We enable more people to bike���for safer, ���healthier, ���

and more prosperous���communities for all.

CalBike’s Affiliate Network

Singular goal since 2012:���to double biking by 2017

#1 Strategy: Build the Infrastructure

Bicycle Transportation Account

portion of Enhancements

portion of Safe Routes to Schools portion of other categories

everything else

Bike Coalition considers ATP

•  Con: loss of dedicated funding category – No more Bicycle Transportation Account – Loss of significant planning requirement

•  Pro: More money for active transportation – More political attention – Bigger potential projects

Mission Vision Goal Strategy 1234

b. Build high-quality networks

Mission Vision Goal Strategy 1234

b. Build high-quality networks

1990 census

2000 census

2005-2009 ACS

2006-2010 ACS

2007-2011 ACS

2008-2012 ACS

ATP funding results

ATP funding results

7.2 7.2

36.1

23.7

0 5

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Bike/Ped Bike-only

TE BTA

ATP funding results

Out of $221M (60%) in Statewide & Small Urban/Rural pots:

•  $103 million is allocated to 62 projects to build or plan bike/ped infrastructure

•  $12 million goes to 13 stand-alone bike projects

•  $44 million goes to stand-alone bike projects plus multi-use trails

ATP funding results

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

pre-ATP ATP

100% ATP .6ATP mixed .6ATP paths .6ATP bike only TE mixed TE bike only BTA

Bike Coalition evaluates ATP

•  Stand-alone bike projects probably got less money

•  Mixed projects probably got more money •  No network-based projects were funded,

but there were some big projects funded – Top 5 got $36.4 million (16% of funds) – Top 10% got $75.3 million (34% of funds) – 11 of the top 15 projects were bike/ped

combined projects

Conclusions

•  Needs more money •  Need to incent network-based projects

Active Transportation Program everything else