can u.s. renewable law & policy catch up? · pdf filecan u.s. renewable law & policy...
TRANSCRIPT
World Renewable Energy Forum Session 0530
May 14, 2012
1:15-2:30 p.m.
Can U.S. Renewable Law &
Policy Catch Up?
K.K. DuVivier
Professor of Law
University of Denver,
Sturm College of Law
I. CONTEXT:
United States & World
Energy Statistics
II. IMPEDIMENTS:
A Bit of History
III. HELP?
1.2 The Renewable Energy Reader Figure 1.2—World primary energy consumption
The Renewable Energy Reader Figure 1.3 –Growth in world energy demand & consumption
Source: U.S. Energy Info. Admin., Int’l Energy Outlook 2010 1 (2010)
The Renewable Energy Reader Figure 1.8
The Renewable Energy Reader Figure 1.5— U.S. Energy Production and Consumption
Source: National Renewable Energy Lab., 2009 Renewable Energy Databook 7 (2010)
Source: National Renewable Energy Lab., 2010 Renewable Energy Databook 107 (2011) http://www.nrel.gov/analysis/pdfs/51680.pdf
The Renewable Energy Reader Figure 1.6 U.S. electricity capacity and generation
Source: National Renewable Energy Lab., 2009 Renewable Energy Databook 10 (2010)
Source: National Renewable Energy Lab., 2010 Renewable Energy Databook 28 (2011) http://www.nrel.gov/analysis/pdfs/51680.pdf
Source: National Renewable Energy Lab., 2010 Renewable Energy Databook 55 (2011) http://www.nrel.gov/analysis/pdfs/51680.pdf
The playing field will not be level, even if all financial advantages (tax breaks, subsidies, etc.) are removed, because:
1) The price of conventional fuels does not account for externalities (air & water pollution , health costs, GHGs,);
2) -Infrastructure perpetuates & supports conventional fuels (petroleum fueling stations, highway system, RR for coal);
3) Conventional fuels had years to mature & were established before extensive public input & environmental review, which would have prevented their development today (mining, dam building, fracing).
The Renewable Energy Reader Figure 1.4—Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) of Renewable Electricity by Technology
Note: The price of solar PV panels was almost cut in half in 2010-2011 because of imports of cheap panels from China. A tariff was added in 4/12. Installation costs of PV are much higher in U.S.—DOE Solar Sunshot Initiative is working to change this.
Source: National Renewable Energy Lab., 2009 Renewable Energy Databook 13 (2010)
True monetized cost of generating electricity from coal= 9 ¢ to 27 ¢/kWh Epstein, Full Cost Accounting for the Life Cycle of Coal, 1219 Annals N.Y. Acad. Sci, 73 (2011) cited in RER pp. 7-8
A Brief Chronology of the Incandescent Lightbulb
1802: Humphrey Davy of
Great Britain created the first incandescent
light with a strip of platinum.
1879: Thomas Edison filed
patent for the carbon filament incandescent
light bulb.
1882: World's first
hydroelectric power plant began operation
on the Fox River in Appleton, Wisconsin.
1885: 300,000 carbon
filament bulbs in use.
1904: Hungarian patent granted to
Sandor Just & Franjo Hananan for tungsten filament
incandescent light bulb. Tungsten filament bulbs lasted
longer and gave whiter light than carbon filaments.
1945: 795 million bulbs in U.S.
1914: 88.5 million bulbs in
U.S.
77 years
210 years
102 years
A Brief Chronology of the Automobile
1769: Steam engine
automobiles for human transport
1806: Internal combustion
engine running on fuel gas
1859: Drake’s well—oil
discovered in Pennsylvania Titusville, PA
1878: Spurred by a $10,000
reward from the State of Wisconsin, 1 vehicle
finished a 201 mile contest course
Late 1890s: Dominance of
petrol-gal internal combustion engine by 1910 (helped to
propel the petroleum industry)
1908-27: Model T—widely
available & affordable assembly line car
1921: Bureau of public roads asked
the army to list roads necessary for national defense
1938: FDR gave Thomas
MacDonald, chief of Bureau of Public Roads, a
hand drawn map of 8 superhighway corridors
1956: National Interstate and Defense Highways Act
setting up federal support & funding
mechanism
37 years
102 years 48 years
243 years
History of Solar PV
1921: Einstein wins Nobel Prize for theories on photovoltaic effect
1977: Solar Energy
Research Institute (now NREL) established
2007: 14.2MW solar PV array
at Nellis AFB, NV.
