calibration of goes-r abi cloud products and trmm/gpm observations to ground- based radar rainfall...

16
Calibration of GOES-R ABI cloud products and TRMM/GPM observations to ground-based radar rainfall estimates for the MRMS system – Status and future plans Heather Grams, Pierre Kirstetter CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK J.J. Gourley, Robert Rabin NOAA/NSSL, Norman, OK

Upload: lane-dormer

Post on 14-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Calibration of GOES-R ABI cloud products and TRMM/GPM

observations to ground-based radar rainfall estimates for the MRMS

system – Status and future plans

Heather Grams, Pierre KirstetterCIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK

J.J. Gourley, Robert RabinNOAA/NSSL, Norman, OK

2

146 WSR-88Ds 30 Canadian Radars

The Multi-Radar/Multi-Sensor System (MRMS)

QPE Products Instantaneous Precip Type/Rate Radar QPE (1 hr – 10-day accums) Gauge QPE Local gauge-adjusted radar QPE Gauge + orographic pcp climatology

QPE

Domain: 20-55°N, 130-60°W

Resolution 0.01°lat x 0.01°long 2 min update cycle

~ 9000 hourly gauges~ 8000 daily gauges

Data Sources ~180 radars every 4-5min ~9000 gauges every hour RAP model hourly 3D analyses Satellite and lightning: optional

Operational at NCEP: 10/2014

3

Flooded Locations And Simulated Hydrographs (FLASH) A CONUS-wide flash-flood forecasting system – Operational at NCEP

2015

Stormscale Rainfall Observations (MRMS)

Stormscale Distributed Hydrologic Models

Probabilistic Forecast Return Periods and Estimated Impacts

10-11 June 2010, Albert Pike Rec Area, Arkansas

10”

8”6”

Hydrograph of Simulated and Observed Discharge

Simulated surface water flow

20 fatalities

80%

60%40%

Probability of life-threatening flash flood

t=2300

t=0000

t=0100

Q2

Q5

5 hr

4

5

Winter Summer

6

Impact of missing data on calibration

7

Filling Gaps with Satellite QPE?

Renewed Opportunity with GOES-R Spatiotemporal resolution improvements for flash

flood scale 15 min 5 min over CONUS 4 km 2 km for ABI-derived products

Geostationary Lightning Mapper Convective/Stratiform Precip Type Segregation in data-

sparse areas

Expanded list of cloud properties from ABI: Cloud top height, temperature, phase, pressure;

emissivity, effective radius, optical depth, etc.

~ MRMS scale

MRMS Calibrated GOES-R/TRMM Rainfall

Complementary Observing Systems

Geostationary Satellites (GOES)

TRMM/GPM PR

MRMS mosaic of ground radars + environment + gauges

Advantages of GOES/GOES-R:• Rapidly updating (5-15

minutes)• Full CONUS coverage and

beyond

Advantages of TRMM/GPM:• Fine-scale vertical profiles

through cloud to surface• PR products

complementary to NEXRAD

Advantages of MRMS:• Near-surface

observations• High spatiotemporal

resolution• Precip/No Precip QC

9

GOES Inputs: Derived cloud properties

GOES-13 Proxy of GOES-R ABI cloud products (parallax-corrected)

Cloud Top Height/Temperature/Pressure

Cloud Top Phase Cloud Top Emissivity Optical Depth/Effective Radius

(daytime only)

Geostationary Lightning Mapper Convective/Stratiform Precip

Type Segregation in data-sparse areas

TRMM LIS available for training period

10

MRMS Inputs: Near-surface rainfall properties

Surface precipitation • Rainfall Rate

• Precipitation Type (conv/strat/tropical/hail/snow/BB)

• Radar Quality Index

• Quality Control of Precip/No-Precip

3-D Reflectivity Mosaic• Vertical Profiles of

Reflectivity

11

TRMM/GPM Inputs: Vertical structure of precipitation

TRMM Precipitation Radar • 2A25 Version 7 vertical

profiles of attenuation-corrected reflectivity factor

• Rain Type

GPM Dual-Frequency Radar• Full CONUS coverage

• Better characterization of particle size distributions and precipitation phase

Lightning Imaging Sensor• Identification of convective

rainfall

(Photo Credit: JAXA/NASA)

12

MRMS Calibrated GOES-R/TRMM Rainfall

• Preprocessing of Datasetsa. Remap all inputs to GOES resolution

b. Derive S-band-like vertical profiles of reflectivity from Ku-band TRMM PR (Wen et al. 2013)

c. Filter by precip type and NEXRAD coverage quality

• Develop Rainfall Modela. Two versions: TRMM

and no-TRMM

b. Joint-PDF Bayesian

approach

13

Current Status and Future Plans

Year 1: Current work (June 2014)a. Build training archive (1 year initially, up to 3 years available)

b. Database entries of all inputs matched to GOES pixel resolution and scan time

• TRMM pass within 1 hour of GOES scan time

• MRMS rain rate >= 10 mm hr-1

• Radar Quality Index = 1

GOES-RProxyVariables

TRMMPR

MRMSMatchedPixels

14

Current Status and Future Plans

Year 2: Product development and MRMS integrationa. Dec 2014: Prototype CONUS precipitation rates and types

b. Feb 2015: Merge satellite-based rainfall products with MRMS ground-based QPE (RQI-based weighting scheme)

Radar Quality Index 10

NEXRAD QPE

SatelliteQPE

1

Weig

ht

15

Current Status and Future Plans

Year 3: Validation and FLASH integrationa. Evaluate model QPE performance (both with TRMM/GPM

and without)

b. Test blended MRMS QPE+satellite QPE as input to FLASH in real-time

c. After GOES-R launch, adjust model to use real-time GOES-R input (ABI and GLM)

16

Thank you!

Contact: Heather Grams ([email protected])

For more info: http://mrms.ou.edu http://flash.ou.edu