ca-winter-2011_lores

PRST STDU.S. Postage

PAIDPermit #50

Fort Atkinson, WI

$9.95 Winter 2010/2011Volume 5, No. 2

Lisa Coniglio, PhotoRun.NET

Coaching Winter 11:Coaching Spring 09 1/4/11 11:59 PM

Coaching Winter 11:Coaching Spring 09 1/3/11 1:03 AM

COACHINGCOACHINGCOACHINGCOACHINGCOACHINGAT H L E T I C S qua

rterly

6 Publisher’s Noteby Larry Eder

8 Cross Country Shoesby Cregg Weinmann

10 Hydration and RunningPerformance for Your TeenageRunnerby Roy Stevenson

11 How High School CoachesShould Communicate With Their Athletesby Roy Stevenson

14 How High School Track andField Athletes Should Warm Upby Roy Stevenson

15 Indoor Track of the Yearby Mary Helen Sprecher

17 Outdoor Track of the Yearby Mary Helen Sprecher

19 2010 Fall Shoe Reviewby Cregg Weinmann

25 Dealing with Over-InvolvedParents: Getting Parents toWork with You, not Against You,in High School Track and Fieldby Roy Stevenson

26 Runners’ Injuries and How to Handle Themby Don Kopriva

28 Special Athletes, Special Events by Mary Helen Sprecher

On the cover: David Oliver, photo by Lisa Coniglio, PhotoRun.NET

Volume 5, Number 2Winter 2010/2011

Group Publisher: Larry Eder, [email protected], 920-563-5551, ext. 112

Group Editor: Christine Johnson, [email protected]

Advertising: Larry Eder, [email protected], 608-239-3785

Writers/Contributors: Don Kopriva, Mary Helen Sprecher, Roy Stevenson, Cregg Weinmann

Photographers: Lisa Coniglio/PhotoRun, Victah Sailer/PhotoRun

Layout/Design: Kristen Cerer

Editor: Toby Cook

Pre-Press/Printer: W. D. Hoard & Sons Company, Fort Atkinson, WI

Special Projects: Adam Johnson-Eder, [email protected],

Special Thanks To: Kristen Cerer, Sue Hall, Alex Larsen, Debra Keckeisen, TimGarant, Tom Mack, Mary Ward and Sydney Wesemann

Dedicated to: Fr. Ralph Passerelli, S.J., Jim Marheinecke, Steve Pensinger, Dan Duranteand Terry Ward, a.m.d.g.

phone 608-239-3785; fax 920-563-7298

Coaching Athletics Quarterly is produced, published and owned by Shooting Star

Media, Inc., PO Box 67, Ft. Atkinson, Wisconsin 53538-0067, Christine Johnson,

President, Larry Eder, Vice President. Copyright 2011 by Shooting Star Media, Inc. All

Rights Reserved. Publisher assumes no liability for matter printed, and assumes no

liability or responsibility for content of paid advertising and reserves the right to

reject paid advertising. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not

necessarily those of the Publisher. No part of this publication may be reproduced or

stored in any form without written permission of the Publisher.

Coaching Athletics Quarterly is not related to or endorsed by any other entity or

corporation with a similar name and is solely owned by Shooting Star Media, Inc.

Publisher recommends, as with all fitness and health issues, you consult with your

physician before instituting any changes in your fitness program.

COACHINGCOACHINGCOACHINGCOACHINGCOACHINGAT H L E T I C S qua

rterly

4 Coaching Athletics Quarterly - Spring 2010


6 Coaching Athletics Quarterly - Winter 2010/2011 Photo by: Victah, PhotoRun.NET

publisher’s note

Welcome to the Fall/Winter issue of Coaching Athletics Quarterly. This issue is

coming to you right after the holiday break. I hope that you enjoy the columns from

Roy Stevenson, the ASBA awards, and the footwear updates.

We’re in the midst of planning for 2011. Your next issue will arrive in late February or

early March. Toby Cook and I will be working on these issues and we would love your

input. Please send any suggestions to [email protected].

We wanted to congratulate David Oliver and Allyson Felix for winning the Jesse Owens

Awards for Male & Female Athlete of the Year. We also wanted to congratulate Ashton

Eaton and Queen Harrison for winning the Bowerman Award, which recognizes the

best collegiate athletes of the year. The Bowerman, which is run by the USTFCCCA, is

the Heisman Trophy of collegiate track and field.

We want to also congratulate Brooks Johnson, who just won the Nike Coach of the

Year award. At the recent USATF Hall of Fame dinner, where Brooks took his award, he

was concise in his comments. He thanked all the athletes he coached and noted that,

as with all coaches, he had athletes who got hurt along the way. He also thanked

David Oliver’s mother and the mother of his two sons for being there.

As most of us know, coaching is a rarified profession. I have to admit that I miss not

coaching each and every day. It was the time around the track with my fellow

coaches; it was the moments with my athletes. Those are the moments, some

hilarious, some bittersweet, that one remembers.

As a coach, you not only can make a young athlete a better jumper, sprinter, runner

or thrower, you can also help them on the journey to be a good person. Sport, our

sport of athletics, is about lessons learned, giving it one’s best and, after the

competition, learning from your competitors.

As the late Sam Adams, UCSB’s former director once told me, Coaches are, most of

all, educators.

Larry Eder, Publisher


Cross Country Shoes Fall 2010by Cregg Weinmann

Cross Country 2010 toes the starting line with something fresh—fresh air, fresh school year, and a fresh batch of spikes and flats designed

to dig into the terrain of the toughest courses around. Here we take our annual look at eight newly released or updated cross country

shoes for fall. All are low-profile models that skimp a bit on protection in favor of performance.

Deciding whether you should go for traditional XC spikes or a spikeless model should be based on the racing surfaces you’ll encounter

during your season. Cross country spikes are slightly better than spikeless shoes at gripping muddy or soggy ground, but they are limited

to use on all-natural courses and are not allowed for high school use in California. Spikeless models work almost as well as spikes in the

mud and in addition, they manage pavement, sidewalks, and rocky surfaces and work well on indoor or outdoor tracks. Finally, always try

to get in a few speed sessions in your racing shoes before the actual race, since the low profile of the shoe coupled with the intense effort

of racing can be tough on your soft tissue if you haven’t prepared well. Okay, that’s out of the way, so it’s on to the shoes …

8 Coaching Athletics Quarterly - Winter 2010/2011

adidas XCSThe XCS is the update to the RLH

from a coupleseasons back. The

XCS features thesame Traxion

outersole of the RLHin both a six-spike

configuration and the more versatile spikeless version. The upper isthe same in each: a mini airmesh and a supportive, extended heel

counter with a low-volume, foot-hugging fit. The midsole is loweven for low-profile shoes and is molded EVA. The EVA provides

adequate cushioning on its own, and gets an assist from theTraxion lugs that supply not only traction, but some cushion (viadeflection). The close fit, deft touch of cushioning, and excellent

traction help the foot efficiently negotiate whatever the crosscountry course puts between you and the finish line.

SPIKE/SPIKELESS $60 Sizes: men 7–13,14,15; women 5–12 Weight: (men’s 11) 8.3 oz. spike; 7.8 oz. spikeless;

(women’s 8) 7.5 oz. spike; 7.0 oz. spikeless Fit: snug throughout

ASICS Hyper XC &Hyper Rocketgirl

This update retainsthe same

midsole/outersolein last season’s

version: low-profile,molded EVA and a high-

traction, lugged sole that, judging by thesignificant number of runners who wear them, are extremely

effective. Changes have been implemented in the upper,particularly some upgrades to the meshes which make them

sturdier. The smooth and well-finished interior is supportive andbreathable. The extended heel counter and added medial

overlays deter picking up mud while offering better support thistime around. Overall, the ASICS fit, gender specificity, traction,

and quality deliver good value.

SPIKE $60/SPIKELESS $55 Sizes: men 4–13,14,15; women 5–11,12 Weight: (men’s 11) 9.2 oz. spike, 8.6 oz.

spikeless; (women’s 8) 7.9 oz. spike; 7.3 oz. spikeless Fit: snug heel, close forefoot

Brooks Mach 12The Mach 12 marks the first significant

change in these shoessince version 5 wayback in 2001. Neware the last (the foot

model that the shoe is builtaround) and the pattern of the upper.

These changes align the Mach 12 with theWire, Brooks’ new distance spike, and give the

shoe a bit lower profile. Noticeably morepronounced is the toe spring that propels the foot

forward. The fit has been improved by addingwebbing in the midfoot lacing to better cinch the shoe around the

foot. The interior has a sueded ankle collar and arch wrap thatsecure the foot comfortably—even if you run in them without socks.

The cushioning is familiar: just enough for the varied terrain, but notso much as to add extra weight. In fact, the new midsole and upper

shave almost 10% from a men’s size 11. It all adds up—fit,cushion, weight—to earn our Best Renovation award.

SPIKE/SPIKELESS $65 Sizes: men 5–12; women 5–12 Weight: (men’s 11) 7.6 oz. spike, 6.8 oz. spikeless;

(women’s 8) 6.7 oz. spike, 6.0 oz. spikeless Fit: snug heel, close forefoot

Mizuno Wave Kaze 6Five versions of the Kaze have

integrated the Wave technologywith a breathable,

supportiveupper. And

now we canmake that six.

The Kaze 6 maintainsthe molded EVA midsole with

the modified Wave plate designed for cross country. The luggedoutersole is also carried over in both a 6-spike configuration

and a spikeless version. The new upper features fewer overlays(eliminated to save weight and improve breathability) with a

more sheath-like fit (some runners may want to go up a half-sizefor a more comfortable fit). Runners familiar with the Kaze will

find the performance they expect, while those searching fortraction, good cushioning, and a secure fit have one more

possibility in a racing shoe.

SPIKE/SPIKELESS $80 Sizes: men 7–13; women 6–11 Weight: (men’s 11) 8.9 oz. spike, 7.7 oz. spikeless;

(women’s 8) 7.8 oz. spike, 7.0 oz. spikeless Fit: snug heel, very snug forefoot

FALL 2010

BEST RENOVATION

Cross Country


CREGG WEINMANN is footwear and running products reviewer for Running Network LLC. He can be reached via e-mail at [email protected] © 2011 by Running Network LLC. All Rights Reserved. No part of this article may be stored, copied, or reprinted without prior written permission

of Running Network LLC. Reprinted here with permission.

