calcutta, 2.2005 j. schukraft1 the quest for the qgp: 20 years of heavy ion physics
TRANSCRIPT
Calcutta, 2.2005 J. Schukraft 1
The quest for the QGP:The quest for the QGP:20 years of heavy ion physics 20 years of heavy ion physics
The quest for the QGP:The quest for the QGP:20 years of heavy ion physics 20 years of heavy ion physics
2
ExplorationsExplorationsSearch for the QGP* Search for a sea passage to India*
world map, late 15th centuryQCD map, late 20th century
A Mid-Fifteenth-Century European World Map (1466)The Mediterranean basin, known to Ptolemy and later Europeans, is fairly accurately depicted, but the Eastern portions of the map are very incomplete since they were based on often-fictitious travelers’ accounts rather than observation. *Original idea from H. Satz and D. Karzheev, Hard probes WS, Portugal, 2004
https://webh04.cern.ch/event-hardprobes04/
3
ExplorersExplorers
‘In 1493, Columbus wrote a brief report concerning his discoveries of "Islands of India beyond the Ganges." It was intended as a public notice to announce his discoveries and to garner support for another voyage. The first edition of this letter was printed in Spanish in Barcelona in April 1493.’ Quote from US library of Congress
Columbus: visionary, enthusiastic adventurer
Not afraid to venture far into the unknown
with little guidance and marginal preparation.
As befits the brave (and lucky), he made a
BIG discovery.
Headline Barcelona News
April 1493
4
ExplorersExplorers
Vasco da Gama: methodical explorer
Building on years of systematic ‘experimental’
discoveries, one step at a time..
As befits the diligent, he reached his goal in due time
1434
1455
1460
1482
1485
1488
For the last leg, VdG was guided
by an Indian pilot, arranged for by
Ahmed ibn Majid in Malindi.
Thomas Kostecki, Vasco da Gama (1998)
5
2020thth Century Explorers Century Explorers
Hans, the visionary adventurer Louis, the systematic explorer Bikash, the Indian pilot
Lessons from the 15th century:
- there are different approaches to make a discovery
-you don’t always findwhat you set out to discover
- when venturing into the unknown, have the Indians ‘on board’
India: Strong and recognized partner in quest for QGP
- > 60 physicists, > 8 Institutes
- participation in SPS, RHIC and LHC programs
- 5th largest nation in ALICE
- strong Theory community
Calcutta 2005 J. Schukraft
6
What are we looking for ?What are we looking for ?
NA35 streamer chamber picture, ca 1990Da Gama arriving in India, 1498
15th century explorers:
direct trade route to the
‘Origin of Spices’
20th century explorers:
understanding the
‘Origins of Matter’
7
QGP: The ‘Original’ State of MatterQGP: The ‘Original’ State of Matter
QGP = true ground state of QCD melting matter => deconfinement study phase diagram of matter melting vaccum (gluon condensate)
=>chiral symmetry restoration
dynamical origin of constituent mass
Phase transitions involving elementary quantum fields
phase transitions and spontaneous symmetry breaking central to HEP
QCD transition is the only one accessible dynamically
Cosmology & Astrophysics early Universe at ~ 1 s interior of neutron stars
new domain of hot & dense QCD surprises ?
8
Melting MatterMelting Matter
9
Elementary Particles 0.1% 12 matter particles (quarks, leptons)
only 4 relevant today (u, d, e, ) 13 force particles (3 massive, 10 massless)
Composite Particles (hadrons) 4% hundreds…
only 2 are relevant (p,n), making nuclei
What stuff is the Universe made of ??
We don’t know how and why for ~ 5%
We don’t even know what for the other 95%
Dark Matter 23% made of unknown particles
Dark Energy 73% vacuum energy
of completely unknown origin should be infinite or exactly 0
The Dark Mystery of Matter The Dark Mystery of Matter
SM Higgs mechanism QCD chiral symmetry breaking
10
Recent Lattice QCD ‘Maps’Recent Lattice QCD ‘Maps’ recent progress
improved actions improved symmetries larger lattices
crit. temperature energy density EOS
Tc ~ 175 ± 8 ± 8 MeV
c ~ (6±2) Tc4
(-3P) 0
11
t = - 3 fm/c t = 0 t = 1 fm/c t = 5 fm/c
t = 10 fm/ct = 40 fm/c
Heavy Ion CollisionHeavy Ion Collision
hard collisions pre-equilibrium QGP
hadron gas
freeze-out
12
?
