c. o. alo. 3 t.s--s--9 - :m - washington petition for review.pdf · tzc.vii!:vv 71-ll:c i)iccjs/on...

SupR..£M£ e.our<T

c. o. /'J Alo. 3 t.s--s--9 - 8 ~ :m:

!:>1..1/}-C;t; NQ. o/2797-"'1

o;:-- 71-1/S- ST"AT£ Or WAS.NI/\16--Tt::JA/

STA-Te Or WA.Sf/;;Vv=rt:J/\1,

R.!ESflOA/b!ENT,

v.

M/IT77-/£W S/MC;v fJ-AROt.J7T£1

pt:.TtTI<J;v£R..

N/.47T/f13'W .S · (j,i!Jlf.Ot .. :I7T£ q:/~ ~'-/ 0 !'it:;

<...oyol/£ Rtt)(;-/3_ C..o~Z/?.£):: ... 1/0;v <:..&ViZ~

p.c. Acx 741?

<:...JJNI',Jic'-'-, wA. 9'13 <._(()

tZC.VII!:VV 71-ll:c i)ICCJS/ON M/1./JE. 13'1 711/C <:....octr<.T oF /1,4r;J£AL...S, J'j!VIS/OAI 3 1

t&vtl!:.A!..ED otv JANt..AA-1?. '1 zh 1

ZLJ/&J i3 '1 c..Htt.::.r= Jt~JI)(r£., 'S tllbOvvA'f, ,,-v A"'v wvpvi.3L!SHE.L)

,ssw£ 1 : Mk o-,.:u~o ... .rn-c 's l<N:..,Hr To A s,.o££t.l y TR!.4l. i.,t/'1.11)£1"? c_.,.. /<' .3. 3 >v-"'~ s

vrot,AT£./J wflc/-1.1 11-1£. 7/e.t.4L COI_f~T n.t~-/L . .G.!J TO /-lAVE ll/5 T.r.(/4<.. 13£/-o.-u_· TilE t,.o iJ-"'-·'7

I

<::..Lo'\..1<' 7·o ('10) DA'-'fS A;:ll:!A! tr t)bV/EtJ Iff£: S71"1-7£~" t//7o770rl! 7<:) <::..0/\1/It"\11...1£) ,...._, v;ot.AT!t.:>v

I ~f/.4~Cr£ t]I::<::AUS£. tT r;4/L~. 7"0 C.ON/.-9//V ALL TH.C:. cSSbV'/7./If. £L£A4~/V1T c.1r' T/Y.t:- (/(?t..rw.c;

fl\1 VIOLA-TtOI'\I 0~ HI') .'St'K7i'l AN/) /'(/U,4/,6.6-V7"f/ AMI£1\1/JI'l4.C::rv''T /?./(t·!-17" 7"0 77/[ L..J.S. <!-ONS/":

ol'l .JUL'f 3, l...C/3 Tt-1£ Sif.JT£ F/L~/) AN tA!/O;<!MA-7lor.J UM~O-IAiv-1 MA71fi£W S.

uARourrc., {;.;~:.Re'"' At=rc~, M/<. 0-AI~owTil:.) w·lrrl ON£ ~ouAI'r of ;>o-ss.c:..s:st<J.W o~·

,tVJ.EIHAMpNE..IAMII'\JIE:. ( st:.c~ I•VIc0R;I/!,J97l<O"'v I'll .4,0,0£:AID/l()

ON .AUV.UST l&l, l-013 Mt:J.. 0-AI.?..Ot.ATTt:. W/IS ARl? . .ES/£/J Al\/b Arl-4/)1'.. A j)~i"L/•Idl/l/-"lli?'1

4/)/)EA1<.4N<:.E. •

sc../-1£./)uL/III(r O~D.EI~ WAS 1£tVT"£1(1!j), ( SE.E. <:s.~.JeiJt..fLIAI(r tDI'?.i>.E;<? D;4T£L) 8'•Z..<J•I3 ;r-11 Aj'1_.t7.c;..vo/X")

C;v ,4U(ri.JIST 23, Z.d/3 TH£ ~Ov/.l.T ~NT£1'!£.0 .4AI ~~/J£1? /£S7,481../S#t/V(;- <:(.;.>;VOIVON.f

/1/,C.vv C../ll"'r?(r{. c/-' tOO.SS£SS:I<JAf VVt7'1! tA/TENr~

o.r.J JA-NI.f,"}./Q.'? -:u, '2./J/t/ A MOltON TO Rt::.SET I)A-7E"> vv/IS COAI'Tkv'U.CLJ 7iL£.. 7/1.£

f'oU..Owi/V(r w££K.

01\l .Jt</NI..JA/(!'1 2.8, Z..0/<1 THE.. ST/'1-T£. FILI:.IJ Al'l/ A.v~E-vtJ£.tJ t;v,Lio~t"/t1ATIO;v c.,AI,4~<rttV(r

oiJNt:.. .4bDI7UJntA L <:.vuN1. o;:: BA;L .JvtN>,o;rv<J-. ( s.C'.t. AME.t-vaE..tJ '"'t~o-'<,v;A77tON /N A/-7.4c.N.dl x)

Tf/£.. t::._(/UFI{./ AL...SO £1VTEA!£.1J A 1\/LYV sc:._H£1JULIAiv- Ct(!/)£/~ w;1"!-l N.C.:.vv t)t4Jk.S o,C:

T/2./.4(: 3- l'j -N

(Stt S.~ri£./J,t..J£../Nv- C.lf.!.bi[R_ 641'£0 I· '!..8 ·/'t tAl A;?;?£/'\/ Oil()

Grl t::£/Jt<t..AAr<Z'-1 If, ZoN t)c~£NSi;_ ~OU/\IS/.!::L ,-:,:£9u£s/£;j 7"11.4-1' Olf.4N113t.JS t].t:; S£T Otr.C./.?

TG r:-.c/3. 2'-1, 2.01'1.

CtV f'£13/<.UAJe"/ Lt./, 2.01</ OMN!/3Uf VVA'S' 1/A./) AAIIJ "]. 5': :J.(o 1-//3..4/<!/I'V(rS w£t((E SE...F

1-::01<. .tVJAt!<.C/-1 ~. Zol'/· ( Slf.£. t4//;4CHL1) ONINI($1.4<; <Q,-etJ.c/.? 1..-.1 A/}/}.£A;LJ; J()

,4VAtf..AI.!:,L£. • Mti?. (r;<JteOI..tf/£ cBJe~TS TO Al'l/·'1 '<.IOrl/!NUA'-•·vt,(!",

Cr-1 IVIA.-ec.t-1 /.?., ::Z.(.)!</ TN£ ktVAjJS7rJI') ,4..-111') J. s; j'.<(o r/[,41ellv<.··S" w£/.?£ ;/,.a.d.

' <:..Or..l'f/,YUA-AIC£. Trl[ <:._<;<.A/~7 /)tE_iV/c-1) Tr/£ STiQ.TI:':S ;f/lfOTIOAI 13EC.-<l<Af£ 1'7 rvr:Jf rV<JT /1

·,~.C.-<J'5oi'VI'I/U.£ !Jr?S/'5 ;::or;__ /1 (.OrV7/rviJ/l.AlC£., s;,.tJ-T£ TI'I.C"N l'f/£7'1JEST /1/M?. ()-,4~c,u/7;t,~ 8£

1~£L£.4S£/J 01'f (jY:l.) t3o..v/.). T/?1/H. <:._Q-'11'/I/!/IJI!..·t] orvc· vv£..£K TO Zf(>T/7 A/V() OuTSrtJ.t!. /J19-T.C

,, C"JJJ:3:t:.I/Or11 K[: b.0-vt.4L o;::. 77/VlE Fotf! ·r~tr'll... ( Sl!.t: M£.11/tO;<!IALI Z"" TIO,..V /)A 7.et) j ./? ·/'/

A-At~ M/l,q. e ~~ <vtlf (Jt«t)C£ 1r..t Af?/'c ... -v/.J~'X.) !3o7/"' /'l9teTI.t£.'i ,)£L,4/.ZC. K.c..ao 7 /'o~ pe;.-9('

c-r .. .t MA-RC..f/ 31, <.ol'/ IH..C t:..Ot.Ar?.T c/\177.:.;(£1.) A . N'£W S(/-lctk/L!/1/(r t.;~t),t;'l't vvrl// /\/.Cvt/

(s££ sc.H£/Jt..Ju,v<--· cte!JC£ ;).4TLI.\ 3, 31·1<1 "v A;&,/.l.c.rvo/K.}

·rf/L C-Ot:-!K<.T /it-50 C.rVrl!:.-1((£i) "/AI Ot~tJ£;~ 4M[/'VO/AI(r <: ... ::;N/)IT/<.,/'1/f' c/' i?ELE/IS-<3_, (56£ oi?tJ£~

,4/)fl!Et'I/I}JJ()

<;rl A/)fl.IL 7, Zt:Jt</ 'iNC. C..OLI~T £;V7,CteE.I) AA! OleiJtYl /""()~ /'1 13£;v<fl vv-4~/E',t?rv/, (s.t:t::

01~.i)E~ Lvn:E: IJ '/- 7. 1 </ 11V A/J/:J£ N/)J,'A. )

DA7C'S oF:

3

O"' M/1"1 !31

zott./ b.€1--E.tvs·£ <:..oul'tsr.:c FtLLtJ A ,-vJ<Yrt<J/" 7<::> t);r:-vu.l·s For.<> v;ot-.ATI'V/'V

cF 77/!rlc ror.~ n-et~ L r<.uLE.. ( st:..c ;VIO rtort~ 1·o i)ISMI'H hLt=.tJ /VI;<'/1 13, <-oiL/ ~'~'V Ar';-?L,.,;tJ/x)

c~v .Nl/-1'1 1"!, Zollf t':)t:..;-=t::./vS£ Z.OUArS£.L FtL£o A SL.!p/)t.£~1/l.c>v7r~l. .t14f()TIOf'\l T<J DISMISs;

Fo~e vtoLA/tc.,r>/ ol: Ttll--11!.. Fc!Xl r/'trA.L r:?ut..£, (s.ti?: -sq1{}/)l..£M£rVT4t.. Mv770AJ 7"o tJ;sA-t;ss

,)!1-TE t) s- ·18 · t'/ Pv AtJtdf:C.rVIJt x)

orJ .;VI/1.'-7 ::?.3, 201</ M.-~. tr,4~0u7T(: •v-4s Fo~v!Ait) (NJ/0-7 l3y /1 Jut/12'1 oF Tr/.E t3.41L

J~"'"r/)trv(r ~fl,t;.IQ.(r£ 4Nt) /OtJNr.J (}utt..T<7 or:· 7/i,c.· td<J=>SI£S.'SIC:."'V .:Jt= .-<J cor.l//r!(>Lt.t::t) S"v-<S.r7..4;,!'c.("

Cl'll'll<<i-£ t)IJ/ !<(! 1'1} (r /J U!V 1 T ..4 Kk, .. H . .J te "I /x? 1,4 L /3 '? A J 1.-l L) (rc,

oN Jurv£ 10, zot'-1 tJ£F,c.--v_st;, C.J.JI..An.ISE.L At..c.Ll A ,oV?o77or..t /o/r! ,4/r!;f?t:rr o/ J~..~tJt.-..vl&vT

AND S'Ti'l"'? o/' /[><£.<:..1./iTION o/"' 'SU\/1£,;-,;c.£ ;9£/tii.JI.--v(J- 4;'Jtd£,tt(.. ( S£t: /I/-Z4C.S T' Q;:- .Jut)(J-#Ic/t/7

1JftT£d /.o· "'·It/ lr\t A,&_p'}..t;/VtJ/1<)

ON .Jt...IN£ ~31 201<1 0£/::,C/yJ'£ <:..outVS/C.L //L£L) A N0/"1(..£ Or A,&j".J.t:."/1(, (sEc- /\-'0/IC£ //VA/);&e;-vdiX}

0 ,v Jllrl/uA!<?.y -z.t.p/ 2.0/(c 711!3.. ~(1'1...11\:''r IJ;:- Aj!)j".J.c:'At..<i iJti/1'510/'V 'TI/R£1£' r/t..£1) Al'lf' WIV/)Ufl:,L/'51/E(j

of?/N(Orl hroiJIAf(r ,vo. 13./~A!o.t? ote A/5U<;£: t::Jr Olft/1£"1"'/crv. (r<£ 0/JNVI<{,//V r;t.;:!tJ )/?.1'11,-Z.(IJ, eo/~

trll AiJ/)£/VtJI i<')

£, A!<./.)UM£.NT

K.Ar-J 13· s-· (b) c_o,-vSttJc/<',-'JTI<:JAIS O·<Jv£1'(!/,,t,.v'(r A(.<Lj!JI/trvC.£ ol::: ;Q£v;.t='vv•

,, I)ISVf!.£77orl/l...e 7 t<?.l£.t/tliw o,C -"'/'\/ t/'\17£/fL.ocw/-o/2'1 /)li..<:.t~to,.v ol" TrtL C.<Ju/Cr o.1·'

.4f'fl.C..4t.s w1LL 13£. A-t:.:.<:...t;-?:r.cJJ 137 w.c· 5u,&X?£1'V't£ c.ou..-er oAtL 7 :

(1) tf" TN£ &t.tk'.T <..!;: ..4;-:7;-:?L,"/(r ;-//1-f co.MA4t/TCIJ /IN o13Vt(/(,.(J .C~/<?0~ vvr/IUI v-Vc.'vtt../.J

t<!£r.tt}C~ ru;>'!('7?·1£/l fJFtv'-££t)triCr·I ~..-ts.e.:u:-;s; o,q

01 ,;:: rt-1.1:! <:Jr~...t/?.7"" o,.: A,PJ;'7k.A<.r f//lf so /;-.,,~ tJc'/-:7-'l..:?i:C .. # F;<(;Ar1 7/.tc· A<:..t£1-&T..<:.'t-1 /kvo

I.JSI.AA-L t::.JOU/IQ.S£ o/' ..lv/.~/C/.41.. iJ/lO-:..£LOIIVCrS, •• .")S TO 0'lLL rOA! 'THI:.- £.;rt:.".Je<:.ts,£ o/ ;<.t:.'VtSO.r.!'?

