california department of education pre-state allocation board meeting may 25, 2011 presented by
TRANSCRIPT
California Department of Education
Pre-State Allocation Board MeetingMay 25, 2011
Presented By
School Facility Program Funds Available
(in millions) Apr. 2011 May. 2011
Nov 2010 Bond Sale $234.1 $140.3
March 2010 Bond Sale 213.6 193.7
Nov/Dec 2009 Bond Sales 27.5 27.5
Oct/Nov 2009 Bond Sales 85.2 75.2
April 2009 Bond Sale 64.0 64.0
March 2009 Bond Sale 0.07 0.07
Total Funds Available $624.5 $500.8
Status of Bond Authority
Propositions 1D, 55 & 47New Construction Bond Authority - $14.674 billion*
(in millions)
Remaining Bond Authority, $504.9
Unfunded Approvals, $553.9
Apportioned, $13,615.2
New Construction TotalsProp 1D 1,667.7$ Seismic Repair 4.7$ Prop 55 5,034.7$ Prop 47 6,908.1$
Apportioned 13,615.2$ Prop 1D 29.9$ Seismic Repair -$ Prop 55 453.0$ Prop 47 71.0$
Unfunded Approvals 553.9$ Prop 1D 2.9$ Seismic Repair 194.8$ Prop 55** 268.2$ Prop 47 39.0$
Remaining Bond Authority 504.9$ Grand Total 14,674.0$
Agenda Highlights
• Career Technical Education Facilities Program Remaining Bond Authority
• Overcrowding Relief Grant Program Funding
• Priorities in School Construction Funding/Cash Management
• Seismic Mitigation Program Subcommittee Update
• State Allocation Board Rules and Procedures Subcommittee
Questions and Answers
State Allocation Board MeetingMay 25, 2011
Pre-Meeting: DSA Updates
Upcoming fee changes: High Performance Incentive Grant Program
Effective July 1, 2011
Details – Bulletin forthcoming (June 1, 2011)
Current Fee Structure: based on project size (square feet)
Proposed Fee Structure: based on points claimed for HPI Grant
Division of the State Architect
Pre-eTracker Projects Available
Division of the State Architect
Bin Status Reports as of May 19, 2011
Structural Bin Times (weeks)
Region
Category
1 2 3
Oakland 5.0 1.1 4.4
Sacramento 4.8 - 5.0
Los Angeles 4.3 - 5.3
San Diego 6.0 - 6.0
Reported Statewide Average: 5.3
Division of the State Architect
Bin Status Reports as of May 19, 2011
Fire & Life Safety (weeks)
Region
Category
1 2 3
Oakland 5.0 3.7 4.7
Sacramento 7.5 8.2 10.1
Los Angeles 8.1 - 8.1
San Diego 8.2 7.0 9.0
Reported Statewide Average: 8.1
Division of the State Architect
Bin Status Reports as of May 19, 2011
Access Bin Times (weeks)
Region
Category
1 2 3
Oakland 5.0 3.7 5.0
Sacramento 6.9 7.2 7.1
Los Angeles 8.1 - 8.1
San Diego 8.2 5.0 8.5
Reported Statewide Average: 7.2
Department of General ServicesDivision of the State ArchitectPlan Review Scorecard Summary Chartsas of April 29, 2011
ProjectSchool District
Incomplete DaysDSA Bin Time Days
DSA Plan Review Days
Design Professional
Correction Days
DSA & Design Professional Back
Check Days
Stamp Out/ Approval
Total Processing Days
Access Only 6 27 9 45 4 - 91 Over-the-Counter (OTC) - 1 1 8 1 - 11 0 - $1,000,000 8 33 12 71 9 1 134 $1,000,001 - $5,000,000 17 39 28 80 14 1 179 $5,000,001 and larger 22 41 56 76 25 3 223
Average Processing Days 7 21 13 46 8 1 96
- 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Calendar Days
Access Only School District Incomplete Days
DSA Bin Time Days
DSA Plan Review Days
Design Professional Correction Days
DSA & Design Professional Back Check Days
Stamp Out/ Approval
Department of General ServicesDivision of the State ArchitectPlan Review Scorecard Summary Chartsas of April 29, 2011
ProjectSchool District
Incomplete DaysDSA Bin Time Days
DSA Plan Review Days
Design Professional