Calcutta 2005 J. Schukraft
13
Experimental FacilitiesExperimental Facilities AGS (1986 - 1998)
Beam: Elab < 15 GeV/N, s ~ 4 GeV/N Users: 400 Experiments: 4 big, several small
SPS (1986 - 2003) Beam: Elab < 200 GeV/N, s < 20 GeV/N Users: 600 Experiments: 6-7 big, several small
RHIC (>2000) Beam: s < 200 GeV/N Users: 1000 Experiments: 2 big, 2 small
LHC (>2007) Beam: s < 5500 GeV/N Users: 1000 Experiments: 1 dedicated HI, 3 pp expts
X 5
X 10
X 30
14
1434
1455
1460
1482
1485
1488
Roadmap, 3rd ICPA-QGP
Jaipur, March 1997
large systems thousand of particles Volume > 4000 fm3
energy density up to 3 GeV/fm3
strongly interacting system hadronic rescattering collective phenomena (flow) thermal particle ratios f(T, )
signs of ‘new state of matter’ e+e- pairs (chiral symmetry rest. ?) J/ suppression (deconfinement ?)
Very complex reactions
can be measured
and analyzed
Calcutta 2005 J. Schukraft
15
Soft Probes: Elliptic FlowSoft Probes: Elliptic Flow Flow: Correlation between coordinate and momentum space
close particles move at similar velocity and direction flow builds up in an interacting medium with pressure gradients for given boundary conditions, flow profile depends on
Equation of State EoS and viscosity of ‘fluid’ Hydrodynamics of perfect fluid: = 0, = 0 (‘strongly interacting’)
px > py
Elliptic Flow reduces spatialElliptic Flow reduces spatial
anisotropy -> acts at early timesanisotropy -> acts at early times
Calcutta 2005 J. Schukraft
16
First Flow Measurement at SPSFirst Flow Measurement at SPS
WA93/98 PMD detectors measures
azimuthal anisotropy of photonsPresented by Indian group (Y. Viyogi) at QM’95
Particle emission
is correlated !
Implications:Implications: strongly interacting ‘matter’ collective expansion ~1/2 ideal hydrodynamics
Remember Columbus:
-Elliptic Flow not expected at SPS
-PMD meant to look for photon/hadron fluctuations (Centauro like events), discovered flow instead
Calcutta 2005 J. Schukraft
17
Photons: Thermal Photons: Thermal Radiation ?Radiation ?
Thermal photons ‘heat’ radiation from initial hot phase
‘El Dorado’ of QGP physics
rate ~ T4 => sensitive to early phase rate ~ lifetime => contribution from hadronic phase
very challenging measurement high pt: direct QCD hard scattering medium pt: 0 decay photons finally sighted at very low pt ???
Subtraction method,upper limit
Correlation method:
Subtraction method
Predictions
hadronic gasQGP
sumpQCD
Most probable yield (Ro=6 fm)The lowest yield (Ro=0)
WA98
QM 2004
CERN Press release in 2000 on ‘Evidence for new state of matter’‘It is expected that the present "proof by circumstantial evidence" for the existence of a quark-gluon plasma in high energy heavy ion collisions will be further substantiated by more direct measurements (e.g. electromagnetic signals which are emitted directly from the quarks in the QGP) ...’
Calcutta 2005 J. Schukraft
18
Hard Probes: J/Psi suppressionHard Probes: J/Psi suppression
cc c
c
c
c
beams of hard probes:jets, J/ ….
normalmatter
QGP
Perturbative Vacuum
cc
Color Screening
cc
Onset of Deconfinement ?
Ca 1986
Calcutta 2005 J. Schukraft
19
NA44
NA49/Ceres
SPS ExperimentsSPS Experiments
NA49
NA50
Radial expansion, ‘Hubble Flow’
Deconfinementmass generation
Thermal particle ratios f(,T)’
Calcutta 2005 J. Schukraft
20
The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider
Current hunting ground for Quark Gluon Plasma
Calcutta 2005 J. Schukraft
21
RHIC ExperimentsRHIC ExperimentsSTAR
PHENIX
PHOBOSBRAHMS
small angle particles Particle Production
parton energy loss
Elliptic Flow
Calcutta 2005 J. Schukraft
22
Flow at RHICFlow at RHIC
12 , tan ( )cos 2( ) y
xrv
p
p
3 2
31
11 2 cos
2 n rnt t
d N d NE v nd p p dp dy
py
px
Momentum space
matter at RHIC: ~ perfect fluid with ~ zero mean free path ! huge effect (almost 2:1 at high pt) almost perfect agreement with hydro f(impact parameter, pt, particle mass)
STAR PRL 86, (2001) 402
|| < 1.3
0.1 < pt < 2.0
Calcutta 2005 J. Schukraft
23
peripheral
Hard Probes : Jet QuenchingHard Probes : Jet Quenching
hadrons
q
q
hadrons
leading particle NOTsuppressed
leadingparticle NOT suppressed
high pt partons: Vacuum: fragment into hadrons => JETS Matter: additional scattering => more gluon radiation
normal ‘cold’ matter: small effect QGP: strong effect (up to several 10 GeV)
observables of ‘jet quenching’ leading parton looses energy energy shows up in soft partons around jet axis
beams of hard probes:jets, J/ ….
