can we afford our future?

13
Can We Afford our Future? STICERD 25th Anniversary Lecture www.lse.ac.uk/events Conference and Events Office Emeritus Professor Howard Glennerster FBA SRC Professor John Hills SE, Chair

Upload: leander-thady

Post on 02-Jan-2016

27 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

STICERD 25th Anniversary Lecture. Can We Afford our Future?. Emeritus Professor Howard Glennerster FBA ESRC Professor John Hills LSE, Chair. Conference and Events Office. www.lse.ac.uk/events. Population structure, 2001 and 2051. Age distribution of welfare spending, 2001. No Problem!. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Can We Afford our Future? STICERD 25th Anniversary Lecture

www.lse.ac.uk/eventsConference and Events Office

Emeritus Professor Howard Glennerster FBAESRC

Professor John HillsLSE, Chair

Population structure, 2001 and 2051

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90

Age range (lower limit)

Perc

enta

ge o

f pop

ulat

ion

in a

ge ra

nge

2001 population

2051 population

Age distribution of welfare spending, 2001

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90

Age range (lower limit)

2001

spe

ndin

g (£

000s

per

per

son)

Education

Health

Social Security

No Problem!

Demography has a small impact The UK has already taken the

steps necessary on pensions The problem is self correcting

Treasury projections, age related spending(% GDP)

Health

Education

Pensions

L-T care

Other Total

2001/2

6.3 4.6 5.0 0.9 21.7 38.6

2011/12

8.2 5.9 5.0 1.2 20.3 40.6

2031/2

9.3 5.8 5.2 1.2 20.0 41.3

2051/2

9.8 5.7 4.8 1.2 19.3 40.8

Age related spending, % GDP

2001/2 2051 additional

Health 6.3 9.8 + 3.5

Education 4.6 5.7 + 1.1

Long Term Care 0.9 1.4 + 0.5

Pensions and other 65+benefits

5.5 9.1 + 3.6

Total + + 8.7

Our future?

Paying more in tax Reducing mid life consumption

patterns Working longer Getting used to lower incomes in

retirement

A Feasible Future Private saving based on a secure

state platform Base line above means test Higher full pension age Secure against private system and

personal risks Redress gender inequalities in

private schemes

Dutch citizens’ pension Drawn at 65 (women earlier if not

working) Entitlement over 50 years of residence Contributions as a percentage income

tax Pension takes virtually all off means tests Adjusted as wages rise – linked to

minimum wage

Advantages

Incentive to join funded schemes Simple No complex contribution records Does not disadvantage women and

those with limited lifetime work records

Progressive funding

Modifications

Generosity linked to political feasibility Employer contributions could be kept Age at which get pension could be 68 Years to qualify negotiable Pensions needed for those incapable

of full work