-NUPNDLD ND=0 08 GE B


Q. 24-B. IN YHICH CANADIAN PROVINCES WOULD YOU DEFINITELY NEVER PANT TO LIVE? <TEE NAMES VOLUNTEERED BY THE RESPOKDENT (IF ANY) HAVE BEEN CODED IN BEP. NOS. 96-105 WHERE A VARIABLE REPRESENTS A SINGLE PROVINCE OR REGION.>

Q. 24-B. <R WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN NEWFOUNDLAND> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2477 1. YES, R DOES 101 YANT TO LIVE IN NEUPOUNDLAND


(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .

3194 5. NO HENTION OP NEWFOUNDLAND TO Q. 24-B

1249 8. DK WHICH PROVINCES R YOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R WODLD LIVE IN ALL THE PEOVINCES

BAR 0097 REP 0097 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-WOULD NOT LIVE-P.E ISLND BD=O OR GE 8

LOC 118 WIDTB 1 DK 2 COL 55

<R WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND> <SEE REP. NO. 96) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..~...............

1813 3858

1249 1273

:: YES, R DOES NOT WANT TO LIVR IN PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND NO HENTION OP PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND TO Q. 24-B

0. DK WHICH PROVINCES R WOULD NOT UANT TO LIVE IN 0. R UOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES

VAR 0098 REP 0098 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAUE-WOULD NOT LIVE-NOVA SCOT ID=0 OR GE 8

LOC 119 YIDTR 1 DK 2 coL 56

<R WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN NOVA SCOTIA> <SEE REP. NO. 96> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1951 1. YES, R DOES NOT WANT TO LIVE IN NOVA SCOTIA 3720 5. A0 MENTION OF NOVA SCOTIA TO Q. 24-B

1249 a. DK WHICB PROVINCES R YOULD NOT YANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R WOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES

VAR 0099 REP 0099 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAUE-WOULD NOT LIVE-NEY BNSWK ND=0 OR GE 8


<R YOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN NEW BEUwSWICK> <SEE REP. NO. 96) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


(CONTINUED) I . . . . . . . . . .

1844 YES, R DOES NOT WANT TO LIVE IN NEY BRUNSWICK 3027 :: NO HENTXON OF NEU BRUNSWICK TO Q. 24-B

1249 8. DK YHICH PROVINCES R UOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R YOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES

VAR 0100 REP 0100 DATA SET ID-'72251 NABE-WOULD NOT LIVE-QUEBEC ID=0 OR GE 8


<R WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN QUEBEC> <SEE REF. NO. 96> . . . . . . . . . ..I.. . . ..I... .I...... . .I...

2363 1, YES, R DOES NOT WANT TO LIVE IN QUEBEC 3308 5. NO HENTION OF QUEBEC TO Q. 24-B

1249 0. DK WHICH PROVINCES R WOULD NOT UANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R WOULD LIVE IN ALL TEE PROVINCES

VAR 0101 REP 0101 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-WOULD NOT LIVE-ONTARIO HD=O OR GE 8


<R WOULD NOT UANT TO LIVE IN ONTARIO> <SEE REF. NO. 96> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

057 ::

YES, R DOES NOT UANT TO LIVE IN ONTARIO U814 NO BENTION OF ONTARIO TO Q. 24-B

1249 0. DK WHICH PROVINCES E WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R WOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES

VAR 0102 REF 0102 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-UOULD NOT LIVE-NANITOBA ID=0 OR GE 8


<R WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN NANITOBA> <SEE REP. NO. 96> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..I...................


1223 4448

1249 1273

(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .

:: YES, R DOES NOT WANT TO LIVE IN HANITOBA NO HENTION OF NANITOBA TO Q. 24-B

8. DK WRICB PROVINCES R WOULD NOT YANT TO LIVE IN 0. R WOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES

VAR 0103 REP 0103 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD NOT LIVE-SASKTWN HD=O OR GE 8

LOC 124 UIDTH 1 DK 2COL61

<R WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN SASKATCHEWAN> <SEE REP. NO. 96) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1613 1. YES, A DOES NOT WANT TO LIVE IN SASKATCHEWAN 4058 5. NO KENTION OF SASKATCHEWAN TO Q. 24-B

1249 8. DK WHICH PROVINCES R WOULD NOT YANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R WOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES

VAR 0104 REP 0104 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-WOULD NOT LIVE-ALBERTA ID=0 OR GE 8


1030 4641 2:

YES, R DOES NOT WANT TO LIVE IN ALBERTA NO HENTION OF ALBERTA TO Q. 24-B

1249 8. DK WHICH PROVINCES E WOULD NOT PANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R WOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES

<R WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN ALBERTA> <SEE REF. NO. 96> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

VAR 0105 REP 0105 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD NOT LIVE-BRT COLHB HD=O 08 GE 8


<R WOULD NOT YANT TO LIVE IN BRITISH COLffIBIA> <SEE REP. NO. 96) . . . . ..I.......................................

1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTXON STUDY PAGE U8

(CONTINUED) .,........-

555 1. YES, R DOES NOT UANT TO LIVE IN BRITISH COLUNBIA 5116 5. NO RENTION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA TO Q. 24-B

1249 8. DK WHICH PROVINCES R WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R YOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES

VAR 0106 REP 0106 DATA SET ID-‘7225 NAME-DIEFENBAKR-BARTIRE CNCTN ID=0 OR GE 8

LOC 127 YIDTH 1 DK 2 CDL 64

639 1. YES 5821 5. NO

1243 8. DK 4 9. NA

486 0. DIEPENBAKER HAS TEE SAEE COUNECTIONS TO ALL REGIOYS

VAR 0107

Q- 25. THINKING NOW OF TPE NATXONAL LEADERS OF THE FOUR HAIN POLITICAL PARTIES, UHICH PART OF THE COUNTRY DO YOU THINK TfiESE MEN ARE CLOSEST TO: THE RARITIBES, QUEBEC, ONTARIO, TRE PRAIRIES OR BRITISB COLURBIA? TAKE HR. DIEFENBAKER. DOES HE NAVE RORE CONNECTION WITH THE HARITIIIES, QUEBEC, ONTARIO, THE PRAIRIES, OR BRITISH COLUfEIA?

<IS DIEFENBAKER CONRECTED PITR TRE IARITI%ES?> .,,,,.,,,.,,,,,,,..,.,.......,..........................

REP 0107 DATA SET ID-'7225 NAflE-DIEFENBAKER-QUEBEC CNCTU MD=0 OR GE B


<IS DIEFENBAKER CORNECTED UITR QUERLC?> <SEE BE?. RO. 106) . . , . , . , . . ..r.r.,,....,.................

145 YES 6315 :: NO

1243 6. DK 4 9. IA

486 0. DIBFEPBAKRP EAS TRE SAlS COYRECTIOSS TO ALL BEG1


VAR 0108 REP 0108 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-DIEPENBAKR-ONTARIO CNCTN ND=0 OR GE 8


<IS DIEPENBAKER CONNECTED UITH ONTARIO> <SEE REP. NO. 106> . . . .._..--.-...............-.....-..-...-..-...............

639 1. YES 5821 5. NO

1243 8. DK 4 9. NA

486 0. DIEPENBAKER HAS THE SAME CONNECTXOUS TO ALL REGIONS

VAR 0109 REP 0109 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DIEPENBAKR-PRAIRIE CNCTN HD=O OR GE 8

LOC 130 YIDTH 1 DK 2 cOL 67

<IS DIEPENBAKEE CONNECTED WITH THE PRAIRIES> <SEE REF. NO. 106> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.--..................-.-......---....---.

5210 YES 1250 :: NO

1243 8. DK 4 9. NA

486 0. DIEPENBAKER AAS TAE SBHE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS

VAR 0110 REP 0110 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAfiE-DIEPENBAKR-BRTCOLR CNCTN ID=0 OR GE 8

LOC 131 UIDTA 1 DK 2 COL 68

<IS DIEFENBAKER CONNECTED UITR BRITISR COLUHBIA> <SEE REP. NO. 106) _.----..__.1-......-...............-.-----......-..--......

410 1. YES 6050 5. NO

1243 8. DK 4 9. NA

486 0. DIEPENBAKER HAS THE SANE CONNECTIOIS TO ALL REGIONS


VAR 0111 REP 0111 NAME-PEARSON-BARITIIIES CNCTN BD=O OR GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

WHAT ABOUT MR. PEARSON? <IS BE CONNECTED WITH THE BARITIEES?> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

310 YES 5440 :: NO

1499 8. DK 4 9. NA

940 0. PEARSON HAS THE SAHE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS

VAR 0112 REV 0172 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-PEARSON-QUEBEC CONNECTN BD=O OR GE 8


WRAT ABOUT HR. PEARSON? <IS HE CONNECTED YITH QUEBEC?> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2198 :: YES 3552 NO

1499 8. DK 4 9. NA

940 0. PEARSON HAS THE SACIE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS

VAR 0113 REP 0113 DATA SET ID-'7225 NABE-PEARSON-ONTARIO CONNECTN KD=O OR GE 8


WHAT ABOUT RR. PEARSON? <IS HE CONNECTED YITA ONTARIO?> . . . ..*......*................*......................-.-.

4238 1. YES 1512 5. NO

1499 8. DK 4 9. NA

940 0. PEARSON HAS THE SAHE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS


VAR 0114 REP 0114 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-PEARSON-PRAIRIE CORNECTN ID=0 OR GE 8

LOC 135 UIDTR 1 DK 2 COL 72

UHAT ABOUT MR. PEARSON? <IS HE CONNECTED WITH THE PRAIRIES> . . . . . . . ..I..................................................

217 1. YES 5533 5. NO

1499 8. DK 4 NA

940 PEARSON HAS THE SAHE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS

VAR 0115 REP 0115 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-PEARSON-BRTCOLUBB CNCTN RD=O OR GE 8 .

LOC 136 RIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 13

WHAT ABOUT RR. PEARSON? <IS HE CONNECTED YITH BRITISH COLUMBIA?> ,,......,.....,............,......,....~..............

163 YES 5587 :: NO

1499 8. DK 4 9. NA

940 0. PEARSON HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS

VAR 0116 REF 0116 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-DOUGLAS-BARITIBES CNCTN BD=O OR GE 8


YAAT ABOUT MR. DOUGLAS? <IS HE CONNECTED UITA THE BARITIRES?> ,,.,..,.,..,,,.........................-..-..--...

186 YES 4495 :: NO

2739 8. DK 7 9. NA

766 0. DOUGLAS AAS THE SABE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS


VAR 0117 REP 0117 NABE-DOUGLAS-QUEBEC CONNECTN AID=0 OR GE 8


DATA SET ID-'72251

WHAT ABOUT HR. DOUGLAS? <IS HE CONNECTED UITR QUEBEC?> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

182 1. YES 4499 5. NO

2739 8, DK 7 NA

766 DOUGLAS HAS THE SAHE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS

VAR 0118 REF 0118 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-DOUGLAS-ONTARIO CONNECTN ID=0 OR GE 8



597 4084

2739 7

766

YHAT ABOUT BR. DOUGLAS? <IS HE CONNECTED UITH ONTARIO?> ,,,,..,.,,,,,.,,,..,,....,,......,.............,........

1. YES 5. NO

8. DK 9. NA 0. DOUGLAS HAS THE SAEE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS

NABE-DOUGLAS-PRAIRIE CONNECTN ID=0 OR GE 8 LOC 140 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 77

UHAT ABOUT RR. DOUGLAS? <IS HE CONNECTED UITR THE PRAIRIES> ,,,.,,.,,,..,,.....,.....,................-.................

2778 1. YES 1903 5. no

2739 8. DK 7 9. IA

766 0. DOUGLAS HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS


VAR 0120 REP 0120 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DOUGLAS-BRTCOLUBB CNCTN ID=0 OR GE 8


WHAT ABOUT HR. DOUGLAS? <IS RE COUNECTED UITH BRITISH COLUBBIA?> . ..I..................................................

1618 1. YES 3063 5. NO

2739 8. DK -I 9. NA

766 0. DOUGLAS HAS THE SARE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS

VAR 0001 REP 0001 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-ICPR STUDY NUHBER-7225 NO MISSING DATA CODES

LOC 1 YIDTH 4 DK 3 COL l- 4

STUDY NUMBER (7225) . , I , , . . I . . . . . . . . . . .

VAR 0002 REP 0002 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAHE-INTERVIER NUBBEE NO MISSING DATA CODES

LOC 5 UIDTH 5 DK 3 COL 5- 9

RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUBBEE

THE FIRST DIGIT IDENTIFIES THE PROVINCE AS CODED IN VARIABLE FIVE; THE NEXT FOUR DIGITS ARE THE RESPOBDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUBBER UITRIN THE PROVINCE. ALL FIVE DIGITS ARE NEEDED TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY a RESPONDENT. . . . . . . . . . . ..I...............................................

VAR 0003 REP 0003 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-INTEGER UEIGHT VARIABLE NO MISSING DATA CODES

LOC 10 WIDTH 1 DK 3COLlO

INTEGER UEIGHT VALUES

RESPONDENTS UERE WEIGHTED ACCORDING TO TEEIR CONSTITUENCY OP RESIDENCE. ALL SUBJECTS LIVING IN CONSTITUEUCY *049 (ALGORA WEST, ONTARIO) THROUGH lo80 (YENTYOETH, ONTARIO) AERE


(CONTINUED) . . . . ..I....

WEIGHTED BY A FACTOR OP ONE AND ONE-THIRD. RESIDENTS OP X040 (CARTIER, QUEBEC) THRU 1048 (SAINT-JACQUES, QUEBEC) (INCLUSIVE), to81 (YORK CENTRE, ONTARIO) THRU to88 (ROSEDALE, ONTARIO), AND ALL RESPONDENTS FROB BRITISH COLUMBIA WERE DOUBLE WEIGHTED. THE REST OF THE CONSTITUENCIES ARE UNYEIGHTED. SEE ALSO REP, NOS. 4 AND 6.

THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESRNT UNWEIGHTED (RAW) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUNBER OF DATA CASES. ,,,,.,.,,.,,,,,,,.,.,...,...,......,,...,..,.,..,,,.,.,,,.,,

1113 3. UNWEIGHTED CASES 588 4. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CORSTITUENCIES 1049-1080) 417 6. DOUBLE WEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES #040-t048, #081-

CO88, AND till-1118)

VAR 0004 REP 0004 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAflE-DECIKAL WEIGHT VARIABLE NO KISSING DATA CODES

LOC 11 UIDTH 3 DK 3 COL 11-13 2 DEC PLACE(S)

DECIBAL UEIGHT VALUES PLEASE SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 3 AND 6.

THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNUEIGHTED (RAU) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUEBER OF DATA CASES.

<TWO DECIRAL PLACES ARE IBPLIED> ..r..,,,..,.,.,.,..,.,,,.....,,,.,,.,,,.....,......,*.....

1113 100. UNWEIGHTED CASES 588 133. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES

X049-:080) 417 200. DOUBLE YEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES t040-*048,

#081-X088, AND Clll-X118)

'3' . . .

DK 3COL14


VAR 0121 REF 0121 NARE-THOMPSON-RARITIBES CRCTN MD=0 OR GE B


PAGE 55

DATA SET ID-'72251

WHAT ABOUT HR. THORPSON? <IS HE CONNECTED WITH TBE ClARITIRES?> -....*.................................-.....-.....

128 1. YES 3910 5. NO

3728 8. DK 7 9. NA

420 0. THOBPSON HAS THE SAHE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS

VAR 0122 REF 0122 DATA SET ID-172251 NAME-THOBPSON-QUEBEC CONNECTN LID=0 OR GE 8


PHAT ABOUT RR. TEOMPSON? <IS HE CONNECTED UITH QUEBEC?> . . . . . . . . . ..__...-1._..-...--.-.-...-.--..-....-.........

291 YES 3747 :: NO

3728 8. DK 7 9. NA

420 0. THOMPSON HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS

VAR 0123 REP 0123 DATA SET,ID-'7225' NAME-THOBPSON-ONTARIO CNCTN flD=O OR GE 8


YAAT ABOUT HR. THOMPSON? <IS HE CONNECTED YITH ONTARIO?> *.-...................-..................................

471 YES 3567 :: NO

3728 8. DK 7 9. WA

420 0. THOMPSON AAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS


VAR 0124 REP 0124 DATA SET ID-'72251 NARE-THOMPSON-PRAIRIES CNCTN BD=O OR GE 8


UHAT ABOUT RR. THOBPSON? <IS HE CONNECTED WITH THE PRAIRIES?> . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.-_-._...-.--.--................-....

2669 1. YES 1369 5. NO

3720 8. DK 7 9. NA

420 0. THOHPSON HAS THE SABE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS

VAR 0125 REP 0125 NABE-THOHPSON-BRTCOLNBA CNCTN fiD=O

LOC 146 YIDTH 1 DK 3

WHAT ABOUT HR. THOHPSON? COLUEBIA?>

DATA SET ID-'7225' OR GE 8 COL 19

<IS BE CONNECTED RITH BRITISH

766 YES 3272 :: NO

3720 0. DK 7 9. WA

420 0. THOHPSON HAS THE SAHE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS

VAR 0126 REP 0126 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-CAOUETTE-HARITIBES CNCTN ID=0 OR GE 0


WHAT ABOUT RR. CAOUETTE? <IS HE CONNECTED HITH THE EARITIHES?> . ..--..-...-.-1---.1..-.-..-.---.....--..--..-.---.

62:: :: NO YES

1744 8. DK 19 9. NA

104 0. CAOUETTE RAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS.


VAR 0127 REF 0127 DATA SET ID-972251 NANE-CAOUETTE-QUEBEC CONNECTN HD=O OR GE B


UHAT ABOUT RR. CAOUETTE? <IS HE CONNECTED WITH QUEBEC?> .*.........--.-...-.....-....-..-..............-...-....

6190 1. YES 136 5. NO

1744 8, DK 19 9. AA

104 0. CAOUETTE HAS THE SANE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS.

VAR 0128 REF 0128 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-CAOUETTE-ONTARIO CNCTN ED=0 OR GE 8.


WHAT ABOUT RR. CAOUETTE? <IS HE CONNECTED UITH ONTARIO?> ..~~~..~.........~1~.~~....~....~...~....~..~.........~..

52 1. YES 6274 5. NO

1744 8. DK 19 9. NA

104 0. CAOUETTE HAS THE SAME CONWECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS.

VAR 0129 REP 0129 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CAOUETTE-PRAIRIES CNCTN ID=0 OR GE 8


25 1. YES 6301 5. NO

1744 19

104

DK t: NA 0. CAOUETTE HAS THE SAlE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS.

UHAT ABOUT RR. CAOUETTE? <IS HE CONNECTED YITR THE PRAIEIES?> . . . ..1---...........--..-.--.--.......-.-.....-....


BAR 0130 REP 0130 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CAOUETTE-BRTCOLNBA CNCTN ID=0 OR GE B


WHAT ABOUT 8R. CAOUETTE? <IS HE CONNECTED WITH BRITISH COLUNBIA?> . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-._........-..--........-.-.........--..

25 1. YES 6301 5. NO

1744 8. DK 19 9. NA

104 0. CAOUETTE HAS THE SAHE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS.

VAR 0131 REF 0131 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-BEST PRI@lE HINISTER UD=GE 80 IULT RESPS 2


Q. 26. WHICH POLITICAL FIGURE TODAY DO YOU THINK WOULD HAKX THE BEST PRIflE MINISTER FOR CANADA? . . ..*_...........I....................--..-.......-.--......

675 01, JOHN DIEFENBAKER 1230 02. LESTER PEARSON

888 03. TOlKY DOUGLAS 201 04. TONMY THONPSON 138 05. REAL CAOUETTE 507 06. GEORGE HEES 420 07. PAUL IIARTIN 155 08. ROBERT WINTERS 199 09. JORN ROBART 120 10. DAVID FULTON

67 11. HITCHELL SHARPE 453 12. JEAN LESAGE 168 13. RENE LEVESQUE

964 80. MISCELLANEOUS HENTIONS 4 90. MORE THAN TIO MENTIONS

7904 92. NO SECOND HENTION 417 96. CAN'T ANSWER: NO IDEA

1591 98. DK 197 99. NA


VAR 0132 REF 0132 DATA SET I~-'72251 NANE-DFRNC BTVN FEDERAL PTYS HD=GE 8


8. 27. ONE OF THE TAINGS PE ARE INTERESTED IN IS THE DIFFERENCES WHICH EXIST BETVEEN OUR FEDERAL POLITICAL PARTIES. CONSIDERING EVERYTHING THE PARTIES STAND FOR, WOULD YOU SAY THAT THERE IS A GOOD DEAL OF DIFFERENCE BETVEEN THE PARTIES, SONE DIFFERENCE, OR NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE? .--.-...*..*..........-....---..*..-....-..-.........-.

1970 1. GOOD DEAL OF DIFFERENCE 2937 2. SOME DIFFERENCE 2893 3. NOT NUCR DIFFERENCE

385 8. DK 8 9. NA

VAR 0133 REF 0133 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-FEDERAL PTYS HOST ALIKE ID=GE 83

LOC 157 VIDTR 2 DK 3 COL 30-31

Q. 28-A. WHICH OF OUR FEDERAL POLITICAL PARTIES DO YOU FEEL ARE MOST ALIKE? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..**.-.--..*.........-...-......-...*-..-.....

4490 12. LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE 539 13. LIBERAL-NDP 224 14. LIBERAL-SOCIAL CREDIT

55 15. LIBERAL-CREDITISTE 13 16. LIBBRAL-CCP 57 18. LIBERAL-OTHER

152 219

19

9"

23. CONSERVATIVE-NDP 24. CONSERVATIVE-SOCIAL CREDIT 25. CONSERVATIVE-CREDITISTE 26. CONSERVATIVE-CCF 28. CONSERVATIVE-OTHER

239 34. NDP-SOCIAL CREDIT 44 35. NDP-CREDITISTE

4 36. NDP-CCP 6 38. NDP-OTHEB

103 45. SOCIAL CREDIT-CREDITISTE 6 46. 5OCIAL CREDIT-CCF

1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PACE 60

120 109

26 101

1639 a

(CONTINUED) . . . . I . . . ..I

48. SOCIAL CREDIT-OTRER

56. CREDITISTE-CCP 58. CREDITISTE-OTHER

68. CCP-OTHER

81. ALL THE SAIE 82. ALL DIFFERENT

83. ONLY ONE PARTY RERTIONED 84. MORE THAN TYO PARTIES HENTIORED 98. DK 99. N.A.

VAR 0134 REF 0134 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-FEDERAL PTYs LEAST ALIKE llD=GE 83

LOC 159 VIDTA 2 DK 3 cOL 32-33

Q. 28-B. WHICH OP OUR FEDERAL POLITICAL PARTIES ARE LEAST ALIKE? ..*_.......-..........-..-....-......-..-....--...........

625 12. LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE 562 13. LIBERAL-NDP 470 14. LIBERAL-SOCIAL CREDIT 436 15. LIBBRAL-CREDITISTE

26 16. LIBERAL-CCF 31 18. LIBERAL-OTHER

688 23. CONSERVATIVE-RDP 41s 24. CONSERVATIVE-SOCIAL CREDIT 373 25. CONSERVATIVE-CBEDITISTE

19 26, CONSERVATIVE-CCF 62 28. CONSERVATIVE-OTRER

785 460

20

34. NDP-SOCIAL CREDIT 35. HDP-CREDITISTE 36. NDP-CCF 38. NDP-OTHER

114 45. SOCIAL CBBDIT-CREDITISTE 29 46. SOCIAL CREDIT-CCP 39 48. SOCIAL CBEDIT-OTEER

6 56. CREDITISTE-CC? 29 sa. CREDITISTE-OTBER

f


(CONTINUED) . . . . ..m..*.

54 56

354 487

2045 a

VAR 0135 NINE-WCH

LOC

3628 2769 1449

276 71


68. CCP-OTHER

81. ALL THE SAME 82. ALL DIFFERENT

63. ONLY ONE PARTY KENTIONED 84. HORE THAN TUO PARTIES BEUTIOKED 98. DK 99. %A

REP 0135 DATA SET ID-'7225' PTY GOVERNS HATTERS KD=GE 8 161 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 34

Q. 29. IN YOUR OPINION, DO YOU THINK IT HAKES A GREAT DEAL OF DIFFERENCE, SOBE DIFFERENCE, OR NO DIFFERENCE, YAICH POLITICAL PARTY RUNS THIS COUNTRY? . . . . . . . . . . ..-.....-.....-..--............-..........--.-...

1. GREAT DEAL 2. SOBE DIFFERENCE 3. NO DIFFERENCE

8. DK 9. NA

NAHE-IDEAL PTY-OLD/UODERN BD=GE 8 LOC 162 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 35

Q. 30. (SHOY CARD), NOY I RAVE A DIFFERENT KIND OF QUESTION FOR YOU. I'll GOING TO SHOW YOU SOBE WORD PAIRS. EACA PAIR IS SEPARATED BY SEVEN BOXES LIKE THIS. IF IOU THINK TEAT TEE PARTICULAR POLITICAL PARTY IS VERY WELL KNOUN, YOU WOULD PUT A CBECK flARK IN THE BOX ON THE LEFT END OF THE SCALE. IF YOU PEEL IT IS NOT KNOWN AT ALL, YOO YOULD CHECK THE BOX ON THE RIGHT END OP THE SCALE. OR YOU EIGHT RATE IT SOKEPHERE BETHEEN TRESE TWO EITRBNES.

A. FIRST, WE'LL START UITH AN IHAGLNART POLITICAL PARTY-THE ONE YOU BOULD CONSIDER IDEAL FOR CANADA.


(CONTINUED)

THE IDEAL PARTY . . . . . ..-..-*I--

109 1. OUT OF DATE 109 2. 122 3. 966 4.

1082 5. 1500 6. 3967 7, MODERN

338 8. DK

VAR 0137 REP 0137 NANE-IDEAL PTY-CMPTNT/INCklPTN ND-GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

(30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REP. NO. 136> . . . . . . . ..--.-.r.......-..--.-..........-.-.---..............