9Coaching Athletics Quarterly - Winter 2010/2011

Nike Zoom Waffle XC/Racer VII &Zoom Jana Star XC/Waffle

The Waffle Racer pioneeredthe track spike/

racer/crosscountry hybrid.

Version VIIupgrades a few

features while maintaining itsmost effective components. The midsole/outersole is unchanged

with a four-nibbed waffle tread and a co-molded shank thatworks equally on tracks, hills, and dales. The upper’s no-sewtechnology enhances the support with a smooth interior and,though it gains a few grams in the process, it’s a worthwhile

trade-off as the full rand and overlays reinforce the meshthroughout. The fit is unchanged—it’s close—but with good

curvature and snugness to match the racing foot. The matchinglasts of the spiked (Zoom Waffle XC) and spikeless models, thegender specificity of the Jana and Waffle Racer, and broadest

cross country size range in the industry offer runners and teamsa wide variety of XC options.

SPIKE $55/SPIKELESS $45 Sizes: men 1–13,14,15; women 5–12 Weight: (men’s 11) 7.4 oz. spike, 6.8 oz. spikeless;

(women’s 8) 6.5 oz. spike, 5.9 oz. spikeless Fit: snug heel, close forefoot

New Balance 507The 507 picks up right where the 506 left

off. The midsole and outersole arecarried over. The same solid

rubber, luggedoutersole provides

durable tractionwith a TPU plate for

protection and springyresponsiveness and molded EVA

for a measure of cushion on harder surfaces. The familiar story ofchanges to the upper here results in a more supportive midfoot

saddle. (It was previously just a couple straps from the eyestay tothe heel counter.) Now the heel is locked down more securely andthe forefoot is better supported with a full rand that also helps keepthe elements out. The barefoot interior feel has even been improveda little, as the closed mesh breathes well and synthetic suede on the

tongue and low-cut ankle collar has a soft, non-irritating feel. Andthe availability of men’s widths broadens its reach (no pun

intended). The effect is a well-executed cross country performer.

SPIKE $60/SPIKELESS $50 Sizes: men 4–13,14,15 (D,2E widths); women 5.5–10,11 Weight: (men’s 11) 7.5 oz. spike,

6.8 oz. spikeless; (women’s 8) 6.7 oz. spike, 6.0 oz. spikeless Fit: snug heel, close forefoot

Saucony Shay XC 2Round two of the Shay XC features

improved tailoring and a neat way tocustomize the shoe.

The fit hasbeen tailored

to wrap thefoot more

snugly, especiallythrough the arch. The upper

has a sturdy rip-stop fabric on the sides of thevamp with an open stretch mesh on the tongue

down to the toes while wrapping the forefootinside the shoe. Overlays anchor the eyestay under

the midfoot/heel. In a nice touch, various colors of vinyl film canbe inserted into the overlays to customize the shoe with your

team colors. The proven midsole and outersole carry over fromround one, providing good cushioning and outstanding traction.The combination of fit, cushioning, and traction earned the Shay

XC 2 our award for Best Cross Country shoe.

SPIKE $75/SPIKELESS $70 Sizes: men 7–13,14; women 5–11,12 Weight: (men’s 11) 8.0 oz. spike, 7.1 oz. spikeless;

(women’s 8) 7.0 oz. spike, 6.2 oz. spikeless Fit: snug throughout

Puma Complete Haraka XCSHaraka is a Swahili word best

translated as “hurry,” whichaptly describes the

new CompleteHaraka XCS that’s

built on the strengthof Puma’s recent track

and cross country successes.The outersole is an aggressively lugged,

six-spiked configuration designed to maximize traction. The midsoleis a healthy slab of molded EVA that seems at home on the hard

surfaces without being too spongy off-road. The upper is a closedmesh with good breathability and a combination of welded

overlays and soft synthetic suede. The interior is cozy enough forbare feet, with a velour-lined tongue and innersole offering a plush

feel. The performance says hurry, but the attention to detail didn’tcut any corners.

SPIKE/SPIKELESS $65 Sizes: men 7–12,13,14; women 5.5–12 Weight: (men’s 11) 7.6 oz. spike, 6.7 oz. spikeless;

(women’s 8) 6.6. oz. spike, 6.0 oz. spikeless Fit: snug heel, close forefoott

FALL 2010

BEST SHOECross Country



TTeenage runners are at high risk for heat injurybecause they tolerate heat less efficiently than

adults. Compared with adults they have fewer sweatglands per square centimeter of skin surface areaand a lower sweating rate.

This doesn’t mean that teenage runners don’tsweat; in fact, they can lose prodigious amounts ofsweat. On a hot, humid day an average-sized teen(110–165 lbs.) can lose 1.6 to 2 liters of fluid, or2.5% to 3.5% of body weight.

In addition, when young runners train, theirbodies produce more heat than adults because theyhave a larger relative surface area than adults. Thecombined physiological effect of these in teenagersis excessive core heat gain in high temperatureswhen they get dehydrated, decreased ability totransfer heat from the muscles to the skin forcooling, shorter exercise tolerance time and alonger time to acclimatize to heat and humidity.

Over one hundred research papers show thatthe more sweat lost during a race, the moredrastically our running performance declines.Therefore, the key to maximizing teenage distancerunning performance and avoiding heat injury is byproper hydration.

What Should Teenagers Be Drinking?Hundreds of studies have found that carbohydrateand sodium in sports drinks have performance-enhancing effects. Carbohydrate solutions between6% and 8% (or 30–60 grams of CHO per hour) havebeen shown to improve distance performance byreplacing depleted muscle glycogen stores. Sodiumhelps retain water, stimulate thirst and prevent low-plasma sodium. However, the problem with somecommercially available sports drinks is that they aretoo salty or too sugary for some people, causing adelay in gastric emptying and absorption, so theydon’t get to where they are needed quickly enough. Avoid the imposters that are loaded with sugar—they’re no better for you than soft drinks. Ifelectrolyte drinks make you feel nauseated or causegastric distress, they’re too concentrated; dilutethem by 50% to 100% to a concentration that works

for you. This is often all that is needed to make ittolerable to your system. Some research indicatesthat the fluid should be cooled for maximalabsorption.

Post Race and Post Training RehydrationMany studies show that carbohydrates consumedimmediately after and two hours after exerciseenhance muscle glycogen restoration. This is mosteffective if ingested from fluid, as fluid is absorbedfaster. Many studies also show that electrolytebalance is restored almost to pre-exercise levelswhen an electrolyte beverage is drunk immediatelyafter exercise.

Hydration Tips for Surviving High Heat andHumidity and Maintaining PerformanceIntensityTraining Advice

• Drink lots of cold water before, during andafter your training efforts. Select runningroutes that have water fountains along theway. Drink 200–500 mls 15–20 minutes beforestarting and drink at least one cup of waterevery 20 minutes during long distancetraining. Carry a water bottle.

• There is nothing macho or intelligent aboutthe archaic practice of shunning water on yourtraining efforts thinking it will toughen youup—it could kill you.

• Post training or post race rehydration: Weighyourself before and after your race or trainingeffort. Make sure you drink that weight backon within an hour or two of finishing. Choosecarbohydrate-rich fluids such as juices thatreplace both water losses and muscleglycogen. Juices contain more carbohydratesthan sports drinks, so drink your fill of yourfavorite fruit juices.

• You’ll be able to tell whether you are hydratingadequately by the color of your urine. Darkyellow indicates low hydration, and pale tolight yellow is good.

Hydration and RunningPerformance for YourTeenage RunnerBy Roy Stevenson


HHigh school coaches walk a fine line whenworking with teenage athletes. They have to

know how and when to discipline athletes whosebehavior is unacceptable or who are not fullycommitted to the team. The exact rules of whatcoaches can say and what they should avoid sayingare unclear, but the repercussions can bedevastating when things go wrong. The wrongchoice of words by a coach can lead to his or herdismissal or a court case.

Track and cross country teams attract their fairshare of whiners, needy kids and drama kings andqueens, and working with them and turning themaround can be challenging, to say the least. And justwhen you have your team where you want it, thenext year you get a different mix and dynamic, andyou have to adjust your coaching andcommunications style again.

But you do have some things going for you, ascoach and teacher. First, most high school coachesare teachers who know the athletes and theirdispositions from classroom experience. And if youdon’t know the student, you can always track downa teacher who does know the student for advice.

Second, if you’ve been coaching (and teaching)for several years, and have established a goodreputation and formal code, the athletes will knowabout it before the first day of practice, which makesyour life much easier. Insist that being on your teamis a privilege, and not a right.

Here are some refresher tips for you to usewhen communicating with your athletes. At the first session in the cross country or trackseasons, review your expectations of your team.This should include your behavior expectations,team code and disciplinary measures you may takefor infractions. Emphasize that the athletes are partof a team, and get away from the “me first” attitude.

The old adage, “Praise in public, criticize inprivate,” is well worth following when working withyour athletes. However, there are exceptions to this,especially at the beginning of the season when youwant to show that you enforce your rules of conduct.

You should not have to put up with misbehavingathletes. For example, if some of your athletes aretalking when you’re addressing the team, it’s OK tocall them out publicly, but do it nicely, leaving themsome shred of dignity. Make sure you look at themdirectly, so they know you’ve got their number. Oneimportant thing to remember when disciplining anathlete privately—always have another coachpresent.

Always nurture leadership in all forms bydeveloping good team leaders, and not just fromthe senior students. Insist that they lead by exampleand demonstrate good values. This will save youmuch time as the season progresses. Often theteam leaders will take care of minor infractions byother team members by talking with them quietlyafter practice. And don’t be disappointed when theyfall short occasionally—they’re just teenagers andstill trying to figure things out for themselves.

The male coaches’ communications withfemale teen athletes can be especiallyproblematic—one thoughtless word from the coachor misinterpretation by the girl, and she’straumatized or runs to her parents or the principal.

One of the worst taboos is making commentsabout a girl’s weight—do not do this. If a girl isgenuinely overweight, pass this problem on to aprofessional sports nutritionist.