Jull.tSb!GIOI'\I 8'1 rf/£ s~..,/ll'l.;k'ME. <:.o(A.-~/. Rl1tJ t'J.r (b)(t)(3)

tS~'--'1(. I: MA!. 0-AA!OuTT£. '5 R.I(J-HT 'TO A S;"'/£cr.J'7 'T/'ZI/.1(. u,,ttJ,C~ ~rX? $. 3 WAS

vtt:CJL,4'T£il vv/-lk.A! T/-1£ 'TI0/7( ~ovn..'T /AIL£/.} T<J r!AVIE f/IS r/t?I/-JL t3£.ro,-e£ 771£ 4;o ·

bA-.., ~Lo~t< C..><(JI~X.ctJ ;21eto~ ro 1'/t> t:Z£<.£19!6:.

rH£ T/21/K C:_(/1.-f/Q.T 1S l'l.,ES(J<>/\/St.SL£ fCol'? AssuJetN6- .4 '>tdei:t1'7 r~;r;L Ul'\ll)£;e

<::..!'~ 3-3. SlAT£ V. (C_A/l50tv1 t28 VVI"l· z.d f)O~ (t9'1<.tJ). TH£ fl0!~/-JOSt:::" Ul'1.ii),<:",r.;?LyNv<.r f:..l'~

3,3 IS TO /)t"<.•aT£~T .A t)t£.r"EIV'rJ.4,-vT'S. t:._()N:ST/ri...,f/t<Jr.IAL £tO··t'I"T ?'o J.(!l££/)'7 7"/e/AL • s;r;.p.lc

V· A/]/1.~1<. 1 \i9 WYl•<d 78'8, 7?1-9<?. (t97S')· /ILS'01

7'C ;tJt<I-OV/1..)£ .A /JAoMtJT 7/{!1..<1( I:Or.l T/'1£

. ~

!)£.FctVfJ.4Nt oN>::£ tJr.!..OS;.£<U .. A'"f'/()Pv IS ;..Vr7!/-17£./). 5'/';>9-/t:.. /('. £t)v~r.4AZI.Jf, <Jf./ vVYI• <..d ZCK', V(p (1980).

tJI'ZA::.JVIt)K£ t/' 77'/.C' V.J£t.:.IJ 7 'flet.4( /-)£f<!lo{j 1.-/'I;'JSC:S vv;?f/OuT -~ TI'<J.4L, 'i./A-T~· v. St?uNIJ.C'~s;

;<;'3 wl'7· <"~/J/1· .z.c <}, ~t<o -17 ( <.O<:) '>). ;JA-ST £. x;?e~1crvu J./Aj" 5/fowt-V' rN/1-T 1.,./AtL..CSS ..4 sJ~It:F

~J....tL£ 1'1. .4(7;?£.1[1)~ T/'1£ lei(N'I7 TO. rl s_r-;>.c:CJ7 TA!t-41. /JS vv£.Lt.. Ar //'/£ ,.;VJ;c"(J•<Y/'7 o/'

7/'f£ J"--tlt~IA-L !Mlot..I.£SS 1 <!J"'NNCJT /3~ ,£;:h,:'(./7v.L'l'1 ;');(?1£'f>c.~t--£.1J • '5.'1/97£ v. S7't"IK-t'A", lf7

11-1'7· <-d 8'7o, ~ n (t??<. )·

~ure.r r.e.<..tl.£S, /..../K.~¢." Sl/4-{UTt::\', ~·HouUJ tJ£ C..01'VS1t1?U~tJ 1"() /-0$/;{!_"A" 1/f.e.· /)t...IA?/-'OS'£

rot'? vvHt'\.1-/ TH£'? w.EA'c" £AIA't.7£JJ, IAI-4£ MC<:rLo7HL£rl', ';i? W;'7.<-cl:r;s; s··e·~ (1'7J>J).

wi-I£A! !A!T£re;::J!'Z£Tirv(r ~oui(L 7 r.!!VIL..C. S, Til£ C.<Ju,-e,T rl/-7/-}AO,.tfC/-1/!.S 71'/[ t<Jr • .JL£S' .•"IX 7/louo-1"/

'TJI.E.~.o1 t-/,.41) ht::L.'.t-v IJ/f/1;:-J-;c;J 13 7 If!£ t..cv·ISL./l/1...,/~~. S:7;47x! v. Arl<:..t.-v/y/<£, <;e vl/1'7• ~o-/ &~'-'

cor.tsr.;eu.::. rile ;<u<..£ t"'-" Acc.o.-e-6 11v1717' TN£ i)!'f>/P/77.-v~ 13o1Jy 's- trv7£/vT. Ct{fU-""'-'=.'-7' v.

vvVRL£.'1, ;)"[( >V17• ;z,,j 1./001

1./(p(p (<?.(.101.11)• 1/' TN£. fi!viLI£'S M.CA-nlt/V(;. tt; UAIAM/31(;-<.AOUS

<~c.:TURt:l. N££..1') /.-()OK 1'\10 /-'U;<!_TI/!Et'?. 'Sf7r:Jk'A'PV.E C()U/111"'-I V• Sjf/£VA{7'7 .Au/0 ,f 7;-?U<U<

(Jt"'l.ri)'T'!tV(r, ltV'C.1

t'S" j /;V/'7. ~of 2-s~, :?.1/9 (~<;<:}<./)

;--o t=rvsul'<[ rl f)£.f'£1\f/)ArJT THAIS AW/II'i/tV(..o. Tte;,;qL 11'11 'J//tt'; liAr /1 T~l/9( ..v;i7-/t;v IN£

,41-i...oi"TE/j T'l.tVIc 01:: &o /)!"''yl ot? It-I.E. <:::.f/t'l~(J-[5.' Ar::t<:: t)l'.i#/6T.t.'/J, C.rJS£1. . ./IW ALS() bi!Jt4U'!;

'ir/A-1 '';H£ TR;.4L C..Q(J/?.T t'S r.(£'S/)¢h/SN3L£ rt...·r:l A<;)tJI'<thl(r A S/)£c0y 7~1/IL UA!OLI? Cr/13.].''/

s. rt4T£ v. <:J~~<sor..r. '~8 wn- :c<l 8'0 t (19?1.,).

(b)(i)(/)(1).

(b) 'i?Mk:. /-<:J/l 7/.!ML.

(1) D£.FE.rvi.JIJNT btETA tf\JI.U) tAl j/J.IL,

(3) tr{£.L6/!'S(. or t)cf''£,·vt.J/IN'7,

'' I~ A J)C.I-£.rviJ.4r./r 15 ~J£1._/[I"JS.€:/J FR.o/14 .J,f!ltL 13£t=Ca£ 77-IC: (pO D/1.'1 1'7/V?/:." /...t/VltT

t-//IS £X/)I/q,t-_-;J, Tf/£. LIMIT SHA/..L 6L.' £ >CT£;t./Q.<U) 70 9'0 D/1-v t :•

TIME l..tMt7 c><;Jt/<.'.£/J,

J1J1L ~d.,-,t,/) vvA-S S/tl.-L i>£. T;4t/11£d i/1.1' );:;t<..., 1-/IJ ltJ<o !)l'l-'-1 TIA->11'- ;::<:;a Ti"ZI'-"1( j'JC4'JOO /-)<;&;;re,t:,t)

.t:..r\1 MAiec.f/ tU, <_ott/ r.i€OM /11£ t::..OM;'t-?£AIC£;t-rl(,v/ /)AT£ 41"1/lj vv/1'>1'1.1' T ,tr?C:.LL:/f;,;I[.IJ TILL

MA"lOI 31, Zoll./ vvllt<Ui /)I.AT 1-/f/V/ !C tJ.4'?f 144'/7 Htf ~0 i)~ 7/.Mt> t=~"<AM£, 77-lt.J~ 1F

J),i'JAft AL..Lovv Ttfr._ ~1/UR.-7 70 £><T.£.1'Vt.l 7rl£ <;;&.f3.£tl'7 l'.r<MC.. o:_ot./c lo c:;o t)A'-?f t..iLTt,n/IJZ'J.,;

1/toL.A-rtAI(r C./'a 3 .. '3 ~/[.'fl...ll""?l .. v(r i)JS/f/ltSJ/'J(,

rH£ T/.'1.4(. c:..ou/!r Fuam.c;e /IV<N<J wt_t::;)(J..£/j TI'M T ,,-.·· /l&tC w£/!£ <:.lf/1-rvc~-t:L) ro

'SION."'7U.A:t£ i3tYviJ, 111/J.T wt.::>UI....IjNT (JteQ/JUU t-It<; R.t.:J.-c"As.t:..· /.J£C...t'!'-'1Ui: II£'>/~ C..vJS7r;)t)'1'''

( vte/}· fJ<'r s''<) -)I )• MAJ, (j-4-tr!Oi._,l'/7£ .di.S() ,4(J/<'££ 'r INtTH THt:.. Cot...,i~l's rJr11r1L '('it'> •

lA/ "!:.71"1-Tt.=.. v. MI..II\J<J"'L, THE 77(?;,4(. C..<:.JLI~T .11-L.LJ.c>W£/) 1~/£ /}.t.?05£<::.JviTOX! ;-o A?CL.t!>'IS.([ ,-/'l,c

fjc/"'£rVt11'/.,-vF Drv HIS Ovv/V ~£C.<::.(rtV/Z..4rvcL TO E }(/e;'lld TN£ s_r-1£[,0'7 //<14·'- ~L<0"-1<' /)t/tt:: 70

,A t<£'1 'S.·rri-T.C WtTN£H f//lVtN&- TO LkAV£. 11-/.f. CI()I .. AAT W/ErVT 10~ T() !>?,4-T£:

'' wHF.::rv A JUt)(nE ,e.£.L£.;1/SES /1 Dci£rl/tJt(JrVT F~t.JOM <:.<..!510tJ 7 , n/1£ "JO ,j,:J.'1

LtMtt· IJf!.C.OMk'S' tcff.£.0::.TW£ ttl.R.t.:."S(J£(;;7/v£. t:o/'" vv/I£TI-IIC.~ tiE IS ..e.t:.LEI'1'S£iJ

r~OM ~-I.(STOD'-f JON Ttl,{ l.qT/f t)A"I Ote /.()<OfH JA'-';, •• T!f£Je£ IS NO VI<JUJ-770i"\\

()r· <Ufl :~. 3 S.o l....orl(r AS T!f£ IIV~L I<; ~VITHI/v ?0 t)A-·t-rS of. AI(_I(JA/v;/l/t#l£rvT

w1TH tlL'.:L.LM.Q!f.,§, __ 7t-1.4r:f..._ ((Jo <:>f J.f!OS£ ,:)~_1 1/\.1 ~u.sn)~::, ·~ (E~~<•!)f//I.Jts ntoi).C:t.l)

Mt....ifv<:J't, 410 wl"/.19-/)/-'· ·'IV (!99t)

rHc f'/IC.:/S 11\1 'TH£ /VIU1110'l. <:..4f.t: At<!e SoM6. wH/1-T S/Mti.JJI'? TO ,A//R. (jyt'//o!t::>I.AiTc'S th/ /1'/A-/

rt-!.t. sl/1-rt:: SvUCd-17- !'<£L£Ar£ Dt-- T#C iJ£r:~viJ.4r17 t3£C/Jus£ .. _.;:: A 1-<cv vl//771/.t"H ,._;or 13-t:;.-,t(r

AvA/(;4/JL£. • tl rv/1-'\ AL5o borVtf 70 £. ><'7£FvtJ TH/£. $(J£cLJ'7 1/<Z/.4( <:.Loc.l<'' /3vl <.;,.;£ iJ;;:/;E,-r?K/vT

/·'A<:. rote. £xtsT T!.ft4T THIS C.(flJ~ . .'T "lct{LI lA!<£ rV<.>Tt'\.£ o/.

1) Tf/tf-7' .MI?. (r/J/(_(;JuTT£ WAS' N£1/£~ ~cL£.4<;;~,;.tJ ,C/!oM JI"JtL 13/1~1<' .tN?V' 7/Y,£ c....0..V1Mvl;tltr'1

L/k£. MI..ANO'Z. WIIS f!.~I(J?t!! {0 T/..J£. 4J<o f>/1'7 /J£.4-0Lirv'[,·

!VI/?, C.rAII?<:IU'7T.( /VIA-/:£ t::.01'\I'/11VUIMV· t.:X5J£<:.77<Jrv'S 7'Q Ar'l'-t C..0/\1'77/VUr1niUT1

,/1/?A/).t:. MUI...17/)4£

1/IO'TIONS 70 /J!S'tldll'{ 13.-?S.e:·l) Crt' t/IOLA-7/o,.-v> cl"· /!If sj?C:C"tJ '7 71</A<.. ~/(rt·/T, AvJ QL3j,C(!_T;t:/.J

TO t-1/S Y<.t.L.t;d).(_ TO L'x'7Z"!Vd 71'1[ Splu1J'7 ne;A(. C.LOt.k. /#IS tN Tt..tt<!AI, .r1..e'.e"J•-A'LI!C.,£/) M/!·

&tM!CA .. /17.( 11'1 77-1/1-:T 1-/£ <:...<fV!LO rv.OT 1-/I''W.C: A S;?££/J';I 1/'.?IA-C. .V.O«? r.tLU:tVE. 'i7-lt( I':J;f((,4~k'

~1!.1...1{.~; Ilk. ASK"i !rltr; ¢-O'U~T 'TO (JY?I9?V'1" -"?.£1/tEvv 41'Vd tJt'i/VI/5J 13o711 ~C.VrVJT.

/SSu.£ Z.: Til£ TI\'/AI... C.V,_JieT tEI'<I'C!E.tl vvf-/£rV tT 4i..l...owk.IJ ir/£ "S'rx<T£ Tl'..l l'f!eL.t:/lfe ,"'f/(!,

()v<lte(/1...,/Tl'E.. ON UAIT£./\IAI:JI..£ IJY.?c:l"-lrv,M T() F-Y:lbllt~ TI-ll£. S;&££1)'1 TRIA-L "-LoU< 7"0 (90) ;.)A'-ff

Af7£J<? (T 1)£/viE..IJ THE. <;rA-rk.'s .Mc77o.n.' TO <:..<:JrvT1NUt:., /A.I vtct..~lo.--v .:;;!"' TH<C vvl'f'>"JJt,..,l(rTvv

(~Cf'./'ST!i'(fl/01'\1 .4~TIC:.../..~ I $.C.C.71Cvv /0.