6354 :: CONPETENT 742 207 3. 262 4.

53 5. 61 6. 91 7. INCORPETENT

343 8. DK

VAR 0138 REP 0138 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-IDEAL PTP-POIERFUL/YEAK HD=GE 8


.OO. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REP, NO- 136> -* . . . . . . . *.-mm . ..I...... m-1-. -.--.......-....--..........-..

3811 1. POYERFUL 1445 2. 1530 3.

870 4. 97 5.


(CONTINUED) I..........

38 6. 53 7, WEAK

349 8. DK

VAR 0139 REP 0139 NAIIE-IDEAL PTY-POOLISH/UISE ID=GE 8


129 1. FOOLISH 58 2. 62 3.

258 4. 369 5. 876 6.

6087 7. WISE

354 8. DK

DATA SET ID-'7225'

(30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REP. NO. 136) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .._.......-...............-.....---...-.-...

VAR 0140 REP 0140 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-IDEAL PTY-HID/HRKG CLS ID=GE 8


(30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136> --....................................................-.....

509 231 377

3922 505 383

1881

1. FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS 2. 3. 4. 5.

4: FOR THE WORKING CLASS

385 0. DK


VAR 0141 REP 0141 NAME-IDEAL PTY-UNITED/SPLIT KD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

<30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136> . . ..-..__................-..................................

5413 1. UNITED 942 2. 590 3. 601 4. 132 5.

62 6. 108 7. SPLIT

345 8. DK

VAR 0142 REF 0142 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-IDEAL PTY-BAD/GOOD IJD=GE 8

LOC 168 WIDTH 1 DK 3COL41

(30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136) . . . . . . . . . . . ..1..--.-.............--...-..-.-..-..-...*......

103 1, BAD 36 2. 49 3.

252 321 2: 725 6.

6357 7. GOOD

350 8, DK

VAR 0143 REP 0143 NAHE-IDEAL PTY-LEFT/RIGHT KD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

(30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY ?OR CABADA. SEE REF. NO. 136) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-...--..............-....-...-....-..-.....


321 1. LEFT WING 174 2. 432 3.

3849 4. 675 5. 558 6.

1581 7. RIGHT WING

603 8. DK

(CONTINUED) . . ..w......

VAR 0144 REF 0144 NANE-IDEAL PTY-STG/PEAK NIND llD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

4849 1. STRONG-HIYDED 1531 2.

748 3. 522 4.

69 5. 40 6. 68 7. WEAK-RINDED

358 8. DK

(30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136) ..-.1.............1._-...--.......-.......----...............

VAR 0145 REr 0145 NARE-IDEAL PTT-iiONEST/DBONEST f!lD=GE 6


DATA SET ID-'7225'

6844 1. HONEST 526 2.

(30. A. R'S RATIBG OF IDZAl. PAITT POR CAliADA, SEE RL?. MO. 136> -................_*................-......*...*..-...-...*..

230 3. 196 4.

18 5. 16 6. 48 7. DISHONEST


(CONTINUED) . . . . . . .I...

313 8. DK

VAR 0146 REF 0146 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAKE-IDEAL PTY-DULL/EXCITING MD=GE 8


(30. A. R'S RATIRG OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136>

. . . . . . . . . . . ..I. . ..I.. . I... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

92 43

133 1785 1520 1476 2757

1. DULL 2. 3.

6. 7. EXCITING

387 8. DK

VAR 0147 REF 0147 NAME-IDEAL PTY-YOUNG/OLD HD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

1847 894

1222 3144

464 149 116

355

(30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

:: YOUNG

3.

i: 6. 7. OLD

8. DK


VAR OlU8 REP 0148 NACIE-IDEAL PTY-SLOW/PAST HD=GE 8


PAGB 67

DATA SET ID-'7225'

(30, A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. HO. 136> . . . . . ..-.._.....................-..-...----...............-.

129 1. SLOW 100 2. 177 3.

2550 4. 1491 5. 1512 6. 1900 7. FAST

334 8. DK

VAR 0149 REP 0149 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAilE-LBRL PTY-OLD/HODBRN fiD=GE 8


30. B. NOW YOU CAN GO OA TO EACH OF CANADA'S FEDERAL PARTIES.

<R'S EATING OF LIBERAL PARTY. SEE REF. NO- 136> . . . . . . . ..--...-...-....-......................-......

695 1. 549 2. 975 3.

2046 4. 1445 5.

977 6. 1068 7.

438 8.

VAR 0150 REP 0150

OUT OF DATE

flODERN

DK

NAUE-LBRL PTY-CHPTNT/INCRPTNT ID=GB 8 LOC 176 VIDTA 1 DK 3 COL 49

DATA SET ID-'7225'

<R'S RATING OF LIBERAL PARTY. SEE REP, NO. 136> -...r.........-r..l-...-..~.....................


(CONTINUED) .e . . . . . . . . .

1301 1. COHPETENT 1106 2. 1560 3. 1725 4.

859 5.

583 614 ;: INCOHPETENT

445 8. DK

VAR 0151 REP 0151 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LBRL PTY-POYERFUL/YEAK l!lD=GE 8

LOC 177 YIDTR 1 DK 3 COL 50

<R'S RATIRG OF LIBERAL PARTY. SEE REP. NO. 136> . . . . . . ..-....................-...........-......

878 1. POWERFUL 783 2.

1230 3. 1926 4. 1178 5.

763 6. 1007 7. PEAK

428 8. DK

VAR 0152 REP 0152 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LBRL PTY-POOLISR/WISE HD=GE 8


<R'S RATING OF LIBERAL PARTY. SEE REP. NO. 136> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..*..----.............--...-

369 1. FOOLISH 255 2. 760 3.

2368 4. 1636 5. 1157 6. 1179 7. WISE

469 8. DK


VAR 0153 REF 0153 NAME-LBRL PTY-BIDDLE/URKG CLS BD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'72251

1086 724

1296 3021

642 350 549

1. FOR THE NIDDLE CLASS 2. 3.

2: 6. 7. FOR TEE YORKING CLASS

525 8, DK

<R'S RATING OF LIBERAL PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136> . . . . . . ..l__*_.._-..-..-..........-.-......-.-...

VAR 0154 REP 0154 NAflE-LBRL PTY-UNITED/SPLIT BD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

<R'S RATING OF LIBERAL PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136> . . . . . . . . .._1....-.--.......-..-.-..............*

1413 1. UNITED 1152 2. 1285 3. 1519 4. 1025 5. 549 6. 787 7. SPLIT

463 8. DK

VAR 0155 REP 0155 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LBRL PTY-BAD/GOOD BD=GE 8


<R'S RATING OF LIBERAL PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136) . . ..---..._.*........................-....-.-...

u34 1. BAD 302 2. 699 3.


[CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .

2145 4. 1573 5. 1233 6. 1343 7. GOOD

464 8. DK

VAR 0156 REP 0156 NAME-LBRL PTY-LEFT/RIGHT BD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'72251

<R'S RATING OF LIBERAL PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136> . ..i.-....*........-.................-*..-......

330 1. LEFT WING 274 2. 702 3.

3335 4. 1088 5.

761 932 :: RIGHT YING

771 8. DK

VAR 0157 REP 0157 NABE-LBRL PTY-STNG/YEAK BIND BD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

1217 1104 1396 1823 957 576 644

476

<R'S RATING OF LIBERAL PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136) ...l..........-.......--- -...--.........-.......

1. STRONG-NINDED 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7, YEAR-MINDED

8. DK


VAR 0158 REP 0158 NAME-LBRL PTY-HONEST/DHONEST BD=GE 8


PAGE 71

DATA SET ID-'72251

<R'S RATING OF LIBERAL PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136) ..I.............-...--....--....................

1400 1. HONEST 1268 2. 1414 3.

1935 955 z: 421 337 ? DISHONEST

463 8. DK

VAR 0159 REP 0159 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAflE-LBRL PTY-DULL/EXCITING HD=GE 8


<R'S RATING OF LIBERAL PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136) . ..1-.._-....1.1-.............-....-...-.--*....

747 1. DULL 743 2.

1320 3, 2574 4. 1069 5. 657 6. 583 7. EXCITING

500 8. DK

VAR 0160 REP 0160 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-LBRL PTY-YOUNG/OLD RD=GE 8


<R'S RATING OF LIBERAL PARTY. SEE REF- NO. 136) .-.--........................--.--..............

393 1. YOUNG 283 2. 630 3.


(CONTINUED) . I . . . . . I . . .

2485 4. 1544 5.

1091 1299 ;: OLD

468 8. DK

VAR 0161 REP 0161 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-LBRL PTY-SLOW/FAST HD=GE 8


<R'S RATING OF LIBERAL PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136> . . . . . . . ..~......I...-~~.......~..~...~...*......

1045 1. SLOW 843 2.

1397 3. 2u12 4. 1085 5.

522 6. 445 7. FAST

444 8. DK

V AR 0162 REP 0162 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CNSVTV PTY-OLD/?lODEPN ID=GE 8

LOC 188 liIDTtl 1 DK 3COL61

<R'S BATING OF COASBRVATIVB PARTY- SEE REF. NO. 136> . . . .._.....1............-........-..-.........--.-...

1133 OUT OF DATE 883 ::

1370 3. 1978 Y. 953 5. 593 6. 714 7. l4ODLRl

569 8. DK


VAR 0163 REP 0163 NAME-CNSVTV PTY-CRPTN/INCRPTN HD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

1068 1. COUPETENT 906 2.

1269 3. 1714 4. 1223 5.

672 6. 761 7. INCORPETENT

580 8. DK

<R'S RATING OF CONSERVATIVE PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136) --..1..............-....--.-.-................-..-...

VAR 0164 REF 0164 HARE-CNSVTV PTY-POUERFUL/RLAR BD=GB 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

<R'S RATING OF CONSERVATIVE PARTY. SEE REF. 110. 136> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..--...-.....-........-....-......

652 1. POWERFUL 644 2.

1078 3. 1702 4. 1758 5.

873 6. 926 7. YEAK

560 8. DK

VAR 0165 REF 0165 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAUE-CNSVTV PTI-FOOLISlI/RISB RD=GE 8


<R'S RATING OF CONSBRYATIFR PARTY. SEE REF. 10. 136) . . . . . . . .._...._1.....................-.--.*..--.---..

492 FOOLISH 432 ::

1084 3.


(CONTINUED) ..-..-.....

2375 1404 2: 885 6. 944 7. WISE

577 8. DK

VAR 0166 REP 0166 NAClE-CNSVTV PTY-HID/YRKG CLS EID=GE 8


995 864

1154 2998

663 418 493

1. FOR THE BIDDLE CLASS L. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. FOR THE UORKING CLASS

608 8. DK

DATA SET ID-'7225'

<R'S RATING OF CONSERVATIVE PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136) . . ..__..-............................-...............

VAX 0167 REP 0167 NAME-CNSVTV PTP-UNITED/SPLIT ID=GE 8

LOC 193 WIDTH 1 DK 3 coL 66

DATA SET ID-'7225'

874 1, UNITED 723 2. 900 3.

1524 4. 1410 5. 1092 6. 1097 7. SPLIT

573 8. DK

<R'S RATING OF CONSERVATIVE PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136) . . . . . . . . . . . . ..____-...-..........-...............-...


VAR 0168 REP 0168 NAME-CNSVTV PTY-BAD/GOOD LID=GE 8


PAGE 75

DATA SET ID-'7225'

<R'S RATING OF CONSERVATIVE PARTY. SEE REP. NO. 136> .--.-..............................................--

427 1. BAD 485 2. 880 3.

2479 4. 1373 5. 985 6. 998 7. GOOD

566 8. DK

VAR 0169 REF 0169 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-CNSVTV PTY-LEPT/RIGHT LID=GE 8


<R'S RATING OF COBSERVATIVE PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136> . . . ..rl.~........rrr.-...............................

250 1. LEFT WING 267 2. 529 3.

3121 4. 1160 5.

927 6. 1065 7. RIGHT WING

874 8. DK

VAR 0170 REF 0170 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CNSVTV PTY-STG/UEAK RIND ID=GE 8

LOC 196 YIDTA 1 DK 3 COL 69

<R'S RATING OF CONSERVATIVE PARTY. SEE REF. 80. 136) . . . . ..l..--...-...._--.--..-..-... -..~..~....-".....

1220 1. STRONG-MINDED 1189 2. 1333 3.


(CONTINUED) ..a.-......

1685 1122 2

531 6. 538 7. WEAK-MINDED

575 8. DK

VAR 0171 BEP 0171 NINE-CNSVTV PTX-HOREST/DHONST LID=GE 8


1688 1514 1443 2108

550 155 173

1. HONEST 2. 3.

z: 6. 7. DISHONEST

562 8. DR

DATA SET ID-'7225'

<R'S RATING OF COUSERVATIVE PARTY. SEE REP. NO. 136) --.a . . . . . . . . . --.I- I........ -..- . . . . . . . . ..I.. -- I......

VAR 0172 REP 0172 NAME-CNSVTV PTX-DOLL/EXCITING HD=GE 8

LOC 198 WIDTH 1 DK 3COLfl

DATA SET ID-'72251

<B'S RATING OP CONSERVATIVE PARTY. SEE REP. ND. 136) . . . . . . . . . ..-.........-............-.--..........-.--.

906 1. DULL 860

1256 :: 2351 4. 1056 5.

638 550 :: EXCITING

576 6. DK


VAR 0173 REP 0173 NAUE-CNSVTV PTX-YOUNG/OLD HD=GE 8


DATA SET fD-'7225a

302 1. YOUNG 260 2. 517 3-

2152 4. 1543 5. 1262 6. 1582 7. OLD

575 8. DK

<R'S EATING OF CONSERVATIVE PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136> . . . . . ..*.-*-....*.--.-.-..-...-.....--...-.-.........

VAR 0174 REP 0174 DATA SET ID-'7225' NANE-CNSVTV PTX-SLOW/FAST BD=GE 8

LOC 200 DIDTR 1 DK 3 COL 73

<R'S RATING OF CONSERVATIVE PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136> -._................................-.................

993 1. SLOR 944 2.

1318 3. 2680 4.

940 5. 433 6. 327 7. FAST

558 8. DK

VAR 0001 REF 0001 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAf'IE-ICPR STUDY NUNBEE- NO HISSING DATA CODES

LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 4COL l-4

STUDY NUBBEB (7225) . ..-1.1s1w.1.......

1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDX PAGE 78

VAR 0002 REP 0002 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-INTERVIEW NUBBER NO EISSING DATA CODES

LOC 5 UIDTA 5 DK 4 COL s- 9

RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

THE FIRST DIGIT IDENTIFIES THE PROVINCE AS CODED IN VARIABLE FIVE; THE NEXT FOUR DIGITS ARE THE RESP~NDENT*S IDENTIFICATION NUMBER WITHIN THE PROVINCE. ALL FIVE DIGITS ARE NEEDED TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY A RESPONDENT.

VAR 0003 REP 0003 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAKE-INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE NO KISSING DATA CODES

LOC 10 U.IDTH 1 DK 4COLlO

INTEGER YEIGHT VALUES

RESPONDENTS WERE UEIGHTED ACCORDING TO THEIR CONSTITUENCY OF RESIDENCE. ALL SUBJECTS LIVING IN CONSTITUENCY #049 (ALGOBA WEST, ONTARIO) THROUGH YO80 (UENTWOBTH, ONTARIO) WERE WEIGHTED BY A FACTOR OF ONE AND ONE-THIRD. RESIDENTS OF t040 (CARTIER, QUEBEC) TBRU CO48 (SAIYT-JACQUES, QUEBEC) (INCLUSIVE), #081 (YORK CENTBE, ONTARIO) THRU CO88 (ROSEDALE, ONTARIO), AND ALL RESPONDENTS FROfl BRITISH COLUBBIA HERE DOUBLE UEIGBTED. THE REST OF THE CONSTITUENCIES ARE UNWEIGHTED. SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 4 AND 6.

TBE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNWEIGBTED (RAY) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DATA CASES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..--.......-..*...-.......-......-.---...

1113 3. UNYEIGHTED CASES 588 4, WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES t049-1080) 417 6. DOUBLE UEIGRTED (CONSTITUENCIES #040-4048, COBl-

t088, AND till-tll8)

VAR 0004 REF 0004 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-DECINAL BEIGHT VARIABLE NO MISSING DATA CODES

LOC 11 WIDTH 3 DK 4 COL 11-13 2 DEC PLACE(S)

DECIMAL WEIGHT VALUES PLEASE SEE ALSO REP. NOS. 3 AND 6.


(CONTINUED) _...__.I...

THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT IJNWEIGHTED (RAY) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DATA CASES.

<TWO DECIMAL PLACES ARE InPLIED> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-I................-...................--.

1113 5A8

417

100. UNYEIGHTED CASES 133. UEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES

#049-,080) 200. DOUBLE UEIGHTED (cONSTITUENCIES #040-CO48,

#081-#088, AND Illl-C118)

'4' DK 4 COL 14 . . .

VAR 0175 REP 0175 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAKE-NDP PTY-OLD/MODERN BD=GE 8


<R'S RATING OF NEU DElOCRATIC PARTY (NDP). SEE REF. NO. 136> . . ..-....................-...-...-.....--.--...--....*..

332 1. OUT OF DATE 180 2. 251 3.

1242 4. 1278 5. 1588 6. 1999 7. MODERN

1323 8. DK

VAR 0176 REF 0176 NAUE-NDP PTX-CHPTNT/INCEPTNT RD=GE 8


1171 929

<R'S RATING OF NDP. SEE REF. NO. 136> . . . . . . . .._-..-...-I.........-......--.

1. COKPETENX' 2.

DATA SET ID-'7225'


(CONTINUED) I.* . . ..I...

1099 3.

1996 746 :: 493 6. 442 7. INCOMPETENT

1317 8. DK

VAR 0177 REF 0177 NAKE-NDP PTX-POUERFUL/WEAK HD=GE 8


403 1. POWERFUL 434 2. 720 3.

1794 4. 1139 5. 1193 6. 1196 7. REAR

1314 8. DK

VAR 0178 REP 0178 DATA SET ID-17225

<R'S RATING OF NDP. SEE REF. NO. 136> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I.... --..-.a . . . ..I....

NAKE-NDP PTY-FOOLISii/NISE KD=GE B LOC 204 HIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 18

346 294 601

2303 1374

869 1062

1. FOOLISH 2. 3.

2: 6. 7. WISE

1344 0. DK

<R'S RATING OF NDP. SEE REP. NO. 136> .-...................-.--..-.-........

DATA SET ID-O7225


VAR 0179 REP 0179 NAKE-NDP PTY-KIDDLE/YORKG CLS BD=GE 8


<R'S RATING OF NDP. SEE REF. NO. 136> .I.-.-- I................... - I.... -s-.1

204 1. FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS 188 2. 212 3.

1885 4. 1014 5. 1203 6. 2143 7. FOR TAE WORKING CLASS

1344 8. DK

VAR 0180 BEF 0180 NAME-NDP PTY-UNITED/SPLIT BD=GE 8


<R'S RATING OF NDP. SEE REF. NO. 136) -...I-.........-...................-..

1723 1. UNITED 1339 2,

960 3. 1647 4.

499 5. 282 381 ;: SPLIT

1362 8. DK

VAR 0181 REP 0181 NABE-NDP PTX-BAD/GOOD lD=GE 8


<R'S RATING OF NDP. SEE REF. NO. 136> -..................I..-*.-..--...-..-.

PAGE 81

DATA SET ID-'7225'

DATA SET ID-'7225'

DATA SET ID-'7225'

311 1. BAD 287 2. 504 3.


(CONTINUED) . . I . . . . . . . .

2294 4. 1220 5.

991 1257 G: GOOD

1329 8. DK

VAR 0182 REP 0182 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-NDP PTY-LEFT/RIGHT LID=GE 8


<R'S RATING OF NDP. SEE REF. NO. 136) . . . . . a . . . . . . . . . . . ~.~~~..~..----.- 1.1..

936 1. LEFT WING 716 2. 935 3.

2730 536 Z: 349 428 ;: RIGHT WING

1563 8. DK

VAR 0183 REP 0183 NAKE-NDP PTY-STRONG/YEAR MIND HD=GE 8


<E'S RATING OF NDP, SEE REF. NO. 136> .-........_._-.-.-....................

1495 1. STRONG-IIINDED 1384 2. 1369 3. 1680 4.

485 5. 193 244 ;: WEAK-MINDED

1343 8. DK

DATA SET ID-'7225'


VAR 0184 REP 0184 NAME-NDP PTY-HONEST/DISHONEST BD=GE 8

LOC 210 NIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 24

2011 1485 1068 1921

188 63

127

1. HONEST

:: 4. 5. 6. 7. DISHONEST

1330 0. DK

<R'S EATING OF NDP. SEE REP. NO. 136> ~~.~~..~~~~~.~I..~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11..

VAR 0185 REP 0185 NAME-NDP PTY-DULL/EXCITING ND=GE 8


<R'S RATING OF NDP. SEE REF. NO. 136> . . . . . . . . . ..I...........-..-..--....-..

292 1. DULL 290 2. 560 3.

2390 1430 2: 1107 6.

783 7. EXCITING

1333 8. DK

VAR 0186 REP 0186 NAHE-NDP PTY-YOUNG/OLD ND=GE 8

LOC 212 UIDTB 1 DK 4 COL 26

<R'S RATING OF NDP. SEE REF. NO. 136) ..~........1...1.~....................

DATA SET ID-'7225'

DATA SET ID-'7225'

DATA SET ID-'7225'

1337 1. YOUNG 1473 2, 1462 3.


(CONTINUED) ...mmeIe.s.

1943 4. 335 5. 140 6. 172 7, OLD

1331 8. DK

VAR 0187 REF 0187 NANE-NDP PTY-SLOW/FAST ID=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

<R'S RATING OF NDP. SEE REF. NO. 136) . . . ..-...................-*-..........

250 1. SLOY 301 2. 566 3.

2879 4, 1226 5.

981 6. 652 7. FAST

1338 8. DK

VAR 0188 REF 0188 DATA SET ID-'72.25' NANE-SOCRDT PTY-OLD/HODERN ID=GE 0


739 434 609

1586 1055

929 986

1. OUT OF DATE 2. 3. 4. 5.

;: RODERN

1855 8. DK

<R'S RATING OF SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-......-...--.....-.......


VAR 0189 REP 0189 NAHE-SOCRDT PTY-CHPTN/INCRPTN RD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

684 639 917

1707 877 724 775

<R'S RATING OF SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..I..................................

1. CORPETENT L. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. INCORPRTEBT

1870 8. DK

VAR 0190 REF 0190 NAKE-SOCRDT PTY-POWERFUL/WEAK HD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

<R'S RATING OF SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY. SEE REP. NO. 136> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

388 284 622

1476 856 1133 1585

1. POWERFUL 2. 3.

2 6. 7. YEAR

1849 8. DK

VAR 0191 REP 0191 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-SOCRDT PTY-FOOLISfi/WISE RD=GE 8

LOC 217 WIDTH 1 DK 4COL31

<R'S RATING OF SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY. SEE REF. 80. 136) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

597 1. POOLISA 566 2. 909 3.


(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . ..I

2067 4. 996 5. 644 6. 548 7. VISE

1866 8. DK

VAR 0192 REF 0192 NAME-SOCRDT PTP-MID/YRKG CLS IlD=GE 8

LOC 218 N'IDTH 1 DK 4 COL 32

DATA SET ID-'7225'

<R'S RATING OF SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

390 1. FOR THE NIDDLE CLASS 246 2. 424 3.

2560 763 z: 822 6.

1108 7. FOR THE UORKING CLASS

1880 0. DK

VAR 0193 REP 0193 NAflE-SOCRDT PTY-UNITED/SPLIT HD=GE 8

LOC 219 UIDTA 1 DK 4 COL 33

DATA SET ID-'7225'

<R'S RATING OF SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY. SEE REP. NO. 136> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

695 1. UNITED 623 2. 738 3.

1636 4. 665 5. 805 6.

1159 7. SPLIT

1872 8. DK


VAR 0194 REF 0194 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAKE-SOCRDT PTY-BAD/GOOD ED=GE 8


525 1. BAD 539 2. 795 3.

2241 4. 910 5. 642 6. 700 7. GOOD

1841 8. DK

VAR 0195

<R'S RATING OF SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

REP 0195 DATA SET ID-172251 NAHE-SOCRDT PTY-LEFT/RIGHT ED=GE 8


407 1. LEFT WING 456 2. 691 3.

2784 4. 667 5. 461 6. 665 7. RIGHT UYNG

2062 8. DK

<R'S RATING OF SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

VAR 0196 REP 0196 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAHE-SOCRDT PTY-STG/YEAK RIED ED=GE 8


<R'S RATING OF SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY. SEE REF. 80. 136> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

769 1. STRONG-EINDED 876 2.

1047 3.


(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .

1850 789 :: 542 6. 440 7. WEAK-IIRDED

1880 8. DK

VAR 0197 REP 0197 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-SOCRDT PTY-HONST/DHONEST KD=GE 8


<R'S RATING OF SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1394 1. AONEST 1279 2. 1065 3. 2080 4.

276 5. 142 6.

93 7. DISHONEST

1864 8. DK

VAR 0198 REP 0198 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-SOCRDT PTY-DULL/EXCITING ID=GE 8

LOC 224 SIIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 30

<R'S RATIUG OF SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..*.........................

679 1. DULL 710 2. 740 3.

2368 4. 898 5.

537 399 9: EXCITING

1862 8. DK


VAR 0199 REP 0199 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-SOCRDT PTY-YOUNG/OLD HD=GE 8

LOC 225 WIDTA 1 DK 4 COL 39

<R'S RATING OF SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A -

684 1. YOUNG 950 2. q II

1308 3. 2411 4.

549 5. 192 6. 235 7. OLD

1864 8. DK

VAR 0200 REP 0200 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAUE-SOCRDT PTY-SLOW/FAST ND=GE 0


<R'S RATXNG OF SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY. SEE REP. NO. 136) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

441 1. SLOY

513 888 :: 2863 4.

