canada wastemanagement
TRANSCRIPT
WASTE MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR SUSTAINABILITY: SOME
EXPERIENCES OF SHRIRAM INSTITUTE FOR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH, INDIA
Presented by :
Dr. R.K. KHANDAL DIRECTOR
SHRIRAM INSTITUTE FOR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCHSHRIRAM INSTITUTE FOR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH19, UNIVERSITY ROAD, DELHI - 110007 (INDIA)19, UNIVERSITY ROAD, DELHI - 110007 (INDIA)
Email : [email protected] Website : www.shriraminstitute.org
WAITRO 2006 Biennial Congress Saskatoon, SK Canada
SUSTAINABILITY; AS DEFINED IN NATUREGreen plants are the food for plant eaters
Meat eaters supply waste materials for the decomoposers
Decomposers make chemicals for green plants
Plant eaters are food for animal
eaters
Disturbing this cycle is perhaps the tendency of all species involved in it.
Man being the wisest, amongst all, must make efforts to preserve the life-cycle sustainability
WAITRO 2006 Biennial Congress Saskatoon, SK Canada
SUSTAINABILITY
SUSTAINABLE
• Natural• Independent of Time• Spontaneous• Cyclic• Harmonical• Space for all• Creation oriented• No dead end• Supportive• Universal
NOT-SUSTAINABLE
• Man-made• Time dependent• Energy Driven• Linear• Imbalance-prone• Haves & Have-nots• Elimination-oriented• Dead-end certain• Exploitative• Obsolete with time
WAITRO 2006 Biennial Congress Saskatoon, SK Canada
The terms like growth, economics, benefits, loss etc. have little significance in sustainable processes
Sustainability varnishes with the breaking of cyclic events
Product
Application
WasteDegradation
products
Inputs
Process
Waste
Technological challenges are met through research Factors responsible for sustainability can only be controlled
through research
ROLE OF RESEARCH IN SUSTAINABILITY
Byproducts
Long life Short LifeHazardous
Safe
WAITRO 2006 Biennial Congress Saskatoon, SK Canada
SyntheticRenewable
Hazardous
Green
Striking a balance is the concept of Triple Benefit ? Can be manowered by Research
ROLE OF RESEARCH IN SUSTAINABILITY
WAITRO 2006 Biennial Congress Saskatoon, SK Canada
• Viability• Profits• Losses• Growth• Expansion
• Exploitation • Survival • Competition • Community
• Resources • Ecology • Cyclic Phenomenon
Input
Process
Application
Waste
ROLE OF RESEARCH IN SUSTAINABILITY
Degradation Products
Raw Material
Renewable
Green
Environment Friendly
Biodegradation
Basic Bio-organic Matter
Burden on the Environment
Energy Renewable
Emission Environment Friendly
Waste Waste Utilization
CHALLENGES FOR SUSTAINABILITY:SIMPLE TO DEFINE DIFFICULT TO ACHIEVE CHALLENGES
Sustainable Non-sustainable Challenges
Synthetic Renewable Alternates
Consumption Replenishment Sustainable Source
Chemical Route Bio-route Environment Friendly
Green
Waste Waste UtilizationReuse, Repair, Recycle
Avoid short cuts Think Collective
WAITRO 2006 Biennial Congress Saskatoon, SK Canada
Take global view Share Experiences
FACTS ABOUT SUSTAINABILITY
Negatives
Need for sustainability has become a cause of concern for
development countries more than the developing ones. Sustainability is achievable only through cooperative approach
and working together.WAITRO 2006 Biennial Congress
Saskatoon, SK Canada
Positives
• Global Warming• Climate changes
Consensus to control emissions etc.
Depletion of resourcesAlternatives becoming feasible
Flight for energy resources Success on Bio-energy
Imbalance of Trade & Trade Barriers
WTO & Multi-lateral Collaborations
Rising Disparities Enough for All
Renewable Energy Efficient Water Efficient
Input
Process
Product
Applications
Waste
PRIORITIES PARTNER ROLE
RESEARCH PRIORITIES FOR SUSTAINABILITY
LEVEL
Global view of resources
Green Environment Friendly Energy Efficient
Protection of environment ecology
Safe Long-usage life Bio-degradable
Local production Centralised production
Safe Conditions Optimise available resources
Value from Waste Reuse, Repair, recycle
WAITRO 2006 Biennial Congress Saskatoon, SK Canada
EXPERIENCES OF SHRIRAM INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABILITY
WASTE TYPES TECHNOLOGIES
Approach : Value from Waste
PLASTIC
• Road Composites
• Energy
TEXTILE • Sanitary Napkins
CERAMIC FIBRE • Insulating Tiles etc.