1954: Bell Labs creates
“power photocell” Costs $250-$300 / watt
2010: 58 MW Copper Mtn
Solar Facility, NV
58 years
1979: Costs: $10-20/watt
25 Kw at Mead, NE for remote hydro pumping
(still in operation)
33 years
1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020
1969 NEPA
HYDRO 1882
WIND 1979
SOLAR (CSP) 2010
PETROLEUM 1890
NUCLEAR 1955 / 1957
GEOTHERMAL 1960
COAL 1882
First Private Utility-Scale Electricity Generation By
Source
SOLAR (PV) 2010
0
10
20
30
40
50
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Growth of U.S. Environmental Statutes
OSHA CAA
NEPA WSRA NHPA WRPA SWDA
WA
CERCLA EEA
ESAA SWRCA SMCRA
CWA CAAA RCRA
FLPMA TSCA
ESECA SDWA
DPA ESA
MMPA PWSA FIFRA
HCA CZMA
MPRSA WPCA
SARA SDWAA
EPAA RCRAA NWPA
RHA
IA RA
WL
WRA FCA TGA
FWCA
CSISSFRRA FIFRA
NTTAA
EISA FFDCA
http://www.epa.gov/lawsregs/laws/
1969 NEPA
I. CONTEXT:
United States & World
Energy Statistics
II. IMPEDIMENTS:
A Bit of History
III. HELP?
U.S. Renewable Law and Policy: Catch Up or The Clock Strikes Midnight!
Jeff Thaler Visiting Professor of Energy Policy, Law & Ethics
University of Maine
(207) 228-8539
May 14, 2012
1) Why Should We Care if U.S. Renewable Energy “Catches Up”?
2) How Can We Level the Cost Playing Field For Renewables vs. Fossil Fuels?
3) What Are Some of Renewable Energy’s Permitting Hurdles To Fix?
4) When? Actions to Take to Tilt the Regulatory Playing Field for Renewables to Catch Up– Now!
1) Why Should We Care if U.S. Renewable Energy
“Catches Up”? Many Critical Reasons…..
UN Secty. General Ban Ki-Moon, 12/11/09
Climate change is by far the most important and fundamental issue affecting all of our lives. It affects core development issues: poverty, water scarcity, disease, regional and political instability, global health. All of these issues are interconnected. [If we take on climate change], we can be in a much better position to address and resolve all of these issues. Climate change affects the future of humanity, and it affects the future of the planet Earth.
IEA Tracking Clean Energy Progress 4/12
We have a responsibility and a golden opportunity to act,” said IEA Deputy Executive Director Ambassador Richard H Jones. “Energy-related CO2 emissions are at historic highs; under current policies, we estimate that energy use and CO2 emissions would increase by a third by 2020, and almost double by 2050. This would likely send global temperatures at least 6°C higher. Such an outcome would confront future generations with significant economic, environmental and energy security hardships – a legacy that I know none of us wishes to leave behind.” http://www.iea.org/papers/2012/Tracking_Clean_Energy_Progress.pdf
What Would Six Degrees Look Like?
1⁰C Lose many tropical coral reefs and mountain glaciers
2⁰C Greenland ice sheet reaches point of unstoppable melt; Europe heat waves; 75% Reduced Sierra Nevada snow pack
3⁰C Tipping Point? Parts of Amazon rainforest collapse due to cycles of drought and fires
4⁰C Arctic ice cap melts; Permafrost esp. Siberian releases GHGs; Glacier fed rivers largely dry up
5⁰C Coastal cities severely flood during seasonal storms from sea level rise; more desertification
6⁰C Many species face extinction
Lynas Links and Thaler Moral:
• http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2007/apr/23/scienceandnature.climatechange
• http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/sixdegrees/interactive.html
We are fiddling while the world slowly, but increasingly, burns.
Doomsday Clock graph. The lower the graph becomes, the higher the probability of catastrophe is deemed to be: Now at 5 minutes to Midnight. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doomsday_Clock)
Climate Change Also Is a Health Threat
--Humans depend on a safe climate for clean and plentiful water to drink and air to breathe, good soil for food, strong health, jobs, and a sustainable society for our children and theirs.
--Ocean resources depend on a safe climate to reduce exposure to increasing acidification and temperatures, and Forest resources to avoid spreading insect pest ranges, significant habitat losses, and resultant economic losses.
2) How Can Law and Policy Level the Cost Playing Field for Renewables Versus Fossil-Based Sources?
Let Us Count The Ways…..
From the International Energy Administration’s Tracking Clean Energy Progress Report,
April 2012
To move clean-energy technologies to the mainstream market: You must Level the playing field for clean energy technologies. This means ensuring that energy prices reflect the “true cost” of energy – accounting for the positive and negative impacts of energy production and consumption. [BUT HOW?]
http://www.iea.org/papers/2012/Tracking_Clean_Energy_Progress.pdf
One Cost: Relative Carbon
Dioxide Emisssions
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Coa
lOil
Diese
l Fuel
Gas
olin
e
Pro
pane
Nat
ura
l Gas
Sol
ar
Win
d
Hyd
ropower
lbs
CO
2/m
illi
on
BT
U
Carbon Dioxide Emitted Per Quantity of Energy by Fuel Source (derived from the Energy Information Administration, “Voluntary Reporting of
Greenhouse Gases Program”
Renewables and Carbon Emissions
We know wind, hydro, tidal, geothermal, and solar power generally do not directly emit carbon emissions– but what about biofuels?
