c omparing and contrasting i llinois ’ s approach with the ucfa’ s approach suppose an incident...
TRANSCRIPT
COMPARING AND CONTRASTING ILLINOIS’S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’S APPROACH
Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P and three defendants, D1, D2, & D3. D2 is either not joined in the action or is invsolvent. The case goes to trial, and the jury allocates responsibility as follows:
P 1/10
D12/10 (We could do this as percentages, but I think
D2 3/10 that ends up making it harder to visualize.)
D3 4/10
share is obviously the “missing money” (MM), and it equals 3/10 of the total: $25,200.The question is how a court following the Illinois approach would allocate the missing money and how a court following the UCFA approach would allocate the missing money.
D1 2/10
$16,800D3
4/10 $33,600
$84,000
D2 3/10
$25,200
P 1/10 $8,400
Illinois’sapproach
D1 2/10
$16,800D3
4/10 $33,600
$84,000
D2 3/10
$25,200
P 1/10$8,400
Illinois’sapproach
D1 2/10
$16,800D3
4/10 $33,600
$84,000
D2 3/10
$25,200
P 1/10 $8,400
Illinois’sapproach
D1 = 2/10D3 = 4/10How should they divide the missing money proportionally to their respective fault?
6/10
D1 = 2/10D3 = 4/10
D1: 2/10 ÷ 6/10 = 1/3
6/10
D1 = 2/10D3 = 4/10
D1: 2/10 ÷ 6/10 = 1/3D3: 4/10 ÷ 60% = 2/3
D3 is twice as much at fault as D1;
D3 should pay twice as much of the missing money as D1
6/10
D1 2/10
$16,800D3
4/10$33,600
$84,000
D2 3/10
$25,200
P 1/10 $8,400
Illinois’sapproach
D1: 2/10 ÷ 6/10 = 1/3D3: 4/10 ÷ 6/10 = 2/3MM = $25,2001/3 * MM = D1’s share = $8,400
D1: 2/10 ÷ 6/10 = 1/3D3: 4/10 ÷ 6/10 = 2/3MM = $25,2001/3 * MM = D1’s share of MM = $8,400D1’s Total = $16,800 (D1’s original share) + $8,400 = $25,200
D1: 2/10 ÷ 6/10 = 1/3D3: 4/10 ÷ 6/10 = 2/3MM = $25,2002/3 * MM = D3’s share = $16,800
D3’s Total = $33,600 (D3’s original share) + $16,800 = $50,400
Illinois’sapproach
P 1/10$8,400
$84,000
D1 3/10
$25,200D3
6/10$50,400
D1 2/10
$16,800D3
4/10$33,600
$84,000
D2 3/10
$25,200
P 1/10$8,400
UCFA’sapproach
P = 1/10D1 = 2/10D3 = 4/10How should they divide the missing money proportionally to their respective fault?
7/10
P = 1/10D1 = 2/10D3 = 4/10P: 1/10 ÷ 7/10 = 1/7D1: 2/10 ÷ 7/10 = 2/7D3: 4/10 ÷ 7/10 = 4/7
7/10
MM = $25,200P: 1/7 * MM = $3,600D1: 2/7 * MM = $7,200D3: 4/7 * MM = $14,400
P: 1/7 * MM = $3,600 + $8,400 (P’s original share) = $12,000D1: 2/7 * MM = $7,200 + $16,800 (D1’s original share) = $24,000D3: 4/7 * MM = $14,400 + $33,600 (D3’s original share) = $48,000
123
P 1/7 $12,000
D1 2/7
$24,000
D3 4/7
$48,000
$84,000
UCFA’sapproach
Illinois’sapproach
P 1/10
$8,400$84,000
D1 3/10
$25,200D3
6/10
$50,400