canada’s current process for switching prescription drugs … · canada that protect the...

1
STAGE I STAGE II STAGE III STAGE IV PRE-SUBMISSION / R&D PREPARED BY www.delsys.ca FEDERAL APPROVAL OF SWITCH SCHEDULING DECISION PROVINCIAL IMPLEMENTATION STAGE V CONSUMER ACCESS Product Launch Automatic Schedule 2 on the Regulations Respecting the terms and conditions for the sale of medications NAPRA’s policy establishes new non-prescription drugs automatically on Schedule I on the National Drug Schedules (Rx status) until a sponsor submits an application to NAPRA to review the schedule placement. Health Canada approval begins Innovators will continue preparing for product launch during the approval process Supplemental Abbreviated New Drug Submission (SANDS) If Decision is rejected, can return to NDSAC and NAPRA’s Executive Committee for review Chair of the Board of the Office of des professions reviews Comments and makes a decision Gazette 2 Publication for consultation Letter to Applicant Gazette 2 Publication, amendment in force SANDS Approval SANDS Evaluation NAPRA “SECOND ENTRY” NEWFOUNDLAND & LABRADOR BRITISH COLUMBIA* QUÉBEC BC College submits scheduling change pkg to BC Ministry of Health Professional Regulation & Oversight Division BC College Board Approval Professional Regulation & Oversight Division Ministerial Order in Council WTO International Notification NDSAC makes recommendation for schedule placement NAPRA Submission The provinces, through pharmacists, are able to set one of four conditions of sale for drugs. Schedule 1 drugs require a prescription in order to be dispensed by a pharmacist. Schedule 2 drugs do not require a prescription but require a pharmacist's intervention. Schedule 3 drugs do not require a prescription but must be sold from the professional products area in a pharmacy. Unscheduled drugs may be sold in any retail outlet. Review NAPRA decision to implement Review NAPRA decision to implement Office des professions Submission Review by stakeholders Drug Schedules are Amended National Product Launch Promotional Materials Retail Contracts Production Labelling Advertising Staggered Launches Confirmation of Executive Registrar Drug Schedules are Amended NAPRA Schedule by Reference Quebec Submission Review Review Bureau Recommendation Prescription Drug Status Committee Preparation of Notice and Final Signatures Public Posting of the Notice of Intent (NOI) Consultation Assessment of Comments Received Preparation of Final Notice Notification of Intent to Amend (NOIA) the Prescription Drug List (PDL) Acknowledgement Letter Supplemental New Drug Submission (SNDS) to Health Canada Final HC Decision to Switch Ingredient (Notice of Compliance issued) NAPRA Decision U N S C H E D U L E D ... S C H E D U L E 3 S C H E D U L E 2 S C H E D U L E 1 S C H E D U L E 2 S C H E D U L E 1 U N S C H E D U L E D ... S C H E D U L E 3 S C H E D U L E 2 S C H E D U L E 1 The Office des Professions du Québec consults with: • L’Institut national d’excellence en santé et en services sociaux • Collège des médecins du Québec • L’Ordre des médecins vétérinaires du Québec • l’Ordre des pharmaciens du Québec Board of Office des professions Decision BC College supports communications and implementation U N S C H E D U L E D ... Any Retail Outlet (*no standard timelines, up to 2 years) Production Labelling Advertising Promotional Materials Retail Contracts Planograms Market Research on Consumer Demand Develop Business Case New Research (i.e., actual use, label comprehension, & self-selection studies) Clinical Studies (i.e., safety, efficacy, chemistry & manufacturing data) Prepare Submission Package Identify Switch Candidate PROVINCIAL SCHEDULING Food & Drug Act Food & Drug Regulations LEGISLATION LEGISLATION LEGISLATION WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade Trade Agreements (NAFTA, TRIPS) NAPRA Bylaws/Policies Constitution Act NAPRA Policies/Bylaws Constitution Act Provincial Pharmacy Act (9 provinces) Provincial Pharmacy Act & Professional Code (QC) Natural Health Product Regulations Health Canada Guidelines Provincial Pharmacy Act (9 provinces) Provincial Pharmacy Act & Professional Code (QC) Agreement of Internal Trade Agreement on Internal Trade NAPRA Executive Committee Confirms Interim Schedule Ruling S C H E D U L E 2 Behind the Counter S C H E D U L E 3 Pharmacy Only S C H E D U L E 1 Prescription Only S C H E D U L E ? S C H E D U L E ? S C H E D U L E ? S C H E D U L E 1 Prescription Only