Correction Days
DSA & Design Professional Back
Check Days
Stamp Out/ Approval
Total Processing Days
Access Only 6 27 9 45 4 - 91 Over-the-Counter (OTC) - 1 1 8 1 - 11 0 - $1,000,000 8 33 12 71 9 1 134 $1,000,001 - $5,000,000 17 39 28 80 14 1 179 $5,000,001 and larger 22 41 56 76 25 3 223 Average Processing Days 7 21 13 46 8 1 96
- 2 4 6 8 10 12
Calendar Days
OTC School District Incomplete Days
DSA Bin Time Days
DSA Plan Review Days
Design Professional Correction Days
DSA & Design Professional Back Check Days
Stamp Out/ Approval
Department of General ServicesDivision of the State ArchitectPlan Review Scorecard Summary Chartsas of April 29, 2011
ProjectSchool District
Incomplete DaysDSA Bin Time Days
DSA Plan Review Days
Design Professional
Correction Days
DSA & Design Professional Back
Check Days
Stamp Out/ Approval
Total Processing Days
Access Only 6 27 9 45 4 - 91 Over-the-Counter (OTC) - 1 1 8 1 - 11 0 - $1,000,000 8 33 12 71 9 1 134 $1,000,001 - $5,000,000 17 39 28 80 14 1 179 $5,000,001 and larger 22 41 56 76 25 3 223 Average Processing Days 7 21 13 46 8 1 96
- 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Calendar Days
$0 - $1,000,000,000 School District Incomplete Days
DSA Bin Time Days
DSA Plan Review Days
Design Professional Correction Days
DSA & Design Professional Back Check Days
Stamp Out/ Approval
Department of General ServicesDivision of the State ArchitectPlan Review Scorecard Summary Chartsas of April 29, 2011
ProjectSchool District
Incomplete DaysDSA Bin Time Days
DSA Plan Review Days
Design Professional
Correction Days
DSA & Design Professional Back
Check Days
Stamp Out/ Approval
Total Processing Days
Access Only 6 27 9 45 4 - 91 Over-the-Counter (OTC) - 1 1 8 1 - 11 0 - $1,000,000 8 33 12 71 9 1 134 $1,000,001 - $5,000,000 17 39 28 80 14 1 179 $5,000,001 and larger 22 41 56 76 25 3 223 Average Processing Days 7 21 13 46 8 1 96
- 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Calendar Days
$1,000,001 - $5,000,000 School District Incomplete Days
DSA Bin Time Days
DSA Plan Review Days
Design Professional Correction DaysDSA & Design Professional Back Check DaysStamp Out/ Approval
Department of General ServicesDivision of the State ArchitectPlan Review Scorecard Summary Chartsas of April 29, 2011
ProjectSchool District
Incomplete DaysDSA Bin Time Days
DSA Plan Review Days
Design Professional
Correction Days
DSA & Design Professional Back
Check Days
Stamp Out/ Approval
Total Processing Days
Access Only 6 27 9 45 4 - 91 Over-the-Counter (OTC) - 1 1 8 1 - 11 0 - $1,000,000 8 33 12 71 9 1 134 $1,000,001 - $5,000,000 17 39 28 80 14 1 179 $5,000,001 and larger 22 41 56 76 25 3 223 Average Processing Days 7 21 13 46 8 1 96
- 50 100 150 200 250
Calendar Days
$5,000,001 and larger School District Incomplete Days
DSA Bin Time Days
DSA Plan Review Days
Design Professional Correction Days
DSA & Design Professional Back Check Days
Stamp Out/ Approval
THANK YOU
California Department of Education Update
School Facilities Planning Division
May 25, 2011
Topics• Schools of the Future Initiative
• CDE Field Representative (Consultant) exam
• Drinking Water
• Safe Routes to School
• Department of Toxic Substance Control
• Title 5 Design Principle
Schools of the Future Initiative• Advisory panels convened by
Superintendent Torlakson
• Schools of the Future Task Force
met for second time on April 18, 2011
Schools of the Future Initiative