V· Jofh'VSOAi, IO'l wn. :Zd '1<, 'f(o {t"ifi<P)· A-/'ll A;CJ/?£LL/l-7£ ~C/1..4/27 VVtC..L ;V<CJ7' i)IS/U~/.3 7/'/£

pt?/A-L ~V'U.-tTS M'\'JSIO..V <.-1/vL£.\"5' 71-1£ 4/?/'6LLA.--.17 /Vl~K£ r ,A ~U,.!!Z.-f? S#OM/'N'Vv- T/'/-<1.7 77/£

,4<:../<tVovvL.CiJvt:'tJ 11-1.4-1 rtf£ r::./lrt:: vvou<-Ll ;lAve: 70 13c C.!"'?GU::.d 7H#T wC:t.l/V[J';J~ Lrll.<:'

197/1], T/1£. ~XA..IA..T A-L!:O tNdtC.4-T£tJ tT C.A-/'VT ~On/77/VU,t{ 1;;- /.3£(/IUS'~· T.h'.CA,'?,Cf ;VC)

77M,C:L,_1 ~/AL /.),str.C 70 <::OI'l/7'/I'·Vt...-I.C ,r TO ,<T!Vd /r/.4-T t'T <.<:n.rtLLJrJT (.VIVS!I.)£...x? 'S'.C:/T/IVY·

' /f ~t..-lfe£ /-}£~1\;;J ;3£<::/-J<ASi: ;/ <.()'lJ<.IJ/VF 1.3-£ /JON£ <-fN71l Tri(:.' "it)(/7 ;)fi'tr ri/IJ £X/'tA?.t"'J.

(t!/.{;J ,A/I<Jno,.v IIL:!'I"fA!t/llv· 3 •tr·t<l ,r:;v-. 'li'··n·)

TilE. 'STA-TE 'SC/I..Ivf/T A C.O/'ll'7tNU/I-1ve£ 13£CA<Af£ ();C' Trl~-: Ur•J,4V/#(-"J/JI(J /'7 ((),.C A vvtr.N£f.f,

(t,9./) 771£ T/2/I'IL C..VUA?.T 'rt-fE./1/ 5t.JCr-vcST.C/) /Of'< 7#£ ST.&T[ 7V MoV£ /'C);<? .d/5/1-?IJ'J'·<lC <J~ ro.-«:

r/"1£ WA'i:HINv-7\.JN <C.<.,;IVSTt7U71<)/I.l ;J!'.!OVt/J£<; tAl o"'-'<17<-L£ I SJf.<.TivAI 10 71'1.4-T:

•' Jt.JSTI(,( mt ALL C..~S£S )'f/A·C.L /.3.c· 4t)MmltST£~.C.!j IO,&.tL...Vt.'1, ,4/V/.} vvt'T/-/(;UT

LINN£.<:.€S'S,o<JI0, t'X"Lr~ •: (tt.k'I~/'IASI)" .4ot.>£O)

el/t:K!'-1 ~RI/1//t/1114-L /-',t/LC;t££1J/nlo--. 771£..., S!IALL (j£ ~OI'VSn?UI~I.) /(> s.t.<:..t.A~£ Stk;CJZ/Or'7

11\/ ~~v~t)<.A1<?,.(1 F./.li~N.C!iS t"'l/ AIJI'Ut/1/15 r~.4776N, t:::I"'/'Lc..r;v.e· .JvtS 7/t:.C .41VQ 7//.C .C'-IN~tA/1'91'10tV

of= wvJUS'Td·!AdU( £,x;CJhVr.< ,4,-,11) t)6L4'1.:,

1-4/£::./U:., T/-1£. 7'1<119( -~O'l.IA!r iJ,c_;,tlc:t) TI-llE .STi4T£r 1'//0TIO.-v· 7"<-J <!.Q,-v/1/1/U.C: Ar.I/J

A"-.KNowL£t.)v£.h Tr/£ /k?j!10n1/'I;V<:.£ o/- i4 TIN!Lt..._, 7X?I/l( A-t,lt1 /t•/1'1-t rVI.r<'· (r,-<;7/evv77-C"i·

":>/)££/)'? "T;(!/Al.- ~LO<:..k VI/AS' AL-A'IOS'T U,tCJ. /<Nt.Jvv,---v<.-- 7/-IIS1

1-H,£ .C..C/L.IPtZT t-ra/)/i!.<:)_r-7£~~"7

S'-4<i-O-£S7£il Tf/,-4'7 rHif£ 'Sli4Tc /t?~V£ ,.:()1'< I)!SIZ--t/S.rFJC. C~ r"ICI..E--1S"t.::_ 7/Vt( o.C:/.c'/Vd/2;,/T,

7HI'i ~0Ni"/'?AVI21'1£f IT! f?/ll'(/)e 1..)1{}(/'f/()N'· TO iJ£/1/'f ?W.C 5?/>9-?Z'f' M<JTI<)A/ T() <t.<J;V/7""'1b/C..

rT W;</5 TfftC 77?/..4 L t::_rn-tn_7 S iJu T'7 rt> .61/fU-"<.,.C. A :s~£-ff/Jy 7;/(?/.4-C '-'"'ltJ.£-'? <:.//\' 3. :'J.

t-1£. ,At.Jv A-xz<ru~s TN/1-r r!l<::,-e£ e-vr<~S' rvv G--o'Ob <:.J""lus.c To c:cvv77,.,-,tlvf.C <rlv.t:....v ely

'7#.( C(il.4xZ.T t01'1/ M4?e<u'l 17, <e.otf/, wrltc.fl tS t::SS£/V·TJ/I<..Ly ~6CJu,-~£d /1'7 /He /.?f../U ..Sc/.ok'.c

.4 "-<ON7t/VU.4/l/C...C. e._P1V ~.€ (j-A?/lAr7£J, ,M/1?. 0>"1·/er71.,.,r7/.i!/ OI:.3.J£C.7£/.) T() ,.4LL '-O'li'71AI'M-4/V(_Lj'

Aril..l M4t)£ cLc/1-il'<? ·ro 71-/.<!'.' <:.t.:/t.f/e'T Til/I-T /'1.£ l"llZP-v/.l£1} TO £X"cA?C.ts.<i ;'//f 5,-&'.C.C:o':;. /7{!'.1.4{

X! I \1-f! TJ .

13/l..CA-us~ Tfl£. <::.(IU(~./ A/!1'---ts.(.i) t1'5 OtJCJ<?-<::.no,,.,l 1AI c.o<J"';T//V'IJMt(r 7ri.C: C/'1.J'L Wt7#{}-U.r

6~o;J ~IHA'i.C ;4-Ni) !I'll v't~UI--1/0N or 77-1£ WA'SII• ~01"\!SJ; A/flT. I w:.'-TI'i..·,Y I<:J t:J'-1 rUI"ZTf>IL~

Dk..L-4'-1;;1./<t- Tli£ ;JA-<or:..t:.tDlNvCr-':1 11-Jt r <:..r:/1.-t/~T -sf!r:_,uz.tJ <r~;d"f?- /Zt:::vtt:: vv ore t)ts/1--?tfr 71'/..f' <!

<::(l'l.ANrJ • Til£ C(/'Vf~T or" A,d/?~ &(f £Atfe A.

i'!>S<.A£ 3; Mte· Q,,q.-,t?,.fi'l..A7T£'S Mvrl'i?zM.-1-'TlOrl IS l•"\l"51.4rrtC/£/'1/r c..-t' !-f/S t'S/1-/(. J'-111--t;J/,vr;...

<:: •. t/1'17<2.(1-£ ,jt.:,'tA--c..a£ rT /-Atl • .'r TV <:..o,vlr;L/AI .#(..L 71-1£ £S.Si."rV7//l t. .c:u:.vt£N/s oF 1!'"/C: <:..t~tM.<:.~

1," Vtr:JL-"1-Tt'VAI of ;-/IS "S/ xTfl A-NI) Fuu..eTC.£rvTI-I /J.MLNt.JArt£niT 4.ttr/4T TO Til£ Llf· f. ~ONSi·

.1rvtl m£ vvASI-I- ~o ... vs7- A.r:e7. I s/!.<:::7'/vr'' 3 .-4-rv/) ~<·

AAI tNF-Ifl'?MA--7/C..N /VIUJr <::._OAIT-41/V .ALL £SS£1VT/,4L £L£.tV16/VTS o/-1' "' <:!J~!M<.:t;, S/A7!( v-.

C:-~/£.£;'\1, !01 wn·-""/-'/1· 3SS" (:woo) ('f<AOTTN(r S/rrT.C v. KJ<"JI('SVII<, tl7 w-n.w 73, '17 (19<)1). 1At

/3.,4/L JL.lM,f.')JNv 1 rt-f£ i-INO.CX?LytNv' <J!-FeNf"£ !!i .-7/tl £'S$'.C;vTIA( ,£i...c/vu-;,.y;r OF- T.I'/.C: <:,.IE'//'VI~.ft_/.)

'1r/li. t<'AT1<.NV4L£ /3£:./ltll.tiJ "v<!.LubiNC.~ "t::sSJ!:JVTtAL .c'U:M.c·,-vn'' i'<>"~TI-I.CA? 7'XI//-.N <>.vt...., 's71"'J/'(...f7Vre'1

lf.UMG:NTS 15. 7<:J (:riVE Tilt: A>::.<:.'-4'S£l) p/lo~l[/l N<:JTI".fi a/:: Tr/.( NA7'UI'e£ 01::: T#£ C/ftM£. .

.:s.o Tl.fA'T TH!E. A<::.(.•-.AS.C:t} e.t<J-N fJ!lj£/f4/.!.f .oi/.N .A-iJ£.'9<./Ar£ a.CI'-'£.NS£. KJOJQ'!>VII<', 117 I'Vn· 2t/ 93

TH£ /1V~~M47?CrJ IS' L/1.3.£A?,4L{. '7 <::_R'.JNS'T'A?Ut£.1) ltV F4-VU'J'l <..)1:: tTS V/!t:..JIJ/7 '1· t<J 0~5 1/1~1 117

W/1. cJ .4T 10:1. /.Jt.r t.Vr0"><!M4-710;..t vvll...L /.3£ l...t;.:lllct:..LJ ,;rv A,r.:Jp!L/9-( L.lf\.tO.t!:-4 T;F,.: LHJ.(!~.4(

<:..OP'V r /X!Ut:'/70/1.1 1'<1..1(/<:1

,;C At\/ A/};:Jfi./.?./.[,tVTl. '? MtS'J 1/V(r- £ L/.E/?1.6.-vJ7" A/14-.-; 1.3.C: ;C/fp'('l.. '7 /M,dt.l.€1)

;CII«),I!/J 'Ttl£ .1-t<irl<rL!A(r£. tOt= Tt-l£ <U-1/II'E'(}Y/V(j- t)O(./JIM.C/VT: ,_d. /1-T JOl.f· ,y,t£Ve/!7f.I£LI£Sf1

,;'9

t.J(.U:.~A( /!.tEAorr.tV. c~rvrvor <!..t....t.-z£ -4...v ,r..;f"C()eM47"'/0A.I 7'11/1-/ <:.nt.-v,vo.:r 1.3£ <:.o;vrr,:;>u.C/) ·i"d

O·IV~ AIO'Ttv;_. 01:.. (!);q 7-0 <:!.f(.J"'-17.•'1NV IN ..SOA-·U:. A/l4rV/Vc,(/ T/i£ £s>t./vJ7rJ(. /£L£f'MC.rt/;:r5' <Jr'

A 'fl.(/1-?.<:.'. STk/tC V· C../liVI/)d.CLL1 n.r wn. ec/ 7'/71 '60~ (1'19fj

UA.(/).C#'f VV.II'SHIN(r7\),V L;f.IIA.J1

/0 6.£ C.<OAIVt<:..TE/) 01:" t.3AI( Jt...t~?,rJ/rV(/'.1 /H.£ ;).C:./£'NI.J-4,v/

4//t...IS;- /.3£ <:!H-4-Ie(r£1) IIVIT/-1 A /)A.I'2/I<:...u(r<JJI? UMt.J.C/?LyiN(r. ~,ret/V7£., ST/"17£ V. /}O,d£. /00 ., .... n.

,Af7f'· t.p2tf, (p< 7 (z.ooc.j. <:...~1/<ZT's ~l£VI.C:vv A <::.1//J.Ll...t:.F\1</£ /o TI-M.' '.;t.J/=rt<:J.Crv~'7 <j/' 7//L

<:.IIA-tev·fn/(r oOC..UM.CrVT t.l.t: I'VOVO• '5T/f'l?;C v. <:...-<!JM;'J/.-3£L£., I<J- wn-?d 7??, l;vl (!99r)

i!>t-'1-tt.. -JV..M('Jiro.l& IS t);.:;~/1/1/.t::'/j l"-1 ;i'<:.vv 'J/1. 70,/70, Tf/-c !~LC:M£./1/TJ 01"" /.).4/( Jvi/1--,~1/V'V.

