ca dereg 2 0 why now glacial call to action
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Ca dereg 2 0 why now glacial call to action](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100723/58f28bea1a28ab82228b459b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
California Electricity Deregulation 2.0
Why This Time?...Why Now?
April 2010
![Page 2: Ca dereg 2 0 why now glacial call to action](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100723/58f28bea1a28ab82228b459b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Today’s Conversation Topics
Agenda Item Theme
Electricity Deregulation 2.0—Why Should We Believe You This Time?
• Discuss how Senate Bill 695 mitigates the structural and regulatory failings of the previous attempt at deregulation of the electricity market in California
Value Proposition to Property Owner—Why Does Leaving PG&E Save Me Money?
• Review PG&E rate setting process and legacy contracts
• Review current market price for wholesale energy vs. utility tariff rate
• Highlight savings opportunity for a commercial property owner to enter Direct Access market and choose an ESP
Limited Widow of Opportunity—Why Now?
• Review the size of the CAP and how it is determined for the 4 year phase in of the DA load
• Review process for switching from PG&E to an ESP (NOI and DASR)
• Discuss wait list procedures
Why Glacial Energy? • Review the advantages of partnering with Glacial Energy for less costly electricity.
Questions and Answers • Interactive Discussion
2This information is commercially confidential
![Page 3: Ca dereg 2 0 why now glacial call to action](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100723/58f28bea1a28ab82228b459b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
California Deregulation
This information is commercially confidential 3
1998
• Based on success of Natural Gas deregulation Investor Owned utilities implemented restructuring of Electricity market
• Deregulation forced divestiture of Utility generating assets
• No incentives for new generating capacity to be built
• Complex market balancing and trading rules for Energy Service Providers
2001
• Combination of high demand, low hydro, band weather, and the failure of a poorly constructed short term market resulted in a complete collapse of the electricity power system
• ESPs failed in droves and returned customers to the Utilities
• On September 20, 2001, CPUC suspended Direct Access except to customers who had valid contracts prior to this date.
2009
• On October 11, 2009, Governor Schwarzenegger signed Senate Bill (SB) 695 into law.
• SB 695 opens the Direct Access market to all Commercial Customers of the IOUs in California subject to DA market cap to be phased in over four years.
Key Milestones in the California Direct Access Market
1980’s
• CPUC allows unbundled service for commercial and industrial customers
• Customers can buy their own natural gas
• “Deregulation” of the Natural Gas market in California has worked well for nearly three decades
TheAftermath
• IOUs experienced complete financial melt-down
• State entered into long-term contracts to purchase power on behalf of IOU that will not expire until 2015
• Direct Access customers must pay for fare share of stranded costs and non by-passable costs
![Page 4: Ca dereg 2 0 why now glacial call to action](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100723/58f28bea1a28ab82228b459b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Current PG&E Rates (3/1/2010)
This information is commercially confidential 4
Rate Schedule Customer Charge Season
Time-of-Use
Period
Time-of-Use
Period
"Average" Total Rate1/
(per kWh)
Summer
Winter
On peak
Part Peak
Off Peak
Part Peak
Off Peak
Secondary Primary Transmission Secondary Primary Transmission
Summer $11.32 $10.67 $8.21 $0.14340 $0.13646 $0.11963
Winter $6.91 $6.38 $4.46 $0.10969 $0.10437 $0.09295
Peak $0.16628 $0.15712 $0.13936 Secondary $0.16515
Part-Peak $0.14370 $0.13701 $0.11995
Off-Peak $0.13026 $0.12454 $0.10838 Primary $0.15374
Part-Peak $0.11512 $0.10868 $0.09702
Off-Peak $0.10433 $0.10021 $0.08903 Transmission $0.12743
Max. Peak $13.17 $11.89 $9.16 Peak $0.15568 $0.15520 $0.11577Secondary
$0.14380
Part Peak $3.02 $2.72 $2.07 Part Peak $0.10813 $0.10603 $0.09372
Maximum $9.02 $7.88 $5.80 Off Peak $0.08871 $0.08482 $0.08054Primary $0.13709
Part Peak $1.15 $0.87 $0.00 Part Peak $0.09682 $0.09180 $0.08572
Maximum $9.02 $7.88 $5.80 Off Peak $0.08585 $0.08101 $0.07662Transmission
$0.12223
Winter$0.17091
$0.12555
A-10 Customers w ith high electric use and medium to high load factors generally benefit under Schedule A-10. Part of a customer's bill varies according to the customer's maximum monthly electric demand.
$3.94251 per meter per day
$3.94251 per meter per day
Total Energy Charge (per kWh)
$0.20495
$0.14867
$0.46177
A-1 Basic general service rate. Generally optimal rate for customers w ith low electric use and low load factors, w ith most usage during PG&E's peak and partial peak TOU periods.