And never, ever, make any comments that yourmale or female athletes can construe as sexualinnuendo. What about the boy or girl who likes totell others on the team about their sexualescapades? Make it very clear to the athlete thattheir personal life does not come with them onto thetrack team. Tell them point blank, “I don’t want tohear about your personal affairs. This is not going tohappen here.”

Ultimately, communicating with teen athletesboils down to one thing. If you ask this questionafter you’ve dealt with a troublesome teen athlete:“Would I like my daughter or son to be treated as Ihave just treated that kid?” If you can answer “yes,”then you’ve probably said the right thing.


How High School CoachesShould Communicate withTheir AthletesBy Roy Stevenson



The warm-up addresses a number ofphysiological and psychological needs for the

high school athlete to prepare for training sessionsand competition. Warming up increases blood flowand oxygen to the working muscles, and boosts theoxygen concentration in hemoglobin. It dilates thealveoli to our lungs, increases our heart rate,enables us to tolerate more lactate production, andenhances our free fatty acids’ fuel burningefficiency. For field event athletes, warming upspeeds up the contraction speed and force of ourmuscles, giving them more power and making theirmovements more efficient. It meshes theirneuromuscular, skeletal, cardiovascular andrespiratory systems in that phenomenon we call“second wind.” And, just asimportant, warming uphelps nervous youngathletes to stabilize thatadrenalin rush beforecompetition, helping themcontrol pre-event ner-vousness.

A compilation of theresearch to date indicatesthat different types of warm-up are needed for differentevents, something thattrack and field coaches arewell advised to consider. Aone-size-fits-all warm-up isnot effective for all highschool athletes on a track team, although there arecertain common segments that all high schoolathletes should do in their warm-up.

All athletes should start with 5–10 minutes ofjogging to increase body temperature, followed by10 minutes of dynamic stretching exercises toreduce muscle stiffness. Dynamic (ballistic)stretches work best because they are closer to theathlete’s actual movements in competition, andresearch shows that static stretching exercises donot simulate rapid running movement and mayactually cause a reduction in leg power.

This section should be followed by 10–15minutes of general and event-specific drills toprepare the athlete for his or her event. Here aresome examples:

For high-power output events lasting a fewseconds like the 100, 200 and 400 meter sprints,five minutes of practice starts should be followed byseveral short sprints (50 meters) that graduallyincrease in speed to about 7⁄8ths of top speed, witha long recovery between each. However, this warm-up needs to be controlled so that it does not depletethe sprinter’s high-energy phosphates ATP and PC.

For distance events lasting up to 10 minutes(800, 1600, 2-mile), warm-up improvesperformance, but not if the intensity is too low

(<40% of VO2 max) or if therecovery time before thestart is too long (5–10minutes). The goal ofwarming up for middle-distance events is to get tothe start line with anelevated VO2, whilesufficiently recovered fromthe warm-up.

A prolonged warm-up fordistance runners (mile and2-mile) runs the risk ofoverheating and dehydratingthe athlete, and depletinghis or her muscle glycogenstores. Distance runners

should include leg drills or technique drills such asthree to six easy runs over 50 meters (but no longerthan this), while focusing on correct runningtechnique (staying relaxed and turning their legsover quickly and efficiently).

Field eventers should follow the same basicwarm-up, including sprints, then progress throughevent-specific drills.

Following these simple guidelines will ensureyour teenage athletes are adequately prepared fortheir event, and a reduced incidence of injuryshould follow.

How High School Track and Field Athletes ShouldWarm UpBy Roy Stevenson

A one-size-fits-all warm-up is

not effective for all high

school athletes on a track

team, although there are

certain common segments

that all high school athletes

should do in their warm-up.


Doing more with less. Changing with the times.

Putting 10 pounds of material into a 5-pound

bag. Being proactive. Multi-tasking. They’re all

terms that are tossed around frequently—but

somehow they all came into play at once during the

reconstruction of a college’s fieldhouse.

The facility, Mount Union College’s Peterson

Field House, had become outdated. Administrators

wanted to enlarge it and replace the building’s 20-

year-old, 160-meter track with a new 200-meter

facility. This called for a number of overhauls,

according to Kiefer Specialty Flooring, Inc. of

Lindenhurst, Illinois, who sent Brion Rittenberry to

look at the project.

The building, a steel-frame structure with

cinder-block walls, presented some unique

challenges, noted Rittenberry. Varying levels on the

flooring were just one obstacle.

“The enlargement posed significant issues as it

related to new and existing surface heights,” noted

Rittenberry. “Once we tore back the existing floor,

we realized the concrete was at a higher level near

the old wall placement, and the joint between the

old and new buildings was very uneven.”

Once a decision was made to pour the new

concrete substrate ½" below the old floor height,

thereby providing a level surface across the span of

all concrete being used, preparations began in

earnest. “Grinding was necessary to even out the

two surfaces,” noted Rittenberry. “Moisture test

results gave high readings on the new concrete;

therefore, a moisture sealer was needed to protect

the new floor. The concrete was shot-blasted, and

then the sealer was applied, taking special care at

the joint to protect it from moisture.”

Work on the facility included taking the time to

ensure that moisture infiltration wouldn’t become a

chronic problem that could cause problems down

the road, and that there would be lasting integrity of

the joint between the old and new floors.

“We used a flexible, self-leveling product to

even the joint and provide for possible movement,”

notes Rittenberry. “We installed a ½" rubber

underlayment with a special shore hardness to

bring the height of the new subfloor in line with the

old floor. We then abraded the old surface to

promote an enhanced mechanical bond and

overlaid the entire surface with a new pre-fabricated

sheet rubber surface.”

With flooring in place, it was time to turn to the

athletic amenities of the building. The new 200-


Indoor Track of the Yearby Mary Helen Sprecher

Photo by: Jiro Mochizuki, PhotoRun.NET

2010 Indoor Track of the Year, American Sports Builders AssociationMount Union College-Peterson Field HouseAlliance, Ohio

The newly renovated Mount Union College–PetersonField House in Alliance, Ohio is exceptional in a number of ways, but the one visitors never guess isthe fact that it presented multiple challenges todesigners, builders and suppliers involved in theproject. Photo courtesy of Keifer Specialty Flooring,Inc., Lindenhurst, IllinoisSpecialty Contractor: Keifer Specialty Flooring, Inc.Suppliers: Mondo USA (rubber sports surface)Architect/Engineer: Hastings and ChivettaConstruction Manager: Hammond Construction



meter track has six lanes with a nine-lane sprint and

the entire surface slopes in one true plane with a

tolerance of ⅛" in 10 feet. The surface is a pre-

manufactured blend of virgin rubber, vulcanized with

the base. The colors are dark grey and cognac.

In addition to its excellent track facility (and its

accompanying field events including long jump and

triple jump, located on the southwest and southeast

sides of the building) the facility can host a multitude

of sports, including practices for many of the athletic

programs of the college, according to the college’s

website. (A virtual tour of the facility includes

mention of the space for four indoor tennis courts, a

part of the NCAA program).

The project was completed on December 31,

2009. The end result has been a facility that not only

is a showcase for student athletes, but a showpiece

for the school system. And it didn’t escape the notice

of the American Sports Builders Association (ASBA),

the national organization for builders and suppliers

of materials for athletic facilities, which recognized

the facility in its annual awards of excellence, naming

it the Indoor Track Facility of the Year.

Awards are presented each year to facilities built

by ASBA members that best exemplify construction

excellence. Projects are scored individually and

anonymously by a committee of ASBA members,

based on considerations such as layout and design,

site work, drainage, base construction, surface,

amenities, innovation and overall impression.

Winning entries are those whose cumulative scores

meet or exceed the standard.

While administration and students are proud of

their enhanced and updated facility, Rittenberry is

happy with a project well done.

“Despite significant design obstacles and time

constraints, we were able to provide Mount Union

College with a completely flush world class track

surface on time and within budget,” he notes with

satisfaction.

Note: The American Sports Builders Association (ASBA)is a non-profit association helping designers, builders,owners, operators and users understand qualityconstruction of many sports facilities, including trackand field. The ASBA sponsors informative meetings andpublishes newsletters, books and technical constructionguidelines for athletic facilities including tracks, tenniscourts, athletic fields and multi-purpose indoor sportsbuildings. Available at no charge is a listing of allpublications offered by the Association, as well as theASBA’s Membership Directory. Info: 866-501-ASBA(2722) or www.sportsbuilders.org

The dark grey indoor track that is the center-piece of the Mount Union College–Peterson

Field House encircles a multi-purpose spacethat can allow athletes to train for any

number of sports offered by the college. Photo courtesy of Keifer Specialty Flooring, Inc., Lindenhurst, Illinois



There are tight deadlines and then there are thedeadlines that are so tight the finished project

practically squeaks. And when it came time to dothe Ponderosa High School’s outdoor running trackfacility, school officials and sports facilitycontractors had one of the latter.

The challenge? Well, perhaps it’s best to envision itas a memo:

TO: Beals Alliance and all participantsFR: Ponderosa High School

Please help us replace the high school’sexisting decomposed granite track and itsaccompanying natural turf field. Replace it witha new all-weather track and a synthetic turffield with inlaid striping for football and soccer,as well as field event facilities. Oh, and we starton April 1. Can you have it ready in time to hostcommencement on May 29?

“The project was the first portion of a recentlypassed bond and was critical to the success of theoverall bond campaign,” said Chris Sullivan fromFolsom, California-based Beals. “The project beganduring track season and had to be completed to alevel that would allow commencement ceremoniesto be held on the field. “

It was, by all accounts, a rush job for the agesand work had to start immediately. And even thatpart wasn’t without its challenges, added Sullivan.

“The existing facility had five feet of gradechange south to the north end, with the adjacentbleachers, concession and restroom structures toremain. The track was built to meet the existing gradeat midfield with retaining walls at each end for abalanced earthwork site. Tolerance, drainage andaccessibility issues dictated that the field would needto balance earthwork on site and remain accessiblefrom all the adjacent amenities to remain.”

Construction began in earnest and proceededon an incredibly expedited schedule. “The projectprogressed to a point that base work was completedto accommodate graduation in order to maintainthe overall schedule.”