16
GHGs from direct & indirect land-use change/energy crop http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v1/n8/fig_tab/nclimate12
65_F1.html
2009 National Research Council “Hidden Costs of Energy”
--Non-climate damages estimated to be $120 Billion in 2005 (human health, grain crop, timber yields, building materials, recreation, visibility of outdoor vistas) --$62 Billion Coal electricity generation & $740 MM Natural Gas --$56 Billion from ground transportation (oil-petroleum) --$1.4 Billion from Heating with Natural Gas
--There are also many important policy issues which are not priced externalities:
- Indirect food price effects of biofuels - Oil supply and price shocks
National Research Council Conclusions --Non-climate damages from electricity generation and transportation exceed $120 billion (2005)-- principally related to emissions of NOx, SO2, PM.
--That is a substantial underestimate because it does not include damages related to climate change, health effects of hazardous pollutants, ecosystem effects, or infrastructure and national security.
--Climate damages vary greatly depending on the discount rate and the relationship between warming and GDP impacts. If the unit damage is more than $30/ton of CO2-eq, climate damages would likely be at least as large as non-climate damages.
http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=12794
Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions
(g CO2eq/kWh) 20
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Adapted from: Jacobson, M. Review of solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy security, Energy &
Environmental Science, 2008
Social Costs ($/kWh)
Sources: Energy Information Administration (2010); Epstein, P.R. et al (2011); Howarth, R.W., et al. (2011); Muller, N. Z., et al. (2011); National Research Council, U.S. National Academy of Sciences (2009); Stern, N (2006); Weitzman, M.L (2007).
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
Wind NGCC NGCC highCO2
Oil/gasTurbine
Coal
Justice &Insurance
Health &EnvironmentalCosts
Private Costs
Intergenerational justice
Insurance against catastrophe (Stern)
Fracking Health
?
One Tool: State Renewable & Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards (Not Federal)
http://www.c2es.org/what_s_being_done/in_the_states/rps.cfm
23
* Renewable CHP systems are eligible; fossil-fueled CHP systems are not eligible.
‡Includes only those states that allow fuel cells using nonrenewable energy sources of hydrogen. Some states allow only renewable fuel cells (Arizona,
California, Colorado, Delaware, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, Wisconsin) as eligible technologies.
Source: U.S. EPA Clean Energy-Environment Guide to Action (2006), Database of State Incentives for Renewable Energy (DSIRE) last accessed July
2007,
Resource Eligibility Eligibility of technologies varies by state and depends on whether an energy resource or technology supports state goals.
Another Tool: U.S. Production Tax Credits by Source
Resource Type In-Service Deadline Credit Amount
Wind December 31, 2012 2.2¢/kWh
Closed-Loop Biomass December 31, 2013 2.2¢/kWh
Open-Loop Biomass December 31, 2013 1.1¢/kWh
Geothermal Energy December 31, 2013 2.2¢/kWh
Landfill Gas December 31, 2013 1.1¢/kWh
Municipal Solid Waste December 31, 2013 1.1¢/kWh
Qualified Hydroelectric December 31, 2013 1.1¢/kWh
Marine and Hydrokinetic (150 kW or larger)**
December 31, 2013 1.1¢/kWh
Third Tool to Adjust: Fossil v Renewable Subsidies http://www.eli.org/pdf/Energy_Subsidies_Black_Not_Green.pdf
3) What Are Some of Renewable Energy’s Permitting Hurdles That Need To Be Fixed?
Let’s Look at Ocean Energy….
FERC Tidal Pilot (<5MW, <5yrs) Licensing Flow Chart http://www.ferc.gov/industries/hydropower/gen-
info/licensing/hydrokinetics/energy-pilot.asp
(Some) U. S. Federal Law and Policy Hurdles for Offshore Wind
• National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) • Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Lease (BOEM) • Endangered Species Act (ESA) • Magnuson Stevens Fishery Convention & Management Act • Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act • National Marine Sanctuaries Act • Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 • Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) • Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) • Clean Air Act (CAA) • Clean Water Act (CWA) • National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) • Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) • Fishery Conservation and Management Act (FCMA) • Executive Order 12114: Environmental Effects Abroad • Executive Order 12898: Environmental Justice • Executive Order 13007: Indian Sacred Sites • Executive Order 13089: Coral Reef Protection
Federal Endangered Species Act Hurdles
-- Prohibits the “take” of a species federally listed as threatened or endangered.