OR DETAIL The NAPRA application usually begins after the Health Canada review has been completed. DETAIL With the innovator's plans to switch a product now public, "second entry" entities can begin preparing submissions for second entry products. “Second entry” entities can reference the innovator's label and thus take advantage of all the proprietary work done by the innovator, making the "second entry" entity’s pathway to market much shorter and simpler. DETAIL "Second entry" entities rely on the innovator to bear the costs and effort to complete the lengthy provincial approval and implementation process, adding to their competitive advantage. DETAIL Staggered product launches are a result of the different lengths of time and processes for implementing scheduling decisions in each province. Some companies may choose not to launch products in all provinces as a result of this unpredictability and delay. DETAIL Some pharmacy chains will not stock drugs until the scheduling decisions have been implemented in all provinces. This substantially delays a national product launch. DETAIL All provinces except Quebec participate in NAPRA's national drug scheduling program. The provinces of On, MN, AB, Ns, PEI, NB, SK all schedule by reference to the NAPRA program without any delay. DETAIL Most companies choose to switch new consumer health products in other international markets first. Unlike the US and UK, Canada offers no protection for proprietary research that is done to show new uses for existing products. Also, the lack of integration between the Federal product approval process and the provincial drug scheduling process creates delays that compound the lack of data protection for the innovator. 225/345 DAYS 7 DAYS 75 DAYS MIN. 7 DAYS 180 DAYS 225 DAYS UP TO 60 DAYS 7 DAYS 30 DAYS 30 DAYS 30 DAYS 60 DAYS UP TO 2 YEARS 45 DAYS 30 DAYS 3 MONTHS 14 DAYS Health Canada is the authority responsible for deciding whether or not to switch a product from prescription status to non-prescription status. They are making this decision without control over the conditions of sale (drug scheduling). Health Canada reviewers thus make their decisions on the assumption that a switch product could go directly to unscheduled status and be available in any retail outlet. 1 In Canada, prescription to non-prescription switches are ingredient-based. This means that all similar products containing that ingredient are also automatically switched. This requires Health Canada to give 6 months notification to international stakeholders as per the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade agreement. 3 After Health Canada approval, not all prescription to non-prescription switches are treated the same. By policy, Natural Health Products are excluded from the NAPRA scheduling process; however exceptions are made on an ad hoc basis. This adds uncertainty with respect to cost and timelines for innovators. 4 There is no legislative or regulatory framework governing NAPRA's role in drug scheduling. As a result there is no accountability to entities that are not members of NAPRA (e.g., submissions, sponsors, or the public). 5 The lack of a harmonized approach results in additional work, expense, and unpredictable delays for the innovator. 6 The authority for implementing NAPRA's drug scheduling decisions stems from the provincial Pharmacy Acts in all provinces but Quebec. These Acts are designed for the regulation of the profession of pharmacy, not the regulation of products. This results in enforcement issues, inappropriate regulatory instruments and oversight, lack of harmonization for products, etc.. 7 Quebec's consultation process is lengthy, has significant barriers to industry input and is not transparent or predictable. Switches are automatically directed to the most restrictive schedule and scheduling decisions are commonly more restrictive than those made by NAPRA, which creates inconsistent outcomes within Canada. 8 Due to the administrative complexities of the scheduling system in Canada, it is possible for a “second entry” product to be on the market before an innovator’s. 9 There are no data protection provisions in Canada that protect the information provided to Health Canada by innovators to support a switch. 2 1 3 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 7-12 MONTHS RESEARCH A Visual Thinking Consultancy CANADA’S CURRENT PROCESS FOR SWITCHING PRESCRIPTION DRUGS TO NON-PRESCRIPTION STATUS V.25.3.2016 KEY ISSUES