According to Sullivan, the project stayed onschedule because of constant communicationincluding weekly construction meetings, submittalprocessing, ASIs, RFIs, punch lists and projectcloseout. “The lease/lease-back delivery methodwas utilized to insure integration with the selectedcontractors and the design team from start to finish.Each element of the design was reviewed fromconcept to construction to insure the end productwas feasible from a budget, schedule andconstruction standpoint.”

Outdoor Track of the Yearby Mary Helen Sprecher

2010 Outdoor Track of the Year, American Sports Builders AssociationRunning Track Facility at Ponderosa High SchoolShingle Springs, California

Looking down at the running track facility at Ponderosa High School in Shingle Springs, California,it's easy to see only a great project—and impossibleto guess that it was completed in record time.

Photo courtesy of Beals Alliance, Folsom, CaliforniaArchitect/Engineer: Beals AllianceSuppliers: ACO Sport (slot drain)Sportsfield Specialties (goal post and soccer goal system, take-off boards, pole vault box, sand catchers and shotput toe board)Mondo, USA (track surface)Robert Cohen Co. LLC (Mondo track surface installer)FieldTurf (artificial turf)



Final completion of the project came in Augustof 2009, making the facility ready for the opening ofthe 2009-2010 academic year and the Bruinsathletic seasons. The finished facility is adjacent tothe school’s tennis courts and baseball diamond.

The facility is aesthetically pleasing and incompliance with the standards of both the NationalFederation for State High School Association (NFHS,the governing body for high school sports), and theCalifornia Interscholastic Federation (CIF, thegoverning body for high school sports in the state).The eight-lane track is surfaced with a pre-manufactured vulcanized rubber system. It slopesinward to a slot drain that ties into the existing stormdrain system. The synthetic turf field, which hasfootball and soccer markings, utilizes perforateddrain pipes and has a composite base layer.

The end result has been a facility that not only isa showcase for student athletes, but a showpiece forthe school system. And it didn’t escape the notice ofthe American Sports Builders Association (ASBA),the national organization for builders and suppliersof materials for athletic facilities, which recognizedthe facility in its annual awards of excellence,naming it the Outdoor Track Facility of the Year.

Awards are presented each year to facilitiesbuilt by ASBA members, which best exemplifyconstruction excellence. Projects are scoredindividually and anonymously by a committee ofASBA members, based on considerations such aslayout and design, site work, drainage, baseconstruction, surface, amenities, innovation andoverall impression. Winning entries are those whosecumulative scores meet or exceed the standard.

And while the Bruins of Ponderosa High Schoolcan take a lot of pride in the fact that their facilityimpresses track and field designers, builders andsuppliers nationwide, they probably care aboutsomething more down-to-earth: impressing theiropponents when they run along the grey and greentrack, or out onto their new field of dreams.

Note: The American Sports Builders Association (ASBA)is a non-profit association helping designers, builders,owners, operators and users understand qualityconstruction of many sports facilities, including trackand field. The ASBA sponsors informative meetings andpublishes newsletters, books and technicalconstruction guidelines for athletic facilities includingtracks, tennis courts, athletic fields and multi-purposeindoor sports buildings. Available at no charge is alisting of all publications offered by the Association, aswell as the ASBA’s Membership Directory. Info: 866-501-ASBA (2722) or www.sportsbuilders.org

Photo by: Victah, PhotoRun.NET

The running track facility at Ponderosa High School meets the standards of both the National

Federation for State High School Association (NFHS,the governing body for high school sports), and theCalifornia Interscholastic Federation (CIF, the gov-

erning body for high school sports in the state).

Photo courtesy of Beals Alliance, Folsom, California.

The running track facility at Ponderosa High Schoolhas an eight-lane track surfaced with vulcanized

rubber, and a synthetic turf field that utilizes perfo-rated drain pipes and has a composite base layer.

Photo courtesy of Beals Alliance, Folsom, California.


SHOE REVIEWS:

Performance�21 • Neutral�22 • Motion Stabilizing�23

Each season, the overall direction of the footwear industry is revealed in trends. For more than four years,we’ve reported that companies have been lightening up many of their shoes and this continues. The growing

influence of minimalism and “barefoot” running, in conjunction with improved technologies and formulationsof components and refined design, has resulted in more shoes with less structure, lighter weight, and fewermotion-controlling features. Our racing shoe reviews have always looked at shoes that feature the least amountof support, weight, or inhibiting features, but this trend extends deeper than ever into the training shoe category.A number of high-mileage shoes have also benefitted from this trend, slimming down without compromisingtheir protective cushioning. And there is a shrinking but significant offering of heavier models that cater torunners who need extra cushioning or even more significant structure to counteract overpronation.

Geometry is another significant trend in the design of running shoes. Attention is being focused on more criticalmidsole shaping, the flare (depth and shape) of flex grooves, the size and positioning of crashpads, and theratio between heel and forefoot heights. Along with these considerations, designers and development teams arecarefully considering the material of each of these elements, appraising their rebound and dampening effects,in addition to their durability and comfort. The results of this focus on geometry can be seen in two types ofofferings: highly engineered models and spare, simplified designs.

These two trends are refining the way that running shoes perform when you take them out on a run, making iteasier than ever to find a shoe perfectly suited to your biomechanical and situational needs.

—Cregg Weinmann, Running Network Footwear Reviewer


Coaching Winter 11.e$S:Coaching Spring 09 1/3/11 1:13 AM

In the spring of 1991, it was my great good fortune to meet Emil Zatopek, winner of three Goldsat the 1952 Olympics (5000m, 10,000m, marathon) and two medals in 1948 (Gold in the10,000m and Silver in the 5000m). I was in awe.

After Emil served as our honorary assistant coach at the Ed Adams Invitational in Salinas, mycoaching partner Joe Mangan and I drove him to Carmel, California so he could see the beautyof Big Sur. During the drive, there was a twinkle in his eyes as he told us about his friendlyrivalry with Alain Mimoun, who finished second to him in numerous European and Olympicchampionships. It wasn’t until 1956, when Emil had injured himself training for the marathon,that Mimoun was victorious over Emil, and then he waited at the finish line as Zatopek finishedan honorable sixth place.

When I asked Emil how he got started running, he told me that he had needed a new pair ofboots and that was the prize for winning a local 5K race. So in the cold winter of 1944, Zatopekran his first race, won, and was given a new pair of boots—a necessary item in the cold, snowywinter in occupied Czechoslovakia.

The right footwear is a necessary item for all runners, no matter what their level. At theRunning Network LLC, we’re committed to making that search easier for you with this 2010Fall Shoe Review. You don’t have to win a race to get a great shoe—you simply need to visityour local running specialty store and try on a variety of shoes until you find the perfect onefor you. Best wishes!

Larry EderPresident, Running Network LLC

Running Network 2010 Fall Shoe Review

American Track & Fieldwww.american-trackandfield.com

Athletes Onlywww.atf-athlete.com

Athletics (Canada)www.otfa.ca

Austin Fitwww.austinfitmagazine.com

California Track & Running Newswww.caltrack.com

Club Runningwww.rrca.org/clubrunning

Coaching Athletics Quarterly www.coachingathleticsq.com

Colorado Runnerwww.coloradorunnermag.com

Get Active!www.healthclubs.com

Greater Long Island Running Club’s Footnoteswww.glirc.org

Latinos Corriendowww.latinoscorriendo.com

MarathonGuide.comwww.marathonguide.com

Michigan Runnerwww.michiganrunner.net

Missouri Runner & Triathletewww.morunandtri.com

Running Journal & Racing Southwww.running.net

RunMinnesotawww.runmdra.org

RunOhiowww.runohio.com

Track & Field Newswww.trackandfieldnews.com

USATF’s Fast Forwardwww.usatf.org

USATF–New England’s Exchange Zonewww.usatfne.org

The Winged Footwww.nyac.org

The Winged Mwww.themac.com

Youth Runnerwww.youthrunner.com

Reviewer: Cregg Weinmann ProjectCoordinator/Editor: Christine JohnsonDesigner: Kristen Cerer Proofreader: MargSumner, Red Ink Editorial Services ShoePhotography: Daniel Saldaña, CreggWeinmann Advertising Sales: RunningNetwork LLC, Larry Eder, President,608.239.3785, [email protected]: Larry Eder, 608.239.3785 Website: www.runningnetwork.com For a Media Kit, please visit our website.

This 2010 Fall Shoe Review is producedindependently by Running Network LLC for its partnerpublications. All shoes reviewed were tested byexperienced, competitive runners who were matchedto the biomechanical purpose of each shoe model.

Copyright © 2010 by Running Network LLC. AllRights Reserved. No part of this publication may bestored, copied, or reprinted without prior writtenpermission of Running Network LLC.

Running Network LLC and its partner publicationssuggest that, as with all fitness activities, you meetwith a healthcare professional before beginning orchanging your fitness regimen.

ASICS Gel-Nimbus 12

Best Shoe�Neutral

Saucony ProGrid Kinvara

Best Shoe�Performance

Nike LunarGlide+ 2

Best Shoe�Motion Stabilizing

K-Swiss Blade-Light

Best New Shoe

Mizuno Wave Precision 11

Best Renovation

Brooks Summon 2

Best Value

AWARD WINNERS

BEST SHOENeutral

FA L L 2 0 10

BEST SHOE

Fall 2 0 1 0

Performance

BEST SHOEMotion

StabilizingFA L L 2 0 1 0

BEST RENOVATIONFALL 2010

BEST VALUEFALL 2010

BEST NEW SHOEFALL 2010

WELCOME TO THE RUNNING NETWORK’S

2010 FALL SHOE REVIEW

RUNNING NETWORK

LLC PARTNERS




adidas adiZero Boston $100

To runners, “Boston” means the Boston Marathon; the adiZero Boston also takes its name from that race. Taking a page fromthe minimalist’s design book, it nestles into the adiZero line, the pure performance range of adidas running. The upper is a thin,open mesh with an internal framework of soft, synthetic suede supports and external overlays at heel and toe. A thin layer offoam at the ankle collar and in the tongue only where the laces tie provides just enough padding to secure the shoe comfortablywithout adding unnecessary weight. The midsole is a resilient chunk of EVA with a surprisingly low-profile feel. The heel is acombination of the effective ForMotion cassette and a substantial crashpad to manage the touchdown. It’s mated to a forefootof flexible adiPrene+. The result is an effective performance shoe that withstands the demands of high-mileage training.