-- “Take” means to harass, harm, pursue, wound, kill, capture or collect– or to disrupt normal behavioral patterns or significantly impair essential behavioral patterns
-- “Take” through “harm” can also include by impactful habitat modification
-- Incidental Take Permit then required—Can Require Years of Studies and Processing
Federal Marine Mammal Protection Act --Prohibits “taking” of marine mammals unless specifically permitted by law;
--Incidental take protection can be sought—again, multiple requirements and months or longer.
Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act --Prohibits the “taking” of migratory birds;
--No incidental take permit available; need to explore possible special purpose permit options.
-- Risk of prosecution if a bird is “taken” is a hotly debated topic today
Additional State (ie Maine) Requirements, Even for Projects in Federal Waters, Include:
-- Multiple statutory approvals for cabling running within 3 miles of State lands….
-- Also for Any Onshore or Near-shore Assembly and Staging Areas That May Impact State Waters or Land (Including Islands)
FOR EXAMPLE:
Site Location of Development Act
--Need Dept. of Envtl. Protection Site Location of Development Permit, but no expedited permitting process;
--Must show, in part, no adverse effect on natural environment, scenic character, natural resources in the area;
--Also adequate provision to fit development harmoniously into existing natural environment.
Permitting Result?
Multiple years, Multiple Types and Levels of Approvals Required, Multiple Degrees of Developer and Financier Uncertainty, Risks, and Higher Costs, and Multiple Ways for Renewable Projects to Never Get Steel into the Ground or Water
4) Actions to Take to Tilt the Playing
Field for Renewables to Catch Up–
Now!
More than a Level Field with Fossils Needed– 5 Minutes to Midnight
Must Tilt the Field to Faster, Expedited and One-Stop Reviews for Permit and Lease Approvals…Some Experts’ Ideas…..
UMaine Students’ Ideas --Streamline permitting and regulatory review ie one stop permitting, expedited timelines and zoning(ie Maine wind); time limits for issuance of permit decisions or else approved for renewable projects. Use rebuttable presumptions. --Enact National Renewable Portfolio Standard --Rebuttable Presumption that interference with a neighbor’s solar access is a legal nuisance --More $$ for generation and distribution efficiency initiatives --End fossil subsidies; impose carbon tax based on true social costs of energy source; Long term subsidy policy for all renewable energy, staggered- higher in beginning, lower overtime
More Students’ Ideas --Kyoto Protocol—US sign it! --Carbon offsets: Mandatory, not optional, ie for air flights, car travel, etc. --Education efforts using social media to emphasize local impacts of climate change; Be more visible, concrete, ie calculate # tons of carbon emissions you or a business do a year, then create something of that weight/appearance and install in front yard, lobby, etc -- Choice visuals: oil refinery nearby vs favorite mtn top leveled for coal vs on or offshore wind farm --Start earlier than college on climate change, sustainability educating ie elementary schools
Or We Could Learn from The Mouse That Roared….
Denmark --Danish Energy Authority is A Single Agency Overseeing Permitting, Transmission, Incentives
-- 30% Investment Tax Credit (‘79-’89); Feed-In Tariff (‘81-onward), Carbon Tax (‘92)
--Long-Term Wind Financing if Use Danish Turbines
--Each municipality must plan 75MW wind capacity
--Turbine-owner & Utility share Grid connection costs
--Mandatory Efficiency regs, more Cogeneration
--Long-term, consistent energy financing policies encourage investment and R&D
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-june-16-2010/an-energy-independent-future
The End?
By Contrast: U.S. “Clean” Energy Policy: After 8 Presidents’ Speeches, Time’s A Wasting to Turn Back the
Doomsday Clock
bhfs.com Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
Solyndra Fallout
A Fukushima for U.S. Renewable Energy,
or just a bump in the road?