"!-~':?.£ AU£ T ,;: THt:. !)t:./t:./111)4r-lff: i) w.4~ /I.C (I) ;COl'<, ~t/,41'!. v-£() VVt.T~ or.? '0"-/VI(../£.0 <..>;:' /I

;J,.4,r<.rtC.u(,;.J.-,<l 1!../f!f/VI£.; Z) vvr"!S' A'.C.Ur?SLtJ t3'1 ~(/1.../l'fl..T <97'<.t.J.C,r? ol'e AJMt'T?·c.~tJ 70 /)/1-lt. ~,Nt'l"#

77fE.. /U:.<tr--vt,.:?.t,/11.011/ (:)/-A :S<..I1'3S£'?<-I.e:..-v'T· f'C.AroN/-1-C.. ,4.;:J,I1.C~A!'I"h',,..C£; ,-9..-v.d 3) t.CNC/1..-vi....VCrL'-7

rRti.£1) T'-' -1-;:J;0<.:;;)//1 ,'15 t<!ci:)>UIJ/?£/J, 'ST,-9-T£ v. /N;"/.C, /OCJ w,.-1- .. '11;:?,P'· f.t;Z<f, (;,Z 7 (<:<voo)

Mle. G-~V'L/'TTE ,4-l'<?v•CI£. S' Tfi/1-T Tli£. A..z,-J.CIVdetJ tdl'-cvt/VIA-T/Vv' 1'::-;L.C/J 01'1.1 Jr.vv. 2 V, <'.Ol '/

tS ;/VSVrri<:...tL/1/T /.3k_CA<..tf£ /1 .0o£f NOT (.OPV7;'11.-v' At_( Tl'leo £H'c/V77;<J(. £.(..£,/14c'r\17J o/'

Tli£. ~tei/Vl.£ 0~ /.31?-1'- JV!f'l-tr-JIN(--, VI(J/...4 TI/V(r f/-II S1 ><7f/ .;l!Nt} ;t:O<A~/£.£,n/?Y./ /1.4·U£;vJM£,~'1/T

~l(rr/75 7\) TH£ v/.S". ~.oi"VS777'U'T/ON A--..t-!J IIVA·Sf-1. ~oNJ'T. A.l'27; / s£<:...7/CvV 3 r;;v;) <c.

1/V 7/-115 <:...1'9-<;;,€., Tlf.G. AMi.E.rvJC.t) 11"11;::0/(JMA·r/O.,V IN <:..C/Urv7 ~ S:i/9-T£/j :

"<OIV <(J'1(t .413r;n."r rt-l.c. srfi ~~ o;: oc;:.ro..s.c,.e, ·:e.otJ, trl Tr/£ sJ;.'J.-7£ CJI::.

vvfHf/1.-vV:ro ... v, Til£ .. ,4/.:JovE- ;v/IM.CIJ tJI£r;.[l'11d4tv~ r/;<;v;~vc- tJ.C£,~v

IU.Li£.4feO /.3'? <.':.0'\.4;e?- <D/'2d.CA!' OA? A.J.-vi/T/,C/.) IO 1'.3,..,11. I/Vt7l'l KNOW

t.~i)(r£ o;: Tflf: ;eE'fU/,-e,C,V!.(A/7. <J;: /!- S'u/S'S.£CjtU£n/'T t<J.C:;(Sc;N/1-L

A-(1;:7.<!.~19-rlr;:fi. t3£A/)e£ A- C..(/LAI<{7'- ()!= Tl·llf ST/1-7£ o~ (),<" 771~· /t?£'}'U/teC •

,o/li£NT to t<Z£~r ro /1- ~~;:z.e:.~rtCJAI/1-l. ;-::/1-<:.:_tt_tr._, Fo?e s,c~v,r::.£

Jb

M_£ri fd,(IJ, 7'J WIT: (ri'Ui-..VT C:.(/V/At7''J S'-'i/]£;'tlfJ'X' <Z.I/!..4/?..7" <:;./9-f.-fS£ ;\/(;.

1'3-t-o<:JI./co-t~ <C...orvr.-uJ-;(2'1 •;r-o ~£vJS'C.iJ <:..o/Jt£ tQ/ w4SIIo-.r(/70N 'JI'J-7f..no'.'

Tl..f47" ~H141f!(r£1J <i:JN'-'1 13'7 /l..cr£.1(!1(!1/V(r 7"-' THI£ AIUMI$£,tq o/- ,A ~n-...., <OI~Q/-'-'1/~c,c·· DIIJ .-vor·

'SI"/-ifff-''1 i)U£ f'J~'VUSS. ,U.LytN(r 1.4/-)0rv' /-tJOf(!51/lt<~ 7"11£ ~f/t4~7 ~£1'/~~4-7.6"/J ''{Pt.,_)£ 1/kVI!.

t?.£(1£~/T£/)LI '5191/J ll/tfl-7 lJt: .. /£rvr)/91"/7T •:;f/o'ui../J AI07 1-Mf/£ 70 'StE4-I'((t;rl I'~CP<! TH£ I'>?V!L£f' w<

1(_/C.(J-UI...~'lYOAIJ TI-le "1 Al'e£ A"'-C.t-IS.C.O of! Vtol./4-/trv•(r:' !]RooK< ll'i tNt?· <.d 4-l' (eJJ" ('7rc) •

4-S tnt 71-1-IS CA-S£, 'TH,£ S' 7;1-T£ h"'-tUIJ To <!.1-/.4-K!_v£ 7#£ /V.4A1£ o~ 7/I,C ;d""'"e7'1tc,./t,"'f"'?

C::.~/Mk1 j'J<JSS.CS:S/0/-'V o/- A ~Or•t7"'~CJI..U:.tJ SUdS il"lrvC<:C, ( M£.TJI/JA/1/)//,CTA-vlpv£) hiV /1"1£: 1-'1//<:J~-

/I'?~'TI'ON A-'S ;ei:."Jt-lt~£d 1•'11' <t...-e£1:/if wHtc..fl .~V7A--kX. S" n"f'l!. ct-ln.-~OIA/Ct- t!JO'\..,thvt.;.·,.,.fr· ;,.·vsu//

/<:..t£n!T· tt!E~tJ 15 ~£'1Uf';(?c:tJ 70 /JIS'..vt/55 <::..VU/"1./T <- ·

I <:.£-A(T!I-'1 TI'/A-'T ()A.! 77-l;s bt4T£ I ;VWJ..tt...C)) 17/£ FoL.l<:JwtN(j- /)-v0J..-VT6v7(s-)

TO 11/1-1-t~f/ At€£ At=r/J(![./}j1 13y t..J.';. /VI_,AIL; 1a{)s-r;4-(r£. ,c)I(~.C /JA-10 ro:

(J·O· /Sox 1./09-e.."'!

tJL'1AAfJM1 W'A· lfii"P:JI/~o'}'C.~I

r:!_IEr~~/E.J(_ <;;, "1"0WAIS<..L"1

c-__~r <[)/- #f1~t#~A-LJ. ·- o;:..L.C~ K

.APPENDIX

·.·

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHJNGTON IN AND FOR GRAt;JT COUNTY

RENEE CAMPBELL

FILED

I AUG 2 0 ·2013. KIMBERLY A. ALLEN Grant County Clerk

·STAJE OF WASHINGTON, Platntiff, NO. \-3:=J r'O::l '-f 2c c• f

· ·vs. · CRIMINAL CASE SCHEDULING ORDER

.. I'T IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:. . . .. . .. . . 1. 0~ or before the. Omnibus Hearing date, counsel for the State ·~haii .. <Jisclose to cour:~sel for. Defendant all· materials and:. · ··

in(ormation Identified in CrR 4.7(a). On or before said :date, counsel to~ Defendant shall disclose to ·counsel for the Ste,le all materials and Information Identified in CrR. 4.7{b). . · . . . . . · . : . . . ·

2. Motions requiring hearings in.excess of ten minutes per side; ~r. involving live testimony, including hearings under GrR3.5·a~d· · CrR 3.6, shall be flled::or. made orally at. the Omnibus Hear-ing. ~Hearings upon such matte~~ will·be docketed only when requested at the time the motion is filed or made orally.·.. : ·

3.. ·.At.the.Omnibus Hearing, the court may, upon its OW!l:motion or·at the request·Of counsel,·schedule additional. status hearings.or. a Pretrial Conference pursuant to CrR 4.5(c)(v). . · ·

L"fJTf'1·11HeAW 1(') :lT!If? · .. , · : · · . ·4. . At the Omnibus·Hearing; cou11selshal1 ce~lf!i,,\9i!h~,:.,CQlf~·:w(~)!the·status.of.discqvery and compliance with disclosure obligations; · ..

(b) that counsel have conferr~d in good faith to. consider resolution of the. case without trial·, and .(c} that a plea agreement has or .. , will be ~r.qpp,J?eq_, 1 Qrr)'l'ill·nolt beJcqnsidered{,and·the withdra~~Jdate·of any-outstanding settlement pffer·.: ·. ..· · : ·

· !r. .,1,.t1.• . ,,,, t, .. ,,o ., :il~q~Ja !liH ;a -1'•$1 •• ' • . •

5;:. ... ·At- the· Readiness:Hearin<11.·ea?~;:s\~~~~.~~~~~?1~tn~r·c~~f!rm:its re~.dlness.·to p.roceed to ·Trial· or moy!J. for Trial conftnu~nce, lf,Trial:is continuedpthe C?urt'~!)~1!'~!S6 s9~~~~~WS ~..(hflOditionaj· readiness hearing accordi.0gly: • ~··:. ·/' .. ·;.: ;;,,:

~ -·j· -1 • ';j• ,• , 0 ,. .. 0

II' 'I •"1::1 '(IT' m (till .,. ,. , .•. r:· •• , .... · .'6. . Notlce·'i~'De,feilda'nt: ·lf·,Tri<ll,does .not· commence· on· the· date scheduled·, a.nd· a.m!w triai' date i§.n1rexpressly. ordered by the .. ': . · ..

court, ~eadJness • .Hearing{-and: TriaPwJII'b'e' .. 9e'emea ·continfl~d. to the. following ~eek. ·.·D~fendantJ~~all appear the following :. ·, ... · · . . : MondayJ.(,Tuesdayrlf•Mondi;iy:1is ta h611aay) fc\r'Re·adiness.~~earing,. and .. th.e· following: Wednesday .(Thursday· if ·Monday ·is· a::. ..· . ·

hollday)-for-Hial: ---·-. -. ~__....to~~;\)-"'·:·: •. ~. ~··~"''"' ·. t. • ... , • _' :. /

. . . },~!1 ~!::l~~.~ .. '(l\Q(Jifllfi ·r· .. (!q. . .. :.·~· ·, ...

DONE IN OPEN.'COU.RT . .. ·. · :. .. :....::~-·~a.~-~:~: .:· · · · ... ......,· -----'--~-. . . __,...-.. -. ~·--·. . . .~w9·:'1UOI..>{~. JLJD . . ·. . , ... ·

:. Receipt.of.:Gopy ... acknowleagedby·.~~'fendi! .., .. -..::--'1i"i>""'--=-t-~l£C.·=-~~· c:..r;....~k----'---:-~-1.:: ·~·~ ./td)A ~·~~·-~-~ .:

ZfliJ JUL - 3 P 2: I 8

l\lf1BEHLY 1\. ALLEN GH!-\NT COUNTY CLERr\

HOLLY HINTZ

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR GRANT COUNTY

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff, No. l 3 - 1 - Q 0 4 2 0 - 1 vs. INFORMATION

MATTHEW SIMON GAROUTTE,

Defendant.

D ANGUS LEE, Prosecuting Attorney for Grant County, State of Washington, by this '

Information accuses the above-named defendant of the crimes of:

Count 1: Possession of Methamphetamine, 69.50.4013

Committed as follows:

COUNT 1: Possession of a Controlled Substance !Methamphetamine!

On or about the 3rd day of April, 2013, in the County of Grant, State of Washington, the

above-named Defendant did possess a controlled substance, to-wit: Methamphetamine, including

its salts, [somers, and salts ofisomers; contrary to the Revised Code ofWashington 69.50.4013

and 69.50.206(d)(2).

(MAXIMUM PENALTY-Five (5) years imprisonment and/or a fine of not less than $1,000 nor more

than $10,000 fine pursuant to RCW 69.50.40 13(2) and RCW 69.50.430, plus restitution and

assessments.)

(lfthe Defendant has a second or subsequent conviction under RCW 69j0.401, .4011, .4012,

.4013, .4015, .402, .403, .406, .407, .410, or .415, the minimum fine shall be $2,000 pursuant to

RCW 69.50.430.)

JIS Code: 69.50.4013 ·Cant Subs No Prescription~ Felony

contrary to form of the Statute in such cases made and provided, and against the peace and

dignity of the State of Washington.

DATED at Ephrata, Washington, Tuesday, July 2, 2013.

NAME: MATTHEW SIMON GAROUTTE

D. ANGUS LEE

::M;g~ Edw~ 6wens, WSBA #29387 Chief Deputy Prosecuting Attorney

DOB: 03/25/1984

ADDRESS: 322 1ST AVE SE, SOAP LAKE, WA 989851

OlN: 13EP1267 AGENCY: EPD

SID: WA17684076 FBI: 241796TB0

SEX: M RACE: l

DRJV. LIC. NO. GAROUMS167DS PCN:

DLST: WA

DOC:.