854 5. 429 6. 339 7. FAST

1866 8. DK

VAR 0201 REP 0201 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAKE-CRDTST PTY-OLD/RODERN IlD=GE 8

LOC 227 WIDTH 1 DK 4 cot 41

<R'S RATING OF CREDITISTE PARTY. SEE REF. 80. 136> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

911 1. OUT OF DATE 452 2. 485 3.


(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .

1476 4. 806 5. 743 6.

ll82 7. NODERN

2138 8. DK

VAR 0202 REP 0202 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-CRDTST PTY-CMPTN/INCUPTN fID=GE 8


<R'S RATING OF CREDITISTE PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. . . . . .

532 1. COHPETENT 377 2. 504 3.

1357 4. 752 5. 955 6.

1589 7. INCOIIPETENT

2127 8. DK

VAR 0203 REP 0203 NAClE-CRDTST PTY-POWERPUL/UEAK HD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

<R'S RATING OF CRBDITISTE PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

413 1. POWERFUL 294 2. 489 3.

1215 4. 755 5.

1155 6. 1725 7. WEAK

2147 8. DK


VAR 0204 REP 0204 NAHE-CRDTST PTY-FOOLISH/WISE HD=GE 8

LOC 230 WIDTE 1 DK 4 COL 44

PAGE 91

DATA SET ID-'7225'

<R'S RATING OF CREDITISTE PARTY, SEE REF. NO. 136> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..--..........-..-.-.--..-...-....-

1424 1. FOOLISH 1120 2.

847 3.

1462 413 2 370 6. 423 7. WISE

2134 8. DK

VAR 0205 REF 0205 NAME-CRDTST PTY-BID/WRKG CLS HD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'72251

<R'S RATING OF CREDITISTE PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136) . . ..-..............-...-...........................

285 1. FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS 247 2. 294 3.

2435 4. 470 5. 732 6.

1539 7. FOR TEE WORKING CLASS

2191 8. DK

VAR 0206 EEF 0206 NACIE-CRDTST PTY-f.INITED/SPLIT ID=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

643 443 397

<R'S RATING OF CREDITISTE PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-....

1. UNITED L. 3.


(CONTINUED)

1425 713 931

1443

2198

z: 6. 7. SPLIT

8. DK

VAR 0207 REP 0207 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CRDTST PTY-BAD/GOOD XD=GE 8


<R'S RATING OF CREDITISTE PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..--.1---....---.

1218 1. BAD 881 2. 829 3.

1773 4. 521 5. 362 475 ;: GOOD

2134 8. DK

V 'AR 0208 IEF 0208 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CRDTST PTY-LEFT/RIGBT HD=GE 8


<R'S EATING OF CRBDITISTE PARTY. SEE REP. NO. 136> . ..r...............-..--.......................-...

822 :: LEFT WING 569 573 3.

2485 4. 425 5. 455 6. 513 7. RIGBT YING

2351 8. DK


VAR 0209 REP 0209 NAHE-CRDTST PTY-STG/YEAK HIND KD=GE 8


PAGE 93

DATA SET ID-'7225'

1427 935 802

1280 423 531 660

<R'S EATING OF CREDITISTE PARTY. SEE EEF. NO. 136> . . ..-..............................................

1. STRONG-MINDED 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. YEAR-MINDED

2135 8. DK

VAR 0210 REF 0210 NAME-CRDTST PTY-HONST/DHONEST BD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-172251

<R'S RATING OF CREDITISTE PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-................................

1014 1. HONEST 892 771 32:

2242 4. 556 5. 305 6. 245 7. DISHONEST

2168 8. DK

VAR 0211 REP 0211 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAKE-CRDTST PTY-DULL/EXCITING KD=GE 8

LOC 237 WIDTR 1 DK 4 COL 51

<R'S RATING OF CREDITISTE PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136) ..--.l..l.l..r........-....--.-.--....--.-...,.....

762 1, DULL 481 2. 529 3.


(CONTINUED) -..---...I.

1714 4,

862 686 t : 991 7. EXCITING

2168 8. DK

VAR 0212 REP 0212 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAKE-CRDTST PTY-YOUNG/OLD KD=GE 8


<R'S RATING OF CREDITISTE PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136> ..,.............--.-.-..*............-.-.....-.-..-

1076 l- YOUNG 963 2.

1117 3.

2211 321 ;: 161 6. 165 7. OLD

2179 8. DK

VAR 0213 REP 0213 NANE-CRDTST PTY-SLOW/FAST KD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

<R'S RATING OF CREDITISTE PABTY. SEE REF. NO. 136) ..-.1-...-.-.......................................

456 1. SLOW 467 2. 438 3.

2304 4. 881 5. 740 6. 742 7. FAST

2165 8. DK


VAR 0214 REF 0214 NAHE-LIBERAL flP-JOB PERFRHNCE ND=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 31. WE'VE TALKED ABOUT TEE PARTIES. I'D ALSO LIKE YOUR OPINIONS OF THE HEBBERS OF PARLIABENT WHICH EACB OF THE PARTIES HAVE SENT TO OTTAWA IN THE LAST FEW YEARS. YOU HAY NOT KNOW TOO HUCH ABOUT THEM, BUT JUST GIVE HE YOUR GENERAL IBPRESSION OF THE JOB 'PREY HAVE BEEN DOING.

A. LET'S START WITH THE LIBERAL BEKBERS OF PARLIANENT. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE JOB TBEY HAVE BEEN DOING-PRETTY GOOD, JUST SO-SO, OR NOT GOOD AT ALL? . . . . . . . . . . ..~.~...~1...~..~.....~..~~..................~....

2848 1. PRETTY GOOD 4208 2. so-so

776 3. NOT GOOD

330 8. DK 31 9. HA

VAR 0215 REP 0215 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CNSVTV HP-JOB PERFRKANCE KD=GE 8


Q. 31-B. BOW ABOUT THE CONSERVATIVE HEHBERS OF PARLIABENT? HOW HAVE THEY BEEN PRETTY GOOD, SO-SO, OR NOT GOOD AT ALL? <R'S RATING OF THE JOB CONSERVATIVE EP'S HAVE BEEN DOING> <SEE REF. NO. 214> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..s.wm... .-.-......-.1.................-

2277 1. PRETTY GOOD 4154 2. so-so 1253 3. NOT GOOD

465 8. DK 44 9. NA


VAR 0216 REP 0216 NAHE-NDP PIP-JOB PERPORBANCE I'lD=GE 8


PAGE 96

DATA SET ID-'72251

Q- 31-C. WHAT ABOUT TEE NDP EEHBERS OF PAELIAKENT? AOU WOULD YOU RATE THEM? <R'S RATING OF THE JOB NDP tip's BAVE BEEN DOING> <SEE REF. ~0. 214) r......-.-....-..........................................

2373 1, PRETTY GOOD 2687 2. so-so 1165 3. NOT GOOD

1923 8. DK 45 9. NA

VAR 0217 REP 0217 NAME-SOCRDT HP-JOB PERFRIANCE BD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 31-D. AND BOW ABOUT THE SOCIAL CREDIT HEHBEBS OF PARLIAMENT FOLLOWING BR. TEIOEPSON? <E'S RATING OF TEE JOB SOCIAL CREDIT EP'S FOLLOUING TAOHPSON HAVE BEEN DOING> <SEE REF. NO. 21U> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-....---.-.---..--...-.-.-----..

1228 1, PRETTY GOOD 2563 2. so-so 1947 3. NOT GOOD

2421 8. DK 34 9. NA

VAR 0218 REP 0218 NABE-CRDTST NP-JOB PERFBHANCE ED=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 31-E. AND FINALLY, RHAT ABOUT TAE CAOUETTE GROUP OF SOCIAL CREDIT BEEBEES OF PARLIAEENT? <R'S EATING OF THE JOB I'IEBBEES OF THE CAOUETTE GROUP HAVE BEEN DOING> <SEE REF. NO. 214> . . . . . . ..*.................--.--...--.-.-.--.-....-..*.-

732 1. PRETTY GOOD


(CONTINUED) . ..-....I..

1764 2. so-so 2936 3. NOT GOOD

2721 8. DK 40 9. NA

VAR 0219 REF 0219 HAKE-XCUPR CRDTST PTY TO OTRS ID=0 OR GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

ASK QUESTIONS 32 AND 33 <REF. NOS. 219-220) IN QUEBEC. FOR ALL OTBERS GO TO Q. 34 <REF. NO. 221>

Q. 32. (QUEBEC OULY) NOU I’H 6OING TO ASK YOU TUO QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY LED BY LIB- CAOUETTE. DO YOU PERSONALLY FEEL THAT, IN TBE LAST FEW YEARS, ON THE UBOLE, THE SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY III OTTABA HAS DONE A BUCB BETTER JOB, A SOKEYHAT BETTER JOB, ABOUT THE SAKE, A SOBEUHAT WORSE JOB, OR A BUCH ROUSE JOB TBAN TBE OTBEB PABTIBS? . . . ..-......-.-.1.......................................-...

246 1. HUCB BETTER 384 2. SOHEIHAT BETTER 807 3. ABOUT TEE SAKE 414 4. SOKEYHAT BORSE 258 5. MUCH UORSE

282 8. DK 9. IA

5802 0. INAP (R IS BOT A QUEBEC RESIDENT)

VAR 0220 REP 0220 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAHE-XCRDTST COME PWR-10 IRS AID=0 OR GE 8

LOC 246 WIDTB 1 DK 4 COL 60

Q. 33. (QUEBEC ONLY) WHAT CBAPCES DO YOU TPIBK THE SOCIAL CREDIT PAMY HAS TO BECOZIE THE PARTY II POBBR IN OTTAYA II TIE NEXT TEN YEARS: A VERY GOOD CIIAUCE, FAIELY GOOD CHAIICE, WOT TOO UUCA OF A CEAUCE 0% EO CLANCC AT ALL? .11.....--.-......_.....-......-. '................,.........

69 1. VERY GOOD 330 2. FAIRLY GOOD 717 3. UOT TOO MUCH CBAWCE


1119

156

580.2

4. NO CHANCE

8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP (R IS NOT A QUEBEC RESIDENT)

VAR 0221 REP 0221 NAME-R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION BD=GE 98

LOC 247 WIDTH 2 DK 4 cOL 61-62

DATA SET ID-172251

2045 10. CONSERVATIVE 3043 20. LIBERAL

883 30. NDP 344 40. SOCIAL CREDIT 144 50. CREDITISTE

42 60. UNIOK NATIONALE 16 70. OTHER PARTY

1381 80. NO PARTY

238 98. DK 57 99. NA

Q. 34. (EVERYONE) GEWERALLY SPEAKIRG, DO YOU USUALLY THINK OF YOURSELF AS CONSERVATIYE, LIBERAL, SOCIAL CREDIT, CREDITISTE, NDP, UNION NATIONALE OR WHAT? . . . . ..-.............-..-..............*.....-...........-.-

IF SOHE PARTY IDENTIFICATION CHOSEN, ASK QUESTIONS 35, 36, 37 <REF. NOS. 222-226, 233-234>. IF NO PARTY IDENTIFICATION, ASK QUESTLON 38 <REP. NOS. 227-234>.

VAR 0222 NAflE-XSTRENGTE-R'S

LOC 249 YIDTH

REP 0222 DATA SET ID-'7225' PARTY ID ID=0 OR GE 8

1 DK 4 COL 63

Q. 35. (FOR IDENTIFIERS) EOU STRONGLY (NAHE OF CEOSEN PARTY) DO YOU GENERALLY FEEL-VERY STEONGLY, FAIRLY STRONGLY, OR NOT VERY STRONGLY? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.-....-.................-...--....--......

1887 1. VERY STRONGLY 3386 2. FAIRLY STRONGLY 1211 3. NOT VERY STRONGLY


31 59

1619

(CONTINUED) . ..-.1..-..

DK 9": WA 0. INAP (R CODED 80 OR 98 IN REF. NO. 221)

VAR 0223 REF 0223 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAflE-XR'S PAST PARTY ID BD=GE 91

LOC 250 WIDTti 2 DK 4 COL .64-65

3977 00. NO, NEVER FELT CLOSER

955 10. YES, CONSERVATIVE 850 20. YES, LIBERAL 354 30. YES, NDP 108 40. YES, SOCIAL CREDIT

21 50. YES, CREDITISTE 111 80. YES, OTHER

1619 91. INAP (R CODED 0 IN REF. NO. 222) 125 98. DK 73 99. NA

Q. 36-A. (FOR IDENTIFIERS) UAS THERE EVER A TIBE UHEN YOD THOUGHT OF YOURSELF AS CLOSEST TO ANY OTRER PARTY IN CANADA? 36-e. (IF "YES“) UHICE PARTY HAS THAT? . . . . . . . ..-........-....................-....................

VAR 0224 REP 0224 NAtlE-XLEVEL PTY ID-NATYJFVRCL HD-0 OX GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 37-A. (FOR IDENTIFIERS) UAEN YOU SAT YOU ARE A (NAME OF CAOSEN PARTY) ARE YOU THINKING OF NATIONAL POLITICS, POLITICS HERE IN TXIS PROVINCE, OR BOTH? . . . ..-..--........-+.......................................

1371 1. NATIONAL ORLY 380 2. PROVINCIAL ONLY

4707 3. BOTH

63 8. DK 53 NA

1619 INAP (R CODED 0 IN REF. NO. 222)


VAR 0225 REP 0225 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-XPVNCL PTY ID-NATL LVL 1 HD=GE 91


--FOR IDENTIFIERS-- Q. 37-B. (IF NATIONAL ONLY) HELL, BOY ABOUT POLITICS BERE IN (NABE OF PROVINCE)? HO1 DO YOU THINK OF YOURSELF? . ..-...........-.....--..-....*.-.--............--..-...-.

325 401

2:: 6

54 6

117

::: 30. 40. 50.

E: 80.

CONSERVATIVE LIBERAL NDP SOCIAL CREDIT CREDITXSTE UNIOU NATIONALE OTHER NONE

6769 91. INAP (R CODED 2, 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 224) 70 90. DK

108 99. NA

VAR 0226 REF 0226 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAIIE-XNATL PTY ID-PVNCL LVL 1 BD=GE 91


--FOR IDENTIPIERS-- Q. 37-C. (IF PROVINCIAL ONLY) YELL, ROU ABOUT NATIONAL POLITICS? BOY DO YOU THINK OF YOURSELF? . . . . . . . . ..--..-........................................

107 145

36 15

21

10. CONSERVATIVE 20. LIBERAL 30. NDP 40. SOCIAL CREDIT 50. CBEDITISTE 60. UNION NATIOBALE 80. NONE

7760 91. INAP (R CODED 1, 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 224) 46 98. DK 63 99. WA


VA8 0227 REF 0227 NAME-NN.ID-CLOSER TO RCH PTY BD=GE 91


DATA SET ID-'7225'

865 00. NO, DO NOT FEEL CLOSER

201 10. YES, CONSERVATIVE 293 20. YES. LIBERAL 103 30. XES, NDP

18 40. YES, SOCIAL CREDIT 27 80. YES, OTHER

6517

6 119

44

91. INAP, (R CODED 10. 20. 30, 40, 50, 60, OR 70 IN REF. NO. 221)

97. REFUSED 98. DK 99. NA

Q. 38-A.. (FOR NON-IDENTIFIERS) YELL, DO YOU GENERALLY THINK OF YOURSELF AS A LXTTLE CLOSER TO ONE OF THE PARTIES THAN THE OTAERS? Q. 38-B. (IF "YES") UAICH PARTY IS THAT? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

VAR 0228 REP 0228 NABE-XNN.ID-PTY CHOICE NAT/PV ID=0 OR GE 8

LOC 259 UIDTB 1 DK 4 COL 73

DATA SET ID-'7225'

--FOR NON-IDENTIFIERS EHO LEAN-- Q. 38-C. WHEN YOU SAY YOU FEEL CLOSER TO (PARTY BENTIONED) ARE YOU TEINKING OF NATIONAL POLITICS, POLITICS HERE IN THE PROVINCES OR BOTH? . . . . . . . . . ..1...1..~.~.....~..............~.~..~.....~.......

208 65

362

:‘8 7507

1. NATIONAL ONLY 2. PROVIBCIAL ONLY 3. BOTH

DK 9”: NA 0. INAP (E CODED 00, 91, 97, OR 90 IN REP-NO. 227)


VAR 0229 REP 0229 NAflE-XNN.ID,PV LVL-NATL LVL 1 BD=GE 91


DATA SET ID-'7225'

--FOR NON-IDENTIFIERS YHO LEAN-- Q. 38-D. (IF NATIONAL ONLY) NELL HO1 ABOUT POLITICS HERE IN (PROVINCE) TO WHICH PARTY DO YOU GENERALLY FEEL CLOSER? -.-...............-....-.--........-......-.-.......--.*....

35 73 16 27

3

10. CONSERVATIVE 20. LIBERAL 30. NDP 40. SOCIAL CREDIT 50. CREDITISTE 60. UNION NATIONALE 70. OTHER

7947 91. INAP (E CODED 2, 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 228) 16 98. DK 76 99. NA

VAR 0230 REF 0230 NAME-XNN.ID,NATL LVL-PV LVL 1 MD=GE 91

LOC 262 WIDTH 2 DK 4 CDL 76-77

DATA SET ID-'7225'

--FOR NON-IDENTIFIERS UHO LEAN-- Q. 38-E. (IF PROVINCIAL ONLY) HOW ABOUT NATIONAL POLITICS? TO WHICH PARTY DO YOU GENERALLY FEEL CLOSER? . . . . ..-.-..-...-.......-.........-......-..-...-...........

3 23

3

8090 26 48

10. CONSERVATIVE ii: LIBERAL

NDP 40. SOCIAL CREDIT 50. CBEDITISTE 70. OTHER

91. INAP (R CODED 1, 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 228.) 98. DK 99. NA


VAR 0231 REP 0231 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAME-XNN.ID-PST PTY CHOICE/ID ID=GE 91


331

143 75 30 19 12

7507 29 47

--FOR NON-IDENTIPIEBS UHO LEAN-- Q. 38-P. UAS THERE EVER A TIHE WHEN YOU FELT CLOSER TO AEY OTHER PARTY? Q. 38-G. (IF "YES") WHICH PARTY WAS THAT? . ..-_.....__1._*._...-.......-....--...--...-....-.-.

00. NO, NEVER FELT CLOSER

10. CONSERVATIVE 20. LIBERAL 30. NDP

2: SOCIAL CREDIT OTHER

91. INAP (R CODED 00, 91, 97, OR 98 IN REP.NO.227) 90. DK 99. NA

VAR 0001 REP 0001 DATA SET ID-'72251 NANE-ICPR STUDY NUNBER-7225 NO HISSING DATA CODES

LOC 1 YIDTH 4 DK 5 COL l- 4

STUDY NUI'lEiER (7225) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

VAR 0002 REP 0002 DATA SET ID-'7225' NANE-INTERVIEW NUHBER NO NISSING DATA CODES

LOC 5 UIDTH 5 DK 5 COL 5- 9

RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NURBER

THE FIRST DIGIT IDELlTIPIES THE PROVINCE AS CODED IN VARIABLE FIVE; THE NEXT POUR DIGITS ARE THE RESPONDENT'S IDENTI?ICATION NUMBER YITHIN THE PROVINCE. ALL FIVE DIGITS ARE NEEDED TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY A RESPONDENT. . . . . . . . ..-.--.-...-.--------....-..-.-...-..-......*...*-*-.


VAR 0003 REP 0003 DATA SET I~-'72251 NABE-INTEGER UEIGHT VARIABLE NO EISSING DATA CODES

LOC 10 YIDTH 1 DK 5COLlO

INTEGER UEIGHT VALUES

RESPONDENTS WERE WEIGHTED ACCORDING TO TEEIR CONSTITUENCY OF RESIDENCE. ALL SUBJECTS LIVING IN CONSTITUENCY t049 (ALGOBA WEST, ONTARIO) TREOUGH 11080 (WENTWORTH, ONTARIO) RERE HEIGHTED BY A FACTOR OF OWE AND ONE-THIRD. RESIDENTS OF t040 (CARTIER, QUEBEC) THRU #DUB (SAINT-JACQUES, QUEBEC) (IWCLUSIVE), 1081 (YORK CENTRE, ONTARIO) THRU 1088 (ROSEDALE, ONTARIO), AND ALL RESPONDENTS FROB BRITISH COLUBBIA WERE DOUBLE WEIGHTED. THE REST OF THE CONSTITUENCIES ARE ONWEIGHTED. SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 4 AND 6.

THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNYEIGHTED (RAW) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DATA CASES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-...-.....--.....--...............-...---.

1113 3. UNYEIGHTED CASES 588 4. YEIGBTXD ONE AND OWE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES #049-t080) 417 6. DOUBLE WEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES 1040-1048, #081-

1088, AND #Ill-tll8)

VAR 0004 REP 0004 DATA SET YD-'7225' HARE-DECIRAL WEIGHT VAIIIABLE 10 UISSING DATA CODES

LOC 11 YIDTE 3 DK 5 COL 11-13 2 DEC PLACE(S)

DECIlAl. YEIGHT VALUES PLEASE SEE ALSO REF. EOS. 3 AND 6.

THE ?REQUERCYES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT ONWEIGHTED (RAW) IPEQDEBCIES ?OR THE ACTUAL NUBBEX OF DATl CASES.

<TWO DECIEAL PLACES ARE INPLIED> I_-...................----...-----...................--..-

1113 100. UMYEIGliTBD CASES 588 133. YLIGBTED ONE AND Ollt-THIRD (COISTITUERCIES

ra49-#oeo) 417 200. DOUBLE IEIGETED (COESTITUENCIES 1040-1048,

t081-1088, A1D #ill-tll6)


'5' I..

VAR 0232 REP 0232 NAEE-XTRUE NN.ID-EVER CLS PTY MD=0 OR GE 8


DK 5COL14

DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 38-5. (IF DOESN'T FEEL CLOSE IN Q. 38-A <REF. NO. 227)) (FOR NON LEANERS) WAS THERE EVER A TINE WHEN YOU DID THINK OF YOURSELF AS CLOSER TO ONE OF THE PARTIES? _...._............_.....-.-....-.------.--*....-...........

263 1. YES 657 2. NO

79 8. DK 35 9. NA

7159 0. INAP (R CODED lo-80 OR 91 IN REP-NO. 227)

VAR 0233 REP 0233 DATA SET ID-172251 NAME-XHHEN R'S PTY ID CHANGED BD=GE 91


QNS. 36-C, 38-H, AND 38-K (EACH RESPONDENT ANSRERED ONLY ONE OF THESE)

Q. 36-C. (IF "YES" IN REF. NO. 223) UHEN DID YOU CHANGE FROH THAT PARTY TO YOUR PRESENT ONE?

Q. 38-R. (IF "YES" IN REP. NO. 231) UHEN DID YOU CHANGE FROB FEELING CLOSER TO TRAT PARTY?

Q. 38-K. (IF "YES" IN REP. NO. 232) WHEN DID YOU ROVE AUAY FROE THAT PARTY? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-......................-....-..-........

359 90

361 508 301 227

71 238

01. 02.

03. 04. 05.

0";: 08.

DURING THE LAST FEDERAL CAEPAIGN LESS THAN 1 YEAR BEFORE (INTERVIEW) BUT BEFORE LAST CAMPAIGN. 1 OR 2 YRS. BEFORE (12 HONTES-35 HONTHS) 3-5 YRS. BBFORE (36 BONTRS-71 MONTHS) 6-9 YRS BEFORB (72 EONTHS-119 CIONTHS) lo-1U IRS. 15-20 YES. 20 IRS. PLUS

5198 91. INAP (R DID NOT SUITCE PARTIES, I.E. CODED 00 OE 98


IN REP. NO. 223, OR 00 OR 98 IN REF. NO. 231, OR 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 232)

840 99. NO ANSWER, CAN’T REUEBBEA, UNCLEAR

VAR 0234 REP 0234 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAHE-XREASON R CRANGD PTY ID BD=GE 91

LOC 269 WIDTA 2 DK 5 COL 18-19

394 322 445

11. PARTY LEADER OR LEADERS. 12. CANDIDATE. 13. PARTY (DISSATISFIED WITA FORBEELY FAVOURED PARTY OR

ATTRACTED BY OTAEB PARTY) BEW OR OLD. 337 14. GENERAL PLATPORR AND PROGRAB OF PARTY OR CANDIDATE.

SPECIFIC ISSUES

42 19

445 9

165 70

15. HAJORITY. 16. LACK OF LEADERSHIP. 17. OTBBRS. 18. LACK OF STABILITY. 19. NEEDED CHANGE IN GOVERNBENT. 20. SWITCHED ALLEGIANCE BECAUSE HE FELT HIS PARTY HAD

NO CBANCE. 155

63 33

5198

496

21. OTHER NON-POLITICAL REASONS, X-G, INFLUENCE OF ANOTHER PERSON OB GEOGRAPHICAL AREA.

22. UNKEPT PROMISES. 23. UNEBPLOYBENT.

91. INAP. (CODED 91 IN REF. NO. 233) 98. IRRELEVANT ANSWERS, DON'T KNOW, REFUSE. 99. NO ANSWER OR NOT APPLICABLE.

QNS. 36-D, 38-1, AND 38-L. (EACH RESPONDENT ANSWERED ONLY ONE OF THESE QUESTIONS.)

Q. 36-D. (IF "YES" IN REP. NO. 223) WHAT WAS THE MAIN THING THAT UADE YOU CHANGE?

Q. 38-I. (IF "YES" IN REP. NO. 231) WAAT WAS THE MAIN THING THAT MADE YOU CHANGE?

Q. 38-L. (IF "YES" IN REP. NO. 232) WHAT WAS THE MAIN THING THAT BADE YOU HOVE AWAY PROM TRE PARTY? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.....-.......................