“Well cushioned, even for daily training. Not bad in the weight department; light enough for faster running. I’ve been very pleased with theperformance.”

Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics to very mild overpronation • Sizes: Men 6.5–13,14,15; Women5–12 • Weight: Men 11.5 oz. (size 11); Women 9.7 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, adiPrene Strobelboard (heel)

Brooks Summon 2 $85

The original Summon was a yeoman-like neutral shoe that generated a rather neutral response. The Summon 2 looks to changethat with some upgrades and a price reduction. The upper uses a more open mesh—an improvement, to be sure—though it’sjust a bit spare on the ankle collar foam. The fit is secure and overlays are well-placed; in fact, the medial side is shored up,especially at the first metatarsal head, though the tradeoff is that it’s not very bunion-friendly. The midsole is the new BioS-257,Brooks’ reliable foam made eco-friendly without compromising performance. In fact, it’s more responsive than the originalformulation. The contouring of the foam gives the shoe a much-improved transition through the footstrike and a lower profileappearance. Runners looking for a lightweight, neutral, high-mileage shoe may be well-served by the Summon, honored as ourBest Value.

“Fit well with good support. Very good cushioning, nice responsive toe-off. Pretty light for a high mileage trainer, though a bit heavy for aperformance shoe. A good running shoe, plain and simple.”

Updates the Summon • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15; Women 6–12• Weight: Men 11.6 oz. (size 11); Women 9.9 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, BioS-257 Strobel board

K-Swiss Blade-Light $100

The Blade-Light advances the concept behind the UltraNatural Run series, but with a little more heft. Surprisingly lightweight,its appearance may cause concern about handling heavy mileage, but its performance confirms that it can take just aboutwhatever you’re willing to throw at it. It’s very neutral—there’s no extra support in the shoe—and it provides plenty of cushionand great flexibility. The upper features a supportive saddle that keeps the foot centered over the midsole, which is a generousslab of molded EVA that has excellent flexibility. The outersole is minimal (largely exposed EVA) but with carbon rubber in thehigh-wear areas and a forefoot insert of blown rubber and Superfoam assisting the toe-off. What you get is much more thanyou see at first look—so much so, that the Blade-Light earned honors as our Best New Shoe.

“These worked great for me, no matter what kind of running, but especially fast running.”

Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 7–13,14; Women 5–11,12 • Weight: Men 10.5 oz.(size 11); Women 8.9 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, Superfoam Strobel board

Mizuno Wave Precision 11 $97

The Precision has had a faithful audience through 10 updates and the Precision 11 may be the best yet. The upper is lightweightand the open mesh breathes well. The newly designed eyestay connects to three separate internal straps to cinch the upperwhere it needs to conform to the foot. A soft, sueded liner wraps the ankle and instep and an Ortholite innersole adds cushioningand comfort. The midsole is AP+, providing a much-improved ride to the shoe that’s further enhanced by an articulated versionof the Wave Plate, a re-beveling of the heel, and an additional deflection zone in the midfoot to accommodate a variety offootstrikes and gaits. The outersole has more flex grooves to improve flexibility while maintaining durability in the high-wearareas thanks to the carbon rubber. The performance is perfect for fast running—tempo, speedwork, even some long races—yet durable enough for day-to-day use for the biomechanically efficient, earning it honors as our Best Renovation.

“They fit snug mid-foot and have ample toe room. They feel comfortable and have good cushioning for their light weight.”

Updates the Wave Precision 10 • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 7–13,14; Women6–11 • Weight: Men 11.0 oz. (size 11); Women 9.3 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted

New Balance 759 $95

The New Balance approach to updates has always been conservative. The overall changes to the 759 appear minor when lookedat individually, but in combination, they’re enough to nudge the shoe into the Performance range. The consistent execution, fit,and ride have been little altered, but each of these areas benefits from the industry-wide trend of trimming weight from a shoewherever it reasonably can. The upper is a wide open mesh outer layer with a fine mesh lining. The overlays have beenredesigned, cleverly anchoring the foot to the midsole in a few strategic places while freeing it in the forefoot, providing supportwhile saving weight. The midsole is still ACTEVA Lite with the same basic N-ERGY set-up in the heel, though minor alterationsto the components do improve the transition. The outersole is a bit more flexible and maintains the blown rubberforefoot/carbon rubber heel that has worked well in this series. Runners will find the 759 to be a consistent and protective high-mileage trainer, which happens to weigh less than one might expect.

“I liked the shoe and the neutral colors. I noticed that NB did not use the ‘crinkly’ laces that tend to stay tied so well. The upper materialsare very breathable to help keep my feet dry and cool. They wore well, but the cushioning was about average.”

Updates the 758 • Recommended for: low- to medium-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15 (D,2E,4E); Women6–12,13 (2A,B,D) • Weight: Men 11.7 oz. (size 11); Women 9.9 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted,polyurethane Strobel board

BEST VALUEFALL 2010

BEST RENOVATIONFALL 2010

BEST NEW SHOEFALL 2010

PERFORMANCE



PERFORMANCE/NEUTRAL


Nike Pegasus+ 27 $90

The Pegasus has been updated more than twice as many times as the next-longest model series in this review. That’s a lot ofwork poured into a shoe that continues to reflect the best in materials and know-how. The biggest story of #27 is its weight: It’salmost 5% lighter than last season. The light weight, however, doesn’t undermine its ability to handle the mileage demandedby serious runners. The upper features a routine airmesh with an effective saddle design that secures the midfoot and lines upthe foot over the midsole. The midsole features Cushlon for the first time (replacing the stalwart Phylon). Although there’s abump in price, it matches the bump in value. The outersole—waffle-fill in the forefoot and BRS 1000 in the heel—has excellentdurability with traction to match. The sum of these parts adds up to one of the best versions yet of the Pegasus.

“They seemed a little snug [on] the first few runs, but I think now I would say they are supportive. The shoes have a lightweight bounce tothem. Very impressed with these shoes—good durability, fit, and cushion.”

Updates the Pegasus+ 26 • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 6–13,14,15; Women5–12 • Weight: Men 11.8 oz. (size 11); Women 10.0 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board

Saucony ProGrid Kinvara $90

The Kinvara is the most innovative shoe Saucony has produced this year, and it may well influence its line for some time tocome. The philosophy of “less is more” is on full display here. The upper is a gossamer-like, fine mesh over an open meshliner; the combination is both protective and breathable. Instead of a full ankle collar, twin ovals of memory foam guard eachside of the Achilles tendon and provide both secure fit and comfort. The midsole is a new EVA compound with more rubber forincreased resilience. An insert of ProGrid Lite in the heel smoothes the touch-down and a tweak to the heel/forefoot ratios—lowering the heel a bit with a generous forefoot—actually improves the overall cushioning as well as provides a more naturalbiomechanical position. Its combination of innovations and its feather-like weight earned the Kinvara honors as our Best Shoein the Performance category.

“Nice, secure fit. No slipping in heel even though it has little structure. Light as a feather, surprising how well they work for daily training.Any reservations I may have had about how light they were have been dispelled by their performance on the road.”

Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 4–13,14,15,16,17; Women 5–12 • Weight: Men 7.7oz. (size 11); Women 6.7 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted

Zoot Ultra Kane $150

Its light weight places the Ultra Kane squarely in the Performance category, but make no mistake about it: This is a full-featuredmotion stabilizing shoe. The upper takes a cue from their racer, the Ultra Speed, using compression fabric for a skin-tight fitthat flexes just enough to give support while still allowing the foot to move. The midsole is a beefed-up layer of full-length Z-bound over a high-quality EVA. These dual-density inserts sit on top of each other separated by a carbon shank and work as aunit to stabilize overpronation. The outersole—carbon rubber in the high-wear areas with blown rubber in the lateral forefoot—is segmented and pared back to save weight, while providing traction, flexibility, and comfort. Overall, the Ultra Kane bringsstability, cushioning, and performance to runners and triathletes serious about their run.

“Very snug, comfortable, and supportive. Pretty doggone light, especially for the stability and support. Great shoe, I have to say. No realdrawbacks for me.”

Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics to very mild overpronation • Sizes: Men 6–14,15,16; Women6–11 • Weight: Men 10.7 oz. (size 11); Women 9.9 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board

ASICS Gel-Cumulus 12 $100

The Cumulus fills an important role in ASICS’ impressive line of neutral shoes and Round 12 provides the expected quality andcushioning. A larger heel Gel component increases resiliency, and minor changes to the midsole sculpting and outersoleadjustments add stability while refining the transition from heelstrike to toe-off. The ride is much the same as before, just moredialed in. The upper is a nice, open mesh and employs HF-welded supports in the open areas and the logo stripes extend backtoward the top of the heel. Other overlays have been reduced or eliminated in areas that are now better supported by the alternatemethods. The height of the ankle collar has been lowered to reduce possible irritation but the remaining memory foam conformswell. The interior has a plusher feel and forefoot cushioning has been upgraded by changing the 3⁄4-length Solyte Strobel boardto full-length. These modifications and additions result in a better shoe, which is welcome news to Cumulus fans.

“Very secure fit, with plenty of padding—maybe more than needed. These have been reliably well-cushioned since the beginning, and Iappreciate the ride they provide. They are a bit heavy, but that trade-off seems necessary for the cushioning.”

Updates the Gel-Cumulus 11 • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 6–13,14,15 (D),7–13,14,15 (2E,4E); Women 5–13 (2A,B), 6–13 (D) • Weight: Men 13.5 oz. (size 11); Women 11.1 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved •Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, Solyte Strobel board

ASICS Gel-Nimbus 12 $120

The flagship of ASICS’ neutral shoes isn’t what it used to be—it’s better. A men’s size 11 is 5% lighter than last year, the biggestweight loss (0.9 ounces!) among the slimmed-down mid-weight shoes in this review. The upper has retained the stretchy mesh,Biomorphic Fit panels, and asymmetrical lacing, but the individual eyelets have been separated into what ASICS calls DiscreteEyelet Construction to conform to the contours of the foot, improving the fit. The memory foam in the ankle collar has beenupgraded in quality and the collar height is lower to reduce the possibility of irritation. The midline flex grooves on theunderside of the midsole and as well as those in the outersole have been opened to allow the foot to follow a more natural pathin its gait—put simply, the shoe flexes better with the foot. The plush ride, weight savings, and outstanding fit earned theNimbus 12 our Best Shoe award in the Neutral category.