Presented by
John A. Herrick Brownstein Hyatt Farber
Schreck, LLP
Denver, CO
May 14, 2012
World Renewable
Energy Conference
Denver, CO
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
2
U. S. Renewable Energy Sector is in a Hiatus
Great Recession of 2009 is still lingering in renewable financing
Private Capital is on the sideline and hasn’t come back
Project financing is in the doldrums
The 2010 U.S. Stimulus funding is over
Was great while it lasted
It is now over and a new round of funding may not come back
Private Sector has not picked up the slack
Congress is in a foul mood with tax incentives for renewables
U.S. Energy Policy – Cheap Energy
New era for natural gas and alternative fossil fuel development
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
3
U.S. Energy Policy is in an Election Year Mode
Congress will not address climate change issues this
year or likely next year
The energy issues in the Presidential election will
revolve around cheap energy – not long term
considerations
The task facing the renewable sector in federal policy
is to hunker down and fight to retain what has been
won in the past
Get tax extender legislation passed in the lame duck
session
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
4
Despite What You Hear, the Federal
Stimulus Was a Success
Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy R & D
Stimulus Package - $18.5 Billion for various federal and state EE & RE grant programs
$11 Billion to states
ARPA – E $400 million
Smart grid - $4.5 Billion
DOE’s Loan Guarantees for Renewable Projects
DOE has made $15.1 Billion in loan guarantees for 30 major renewable energy project financings
Median project size - $141 million
“Shovel Readiness” and Job Creation
Has another $15 Billion in projects in the pipeline under conditional commitments
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
5
The Stimulus Extended and Expanded Federal Tax
Incentives for Renewable Energy Projects
Investment Tax Credit
Production Tax Credit
Manufacturing Tax Credit
Cash Grant in Lieu of Credit Program
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
6
Investment Tax Credit (ITC)
ITC Credit is 30% of investment cost in the capital facility
Claimed year facility placed into service
Primarily solar, but also small wind projects, pre-
transmission geothermal 10%: post-transmission
geothermal, microturbines, combined heat & power
Placed in service on or before December 31, 2016
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
7
Production Tax Credit (PTC)
Tax credit based upon amount based on sale of
“electricity” produced from “qualified energy resources”:
wind
closed-loop and open-loop biomass
geothermal
Realized over 10 years commencing with year placed in
service -
generally 2.1 cents per kilowatt hour
phased-out proportionally over the 10 years
Placed in service
on or before December 31, 2012 for wind projects
on or before December 31, 2013 for all other projects
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
8
Cash Grant in in lieu of PTC or ITC (§ 1603
Program) Was the major success story of the Stimulus
Opened renewable financing to entities without tax liabilities
Immediate cash, relatively simple process
Supported 23,000 PV and large wind projects from 2009-2011
supported $30 billion in investments
Solar market grew 176% during this period
Added 13,000 MW of wind and solar to the grid
Construction & installation jobs - @60,000 jobs
Indirect jobs - @ 55,000 jobs
O&M permanent jobs - @ 5,250 jobs
Source:
Preliminary Analysis of the Jobs and Economic Impacts of Renewable Energy Projects Supported by the §1603
Treasury Grant Program, NRELNREL/TP-6A20-52739, April 2012, Daniel Steinberg, Gian Porro, Marshall
Goldberg
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
9
§ 1603 Cash Grant
Source:
Preliminary Analysis of the Jobs and Economic Impacts of Renewable Energy Projects Supported by the §1603 Treasury Grant
Program, NRELNREL/TP-6A20-52739, April 2012, Daniel Steinberg, Gian Porro, Marshall Goldberg
Gash Grant Affect
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
10
§ 1603 Cash Grant Deadlines – Its about over
Property must be placed in service in 2011, or before the credit
termination date for such property, provided construction began
during 2011
The credit termination date for large wind projects is January 1,
2013 and is January 1, 2017 for solar projects
An application must be submitted before October 1, 2012 for
property that will not be placed in service before December 31,
2011
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
11
Some Good Funding News, Some Bad For FY 2013
Senate Appropriations Subcommittee has just passed a measure
that would provide $2 billion for DOE renewable energy and
energy efficiency office
A $160 million increase from FY 2012 levels
$500 million more than the House funding mark for FY 2013
ARPA-E was marked $37 million over its current 2012 budget
Neither House or Senate provided additional funds for Loan
Guarantees in FY 2013
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
12
Could this be the high water mark?
Crash Grant Program has not been extended by Congress, nor
does it seem likely that it will be extended
In 2010, Congress made a last-minute decision to extend the
1603 program for 2011
On November 30, 2011, more than 750 renewable energy trade
groups and companies sent a letter to Congress urging an
extension of the 1603 program to no avail
Manufacturing Tax Credit has not been extended, nor is it likely
that it will be extended by Congress
Best chance with Congress is extending the PTC
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
13
Along Came Solyndra!
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
14
Solyndra A $535 million loan guarantee for PV manufacturing facility in
Fremont, California 2009 issued by DOE in 2009
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in August 2011, defaulted on guaranteed
loan
Reason: Unfair competition from Chinese panel manufactures?
Puts a dark cloud over DOE’s Loan Guarantee Program and all
federal programs for clean energy
U.S. Treasury – Out $525 million
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
15
Clean energy has now become a political football
Political knives are out for shaky
clean energy projects funded with
public dollars
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
16
Failure to Extend the Production Tax Credit
PTC expires at end of this year
Is now the main federal incentive for large wind projects
Congress has so far refused to extend credit
Will the Lame Duck Congress save the day?
Long wait until November, December?