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CANADA’S CURRENT PROCESS FOR SWITCHING PRESCRIPTION DRUGS … · Canada that protect the information provided to Health Canada by innovators to support a switch. 2 7-12 MONTHS RESEARCH

STAGE I STAGE II STAGE III STAGE IV PRE-SUBMISSION / R&D

PREPARED BY

www.delsys.ca

FEDERAL APPROVAL OF SWITCH SCHEDULING DECISION PROVINCIAL IMPLEMENTATIONSTAGE V CONSUMER ACCESS

Product Launch

Automatic Schedule 2 on the Regulations Respecting the terms and conditions for the sale of medications

NAPRA’s policy establishes new non-prescription drugs automatically on Schedule I on the National Drug Schedules (Rx status) until a sponsor submits an application to NAPRA to review the schedule placement.

Health Canada approval begins

Innovators will continue preparing for product launch during the approval process

Supplemental Abbreviated New Drug Submission

(SANDS)

If Decision is rejected, can return to NDSAC and NAPRA’s Executive Committee for review

Chair of the Board of the Office of des professions reviews Comments

and makes a decision

Gazette 2 Publication for consultation

Letter to Applicant

Gazette 2 Publication, amendment in force

SANDS Approval

SANDS Evaluation

NAPRA

“SECOND ENTRY”

NEWFOUNDLAND & LABRADOR

BRITISH COLUMBIA*

QUÉBEC

BC College submits scheduling change pkg to BC Ministry of

Health

Professional Regulation & Oversight

Division

BC College Board

Approval

Professional Regulation &

Oversight Division

Ministerial Order in Council

WTO International Notification

NDSAC makes recommendation for schedule placement

NAPRA Submission

The provinces, through pharmacists, are able to set one of four conditions of sale for drugs.

Schedule 1 drugs require a prescription in order to be dispensed by a pharmacist. Schedule 2 drugs do not require a prescription but require a pharmacist's intervention. Schedule 3 drugs do not require a prescription but must be sold from the professional products area in a pharmacy. Unscheduled drugs may be sold in any retail outlet.

Review NAPRA decision to implement

Review NAPRA decision to implement

Office des professions Submission

Review by stakeholders

Drug Schedules are Amended

National Product Launch

Promotional Materials

Retail Contracts Production Labelling Advertising

Staggered Launches

Confirmation of Executive

Registrar

Drug Schedules are Amended

NAPRA Schedule by Reference

Quebec

Submission Review

Review Bureau Recommendation

Prescription Drug Status Committee

Preparation of Notice and Final Signatures

Public Posting of the Notice of Intent (NOI)

Consultation

Assessment of Comments Received

Preparation of Final Notice

Notification of Intent to Amend

(NOIA) the Prescription Drug

List (PDL)

Acknowledgement Letter

Supplemental New Drug

Submission (SNDS) to

Health Canada

Final HC Decision to Switch Ingredient

(Notice of Compliance

issued)

NAPRA Decision

UN

SCHEDULED...

SCHEDULE

3

SCHEDULE

2

SCHEDULE

1

SCHEDULE

2

SCHEDULE

1

UN

SCHEDULED...

SCHEDULE

3

SCHEDULE

2

SCHEDULE

1

The Office des Professions du Québec consults with:

• L’Institut national d’excellence en santé et en services sociaux

• Collège des médecins du Québec• L’Ordre des médecins vétérinaires du Québec• l’Ordre des pharmaciens du Québec

Board of Office des professions

Decision

BC College supports communications

and implementation

UN

SCHEDULED...

Any Retail Outlet

(*no standard timelines, up to 2 years)

Production

Labelling Advertising

Promotional Materials

Retail Contracts

Planograms

Market Research on

Consumer Demand

DevelopBusiness

Case

New Research (i.e., actual use, label

comprehension, & self-selection studies)

Clinical Studies (i.e., safety, efficacy,

chemistry & manufacturing

data)

Prepare Submission Package

Identify Switch

Candidate

PROVINCIAL SCHEDULING

Food & Drug ActFood & Drug Regulations

LEGISLATION LEGISLATION LEGISLATION

WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to TradeTrade Agreements (NAFTA, TRIPS)

NAPRA Bylaws/PoliciesConstitution Act

NAPRA Policies/BylawsConstitution Act

Provincial Pharmacy Act (9 provinces)Provincial Pharmacy Act & Professional Code (QC)

Natural Health Product RegulationsHealth Canada Guidelines

Provincial Pharmacy Act (9 provinces)Provincial Pharmacy Act & Professional Code (QC)

Agreement of Internal TradeAgreement on Internal Trade

NAPRA Executive

Committee Confirms Interim

Schedule Ruling

SCHEDULE

2

Behind the Counter

SCHEDULE

3

Pharmacy Only

SCHEDULE

1

Prescription Only

SCHEDULE

?