FLY ASH • Cement
WAITRO 2006 Biennial Congress Saskatoon, SK Canada
Not only developed technologies but also established their impact.
THREATS TO SUSTAINABILITY
Demographic • Uncontrolled population growth
WAITRO 2006 Biennial Congress Saskatoon, SK Canada
Can scientific progress and improvement of technology always help to find new solutions !
Resources • Non-renewable sources of energy• Mineral raw materials• Fertile soil for food for overgrowing
population
Disposal and related problems
• Waste • Climate change• Ozone holes• Green house effect• Environmental pollution
Political and Social • Disparity between developed and developing countries
Natural Capital
Diversity
Population
Environmental
Sustainability
ECONOMIC
Economic Equality
Harmonization is required between the 3 components Environment - Progress of human society brings about unchangeable
damage to environment Economy - Distribution between : developed and developing countries
present and coming generation Social - Does economic growth always lead to increasing welfare, quality
of life
COMPONENTS OF SUSTAINABILITY
Lifestyle Health
SOCIAL
Resources
Responsibility of future generation
Equitable distribution of work, income and
opportunities in life
More value
viable economy
Brings advancement that benefit human kind
Make everyday life easier
protect Environment
Tap new employment potential
RESEARCH FOR SUSTAINABILITY:NECESSISTY
OUTLINE
Research & Development
Criteria for selection of R&D Projects
Feasibility, Profitability, Planning and Execution of R&D projects
Market as a driving force for R&D
Continuous R&D : A cyclic process for technology
Technology success dynamics
Research
Development
Technology
Market
Increase stock of knowledge; knowledge of man, culture and society
To use this stock of knowledge to devise new applications; improvements in standard of living
Sustainable
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Basic Research
Applied Research
Experimental Developments
R&D CLASSIFICATION
Quest for development
Desire to improve
Aim to have growth
Experimental or theoretical work
Primarily to acquire new knowledge
Not necessarily with a specific
application or use in mind
Clears concepts and gains are for long-
term
Essential for answering whys
BASIC RESEARCH
Experimental or theoretical work
Use knowledge for improvements
For a specific practical aim or objective
Driving force for R&D
Helps build capability to convert ideas into products to meet needs
APPLIED RESEARCH
Systematic work
Based on existing knowledge gained from research and/or practical experience
Directed to produce new materials, products or devices
New processes, systems or services with substantial improvements
EXPERIMENTAL DEVELOPMENTS
Presence of an appreciable element of novelty
Existence of demand in the form of stakeholders as the driving force
Sustainability
Cost-benefit analysis
CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF R&D PROJECTS
Criteria
Key Factors
IdeasStage 0
Preliminary Market Assessment
Preliminary Financial Assessment Preliminary Technical Assessment
• Necessities
• Knowledge Base
• Market Demand & Status
• Product requirement
• Cost-benefit analysis
• Feasibility
• Viability
Activities Inputs
Decision 1
Stage 1
SELECTION PROCESS : FEASIBILITY
• Technology partner
•Regulatory Agencies
• Local production & imports
• Long term benefits
• Patent rights & technology
• Industry partnership
• Stakeholder
Activities Inputs
Decision 2
Stage 2
Detailed Market Assessment
Detailed Financial Assessment Detailed Technical Assessment
SELECTION PROCESS : STAKEHOLDERS
Stakeholders
•Market potential & demand
• Policy makers
•Regulatory Agencies
• Comparison with reference
• Product requirement
•Quality evaluation parameters
• Joint trials
• Customer satisfaction
Activities Inputs
Decision 3
Stage 3
Specifications and Design Prototype Construction Prototype Testing
SELECTION PROCESS : CUSTOMER SELECTION PROCESS : CUSTOMER SATISFACTIONSATISFACTION
Customer
Tooling and Documentation Pre-production Testing and Redesign Initial Market Testing Marketing Strategy Distribution and Sales Failure Tracking
• Technology package
• Process control parameters & quality control parameters
• Demonstration
• Feed backs
• Scale up
• Market acceptability
• Product properties meeting requirements
• Project completion report
• Technology package
• Success factors
• Risk factors
Activities Inputs
Decision 4
Stage 4
SELECTION PROCESS : SUCCESS FACTORSSELECTION PROCESS : SUCCESS FACTORS
Success Factor
Technical inputs:
Technical competence
Existing status vis-à-vis desried level of
competence
Facilities’ Availability
Regulatory issues
Achievable improvements with existing technical inputs
Ensuring regulatory nroms
FEASIBILITY : TECHNICAL
Commercial issues:
Raw material availability
Access to market
Demand
Competition
Cost of making Vs outsourcing!