SObJJA BLACl< ~ 'FILED

JAN 2 8 2014 KIMBERLY A. ALLEN

GRANT COUnTY CLERK

~~~~~\l\\\\l\~\~\l\l \~\\\\~,\\\~1\i 07-720493

SUPERIOR COURT OF W ASHlNGTON FOR GRANT COUNTY


Plaintiff,

vs.

MATTHEW SIMON GAROUTTE, EPD, 13EP1267

Defendant.

No. 13~1~00420-1

AMENDED INFORMATION

D. ANGUS LEE, Prosecuting Attorney for Grant County, State of Washington, by this Amended Information accuses:

MATTHEW SiMON GAROU"n'E of the crime(s) of

Count 1: Possession of Methamphetamine, 69.50.4013 Count 2: Bail ,Jumping (From Class B or C Felony), 9A.76.170(3)(c)

committed as follows:

CQUNT 1: Possession of a Controlled Substance [Methamphetamine!

On or about the 3rd day of April, 2013, in the State of Washington, the above-named Defendant did possess a controlled substance, to-wit: Methamphetamine, including its salts, isomers, and salts of isomers; contrary to the Revised Code of Washington 69.5 0.4013 and 69 .50.206( d)(2). (MAXIMUM PENALTY-Five (5) years imprisonment and/or a fine of not less than $1,000 nor more than $10,000 fine pursuant to RCW 69.50.4013(2) and RCW 69.50.430, plus restitution and assessments.)

(If the Defendant has a second or subsequent conviction under RCW 69.50.401, .4011, .4012, .4013, .4015, .402, .403, .406, .407, .410, or .415, the minimum fine shall be $2,000 pursuantto RCW 69.50.430.)

JIS Code: 69.50.4013 Cant Subs No Prescription-Felony

I' . . \ ' ; :· .~ "' . ' • ·. ! .

COUNT 2: Bail ,Jumping

On or about the 8th day of October, 2013, in the State of Washington, the above~named Defendant, having been released by court order or admitted to bail with knowledge of the requirement of a subsequent personal appearance before a court of this state or of the requirement to report to a correctional facility for service of sentence, did fail to appear or did fail to sunender for service of sentence in which a Class B or Class C felony has been filed, towit: Grant County Superior Court Cause No. 13-1-00420-1; contrary to Revised Code of Washington 9A.76.170. (MAXIMUM PENALTY (Failure to appear in Class B or Class C felony case)-Five (5) years imprisonment and/or a $10,000 fine pursuant to RCW 9A.76.170 and RCW 9A.20.02l(l)(c), plus restitution and assessments.)

JIS Code: 9A.76.170.3C Bail Jump B or C Felony

contrary to the form of the Statute in such cases made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State of Washington. ·

DATED at Ephrata, Washington,

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR GRANT COUNTY

STATE OF WASHINGTON, Plaintiff,

vs.

) ) )

., .

NO. J :~)·~ / .. i)f') L~/ .. z -t.) .• /

~~ / ) '. ~~ :( ;' .It

11_. • , · ,...r,i_. !,',~.,fl.·!. • ... ~ { ·~~· :/ ·~ J'r- -.l • l6.4 tA"i )

CRIMINAL CASE SCHEDULING ORDER __,_. _,_,__.__~:.....,.· """"""-''-'" __

0"--' .. ;c...:tc:...''...c.' -"'i.c....;l '=-·· _,_(: ""'. ,:...;, .. ,. _____ ,

Defendant. ) ----------------------------------~--------------------------------------------------------------;1::;:'-~-----:::-----~~--------------~---;-:-:,~r:.---~;--------------------~~-------

PROS'R: f"" , . .t , J\.~ .. :;;t" '··"· DEF R: ,~ «> 4. r ~.> ·· ;· 1)1'/<1'!" LANG. · lio\ ...• /-, 't~ .. ,.. _ -~"·· _ ~ 2 I . I"/ '·~··' -.,. ·;~ .~.J

CrR 3.3 COMMENC'MT DATE: .J51ll-"".,.,t_,~-!.-J..-t TRIAL DEADLINE: /-~--"?.J:-....,."'·'f .·.· · ,;: '1 · I ··)

OMNIBUS HRG . .1 · : t ·· f"-· READINESS ".;') .. (1· p ... , TRIAL .. (,1 · l"'"} -$ --· , ~

**Defendant must attend Omnibus Hearing, Readiness Hearing, and Trial, each set at 9:00a.m. **

IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. On or before the Omnibus Hearing date, counsel for the State shall disclose to counsel for Defendant all materials and

information identified in CrR 4.7(a). On or before said date, counsel for Defendant shall disclose to counsel for the State all materials and information identified in CrR 4.7(b).

2. Motions requiring hearings in excess of ten minutes per side, or involving live testimony, including hearings under CrR 3.5 and CrR 3.6, shall be filed or made orally at the Omnibus Hearing. Hearings upon such matters will be docketed only when requested at the time the motion is filed or made orally.

3. At the Omnibus Hearing, the court may, upon its own motion or at the request of counsel, schedule additional status hearings or a Pretrial Conference pursuant to CrR 4.5(c)(v).

4. At the Omnibus Hearing, counsel shall. certify to the court: (a) the status of discovery and compliance with disclosure obligations; (b) that counsel have conferred in good faith to consider resolution of the case without trial; and (c) that a plea agreement has or will be proposed, or will not be considered, and the withdrawal date of any outstanding settlement offer.

.,

5. At the Readiness Hearing, each side will either confirm its readiness to proceed to Trial or move for Trial continuance. If Trial is continued, the court shall also schedule an additional readiness hearing accordingly.

6. Notice to Defendant: If Trial does not commence on the date scheduled, and a new trial date is not expressly ordered by the court, Readiness Hearing and Trial will be deemed continued to the following week. Defendant shall appear the following Monday (Tuesday if Monday is a holiday) for Readiness Hearing, and the following Wednesday (Thursday if Monday is a holiday) for Trial. /) /·""' ... 1 •

. /.,, ,.. t/1 '1 .Sf;, ~/ . . i

DONE IN OPEN COURT I/.(:::: / I"T .. / c ·>•"-t::l4·1· ( /' , "!J~···t.ltii·t / I . -j U_D_G_E __ =-.:.--'---'~---"''-'""-;/'-"--'-~-"-----

( Receipt of copy acknowledged by Defendant: ----,-·"--~/_· ----'---~---'-----'-----------

..,., .....

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR GRANT COUNTY


Plaintiff, ORDER ON OMNIBUS HEARING

vs. Deadline: /'1

A

t\./. c .. / '? t"1~·. "'> Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) Trial Date:

.~"\ ..

An omnibus hearing was held on this date. It is noted and ordered as follows: f"~-e,/ '\; .; ···· : 7 1

<; 1. CrR 3.5: o No custodial statements will be offered in state's case-in-chief/or in rebuttal.

o Defendant's statements will be offered, if at all, only in rebuttal. o Statements referred to in state's discovery will be offered, and:

o By stipulation of the parties, may be admitted without pretrial hearing. ·_,o A CrR 3.5 hearing shall be held: · , ~ .:\ ~ .. , , . (date/time)

2. CrR 3.6: o "' No motion to suppress physical evidence or identification shall be made. \(O Defendant will move to suppress evidence, and shall comply with CrR 3.6, CrR 8.1,

and CR 6. A CrR 3.6 hearing shall be held: · . ' ~ '··· (date/time) 3. CrR 4.7: Plaintife,<o has provided the defense all discovery required by CrR 4.7(a).

o shall provide the defense with the following by---------------- (date):

Defendant;•,,eJ has provided the plaintiff all discovery required by CrR 4. 7(b ). y,[j shall nr'ovide plaint~ffwith the following by--:;;:-------,------------- (date):

~· ·'/:_· _ _,._.- .-./ .. :· --~_f_/ ... :~. { I .f ,?"_f;; -t //\_, ~ :._~ .. II ( _b./

4. Defense: Defendant has stated the general nature of the defense to be as follows: :.tP General denial; o Alibi; o Self-defense; o Consent; o Insanity; o Diminished capacity;; .. o Other;:,#,. . 1.. y ".i '·. . . ·· ·'.

5. Other: o A Ryan (child hearsay) hearing shall be set by the Court Administrator. ' · o Other hearings to be set by Court Administrator: ____________ _ o Plaintiff intends to move to amend the Information.

vo Other motions intended to be brought{ , , . r , . t ./ . ·ul. . i \ 1' , u Motions, inciuding those not specifically referenced herein, shall comply with CrR 8.1, CrR 8.2, CR 6, and CR 7(b) unless expressly agreed by the parties in writing.

6. Other ol'ders:

.,.,,

DONE rN OPEN COURT: , · '·· '/ · 1 I ----~----------

\

JUDGE

Approved as to form: ·

Attorney for Plaintiff ........

'·Attorney' for Defendant,",..~'

Copy received by Defendan},: -----------------~--------------------;·


STATE OF WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, NO.

CRIMINAL CASE SCHEDULING ORDER

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~---------------------------------------------------------------------------~ . . . "l"') ;f· PROS'R: I ""': .. ,d ()M'.I' .• ~.;';,. DEF'R: ("::7 <. l l ~ . C;;:j."l.!/ti LANG. A'' \ ..... ·)

CrR 3.3 COMMENC'MT DATE: ., · . r • t:' TRIAL DEADLINE: L;! · 2 ~:i ... 1 1'"1

OMNIBUS HRG. READINESS .5' ... 1 t .. ; •• i 11 TRIAL 3- ::2-6, -; 4.._, ·--'----

**Defendant must attend Omnibus Hearing, Readiness Hearing, and Trial, each set at 9:00a.m. **


information identified in CrR 4.7(a). On or before said date, counsel for Defendant shall disclose to counsel for the State all materials and information identified in CrR 4.7(b).

2. Motions requiring hearings in excess of ten minutes per side, or involving live testimony, including hearings under CrR 3.5 and CrR 3.6, shall be filed or made orally at the Omnibus Hearing. Hearings upon such matters will be docketed only when requested at the time the motion is filed or made orally.


4. At the Omnibus Hearing,· counsel shall certify to the court: (a) the status of discovery and compliance with disclosure obligations; (b) that counsel have conferred in good faith to consider resolution of the case without trial; and (c) that a plea agreement has or will be proposed, or will not be considered, and the withdrawal date of any outstanding settlement offer.


6. Notice to Defendant: If Trial does not commence on the date scheduled, and a new trial date is not expressly ordered by the court, Readiness Hearing and Trial will be deemed continued to the following week. Defendant shall appear the following Monday (Tuesday if Monday is a holiday) for Readiness Hearing, and the following Wednesday (Thursday if Monday is a holiday) for Trial. -~7 /

.. DONE IN OPEN COURT .~:; · /7 • ·:~~ N/ . . --i~~f~.Jt'!£:,~···1

JUDGE /

Receipt of copy acknowledged by Defenda?(~)7,"_ .. ,-'-,.F-'£.·""/lt-' _..:.1"4.J~r.:._/...r,.t"-(----'""'r..='t'--l ---"''",~""'.f<::-', .. tw:.''l'=''--'·'f'-· _______ _

·t r7-- J ~..., , .......

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF GRANT


Plaintiff,

vs.

Matthew s. Garoutte ,

Defendant,

) Case No.: 13-1-00420-1 ) ) Motion to Dismiss ) Re: Count 2 Bail Jumping ) ) )

COMES NOW the defendant by and through their attorney the Grant County Public

Defense , Stephen Kozer, staff attorney , and respectfully moves this Court for an Order

dismissing Count 2 Bail Jumping in the Amended Information pursuant to CrR 8.3 ( b) .

Motion

.The Defendant was charged with Bail Jumping in the Amended Information on or about

January 28,2014.

This allegation was based upon the Defendant not appearing before the Court on October

8, 2013 .

The State waited to provide discovery on the Bail Jumping charge until March 13,2014.

As of that date the State provided :

1) Several new witness lists , amended and second amended witness lists

2) A CD purportedly of the court hearing , but defense counsel cannot open it ;

3) Clerks Minutes;

4) Defendant's booking photo from January 2014;

1

5) Defendant's booking photo from August 2013 ;

6) Copy of the Information;

7) Copy of the Trial Scheduling Order; (with defense counsel signature!, so is defense

counsel now a witness ? The Defense would move to exclude such order) ;

8) Copy of Amended Information;

9) Order Setting Conditions of Release dated Aug 23,2013 ( 2 different ones)

1 0) More Clerks Minutes;

11) Bench Warrant and Order for Bench Warrant

Certainly the Amended and Second Amended Witness list adds new witnesses (

without a summary of the substance of their statements as required by CrR 4.7) and

thus new information that the defense has to manage . Additionally , a copy of the CD

that purports to be the hearing of August 20,2013 is brand new to the defense also,

and would likely change the strategy at trial .

All of this was supplied knowing that the case was going to be called ready for trial