SCHEDULE

?

SCHEDULE

?

SCHEDULE

1

Prescription Only

OR DETAIL

The NAPRA application usually begins after the Health Canada review has been completed.

DETAIL

With the innovator's plans to switch a product now public, "second entry" entities can begin preparing submissions for second entry products. “Second entry” entities can reference the innovator's label and thus take advantage of all the proprietary work done by the innovator, making the "second entry" entity’s pathway to market much shorter and simpler.

DETAIL

"Second entry" entities rely on the innovator to bear the costs and effort to complete the lengthy provincial approval and implementation process, adding to their competitive advantage.

DETAIL

Staggered product launches are a result of the different lengths of time and processes for implementing scheduling decisions in each province. Some companies may choose not to launch products in all provinces as a result of this unpredictability and delay.

DETAIL

Some pharmacy chains will not stock drugs until the scheduling decisions have been implemented in all provinces. This substantially delays a national product launch.

DETAIL

All provinces except Quebec participate in NAPRA's national drug scheduling program. The provinces of On, MN, AB, Ns, PEI, NB, SK all schedule by reference to the NAPRA program without any delay.

DETAIL

Most companies choose to switch new consumer health products in other international markets first. Unlike the US and UK, Canada offers no protection for proprietary research that is done to show new uses for existing products. Also, the lack of integration between the Federal product approval process and the provincial drug scheduling process creates delays that compound the lack of data protection for the innovator.

225/345 DAYS

7 DAYS

75 DAYS

MIN. 7 DAYS

180 DAYS

225DAYS

UP TO 60DAYS

7 DAYS

30DAYS

30DAYS

30DAYS

60 DAYS

UP TO 2YEARS

45 DAYS

30DAYS

3 MONTHS

14 DAYS

Health Canada is the authority responsible for deciding whether or not to switch a product from prescription status to non-prescription status. They are making this decision without control over the conditions of sale (drug scheduling). Health Canada reviewers thus make their decisions on the assumption that a switch product could go directly to unscheduled status and be available in any retail outlet.

1

In Canada, prescription to non-prescription switches are ingredient-based. This means that all similar products containing that ingredient are also automatically switched. This requires Health Canada to give 6 months notification to international stakeholders as per the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade agreement.

3

After Health Canada approval, not all prescription to non-prescription switches are treated the same. By policy, Natural Health Products are excluded from the NAPRA scheduling process; however exceptions are made on an ad hoc basis. This adds uncertainty with respect to cost and timelines for innovators.

4

There is no legislative or regulatory framework governing NAPRA's role in drug scheduling. As a result there is no accountability to entities that are not members of NAPRA (e.g., submissions, sponsors, or the public).

5

The lack of a harmonized approach results in additional work, expense, and unpredictable delays for the innovator.

6The authority for implementing NAPRA's drug scheduling decisions stems from the provincial Pharmacy Acts in all provinces but Quebec. These Acts are designed for the regulation of the profession of pharmacy, not the regulation of products. This results in enforcement issues, inappropriate regulatory instruments and oversight, lack of harmonization for products, etc..

7

Quebec's consultation process is lengthy, has significant barriers to industry input and is not transparent or predictable. Switches are automatically directed to the most restrictive schedule and scheduling decisions are commonly more restrictive than those made by NAPRA, which creates inconsistent outcomes within Canada.

8

Due to the administrative complexities of the scheduling system in Canada, it is possible for a “second entry” product to be on the market before an innovator’s.

9

There are no data protection provisions in Canada that protect the information provided to Health Canada by innovators to support a switch.

2

1

3

2

4

5

6 7

8

9

7-12MONTHS

R E S E A R C H

A Visual Thinking Consultancy

CANADA’S CURRENT PROCESS FOR SWITCHING PRESCRIPTION DRUGS TO NON-PRESCRIPTION STATUS V.25.3.2016

KEY ISSUES