Viability of R&D project
FEASIBILITY : COMMERCIAL
Quality and continuous improvement
Sustainable demand; seasonal or regular
Costs vs purchase power; margins & viability
Scale of production; cost / piece
There should be takers for the product !
There should be a definite edge over competition
PROFITABILITY
Coordination of various activities to achieve desired results ensuring:
Time schedule
Smooth operation
Regular reviews
Decision making at each stage to make amendments backed by sound appraisal
Involvement of all stakeholders is the
key!
PLANNING
Achieving the targets with:
Minimum efforts
Maximum output
Trouble shooting
Aiming for the satisfaction of the user:
Minimum biases
Maximum scope for improvements
A fool-proof control & appraisal system to
be in place
Ownership of project activities is the key!
EXECUTION
Procedure
Deliverables
Cost
Quality
Controls help in making amendments
Controls & appraisals are key factors for success of R&D projects
R&D PROJECT CONTROLS
Technology Development Process
Identification of the problem
Definition of problem
Technical Feasibility
Commercial Feasibility
• Need for technology
• Well defined objectives
• Technical capability
• Ready takers market and market sustainability
• Impact Factor
• Well understood objectives
• Deliverables
• Resource Capability
• Hazards analysis
• Regulatory Clearances
• Cost-effective value addition & Relevance
Success depends on understanding of problem & defining the scope of research
Technology Development Process
Work Plan Appraisal Prototype Design Review
• Objective in focus
• Time & Inputs as per with objectives
• Scope for appraisal & review at each step
• Optimum utilization of resources (indigenous)
Demo
• By all stake holders
• As per objectives Time, Quality Cost
• To meet purpose
• To pass scrutiny of deliverables
• To be safe from cradle to Grave
• To assess the degree of innovation
• To gauge the long term and short term impact
• To evaluate the improvements over the existing knowledge
• To establish the deliverable of acquired knowledge
• Meeting all the design criteria and objectives
Market acceptability can only be achieved through demonstration of technology
Technology Development Process
SUCCESS FACTORS
•Existing Needs •Market •Defining Objectives •Design Criteria and Design Basis
•R & D•Review and Appraisal
•Demonstration
RISK FACTORS
•Times Dynamics •Potential and sustainability •Understanding objectives
and deliverables •Feasibility studies •Approach flexibility &
innovation •Criteria •Participation of stake
holders
Risk factors should be considered at the design stage itself
Technology Development ProcessPrototype
Review
Output
Review Appraisal
Input
Feasibility
Process
Innovation 360° Approach
Involvement
of Stake HoldersReview & Appraisal
Research
R&D leads to technology
Development
RESEARCH VIS-A-VIS DEVELOPMENT• Success
• Market Acceptability
• Technology
• Success
• Technology
• Market
Acceptability
• Success
• Technology
• Growth
• Success
• Innovation
• Technology
Demand
Market is a big driving force for technology
Potential
MARKET POTENTIAL & DEMAND FOR R&D
• Threat
• High Risk
• Innovation
• Alternatives
• Strength
• Sustainability
• Low Risk
• Application
• Challenge
• Low Risk
• Weakness
• Unique Technology
• Opportunity
• high Risk
• Affordability
• Technology Edge
Market Size
Market Dynamics
Needs
Trends
Resources
Sustainability
Value Addition
Product Differentiation
Improvements
USP
Alternatives
Continuously Total
Quality Improvements
Control points are the driving force as well as determinants for technology selection
FACTORS CONTROL POINT
TECHNOLOGY SELECTION : CONTROL FACTORS
R & D
Ideas
Innovations
Product
Application
Improvements
Innovations
Ideas
Success of a technology requires continuous R&D inputs
Continuous R&D : A Cyclic Process
TECHNOLOGY SUCCESS DYNAMICS : R & D
Interfacing of determinants ensures sustainability and improvements in quality : Key to success
Research MarketProduct
Capacity Quality Demand
• Irreversible
• Product Focus
• Market Focus
• Image Focus
• Reversible
• R & D Focus
• Customer Focus
TECHNOLOGY SUCCESS DYNAMICS : MARKET
Market
Production R & D
QualitySustainabilit
y
Capability Sustainability Affordability
THANK YOU