“I am new to running, but these shoes really give me the desire to run farther than before. I have never worn any shoes more comfortablethan these.”

Updates the Gel-Nimbus 11 • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 6–14,15,16 (D),7–14,15,16 (2E,4E); Women 5–13 (B), 6-13 (2A,D) • Weight: Men 12.6 oz. (size 11); Women 10.6 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved •Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, Solyte Strobel board

BEST SHOENeutral

FA L L 2 0 1 0

BEST SHOE

Fall 2 0 1 0

Performance




Mizuno Wave Alchemy 10 $110

The Alchemy continues to be Mizuno’s most consistent motion stabilizing shoe. The midsole now features the AP+ foamformulation, adding noticeable responsiveness. The forefoot area of the midsole unit has been slightly broadened for betterstability and the midsole sculpting allows better articulation with both the ground and the Wave plate. The medial forefoot flexgrooves in the outersole have been greatly reduced without inhibiting the transition from heel to toe and the outersole has beeneven more differentiated by gender: The women’s lateral forefoot is more flexible, while the men’s is a bit stiffer, accommodatingaverage weight differences. New overlays supporting the eyestay wrap the foot better, while the top lateral eyelet is hinged forbetter customization. The interior sports a new sueded material made even more comfortable by the memory foam ankle collar.The stability, cushioning, and comfort features make the Alchemy 10 Mizuno’s motion stabilizing MVP.

“It has a very nice balance of padding and ‘feel’ of the road. My foot feels well protected. After 100 miles, these shoes look and feel brandnew. I am pleased to notice that the dark gray collar (lining) around the ankle is a bit more durable than I have seen on most running shoes.”

Updates the Wave Alchemy 9 • Recommended for: low- to medium-arched feet with moderate overpronation • Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15,16 (D,2E);Women 6–12 (AA,B) • Weight: Men 13.9 oz. (size 11); Women 11.2 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted

New Balance 1226 $140

The 1226 is New Balance’s most performance-oriented motion stabilizing shoe and it updates the 1225 with some reshapingto improve support and secure the midfoot. Cushioning has been optimized by modifying the rubbery heel crashpad, and the1225’s three small rubbery inserts are now a single, dual-winged unit in the lateral midfoot that acts as a crashpad under thefifth metatarsal. Stability has been dialed in with adjustments to the Stability Web shank support, as well as a new iteration ofStabilicore that’s thicker where the forces are greatest and a bit thinner where they’re less. The outersole has been completelyreworked: Flex grooves have been repositioned and there’s a bit more blown rubber in the forefoot that’s die-cut to allow goodflexibility. The fit has also been refined with webbing loops running the length of the eyestay that we found to secure the foot abit better. The result is a stable, well-supported, well-cushioned shoe.

“Initial fit is comfortable and snug. It seems that these have a nicer and softer feel with some ‘squish.’ Remarkably, these don’t have thesame clunky feel that I’ve experienced in previous New Balance stability shoes. It’s a good, comfortable shoe.”

Updates the 1225 • Recommended for: low- to medium-arched feet with moderate to maximum overpronation • Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15,16(B,D,2E,4E); Women 6–12 (AA,B,D) • Weight: Men 13.8 oz. (size 11); Women 11.5 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobelslip-lasted, polyurethane Strobel board

Nike LunarGlide+ 2 $100

The Nike Lunar shoes have been a work in progress, leapfrogging innovation with minor modifications and adjustments. TheLunarGlide+ 2 takes the platform and philosophy of the original and refines the final product. The upper has been tailored for abetter fit and a new configuration of Flywire in the midfoot provides support that holds the foot securely so it doesn’t slide aroundinside the open forefoot, a weakness of the initial round. The midsole and ride will be familiar as the Lunarlon foam andcomponents have been retained in their original form. The outersole is essentially unchanged, providing a good combination oftraction and durability. The improvements to the upper, the continued great ride, and the welcome price freeze all contribute toearning the LunarGlide+ 2 honors as our Best Shoe in the Motion Stabilizing category.

“Love the way they fit—nice and smooth, and hug your foot and arch. Super light, springy feeling while I run, but they still have plenty ofcushion and support. The stability of the shoes is good. They cinch up around my foot nicely and hold it in place quite well.”

Updates the LunarGlide+ • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics to moderate overpronation • Sizes:Men 6–13,14,15; Women 5–12 • Weight: Men 12.2 oz. (size 11); Women 9.9 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board

Pearl Izumi IsoShift $120

The new IsoShift debuts Pearl Izumi’s new technology called the Graduated Guidance System. This is the most efficient midsolegeometry that Pearl Izumi has used in a motion stabilizing shoe to date. It keeps the weight down by using a cradle of seconddensity EVA foam to assist the foot through the gait cycle. The shoe affords plenty of stability with good cushioning that has abouncy response. The upper has the seam-free construction the brand is known for, along with HF-welded overlays adding atouch of support at the top and bottom edges of the eyestay, and sturdier synthetic overlays in the heel and toe. A new outersoleconfiguration of carbon rubber provides durability and traction. If Pearl Izumi has been a satisfying choice for your training, theIsoShift should be a quality performer for you.

“Fit well; it really secured my foot. Decent cushion, better after a few break-in miles. The stability was about as good as Pearl Izumi hasdone, and it feels a lot lighter.”

Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with very mild to moderate overpronation • Sizes: Men 7–13,14; Women 5–11,12 • Weight:Men 12.6 oz. (size 11); Women 10.4 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board

Puma Vectana 2 $100

For Puma, the Vectana ushered in a return to a traditional approach to motion stabilizing shoes and Version 2 irons out somebugs while refining its strengths. The fit has been adjusted, in part by tailoring, in part by the rake of the heel, and the shoenow fits true to size (the original ran about a half-size small). The upper—from the stretchy mesh to the memory foam anklecollar—is still very plush, while supportively securing the foot over the midsole. The cushioning is first-rate, thanks to acombination of components: mostly EVA and a blend of rubber, but the DuoCell unit in the heel contributes, as do the Ortholiteinnersole and ldCell Strobel board. The M2D (medial second density) extends farther from the arch toward the heel for betterstability. The outersole has increased decoupling in the heel to slow overpronation and more segmentation in the forefoot toprovide better flexibility for toe-off. The net effect is a plush, stable, high-mileage training shoe.

“Love them. My foot is healing and I upped my miles in these shoes—I liked the stability they provided. I put about 150 miles on theseand they still are wearing really well.”

Updates the Vectana • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with mild to moderate overpronation • Sizes: Men 7.5–13,14; Women5.5–12 • Weight: Men 14.0 oz. (size 11); Women 11.6 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, ld Cell Strobelboard

BEST SHOEMotion

StabilizingFA L L 2 0 1 0

MOTION STABILIZING


Coaching Winter 11:Coaching Spring 09 1/3/11 1:04 AM Page 24


Brooks Ghost 3 $100

The Ghost has evolved on its way to joining the hot-selling Adrenaline GTS as part of Brooks’ Go 2 Series. The upper is a wideopen mesh over a smaller mesh inner layer that moves moisture away and ventilates the foot. The pattern used for the upperhas changed a bit and those nips and tucks result in a better fit over the foot’s contours. The shoe has gained some weight, afair tradeoff for better cushioning and a plusher interior. The biggest improvement is the move to Brooks’ sprung last, which isused in the Glycerin and a few other styles. The profile of the forefoot sweeps up, providing a better transition and moreenergetic toe-off. The midsole is BioMoGo with its durable responsive ride and great flexibility. The HPR outersole and blownrubber forefoot are familiar and provide the expected performance: good traction, durability, and a little cushioning for yourhigh mileage. Runners looking for responsive cushioning and durability in a mid-priced, neutral shoe should consider theGhost.

“These shoes fit great. I have found them to be the shoe I have been reaching for when heading out for tempo runs, or this morning’s 1200s.My feet are happy even after 15 miles in them.”

Updates the Ghost 2 • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15 (B,D,2E); Women 5–12(2A,B,D) • Weight: Men 12.4 oz. (size 11); Women 10.6 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, S-257 Strobel board

Reebok Premier Aztrec 2 $85

The Aztrec was an excellent entry-level, neutral trainer that’s now ready to play with the big boys, thanks to some excellentupdating by Reebok. It’ll cost you an additional five bucks, but it’s money well spent. The upper has upgraded foam, improvedtailoring, and a redesigned tongue, all improving fit and comfort. The injection-molded EVA midsole gets some help from theDMX Foam Strobel board, which is now full-length, and the ride is more responsive and quick instead of somewhat spongy asit was before. The flex grooves have been reworked and newly configured DMPRTEK provides its measure of cushion, as wellas durable traction. The heel has a slightly larger outersole pod to improve medial stability, while the lateral side works withthe crashpad to keep the foot from drifting inward. Here, design and execution were accomplished with value remaining frontand center in the designers’ vision.

“This shoe is light, stable, with the right amount of cushioning, [at] a decent price. What’s not to like?”

Updates the Premier Aztrec • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 6.5–13,14; Women5–12 • Weight: Men 12.7 oz. (size 11); Women 10.8 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, DMX FoamStrobel board

Reebok Premier Verona Supreme $95

The Verona has gone through three iterations, each punctuated by methodical improvement. Though not intended for overpronators, the geometry of the midsole is now more forgiving of the efficiency breakdown that can occur with fatigue.There’s a lateral Shear unit, TPU arches that give a bit on impact and direct the foot from the lateral side, while a convex-shapedmedial midsole prevents the foot from rolling inward. The segmented outersole, flex grooves, and lateral crashpad provideadditional guidance to the foot for improved biomechanical efficiency, while the DMPRTEK outersole offers durable traction anda bit of extra cushioning. In concert, these changes provide a responsive, cushioned ride. The upper employs a stretch meshthat’s a bit more open for coolness and moving moisture. The tongue has been reshaped and softer lining materials used. TheKinetic Fit Panels are now combined with a SmoothFit interior to improve step-in comfort, even with barefoot use. The midfootis supported by the saddle created from the Vector stripes. The result is a responsive, mid-weight, mid-priced success story.