VAR 0235 REP 0235 DATA SET ID-'72251 ABBE-SECOND CHOICE FDRL PTY flD=GE 8


1074

1730 1666 1721

616 151

34

0. NO SECOND CHOICE

1. CONSERVATIVE 2. LIBERAL 3. NDP 4. SOCIAL CREDIT

2 CREDITISTE OTHER

1152 8. DK 49 9. NA

VAR 0236 REP 0236

Q. 39. (EVERYBODY) IF AT THIS TIHE YOU HAD TO VOTE FOR ONE OF THE OTHER FEDERAL PARTIES, WHICH ONE WOULD BE YOUR SECOND CHOICE? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..--...1..-........-.-...--..-.--...........

NABE-LAST CHOICE FEDERAL PTY BD=GE 7 LOC 272 YIDTR 1 DK 5COL21

DATA SET ID-'72251

Q. 40. WHICR OF TBE FEDERAL PARTXES TODAY WOULD YOO LEAST WANT TO VOTE POR? ..-.-............._.........*........*.........---.-.-*.*.

792 1. CONSERVATIVE 565 2. LIBERAL 952 3. NDP

1229 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 2948 5. CREDITISTE

160 6. OTR ER

6 7. REFUSED 1504 8. DK

37 9. WA


VAR 0237 REP 0237 NAME-WCH NOST IMP VT:LDR,PTY ED=GE 80


PAGE 108

DATA SET ID-'72251

Q. 41. ON THE WHOLE, WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS NOST IMPORTANT TO YOU WHEN YOU VOTE? THE CANDIDATE RUNNING IN YOUR RIDING, TEE PIETY ITSELF, OR THE PARTY'S LEADER? <GEONETRIC CODE> . . . . . . . . . ..-....._.1......-..............--.-...- -.a.....

2349 01. PARTY 1652 02. LEADER

422 03. PARTY AND LEADER EQUALLY 2458 04. CANDIDATE

267 05. PARTY AND CANDIDATE 204 06. LEADER AND CANDIDATE 196 08. PROGRAU 130 09. PARTY AND PROGRACI EQUALLY 194 10. LEADER AND PROGRAH EQUALLY 156 12. CANDIDATE AND PROGRAN

4 80. OTHER CONBINATIONS 161 98. DK

VAR 0238 REP 0238 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAIE-VOTE UN BAD CAND,GD PTY MD=GE 0


Q. 42. SUPPOSE THERE WAS AN ELECTION IN WHICH THE PARTY YOU FAVOUR RAN A CANDIDATE IN YOUR RIDING WHOM YOU DID NOT LIKE OR DID NOT AGREE WITH PHAT WOULD YOU BE HOST LIKELY TO DO? VOTE FOR THE CANDIDATE ANYWAY? OR NOULD YOU PROBABLY NOT VOTE AT ALL? . . . . . . . . . . . ..--......--....................-........-.-.--..

3243 1. CANDIDATE 2726 2. OTHER PARTY 1527 3. WON'T VOTE

667 8. DK 30 9. RI


VAR 0239 REP 0239 NAME-VOTE UN BAD PLCY,GD PTY BD=GE 8


PAGE 109

DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q- 43. SUPPOSE THERE WAS AN ELECTION IN WAICH THE PARTY YOU PREFER WAS IN FAVOUR OF SOME POLICY YOU DID NOT LIKE OR DID NOT AGREE WITH. WAAT WOULD YOU BE KOST LIKELY TO DO? VOTE FOR THE PARTY'S CANDIDATE ANYWAY? CONSIDER ANOTHER PARTY'S CANDIDATE? OR WOULD YOU PROBABLY NOT VOTE? . . . . . . . . . . . ..-..-.1--.--.-............-....-..--........-.-.

2111 1. CANDIDATE 3015 2, OTHER PARTY 1343 3. WON'T VOTE 1041 4. IT DEPENDS, QUALIFIED

654 8. DK 29 9. NA

VAR 0240 REP 0240 NAME-FATHER'S INTST IN POLT BD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

3176 1. VERY INTERESTED 2849 2. SOBEWHAT INTERESTED 1558 3. DID NOT PAY EUCB ATTENTION

213 4. DID NOT LIVE UITH FATHER

390 8, DK 7 9. WA

Q. 44. DO YOU REREBBER, WHEN YOU WERE GROWING, UP, WHETHER YOUR FATHER WAS VERY OUCH INTERESTED IN POLITICS, SONEWHAT INTERESTED, OR DIDN'T HE PAY BUCH ATTENTION TO IT? ..11....................--.-.-.-.-........--.-.....-.-...-.

VAR 0241 REP 0241 NABE-FATHER'S PTY PREFERENCE lD=GE 60


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 45-A. DID YOUR FATEEL? HAVE ANY PARTICULAR PREFERENCE FOR OUE OF THE PEDEEAL POLITICAL PARTIES WHEN YOU WERE YOUUG? Q- 45-B. (IF "YES") WHICH PARTY WAS THAT? . . . ..I.................-..-.-.--.-.......-...-...-.-.--...~.


(CONTINUED) -.-*...1*..

2093 00. NO PREFERENCE


267 30. CCP 88 40. SOCIAL CREDIT

43 60. OTHER 405 80, NOT CANADIAN PARTY

213 91. INAP (R CODED 4 IN REF. NO. 240) 320 98. DK 147 99. HA

VAR 0242 REF 0242 NAHE-KOTHER'S INTST IN POLT tlD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'72251

Q. 46. UHEN YOU WERE GROWING UP, WAS YOUR EOTHER VERY EUCH INTERESTED IN POLITICS, SOBEWHAT INTERESTED, OR DIDN'T SHE PAY BUCH ATTENTION TO IT? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..--........*..........................

1161 1. VERY INTERESTED 2447 2. SOMEWHAT IETERESTED 3872 3. DXD NOT PAY UUCH ATTENTION

267 4. DID NOT LIVE WITH EOTXBR

446 8. DK 9. NA

VAR 0243 REP 0243 NAHE-HOTHER'S PTY PREFERENCE HD=GE 60


DATA SET ID-'72251

Q. 47-A. WHEN YOU WERE YOUNG, DID YOUR MOTHER HAVE ANY PREFERENCE FOE ORE OF THE FEDERAL POLITICAL PARTIES? Q- 47-B. (IF "YES") UHICH PARTY HAS THAT? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-........

3525 00. NO PREFERENCE

1539 10. CONSERVATIVE


(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . I . . .

20. 30. 40.

LIBERAL CCF SOCIAL CREDIT

1956 198

67

9 60. 262 80.

267 189 181

E: 99.

VAR 0244 REP 0244

OTHER NOT CANADIAN PARTY

SNAP (R CODED 4 IN REF. NO. 242) DK NA

NAHE-RHBR NAHE ELECTED CAND ID=9 LOC 283 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 32

DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 48. DO YOU HAPPEN TO YtEHEKBER.THE NAIYE OF THE CANDZDATE WHO PAS ELECTED TO PAELXAEERT FOR TNIS RIDING IN THE NOVEBBER ~TR, ELECTION? . ..-......-...1..-1.---.....-.....--..*.-.......-......~...

6153 YES, CORRECT 194 :: YES, INCORRECT

1443 3. NO, DO NOT REBEKBEE 394 4. NOT SURE

9 9. NA

VAR 0245 REP 0245 NAEE-RBBR PARTY ELECTED CAUD nD=9


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 49. DO YOU HAPPEN TO KNOW HIS (HER) <ELECTED BP> PARTY? _.....___.-_...1....--.--.----..-...-.--.---.....-.*....---

6947 1. YES, CORRECT 188 2. YES, INCORRECT 802 3. NO, DO NOT KNOR 248 4. NOT SURE

8 9. NA


VAR 0246 REP 0246 NAHE-READ/HEARD ABOUT CAND BD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'72251

Q. 50-A. (IF R GAVE IUCOERECT ANSKEES OR DID NOT KNOW, NAHE AND PARTY READ BY INTERVIEUER) HAVE YOU EVER READ OR HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT BIH (HER) <ELECTED BP>? -......................-.-...--.--...-....-......-....-..

4793 1. YES 2689 2. NOT BEARD ANYTHING

694 3. NOT SURE

8. DK 17 9. WA

VAR 0247 REP 0247 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAME-XTYPE OF INFO R/H ABT EP BD=O OR GE 9


Q. 50-B. WHAT UAS TBAT <B READ OR BEARD ABOUT ELECTED HP>? . ..-..........r....-....-..-..-...............-...-...--.-.

(ANSWERS TO THIS QUESTION ARE CODED ACCORDING TO WBETHER OR NOT TBE RESPONDENT IS ABLE TO BACK UP BIS CLAXH IN 50-A. ANSYERS WERE AIBED AT TEE SOURCE OF INPORBATION OR THE CONTENT. ALL SOURCE ORIENTED RESPONSES WERE CODED 1 (PANPBLETS, NEWSPAPER ARTICLES, T.V., ETC.). ALL CONTENT ANSWERS UEBE EVALUATED ACCORDING TO THE CODING SCBEBE. IN CASES OF DOUBT THE RESPONDENT HAS ALUAYS GIVEN THE BENEFIT OF A 1 CODE.)

3838 U27

518

10 3400

1. BENTIONS SOBETBING SPECIFIC. 2. GIVES VAGUE GENERAL ANSUER.

8. CAN NOT REBEHBER, REFUSES

9. NA 0. QUESTION IS MOT APPLICABLE (R CODED 2, 3, 8, OR 9 IE

REF. NO. 246)


VAR 0248 REP 0248 NARE-WAS CANDIDATE INCUMBENT tiD=9


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 51-A. DO YOU HAPPEN TO KNOW YHETHER RE (SBE) WAS ALREADY IN PARLIABENT JUST BEFORE THIS ELECTION? . . ..-_...1____...._._---.------.--...-----.----..--...........-....

lr998 1. IN PARLIABENT, CORRECT 271 2. IN PARLIABENT, INCOBEECT

1468 3. NOT IN PARLIABENT, COREECT 197 4. NOT IN PARLIABENT, INCORRECT

6 5. OTHER

1253 8. DK

9. NA

VAR 0249 BEF 0249 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAHE-XCAND AIDED CONSTITUENCY ID=0 OR GE 8

LOC 288 RIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 37

Q. 51-B. (IF IN PARLIAHENT, CORRECT) DO YOU REBEBBER ANYTHING THAT (NAME OF BENBER) HAS DONE FOR TAE PEOPLE OF THIS CONSTITUENCY? ..-.........1........-.--....---.-.--.-.-..-.--..-.....-.

1272 1. YES 966 2. DID NOTHING

2746 8. DK 14 9. HA

3195 0. INAP. (R CODED 2-8 IN REP, NO. 248)

VAR 0250 REF 0250 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-XCAND AIDED R/R'S PAHILY BD=O OR GE 8


Q. 51-D. HAS HE (SHE) EVER DONE ANYTHING FOR YOU OR YOUR FAMILY PERSONALLY? . ..-...................-.................-......-..-..-.-

193 1. YES 4758 2. DONE NOTHING


(CONTINUED) . . ..I. * . . . .

8. DK 47 9. NA

3195 0. INAP (R CODED 2-8 IN REF. NO. 248)

VAB 0251 REP 0251 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAKE-OTHER DIST CANDS--NAilE KD=O OR GE 9 BULT RESPS 4


FOR EACH NABE ELICITED BY Q. 52-A (REP-NO, 251). THE RESPOND- ENT WAS ASKED QS. 52-B AND 52-C (REPsNOSe 252-253). CORBENTS ABOUT THE FIRST INDIVIDUAL BENTIONED ARE ALWAYS CODED AS THE FIRST RESPONSE IN EACH OF THESE THREE VARIABLES (REF. NOS. 251-253) m CORMENTS ABOUT THE SECOND INDIVIDUAL ARE CODED IN THE SECOND RESPONSE, ETC.

Q- 52-A. DO YOU REBEBBER THE NABES OF ANY OTHER CANDIDATES RUNNING FOR ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 8TH PBOR THIS RIDING? . . . . . . ..-.--..._.1_._.--.----..-.-....*........................

1. CORRECT 2. INCORRECT 4. DK NAME BUT KNOWS THR PARTY 8. DK

NA INAP (NO FURTHER

THE FREQUENCIES FOR REP.

RESP # CODES--> (1) 1 4738 2 2296 3 442 4 91

RESPONSE)

NO. 251 FOLLOP

(2) (4)

Bf BESPOUSE:

(8) (9) (0) 439 203 2813 173 231 3 5490

70 88 7593 11 9 8082

VAR 0252 RXF 0252 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-OTHER DIST CAKDS--PARTY ID=0 OR GE 9 BULT RESPS 4


Q. 52-B. UHAT IS HIS (HER) PANTY <OF OTBEB UNSUCCESSFUL CANDIDATES FRO11 R'S RIDIRG>? . . . . . . . . . . . . ..__....---...........-.....................


(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .

1. CORRECT 2. INCORRECT 4. DK PARTY BUT KNORS WARE 8. DL

9. NA 0. INAP (NO FURTHER RESPONSE)

THE FREQUENCIES FOR REF. NO. 252 FOLLOY BY RESPONSE:

RESP t CODES--> (1) (2) (4) (8) (9) (0) 1 4869 414 100 2810 2 2403 222 75 3 5490 3 474 114 12 7593 4 91 20 8082

VAR 0253 EEF 0253 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-OTHER DIST CANDS--RD/BRD ID=0 OR GE 8 MULT RESPS 0


Q- 52-C. HAVE YOU BEAD OR HEARD AIYTEIXG ABOUT HII (HER) <I.E., OTHER UNSUCCESSFUL CANDIDATES FRO1 R'S RIDING>? *--..............--.............................-..-..-..

1. YES 2. NO 3. ROT SURE

8. DA 9. IA 0, INAP (NO FURTRER RESPOXSE)

THE FREQUGNCIES FOR REF. NO. 253 FOLLOH BY BESPOBSE:

RESP t CODES--> (1) (2) (3) (8) (0) 1 3737 1283 370 2797 2 1585 794 324 5690 3 313 210 77 7593 4 53 43 15 nolJ2


VAR 0254 REP 0254 NARE-RGLR VTR IN FDRL ELCTN BD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 53. IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS SINCE YOU HAVE BEEN OLD ENOUGH TO VOTE IN CANADA, WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU HAVE VOTED IN ALL OF THEB, MOST OF TBEB, SOBE OF THEM, OR NONE OF THEH? -1.......-.........-...-.....-.-.-.....--..........-.-*-...

4550 1. VOTED IN ALL 2292 2. VOTED IN BOST 1072 3. VOTED IN SOHE

251 4. VOTED IN NONE

21 8. DK 7 9. WA

VAR 0255 REP 0255 NAUE-XFDRL ELCTN-VT SAKE PTY? ID=0 OR GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

IF RESPONDENT HAS EVER VOTED IN A FEDERAL ELECTION-ASK Q. 54-A <REF. NO. 255>. FOR ALL OTHERS, GO TO Q. 55 <REP, NO. 257>.

Q- 58-A. (FOR THOSE 180 HAVE VOTED IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS) RAVE YOU ALWAYS VOTED FOR THE SAME PARTY, OR HAVE YOU VOTED FOR DIPPEREAT PARTIES? . . . ..-...................-....-..........................*.

3626 4262

33 272

1. VOTED FOR SAUE PARTY 2. VOTED FOR DIFFERENT PARTIES

8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP, (B CODED 4 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 254)

VAR 0256 REP 0256 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAKE-XFDRL ELCN-VT UCH SK PTY ID=0 OR GE 7


Q. 54-B. (IF SAME PARTY) RRICH PARTY IS THAT <R HAS ALWAYS VOTED FOR IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS>? . ..-..1-1..-1..........-...............*-.....-.........-*.


VAR

VAR

(CONTINUED) . . . . . . ..I..

1169 1915

279 105 29

16

113 4567

1. CONSERVATIVE 2. LIBERAL 3. NDP 2 SOCIAL CREDIT

OTHER

7. REFUSED 0. DK 9. 11A 0. INAP.; (R CODED 2, 9 OR 0 IN EEP. NO. 255)

0257 REP 0257 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-RGLR VTR IN PVNCL ELCTN BD=GE 8


Q. 55. IN PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS SINCE YOU HAVE BEEN OLD ENOUGR TO VOTE, WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU AAVE VOTED IN ALL OF THEM, BOST OF THEN, SOHE OF TAEB, OR NONE OF THEH? . . . . ..I..........--...-..-.......*-.---..-..-...-.-........

3830 1. VOTED IN ALL 2344 VOTED IN HOST 1142 32: VOTED IN SOBE

788 4. VOTED IN NONE

79 0. DK 10 9. NA

0258 REP 0258 NAHE-XPVNL ELCTN-VT SAUE PTY? ID=0 OR GE 8

LOC 306 RLDTH 1 DK 5 COL 55

DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 56-A. (FOR TROSE EHO HAVE VOTED IN PROVINCIAL ELECTIOBS) IN PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS, EAVE YOU ALWAYS VOTED FOR THE SAKE PARTY. OR HAVE YOU VOTED FOR DIFFERENT PARTIES? . . . ..-~-..~*........rlll....-........................--..~.~.-..

3930 1. VOTED FOR SAKE PARTY 3368 2. VOTED FOR DIFFERENT PARTIES

0. DK 10 9. NA

877 0. INAP (E CODED 4, 0 OR 9 IN REP. NO. 257)


VAR 0259 REP 0259 NAIIE-XPVNL ELCN-1T WCH SK PTY HD=O OR GE 7

LOC 307 YIDTA 1 DK 5 COL 56

DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 56-B. (IF SAKE PARTY) YHICH PARTY IS THAT <R HAS ALYAYS VOTED FOR XN PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS>? . . . ..~...-~.~.1..1.-.~~.~...................-...-...-....-.


293 3. NDP 273 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 120 5. UNION NATIONALE

13 6. OTHER

22 7. REFUSED 8. DK

273 9. NA 4255 0. INAP (R CODED 2, 9 OR 0 IN REF. NO. 258)

VAR 0260 REP 0260 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-QUEBEC VT '62 FDRL ELCTB RD=GE 91


Q. 59-A. (QUEBEC ONLY) IN TRE LAST THREE FEDERAL ELECTIONS- IN 1962, 1963, AND NOVEBBER BTE OF THIS/LAST YEAR, 18. CAOUETTE'S SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY OBTAINED A LARGE SHARE OF TtiE QUEBEC VOTE. YE WOULD LIKE TO KNOU IF YOU VOTED SOCIAL CREDIT IN ANY OF THESE ELECTIONS. YOUR ANSWERS ARE OF COURSE COBPLETELY CONFIDENTIAL. DID YOU HAPPEN TO VOTE FOR THE SOCIAL CREDIT CANDIDATE IN TRE 1962 FEDERAL ELECTION-TEIE FIRST ONE IN UHICH MR. CAOUETTE'S PARTY DID SO YELL? (Q. 59-B). (IF VOTED BUT NOT SOCIAL CREDIT) UHICH PARTY DID YOU VOTE FOR?

<THE DATA FOR QUESTIONS 59-A AND 59-B UERE COHBINED INTO ONE VARIABLE.> . ..-.._..-..*............--.--....-.-----.--........-....--.

66 00. DID NOT VOTE IN 1962

354 11. YES VOTED, CONSERVATIVE 1056 12. YES VOTED, LIBERAL

51 13. YES VOTED, NDP 360 14. YES VOTED, SOCIAL CREDIT

12 16. YES VOTED, OTHER 81 17. YES VOTED, REFUSED WHICH PARTY


(CONTINUED) . . . . . s . . . . m

72 18. YES VOTED, DK UHICH PARTY 60 19. YES VOTED, HA UHICH PARTX

5802 91. INAP, (R DOES NOT RESIDE IN QUEBEC) 141 96. INELIGIBLE TO VOTE, E.G., TOO YOUNG, NOT A CITIZEN

69 97. REFUSED TO ANSWER 54 98. DK IF VOTED 15 99. NA

VAR 0261 REP 0261 DATA SET ID-'7225' NANE-VOTE IN 1963 FDRL ELCTN flD=GE 96


959 00. DID NOT VOTE IN 1963

2133 3064

716 258

11. YES VOTED. CONSERVATIVE 12. YES VOTED, LIBERAL 13. YES VOTED, NDP 14. YES VOTED, SOCIAL CREDIT (BR. CAOUETTE'S) 15. YES VOTED, SOCIAL CREDIT (BR. THOBPSON'S) 16. YES VOTED, OTHER PARTX 17. YES VOTED, REFUSED UHICB PARTY 18. YES VOTED, DK WHICH PARTX 19. YES VOTED. NA UBICH PARTX

114 7

232 254

74

129 78 54

121

Q. 57-A. (ALL EXCEPT QUEBEC) THE LAST FEDERAL ELECTION BEFORE THE ONE IN NOVEMBER UAS IN 1963. DO XOU REBEBBEE FOR SURE WHETHER OR NOT YOU VOTED IN THAT ELECTION? Q. 57-B. (ALL EXCEPT QUEBEC) (IF VOTED) UAICH PARTY DID YOU VOTE FOR?

Q. 60-A. (QUEBEC ONLY) DID YOU HAPPER TO VOTE FOR THE SOCIAL CREDIT CANDIDATE IN THE FEDERAL ELECTION IR 1963, THE ONE IN UHICH MR. PEARSON'S GOVERRBENT WAS ELECTED? Q. 60-B. (QUEBEC OKLY) (IF VOTED BUT NOT SOCIAL CREDIT) WHXCA PARTY DID YOU VOTE FOR?

<DATA FOR QUESTIOKS 57-A, 57-B, 60-A, AND 60-R UERE COMBINED IN REF. NO. 261> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.--.........-.......--..-.....

96. INELIGIBLE TO VOTE, E.G., TOO YOUNG, NOT A CITIZEN 97. REFUSED 98. DK IF VOTED IN 1963 99. NA


VAR 0262 REP 0262 NARE-VOTE IN 1965 FDRL ELCTN BD=GE 97


PAGE 120

DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 58-A. (ALL EXCEPT QUEBEC) IN TALKING TO PEOPLE ABOUT THIS PAST NOVEBBER ELECTION, UE FIND THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE WEREN'T ABLE TO VOTE BECAUSE THEY UERE SICK, OR DIDN'T HAVE TIBE, OR HAD SOHE OTHER REASON FOR NOT VOTING. HOW ABOUT YOU? DID YOU VOTE THIS TIME OR DID SOBETHING KEEP YOU FROB VOTING? Q. 58-B. (ALL EXCEPT QUEBEC) (IF VOTED) FOR WHICH PARTY DID YOU VOTE?

Q. 61-A. (QUEBEC ONLY) BOW ABOUT THE ELECTION ON UOVEBBER STH. DID YOU VOTE THIS TIBE OR DID SOMETHING KEEP YOU FROK VOTING? Q. 61-B. (IF "YES It VOTED) DID YOU VOTE SOCIAL CREDIT? Q. 61-C. (QUEBEC ONLX) (IF "NO" DID ROT VOTE SOCIAL CREDIT) AHICH PARTY DID YOU VOTE FOR?

<DATA FOR QUESTIONS 58-A, SE-B, 61-A, 61-8, AND 61-C WERE COMBINED IN REF. NO. 262> -...........1.-...1_.-..-..-..*......-.--.--..-...-......-..

1135 00. NO DID NOT VOTE IN 1965

2026 11. YES VOTED, CONSERVATIVE 3156 12. XES VOTED, LIBERAL

984 13. YES VOTED, NDP 395 14. XES VOTED, SOCIAL CREDIT

45 16. YES VOTED, OTAER PARTY 294 17. XES VOTED, REFUSED UBICA PARTY

32 18. YES VOTED, DK WHICH PARTY 31 19. XES VOTED, NA REICH PARTX

60 97. REFUSED 12 98. DK IF VOTED IN 1965 23 99. NA

VAR 0263 REP 0263 NAME-XUN R DECIDED HOU TO VT BD=GE 80


DATA SET ID-'7225'

QNS. 58-C AND 61-D. WHEN DID YOU DECIDE HOU YOU WERE BEST GOING TO VOTE?

<DATA FROM QUESTIONS 58-C AND 61-D WERE COUBINED IN REF. NO.


(CONTINUED) . . . . - . ..I..

263> ..I.

2317

815 799 688 614 310 185 320

18

992 1135

(ALL ANSWERS ARE TO BE TRANSLATED INTO TIRE. EXABPLE, DECIDED AFTER HEARING SPEAKERS BECORES "DURING CAHPAIGN- TIBE UNSPECIFIED." WHERE THIS IS IHPOSSIBLE, ANSWERS ARE "IRRELEVANT.")

00. DECISION BADE PRIOR TO START OF ELECTION. ANSWERS SUCH AS, "ALREADY KNEW", "LONG BEFORE ELECTION", OR “AS SOON AS ELECTION DATE ANNOUNCED".

10. ALWAYS VOTE SAME (THUS DECISION ALWAYS BADE) 20. EARLY IN CAMPAIGN. 30. DURING CABPAIGN-TIHE UNSPECIFIED. 40, LATE IN CARPAIGN. 50. FEW DAYS BEFORE. 60. ELECTION DAY. 70. IN POLLIUG BOOTH OR STATION.

HO. OTHERS.

90. IRRELEVANT ANSWRRS. CAN'T REEEIBER. 91. INAP. ( R DID NOT VOTE IN 1965). 99. NA

VAR 0264 REP 0264 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAUE-XEASY/NOT DCSN 1965 VOTE RD=O OR GE 9


QNS. 58-D AND 61-E. YAS IT AN EASY DECISION OR NOT?

<DATA FROt4 QUESTIONS 58-D AND 61-F WERE COMBINED IN REF. NO. 264> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-......................................-..

5473 1. EASY DECISION 1564 2. NOT AN EASY DECISION

21 9. IA 1135 0. INAP (E CODED 00 IN REF. NO. 262>


VAR 0265 REF 0265 NABE-XUHY '65 VT DCSN NT EASY HD=GE 91


VAR 0266 REP

405

84 12. 20 13.

110 14. 71 15. 60 16. 96 17. 47 18.