Vacuum
QGP
central
jet quenching measures
‘radiation ‘ length of QGP
dE ~ D2 x L2
D = Debye screening mass
Calcutta 2005 J. Schukraft
24
India or America ?India or America ? SPS/AGS: ‘new state of matter’
solid evidence for collective, thermal hadronic matter new effects: quarkonia suppression & low mass lepton pair spectrum
RHIC: dense (thermalized ?) partonic matter elliptic flow compatible with hydrodynamical limit
Hydro = limit of zero mean-free-path => strongly interacting fluid, gas ! almost ideal fluid, /s ~ 0.1 (much better than water !)
jet quenching compatible with complete absorption from interior strength of interaction seems mysteriously high
Calcutta 2005 J. Schukraft
25
•
RHIC
QCD, early 21st century
QG-Plasma or QG-Molasses ?QG-Plasma or QG-Molasses ? QGP: weakly interacting ‘gas’ of quarks and gluons
deconfined, chiral symmetry restored
sQGP: strongly interacting partonic fluid
Columbus: ‘Having now accomplished the undertaking upon which I set out,…
I advanced forward, thinking that I could find some town - but at length, perceiving that nothing new was likely to appear - I determined to make no further search.’
The journey must go on !The journey must go on !
QCD map, late 20th century
Calcutta 2005 J. Schukraft
26
The Large Hadron Collider
Future place for studying the Quark Gluon Plasma
Calcutta 2005 J. Schukraft
27ALICE Set-upALICE Set-up
HMPID
Muon Arm
TRD
PHOS
PMD
ITS
TOF
TPC
Size: 16 x 26 m
Weight: 10,000 tons
Calcutta 2005 J. Schukraft
28
ALICE CollaborationALICE Collaboration
UKPORTUGAL
JINR
GERMANY
SWEDENCZECH REP.
HUNGARYNORWAY
SLOVAKIAPOLANDNETHERLANDS
GREECE
DENMARKFINLAND
SWITZERLAND
RUSSIA CERN
FRANCE
MEXICOCROATIA ROMANIA
CHINA
USAARMENIA
UKRAINE
INDIA
ITALYS. KOREA
~ 1000 Members
(63% from CERN MS)
~30 Countries
~80 Institutes
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004
ALICE Collaboration statistics
LoI
MoU
TP
TRD
Calcutta 2005 J. Schukraft
29
The ALICEThe ALICE Magnet: Magnet:
ready for the experiment to move in!ready for the experiment to move in!
Calcutta 2005 J. Schukraft
30
Inside the ALICE TPC
Calcutta 2005 J. Schukraft
31
India in AliceIndia in AlicePMD prototype
Manas electronics chip
Muon Chamber
Calcutta 2005 J. Schukraft
32
•
RHIC
Past-Present-Past-Present-FutureFuture
AGS/SPS: 1986 – 1994AGS/SPS: 1986 – 1994 existence & properties of hadronic phase
chemical & thermal freeze-out, collective flow,…
SPS: 1994 – 2003SPS: 1994 – 2003 ‘compelling evidence for new state of matter with many properties predicted for QGP’
J/ suppression (deconfinement ?) low mass lepton pairs (chiral restoration ?)
RHIC: 2000 - ?RHIC: 2000 - ? compelling evidence -> establishing the (s)QGP ?
parton flow, parton energy loss
LHC: 2007 - ??LHC: 2007 - ?? ‘go west’ or find the ‘Island of India beyond the Ganges’ precision spectroscopy of ‘ideal plasma ‘QGP
heavy quarks (c,b), Jets, Y, thermal photons
1434
1455
1460
1482
1485
1488
We are on an exciting and wondrous exploration,
not taking any chances:
We have the Indian pilot and his crew ‘on board’