on March 17, 2014, the trial date is March 19, 2014, and that the "Outside date" is

March 24, 2014 ! Clearly the State, having Amended the Information had this

material because the State has the obligation not to file a charge it knows it does not

have probable cause for under RPC 3.8 Special Duties of the Prosecutor .

Defense counsel would acknowledge that we are using the trial set Order dated

Janua.rY 28, 2014 . However it was the State's motion to Amend the Information and

go forward with these dates .

To wait till the eve oftrial is unconscionable . At this point it places the defendant in

the "Hobson's Choice" position of going to trial with ineffective assistance of

counsel or waiving his right to speedy trial . The defendant is prejudiced in having to

make this choice between the denial of a constitutional right and having a speedy

2

trial. The Defendant will not waive speedy trial and Defense counsel will not move

for a continuance.

In St.v. Brooks, 149 Wn. App. 373 (2009), the State provided a stack of discovery

including a 60 page transcript of the victim's statement provided on the night of the

incident the day before trial . The Defendant was in custody and up against the speedy

trial clock. The trial court dismissed the case and was upheld on appeal. The Court

of Appeals noted that the State did not ask the trial comt to consider other

alternatives besides a continuance and that the trial did not abuse ifs discretion when

dismissing the case with prejudice.

In Brooks, the State claimed it did not have control of the late discovery because

it was in control of the police. The CoUrt of Appeals scoffed at that notion.

The Court of Appeals reasoned that this was governmental mismanagement and

required dismissal for arbitrary action or governmental misconduct and noted that

even though the sheriff's office had control of the missing or tardy discovery between

the date of the incident and the date of transcription, and the additional writing of

police reports, the prosecutor failed to work with the sheriff to resolve the time lag!

As the law holds governmental mismanagement does not have to be evil or dishonest

, simple mismanagement is sufficient under CrR 8.3 (b) . St.v. Dailey, 93 Wn. 2d

454, 457 ( 1980) cited with approval in St.v. Brooks, Id.

The Defense respectfully requests that the Count 2 of the Amended Information,

Bail Jumping be dismissed with prejudice . There is no abuse of discretion when a

trial court makes a decision on tenable grounds or tenable reasons. St.v.Blackwell ,

120 Wn. 2d 822 ( 1993). In the case at bar, all of the information was readily

available to the State . All of it was located within the courthouse . There was no

reason for such a lengthy delay in gathering it and forwarding it on to defense counsel

. And as to the Possession of Methamphetamine charge in Count 1 ; there is no

reason why the State has not complied with the rules of discovery by adding to the

3

Dated:

witness list additional witnesses and providing a summary of the substance of their

anticipated testimony. Nothing has been provided. No report from Officer

Wentworth. No report from Officer Froeweiss, No report from CCO Adrade. No

,summary of any other witness on the Possession ofMethamphetamine charge and

' certainly NO summary of anticipated testimony of any witness on the Bail Jumping

charge . . ,, ..

Is the defense purposely and continually jammed up that it has to seek a continuance?

As we have seen so often on the calendar this phenomenon of late discovery and the

old excuse that the police have it and State has not received it yet.

The Defense respectfully moves for dismissal of the Bail Jumping charge under

the principles stated in Brooks,Id

blic Defense staff attorney #14413

4

·, ',

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll\llll 07-740947

SUPERJOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF GRANT


Plaintiff,

vs.

Matthew Garoutte ,

Defendant.

) Case No.: 13-1-00420-1 ) ) Memorialization of Defense Objection on ) March 17, 2014 ) ) Re: Denial of Time for Trial )


Defense , Stephen Kozer, staff attorney , and respectfully memorializes the Defense Oral

Objection on March 17, 2014 and I or the Defendant's ProSe Oral Objection to the State and I

or the Court allowing the State to release the In Custody defendant, so as to extend or otherwise

push into the future the Defendant's time for trial deadline.

Background

The State had originally filed a.-Possession of Methamphetamine charged against the

Defendant. The Defendant had missed a court hearing and a warrant for the Defendant's arrest

was issued by the Court .

The Defendant was arrested on the warrant on or about January 28, 2014 and the State

moved to amend the Information to include Bail Jumping on or about that date.

That the case as amended, was set for was set for Trial Readiness Hearing of March 17,

2014, Trial on March 19,2014, and an· outside or end of time for trial period of March 24,

2014.

- l Grant County Public Defense PO Box 37/238 W. Division St.

Ephrata, W A 98823 (509) 754~6027/Fax: (509)754-6027

On or about January 28, 2014 the State also argued for and had bail set on this case. The

Defendant is Without financial means to post bail. : \'

The m;fendant was also being held on a new charge of Possession with Intent to Deliver

tmde~ another cause # in Grant County.

On March 13, 2014 the State finally provided after approximately 40 days discovery on

the Bail Jumping case. The State also provided 3 amended witness lists on the above entitled

case.

Th~t the Defense worked all day Sunday March 16, 2014 to prepare for the new charge

ofBail.Jumping:

On March 17,2014 the Defense called the case "ready for trial" (aside from the eye

doctor appointment). The State made some excuse about readiness for trial. That the Judge

ruled that the case was goirig out to trial on March 19, 2014 .

OnMarch 17, 2014 after the Defendant was taken down into the jail the State informed

the D~fe~e that ( and this was new ) the State key witness Officer Harvey would be out of

country, the State's representative stati.Ilg he just learned of this. (Ironically the Officer had

just testified in a 3.6 Hearing with the defense and the same State's representative the

Wednesday before and made no mention of himself being out of country" on another case

involving the defendant ) .

On March 17, 2014, the State had the Defendant brought back up from the jail and had

the case recalled before the Court . The State explained to the Court that it's witness would be

out of country and just learned of this. It is unclear if the Court or the State suggested that the

Defendant be released on the charge , but it was suggested and not by the defense . It was

Objected to. the Defendant was released on the charge and the case was continued for trial.·

TIME FOR TRJAL RULE

That the above procedure of releasing the defendant 1 week before the time for trial

rule expired , was done to thwart the defendant's right to a timely trial while incarcerated. It is

the "spirit " of the rule to have both sides prepared for trial in a timely manner or otherwise

extend to the court the courtesy of a 11heads up" that a continuance is needed.

- 2 Grant County Public Defense PO Box 37/238 W. Division St.

Ephrata, W A 98823 (509) 754~6027/Fax: (509)754-6027

The State was not prepared for trial . The State waited almost 40 days to give the

Defense the discovery (most of which was located in the courthouse ) on the Bail Jmnping

charge, most likely in the hopes ( and we have seen from past practice of making it necessary for

the defense to request a continuance . The defense was ready for trial having worked on the case

a good part of the weekend. The defense was not asking for a continuance. The State had not

asked for a continuance. It had been suggested the defendant be released on the charge.

The State had originally asked for bond when it suited there purposes and the State's

purpose was to keep the defendant incarcerated, especially after the State had amended the

Information to add the Bail Jumping charge. Now with the State not prepared for trial (it seems

plausible that the State anticipated a defense motion for continuance after dumping all of the

discovery on the Bail Jumping charge on the Defense March 13,2014, for a "Readiness"

calendar March 17,2014), the State requested no bond in the matter. (The State also knowing

full well that the defendant was held on another case number and thus would not be released. )

The State doing so only to not have the case dismissed for time of trial rule violation.

This was not the intent of the rule .

Conclusion

The defendant position is that the case should have been dismissed . Thwarting to the

time for trial rule when the State is not prepared within the 60 days as required of the defendant

is not the "administration of justice"

Dated:

-3

/h L:pectfully Submitted,

Grant County Public Defense PO Box 37/238 W. Division St.

Ephrata, W A 98823 (509) 754-6027/Fax: (509)754-6027

• 0

- 4

~ }i'l·i~ Grant County' Public Defense Stephen J. Kozer #14413 Attorney for Defendant


Ephrata, W A 98823 (509) 754-6027/Fax: (509)754-6027

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR GRANT COUNTY CRIMINAL MINUTE SHEET

CLERK: M. WEBB DATE FILED: MARCH 24, 2014 ·JUDGE: EVAN E. SPERLINE

CAUSE NO: 13"1..00420-1 REPORTER: RECORDED PLTF ATTY: 0 R. VALAAS

DEF ATTY: · 0 ------STATEOFWASHINGTON ·

VS

0 jY.McCRAE · fE:rE. OWENS D c. HIGHLAND 0 E.ABRAMSON

MATTHEWs. GAR E D T. HILL

·o ~ONZALES ~. KOZER 0 A. CABRERA

. 0 M.MORGAN

0 B.GWINN D D. BUSTAMANTE D R:KENTNER D s. OGLEBAY.

DEF PRESENT: D NO D P. SCHAFF 0 FINANCIAL COLLECTOR, SAI\!DRA JONES

D . ~·3{) YJg ~~~!~~!:=~================PRELI;I~cg~~E~~~g~~1~R~~~1MENT~======~~~e~~r;~=r;:;,;;:;:;~=- ...

E~~::.%~!:DEDTO DEFENDANT · :::~ ~·€~~L rr~mlll!ll~ll~lllll~llll~~~~ · COUNSEL: . -- . 07-739738 __ . _· 'APPOINTED COUNSEL ', ADVICE OF RIGHTS FILED/SIGNED' . --· - . __ ORDER APPOINTING ATTORNEY SIGNED . --INDIGENCE REPORT FILEDlSIGNED --· WAIVED COUNSEL . NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FILED __ RETAINED COUNSEL PROBABLE CAUSE: ORDER SeTTING CONDiTIONS OF RELEASE SIGNED __ PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED --RELEASED ON PERSONAL RECOGNIZANCE __ PROBABLE CAUSE STATEMENT MADE BY --PR BOND$..._.~------

S&T -SIGNATURES REQUIRED OF __ 0-RD_E_R"""F~IN-D-IN-G"""P,....R-0-BAB_L.....:E...,.C-AUSe SIGNED --BENCH WARRANT ORDERED----~-----· _ .. -BAIL SET$ . ORDER FORFEITING BOND/BAIL ENTERED. ============~===========================PLEA ENTRY================================~==========~·

NOT GUll TY PLEA ENTERED PLEA AGREEMENT APPROVED . . -,-PLEA ACCEPTED OF NOT GUILTY --.-PROBABLE CAUSE STATEM.ENT ADOPTED BY PLTFlDEF --INITIAL ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE ENTERED -ORDER AMENDING' INFORMATION SIGNED

AMENDED 0RDE.R SETTING SCHEDULE ENTERED . AMEND.ED.INFORMATION FILED __ . _ORDER ON OMNIBUS HEARING __ 'PSI ORDER SIGNED __ DEFENDANT SIGNS STMT OF DEF ON PLEA OF GUlL TY __ SENTENCING DAtE ORDER SIGNED _DEFENDANT ADVISED OF GUILTY PLEA RIGHTS __ GUlL TV PLEA ENTERED DEFENDANT ADMITS/DENIES VIOLATION __ GUlL TY PLEA AcCEPTED . ORDER ON REVIEW OF COMPLIANCE __ COURT SIGNS STMT OF DEF ON PLEA OF GUlL TY __ ORDER ON COMMUNITY SUPERVISION VIOLATIONS SIGNED ========================================SENTENCING===========================================~=~

__ . _O~DER OF RESTITUTION ENTERE~

CONTINUED TO: FOR: --------------------------~----

PLMHRG ARRAIGN . 8 GPOH GPSH SNTHRG SCVHRG RVWHRG DSMHRG HSlKJC HSTKPA HStKSll'

NCHRG ARGPSH ARGPOH OMNHRG PTMHRG ' FNRHRG . NGPH.. OTHER:_· --------

PROCESSED BY: ___ RENEE __ OAM_P_B_EU. ___ _

... --·.

~.

i

-· ..... ~-: ---- ... '·

· ... · .\ .·

...... --~----:.-1+-----...;;_--..;;...-.:.....:---:-_,.;,-----.:...--------------_;;..--.:..-__;o.,..-.._.___

·1,'

,_,...

-.

. . /

.J