118 19. 273 20.

66 21.

6608 91. 143 97.

84 99.

DATA SET ID-'7225'

QNS. 58-E AND 61-P. IF THE DECISION ON HOW TO VOTE WAS NOT AN EASY ONE, WHY NOT?

<DATA PROH QUESTIONS 58-E AND 61-F YERE COMBINED IN REF. NO. 265> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-..-----.--...-.....

11. LACK OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PARTIES, PLATFORB OR CANDIDATES: ALL PARTIES BAD. AND KINDRED.

CONFLICT BETREER PAST PARTY ATTACHBENTS AND SPECIFIC ISSUES (SUCH AS) . . _

BAJORITY GOVERNHENT. CORRUPTION. LEADER. FACT THAT HIS PARTY HAD NO CAANCE. OTHER. CANDIDATE. GENERAL PAST PERFOREANCES OR PLATFORM OF A PARTY. LACK OF INFORBATION. OTHER. BOTR CANDIDATES WERE GOOD.

INAP (R CODED 0 OR 1 IN REP-NO. 264) IRRELEVANT, REFUSES. NO ANSWER

NAHE-XUSED AID REAIEHBER CAND 0266 DATA SET ID-'72259 ID=0 OR GE 8


QNS. 58-F AND 61-G. DID YOU HAPPEN TO BRING ANYTHING-LIKE A POSTCARD-WHEN YOU WENT TO VOTE, IN ORDER TO HELP YOU REMEHBER WHO THE CANDIDATES WERE?

<DATA FROM QUESTIONS 58-F AND 61-G WERE COHBINED IU REF. NO. 266) ..__..____..--..._.1-.--..-....-.-.-.......-..............-.

453 1. YES 6483 2. NO


(CONTINUED) .-..-.-s.w.

60 8. DK 62 9. NA

1135 0. INAP (CODED 00 IN REF. NO. 262)

VAR 0267 REP 0267 NANE-Y CHNG VT FROM 63 TO 65 ID=GE 91


DATA SET ID-'72251

Q. 62. I NOTICE THAT YOU CAANGED YOUR VOTE FROH 1963 TO 1965. WAS THERE ANY SPECIAL REASON FOR CRANGING TRE PARTY YOU VOTED FOR? . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.-..................................-.......

28 11. PARTY BAD NO CHANCE. 61 12, DISENCAANTED WITH HIS PARTY. 98 13. DISENCEANTED UITR TYO OLD'PARTIES AND/OR RANTED TO

GIVE A CHANCE TO A NEW PARTY. 113 14. PARTY LEADER OR LEADERS. 204 15. CANDIDATE OR EIS PROGRAR.

ISSUES-SPECIFIC

70 3

42 51 51 44 73 10

5869 91, INAP. (R VOTED FOR TRE SAIYE PARTY IN 1963 AND 1965) 162 97. IRRELEVANT ANSWER, REFUSES.

1314 99. DON'T KNOW OR NO ANSUEE

16. 17. 18. 19. 20.

::: 23.

MAJORITY GOVERNHENT. CORRUPTION. SOCIAL SECURITY ISSUE. OTHERS. NEEDED CHANGE IN GOVERNBENT. OTRERS. PARTY PLATFORM OR PROGRAE. NON POLITICAL REASONS-INFLUENCE OF OTHER PERSON, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA OR NO CANDIDATE FOR RIS PARTY.

VAR 0268 REP 0268 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAEE-R'S REASON FOR 1965 VOTE HD=GE 91


Q. 63. (ASK OF THOSE ERO VOTED IN NOYEBBER ELECTION. IF DID NOT VOTE GO TO Q. 64 <REF. NO. 269>). NOY ABOUT YOUR VOTE IN THE UOVEHBER ELECTION.


513 11. TRADITIONAL VOTE. 182 12. NEEDED CHANGE.

530 13. 136 14.

80 15. 169 16.

1211 17. 382 18. 590 19.

1171 20. 242 21. 154 22.

SPECIFIC ISSUES HAJORITY. SOCIAL SECURITY. SCANDAL. OTHERS. PARTY (FOR ONE OR AGAINST ANOTHER). PARTY LEADER OR LEADERS. PARTY PLATPORl'I OR PROGRAM. CANDIDATE. OTAERS.

892 23. 146 24.

NON-POLITICAL REASONS, INFLUENCE OF OTHER PERSON OR GEOGRAPRICAL AREA OR NO CANDIDATE FOR HIS PARTY. NO SPECIAL REASON. GIVE CHANCE TO A NEW PARTY OR PROTEST VOTE.

1135 91. INAP, (DID NOT VOTE IN 1965) 290 97. IRRELEVANT, REFUSES 370 99. NO ANSWER

(CONTINUED) .a* . . . . . . . .

WAS THERE ANY SPECIAL REASON FOR VOTIRG THE WAY YOU DID? . . . . . . ..-..-....._.-................-...-..-.-.

VAR 0269 REP 0269 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAUE-VOTE LAST PROVNCL ELCTA HD=GE 97


Q. 64. (EVERYONE) NOY LET ME END THIS DISCUSSION OF HOW YOU VOTED PITH ONE HORE QUESTION, THIS TIBE ON PROVINCIAL POLITICS. FOR RRICH PARTY DID YOU HAPPEN TO VOTE IN THE LAST PROVINCIAL ELECTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-..-.-.--...---.....-...................--.

1175 00. DID NOT VOTE


587 13. NDP/CCF 561 14. SOCIAL CREDIT 195 15. UNION NATIONALE

6 16. OTHER

373 97. REFUSED 566 98. DK

.


32

(CONTINUED) . . . . se . . . . -

99. NA

VAR 0270 REP 0270 NAME-MOST IHP TYPE ELECTION ID=GE 8


2840 1. NATIONAL ELECTIONS 1473 2. PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS

588 3. LOCAL ELECTIONS 400 4. NATIONAL AND PROVINCIAL

56 5. NATIONAL AND LOCAL 75 6. PROVINCIAL AND LOCAL

2506 7. ALL EQUALLY

228 8. CAN'T CHOOSE 27 9. NA

DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 65. UHILE HOST PEOPLE THINK IT IS IHPORTANT TO VOTE IN ALL ELECTIONS IT ISN'T ALYAYS POSSIBLE TO DO SO. IF IT WERE NECESSARY TO HAKE A CHOICE, IN WHICH KIND OF ELECTION WOULD YOU SAY IT WAS HOST IflPORTAUT TO VOTE? LOCAL ELECTIONS, NATIONAL ELECTION, OR PROVINCIAL ONES? .-..-....-.................-...........-............-.-.---.

VAR 0271 REP 0271 NAME-CAl'lPAIGN lTGS ATTENDED HD=GE 8


1255 6938

DATA SET ID-'72251

Q. 66-A. NOW I'N GOING TO ASK YOU ABOUT SOME THINGS WHICA PEOPLE DO THAT HELP A PARTY OR CANDIDATE YIN AN ELECTION. I WONDER IF YOU COULD TELL NE WHETHER YOU DID ANY OF TBESE THINGS DURING THE CAHPAIGN FOR TRE NOVEHBER ELECTION- DID YOU ATTEND ANY POLITICAL HEETINGS OR GATHERINGS DURING THE CAHPAIGN? . . . . . . . ..-.-..-..-.---..--.-.----...-.-.---.............*.

1. YES, ATTENDED NEETINGS 2. NO, DID HOT ATTEND

8. DK 9. NA


VAR 0272 REP 0272 NAME-XI CAEPAIGN RTGS ATTENDD ?ID=GE 91


127 467 301 174

82 21 28

9 9

16 9

02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 10. 12. 20.

NO MEETINGS ATTENDED ONE EEETING ATTENDED TWO EEETINGS ATTENDED

6938 91. INAP. (CODED 2 OR 0 IN RBF. NO. 271) 9 96. DK HOP HAUY EEETIIIGS ATTENDED 3 99. NA

VAR 0273 REP 0273 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-READ PARTY EATERIAL IID=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'72251

Q- 66-B. (IF "YES") HOW RANY WOULD YOU SAY YOU WENT TO? . . . . . . . . ..1.-....-.-..-..-.-.---.--.--....-...-*-.--...-

ACTUAL NUMBER CODED

Q. 67. DID YOU READ ARY PARTY LEAFLETS OR REPORTS OF ELECTION SPEECHES DURING TEE CAHPAIGN? . . . . . ..-.....-............................-.-....--..

5922 1. YBS 2099 2. NO

172 8. DK 9. NA


VAR 0001 REP 0001 DATA SET ID-'72251 NABE-ICPR STUDY NONBER-7225 NO LlISSING DATA CODES

LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DR 6COL 1-4

STUDY NUMBER (7225) . . . . . . . . ..-.s....t.

VAR 0002 REF 0002 DATA SET ID-'7125 NAHE-INTERVIEW NUMBER 10 HISSING DATA CODES


RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUtBEE

THE FIRST DIGIT IDENTIFIES TRE PROVINCB AS CODED IN VARIABLE FIVE; THE NEXT FOUR DIGITS ARE THE RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUflBER UITHIN THE PROVINCE. ALL FIVE DIGITS ARE NEEDED TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY A EESPONDEUT. . . . ..-.........-..*.1..--.--........-..-....-....-...........

VAE 0003 REF 0003 DATA SET ID-'72259 NABE-INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE NO BISSING DATA CODES



RESPONDENTS YEBE RXIGHTED ACCORDING TO TBEIB COISTITUEUCY OF RESIDEICE. ALL SUBJECTS LIVIPG IN COUSTITUENCI 1049 (ALGOnA WEST, ONTARIO) THROUGH CO80 (YtBTtORTE, ONTARIO) WERE UEIGHTED BY A FACTO!? OF ORt AND ONE-TEIRD. RESIDERTS O? #040 (CARTIER, QUEBEC) THRU to48 (SAINT-JACQUES, QUEBEC) (INCLUSIVE), 1081 (YORK CENTRE, ORTARIO) TERU to88 (ROSEDALE, ONTARIO), AND ALL RESPONDtNTS FRO1 BRITISH COLUtBIA Utllt DOUBLE WEIGHTED. TAE REST OF THE COWSTITUENCIES At1 UNYEIGRTED. SEE ALSO REP. NOS. 4 AND 6.

TRE PRCQUEWCIES IEPORTtD ?OP TRIS VARIABLE ttPtl!SEtT UNYEIGBTED (RAU) FREQUENCIES FOR TEE ACTUAL tUtBtB OF DATA CASES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-..-.....-.-...~.-....*.........-...--.-..

1113 3. URYEIGHTEP CASES 588 4. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONB-TEIRD (CONSTITUEtCItS t049-t0B0) 417 6. DOUBLE YtIGHTtD (COWSTITUtNCItS #040-t048, t0Bl-

#088, AMD #I 11-tllB)


VAR 0004 REP 0004 DATA SET ID-'7225' NANE-DECIKAL WEIGHT VARIABLE NO KISSING DATA CODES

LOC 11 YIDTH 3 DK 6 COL 11-13 2 DEC PLACE(S)

DECIMAL WEIGHT VALUES PLEASE SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 3 AND 6.

THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT ONWEIGHTED [RAW) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUHBER OF CASES.

<TWO DECIKAL PLACES ARE IRPLIED>

DATA

. . . ..-........*-..*.II . . . . . . . . . .._._..-.....-.............

1113 100. UNUEIGHTED CASES 588 133. REXGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (COASTSTUENCIES

1049-t080) 417 200. DOUBLE YEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES COUO-#048,

#081-$088, AND till-1118)

'6' -..

VAR 0274 REP 0274 NAIIE-ANY PTY CANVASSED HOME? HD=GE 8


DK 6COL14

DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 68. DID ANY OF TEE PARTIES CALL AT YOUR AOKE DURING TRE ELECTION CAMPAIGN? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..I............. lll-...l...---l . . . ..I

6070 1. NO 2123 2. YES

8. DK 9. NA

VAR 0275 REP 0275 NAME-XCANVASSED BY CNSVTV KD=O OR GE 7


DATA SET ID-'7225'

<DID CONSERVATIVE PARTY CALL AT R'S AONE. SEE REF. NO. 274.> - . . . . . . ..r....r... 1-..- . . . . . . . sm...---...


(CONTINUED) ..1.---...-

877 834

228

164 20

6070

1. YES 5. NO, BUT ANOTHER PARTY DID

7. SOME PARTY CALLED, BUT R DOES NOT RENEHBER WHICH PARTY

8. DK IF PARTY CALLED 9. NA WHICH PARTY 0. INAP (NO PARTY CALLED ON R; I.E.,

CODED 1 IN REF. NO, 274)

VAR 0276 REF 0276 NAHE-XCANVASSED BY LIBERALS ID=0 OR GE 7


DATA SET ID-'7225'

<DID LIBERAL PARTY CALL AT R'S HONE. SEE REP. NO. 274.) . . . . . . . . . . . . ..1.._-...-.........-...

991 1. YES 720 5. NO, BUT ANOTHER PARTY DID

228

164 20

6070

7. SOME PARTY CALLED, BUT R DOES NOT RENEUBGI? WHICH PARTY

8. DK I? PARTY CALLED 9. NA YHICH PARTY 0. INAP (NO PARTY CALLED ON R; I.E.,

CODED 1 IN BtF. AO. 274)

VAR 0277 REP 0277 NINE-XCANVASSED BY RDP MD=0 OR GE 7

LOC 334 YIDTN 1 DK 6 COL 18

DATA SET ID-'72251

595 1116

228

164 20

<DID NDP PARTY CALL AT R'S HOIIE. Stt RtF. NO, 274.> ..--1...--.-...-......----......

1. YES 5. NO, BUT ANOTAER PARTY DID

7. SOME PARTY CALLED, BUT R DOES NOT RENENBER YHICH PARTY

8. DK I? PAltTY CALLtD 9. 111, WHICH PARTY


(CONTINUED) . . I... * . . . .

6070 0. INAP (NO PARTY CALLED ON R; I.E., CODED 1 IN REF. NO. 274)

VAR 0278 REP 0278 NAflE-XCANVASSED BY SCLCREDIT HD=O OR GE 7


DATA SET ID-'7225'

<DID SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY CALL AT R'S 8013. SEE REF. NO. 274.> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..~..-~~~~..~.....~.....~..

94 1. YES 1617 5. NO, BUT ANOTHER PARTY DID

228

164 20

6070

7. SOME PARTY CALLED, BUT R DOES NOT REMEMBER NHICH PARTY

8. DK IF PARTY CALLED 9. NA UHICH PARTY 0. INAP (NO PARTY CALLED ON R: I.E.,

CODED 1 IN REF. NO. 274)

VAR 0279 REP 0279 NAME-XCANVASSED BY OTHER PTY MD=0 OR GE 7


DATA SET ID-'7225'

<DID OTHER PARTY CALL AT R'S HOME. SEE REF. NO. 274.> ..-..--.....I.........--.--....-..

16 1. YES 1695 5. NO, BUT ANOTBER PARTY DID

228

164 20

6070

7. SOME PARTY CALLED, BUT R DOES NOT REMEHBEE WHICH PARTY

8. DK IF PARTY CALLED 9. NA WHICH PARTY 0. INAP (NO PARTY CALLED ON R; I.E.,

CODED 1 IR REF. NO. 274)


VAR 0280 REP 0280 NABE-DID R HELP A PTY/CAND BD=GE B


DATA SET ID-'7225'

419 7741

33

Q. 69. DID YOU PERSONALLY EELP DIVE OF THE PARTIES OR A CANDIDATE? (FOR EXAHPLE, BY CANVASSING, ADDBESSING PABPHLETS.) . . . ..-........-.......-..-..............*.-...-..-.....

1. YES, HELPED 2. NO

8. DK 9, NA

VAR 0281 REP 0281 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAIE-TRY TO INFLUENCE OTR VT BD=GE 0


Q. 70. DID YOU, ON YOUR OYA, TALK TO AAY PEOPLE AID TRY TO SROY TBEB YAY THEY SEOULD VOTE FOR OBE OF TBE PARTIES OR CANDIDATES? . . . . . . . . . ..-._I-.--..........-.-...-...................-...

1037 1, TALKED TO OTEERS 6234 2. DID HOT

81 8. DK 41 9. NA

VAR 0282 REP 0282 NAME-IS R BBE POLTL ORCR BD=GE 8

LOC 339 YIDTH 1 DR 6 COL 23

DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 71. DO YOU BELONG TO AWY POLITICAL CL5B OR ORGANILATION? . . . . . . . . ..-..................-...-.........~*....-.-*.*..--.

360 1. YES, BELONG 7822 2. NO

8. DK 11 9. AA


VAR 0283 REP 0283 NABE-B/H ABT (FDBL)FUND RAISE ED=GE 8

LOC 340 BIDTB 1 DK 6 COL 24

DATA SET ID-172251

Q- 72. THIS YEAR, DID YOU HEAX OR BEAD ANYTBIBG ABOUT A FEDERAL POLITICAL PARTY OR CANDIDATE HAVING A DRIVE, A DINNEB. OR SOHE OTBER AFFAIR TO RAISE MONEY FOR CAUPAIGN EXPENSES?

1676 5226 ::

HEARD OF HONEY RAISING DID BOT

1277 8. DK 14 9. NA

VAR 0284 REF 0204 NAEE-R CANVASSED FOR CNTRBN ED=GE 0


DATA SET ID-972258

Q. 73, DID YOU YOURSELF, ASK ANYBODY TO GIVE MONEY TO BELP PAY TEE COSTS DURING THE BOVEHBER ELECTION CAMPAIGN OF A CANDIDATE OR POLITlCAL PARTY? .11-.11...--........................-..-..-..-..--.........

85 3:

YES, ASKED FOR CONTRIBUTION 8073 10, DID NOT

29 8. DK 6 9. IIA

VAR 0285 REP 0285 NAtlE-UAS HSLD ASKD FOB CATBBN BD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 74-A. DURING THIS LAST YEAR, BEBE YOU OR ANY BEHBEB OF YOUR ROUSEHOLD ASKED TO GIVE EONEY, BUY TICKETS, OR OTHERVISE COBTRIBUTE FIUANCIALLY TO HELP PAY THE CAEPAIGN EXPENSES OF A POLITICAL PARTY OR CANDIDATE? 1.-..-.-...............-..............*...-.....--....-...

422 YES 7413 :: no


(CONTINUED) I..........

358 8. DK 9. WA

VAR 0286 BEF 0286 NAEE-XWAS R ASKED FOB CNTRBN ID=0 OR GE 8


DATA SET ID-172251

Q. 74-B. (IF "YES") UEBE YOU, YOURSELF, ASKED <FOB POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION> OR YAS THIS SOEE OTHEB BEEBER OF YOUR HOUSEHOLD? . . . . . . ..-...._......--.---..-....................-.-.-..

248 1. RESPONDENT ONLY UAS ASKED 48 2. RESPONDENT AND FABILY EEHBER WERE ASKED

126 3. FAIILY EEKBEB OBLY UAS ASKED

8. DK UHO UAS ASKED 7771 0. INAP (CODED 2 OR 8 IN BEF. 10, 285)

VAR 0287 BEF 0287 DATA SET ID-172251 NAME-XCNSVTV ASKD R FR CNTBBN ID=0 OR GE 8


IF RESPONDENT UAS ASKED TO GIVE MONEY, ASK QUESTIONS 75, 76, 77 <BEFP. NOS. 207-293>. ALL OTHERS GO TO Q. 78 <REF. NO. 294>.

Q- 75. (IF ASKED TO GIVE MONEY) BY YHICB PARTIES EEBE YOU ASKED? <CONSERVATIVE PARTY ASK B> . . . . . . . . . . ..r...---.......-................-.--*-..--.--..

:: YES NO, BUT ABOTBER PARTY DID ASK B

16 8. DK PHICH PARTY 8 9. WA DEICE PARTY

7097 0. XNAP (R CODED 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 286)


VAR 0288 REP 0288 NAKE-XLBRL ASKED R FOR CNTBBN MD=0 OR GE 8

LOC 345 HIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 29

V AR

DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 75. (IF ASKED TO GIVE MONEY) BY BHICH PARTIES UEBE YOU ASKED? <LIBERAL PARTY ASK B> .-....-..---..-.-.--...-.*-..----....*.............-.~....

86 1. YES 186 5. NO, BUT ANOTHER PARTY DID ASK R

16 8. DK UHICH PARTY

7891: 9, NA UHICH PARTY 0. INAP (R CODED 3, 8, OR 0 IB REF. NO. 286)

0289 REP 0289 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XNDP ASKED B FOR CNTRBN MD=0 08 GE 8


Q. 75. (IF ASKED TO GIVE HONEY) BY WHICH PARTIES BEEE YOU ASKED? <NDP ASK R> . . . . . ..*...1.......1...-.-..--..----..-.-..-.-............

130 1. YES 142 5. NO, BUT ANOTHER PARTY DID ASK R

16 8. DK YRICH PARTY

78978 9. IA UHICH PARTY 0. INAP (R CODED 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 286)

VAR 0290 REP 0290 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-XSOCRDT ASKD B PR CNTBBN ND=0 OR GE 8


Q. 75. (IF ASKED TO GIVE EONEY) BY WHICH PARTIES UEBE YOU ASKED? <SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY ASK B> ..--..-..............-....-..........-.......-.-.......---

27 YES 245 :: NO, BUT ANOTHER PARTY DID ASK B


(CONTXNUED) . . . . . . ..-.I

16 8. DK UHICH PARTY 0 9. NA UHICH PARTY

7897 0. INAP (R CODED 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 286)

VAR 0291 REP 0291 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAME-XOTR PTY ASKD R FR CNTBB flD=O OR GE 8


Q. 75. (IF ASKED TO GIVE HONEY) BY WAICB PARTIES YERE YOU ASKED? <OTHER PARTY ASK R> . . . .._...............-..-.............-...-.-......-......

3 YES 269 :: NO, BUT ANOTHER PARTY DID ASK B

16 8. DK UBICH PARTY 0 9. NA WHICH PARTY

7897 0. INAP (R CODED 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 286)

VAR 0292 REP 0292 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-XHOW R APRCHD FR CNTRBN ED=0 OR GE 8


Q. 76. IN UHAT WAY WERE YOU APPROACHED UHEN YOU UEBE ASKED FOB MONEY? BY LETTER? BY TELEPBONE? BY SOI'IEONE IN PERSON? AT A DINNER OR A MEETING? .-..................--..............-.,.-.*.-.............-.

83 1. LETTER 24 2. TELEPHONE

118 3. IN PERSON 30 4. AT A DINNER OR A EEETING 13 5, OTHER 16 7. COBBINATION OF ABOVE UAYS

4 8. DK

789; 9. 0. NA INAP (R CODED 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 286)


VAR 0293 REP 0293 NABE-X R KNEY HONEY CARVASSER ID=0 OR GE 9


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 77-A. WERE YOU ASKED <FOR POLITICAL CONTEIBUTION> BY SOHEONE YOU KNEW PERSONALLY OR BY SOlEONE YOU DIDN'T KNOY? Q. 77-R. (IF KROYN) HOW DID YOU KNOW HII/HER? . . ..-.....'..1...-.........-..-.....-.--.-..........-.....

101 1. CARAVASSER NOT KNOWN

6X 2. RELATIVE 3. FRIEND

52 14 ::

FELLOY YORKER, BUSINESS COLLEAGUE NEIGHBOUR

40 6. OTHER

14 9. HA 7897 0. XNAP. (E CODED 3, 8 OR 0 IN BEP. NO. 286)

VAR 0294 REP 0294 DATA SET ID-'72258 NAHE-PTY R COYTRIBUTED TO RD=GE 9


Q. 78-A. DID YOU GIVK ROREY, BOY TICKETS, OR NAKE OTHER FINANCIAL CONTEIBUTXONS TO HELP A CANDIDATE OR PARTY PAY CABPAIGN EXPENSES TOR TAIS LAST ELECTION? Q. 78-B. (IF "YES") TO HIlICE PIETY DID YOU GIVK? <DATA PROB Q. 78-A AND 78-B YBRE COHBINED Ill RE?. 110. 294> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.--..............-.....-................

7952 0.

49 1. 46 2. 94 3. 24 4.

3 5. 4 6.

15 a.

6 9.

NO, DID NOT RAKE COWTRIBUTIOK

YBS, TO COliSERVATIVES YES, TO LIBERALS YES, TO NDP Y1.5, X0 SOCIAL CREDIT YES, TO OTRCN PARTT YES, TO LIBERALS AND YDP

YES GAVE, MA YHICR PARTY

AA


VAR 0295 REP 0295 NAEE-OTR IN PAH1I.Y CONTRIBUTE BD=GE 18


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 79-A. AS FAE AS YOU KNOW, DID ANY OTREE BEEBER OF YOUR HOUSEHOLD CONTRIBUTE TO A CANDIDATE OR PARTY'S CAMPAIGN FUND? Q. 79-B. (IF "YES") TO WHICH PARTY DID TREY GIVE?

<DATA PROM QNS. 79-A AND 79-B WERE COHBINED IN REF. NO. 295> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..--..............*...-.--.--..--....

7653 00. NO, NO ONE ELSE COnTRIBUTED 31 11. YES, TO CONSERVATIVES 59 12. YES, TO LIBERALS 55 13. YES, TO NDP

6 14. YES, TO SOCIAL CRBDIT 6 15. YES, TO CREDXTISTE

16. YES, TO OTEER PARTY 6 17. YES, DK PARTY

12 18. DK <Q. 79-A) 19. YES, NA YHICA PARTY

359 98. DK IF GAVE 6 99. NA IF GAVE

VAR 0296 BEF 0296 NAME-ULD R HAVE CNTRBD IF ASK HD=O OR GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 80. (ONLY IF DID NOT HAKE C~BTRIBUTION IN Q 78-A <REP. NO. 294>). IF YOU HAD BEEN ASKED TO RAKE SORE CONTRIBUTION TO YOUR FAVOORITE PARTY OR A CANDIDATE YOU LIKED, UOULD YOU HAVE GIVEN HONEY? -.-.............-.......-..........-.....-..-.--.....-*.-..

