calcium looping post combustion co2 capture: a promising … · 2017. 10. 20. · calcium looping...

14
Prof. Dr. techn. G. Scheffknecht Institute of Combustion and Power Plant Technology M. Hornberger , H. Dieter, G. Scheffknecht The 6 th High Temperature Solid Looping Cycles Network Meeting, September 1 st , 2015, Milan Calcium Looping Post Combustion CO 2 Capture: A promising technology for emission free cement production

Upload: others

Post on 05-Feb-2021

8 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Prof. Dr. techn. G. Scheffknecht

    Institute of Combustion and Power Plant Technology

    M. Hornberger, H. Dieter, G. Scheffknecht

    The 6th High Temperature Solid Looping Cycles Network Meeting,

    September 1st, 2015, Milan

    Calcium Looping Post Combustion CO2 Capture:

    A promising technology for emission free

    cement production

  • 2

    Expertise in Lime based Fluidized Bed Processes

    Fluidized Bed Processes

    Calcium Looping (CaL)

    Chemical Looping (CLC)

    Oxy-fuel CFB

    Sorption enhanced reforming (SER)

    Oxy-fuel SER

    Fuels

    Biomass

    Waste

    Lignite / Coal

    Measurement techniques

    Sorbent Characterization (TGA)

    Online gas analysis:

    CO2, CO, O2, H2, CH4, SOx, NOx Non-condensable HC: GC

    Tar: wet chemical & online (FID)

    H2S, HCl, NH3: wet chemical

    200 kWth DFB Pilot

    Facility20 kWth electrically heated

    DFB System

    5 kWth electrically heated

    FB batch System

  • Calcium Looping – Post Combustion CCS

    Flue

    Gas

    Air

    Coal

    ASU

    O2

    N2

    CO2-lean

    Flue Gas

    CO2-rich Flue Gas

    CO2 to Storage

    CaCO3

    CaO

    Calciner

    T = 900 °CCaCO3 + Heat CO2 + CaO

    CO2Conditioning

    Make-up Limestone

    Purge

    Carbonator

    T = 650 °CCO2 + CaO CaCO3 + Heat

    CoalAir

    Power Plant

    G 1

    Steam Generator

    CaL Steam Generator

    G 2

    retrofitting to existing facilities

    low CO2 separation cost

    low efficiency penalty3

  • Calcium Looping – Post Combustion CCS

    4

    General conditions

    Looping Ratio: 2 - 10

    Make-up Ratio: < 0,1 - 0,4

    Temperature

    TCalciner: 850 - 1000 °C

    TCarbonator: 600 - 700 °C

    Flue gas

    CO2: ~ 15 %

    F

    B C

    aro

    bn

    ato

    r

    F

    B C

    alc

    ine

    r

    CO2 lean

    Flue Gas

    Flue Gas

    CO2 rich Gas

    CaCO3

    Fuel

    O2

    Steam Cycle

    PurgeAsh

    Air

    Fuel

    Steam Cycle

  • Calcium Looping – Pilot Plant (200 kWth)

    Operation Conditions

    Flue Gas Load: 170 - 230 kWth

    Sorbent Looping Ratio: 3 - 13 molCaO/molCO2

    Total Solid Inventory: 70 - 120 kg CaO/CaCO3

    5

    CaO

    CaCO3

    CO2-rich Gas

    reci.

    Flue Gas

    CO2-lean

    Flue Gas

    O2 + reci.

    Flue Gas

    O2 + reci.

    Flue Gas

    O2 + reci.

    Flue Gas

    Flue

    Gas

    O2

  • Operational Results – Carbonator

    6

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    1000

    Tem

    pe

    ratu

    re [

    °C]

    T Regenerator

    T Carbonator

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    CO

    2 C

    aptu

    re [

    %]

    ECO2

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    8:05 9:05 10:05 11:05 12:05 13:05

    CO

    2C

    on

    c. [

    vol-

    %]

    yCO2, in

    yCO2,out

    Over 90% capture efficiency achieved over a wide range of operating conditions

  • Operational Results – Oxy-fuel Calcination

    7

  • Operational Results – Oxy-fuel Calcination

    8

    High inlet oxygen concentrations

    (> 50 vol.-%,dry) possible

    lower recirculation rates for oxy-

    CaL calcination (additional CO2

    from calcination)

    lower humidity of CaL flue gas

    uniform isothermal conditions

  • Calcium Looping – Pilot Plant (200 kWth)

    Carbonator

    CO2 capture efficiency above 90 %

    Calciner

    CO2 outlet concentrations above 90 vol.-%,dry

    Inlet O2 concentrations above 50 vol.-%,dry

    Excess O2 outlet concentration below 3 vol.-% ,dry

    Operation Conditions

    Flue Gas Load: 170 - 230 kWth

    Sorbent Looping Ratio: 3 - 13 molCaO/molCO2

    Total Solid Inventory: 70 - 120 kg CaO/CaCO3

    9

    CaO

    CaCO3

    CO2-rich Gas

    reci.

    Flue Gas

    CO2-lean

    Flue Gas

    O2 + reci.

    Flue Gas

    O2 + reci.

    Flue Gas

    O2 + reci.

    Flue Gas

    Flue

    Gas

    O2

  • Cement Plant – Clinker Production and Properties

    10

    Mill

    Pre-

    heater

    Rotary Kiln

    Pre-

    calciner

    Cooler

    Fuel Preparation

    Flue Gas

    Fuel

    Air

    Clinker

    Limestone

    Marl /

    ClayAdditive

    Raw

    Meal

    clinker composition

    CaO: 60 - 70 %

    SiO2: 20 - 25 %

    Al2O3: 2 - 6 %

    Fe2O3: 0 - 6 %

    structural change at 1400 °C (rotary kiln)

    CaO + SiO2 (CaO)3 ∙ SiO2 & (CaO)2 ∙ SiO2

    flue gas composition

    high CO2 concentration ~ 30 %

  • Pre-

    heater

    Rotary Kiln

    Pre-

    calciner

    Cooler

    Fuel Preparation

    Fuel

    Air

    Clinker

    FB

    Ca

    rob

    na

    tor

    FB

    Ca

    lcin

    er

    CO2 lean

    Flue GasCO2 rich Gas

    Flue Gas

    CaCO3

    Fuel

    O2 CaO

    Raw Meal

    Marl / Clay

    Additive

    Cement Plant – CaL Integration

    General conditions

    Looping Ratio: 2 - 4

    Make-up Ratio: > 1

    Flue gas

    CO2: 15 - 30 %

    synergy effect between cement plant and CaL-process

    11

  • Summary

    12

    Calcium looping for power plant application demonstrated at pilot plant

    scale

    CO2 capture efficiency over 90 %

    CO2 concentrations over 90 %

    Feasibility for cement plant application will be investigated at pilot plant

    scale

    Effect of high CO2 flue gas concentration

    Influence of make-up ratio, sorbent looping ratio

    Optimal operation conditions

  • Thank you for your attention!

    Acknowledgement

    This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020

    research and innovation programme under grant agreement no 641185

    www.sintef.no/cemcap

    Twitter: @CEMCAP_CO2

    Disclaimer: The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute endorsement of the contents which reflects the

    views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein

    http://www.sintef.no/cemcap

  • Thank you for your interest!

    Any Questions?

    12

    Contact:

    Hornberger Matthias

    Institute of Combustion and Power Plant Technology,

    University of Stuttgart

    [email protected]

    http://www.ifk.uni-stuttgart.de