IIIII/I 11111111111111111111 IIIII II I If IIIII 1111111111111 07-744932 .

FILED

MAR 2 5 2014

KIMeERLY A. Al,lt;N

CilRANi COUNTY CLERK

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR GRANT COUNTY HOlt Y HINTZ

vs.

('(hl&it!tf;) >~ &tr?Vrfk_

Defendant( s ).

) ) ) ) )

~ ~; ) )

I. BASIS

No. ) )--/ ·• Dt/"I'J.o ··-1

. ORDER

{VI~ .. ~~~ ()isfY\ts~ u. l ~ f</ Ct It 1f. ~

On 3 ~ :>.lJ w J '1 ·1k.- ,Qe.f<::W.vJ·)': moved the court for: Oi.o o( ~ot.r ~ ~·S.,Il-\ S .:tw..l ~ C.}." '&;j r)~··~j f<r t:r KL cf. '3{&) .hie... nf J.t,.)e,_ LtiStc· •'-t!ay t:lN!. \4•-kr \* \.V)~.'). \1'2ts.

II. FINDING After reviewing the case record to date, and the basis for the motion, the court finds that:

I 1\\1\\ \\Ill 1\\111\\11 1\\l\ \\Ill\~\ \\Ill 1\111 l\11 \l\1 07-739890

RI:NEE CAMPBELl

FILED MAR 3 1 2014

KIMBERLY A. ALLEN GRANT COUNTY CLERK


STATE OF WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, ) ) )

NO. ( J -I ~ ()O t.f J..v--7 vs. at$. A-WL6~1>6-b --~M-~~· _t~j-~t_w ___ b_~_,_o_Q_tt_~ ________ , ~ CRIMINAL CASE SCHEDULING ORDER

Defendant. ) ====================================================================================== PROS'R: 0 Wt. tt., DEF'R: l(" -z 1!. v LANG. ___ _

CrR 3.3 COMMENC'MT DATE: 9 .z_p. 8 TRIAL DEADLINE: tJ I q I ( tj OMNIBUS HRG. READINESS Lt I 7 I r '-{ TRIAL lf I 1 I I'-{

** Defendant must attend Omnibus Hearing, Readiness Hearing, and Trial, each set at 9:00 a.m. **


information identified in CrR 4.7(a). On or before said date, counsel for Defendant shall disclose to counsel for the State all materials and Information identified in erR 4.7(b).

2. Motions requiring hearings in excess of ten minutes per side, or involving live testimony, including hearings under CrR 3.5 and CrR 3.6, shall be .flied or made orally at the Omnibus Hearing. Hearings upon such matters will be docketed only when requested at the time the motion Is filed or made orally.


4. At the Omnibus Hearing, counsel shall certify to the court: (a) the status of discovery and compliance with disclosure obligations; (b) that counsel have conferred.ln good faith to consider resolution of the case without trial; and (c) that a plea agreement has or will be proposed, or will not be considered, and the withdrawal date of any outstanding settlement offer.

5. At the Readiness Hearing, each side will either confirm Its readiness to proceed to Trial or move for Trial continuance. If Trial is continued, the court shall also schedule an additional readiness hearing accordingly.

6. Notice to Defendant: If Trial does not commence on the date scheduled, and a new trial date is not expressly ordered by the court, Readiness Hearing and Trial will be deemed continued to the following week. Defendant shall appear the following Monday (Tuesday if Monday is a holiday) for Readiness Hearing, and the following Wednesday (Thursday if Monday is a

hollday)lorrnar.. _!'!____.:!_0-A 4

: -~ .

DONEINOPENCOURT 8·3{·/':f ~~~ _J,GE

Receipt of copy acknowledged by Defendant: I.,. t~ ~ a.a « f

11111111~11~1111~11 07-739889

RENEE CAMPBEU

FILED MAR 3 1 2014


SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR GRANT COUNTY

@zde_ ~ We;sbn~ laintlff(s), ~

vs.

Defendant(s).

I. BASIS

Jj eft.,~ . moved the court for: Gn ocJe.t U'f\'"'01At"'5 CoAAr!1~~ OJ tt •<A~L r~··. Gc.£~ hc.l!.to;, ~·i"k- ~.sts j:lc;;,~ ~ hr<• d-. CAM a 5Arn buS -Jv rf

II. FINDING After reviewing the case record to date, and the basis for the motion, the court finds that:

f:rooJ. · Cr..,u t«' \ f; C brv 'o • ... -...

Dated: ..3 • 5/ • J'f

c()f.tA &c/IJ 4JJW/J v-o; .. ) ,_ l'i

1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 07-749245

RENEE CAMPBELl

FILED APR 1 4 2014




vs.

Plaintiff, ) ) )

. /" /- ) 'JY)~~ .. ~.fp~·,)

· Defendant. )

NO. I

CRIMINAL CASE SCHEDULING ORDER

====================================================================================== PROS'R~ t2..,.,..s; DEF'R: ()..-(:..f.!) - 1«:>~ LANG. £.a., CrR 3.3 i1ENC'MT DATE: g ... ~·- t '1 TRIAL DEADLINE: (sr ,., ) 3. I ''1 " • 9 ·14 OMNIBUS HRG. ·¥ ~ ·1~ READINESS TRIAL ,, 'I Itt ·~./1./-./'f

**Defendant must attend Omnibus Hearing, Readin s Hearing, and Trial, each set at 9:00a.m. ** s ·12-. 14- ' IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. On or before the Omnibus Hearing date, counsel for the State shall disclose to counsel for Defendant all materials and

Information Identified In CrR 4.7(a). On or before said date, counsel for Defendant shall disclose to counsel for the State all materials and Information Identified in CrR 4.7(b).

2. Motions requiring hearings In excess of ten minutes per side, or involving live testimony, Including hearings under CrR 3.5 and CrR 3.6, shall be filed or made orally at the Omnibus Hearing. Hearings upon such matters will be docketed only when requested at the time the motion Is filed or made orally.

3. At the Omnibus Hearing, the court may, upon Its own motion or at the request of counsel, schedule additional status hearings or a Pretrial Conference pursuant to CrR 4.5(c)(v).

4. At the Omnibus Hearing, counsel shall certify to the court: (a) the status of discovery and compliance with disclosure obligations; (b) that counsel have conferred In good faith to consider resolution of the case without trial; and (c) that a plea agreement has or will be proposed, ·or will not be considered, and the withdrawal date of any outstanding settlement offer.


6. Notice to Defendant: If Trial does not commence on the date scheduled, and a new trial date is not expressly ordered by the court, Readiness Hearing and Trial will be deemed continued to the following week. Defendant shall appear the following Monday (Tuesday if Monday is a holiday) for Readiness Hearing, and the followln Wednesday (Thursday If Monday Is a holiday) for Trial.

DONE IN OPEN COURT q .Jtf ·J'f JUDGE

Receipt of copy acknowledged by Defend~'r--1· ~~~~~i.:s....-.~~~-=~~-=--=...!L.....------~ I ,

1111111 fllllllllllllll/11111111111111111111111111111111 07-752757

C H.) ErO.'"':: r · 1

YES~iA HERR&FI~ I L.

201~ APR - 3 A 8: 3 b

~\lf·18ERLY A. ALLEN GRANT COUNTY CLERK

SUPERtOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF GRANT


Plaintiff,

vs.

Matthew S. Garoutte ,

Defendant,

) Case No.: 13~1~00420~1 ) ) Memorialization of Objection to Trial Date ) ( Continued Objection Placed on Record ) Wednesday April 2, 2014) ) )

COMES NOW the defendant by and through their attomey the Grant County Public

Defense , Stephen Kozer, staff attomey , and respectfully notes this memorialization of the

Defense I Defendant's objection to the trial date placed on the record Wednesday April 2, 2014

on the Call for Trial Calendar.

; I . I. ,__ )._.. L . Dated: ' · f

Presented By:

;/ /

~ --------------~-

'\: •;'i' 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 07-753106



· Plaintiff,

vs.

Matthew Garoutte

Defendant, --~------------

) Case No.: 13-1-00420-1 ) ) Motion to Dismiss for Violation of Time for ) Trial Rule ) ) )


Defense, Stephen Kozer, staff attorney, and respectfully moves this Court for dismissal of the

above entitled matter for violation of time for trial rule .

Background

On January 28,2014 a new trial schedule order was entered .This set the Readiness Hearing for

March 17, 2014.

February 11,2014 Defense counsel requested Omnibus be set over to February 24, 2014.

February 24, 2014 Omnibus was had and 3.5 and 3.6 hearings were set for March 5, 2014.

March 5, 2014 3.5 and 3.6 Motions were continued to March 12, 2014 because the State's

witnesses were not available .

March 12, 20 14 3. 5 hearing is heard by Judge Knodell .

March 17 , 2014 Readiness Hearing , Defense called matter Ready for Trial . State represented

to Court that one of the State's witnesses was out ofthe coutttry. Defense objects to continuance

. Court continues case 1 we~k . The State requested the Defendant be released .This was because

the time for trial clock was rum1ing out. (March 24, 2014) . Defendant is PR' d .

March 17, 2014 new Trial Schedule Order is entered . Readiness is now scheduled for March

24, 2014 and Trial deadline is April23, 2014.

March 20 , 2014 Defense files Memotialization of Objection to Time for Trial and

Govermnental Mismanagement.

March 24, 2014 Readiness. Both parties call ready for trial. Defense moves to dismiss for

governmental mismanagement . Motion denied , Court states there may have been

mismanagement but not to the level the Court can justify dismissal . Court does order State

proper witness list by end of the day . Case is continued on trial nm again .

March 31, 2014 - Mr. McCrae standing is not available and requests continuance . The

Defendant objects. Conditions of Release re: Curfew are amended.

Aptil 2nd, 2014 Trial Call- Defense Objects and files Memorialization of Objection

April 7 , 2014 , Trial Readiness- Defendant calls Clerk Office states he is on his way State

requests bench warrant . Warrant is authorized .

Aptil 8, 2014 Defendant is in court and matter is continued to April14, 2014 to reset dates.

April 14 , 2014 Defendant in court . Trial dates reset . Defendant did not sign order .

May 12, 2014 Readiness Heating .

Mr. Garoutte has requested defense counsel to file this motion . The motion is based on St.v. ~ iV\_l~VI.()t;) . .

Munoz, 60 Wn. App. 921 ( 1991) and St.v. Logan, 102 Wn. App. 907 ( 2000). Both ofthese

case stand for the proposition that where a defendant is released from custody and have been

under the 60 time for trial mle , the defendant still has to be tried within 90 days.

( cases attached for convenience )

·-.

Dated: ------

Presented By:

Grant County Public Defense Stephen Kozer, staff attorney #14413

.. l\llllllllllllllllllllllllllll\llllllllllllllllllllllll 07--768436


STATE OF W ASHINGTONl

Plaintiff,

vs.

Matthew S. Garoutte

Defendant,

) CaseNo.: 13-1-00420-1 ) ) Supplemental to Defense ) Motion to Dismiss for Violation ofTime for ) Trial Rule ) )

COMES NOW the defendant by and through their attomey the Grant County Public

Defense l Stephen Kozer, staff attorney , and respectfully files this Supplemental Memorandum

to the Defense Motion to Dismiss for Violation of Time for Trial Rule filed May 13, 2014.

Background

The defense hereby incorporates as if set out in full the motion to dismiss filed May 13,

2014. The Defen~e would note to the Court that the matter does get confusing with the

"interplay" ofSt.v. Garoutte Grant County Superior Court# 14-l-00043-2 (Drug charge- Mot.

To Suppress granted by J. Knodel!)

March 17, 2013 Defendant is PR'd on this case.

Defendant is still held on 14-1-00043-2. Later the Defendant is released on 0043-2 because of

State's witness unavailability. The Defendant feels this is a" related" charge because ofhow

the State has argued the case in the past.

l\

Defendant is back on FT A on April 7, 2014 .

He is set over and held in jail until April 14, 2014 . On April 14 , 2014 a new trial set order is

entered . The Commencement date is noted as April 14,2014 .

Defendant calculates that from January 21, 2014 to March 17 , 2014 is 55 days .

Defendant calculates that from April7, 2014 to Aprill4, 2014 is 7 days, for a total of62 days.

At all times for these calculations the defendant was held in jail on a 60day "clock".

Law

Defendant points to CrR 3.3 (b) ( 4) "Return to Custody Following Release."

"If a defendant not detained in jail at the time the trial date was set is subsequently retumed to

custody on the same or related charge , the 90 day limit shall continue to apply. If the

defendant is detained in jail when trial is reset following a new commencement date, the 60 day

limit shall apply .

It is Mr. Garoutte's position that on being returned to the jail he should still be on the 60 day

time for trial and that this time has elapsed .

Defense counsel would like to note for the Court that if the above computations are correct and

that Mr. Garoutte was in custody on April 7, 2014 and not appeared for a new commencement