15u5 1. YOULD HAVE BADE CONTRIBUTION 5131 2. YOULD NOT HAVE

1258 8. DA 24 9. NA

235 O- INAP (CODED l-8 IN REF. NO. 294)


VAR 0297 REP 0297 NABE-R ULD GV BNY/TIHE TO PTY BD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 81. WHICH POULD YOU RATHER DO TO HELP YOUR PARTY OR FAVOURITE CANDIDATE: GIVE BONEY OR GIVE TIBE? . . . . . . ..*.............-...*................-....--.....

799 1. GIVE fiONEY 3981 2. GIVE TIBE

478 3. PREFER BOTH EQUALLY 2401 4. DON'T CARE TO DO EITHER

516 8. DK 18 9. WA

VAR 0298 REP 0298 NABE-ATTD ABT BUSNEUN CNTRBN BD=GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

486 1. GOOD THING PEOB BUSINESS CORPORATIONS 250 2. NOT A GOOD THING PRO8 BUSINESS COBPORATIONS 166 3. GOOD THING PROM TRADE UNIONS

40 4. NOT A GOOD THING FRO8 TRADE UNIONS 1537 5. GOOD THING FROM BOTH 4279 6. NOT A GOOD THING FROB EITHER

1415 8. DK 20 9. NA

VAR 0299

Q. 82. HOU DO YOU FEEL ABOUT CONTRIBUTIONS TO POLITICAL PARTIES FROB ORGANIZATIONS LIKE BUSINESS CORPORATIONS OR TRADE UNIONS? DO YOU THINK IT IS A GOOD THING OR NOT FOR OUR PARTIES TO RECEIVE SUCH CONTRIBUTIONS? *..-......*..-..-*-...................--.................

REP 0299 NABE-SHLD CNTRBN DCTBL INC-TX BD=GE 0


DATA SET ID-'.7225

Q. 83-A. WOULD YOU BE AGAINST OR IN FAVOUB OF ALLOWING PEOPLE TO DEDUCT PROM THEIR INCOBE TAX THE MONEY TBEY GIVE TO PARTIES AND CANDIDATES, IN THE SAME YAY THAT THEY DEDUCT BONEY THEY GIVE TO CAARITY? . ..-.......I-I...-I--.-.-.-........---.-.--.---...-....-..-.


(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . w...

2455 5316 ::

IN FAVOR OF IT AGAINST IT

422 8. DK

VAR 0300 REP 0300 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAME-SHLD PTY PUBLISH XPENSES BD=GE 8


0. 84-A. THE ABOUNT OF MONEY IT COSTS A POLITICAL PARTY TO RUN AN ELECTION CAMPAIGN DOES NOT HAVE TO BE BADE PUBLIC AT PRESENT. SHOULD IT BE REQUIRED THAT PARTIES PUBLISH THEIR EXPENSES OR NOT? ..s . . . . . . ..I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1-s.1.-s......... 1...- . . . . . . .

5680 1. SHOULD PUBLISH 1671 2. SHOULD NOT

806 8. DK 36 9. WA

VAR 0301 REP 0301 NINE-PTY CNTRBR StiLD BE KNOWN ID-GE 8


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q- 84-B. SHOULD PARTIES BE REQUIRRD TO DISCLOSE THE NAHES OF THEIR CONTRIBUTORS? _................._.............-.-..*....-........-..*...

3490 1. YES 3899 2- NO

786 8. DK 18 9. WA

VAB 0302 REP 0302 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-SHLD PTY REVEAL d CNTBBN BD=GE 8

LOC 360 YIDTH 1 DK 6 CoL 44

Q. 84-C. SBOULD PARTIES BE REQUIRED TO DISCLOSE THE AIOUNTS

1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 1UO

(CONTINUED) -.1--s...-.

GIVER BY EACH CONTRIBUTOR? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3311 1. YES 4078 2. NO

752 8. DR 52 9. IA

VAR 0303 REP 0303 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAHE-SHLD GOVT PAY CLlPN XPNS RD=GE 8

LOC 361 UIDTH 1 DK 6 CDL 45

Q. 85. DO YOU THINK THE GOVERIHENT SHOULD PAY ALL, SOME OR NONE OF THE COSTS OF POLITICAL CAIPAIGNS? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-..........---.--....-....--.-.-.-....

2450 1. ALL 3045 2. SOHE 1975 3. NONE

695 8. DR 28 9. NA

VAR 0304 REP 0304 NAHE-R'S I'IARITAL STATUS ID=GE 9

LOC 362 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL Q6

DATA SET ID-'72251

Q. 86. ARE IOU HARRIED, WIDOWED, SEPARATED, DIVORCED, OR ARE YOU SINGLE? . . ..~.....".~...............~...................~...~~.~

61(73 IARRIED 649 :: UIDOWED 119 3. SEPARATED 9:: 2 DIVORCED

SINGLE

3 9. NA


VAR 0305 REP 0305 NAME-RHO IS MAIN WAGE EARNER BD=GE 9


3848 1. 3075 2.

235 3. 3 4.

753 5.

47 155

73

u

VAR 0306 REP 0306

DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 07. WRO USUALLY IS YOUR YARILX'S RAIN WAGE EARRER? em.I..mm.qs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * . . . ..I.....................

6. 7. 8.

RESPONDENT, WHO IS FIALE HEAD (INCLUDES SINGLE BAN) RESPONDENT'S AUSBAND RESPONDENT'S FATHER RESPONDENT'S FATRER-IN-LAW RESPONDENT, WE0 IS PEBALE HEAD (INCLUDES SINGLE WOH AN) RESPONDENT'S WIFE OTHER BALE OTHER FEUALE

9. NA

NAME-BAIN EARNER'S OCCUPATION BD=GE 99 LOC 364 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 48-49

DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 88. WHAT IS THE RAIN EARNER'S (YOUR) OCCUPATION? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..--.....-.........--....-.......

702 912 355 903

2373 67

421 797 507

10. 20. 32. 37. 40. 60. 69. 70. 80.

PROFESSIONAL OWNERS, HANAGERS, BUSINESS EXECUTIVES SALES PEOPLE CLERICAL, OTRER WHITE COLLAR SKILLED LABOUR ARBED FORCES SERVICE, INDUSTRY AND PROTECTIVE UNSKILLED LABOUR FARBERS

109 94. UNEBPLOXED 730 95. PENSIONED, RETIRED 220 96. WIDOWS, SPINSTERS

17 99. NA

1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION

VAR 0307 NAME-R'S YEARS OF SCHOOLING

LOC 366 WIDTH 2

Q. 09. HOW RANX

STUDY PAGE 142

REP 0307 DATA SET ID-'7225' NO RISSING DATA CODES

DK 6 COL SO-51

YEARS OF SCHOOL DID YOU ATTEND? -............I....-....-...-.-..*.--......-.--..

ACTUAL NUEBER OF YEARS CODED

86 10 69

131 192 225 417 560

1134 874

1042 a25 1026

407 295 201 221 160

80 65 55

6 6 8 7 4 4 3

00. NO SCROOLING 01. ONE YEAR OF SCHOOL 02. TYO YEARS OF SCHOOL 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09.

::: 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20.

5:: 23. 24. 25. 26. 30.

VAR 0308 REP 0308 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAME-R'S SCL CLASS-OWN RANKG RD=GE 6


Q. 90. IF YOU HAD TO PICK ONE, WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING FIVE SOCIAL CLASSES WOULD YOU SAX YOU WERE IN -- UPPER CLASS, UPPER-RIDDLE CLASS, RIDDLE CLASS, WORKING CLASS, OR LOWER CLASS? . . . ..-...1_._.*.......--.-................................*


(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . -.

74 1. UPPER CLASS 683 2. UPPER-RIDDLE CLASS

3115 3. BIDDLE CLASS 3665 4. WORKING CLASS

294 5. LOWER CLASS

137 6. THERE IS NO SUCH THING 198 8. DK

7 9. NA

VAR 0309 REP 0309 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-R'S CHURCH PREFERENCE NO RISSING DATA CODES

LOC 369 WIDTH 2 DK 6 cOL 53-54

Q. 91. WOULD YOU RIND TELLING OF WHAT RELIGION YOU ARE? . . . . ..__._..........-....--....-..--....................

260 00.

402 10. 259 11. 273 12.

1836 15. 1052 16.

384 19.

3433 20.

146 30.

106 70. 36 71.

6 79.

NONE

PRESBYTERIAN LUTHERAN BAPTIST UNITED CHURCH ANGLICAN OTHER PROTESTANT

ROEAN CATHOLIC

JEWISH

UKRAINIAN (GREEK) CATHOLIC GREEK ORTHODOX

ALL OTHER

VAR 0310 NAME-X R'S CHURCH ATTENDANCE

REP 0310 DATA SET ID-'7225' FlD=O OR GE 9


Q. 92. (IF RELIGION BENTIONED) ASK Q. 92 <REF. NO. 310). FOR OTHERS GO TO Q- 93 <REF. NO. 311>. ABOUT HOW OFTEN DO YOU GO TO CHURCH? AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK, TWO OR TBREE TIMES A RONTH, ONCE A BONTH, A FEU TIBES


(CONTINUED) ..a . . . . ..I.

A YEAR OR LESS, NEVER? . . ..I.................

3755 1. AT LEAST WEEKLY 824 2. 2 OR 3 TIMES HONTHLX 601 3. ONCE A flONTH

2180 4. A FEW TIRES A YEAR OR LESS 538 5. NEVER

35 9. NA 260 0. INAP. (CODED 00 IN REF. NO. 309)

VAR 0311 REP 0311 DATA SET ID-'7225' NANE-R'S ETHNIC ORIGIN NO MISSING DATA CODES


Q. 93. PLEASE TELL RE FROM YHAT COUNTRY BOST OF YOUR ANCESTORS CAHE? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.-.....--.......---.-.*.....-...

599

3855 300. BRITISH ISLES 1916 312. FRANCE

321 315. GERMANY 108 317. NETHERLANDS 161 320. SCANDINAVIAN COUNTRIES

57 333. HUNGARY 209 336. POLAND 275 337. UKRAINE/RUSSIA 162 351. ITALY

289 42

390. 590.

999.

OTHER EUROPEAN ASIATIC

199 ALL OTHER


200. NORTH ABERICAN COUNTRY (INCLUDES RENTION OF CANADA)

NABE-R'S PLACE OF BIRTH NO KISSING DATA CODES LOC 375 WIDTH 3 DK 6 COL 59-61

Q. 94-A. IN WHAT COUNTRY WERE YOU BORN? . ..~~...........1......................~


(CONTINUED) . . . . em . . . . .

122 199. 6595 209.

674 300. 93 315. 57 317. 43 333.

126 336. 59 337.

103 351. 212 390.

UNITED STATES CANADA

BRITISH ISLES GERMANY NETHERLANDS HUNGARY POLAND RUSSIA ITALY OTHER EUROPEAN

109 999. ALL OTHER

VAR 0313 REP 0313 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAtiE-XXR IHBIGRATED TO CANADA MD=0 OR GE 9.


IF RESPONDENT YAS BORN OUTSIDE OF CANADA, ASK Q. 94-B <REF. NO. 313).

Q. 94-B. (IF BORN OUTSIDE CANADA) IN UHAT YEAR DID YOU BECORE AN IREIGRANT TO CANADA? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..1-.......... . . ..-...-_..*......-111-

661 1. BETWEEN 1946 AND 1960 65 2. BETWEEN 1939 AND 1945

823 3. BEFORE 1939 31 4. AFTER 1960

18 9. NA 6595 0. INAP. (R CODED 209 IN REF. NO. 312)

VAR 0314 REP 0314 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOHE ID=9


Q. 95. WHAT LANGUAGE DO YOU ROST OFTEN SPEAK AT HOtIE? .1.....-*..._...........-.-..-...-.......-...-..-.....

5607 1. ENGLISH 2234

60 :: FRENCH ITALIAN, SPANISE, GREEK, PORTUGUESE, BALTESE

1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 1P6

(CONTINUED) .-me . . . . . . .

99 0. GERHAN, DUTCH, LATVIAN, BELGIAN, LITHUANIAN, AUSTRIAN

123 5. SLAVIC, RUSSIAN, UKRANIAN, POLISH, ARBENIAN, CZECH, RUIANIAN; BULGARIAN, SERBIAN

54 6. SCANDANAVIAN, FINNISH, SWEDISH, NORWEGIAN, DANISH, ICELANDIC, ESTONIAN, HUNGARIAN

6 7. OTHER NON-EUROPEAN, CHINESE, JAPANESE, LEBANESE, ETC.

10 9. NA

VAR 0315 REF 0315 NAME-SIZE PLACE R GREW UP MD=9


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 96. WHEN YOU WERE GROAING UP UHERE DID YOU LIVE MOSTLY, IN A CITY OR SUBURB, IN A VILLAGE OR SHALL TOUN, OR ON A FARI? ~.................~................~.....~~~.~.............

2248 1. PARfl(S) 2648 2. VILLAGE(S) OR SMALL TOWN(S) 3263 3. CITIES OR SUBURBS

34 9. NA

VAR 0316 REP 0316 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LIVED IN OTHER PROVINCES NO MISSING DATA CODES


Q. 91-A. HAVE YOU EVER LIVED IN ANY OTHER CANADIAN PROVINCE FOR MORE THAN SIX MONTHS? ..*_..._--.-.........*........*..........--.---.-.-.........

2436 YES 5757 1: NO


VAR 0317 REP 0317 NAME-XR LIVED IN NEWFOUNDLAND ID=0 OR GE 9

LOC 382 PIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 66

DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 97-B. (IF "YES") WHICA ONES? <R HAS LIVED IN NEYPOUNDLAND?> . . ..-1-..........................-.....*...--....

94 1. YES 23 11 5. NO

31 9. NA WHICH ONES 5757 0. INAP (R CODED 2 IN REP. NO. 316)

VAR 0318 REP 0318 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XR LIVED IN PRNC ED ILND BD=O OR GE 9


Q. 97-B. (IF "YES") WHICH ONES? <R HAS LIVED IN PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND?> . . . ..--..-..........---..-----...........---...*.----...

40 1. YES 2365 5, NO

31 9. NA UHICH ONES 5757 0. INAP (R CODED 2 IN REP. NO. 316)

VAR 0319 REP 0319 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-XR LIVED IN NOVA SCOTIA LID=0 OR GE 9

LOC 38U WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 68

Q. 97-B. (IP "YES") YAICH ONES? <R HAS LIVED IN NOVA SCOTIA?> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..11---.-..-..-..--.............--.--.

228 1. YES 2177 5. NO

31 9. NA WAICH ONES 575-l 0. INAP (R CODED 2 IN REP. NO. 316)


VAR 0320 REP 0320 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-XR LIVED IN N.BRUNSYICK HD=O OR GE 9


Q. 97-B. (IF "YES") YHICH ONES? <R HAS LIVED IN NEU BRUNSWICK?> . . . . . . . . . . . . ..I......................................

197 1. YES 2208 5. NO

57:: 9. NA UHICR ONES 0. INAP (R CODED 2 IN REP, NO- 316)

VAR 0321 REP 0321 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-XR LIVED IN QUEBEC BD=O OR GE 9


Q. 97-B. (IF "YES") UHICH ONES? <R HAS LIVED IN QUEBEC?> ..I..........................................,............

411 1. YES 1994 5. NO

57:: 9. NA YHICH ONES 0. INAP (R CODED 2 IN REP. NO. 316)

VAR 0322 REP 0322 NAIVE-XR LIVED IN ONTARIO ID=0 OR GE 9


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 97-B. (IF "YES") UAICH ONES? <R HAS LIVED IN ONTARIO?> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..~.....................................

587 YES 1818 :: NO

31 9. NA UHICH ONES 5757 0. INAP (R CODED 2 IN REP. NO. 316)


VAR 0323 REP 0323 NAIIE-XR LIVED IN KANITOBA LID=0 OR GE 9


DATA SET ID-'7225'

Q. 97-B. (IF "YES") UHICH ONES? <R HAS LIVED IN l!IANITOBA?> ..I.........,...............................................

394 1. YES 2011 S. NO

57:: 9. NA WHICH ONES 0. XNAP (R CODED 2 IN REP. NO. 316)

VAR 0324 REF 0324 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAnE-XR LIVED IN SASKACTHEUAN ID=0 OR GE 9

LOC 389 UIDTR 1 DK 6 COL 73

Q. 97-0, (IF "YES") UHICH ONES? <R HAS LIVED IN SASKATCHEWAN?> . . . . ..*..*.......................................

464 YES 1941 :: NO

31 9. NA UAICH ONES 5757 0. INAP (R CODED 2 IN REF. NO. 316)

VAR 0325 REP 0325 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAME-XR LIVED IN ALBERTA tlD=O OR GE 9


Q. 97-E. (IF "YES") UHICH ONES? <R HAS LIVED IN ALBERTA?> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

414 1991

57::

1. YES 5. NO

9. NA WHICH ONES 0. INAP (R CODED 2 IN REP. NO. 316)


VAR 0326 REP 0326 NAHE-XR LIVED IN BRITCOLOBBIA HD=O OR GE 9


PAGE 150

DATA SET ID-'72251

Q. 97-B. (IF "YES") UHICH ONES? <R HAS LIVED IN BRITISH COLUflBIA?> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..*..........

347 1. YES 2058 5. NO

31 9. NA WHICH ONES 5757 0. INAP (R CODED 2 IN REP. NO. 316)

VAR 0001 REF 0001 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-ICPR STUDY NUMBER-7225 NO MISSING DATA CODES

LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK ICOL 1-4

STUDY NUBBER (7225) . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..m...

VAR 0002 REP 0002 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-INTERVIEW NUNBER NO BISSING DATA CODES


RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUBBER

TAE FIRST DIGIT IDENTIFIES THE PROVINCE AS CODED IN VARIABLE FIVE; THE NEXT FOUR DIGITS ARE THE RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUBBER WITHIN THE PROVINCE. ALL FIVE DIGITS ARE NEEDED TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY A RESPONDENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

VAR 0003 REP 0003 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE NO BISSING DATA CODES


INTEGER HEIGHT VALOES

RESPONDENTS WERE WEIGHTED ACCORDING TO THEIR CONSTITUENCY OF RESIDENCE. ALL SUBJECTS LIVING IN CONSTITUENCY 1OU9 (ALGOIIA WEST, ONTARIO) THROUGH to80 (WENTWORTH, ONTARIO) HERE WEIGHTED BY A FACTOR OF ONE AND ONE-THIRD. RESIDENTS OF


(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .

(040 (CARTIER, QUEBEC) TREU 1048 (SAINT-JACQUES, QUEBEC) (INCLUSIVE), CO81 (YORK CENTRE, ONTARIO) THRU t088 (ROSEDALE, ONTARIO), AND ALL RESPONDENTS FROB BRITISH COLUHBIA YERE DOUBLE WEIGHTED. THE REST OF THE CONSTITUENCIES ARE UNWEIGHTED. SEE ALSO REP. NOS. 4 AND 6.

THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNUEIGHTED (RAU) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUHBER OF DATA CASES. . . . . . . . . . ..-............................-----.-.....-.-..-..

1113 3, UNUEIGHTED CASES 588 4. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES #049-tO80) 417 6. DOUBLE WEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES t040-t048, #OBl-

1088, AND #ill-tl18)

VAR 0004 REP 0004 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DECIMAL WEIGHT VARIABLE NO HISSING DATA CODES

DK 7 COL 11-13 2 DEC PLACE(S) LOC 11 WIDTH 3

DECIMAL UEIGHT PLEASE SEE ALSO

VALUES REP. NOS. 3 AND 6.

TAE FREQUENCIES UNWEIGHTED (RAW CASES.

REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT ) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DATA

1113 500

417

<TWO DECIBAL PLACES ARE IHPLIED> . . . . . . . . . ..1..1_.._...--..-..--.-.----.*.-..-..--..-.-....

100. ONWEIGHTED CASES 133. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES

to49-#080) 200. DOUBLE UEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES #040-(048,

#081-P088, AND #Ill-C118)

'7' DK 7COf.14 . . .

1965 CANADIAA NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 152

VAR 0327 REP 0327 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAME-R/H.H HBR LABOR UNION ID=0 OR GE 8

LOC 392 WIDTH 1 DU 7COL15

Q. 90. DO YOU (OR DOES THE HEAD OF THIS HOUSEHOLD) BELONG TO ANY OF THE FOLLOWING GROUPS: A LABOUR UNION: A TRADE ASSOCIATION; A FARN ORGANIZATION; A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION: ANY OTHER ASSOCIATIONS, CLUBS, OR ORGANIZATIONS? <BELONG TO LABOR UNION?> . . . . ..1--__1...-.*-....-..-..-...-.-..*...................

1911 1. YES, BELONG TO LABOR UNION 2519 5. NO

134 0. DK 39 9. NA

3590 0. INAP (R AND HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD BELONG TO NO ORGANIZATION)

VAR 0328 REP 0328 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAflE-R/H.B HBR TRADE ASCN HD=O OR GE 8


<R/HEAD BELONG TO TRADE ASSOCIATION? SEE REF. NO. 327) . . . . . . ..*..-..-.......-...-..--.-..--.---..............

330 1. YES, BELONG TO TRADE ASSOCIATION 4100 5. NO

134 8. DR 39 9. NA


VAR 0329 REF 0329 NABE-R/H-H RBR PARH ORGN ID=0 OR GE B

LOC 394 WIDTA 1 DR 7 COL 17

DATA SET ID-'7225'

<R/READ BELONG TO FARH ORGANIZATION? SEE REP. NO. 327) ..--._..__...-...._...--.-..................-..........

313 1. YES, BELONG TO FARH ORGANIZATION 4117 5. NO


(CONTINUED) s . . . . . . . . . .

134 0. DK 39 9. NA


VAR 0330 REF 0330 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-R/H-H HBR PRFNL ASCN HD=O OR GE 8

LOC 395 WIDTH 1 DK 7COLlB

<R/HEAD BELONG TO PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION? SEE REP, NO, 327> _...._.._.__._.__._..**-------.....---..-.--........-....

957 3473

134 39

3590

YES, BELONG TO PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION :: NO

0. DK 9. NA 0. IRAP (R AND HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD BELONG TO

10 ORGANIZATION)

VAR 0331 REF 0331 DATA SET ID-'7225' NALRE-R/H-H NBR OTR VLNTY ASCY ID=0 OR GE 8


<R/HEAD BELOIIG TO ANY OTHER VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATIONS? SEE REF. NO. 327> . .._..._._...-.-.1_.*---.--..-................-.........

1705 :: NO

YES, BELONG TO OTHER VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATIONS 2725

134 8. DK 9. NA. 0. INAP (R AND HEAD OF HOUSEROLD BELORG TO NO

ORGAEIZATIOE)


VAR 0332 REP 0332 NAME-XR VISITED OTHER'S HOME ND=0 OR GE 9


DATA SET ID-'7225'

FOR RESPONDENTS LIVING IN QUEBEC ONLY, ASK QUESTIONS 99, 100, 101 <REF. NOS. 332-334>. FOR ALL OTHERS GO TO QUESTION 102 <REF. NO. 335>

Q. 99. (QUEBEC ONLY) DURING THE LAST SEVEN DAYS, HAVE YOU VISITED OTHER PEOPLE AT THEIR HONES? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.........*.......*...........

1. YES 2. NO

9.. NA 0. INAP. (R DOES NOT LIVE IN QUEBEC)

VAR 0333 REP 0333 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XOTHERS VISITED R'S HOME HD=O OR GE 9


Q. 100. (QUEBEC ONLY) DURING THE LAST SEVEN DAYS, HAVE OTHER PEOPLE VISITED YOU AT YOUR HOHE? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.*......................*.--...*...

1680 1. YES 696 2. NO

15 9. NA 5802 0. INAP. (R DOES NOT LIVE IN QUEBEC)

VAR 0334 REP 0334 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-XR HAS BEEN OUT W OTHERS ED=0 OR GE 9


Q- 101. (QUEBEC ONLY) DURING THE LAST SEVEN DAYS, HAVE YOU BEEN OUT WITH OTHER PEOPLE SOMEUHERE ELSE THAN AT RELATIVES' OR FRIENDS' HORES? .__........-....................*.................*.........

1119 1. YES 1257 2. NO


(CONTINUED) . . . ...*....

PAGE 155

58:: 9. NA 0. INAP. (R DOES NOT LIVE IN QUEBEC)

VAR 0335 REP 0335 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-R'S AGE HD=O


Q. 102. (EVERYONE) WHAT IS YOUR AGE? .s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . s . . . . . . . me . . . . . . . _.I

ACTUAL AGE CODED

67 00. NA

111 21. TUENTY-ONE YEARS 149 22. TWENTY-TUO YEARS

FREQ AGE . 187 23 _ 165 27 _ 175 31 - 205 35 . 208 39 . 214 43 . 155 47 . 157 51 . 155 55 .

52 59 . 68 63 . 77 67 s 7771 . 41 75 .

779 I 27 83 . 1407 *

VAR 0336 NAKE-R'S FAHILY INCOHE

LOC 402 WIDTH 2

FREQ AGE . FREQ AGE . PREQ AGE 172 24 . 188 25 . 196 26

208 29 . 239 30 158 28 . 216 32 m 157 36 _ 246 40 _ 184 44 . 150 48 . 168 52 . 121 56 . 115 60 . 108 64 m

65 68 . 4172 . 37 76 . 58 00 .

984 . 388 I

204 33 . 174 34 163 37 . 216 38 106 41 s 183 42 238 43 I 164 46 156 49 . 199 50 124 53 . 114 54 107 57 . 80 58

57 61 . 113 62 107 65 s 64 66 105 69 m 113 70 25 73 . 72 74 57 77 . 23 78 10 81 . 21 82 16 85 . 21 86

3 90, .

REP 0336 ED=GE 97

DK 7 COL

DATA SET ID-'7225'

25-26

288 503

Q. 103, INTO YHICH OF THE GROUPS ON THIS CARD DID THE TOTAL INCOME FOR YOUR FAHILT FALL LAST YEAR (BEPOBE TAXES) . . . . ..-......................-.-.*.-...-..-.-...............