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
17 Source: AWEA/EIA – “Federal Production Tax Credit for Wind Energy”
Historic Impact of PTC expiration on annual wind installation
?
2013
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
18
Affect of Not Extending PTC
With no PTC extension this year, the U.S. wind market will shrink
significantly in 2013
Annual installations will be 2 GW in 2013, down from >8 GW in 2012.
Total wind supported jobs will drop by nearly half, from 78,000 in 2012 to 41,000 in 2013
Total wind investment will drop by nearly two-thirds, from $15.6 billion in 2012 to $5.5 billion in 2013
With a 4 year PTC extension, the U.S. wind market will grow through
2016
Annual installations will be 8-10 GW through 2016
Total wind supported jobs will grow to 95,000 by 2016
Total wind investment will grow to $16.3 billion in 2016
Source: Impact of the Production Tax Credit on the U.S. Wind Market, Naigant Inc, (December 2011), Prepared for the
American Wind Energy Association
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
19
Future Electric Capacity Needs Through 2035 -
Can Renewables Compete?
EIA predicts 60% of new
additions will be natural gas;
25% renewable; 11% coal; 3%
nuclear; and 1% “other”
223 gigawatts of need filled
primarily with gas and
renewable capacity
But?
Source: EIA, Annual Energy Outlook 2011
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
20
Competition from Natural Gas
Shale gas production increasing
17% per year growth 2000 - 2006;
accelerating to 48% per year,
2006 to 2010
Largely attributed to advances in
technologies, primarily horizontal
drilling and
Hydraulic fracturing, which have
opened up plays in a number of
different basins that were not
previously considered due to
economics
Gas prices leveling off:
Source: EIA, Annual Energy Outlook 2011
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
21
Renewable generation industry will be faced with a
choice in the upcoming years:
or
Compete with natural gas
based upon cost.
Form partnerships with natural gas for a
new generation of baseload facilities.
Gas v.
Renewable
Gas and
Renewable
bhfs.com John A. Herrick, May 14, 2012 - WREC Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
22
Contact:
John Herrick, Esq.
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
Denver, Colorado - Washington, DC
(303) 223-1122
U.S. Renewable Law and Policy: Catch Up or The Clock Strikes Midnight!
Jeff Thaler Visiting Professor of Energy Policy, Law & Ethics
University of Maine
(207) 228-8539
May 14, 2012
1) Why Should We Care if U.S. Renewable Energy “Catches Up”?
2) How Can We Level the Cost Playing Field For Renewables vs. Fossil Fuels?
3) What Are Some of Renewable Energy’s Permitting Hurdles To Fix?
4) When? Actions to Take to Tilt the Regulatory Playing Field for Renewables to Catch Up– Now!
1) Why Should We Care if U.S. Renewable Energy
“Catches Up”? Many Critical Reasons…..
UN Secty. General Ban Ki-Moon, 12/11/09
Climate change is by far the most important and fundamental issue affecting all of our lives. It affects core development issues: poverty, water scarcity, disease, regional and political instability, global health. All of these issues are interconnected. [If we take on climate change], we can be in a much better position to address and resolve all of these issues. Climate change affects the future of humanity, and it affects the future of the planet Earth.
IEA Tracking Clean Energy Progress 4/12
We have a responsibility and a golden opportunity to act,” said IEA Deputy Executive Director Ambassador Richard H Jones. “Energy-related CO2 emissions are at historic highs; under current policies, we estimate that energy use and CO2 emissions would increase by a third by 2020, and almost double by 2050. This would likely send global temperatures at least 6°C higher. Such an outcome would confront future generations with significant economic, environmental and energy security hardships – a legacy that I know none of us wishes to leave behind.” http://www.iea.org/papers/2012/Tracking_Clean_Energy_Progress.pdf
What Would Six Degrees Look Like?
1⁰C Lose many tropical coral reefs and mountain glaciers
2⁰C Greenland ice sheet reaches point of unstoppable melt; Europe heat waves; 75% Reduced Sierra Nevada snow pack
3⁰C Tipping Point? Parts of Amazon rainforest collapse due to cycles of drought and fires
4⁰C Arctic ice cap melts; Permafrost esp. Siberian releases GHGs; Glacier fed rivers largely dry up
5⁰C Coastal cities severely flood during seasonal storms from sea level rise; more desertification
6⁰C Many species face extinction
Lynas Links and Thaler Moral:
• http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2007/apr/23/scienceandnature.climatechange
• http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/sixdegrees/interactive.html
We are fiddling while the world slowly, but increasingly, burns.
Doomsday Clock graph. The lower the graph becomes, the higher the probability of catastrophe is deemed to be: Now at 5 minutes to Midnight. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doomsday_Clock)
Climate Change Also Is a Health Threat
--Humans depend on a safe climate for clean and plentiful water to drink and air to breathe, good soil for food, strong health, jobs, and a sustainable society for our children and theirs.
