c omparing and contrasting i llinois ’ s approach with the ucfa’ s approach suppose an incident...

19
COMPARING AND CONTRASTING ILLINOIS’S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’S APPROACH Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P and three defendants, D 1 , D 2 , & D 3 . D 2 is either not joined in the action or is invsolvent. The case goes to trial, and the jury allocates responsibility as follows: P 1 / 10 D 1 2 / 10 (We could do this as percentages, but I think D 2 3 / 10 that ends up making it harder to visualize.) D 3 4 / 10 share is obviously the “missing money” (MM), and it equals 3 / 10 of the total: $25,200. The question is how a court following the Illinois approach would allocate the missing money and how a court following the UCFA approach would allocate the missing money.

Upload: adam-garrison

Post on 18-Jan-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: C OMPARING AND CONTRASTING I LLINOIS ’ S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’ S APPROACH Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P

COMPARING AND CONTRASTING ILLINOIS’S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’S APPROACH

Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P and three defendants, D1, D2, & D3. D2 is either not joined in the action or is invsolvent. The case goes to trial, and the jury allocates responsibility as follows:

P 1/10

D12/10 (We could do this as percentages, but I think

D2 3/10 that ends up making it harder to visualize.)

D3 4/10

share is obviously the “missing money” (MM), and it equals 3/10 of the total: $25,200.The question is how a court following the Illinois approach would allocate the missing money and how a court following the UCFA approach would allocate the missing money.

Page 2: C OMPARING AND CONTRASTING I LLINOIS ’ S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’ S APPROACH Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P

D1 2/10

$16,800D3

4/10 $33,600

$84,000

D2 3/10

$25,200

P 1/10 $8,400

Illinois’sapproach

Page 3: C OMPARING AND CONTRASTING I LLINOIS ’ S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’ S APPROACH Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P

D1 2/10

$16,800D3

4/10 $33,600

$84,000

D2 3/10

$25,200

P 1/10$8,400

Illinois’sapproach

Page 4: C OMPARING AND CONTRASTING I LLINOIS ’ S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’ S APPROACH Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P

D1 2/10

$16,800D3

4/10 $33,600

$84,000

D2 3/10

$25,200

P 1/10 $8,400

Illinois’sapproach

Page 5: C OMPARING AND CONTRASTING I LLINOIS ’ S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’ S APPROACH Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P

D1 = 2/10D3 = 4/10How should they divide the missing money proportionally to their respective fault?

6/10

Page 6: C OMPARING AND CONTRASTING I LLINOIS ’ S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’ S APPROACH Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P

D1 = 2/10D3 = 4/10

D1: 2/10 ÷ 6/10 = 1/3

6/10

Page 7: C OMPARING AND CONTRASTING I LLINOIS ’ S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’ S APPROACH Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P

D1 = 2/10D3 = 4/10

D1: 2/10 ÷ 6/10 = 1/3D3: 4/10 ÷ 60% = 2/3

D3 is twice as much at fault as D1;

D3 should pay twice as much of the missing money as D1

6/10

Page 8: C OMPARING AND CONTRASTING I LLINOIS ’ S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’ S APPROACH Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P

D1 2/10

$16,800D3

4/10$33,600

$84,000

D2 3/10

$25,200

P 1/10 $8,400

Illinois’sapproach

Page 9: C OMPARING AND CONTRASTING I LLINOIS ’ S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’ S APPROACH Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P

D1: 2/10 ÷ 6/10 = 1/3D3: 4/10 ÷ 6/10 = 2/3MM = $25,2001/3 * MM = D1’s share = $8,400

Page 10: C OMPARING AND CONTRASTING I LLINOIS ’ S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’ S APPROACH Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P

D1: 2/10 ÷ 6/10 = 1/3D3: 4/10 ÷ 6/10 = 2/3MM = $25,2001/3 * MM = D1’s share of MM = $8,400D1’s Total = $16,800 (D1’s original share) + $8,400 = $25,200

Page 11: C OMPARING AND CONTRASTING I LLINOIS ’ S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’ S APPROACH Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P

D1: 2/10 ÷ 6/10 = 1/3D3: 4/10 ÷ 6/10 = 2/3MM = $25,2002/3 * MM = D3’s share = $16,800

D3’s Total = $33,600 (D3’s original share) + $16,800 = $50,400

Page 12: C OMPARING AND CONTRASTING I LLINOIS ’ S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’ S APPROACH Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P

Illinois’sapproach

P 1/10$8,400

$84,000

D1 3/10

$25,200D3

6/10$50,400

Page 13: C OMPARING AND CONTRASTING I LLINOIS ’ S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’ S APPROACH Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P

D1 2/10

$16,800D3

4/10$33,600

$84,000

D2 3/10

$25,200

P 1/10$8,400

UCFA’sapproach

Page 14: C OMPARING AND CONTRASTING I LLINOIS ’ S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’ S APPROACH Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P

P = 1/10D1 = 2/10D3 = 4/10How should they divide the missing money proportionally to their respective fault?

7/10

Page 15: C OMPARING AND CONTRASTING I LLINOIS ’ S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’ S APPROACH Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P

P = 1/10D1 = 2/10D3 = 4/10P: 1/10 ÷ 7/10 = 1/7D1: 2/10 ÷ 7/10 = 2/7D3: 4/10 ÷ 7/10 = 4/7

7/10

Page 16: C OMPARING AND CONTRASTING I LLINOIS ’ S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’ S APPROACH Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P

MM = $25,200P: 1/7 * MM = $3,600D1: 2/7 * MM = $7,200D3: 4/7 * MM = $14,400

Page 17: C OMPARING AND CONTRASTING I LLINOIS ’ S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’ S APPROACH Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P

P: 1/7 * MM = $3,600 + $8,400 (P’s original share) = $12,000D1: 2/7 * MM = $7,200 + $16,800 (D1’s original share) = $24,000D3: 4/7 * MM = $14,400 + $33,600 (D3’s original share) = $48,000

Page 18: C OMPARING AND CONTRASTING I LLINOIS ’ S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’ S APPROACH Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P

123

P 1/7 $12,000

D1 2/7

$24,000

D3 4/7

$48,000

$84,000

UCFA’sapproach

Page 19: C OMPARING AND CONTRASTING I LLINOIS ’ S APPROACH WITH THE UCFA’ S APPROACH Suppose an incident in which P suffers a total loss of $84,000, involving P

Illinois’sapproach

P 1/10

$8,400$84,000

D1 3/10

$25,200D3

6/10

$50,400