01. UNDER $1,000 02. $1,000 TO $1,999


677 03. $2,000 TO $2,999 973 04, $3,000 TO 33,999

1226 05. $4,000 TO $4,999 1322 06. $5,000 TO $5,999

849 07, $6,000 TO $6,999 613 08. 67,000 TO 97,999 598 09. $8,000 TO $9,999 532 10. $10,000 TO 514.999 332 11. $15,000 OR OVER

(CONTINUED) .w1......1.

PAGE 156

280 97. DK, REFUSED

VAR 0337 REP 0337 DATA SET ID-172251 NAME-R'S SEX NO HISSING DATA CODES


Q. 104. SEX . . . . . . -..I*.

4067 1. HALE 4126 2. PEIALE

QUESTIONNAIRE SECTION

-159-

QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY

1.

3a.

3b.

4a.

4b.

5.

You hear a lot about the problems facing the country today and we are interested in getting opinions on these from you. In your opinion, what problems facing the country would you say are most important? (open-ended question)

If any problems mentioned in 9.1 - ask Q.2. For all others go to Q.3.

2a. Which one of these problems is of special concern to you personally? (open-ended question)

2b. In what ways does this concern you? (open-ended question)

As you know, on November 8th we had a federal election. People are talking a lot about this election and the way it turned out. Do you happen to have any feelings about how the election turned out? (open-ended question)

Can you tell me something more about why you feel that way? (open- ended question)

Thinking now of the most important FEDERAL GOVERNMENT..........[] problems facing Canada today, which PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS......[] government would you say handles BOTH HANDLE THEM............[] most of these, the federal govern- NEITHER.....................[] ment in Ottawa or the provincial DON'T KNOW..................[] governments?

Are any provincial governments YES [] NO [] r-l

DON'T KNOW [1 I I more powerful than others? I I

GO TO QUESTION 5

If Yes

4c. Which one or ones?

As far as you are concerned personally, which government is more important in affecting how you and your family get on? The one in Ottawa or the one in this province?

NEWFOUNDLAND................[ ] v 14 PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND........[ ] v 15 NOVA SCOTIA.................[ ] V 16 NEW BRUNSWICK...............[ ] v 17 QUEBEC......................[ ] v 18 ONTARIO.....................[ ] v 19 MANITOBA....................[ ] v 20 SASKATCHEWAN................[ ] v 21 ALBERTA.....................[ ] v 22 BRITISH COLUMBIA............[ ] V 23

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT..........[ ] PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT ..... ..[ ] BOTH IMPORTANT..............[ ] NEITHER.....................[ ] DON'T KNOW..................[ ]

V 8

v 9

v 10

v 11

v 12

v 13

V 24


6. During this election, people had different opinions about the issues which were important in the campaign. We are interested in hearing your opinion about what you thought were the most important issues in the last election. (open-ended question)

Now I am going to read you some of the issues which were discussed in the last election campaign and I would like you to tell me, for each issue how important it was to you personally in helping you decide how to vote.

7a.

7b.

7c.

7d.

7e.

7f.

7g.

Take social welfare issues, like health insurance and pensions. How important was that to you in deciding how to vote? Very important, fairly important, or not too important?

VERY IMPORTANT...........[ ] FAIRLY IMPORTANT.........[ ] NOT TOO IMPORTANT........] ] DON'T RNOW...............[ ]

, How about issues concerning the econo- VERY IMPORTANT...........[ ] my, such as unemployment, government FAIRLY IMPORTANT.........] ] planning for the future, foreign NOT TOO IMPORTANT........[ ] trade? DON'T RNOW...............[ ]

Now think of the issue of relations between French and English-speaking Canadians. Was this very important, fairly important, or not too important to you?

VERY IMPORTANT...........[ ] FAIRLY IMPORTANT.........[ ] NOT TOO IMPORTANT........[ ] DON'T KNOW...............] ]

In deciding how to vote, did you feel VERY IMPORTANT...........[ ] that the Canadian Flag issue was very FAIRLY IMPORTANT.........[ ] important, fairly important, or not NOT TOO IMPORTANT........] ] too important? DON'T KNOW...............] ]

What about the unity of Canada? Was VERY IMPORTANT...........[ ] this an issue which you found very FAIRLY IMPORTANT.........[ ] important, fairly important, or not NOT TOO IMPORTANT........[ ] too important? DON'T KNOW...............[ ]

Was corruption in government an is- VERY IMPORTANT...........[ ] sue which you found very important, FAIRLY IMPORTANT.........] ] fairly important, or not too impor- NOT TOO IMPORTANT........] ] tant? DON'T KNOW...............[ ]

How important did you find the issue of whether Canada should have a majority government?

VERY IMPORTANT...........] ] FAIRLY IMPORTANT.........1 ] NOT TOO IMPORTANT........] I DON'T RNOW...............[ ]

V 25

V 26

V 27

V 28

v 29

v 30

v 31

V 32


7h. Did the issue of strong leadership VERY IMPORTANT...........[ ] v 33 in Ottawa strike you as being very FAIRLY IMPORTANT.........[ ] important, fairly important, or not NOT TOO IMPORTANT........I 1 too important? DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii

8. Now I have a different kind of question. In recent elections, the political party which has formed the government in Ottawa has not had a majority of the seats in Parliament. Do you think it makes a great deal of difference, some difference, or not much difference whether the party forming the government has a majority of the seats or not?

9. If you believed that a party could form a majority government, but you did not ordinarily vote for that party, how likely would you be to vote for it in order to have a majority government? Very likely, somewhat likely, or not at all likely?

MAJORITY GOVERNMENT MAKES A GREAT DEAL OF DIFFERENCE .... ..[

MAKES SOME DIFFERENCE .......... ..[ MAKES NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE ...... ..I DON'T KNOW ..................... ..[

; v 34

I I

VERY LIKELY TO VOTE FOR OTHER PARTY ................... [I v 35

SOMEWHAT LIKELY..................[ ] NOT AT ALL LIKELY................[ ] DON'T KNOW ....................... [I

10. How much interest do you generally A GOOD DEAL ............ ..[ 1 V 36 have in what is going on in poli- SOME ..................... [] tics - a good deal, some, or not NOT MUCH.................[ ] much? DON'T KNOW ............... [I

Now I'd like to talk about some of the different ideas people have about the government in Ottawa and see how you feel about them. These opinions don't refer to any political party in particular, but just to the government in general. For example:

lla. Do you think that quite a few of the QUITE A FEW..............[ ] v 37 people running the government are a NOT VERY MANY............[ ] little crooked - not very many are HARDLY ANY ............... crooked, or do you think hardly any DON'T KNOW ............... of them are crooked?

lib. Do you think that people in the goaern- A LOT....................[ ] V 38 ment waste a lot of the money we pay in SOME.....................[ ] taxes, waste some of it, or don't waste NOT MUCH.................[ ] very much of it? DON'T KNOW ............... []

-162-


llc. How much of the time do you think you can trust the government in Ottawa to do what is right - just about always, most of the time, or only some of the time?

ALWAYS...................[ ] MOST OF THE TIME.........[ ] SOME OF THE TIME.........[ ] DON'T KNOW...............[ ]

lld. Do you think that all people who are high in government give everyone a fair break, whether they are big shots or just ordinary people, or do you think some of them pay more attention to what the big interests want?

GIVE EVERYONE A FAIR BRFAK...............[]

PAY ATTENTION TO BIG SHOTS................[]

DON'T KNOW.................[]

v 39

v 40

lie. Do you feel that almost all of the people running the government are smart people who usually know what they are doing, or do you think that quite a few of them don't seem to know what they are doing?

ALL KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING................[]

QUITE A FEW DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING......[]

DON'T KNOW.................[]

v 41

Here are some other kinds of opinions that you hear different people giving. For these I'd just like you to tell me offhand whether you agree or disagree.

12a. Voting is the only way that people like me can have any say about how the government runs things. Do you agree or disagree?

12b. I don't think that the government AGREE .................. ..[ 1 cares much what people like me DISAGREE.................[ ] think. DON'T KNOW...............[ ]

12~. Sometimes politics and government seem so complicated that a person like me can't really understand what's going on.

12d. People like me don't have any say about what the government does.

12e. Generally, those elected to parliament soon lose touch with the people.

AGREE....................~ ] DISAGREE.................[ ] DON'T KNOW...............[ ]

AGREE....................[ ] DISACREE.................[ ] DON'T KNOW...............[ ]

AGREE....................[ ] DISAGREE.................~ ] DON'T KNOW...............[ ]

AGREE .................... [I DISAGREE.................[ ] DON'T KNOW...............[ ]

V 42

v 43

v 44

v 45

v 46

-163-


12f.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17a.

18.

Intellectuals take up too large a position in our governments.

We are also interested in how people are getting along financially these days. As far as you and your family are concerned, would you say that you are pretty well satisfied, more or less satisfied, or not at all satisfied about the way you are getting along?

During the last few years, has your GETTING BETTER...............[ ] v 49 financial situation been getting GETTING WORSE ................ [I better, getting worse, or has it STAYED THE SAME .............. [] stayed the same? DON'T KNOW ................... []

In general, would you say that the employment situation of you and your family now looks much better, somewhat better, somewhat worse, or much worse than it did two or three years ago?

Now looking ahead and thinking about the next few years, do you expect your financial situation will stay about the way it is now, get better, or get worse?

Do you think that the way the election turned out will make any difference in how well off you are?

If Yes

17b. Will it make things better or worse?

Have you personally been unem- YES..........................~ ] v 54 ployed and looking for work NO ........................... during the past year? DON'T KNOW ................... t;

AGREE .................... [] v 47 DISAGREE ................. [] DON'T KNOW ............... []

PRETTY WELL SATISFIED........[ ] v 48 MORE OR LESS SATISFIED.......[ ] NOT AT ALL SATISFIED.........[ ] DON'T KNOW ................... [I

MUCH BETTER .................. [I v 50 SOMEWHAT BETTER..............[ ] ABOUT THE SAME ............... [I SOMEWHAT WORSE ............... [] MUCH WORSE...................[ ] NOT APPLICABLE ............... [] DON'T KNOW ................... []

STAY ABOUT THE SAME..........[ ] v 51 GET BETTER...................1 ] GET WORSE .................... [I DON'T KNOW ................... [I

YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...*.. [I V 52

NO .......................... DON'T KNOW ..................

BETTER ....................... [] v 53 WORSE ........................ [] DON'T KNOW ................... []

-164-


19. Has anyone in your family been YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [] unemployed and looking for work NO . . . . . . . ..*................. during the past year? DON'T KNOW *....*............. :;

20. What about the last three years? YES . ..I...................... During that time, have you or NO......... . . . . . ..*.......... f3 any member of your family been DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . El unemployed and looking for work?

21a. Do you think there are any pro- YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vinces or regions of Canada which NO . . . ..*..................... I3 are better off than the others? DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I

If Yes

21b. Which ones?

(open-ended question) V 58 - V 70

NEWFOUNDLAND PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND

NOVA SCOTIA NEW BRUNSWICK

QUEBEC ONTARIO

MANITOBA SASKATCHEWAN

ALBERTA BRITISH COLUMBIA

MARITIMEs PRAIRIES

SPECIFIC REGIONS

22a. Do you think there are any provinces or regions of Canada which are worse off than the others?

YES....... NO........ DON'T KNOW

If Yes

22b. Which ones?

(open-ended question) V 72 - V 84

NEWFOUNDLAND PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND

NOVA SCOTIA NEW BRUNSWICK

QUEBEC ONTARIO

MANITOBA SASKATCHEWAN

ALBERTA (CON'T)

v 55

V 56

v 57

V 58 v 59 V 60 V 61 V 62 V 63 V 64 V 65 v 66 V 67 v 68 V 69 v 70

v 71

V 72 v 73 v 74 v 75 V 76 v 77 V 78 v 79 V 80

-165-


BRITISH COLUMBIA V 81 MARITIMES V 82

PRAIRIES V 83 SPECIFIC REGIONS V 84

If respondent's province is not mentioned in either Q.21b or Q.22b - ask 4.23. For all others - go to Q.24.

23. How do you feel about this BETTER OFF....................[] V 85 province? Do you think it WORSE OFF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . is better off than most, ABOUT AVERAGE................. t3 worse off, or about average? DON'T KNOW....................[]

24a. In which Canadian provinces do you think you might like to live?

24b. In which Canadian provinces would you definitely never want to live?

(a) (b) WOULD LIKE WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN TO LIVE IN

NEWFOUNDLAND.................[] V 86 [I V 96 PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND.........[] V 87 [I v 97 NOVA SCOTIA..................[] V 88 [I V 98 NEW BRUNSWICK . . ..*....a...... II V 89 [I v 99 QUEBEC.......................[] V 90 [] v 100

ONTARIO......................[] V 91 [] v 101 MANITOBA.....................[] V 92 [] v 102 SASKATCHEWAN.................[] V 93 [I v 103 ALBERTA......................[] V 94 [] v 104 BRITISH COLUMBIA.............[] V 95 [] v 105

DON'T KNOW [] DON'T KNOW [] NONE []

25. Thinking now of the national leaders of the four main political parties, which part of the country do you think these men are closest to: the Maritimes, Quebec, Ontario, the Prairies or British Columbia?

;i Take Mr. Diefenbaker. Does he have more connection with the Mari- times, Quebec, Ontario, the Prairies or British Columbia? What about Mr. Pearson? Mr. Douglas? Mr. Thompson? Mr. Caouette?

MORE CONNECTION WITH: DIEFENBAKER PEARSON DOUGLAS THOMPSON CAOUETTE

MARITIMES..............[] V 106 [] v 111 [] v 116 [I V 121 [I V 126 QUEBEC.................]] V 107 [] v 112 [] v 117 [] V 122 [I V 127 ONTARIO................[] V 108 [] v 113 [I V 118 [I V 123 [I V 128 PRAIRIES...............[] V 109 [] v 114 [] v 119 [] v 124 [I V 129 BRITISH COLUMBIA.......[] V 110 [] v 115 [] V 120 [] V 125 [I V 130

ALL THE SAME...........[] [I [I DON'T KNOW.............[] [I [I

-166-


26. Which political figure today do you think would make the best Prime Minister for Canada? (open-ended question)

27. One of the things we are interested in is the differences which exist between our federal political parties. Considering everything the parties stand for, would you say that there is a good deal of difference between the parties, some difference, or not much difference?

GOOD DEAL OF DIFFERENCE.......[ SOME DIFFERENCE . ..*......,.... NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE........... F DON'T KNOW....................[

28a. Which of our federal political parties do you feel are most alike?

(open-ended question)

28b. Which of our federal political parties are least alike?


29. In your opinion, do you think it GREAT DEAL .................. ..I makes a great deal of difference, SOME DIFFERENCE ............. ..[ some difference, or no difference, NO DIFFERENCE ............... ..I which political party runs this DON'T KNOW .................... [ country?

3’ 1 J

(SHOW CARD) Now I have a different kind of question for you. I'm going to show you some word pairs. Each pair is separated by seven boxes like this. If you think that the particular political party is very well known, you would put a check mark in the box on the left end of the scale. If you feel it is not known at all, you would check the box on the right end of the scale. Or you might rate it somewhere between these two extremes.

(HAND RATING SHEETS)

30a. First, we'll start with an imaginary political party - the one you would consider the ideal for Canada.

The Ideal Party

Out of date [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Modern V 136 Competent [I [J [I [I [I 13 [I Incompetent V 137

Powerful [I 11 [I [I [I [I [I Weak V 138 Foolish [I [I II [I [I Cl [I Wise V 139

For the middle class [I r1 [I [I [I [I [I For the working class V United [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Split V 141

Bad [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Good V 142 Left wing [I 11 [I [I [I [I [I Right wing V 143

Strong-minded [I [l [I [I [I Cl [l Weak-minded V 144 Honest [I [I II [I [I [I II Dishonest V 145

Dull [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Exciting V 146 Young [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Old V 147

Slow [I [I 11 t1 11 [I [I Fast V 148

v 131

V 132

v 133

v 134

v 135

V 136-

v 213

V 136-

v 148

140

-167-


30b. Now you can go on to each of Canada's federal parties. v 149-

v 213

Out of date

Competent

Powerful

Foolish

For the middle class

United

Bad

Left wing

Strong-minded

Honest

Dull

Young

Slow

Out of date

Competent

Powerful

Foolish


United

Bad

Left wing

Strong-minded

Honest

Dull

Young

Slow

Liberal Pa=

11 II II II 11 II II Modern V 149

II II II 11 [I II II Incompetent V 150

[I II [I El [I [I [I Weak V 151

[I [I [I 11 [I [I [I Wise V 152

1 [I [I [I [I [I [I 1 [I [I II [I [I [I 1 [I [I [I [I [I [I 1 [I [I [I [I [I [I I [I [I [I [I [I [I 1 [I [I [I [I [I [I 1 [I El [I [I [I [I 1 [I [I [I [I [I [I 1 [I El [I [I II [I

Conservative Party

11 [I [I [I [I [I [I [I II [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I II [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I II [I [I [I [I [I [I II [I [I [I [I II [I [I [I [I [I II [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I II [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I [I II [I [I [I [I [I El [I [I [I [I [I

For the working class V 153

Split v 154

Good V 155

Right wing V 156

Weak-minded V 157

Dishonest V 158

Exciting V 159

Old V 160

Fast V 161

Modern V 162

Incompetent V 163

Weak V 164

Wise V 165

For the working class V 166

Split V 167

Good V 168

Right wing V 169

Weak-minded V 170

Dishonest V 171

Exciting V 172

Old V 173

Fast V 174

-168-


Out of date

Competent

Powerful

Foolish


United

Bad

Left wing

Strong-minded

Honest

Dull

Young

Slow

New Democratic Party

[J IJ II fl II II II Modern V 175

II II II II II II [I Incompetent V 176

[1 [I II II 11 [I 11 Weak V 177

[I 11 11 r1 El [I [I Wise V 178

[I II 13 II [I 11 [I For the working class V 179

[I [I El [I II El [I Split V 180

[I [I [I [I [I [I [I Good V 181

[I [I [I [I [I [I [I Right wing V 182

[I [I [I [I [I [I [I Weak-minded V 183

[I [I Zl [I [I [I [I Dishonest V 184

[I II [I [I [I [I [I Exciting V 185

[I [I [I [I [I II [I Old V 186

[I II [I [I [I [I [I Fast V 187

Social Credit Party Led By Mr. Thompson

Out of date [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Modern V 188

Competent [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Incompetent V 189

Powerful [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Weak V 190

Foolish [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Wise V 191

For the middle class [I [I [I [I [I [I [I For the working class V 192

United [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Split V 193

Bad [I [I [I [I El [I [I Good V 194

Left wing [I [I II 11 II [I [I Right wing V 195

Strong-minded [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Weak-minded V 196

Honest [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Dishonest V 197

Dull [I [I 11 [I [I [I [I Exciting V 198

Young [I [I [I [I [I 11 [I Old V 199

Slow [I [I [I [I t1 [I [I Fast V 200

-169-


Mr. Caouette's Creditiste Party

Out of date [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Modern V 201

Competent [I [I II [I [I [I [I Incompetent V 202

Powerful [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Weak V 203

Foolish II [I [I [I [I [I [I Wise V 204

For the middle class [I [I [I 11 [I [I [I For the working class V 205

United II [I [I [I [I II [I Split V 206

Bad [I II [I [I [I [I [I Good V 207

Left wing II II [I [I [I [I [I Right wing V 208

Strong-minded [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Weak-minded V 209

Honest [I [I El II [I [I [I Dishonest V 210

Dull [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Exciting V 211

Young [I [I [I [I [I II II Old V 212

Slow [I [I El 11 [I [I [I Fast V 213

We've talked about the parties. I'd also like your opinions of the Members of Parliament which each of the parties have sent to Ottawa in the last few years. You may not know too much about them, but just give me your general impression of the job they have been doing.

3la. Let's start with the Liberal Mem- PRETTY GOOD...................[ ] V 214 bers of Parliament. How would you so-so ......................... [I rate the job they have been doing - NOT GOOD......................[ ] pretty good, just so-so, or not DON'T KNOW....................[ ] good at all?

31b. How about the Conservative Members PRETTY GOOD ................. ..[ I v 215 of Parliament? Have they been so-so ......................... [] pretty good, so-so, or not good NOT GOOD ...................... [I at all? DON'T KNOW .................... []

31~. What about the NDP Members of Par- PRETTY GOOD ................... [] V 216 liament? HOW would you rate them? so-so .........................

NOT GOOD ...................... t; DON'T RNOW....................[ ]

31d. And how about the Social Credit Members of Parliament following Mr. Thompson?

PRETTY GOOD ................... [] V 217 so-SO.........................[ 1 NOT GOOD......................1 ] DON'T RNOW....................[ ]

-170-


31e. And finally, what about the Caouette PRETTY GOOD..................[ ] group of Social Credit Members of so-so ........................ Parliament? NOT GOOD ..................... ;;

DON'T KNOW ................. *.[I

Ask questions 32 and 33 only in Quebec. For all others? Go to 4.34.

Now I'm going to ask you two questions about the Social Credit Party led by Mr. Caouette.

32. Do you personally feel that, in the last few years, oh the whole, the Social Credit Party in Ottawa has done a much better job, a somewhat better job, about the same, a somewhat worse job, or a much worse job than the other parties?

33. What chances do you think the Social Credit Party has to become the party in power in Ottawa in the next ten years: a very good chance, fairly good chance, not too much of a chance or no chance at all?

Ask everyone

34. Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as Conservative, Liberal, Social Credit, Creditiste, NDP, Union Nationale or what?

MUCH BETTER..................[ ] SOMEWHAT BETTER..............[ ] ABOUT THE SAME ............. ..[ 1 SOMEWHAT WORSE...............[ ] MUCH WORSE...................1 ] DON'T KNOW ................... [I

VERY GOOD .................... [I FAIRLY GOOD ................. .[I NOT TOO MUCH CHANCE..........[ ] NO CHANCE .................... [J DON'T KNOW...................[ ]

CONSERVATIVE ................. [I LIBERAL ...................... [I SOCIAL CREDIT................[ ] CREDITISTE ................. ..[ I NDP .......................... [I UNION NATIONALE..............[ ] OTHER........................1 ]

v 218

v 221

NO PARTY ................... DON'T KNOW .................

If some party identification chosen, ask questions 35, 36, 37. If no party identification, ask question 38.

For identifiers

35. HOW strongly (STATE NAME OF VERY STRONGLY................]] v 222 CHOSEN PARTY) do you gener- FAIRLY STRONGLY..............[] ally feel - very strongly, NOT VERY STRONGLY............[] fairly strongly, or not very DON'T KNOW...................[] strongly?

-171-


For identifiers

36a. Was there ever a time when you thought of yourself as closest to any other party in Canada?

YES .......................... [I V 223

NO ......................... DON'T KNOW ................. r-l

[] GO TO [I Q.37a

If Yes

36b. Which party was that? CONSERVATIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I V 223 LIBERAL........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [] NDP . ..*......* . . . . . . . * . . . . . . . [] SOCIAL CREDIT . . . . . ...* . . . . . ..[I CREDITISTE...................[] OTHER . . . . ..*................. [I

36~. When did you change from that party to your present one? V 233 (open-ended question)

36d. What was the main thing that made you change?


V 234

For identifiers

37a. When you say you are a (STATE NATIONAL ONLY..... NAME OF CHOSEN PARTY) are you thinking of national politics. politics here in this-province, or both? PROVINCIAL ONLY...

37b.

BOTH .............. DON'T KNOW ........

If national only

j [] ASK 37b THEN GO TO Q.39

V I !

/ [] ASK 37c THEN GO 2

TO Q.39 j f

I

t3 GO TO 4.39

CONSERVATIVE ................. [] v 225 LIBERAL......................[ ] NDP .......................... SOCIAL CREDIT ................ t; CREDITISTE ................... [I UNION NATIONALE .............. [I OTHER ........................ [] NO PARTY.....................] ] DON'T KNOW ................... [I

-172-


If provincial only

Well, how about in national politics? How do you think of yourself?

CONSERVATIVE.................[ ] LIBERAL ...................... [I NDP .......................... SOCIAL CREDIT ................ ;z CREDITISTE ................... [I OTHER ........................ [I NO PARTY ..................... [I DON'T KNOW ................... [I

GO TO QUESTION 39 1

For non-identifiers

38a. Well, do you generally think YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..a. r1 of yourself as a little closer to one of the parties NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . than the others? DON'T KNOW..................

If yes, feels closer

38b. Which party is that?

38~. When you say you feel closer to (NAME PARTY IN Q.38b), are you thinking of national politics , politics here in the province or both?

v 226

CONSERVATIVE ................. [I ; LIBERAL ...................... [I NDP .......................... SOCIAL CREDIT ................ t; OTHER ........................ []

If national only

38d. Well how about politics here in (NAME PROVINCE)? To which party do you generally feel closer?

NATIONAL ONLY.... I

[] ASK 38d THEN GO TO 38f V

PROVINCIAL ONLY.. [] ASK 38e THEN GO TO 38f 2 .7

BOTH . * . . . . . . . . . . .[11 DON'T KNOW....... []

I I

CONSERVATIVE ............... ..[ 1 V 229 LIBERAL ..... . ............... *[I SOCIAL CREDIT ................ [I CREDITISTE...................[ ] NDP .......................... UNION NATIONALE .............. :; OTHER ...................... ..[ 1 DON'T KNOW ................. ..[ I

-173-


If provincial only

38e. How about national CONSERVATIVE.................[ ] V 230 politics? To which LIBERAL......................[ ] party do you genera- SOCIAL CREDIT................[ ] lly feel closer? CREDITISTE...................[ ]

NDP..........................[ 1 OTHER ...................... ..[ I DON'T KXOW...................[ ]

38f. Was there ever a YES .......................... II time when you felt closer to any other NO ......................... party? DON'T KNOW .................