Single Phase Service per meter/day
=$0.29569 Polyphase Service per meter/day
=$0.44353
Summer
$0.12152
A-6 Rates vary according to the time of day electricity is used. Typically, the A-6 rate benefits customers w ho use a signif icant percentage of their electricity during the off peak period.
Single phase service per meter/day
=$0.29569; Polyphase service per meter/day =$0.44353. Plus Meter charge =$0.20107per
day for A6 or A6X; =$0.05914 per day for
A6W3/
$6.91 $6.38 $4.46
$0.18603
$0.17945
$0.20618
0.16508
Demand Charge (per kW)
$11.32 $10.67 $8.21
A-10 TOU Customers w ith high electric use and medium to high load factors generally benefit under Schedule A-10 TOU. Part of a customer's bill varies according to the customer's maximum monthly electric demand.
Summer
Winter
Summer
Winter
Meter charge: =$4.11992/day for
E19 V or X; =$3.97799/day for
E19W2/; =$13.55236/day for
E19S mandatory; =$19.71253/day for
E19P mandatory; =$39.42505/day for
E19T mandatory
E-19 Offers demand-metered time-of-use (TOU) service. Customers likely to benefit have high electric use and high load factors and are able to use signif icant percentages of their electricity during the off-peak period. There are optional (E19V, E19 X and E19W) versions below 500 kW as w ell as E19 mandatory w hich applies to accounts w ith demands betw een 500 and 1,000 kW. See tarif f for rate limiter, pow er factor, nonfirm.
![Page 5: Ca dereg 2 0 why now glacial call to action](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100723/58f28bea1a28ab82228b459b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Direct Access Can Lower Customers Charge for Generation
This information is commercially confidential 5
Cost of Electrons Used by Customer. Could Be Provided by an ESP at Lower Rate per kWh
![Page 6: Ca dereg 2 0 why now glacial call to action](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100723/58f28bea1a28ab82228b459b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Imbedded Utility Costs Create Market Opportunity for Index Price
This information is commercially confidential 6
![Page 7: Ca dereg 2 0 why now glacial call to action](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100723/58f28bea1a28ab82228b459b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Understanding kWh Price Elements
This information is commercially confidential 7
$0.0393
$0.0744
$0.0917
$0.00
$0.01
$0.02
$0.03
$0.04
$0.05
$0.06
$0.07
$0.08
$0.09
$0.10
CAISO (NP15) GLACIAL ENERGYINDEX
PG&E E-19 TARIFF RATE
Wholesale Cost of kWh at
CAISO
• Energy Losses and Unaccounted for Energy (UFE)
• ISO charges and Other Ancillary Fees • Zonal Congestion • Capacity & Related Fees • Market Settlement Charges • Glacial Margin
Incremental Costs of kWh Embedded in Glacial Index
Source: FERC, Glacial Energy
2009 Annual Average kWh Price Comparison
![Page 8: Ca dereg 2 0 why now glacial call to action](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100723/58f28bea1a28ab82228b459b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Direct Access Capacity CAP—Limited Market Opportunity
This information is commercially confidential 8
DIRECT ACCESS CAPACITY CAP PHASE-IN BY EACH YEAR CAP Expressed Across All Three Utilities
Direct Access Market Load will be Over 14% of Total UDC Load
by 2013
0
20,000,000,000
40,000,000,000
60,000,000,000
80,000,000,000
100,000,000,000
120,000,000,000
140,000,000,000
160,000,000,000
180,000,000,000
200,000,000,000
Existing DA Load
(Left Over from 2001)
NewDA Load
(Post 2013)
UDC Load
DIRECT ACCESS CAPACITY AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL
UTILITY LOADCAP Expressed Across All Three Utilities
![Page 9: Ca dereg 2 0 why now glacial call to action](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100723/58f28bea1a28ab82228b459b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Time Line For Selecting Direct Access
This information is commercially confidential 9
• Review benefits of entering direct access
• Identify potential Energy Service Providers
• Determine pros and cons of entering Direct Access market
• Submit Notice of Intent (NOI) to the their Utility
• Indicates to utility that customer desires to enter Direct Access
• After receiving the NOI from a customer, the Utility will confirm or deny the customers reservation in the Direct Access market
• Customer must enter into a contract with an Energy Service Provider
• Energy Service Provider must submit a DASR on behalf of the customer requesting that service be switched from the Utility to the ESP
• Final meter read by Utility is completed and the ESP becomes the provider of record
Marchto April
April 16th, 2010
20 Days After NOI Submitted
July 2010
60 Days After NOI
is Affirmed