--Ocean resources depend on a safe climate to reduce exposure to increasing acidification and temperatures, and Forest resources to avoid spreading insect pest ranges, significant habitat losses, and resultant economic losses.
2) How Can Law and Policy Level the Cost Playing Field for Renewables Versus Fossil-Based Sources?
Let Us Count The Ways…..
From the International Energy Administration’s Tracking Clean Energy Progress Report,
April 2012
To move clean-energy technologies to the mainstream market: You must Level the playing field for clean energy technologies. This means ensuring that energy prices reflect the “true cost” of energy – accounting for the positive and negative impacts of energy production and consumption. [BUT HOW?]
http://www.iea.org/papers/2012/Tracking_Clean_Energy_Progress.pdf
One Cost: Relative Carbon
Dioxide Emisssions
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Coa
lOil
Diese
l Fuel
Gas
olin
e
Pro
pane
Nat
ura
l Gas
Sol
ar
Win
d
Hyd
ropower
lbs
CO
2/m
illi
on
BT
U
Carbon Dioxide Emitted Per Quantity of Energy by Fuel Source (derived from the Energy Information Administration, “Voluntary Reporting of
Greenhouse Gases Program”
Renewables and Carbon Emissions
We know wind, hydro, tidal, geothermal, and solar power generally do not directly emit carbon emissions– but what about biofuels?
16
GHGs from direct & indirect land-use change/energy crop http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v1/n8/fig_tab/nclimate12
65_F1.html
2009 National Research Council “Hidden Costs of Energy”
--Non-climate damages estimated to be $120 Billion in 2005 (human health, grain crop, timber yields, building materials, recreation, visibility of outdoor vistas) --$62 Billion Coal electricity generation & $740 MM Natural Gas --$56 Billion from ground transportation (oil-petroleum) --$1.4 Billion from Heating with Natural Gas
--There are also many important policy issues which are not priced externalities:
- Indirect food price effects of biofuels - Oil supply and price shocks
National Research Council Conclusions --Non-climate damages from electricity generation and transportation exceed $120 billion (2005)-- principally related to emissions of NOx, SO2, PM.
--That is a substantial underestimate because it does not include damages related to climate change, health effects of hazardous pollutants, ecosystem effects, or infrastructure and national security.
--Climate damages vary greatly depending on the discount rate and the relationship between warming and GDP impacts. If the unit damage is more than $30/ton of CO2-eq, climate damages would likely be at least as large as non-climate damages.
http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=12794
Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions
(g CO2eq/kWh) 20
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Adapted from: Jacobson, M. Review of solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy security, Energy &
Environmental Science, 2008
Social Costs ($/kWh)
Sources: Energy Information Administration (2010); Epstein, P.R. et al (2011); Howarth, R.W., et al. (2011); Muller, N. Z., et al. (2011); National Research Council, U.S. National Academy of Sciences (2009); Stern, N (2006); Weitzman, M.L (2007).
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
Wind NGCC NGCC highCO2
Oil/gasTurbine
Coal
Justice &Insurance
Health &EnvironmentalCosts
Private Costs
Intergenerational justice
Insurance against catastrophe (Stern)
Fracking Health
?
One Tool: State Renewable & Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards (Not Federal)
http://www.c2es.org/what_s_being_done/in_the_states/rps.cfm
23
* Renewable CHP systems are eligible; fossil-fueled CHP systems are not eligible.
‡Includes only those states that allow fuel cells using nonrenewable energy sources of hydrogen. Some states allow only renewable fuel cells (Arizona,
California, Colorado, Delaware, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, Wisconsin) as eligible technologies.
Source: U.S. EPA Clean Energy-Environment Guide to Action (2006), Database of State Incentives for Renewable Energy (DSIRE) last accessed July
2007,
Resource Eligibility Eligibility of technologies varies by state and depends on whether an energy resource or technology supports state goals.
Another Tool: U.S. Production Tax Credits by Source
Resource Type In-Service Deadline Credit Amount
Wind December 31, 2012 2.2¢/kWh
Closed-Loop Biomass December 31, 2013 2.2¢/kWh
Open-Loop Biomass December 31, 2013 1.1¢/kWh
Geothermal Energy December 31, 2013 2.2¢/kWh
Landfill Gas December 31, 2013 1.1¢/kWh
Municipal Solid Waste December 31, 2013 1.1¢/kWh
Qualified Hydroelectric December 31, 2013 1.1¢/kWh
Marine and Hydrokinetic (150 kW or larger)**
December 31, 2013 1.1¢/kWh
Third Tool to Adjust: Fossil v Renewable Subsidies http://www.eli.org/pdf/Energy_Subsidies_Black_Not_Green.pdf
3) What Are Some of Renewable Energy’s Permitting Hurdles That Need To Be Fixed?