If Yes 2 3

38g. Which party CONSERVATIVE.................[ ] 1 was that? LIBERAL ...................... [I

NDP .......................... SOCIAL CREDIT ................ :; OTHER ........................ [I

38h. When did you change from feeling closer to that V 233 party? (open-ended question)

381. What was the main thing that made you change? V 234

(open-ended question) GO TO

El 9.39

If doesn't feel close in Q.38a

38j. Was there ever a time YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..*...... [I V 232 when you did think of yourself as closer to NO......................... one of the parties? DON'T KNOW.................

If Yes

38k. When did you move away from that party?


V 233

381. What was the main thing that made you move away from V 234 the party?


-174-


Ask everybody

39. If at this time you had to vote for one of the other federal parties, which one would be your second choice?

Ask everybody

40.

41.

42.

43.

Which of the federal parties today would you least want to vote for?

On the whole, which of the following is most important to you when you vote? The candidate running in your riding, the party itself, or the party's leader? (DO NOT READ LIST)

Suppose there was an election in which the party you favour ran a candidate in your riding whom you did not like or did not agree with. What would you be most likely to do? Vote for the candidate anyway? Consider another party's candidate? Or would you probably not vote at alL?

Suppose there was an election in which the party you prefer was in favour of some policy you did not like or did not agree with. What would you be most likely to do? Vote for the party's candidate anyway? Consider another party's candidate? Or would you probably not vote?

CONSERVATIVE ................. [I V 235 LIBERAL......................[ ] NDP .......................... SOCIAL CREDIT ................ ;3 CREDITISTE ................... [] OTHER........................[ ] NO SECOND CHOICE.............[ ] DON'T KNOW ................... II

CONSERVATIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..[I V 236 LIBERAL ...................... ij NDP .......................... [] SOCIAL CREDIT................[ ] CREDITISTE ................... OTHER ........................ f3 DON'T KNOW ................... []

PARTY........................[ ] V 237 LEADER ....................... [] CANDIDATE .................... PROGRAM ...................... :; PARTY AND LEADER EQUALLY.....[ ] PARTY AND PROGRAM EQUALLY....[ ] LEADER AND PROGRAM EQUALLY...[ ] CANDIDATE AM) PROGF%X.......[ ] CANDIDATE AND PARTY..........1 ] CANDIDATE AND LEADER.........[ ] DON'T KNOW ................... [I

CANDIDATE .................... v 238 OTHER PARTY .................. WON'T VOTE ................... DON'T KNOW ...................

CANDIDATE....................[ ] v 239 OTHER PARTY .................. [] WON'T VOTE ................... [I IT DEPENDS, QUALIFIED........[ ] DON'T KNOW...................[ ]

:

___ ..---- ------. ~

-175-


44. Do you remember, when you were growing up, whether your father was very much interested in politics, somewhat interested, or didn't he pay much attention to it?

45a. Did your father have any particular preference for one of the federal political parties when you were young?

VERY INTERESTED ..* . . . . . . . . . . . [] V 240 SOMEWHAT INTERESTED..........[] DID NOT PAY MUCH ATTENTION...[J

DID NOT LIVE WITH FATHER....

DON'T REMEMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I

YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..*....a.... [I NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..a

V

If Yes

45b. Which party was that? CONSERVATIVE.................[] LIBERAL . . . . . . . . . * . . . . . . . . . . . . [I CCF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SOCIAL CREDIT................ 13 OTHER (SPECIFY)

DON'T REMEMBER...............[] NOT CANADIAN PARTY..........

/ NAME OF PARTY: NAME OF COUNTRY:

46. When you were growing up, was your VERY INTERESTED..............[ ] mother very much interested in SOMEWHAT INTERESTED..........[ ]

2 4 1

V 242

politics, somewhat interested, or DID NOT PAY MUCH ATTENTION...[] didn't she pay much attention to DID NOT LIVE WITH MOTHER it? DON'T

47a. When you were young, did your mother have any preference for one of the federal political

YES........ . . . . . . . . . . ...*.... []

NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . parties? I

1 GO TO Q.48 I

If Yes

47b. Which party was that? CONSERVATIVE ................. [] LIBERAL......................[ ] CCF .......................... SOCIAL CREDIT ................

OTHER (SPECIFY) DON'T REMEMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I NOT CANADIAN PARTY . . * . . . . . . .j-m

-176-


48. Do you happen to remember the YES (ENTER NAME) V 244 name of the candidate who was elected to Parliament for this NO . . . . . . . . . . * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [] riding in the November 8th NOT SURE . . . . *...** . . . . . . . . . ..*...... [] election?

49. Do you happen (her) party?

to know his YES (ENTER PARTY) V 245

NO .................................. NOT SURE ............................

Consult card to see if respondent gave correct answers. If not, say:

Sometimes it's hard to remember these things but his name is

and his party is

50a. Have you ever read or heard YES . . . ..**..........**.............. [I anything about him (her)?

NOT HEARD ANYTHING . . . . . . . . . . . . *.... [I NOT SURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

r-----r

[I GO TO Q.51a

i

If Yes

50b. What was that? (open-ended question) V 247

V 246

51a. Do you happen to know whether IN PARLIAMENT, CORRECT..............[] V 248 he (she) was already in Parlia- IN PARLIAMENT, ment just before this election?

If in Parliament, correct

51b. Do you remember anything YES v 249 that (NAME MEMBER) has DID NOTHING........................ done for the people of DON'T REMEMBER this constituency?

If Yes

51~. What was that? (open-ended question) [NEVER CODED]

51d. Has he (she) ever done YES . . . . . . . . . . ..*...*................ V 250 anything for you or your family personally? DONE NOTHING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

-177-


If Yes

51e. What was that? (open-ended question) [NEVER CODED]

52a. Do you remember the names of any other candidates running for -- election on November 8th from this riding? (FOR EACH NAME MEN- TIONED ASK Q.52b AND A.52~).

V 251

52b. What is his (her) party? V 252

52~. Have you read or heard anything about him (her)? V 253

cc> (a) (b) HEARD NOT HEARD NAME PARTY ABOUT ABOUT

V 251 V 252 II V 253 [I

[I II

53. In federal elections since you have VOTED IN ALL.................[] V 254 been old enough to vote in Canada, VOTED IN MOST................]] would you say that you have voted VOTED IN SOME .,........*..... [I in all of them, most of them, some VOTED IN NONE of them, or none of them? DON'T

If respondent has ever voted in federal election - ask Q.54a. For all others - go to Q.55.

54a. Have you always voted for the same paw, or have you voted for different parties?

If same party

54b. Which party is that?

55. In provincial elections since you have been old enough to vote, would you say that you have voted in all of them, most of them, some of them, or none of them?

VOTED FOR SAME PARTY.........[] V 255 VOTED FOR DIFFERENT PARTY...

CONSERVATIVE ................. v 256 LIBERAL ...................... NDP .......................... SOCIAL CREDIT ................ r; OTHER ........................ [I

VOTED IN ALL.................[ ] V 257 VOTED IN MOST .............. ..t 1 VOTED IN SOME ................ ij VOTED IN NONE ............... . []IN QUEBEC: 1

GO TO Q.59a DON'T REMEMBER.............. [IALL OTHERS:

GO TO Q.57a

-178-


If respondent has ever voted in provincial election - ask 4.56

56a. In provincial elections, have you VOTED FOR SAME PARTY.........[ ] V 258 always voted for the same party, VOTED FOR DIFFERENT or have you voted for different PARTIES .................. [] GO TO parties? /--zJ

If same party

56b. Which party is that? CONSERVATIVE.................[ ] v 259 LIBERAL ...................... [I NDP .......................... [I SOCIAL CREDIT................] ] UNION NATIONALE .............. II OTHER........................] ]

Ask all except Quebec - Quebec go to Q.59a

57a. The last federal election before the one in November was in 1963. Do you remember for sure whether or not you voted in that election?

YES, VOTED [] NO, DID NOT VOTE

If Voted 2 6

57b. Which party did you vote for? CONSERVATIVE.................[] 1 LIBERAL......................[] NDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..*.......... [I MR. THOMPSON'S SOCIAL

CREDIT....................[] MR. CAOUETTE'S SOCIAL

CREDIT . . . . . ..*............ [I OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I DON'T REMEMBER...............11 REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..[I

58a. In talking to people about this past November election, we find that a lot of people weren't able to vote because they were sick, or didn't have time, or had some other reason for not voting. How about you? Did you vote this time or did something keep you from voting?

YES, VOTED [] NO, DID NOT VOTE [] / GOTOQ.641 V

If Voted 2 6

58b. For which party did you vote? CONSERVATIVE.................[] 2 LIBERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * . . . . . ..[I NDP .*........................ SOCIAL CREDIT................ I OTHER........................[] DON'T REMEMBER...............[] REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..[I

-179-


58~. When did you decide how you were going to vote?


58d. Was it an easy decision or not? V 264

EASY DECISION /,j NOT AN EASY DECISION []

V 263

If not easy decision

58e. Why not? (open-ended question) V 265

58f. Did you happen to bring along anything - like a postcard - when you V 266 went to vote, in order to help you remember who the candidates were?

YES .......................... NO ........................... t3 DON'T REMEMBER ............... [J

For respondents living in Quebec, ask 4.59, 60, 61. For all others go to 4.62.

Quebec only

59a. In the last three federal elections - in 1962, 1963, and November 8th of this/last year, Mr. Caouette's Social Credit Party obtained a large share of the Quebec vote. We would like to know if you voted Social Credit in any of these elections. Your answers are of course completely confidential.

Did you happen to vote for the Social Credit candidate in the 1962 federal election - the first one in which Mr. Caouette's party did so well?

YES .......................... [I NO ........................... DON'T REMEMBER ............... t3 REFUSED......................[ 1 V

2

59b. Which party did you vote for? CONSERVATIVE ................. [I : LIBERAL ..................... .[I NDP .......................... OTHER ........................ t3 DON'T RFKZMBER ............... [I REFUSED ...................... [I

-180-


Quebec only

60a. Did you happen to vote for the Social Credit candidate in the federal election in 1963, the one in which Mr. Pearson's government was elected?

YES ......................... NO .......................... 13 DON'T REMEMBER .............. [J REFUSED ..................... [I v

2 6

60b. Which party did you vote for? CONSERVATIVE .............. ..[ 1 1 LIBERAL.....................[ ] NDP.........................[ ] OTHER ....................... [J DON'T REMEMBER .............. [] REFUSED.....................[ ]

Quebec only

61a. How about the election on November 8th. Did you vote this time or did something keep you from voting?

YES, VOTED [] NO, DID NOT VOTE pY5zciq

V If Yes Voted

61b. Did you vote Social Credit? YES.........................[] 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DON'T REMEMBER *............. :3

6 REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...*... []

2 If No

61~. Which party did you vote for? CONSERVATIVE * *....,......... [I LIBERAL . . . ..I............... [I NDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OTHER .* . . . . . ..*............. :; DON'T REXGIBER . . ..*..*...... [I REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . []

61d. When did you decide how you were going to vote?


V 263

61e. Was it an easy decision or not? V 264

EASY DECISION NOT EASY DECISION []

-181-


If not easy decision

61f. Why not? (open-ended question)

61g. Did you happen to bring anything - like a postcard - when you went to vote, in order to help you remember who the candidates were?

Ask everybody whose vote in 1963 (Q.57b) - bet) was different from their vote in 1965 _.

YES........................[] NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DON'T REZMEMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . . :3

except Quebec, Q.60b) - Que- (Q.58b) - except Quebec,

Q.blc) - Quebec). If same in both elections or did not vote in both elections - go to 4.63.

62. 1 notice that you change your vote from 1963 to 1965. Was there any special reason for changing the party you voted for?


Ask of those who voted in November election - if did not vote go to 4.64.

63. Now about your vote in the November election, was there any special reason for voting the way you did?


64. NOW let me end this discussion of how you voted with one more question, this time on provincial politics. For which party did you happen to vote in the last provincial election?

65. While most people think it is important to vote in all elections it isn't always possible to do so. If it were necessary to make a choice, in which kind of election would you say it was most important to vote? Local elections, national elections, or provincial ones? (DO NOT READ LIST)

DID NOT VOTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VOTED FOR: CONSERVATIVE....[]

LIBERAL . . . . . . . . . [I mP/CCF.........[l SOCIAL CREDIT...[] UNION NATIONALE.[] OTHER...........[] DON'T REMEMBER..[] REFUSED . . . . . . . . . [I

NATIONAL ELECTIONS.........[ ] PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS.......[ ] LOCAL ELECTIONS............[ ] NATIONAL AND PROVINCIAL....[ ] NATIONAL AND LOCAL.........[ ] PROVINCIAL AND LOCAL.......[ I ALL EQUALLY .............. ..r I CAN'T CHOOSE...............~ ]

V 265

V 266

V 267

V 268

V 269

V 270

-182-


Now I'm going to ask you about some things which people do that help a party or candidate win an election. I wonder if you could tell me whether you did any of these things during the campaign for the Novem- ber election.

66a. Did you attend any political meetings or gatherings during the

67.

68.

69.

70.

71.

7.2.

campaign?

YES, ATTENDED MEETINGS [] NO, DID NOT ATTEND

If Yes

66b. How many would you say you ATTENDED: STATE NUMBER went to?

DON'T REMEMBER .* . . . . . . . . *.*...[I

Did you read any party leaflets YES ...................... ..[ 1 or reports of election speeches NO.........................[ ] during the campaign? DON'T REMEMBER ............. [I

Did any of the parties call at your home during the election campaign?

Did you personally help one of the parties or a candidate? (For example, by canvassing, addressing pamphlets.)

Did you, on your own, talk to any people and try to show them why they should vote for one of the parties or candidates?

Do you belong to any political club YES, BELONG ................ [I or organization? NO ......................... [I

This year, did you hear or read anything about a federal political party or candidate having a drive, a dinner, or some other affair to raise money for campaign expenses?

NO PARTY CALLED............11 CALLED BY: CONSERVATIVES...[]

LIBERALS . . . . . . ..[I NDP . . . . . . . . . ..*.[I SOCIAL CREDIT...[] OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . [I DON'T REMEMBER..[] DON'T KNOW......[]

YES, HELPED................1 ] NO ......................... []

TALKED TO OTHERS...........[ ] DID NOT .................... [I DON'T REMEMBER ............. [I

HEARD OF MONEY RAISING.....[] DID NOT....................[] DON'T REMEMBER HEARING OF

MONEY RAISING...........[]

V 271

V 272

v 273

V 274 V 275 V 276 V 277 V 278 v 279

V 280

V 281

V 282

V 283

-183-


73. Did you, yourself, ask anybody to YES, ASKED FOR give money to help pay the costs CONTRIBUTION............[] V 284 during the November election NO, DID NOT................[] campaign of a candidate or poli- DON'T REMEMBER.............[] tical party?

74a. During this last year, were you or any member of your household V 285 asked to give money, buy tickets, or otherwise contribute financially to help pay the campaign expenses of a political party or candidate?

YES [I NO iGE\

If Yes

74b. Were you, yourself, asked or RESPONDENT WAS NOT ASKED...]] V 286 was this some other member RESPONDENT WAS ASKED........]] of your household? FAMILY MEMBER WAS ASKED....[]

FAMILY MEMBER NOT ASKED....]] DON'T KNOW.................[]

If respondent was asked to give money, ask questions 75, 76, 77 - all others go to Q.78.

75. By which parties were you asked?

76. In what way were you approached when you were asked for money? By letter? By telephone? By someone in person? At a dinner or a meeting7

77a. Were you asked by someone you knew personally or by someone you didn't know?

CONSERVATIVE...............[ ] V 287 LIBERAL....................[ ] V 288 NDP........................[ I V 289 SOCIAL CREDIT..............[ ] v 290 OTHER......................] ] v 291 DON'T REMEMBER.............] ]

LETTER.....................[ ] v 292 TELEPHONE..................] ] IN PERSON..................[ ] AT A DINNER OR A MEETING...[ ] OTHER ...................... [I DON'T REMEMBER.............[ ]

CANVASSER KNOWN............[ ] V 293

CANVASSER NOT KNOWN .......

-184-


If Known

77b. How did you know him/her? CANVASSER WAS: v 293

RELATIVE ................. [I FRIEND ................... [I FELLOW WORKER,

BUSINESS COLLEAGUE......[ ] NEIGHBOUR ................ [I OTHER .................... [I DON'T REMEMBER...........[ ]

78a. Did you give money, buy tickets, YES, MADE CONTRIBUTION......[ ] or make other financial contri- NO, DID NOT MAKE butions to help a candidate or CONTRIBUTION ............ party pay campaign expenses for this last election? I V

If Yes

78b. To which party did you give? CONSERVATIVES ............. ..[ 1 LIBERALS....................[ ] NDP ....................... ..[ 1 SOCIAL CREDIT ............... [I OTHER ........... ..*.........[ 3

79a. As far as you know, did any other member of your household contribute to a candidate or party's campaign fund?

YES 11 NO [---i-ii GO ;I;,""‘ ';;I

79b. To which party did they give? CONSERVATIVES ............... [I LIBERALS .................... [I NDP ......................... [I SOCIAL CREDIT ............... [I CREDITISTE .................. [I OTHER ....................... [I DON'T KNOW PARlY............[ ] DON'T KNOW .................. [I

Ask only if did not make contribution in Q.78a

80. If you had been asked to make some WOULD HAVE MADE v 296 contribution to your favourite CONTRIBUTION.............[ ] party or a candidate you liked, WOULD NOT HAVE .............. [I would you have given money? DON'T KNOW/NOT SURE.........[ ]

2 9 4

V

2 9 5


81.

82.

83a.

84a.

84b.

84~.

89.

IN FAVOUR OF IT []

If in favour 1 83b. Why are you in favour?

AGAINST IT []

I [NEVER coDED]

83~. Why are you against it?

[NEVER CODED]

The amount of money it costs a political party to run an election campaign does not have to be made public at present. Should it be required that parties publish their expenses or not?

SHOULD PUBLISH.............[ ] v 300

SHOULD NOT ................. [I

DON'T KNOW ............... ..[ 1

Should parties be required to dis- YES........................[ ] v 301 close the names of their contri- NO ........................ .[I butors? DON'T KNOW ................. [I

Should parties be required to dis- YES........................[ 1 V 302 close the amounts given by each NO ......................... [I contributor? DON'T KNOW ................ .[I

Do you think the government should pay all, some or none of the costs of political campaigns?

ALL ...................... ..[ I v 303 SOME ....................... [I NONE ....................... [I DON'T KNOW.................1 ]

Which would you rather do to help GIVE MONEY.................[] v 297 your party or favourite candidate: GIVE TIME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I give money or give time? PREFER BOTH EQUALLY........[]

DON'T CARE TO DO EITHER....[] DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I

How do you feel about contributions GOOD THING FROM BUSINESS V 298 to political parties from organi- CORPORATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . [I rations like business corporations NOT A GOOD THING FROM or trade unions? Do you think it BUSINESS CORPORATIONS...[] is a good thing or not for our GOOD THING FROM TRADE parties to receive such contri- UNIONS . . . . . . ...* . . . . . . . . [I butions? NOT A GOOD THING FROM

TRADE UNIONS . ..* . . . . . . . . [I GOOD THING FROM BOTH.......[] NOT A GOOD THING FROM

EITHER .*. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . *..*..[I

Would you be against or in favour of allowing people to deduct from v 299 their income tax the money they give to parties and candidates, in the same way that they deduct money they give to charity?

:

-186-


86. Now I just have a few more ques- MARRIED .................... [I v 304 tions. Are you married, widowed, WIDOWED .................... [] separated, divorced, or are you SEPARATED .................. [I single? DIVORCED...................[ ]

SINGLE.....................[ ]

87. Who usually is your family's main RESPONDENT, WHO IS MALE HEAD v 305 wage earner? (INCLUDES SINGLE MAN)........[]

RESPONDENT'S HUSBAND..........[] RESPONDENT'S FATHER...........[] RESPONDENT'S FATHER-IN-LAW....[] RESPONDENT, WHO IS FEMALE

HEAD (INCLUDES SINGLE WOMAN).[] RESPONDENT'S WIFE.............[] OTHER MALE....................[] OTHER FEMALE..................11

88a. What is the main earner's (your) occupation?


v 306

Probe

What kind of work does/do (he/she/you) actually do?

88b. In what type of business does/do (he/she/you) work?

Probe

[NEVER CODED]

What does/do (he/she/you) do there?

89. How many years of school did you attend? YEARS v 307

90. If you had to pick one, which of UPPER CLASS................[ 1 v 308 the following five social classes UPPER-MIDDLE CLASS.........[ ] would you say you were in - upper MIDDLE CLASS...............[ ] class, upper-middle class, middle WORKING CLASS..............[ ] class, working class, or lower LOWER CLASS................[ ] class? THERE IS NO SUCH THING.....[ ]

DON'T KNOW.................[ ]

91. Would you mind telling of what ROMAN CATHOLIC ............. :;

v 309 religion you are? UNITED CHURCH ..............

ANGLICAN...................1 ] PRESBYTERIAN...............[ ] BAPTIST....................[ ] LUTHERAN ................... [I UKRAINIAN (GREEK) cATHoLIC.~] GREEK ORTHODOX.............[ ] JEWISH.....................] ] (CON'T)

-187-


OTHER PROTESTANT (STATE):

ALL OTHER (STATE):

NONE [J

If respondent names religion, ask Q.92. For others go to Q.93.

92. About how often do you go to AT LEAST WEEKLY............[] v 310 church? At least once a week, 2 OR 3 TIMES MONTHLY.......[] two or three times a month, ONCE A MONTH . . . . . . . . *......[I once a month, a few times a A FEW TIMES A YEAR OR LESS.[] year or less, never? NEVER - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I

93. Please tell me from what country BRITISH ISLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I v 311 most of your ancestors came? FRANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...*.... []

GERMANY . ..* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [J UKRAINE/RUSSIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I ITALY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [] NETHERLANDS . . . . . *.. . . . . . . . . [] POLAND ..*..*...*..* . . . . . . . . [I SCANDINAVIAN COUNTRIES.....[J HUNGARY . . . . . . ..*........... OTHER EUROPEAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . :3 ASIATIC COUNTRY............[] NORTH AMERICAN COUNTRY.....[] ALL OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I

94a. In what country were you born? CANADA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I G0 TO v

I Q.95

BRITISH ISLES .*...* . . . . . . . .[I 3

POLAND . ..* . . . . . . . . . ...*.... [] 1

RUSSIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..[] 2

GERMANY .*......,........... ITALY . . ..a*.... . . . ...*..... :3 NETHERLANDS ..* . . . . . . . . . . . . . [] HUNGARY . . . . . . *.... . . . . . . . . . [] OTHER EUROPEAN . . . . . . . . * ..I. [I UNITED STATES ..*........... [J ALL OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I

If respondent was born outside of Canada, ask Q.94b.

94b. In what year did you become an BETWEEN 1946 AND 1960......[] v 313 immigrant to Canada? BETWEEN 1939 AND 1945......[]

BEFORE 1939 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I

95. What language do you most often ENGLISH ..I................. v 314 speak at home? FRENCH . ..*. * *.............. r'3

OTHER (WHICH ONE?)

-188-


96. When you were growing up where did FARM(S) ..................... [] v 315 you live mostly, in a city or sub- VILLAGE(S) OR SMALL urb, in a village or small town, TOWN(S) .................. or on a farm? CITIES OR SUBURBS .......... .1'3

97a. Have you ever lived in any other Canadian province for more than six months?

YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [] V 316

NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

If Yes

97b. Which ones? NEWFOUNDLAND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [] v 317 PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND........[] V 318 NOVA SCOTIA . . . . . . . . . * . . . . . . . [I v 319 NEW BRUNSWICK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [] V 320 QUEBEC......................[] V 321 ONTARIO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I V 322 MANITOBA....................[] V 323 SASKATCHEWAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [] V 324 ALBERTA .* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * . . . . [I V 325 BRITISH COLUMBIA............[] V 326

98. Do you (or does the head of this BELONG TO: LABOUR UNION.....[] household) (CHECK REPLY To 4.87) TRADE ASSOCIATION[] belong to any of the following FARM ORGANIZATION[] groups : a labour union; a trade PROFESSIONAL association; a farm organization; ASSOCIATION....[] a professional association; any OTHER VOLUNTARY other associations, clubs, or ASSOCIATION....[] organizations? BELONGS TO NO ORGANIZATION..[]

DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . ** . . . . . . . [I

V 327 V 328 v 329

v 330

v 331

For respondents living in Quebec only, ask questions 99, 100, 101. For all others go to question 102.

Quebec Only

99. During the last seven days, have YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...* [I you visited other people at their NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I homes?

V 332

Quebec Only

100. During the last seven days, have other people visited you at your home?

YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...* [] NO . . . . ..*.e*................ [I

v 333

Quebec Only

101. During the last seven days, have YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I you been out with other people NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I somewhere else than at relatives' or friends' homes?

v 334

-189-


102. What is your age? YEARS v 335

Hand respondent card

103. Into which of the groups on this card did the total income for your family fall last year (before taxes)?

A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. 3. K.

UNDER $l.OOO............[ ] $1,000 TO $1.999........[ 1 $2,000 TO $2.999........[ 1 $3,000 TO $3.999........[ 1 $4,000 TO $4.999........[ 1 $5,000 TO $5.999........[ 1 $6,000 TO $6.999........[ 1 $7,000 TO $7.999........[ 1 $8,000 TO $9.999........[ 1 $10,000 TO $14.999......[ 1 $15,000 OR OVER.........[ 1 DON'T KNOW, REFUSED.....[ 1

(ESTIMATE)

104. Sex. MALE ........................ [I FmLE......................[ 1

V 336

v 337

Circle:

WRITE CLEARLY OR PRINT. GIVE INITIALS

Mr. Miss Mrs. Telephone No. NONE []

Mailing Address: Town: Prov. v5

DATE:

(INTERVIEWER'S SIGNATURE)

INTERVIEW ENDED AT A.M. [] P.M. []

canadian national election study, 1965

Documents