“They felt good from the first time I put them on. There’s a lot of padding around the collar. The toe box has a good amount of wiggle roomfor the tootsies. I felt like I was running (dare I say?) barefoot inside my socks and shoes.”

Updates the Premier Verona KFS 2 • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 6.5–13,14;Women 5–11,12 • Weight: Men 12.4 oz. (size 11); Women 10.6 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, DMXFoam Strobel board

Saucony ProGrid Ride 3 $95

A bit bulkier than last year, the Ride now offers a plusher ride as the midsole features a larger lateral crashpad and forefootinsert. The midsole compound and ProGrid in the heel are durable and provide cushion without mushiness. The upper has asmaller percentage covered with overlays, favoring HF-welded supports in the interior of the forefoot, with fewer spots thatmight irritate. The fit is secure where necessary and there’s no slipping in the heel, thanks to memory foam in the collar. Amoisture-wicking lining prevents the problems associated with wetness. The outersole has newly configured flex grooves, andwhat appears to be a more substantial shank (though this is difficult to ascertain due to the nature and placement of the device)which helps keep the foot lined up through the footstrike. The durable carbon rubber heel and the blown rubber forefootcontribute their well-known strengths to the layers of cushioning, providing a plush ride to the Ride.

“Quite a bit of cushioning, evenly distributed. They felt a bit heavy but they’re protective, I’ll say that much for them. They did a good job.”

Updates the ProGrid Ride 2 • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics • Sizes: Men 6.5–13,14,15; Women5–12 • Weight: Men 13.1 oz. (size 11); Women 10.9 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, HRC Strobel board

Karhu Stable Fulcrum Ride $120

Though the name doesn’t indicate it, the Stable Ride is an update to last year’s model. What else is the same, you ask? Themidsole components—including Karhu’s Fulcrum, here in the stability version—and the outersole are essentially the same.There are always tweaks, especially in updated shoes, but they’ve left the cushy ride and good transition unaltered. The upperhas several improvements, primarily for better fit and comfort. The ankle collar and inside heel area have been smoothed outand combine with exterior heel overlays to offer better support. The logo stripes have been scaled down slightly, and thin,individual HF-welded straps now secure the midfoot to the eyestay to provide support while conforming to the foot. The openforefoot has been maintained, allowing the foot to spread comfortably. The weight is up slightly, but the stable, cushioned rideand secure fit may be just what you’re looking for.

“Fit well from toes to ankles. Good stability and cushiness, but the heel felt a little tippy and took some getting used to.”

Updates the Stable Ride • Recommended for: low- to medium-high–arched feet with mild to moderate overpronation • Sizes: Men 8–13,14;Women 6–11 • Weight: Men 13.8 oz. (size 11); Women 11.2 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted

NEUTRAL/MOTION STABILIZING


Coaching Winter 11.e$S:Coaching Spring 09 1/3/11 1:13 AM Page 23


There’s not a track coach in the country who hasn’tcome across overzealous parents at one time or

another. I’ve heard coaches refer to some parentsas TPs (terrorist parents), CPs (controlling parents)or HPs (helicopter parents who hover over everymoment of their teen’s life). This over-involvementand interference with athletes, and coaches who areonly trying to do their job, can be a major burden onthe unprepared coach.

Some of these over-involved parents are simplymisguided; thinking their son or daughter is thebest, when results indicate otherwise. Othersexpect their athlete offspring to win everything sothey can get a scholarship at University. Manyparents want their kids to win as an extension oftheir own ego or for braggingrights in their social circles orbecause they were goodathletes back in their day.

Whatever the reason for theparent’s expectations, theirbehavior is often shocking.You’ve seen it before: chewingout the coach, swearing at himor her, or even their child orathletes on other teams. Hereare some tips on how to dealwith overzealous parents. Following this advice willmake your life easier and take some of the stress offthe teenage athletes. Onerous as it may be, it is yourresponsibility to clarify your expectations withparents.

First, realize that 99% of all parents are saneand workable; they just need to be trained like theirathlete progeny. A common strategy is to activelyeducate them with verbal and written material.

State clearly, in writing, your coachingphilosophy and style, and school policies regardingathlete and parent conduct, including meet andpractice behavior and consequences of ignoringthis code. Emphasize that parents should showrespect for athletes competing against your school,and they should cheer their athletes in a positivemanner. Some coaches have parents sign an

agreement stating that they understand thecommitment their teen athlete is making, and thatthey agree to support him or her.

State that you promote strong ethics, soundprinciples and high ideals through track and fieldand cross country. This should include mentioningthat coaching is something you do and parentsdon’t, and parenting is what they should be doing,and that it is your job to run things the way you seefit.

Define a common mission for your team, andhow parents can help you and their children reachthese goals; for example, booster club, officiating atmeets, ensuring that the athlete is getting goodnutrition, etc. Tell the parents that you expect their

cooperation, support, andloyalty, and that you expectparents to be role models ofsportsmanship.

Establish your coachingcredentials and your expertise.When parents challenge you,be the expert in anondefensive way and beprofessional. This means youdo not respond to problemparents emotionally, and you

must always maintain self-control.Avoid crisis intervention mode with parents at

all costs. Waiting for problems and emotions toarise before you are forced to deal with them is adisaster in the making. This means you mustcommunicate with the parents. This means keepingthe lines of communication open with parents andbeing approachable. Encourage them to discussproblems with you, instead of taking them over yourhead. Listen to them, and let them know that youhear them, even when you don’t agree with them.Always do this respectfully.

Following these basic guidelines will avoidmost problems you are likely to encounter withoverzealous parents. Over time you will developadditional skills to work with parents to supportyour efforts.

Dealing with Over-Involved Parents: GettingParents to Work with You, not Against You,in High School Track and FieldBy Roy Stevenson

Onerous as it may be,

it is your responsibility to

clarify your expectations

with parents.



Whether we like it or not, injuries arean important part of track and field—

especially, it would seem, for the mosttalented middle- and long-distancerunners. In fact, of the 79 elite runners Iinterviewed for my new book, ComingBack Strong, only three reported thatthey had never suffered an injuryimportant enough to affect theirperformance.

Injuries happen because runners—and their coaches—tend to push therunners’ bodies to extremes, up to, andthen over the “fine line” that divideshealthy from hurt. Too many miles, toomuch intensity, too many repeats tooclose together—and something givesway. The intentions are noble, but theresults can be disastrous.

Who’s to blame? Nobody, unlessstriving for excellence is to be consideredbad. Runners try too hard because theywant to be better runners. Coaches go forone more repetition because they cansee that last repetition as the differencebetween a winner and an also-ran.

Alberto Salazar, who has seeninjuries close-up both as a championrunner and a coach of champion runners,argues that you have to get really close tothe fine line to excel.

“Remember,” he says, “you’rerunning against a lot of other people whoare flirting with that fine line, too.” Andalthough he acknowledges that some ofthose others will fall victim to injury, headds, “Not everyone’s going to beunlucky. Some will get very close to it andnot get injured and that’s who you’veultimately got to compete against.”

Salazar admits that some coachesfeel you should never let a runner get tooclose to that fine line. “But,” heresponds, “unless you’re so superior toeverybody else that you don’t need to gonear your limits to beat them, you do, outof necessity, have to go near that line.”

What do you do? Coaches andathletes all agree that the first thing to dowhen an athlete feels pain or discomfortwhile training is stop. Even if the pain ishardly noticeable, stop. To put it simply,“playing through the pain” is just plainstupid. For a runner, playing through thepain is an excellent way to turn a minorinjury into a major injury.

If the pain disappears, the athletecan start the exercise carefully and

gradually work up to the previousintensity. If the pain or discomfortreturns, that finishes the exercise, andthe next step is to see a trainer or adoctor. Says Salazar, “Even when it’s justa soreness that the runner feels, I believeyou have to immediately get on it.”

Once an injury is diagnosed, ofcourse, a plan of rest, of alternatetraining methods or, perhaps, arehabilitation program can be puttogether. Making the plan is not usuallyvery difficult, but making it work often is.

Coaches and athletes agree that thekey to recovering from an injury andgetting back into hard training is p-a-t-i-e-n-c-e. Whether or not the athlete hasalready been doing some kind of crosstraining, swimming, riding a bike,working on ellipticals, pool running, etc.,are excellent ways to maintain optimalfitness. And a specially designed rehabprogram is often required on the roadback to fulltime running training.

But none of these are running.Progress is often slow, and runners canget discouraged. Speaking of his days asa 13:49 5000 meter runner,Wisconsin–Parkside coach MicahVanDenend says, “There is eventually abreaking point, where you feel fed up andfeel you can no longer continue.”

This, I feel, is one of the realchallenges a coach faces. In the nextissue of AT&F, we’ll talk about the longroad to recovery, the problems of rehaband how rehabbing can help an athletecan come back—not just strong, butstronger than ever.

Don Kopriva’s new book, Coming Back Strong is

based on extensive interviews with many of

America’s top distance runners and coaches,

covering their experiences with injuries and how

they came back from those injuries even stronger

and faster than before. Since almost every runner

who races over 800 meters and up encounters

some kind of injury—and certainly everyone who

coaches runners deals with a constant parade of

injured athletes—Don’s book is indeed one that

everyone in the running business will want to own.

When issued Nov. 1, Coming Back Strong will have

a cover price of $29.95 (including shipping). There

is a discount for pre-publication orders, which will

be $24.95 (including shipping). To order, send a

check to RightOn Communications, PO Box 3830,

Lisle, IL 60532. For more information, please call

(630) 964-5496.

Runners’ Injuries and How to Handle ThemBy Don Kopriva


C A M E R A AT H L E T I C A :

S A LU T E S Q U E E N H A R R I S O N A N D A S H TO N E ATO N

Victah, www.photorun.NET

We want to congratulateAshton Eaton and QueenHarrison for winning theBowerman Award, whichrecognizes the bestcollegiate athletes of theyear.