High Performance Schools Sub-Committee• Financing• Renewable Energy• High Efficiency Schools• Grid Neutral Schools
Schools of the Future Initiative
School Facility Program Reform Sub-Committee• Funding and Governance• School Site Selection and Community
Impact• Modernization• Educational Impact of Design
Schools of the Future Task Force
Next Steps:
--Final Meeting on June 1, 2011
--Report and recommendations to the Superintendent
CDE Recruitment
•Exam for Field Representative and Assistant Field Representative (Consultant)
– Establishes eligibility for future hiring
– Check “What’s New” for application
CDE Recruitment
Minimum qualifications:1. Teaching credential
or Masters/doctorate in:
– Business Administration– Public Administration – Related field
2. Three years related professional experience
CDE Recruitment
ContactsEligibility and Application Information Jeffrey Thorne
916-445-8546 or [email protected]
Job InformationFred Yeager916-327-7148 or
Drinking Water
SB 1413 (Leno) created
Education Code Section 38086
By July 1, 2011, free, fresh drinking water must be made available to students during meal time.
Drinking Water
See CDE guidance at: http://www.cde.ca.gov/ls/fa/sf/whatsnew.asp.
Contact: Nutrition Services Division Robin Carboni, Child Nutrition Consultant, 916-322-3195 or [email protected]
Mike Danzik,
Nutrition Education Specialist,
916-445-7346 or [email protected].
Safe Routes to School
Safe Routes to School $42 million in Federal SRTS Cycle 3 Funds: Application Eligibility: City/ County/Metropolitan Planning Organization; Regional Transportation Planning Agency serving as responsible agency and partner to Project Sponsor such as School District, County Public Health Agency and other non-profit organizations.
Application Deadline: Thursday July 15, 2011
Safe Routes to SchoolUpdated SRTS Guidelines and Applicationhttp://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/saferoutes/saferoutes.htm
California Safe Routes to School Technical Assistance Resource Center (TARC) http://www.casaferoutestoschool.org/
Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) http://tims.berkeley.edu/resources/srts/main.php
Change in Department of Toxic Substances Control Contact
Send Phase 1 reports and requests for environmental oversight agreements to:
Ellen DelMar, Phase I CoordinatorBrownfields and Environmental Restoration Program Department of Toxic Substances Control5796 Corporate AvenueCypress, CA 90630(714) [email protected]
See: http://www.cde.ca.gov/ls/fa/sf/dtscrequirephase1.asp
Title 5 Design PrincipleCalifornia Code of Regulations, 14030 (d):•Delivery and service areas shall be located to provide vehicular access that does not jeopardize the safety of students and staff
– Delivery/utility vehicles have direct access from the street to the delivery area without crossing over playground or field area or interfering with bus or parent loading unless a fence or other barrier protects students from large vehicle traffic on playgrounds
– Trash pickup is fence or otherwise isolated and away from foot traffic areas.
Title 5 Design PrincipleDoes NOT meet Title 5
Student and vehicle conflict
Drawing is for illustrative purposes only
Title 5 Design PrincipleMeets Title 5 but creates loss of playground
Title 5 Design PrincipleMeets Title 5
Title 5 Design Principle
• Select sites of adequate size and that will allow delivery access that is compliant with Title 5.
•Make sure early planning of site ensures access that is compliant with Title 5.