Let’s Look at Ocean Energy….
FERC Tidal Pilot (<5MW, <5yrs) Licensing Flow Chart http://www.ferc.gov/industries/hydropower/gen-
info/licensing/hydrokinetics/energy-pilot.asp
(Some) U. S. Federal Law and Policy Hurdles for Offshore Wind
• National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) • Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Lease (BOEM) • Endangered Species Act (ESA) • Magnuson Stevens Fishery Convention & Management Act • Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act • National Marine Sanctuaries Act • Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 • Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) • Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) • Clean Air Act (CAA) • Clean Water Act (CWA) • National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) • Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) • Fishery Conservation and Management Act (FCMA) • Executive Order 12114: Environmental Effects Abroad • Executive Order 12898: Environmental Justice • Executive Order 13007: Indian Sacred Sites • Executive Order 13089: Coral Reef Protection
Federal Endangered Species Act Hurdles
-- Prohibits the “take” of a species federally listed as threatened or endangered.
-- “Take” means to harass, harm, pursue, wound, kill, capture or collect– or to disrupt normal behavioral patterns or significantly impair essential behavioral patterns
-- “Take” through “harm” can also include by impactful habitat modification
-- Incidental Take Permit then required—Can Require Years of Studies and Processing
Federal Marine Mammal Protection Act --Prohibits “taking” of marine mammals unless specifically permitted by law;
--Incidental take protection can be sought—again, multiple requirements and months or longer.
Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act --Prohibits the “taking” of migratory birds;
--No incidental take permit available; need to explore possible special purpose permit options.
-- Risk of prosecution if a bird is “taken” is a hotly debated topic today
Additional State (ie Maine) Requirements, Even for Projects in Federal Waters, Include:
-- Multiple statutory approvals for cabling running within 3 miles of State lands….
-- Also for Any Onshore or Near-shore Assembly and Staging Areas That May Impact State Waters or Land (Including Islands)
FOR EXAMPLE:
Site Location of Development Act
--Need Dept. of Envtl. Protection Site Location of Development Permit, but no expedited permitting process;
--Must show, in part, no adverse effect on natural environment, scenic character, natural resources in the area;
--Also adequate provision to fit development harmoniously into existing natural environment.
Permitting Result?
Multiple years, Multiple Types and Levels of Approvals Required, Multiple Degrees of Developer and Financier Uncertainty, Risks, and Higher Costs, and Multiple Ways for Renewable Projects to Never Get Steel into the Ground or Water
4) Actions to Take to Tilt the Playing
Field for Renewables to Catch Up–
Now!
More than a Level Field with Fossils Needed– 5 Minutes to Midnight
Must Tilt the Field to Faster, Expedited and One-Stop Reviews for Permit and Lease Approvals…Some Experts’ Ideas…..
UMaine Students’ Ideas --Streamline permitting and regulatory review ie one stop permitting, expedited timelines and zoning(ie Maine wind); time limits for issuance of permit decisions or else approved for renewable projects. Use rebuttable presumptions. --Enact National Renewable Portfolio Standard --Rebuttable Presumption that interference with a neighbor’s solar access is a legal nuisance --More $$ for generation and distribution efficiency initiatives --End fossil subsidies; impose carbon tax based on true social costs of energy source; Long term subsidy policy for all renewable energy, staggered- higher in beginning, lower overtime
More Students’ Ideas --Kyoto Protocol—US sign it! --Carbon offsets: Mandatory, not optional, ie for air flights, car travel, etc. --Education efforts using social media to emphasize local impacts of climate change; Be more visible, concrete, ie calculate # tons of carbon emissions you or a business do a year, then create something of that weight/appearance and install in front yard, lobby, etc -- Choice visuals: oil refinery nearby vs favorite mtn top leveled for coal vs on or offshore wind farm --Start earlier than college on climate change, sustainability educating ie elementary schools
Or We Could Learn from The Mouse That Roared….
Denmark --Danish Energy Authority is A Single Agency Overseeing Permitting, Transmission, Incentives
-- 30% Investment Tax Credit (‘79-’89); Feed-In Tariff (‘81-onward), Carbon Tax (‘92)
--Long-Term Wind Financing if Use Danish Turbines
--Each municipality must plan 75MW wind capacity
--Turbine-owner & Utility share Grid connection costs
--Mandatory Efficiency regs, more Cogeneration
--Long-term, consistent energy financing policies encourage investment and R&D
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-june-16-2010/an-energy-independent-future
The End?
By Contrast: U.S. “Clean” Energy Policy: After 8 Presidents’ Speeches, Time’s A Wasting to Turn Back the
Doomsday Clock