27Coaching Athletics Quarterly - Spring 2010



If you’ve ever watched any “special” track event—from Special Olympics to the Wheelchair 800 at

the Olympic Games—you know that the joy ofcompetition and winning are just as exciting for theathletes as any “normal” competitor.

These days, we’re seeing an increasing numberof track and field events for handicapped athletes.High school athletic associations are reporting anincrease in requests for accommodations forstudents with mobility limitations. Assistantdirector Becky Oakes of the National Federation ofState High School Associations reports that severalstates—including Minnesota, Georgia, Alabama,Iowa and Washington—currently offer adaptive,wheelchair events within their state track and fieldchampionships.

And in other states, increasingly, local highschool and college tracks are being requested—ordrafted—to serve as venues for specialcompetitions.

Fortunately, adapting most facilities to meetthe needs of special athletes doesn’t have to meandrastic changes. Designers of athletic facilities,sports contractors and material suppliers have allworked with individual high schools and with stateassociations to help break down barriers and makeathletic programs available to all. Changes, largeand small, can be implemented now.

It might be things we as able-bodied folkswouldn’t even notice, like a gate that’s a bit toonarrow to get a wheelchair through. Changing a fewsimple things like that can turn a facility from beingmerely usable into an arena that allows the athleteto relax and use his or her skills.

According to industry insiders, it all starts withattempting to understand the needs of the kidsand—in a huge part—to understanding how muchthat need is growing. And while the Americans withDisabilities Act (ADA) certainly plays a part in thedesign of many facilities, its work can only do somuch to include athletes with physical challenges.

Some ExamplesSchools with wheelchair racing programs tend tooffer at least one throwing event—shot put, javelin,etc. The athletes are referred to as “seatedthrowers.” Wheelchairs are generally secured to theground or to an immobile object for the throwingevents. According to Gary Phillips, assistant executivedirector at the Georgia High School Association,

GHSA partnered with the American Association ofAdapted Sports Programs, which helped identifyand develop programs that would serve athleteswith disabilities. At present, says Phillips, athletesin wheelchairs compete in their own division inthree track and field events, the 200m, 800m andthe shot put.

“We thought some kids might be better suitedfor short races, and some for long races,” saidPhillips, “and we wanted the shot as a throwingevent. We divide the shot into two divisions basedon the student’s handicap.”

The state of Washington offers not only trackand field programs, but also cross country, forathletes in wheelchairs, according to Teresa Fisherof the Washington Interscholastic ActivitiesAssociation.

One state working to grow its programs isMaryland, according to Ned Sparks, executivedirector of the Maryland Public Secondary SchoolsAthletic Association.

“All our school systems are required to haveaccommodations for students with disabilities, andmany are going to have a track and fieldcomponent,” notes Sparks. “I would think that, yes,it is one of those things that is going to be there inthe future, and also that it’s going to be one of thosethings that is just offered automatically, rather thanhaving to have students ask for it.”

One of Maryland’s high school track and fieldathletes went on to medal at the Paralympics.Sparks notes that, although Maryland has been oneof the first states to allow athletes in wheelchairs toshare the track with their able-bodied counterparts,“I don’t think we’re going to be the last.”

The National Federation for State High SchoolAssociations’ 2008–09 High School AthleticsParticipation Survey shows that responding schoolsoffered adapted sports programs in basketball,bowling, floor hockey, soccer, softball and track.These are far from the only programs open,however. The U.S. Tennis Association promoteswheelchair tennis on a grassroots level, and manylocal parks and recreation departments offeradapted sports programs, including golf and bocce.Other schools have offered special programs inskiing, baseball and more. Swimming has long beena sport that has attracted individuals with mobilityimpairments. It’s all a matter of student interest andwillingness to adapt programs to their specificneeds.

Special Athletes, Special Eventsby Mary Helen Sprecher

Photo: Victah, www.photorun.NET



On the TrackPerhaps the first thing to address is making surethat athletes with special needs can get to a track.Gates used by athletes should have at least a 48"opening, which allows athletic wheelchairs (thosewhose wheels have a camber, or slant) to passthrough. The last thing an athlete wants to do is getout of his or her chair and have someone pass itover the gate while he or she “scoots” along theground through the opening.

While high-level professional athletes canafford to be choosy about the surfaces they use,high schoolers generally don’t have that option, andthat goes for athletes using wheelchairs, as well asthe runners. Sparks says Maryland hasn’tresearched the surface/wheelchair tire interaction(the sport is still in the developmental stages atmost high schools), but hazards a guess that“maybe the harder the surface, the better.”

According to Jim Stalford of Mondo USA (TegaCay, South Carolina), “Wheelchair track racers preferthe consistency of a vulcanized rubber surface. Thisallows them to have some traction on all areas ofthe surface and to minimize how far the wheelspenetrate the surface, enabling them to push fasterwith less energy.”

Other tips for those designing or setting upfacilities for athletes in wheelchairs? Adequatewarm-up areas. “These are hard to accommodate,”Stalford notes. “It is best if there is a large openparking lot, road or warm-up track near thecompetition track for athletes to warm up. Thewarm-up area also needs a safe and easy waypathway for the athletes to get to the competitionarea.”

Other ConsiderationsThen there are the aspects of competition that manypeople don’t even know about, according to MattHale of Halecon in Bridgewater, New Jersey. Havingthese, he notes, can mean all the differencebetween a facility that’s not just accessible butwelcoming.

“Something I believe is critical, yet oftenmissed, is adequate shade for temperaturecontrol,” Hale notes. “Many individuals with spinalcord or brain injuries are extremely sensitive totemperature, particularly to heat. Some can havelife-threatening heat reactions which can occur withlittle warning. Plan as much shade as possible. Iwould just stress that surface that throws off heat

should be avoided. The more shade, the better.”Plan for athletes’ needs both on and off the

track or playing field, he adds. Of course, havingwater sources at or near the facility is a must, but soare some other things. “If possible, a cool-downarea would be helpful, possibly an enclosed spaceattached to a bathroom facility, air-conditioned,with electric outlets and water. This space could notonly provide emergency cooling, but also a privatearea for suctioning. Many people with high spinalcord injuries have difficulty breathing, and often useventilators for assistance. At times, the airway canget blocked with secretions, thus creating an urgentneed for suction. Proper suction would require asource for water and electric.”

Other types of disabilities can also beaccommodated, Stalford adds, with the rightfacilities. “Visually impaired runners prefer a highcontrast track. A solid-colored red or black track withwhite lines is best. Blind long and triple jumpershave difficulty with raised runways. It’s best to havethe runway even with the surrounding ground andplenty of room at the end of the sand box (no lightpoles, gutters, etc.). The sand should be even withthe end of the box so that they can easily runthrough the back and not trip on the box or run intoanything when they do run-throughs.”

Legal IssuesADA legislation was an enormous help toindividuals with physical challenges, but it’s farfrom the end of the road. New laws are beingenacted all the time. One that has the potential toimpact all athletic programs in schools across thestate of Maryland, says Ned Sparks, and which willtake full effect in 2011, is the Fitness and AthleticEquity Law for Students with Disabilities. In short, itensures that students with disabilities are providedequal opportunities to participate in physicaleducation programs, and athletic activities inMaryland schools. The Maryland Dept. ofDisabilities and the Maryland State Dept. ofEducation will work with local school jurisdictions toimprove policies and implement the new statuteand improvements to adaptive physical educationand interscholastic athletic participation.

While Sparks understands the necessity ofaccommodating all athletes, and believes that allstudents should be able to participate in athletics ifthey can, he also recognizes the difficulties that lieahead for schools and athletic programs.


“This is a heck of a budget time, and to bemandating/adding sports at a time when a lot ofcuts are being made—that’s difficult. It’s difficult tolaunch new programs when you’re trying to fight tokeep the old ones.”

Other states, which are not mandating as manynew measures, find it easier to accommodatestudents with physical challenges. For DavidAnderson, assistant executive director with the IowaHigh School Athletic Association, “the only possiblefinancial challenge is transportation.”

When working to make accommodations forathletes with disabilities, remember that eventsmay begin to draw spectators who have mobilitylimitations, as well. Adjust seating so that someonein a wheelchair is able to have good sightlines—andto have adequate seating around them for theirfriends, either able-bodied or not. No spectatorshould be made to feel they have to sit in an areaisolated from the rest of the crowd.

Summing UpWhile there have been challenges, Gary Phillipsfound that he was pleasantly surprised by theGeorgia public’s reaction to the wheelchair divisionof races.

“The first time [we had a track in which athletesin wheelchairs competed], I had anxiety,anticipation—I was wondering, ‘How will the fansreact?’ We ran the 200 and the fans were cheeringfor the kids. They were great. Even when there’s abig distance between the kid who wins and the onewho comes in last, the spectators stayed right thereand cheered for everyone. We were able to ask allthe kids in the race, ‘Did you hear them cheering foryou?’ and they all said, ‘Yes, sir, I heard that!’ Theywere very happy.”

Note: The American Sports Builders Association(ASBA) is a nonprofit association helpingdesigners, builders, owners, operators and usersunderstand quality construction of many sportsfacilities, including track and field. The ASBAsponsors informative meetings and publishesnewsletters, books and technical constructionguidelines for athletic facilities, including runningtracks and sports fields. Available at no charge is alisting of all publications offered by the Association,as well as the ASBA’s Membership Directory. Info:866-501-ASBA (2722) or www.sportsbuilders.org.



C A M E R A AT H L E T I C A :

S A LU T E S DAV I D O L I V E R A N D A L LY S O N F E L I X

Jiro Mochizuki and Victah, www.photorun.NET

We want to congratulate

David Oliver and Allyson Felix

for winning the Jesse Owens

Awards for Male & Female

Athlete of the Year.

31Coaching Athletics Quarterly - Spring 2010


ca-winter-2011_lores

Documents

coaching spring

coaching athletics quarterly

fallwinter issue of

netcoaching winter

mary ward

group publisher

mary helen sprecheron

yearby mary helen sprecher19