date until April 14, 2014, that those 7 missing days should be accounted for in computing the

time for trial .

Wherefore the Defense respectfully moves for dismissal based on violation of time for

trial rule .

2

Dated:

Presented By:

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

\,l\~\\~1~~~~~\\l~~ \\\\\~ 07-758300

l<ARA KNUTSON

F'LED JUN 2 3 2014

l<.IM'PSRLY A. ALLEN

GRANT COUNTY CLERK

7

8

rN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHrNGTON FOR GRANT COUNTY

9 STATE OF WASHINGTON,

1 0 Plaintiff,

11 vs.

12

13 MatthewS. Garoutte,

14 Defendant

15

) ) ) NO. 13~ 1~00420-1 ) ) NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE COURT ) OF APPEALS- DIVISION III ) ) )

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

Defendant/respondent in the above case does hereby seek review by the Court of Appeals

of the ·state ofWas~1ington, Divisi<.~.n.III from each and every part of the~~ 1 ; ic.l~A: -r·-'·¥, .lz;:.r..

entered herein on t .. l"b""/ 'f ~<2.~ 1~ copy of the decision is attached to this notice. .

DATEDthis_l/_dayof ~ , '}:11lj c,

Name and Address qf Attorney for Plaint(ff:

Mr. Edward Owens , Senior Deputy Prosecutor

POB 37

Grant County Prosecutor

Ephrata, Wa. 98823

31 NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEALS- DIVISION Ill

Name and Address of Defendant:

MatthewS. Garoutte

Grant County Jail

POB37

Ephrata, Wa. 98823

. '

111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111

07-757332

i l FI~~D kd ORIGtr.;j, ~L

JUN 1 0 2014

KIM~~Al. Y A. ALLEN

~RANT COUNTY CLERK

HOLLY HINTZ



Plaintiff,

) Case No.: 13-1-00420-1 ) ) Motion for Arrest of Judgment and

vs.

Matthew Garoutte,

Defendant.

) Stay of Execution of Sentence Pending ) Appeal ) )


Defense , Stephen Kozer, staff attorney , and respectfully submits the following:

BASIS

That the Defendant respectfully moves this Court pursuant to CrR 3.2 (h)- Release After

Finding or Plea of Guilty, CrR7.4 (a) ( 2)- Arrest of Judgment, insufficiency of the proof of a

material element of the crime(s) and further moves pursuant to RAP 7.2 (f)- Release of

Defendant in Criminal Case , RAP 8.2 (a) Application to Criminal or Juvenile Cases, Release or

Stay of Execution of Sentence Not Govemed by These Rules and further notes to the Court :

1) That the Defendant was tried after the time for trial rule had expired and that the

Defendant had previously objected both orally and in writing to prior continuances.

2) That the Defendant was denied the constitutional right of access to courts when the

Defendant had noted for the calendar the motion to dismiss based on violation for the

time for trial rule when the Clerk of the Court did not place the matter on the Court's

calendar and that the jail staff did not bring the defendant to ;

Mot For Arrest of Judgment and Stay of Execution of Sentence- 1 Grant County Public Defense PO Box 37/238 W. Division St.

Ephrata, W A 98823 (509) 754-6027/Fax: (509)754-6027

3) That the Defendant was denied a fair trial by the Court not replacing the two jurors that

one of the witnesses knew and the Court knew on the defense motion to do the same ;

4) That the Defendant was denied a fair trial when 2 of the State's witnesses violated the

Court's motion in limine , by first eliciting testimony that the defendant was known to the

one witness because he had him on DOC supervision and second by the deputy

testifying that he had arrested the defendant 4 months later for possession with intent.

That pursuant to RCW 9.95 .062 (1) Stay of Judgment- When Prohibited

Credit for jail time pending appeal :

That the defendant does not flight in that all ofhis family and community contacts are

here in Grant County. It is true that the Defendant has PTA's but it should be pointed out

that this last FTA that was the Bail Jumping charge , the Defendant was late to court

arriving at 2:30 pm and court oddly enough had finished for the day .The defendant is not

a danger to the community.

The delay resulting from the stay will not unduly diminish the deterrent effect of the

punishment

The stay will not cause unreasonable trauma to the victims because there are no victims

as one would commonly think of the word , or in a legal sense;

Wherefore the Defendant respectfully moves this Court for an Order Arresting the

Judgment and Staying the Execution of the Sentence and to set an appeal bond as the Court

deems just and equitable

Respectfully Subrnltted,

~~ - 1'1'1r1 Grant County Public Defense

Mot. For Arrest of Judgment and Stay of Execution of Sentence- 2 Grant County Public Defense PO Box 37/238 W. Division St.

Ephrata, W A 98823 (509) 754-6027/Fax: (509)754-6027

cou.<ZT oF APP£.4LS

bJV/$Jc::JN 'JJI

OF TltL STA-'7'i:. o,C IA/ASHJI'IvtOAI.

$/A-TE: or WAS:flt,V(r7UA/1

PI£.~Nb£N71

v.

/f1#77fl£.w 'SJMOI\I (rAROt./T71:.-)

Aef'fUAtvr.

STA-TCM&\IT OF A~D/7/0NAL (n€0UN!JS

FIL.E.D FEB 1 0 2015 \ \t·,th I I}!• fd'l'l~ 1· ..

JHI%TO>'lJJ' ~~T;\ n: ( JF WA:\H:N~~ 1. 1"'! Ry-. ,._ •-·~ ..... , ....... .

/VIATTtl.t.W $. (r~ldf/UTTC. -/'8(/0/f59

<:...oyorl{ k.ttx.rt· C...OI'<I!. <U:NikA'

I')..) IS\) X' ..,. /t) c,

UYNr'l./1:££..1...1 WA. 1';32.~

'.'

i, .·. <'

\@_~~TI0/\1 OF 'SR#.il'-J 1'J!.'!!J:-.

~.rA. 3.3

A1":·. <h41'<t:U./77c'S ,<!1(1-#7- 7V ~~y 7'1tf!/Ar~L .c,wO<:~ C.n(• 3. 3' W'#/s WCLP~i''"c!A

, /:3'1 711£ i"RM(.. C:..OW//!.T Al\ltl /N VI<:Ji.,.,7/CN <:>/ W'l"fS#. C.t::uvs'T. ""Aft/; / SE'(.lY<:vv .. ·

10,

711{ Tl?//11. tU>u~r /.S A!t'spt:W~W!UL' ~~/l ASSUIA'Ntl<r A S'pl!!'c1.1y r~k'l£ .W...VAr4=>

t!r/( :s. 3,. ~ ~ !:..'fJ~§:o.(':t, /26 wn-<'d Bcs" (1'191?). 7'1Y.c· /~~u v.Aidc'~.l.,... .... ~

c.r~ 3.1. ;s rd /}1/t<..'ntc:r A PAr.t:NJ~r's ~t>NJT11<K.7YcM/A£ At'/6-·#T 7C S)d~·~.fA7 :1-~14l'.

~.1.4·7( It:· -:!1:4~, tl) wn. <~c:l 7tt, 7?1· 9 ..- ( IP 71) AJ.so, ro /}lt..oYtOII ::V /~C.N~/'r ~1"1'

foA. ·Til£ /Jrif£;VP4rV7' oNU ~<>'S~ • .'~U'liON If l"l/ll'14Tl:'/j." 'lTd:{#' K· £()~AS, IJY

wn. w zor I 2/(c (t'iiO J' 111.1 ~SIIi'N<ffo.rl', i'Jt".(' •• ff./C'/L' r(i?E" H'f!l"'l /I A"W.(.C'S untM"(

C..lf~ J,,l •••. li<JM441SH S7.1ii...v'.¢4A!.d liM£ (.Jflll.!'t Al'lld r;A/'<9-1. ST,-9-eT d~"'J'S ,.:¢!'( 7At/"t'

A-va l€£'1u'l,.,ml(r btWISfl'lt.. v<v1l'll ;:»et.JuiJt<..t ;;' T/1£' :s~-c.d.., 7'1fll._t. ;a4-'.lf'toJ LA,OJ.e.r

wtr/lv'l.,/,.. 4 T/fl/4L. ~ Y'· S..pu;yH!!t., tr3 wn· ~_.d'· <'<>?.,. "</~ -n (2ot..,). f>diT

;£)(1)ti.llt/i111Cl #illS .M~N 711'+1' f..lnl(f.'..ff A S'7it!IU """U IS ...,r,P"_.4-il..l!'tj) 1/Y.i:. ,(1/(/--IVT

7t; A <;~([/)"? 7/li?.l#( 1"1> W:4i.( AS 7'11< -'"'i/F4!.<rve'/l''7 ofi /N£ Jvr)IV-"91. ~l('oclt!S$1

Co<~r~~NQ1" 4( .t;;J!Iif.t.7JII:t:l.y /)A.t:J./i~vt:iJ. ~7.! I": S/.,l'k~~ 8' wn.-tc/ 170, $ n· ( 1,7(,).

(.(MK!'T teUlU~ LIK'I:.. ST~f(.f~r, '!'Jii:n/L4 1$<.' CVN$TJe</£4 71:) roJJ"',C~ ;w< ,.d'WA"<"*'SC /¢?

wil~ll 7/ltv wt-IU. .t,-v.<~<.rci). /fY_;(.t' MCQ...C:o1H~; 9'1 ...,:a. ec/ Pr, r.ze (/ns) ,....#<A/

IN'7~A'/Mt./!.l'M.I'v <crt,-;er l(!vg,4..r 1 7/t".t' <.t-'C..tt'fi.T A,<~OA~#..c'.r 7/I"A!" ~w.e.c:·.i' AS r~v~

7'11£y !l-4d 1$1!.£N /JI(?.4,t::/4.t1 -d'1 Tfi~· L~'(;/'U19~;tf'.r!' · t~;'J' t'· d:?(MJC:i~~£11~ ~<' wn. ~cf"

fp?,(), (?Z?.. (l979)- rrVI71A/.(..'1 1 ~.Or....fli!I'S 1-< • .l<.~k T('J "liM. tf!JI.4/N i.AtNv-<,J-4~ <J,I'C ;M[

lb..lt..l:. ~l) ~oN'fi7fi..4.J£. 711/i .14!(../U -'N AC.<.<J~4 wnN 7H,£ OII!'-"';L'TtN<r doby't .-.v;;e,v;;

O:g,y~~=+-~.:.....~~-~~5::1 ~ I'S"S Wrt• t:c/ #~Q, t.f~f.t, ( ~()()l,p) t/ 7#L te'ult..t: S -M.C4nllnl(r IS

:· ~./,J,NAkf-(3/C,...U,Ot,JIS c::..ou~rs NtEilll L<:K)/< AA:) ;:ult'l'/'1£~. !~1:!~-<~!?P.f.tot'!..::J_ ..,., W<.:M<..7~

~.!!:!:!_~'!_ _ _f3.41N1"1AI{,- 11\1!,:) 1{'1 w.-·n. <!!d ~31, ~¥f (<!ro<(j

&.<:.4-,-1!~ ·'J'?'/.1{ AJr:IJ!f?LIC4Fl<...W tY .A co-u..-tr reut..-E 7a A _r1-41"tn<:.ut.,..;¥"ii'

'Scr a.F rr1c1·r 'S' .A ?V'<tsrro.-v cr: '--"w, r#c <.c-u;er Afl..tv;~-c'>-fr'S /7 '*"vt:•t.r<•,

S.!,.1.:~--!:::_§!.i.VA1 IZ7 t-w?·-4,<?,4. I~ 1 /$'4./ (<or>F); ~~?E y,_4p{k«/&'WS"C, /",,j' l'l.¥1. ~,d.

31.J, ge-e (2ou8J

Mte, 0·.4-II(VUr'T([ I"'~(H..I.Ef 7#-17 Tl'/.tt. ((>'4';(/ Vt<.J/.r¢7.£0 H/S .1€'1(;../>IT ro

~tfl£t.IJ.., T-.(!'1.41. t-!NI.UH r,.y,.r •· 71~· .FctJe r~/~1.. '' l'f?w<.<: c-,t: <:.rAt 3.3 J.VA-'.c-.-.t'

rli.t C~<.~"'f.r r:A l( . .f.:~ ro l/4v4 /II.I r-<!IA l. ;:J.c,:,;:o;;:.< 7&E ~" ;)~ c.LocA· -e:-~..4~.....-.c-d

tf/lt!l(l?z 70 /-llf iltC(€'4U .... •

A('SQ, Aljvs()) tT'S turvel!.rfc,v ,.,#~IV tT -1t l...aw,ctJ r!Y..c -s7A7-<£ 7o ~.tt.f.AS'~

/14111· (r~'rl~ <:!N IANTVV41$L<t' <f.At¢t .. o'VO.f ro ,( yr.l("t-VtJ HI'S S,P"A(~,d,. '7~/41.. <:LN.!<'

'~<::) "1o 6..¢.'f'S A-I'T~A t'T ./:J.£'1(/~{, 7"/lk S7/1--7'CS A1'()770r\/ 7<;t t:..<:JNTINU<'" 4.CC.4-IA.S<;.'

rr hA..INlJ TI/4-T 'TN.t!.. "S;Trl-T~S I{!.CAS<oM W4S Alci· 4 l(!t'A.fo;VAI$(.1! ;,$..¢SIS 1=-¢~ 4

7/Mli..JN£... :

w/11 JI.A"-, 1;, <!.0/! Tlf.(. ST/f-T£ . ..Cit-(4 AN NV..Cf/¥>vt:47/C.VV ;N C.-4-UU:

/3~1-00</~() ~1 <:l/t4.1((r/Nt;- ()NA: <:.ov.I\/T· ()/ ~SCS'SIO~'V ~ A-r-!7#~-""'rVJ.C.TA...#/;V'..C.

ON 4-U(ri..)SI tlf 1

-ton Atlf!. v·~~nr.c H--.4$ A-<~~::s.7,ef).

eN At...~(~-~4r -~o ... ~011 ..M*· (rA-Kf?tr7TL #-4J h"1s /NI7Y;¢(. ...,~~-"'?I(;.IV~:.Vr

AN(, A 'li(.)f£..{Jvl.M/(}. CII!!IJ~II( ~'&<AS .(NT.C:~c/J: CCJ_,..#I¢-.tVC/lM.(/tiT IJA.r.C: 8 · <<.> •·./]

<WfNidUi: tO•'fl·l~ .-u...;.1wvas: 11-i/~d 7-eMC 11·11 .. 13 7if!/.4L JfA.tJL;,t/C.'//·If-1]

oN .44~ST ~!3 1 ~0/3 'Tt'f£ <:.vu,Z7 4N1'€(1(£/j AN 0~£\.£~ c'S7ol'fdLtSHNv(i.

(.'riiVIJrriON$ oF J<t£U,4SC:.

ON ..\A;V~"' ta, 'Z0/1./ /11.11(!, MJU,1..f"l'7':;(_ w4S ..-M!.ti!!CSr£.6 CN A wA~-<!,.,.,..,.r

4N~ f'o'~ A N£..._, cJI~W.. o/ ;;?(JSS.(S'SIQN 1#V1"rl/ NV/LI'\IT:

r:JN j4,NIA4.¢.1 '<1, :t.o/<1 .M~ri<ON 7'() ~<.s.£1 MUS ~n:.IM.AuUIJ EoA;! /-o/.1.(.11-NIN(r-

oi\J J41'/u~ u·, <..ol'l caut.r .¢Nr~iii!£A N.(w scH£1Jui.IN(r. ell?~:

0JMM{N(.fiM/>.NT /)A-i'l.: I·ZI-IL/ 0MNII.31AS: < ~//-1<./ ~t:.A61N£SS I 3 -)7-11./ :J-1~·1</

Tlt.J4L! ~ ilt!..t..;.t l'!Jc4M.JNIE..' 1 -~1./-/1..1

t

01\1 ~.Cdlf!U.41(!'1 1/J 20/t/ M,t;f.,Vt£ Ct't.rNUl .N!J€fWLS7;¢1.) ()A4t'Vd:lur IJ~·

'S,.C7 ov<U< ·r:o ;;~;l$.t~uAte 'r 2<1, :toN •

.... ON rf./:Jt<!.t,f4.1(!..'1 V.f1 'Zt;l'l'{ ~MNII$Uf wAS J./40 ;4-Ni) 1.$", ~.t., HJ!.~/1'11'(,-$

W£iek ~C,.T ~If. ,.i-141(.'1..# ~~ Z.CJ/<.1 •

tJN, ,A.~t..H S"_, :Zo/1./ 3.~, 1 .. '<J A40''rl<.ul/~ wi.II!A. ~ON1'11'1'UkiJ TO -+f"'lf(!U/

12, :?o/1./ JS.(.I,";I•IMS.C S1.,.,_7',e:S Wt7N.lSS.fS ,..tf'~ /V01"' .AV,.,.I£,41$(.16, .A41f!'. (j.4~~77.1![

0('1J£.t.T.S _To A.l\/'7 CON7"1NI.AANCIL.

OAI M4/(tll It?., :?.Cit/ '3. r II€.4""!Nv'e,.. IS #.EA"trd .1/'1 J~.;tt}(;..£' ~,(..

(J.N M~N 11j 2olt/ ..t?.CA'AtN.CSS /1£4~/"'*'' A(.l'£n1U C.4t(..S Af4/'".l'lt., At<...tll'f

P<:lie rlt!/4(.., o~J£Cil T<> c.oJV"rttl/1..1.4/1/CtJ:. S7..,..?;C INM~M..('() ~A!T 7hf47" CNii£ c;C

rfflf s.r~'r ·wnN..CSS,(S' w<4S c-ur or 7#~ <:...ouNr..r.., .4.N4 lll[£r;-w.L.J~A <.cri'Vfr.rVu-t./1/'U

TO :t!l-/111. /)CrbvS'£. O~J£t .. Tl Td C..ONTINUANC£. .. C()'Uif/!,7 fU:.Ntli.S '$'/At.T.CS A-ro7roN

l,lU"'M~.f /IS .N<oT t«,Af<;,NAI!!Lit. diiSI:S. /olt <!..ONrt.-VUANe.l:.. ~'1A-7zlt. 7H€N' lf!!.C9-<.t.t!S7·

'TH,i/.7 M/t. (}~c-14 n~. l!.c ,(lt.J...I:AS.i,./j ON jli:! ~Q. Tlrt./.11·( UW'ttNUII!tJ (Wl(. ~£Cit 10

-t(afl £~0 oltllt:.A.. bm!rt~l:ui'V(r ()~iSttM. 6A.T~ 70 "'"'~·"''!/' i'JA!d •

oN' ~~ zo, ~cl'l WbltU ht<r .Mi4f<Jl'l!l..,.lt<.A!J.ii"'1CJN "~ odJ<.Cl7<J.N h!)

71A1iL h,~¢ M/41... ·

()N ~Vi 2.<.f, Mit/ ~MtN.css. 4f.,rl'l ,4~r~..r:J' <!..:J.t.L 1/!~_,dy Fe.~ 7H;'4l.

~U:. ~V<!S 1"CJ illlMISf A't' ~vUNAf"~r· MISA'f.4N.-4(}.1;,!f;f4AJT • ./H<>hON ~;r,cJ,

Ct"/<2 '3 l 1'1""1,( tC<trt. .,..~,..,., A!Utlii:S £$MiiU.IJH 'NI4' r-"4M'£WfJ--tk FeN ~~~rr

70 Ft;..,LL¢w TO 4-NH.IIt!..£ --1 /)Cr'bt//:i4.Nr T#41r A~ti"'N~· 7~1-'ll. ;.N "..J.t~~tt 7 #Al'<;

A 1'1flt4L w1rii1N '1''/.lli AI.W11'1id 71,.,£ a!= I,C /}AtyS' O'il'l TN.< cH4'...e(i.,£S' Alflr.l£

/)IS.NttS$.~/l •

C4SU.4w 4i.S<I OlrO'J~t.ifiJ;. rl-l..+r ''r-H.( 7'1(1-+(. C.P'I-11(.7' IS I(CSpONSII!.U ,h;l(! At.SU~.o"\16-

A 'S.fllll.Ao., 'Het4l t..~Nbot. Vi( l.~:''i.T4Tl.' v. C141(ftJrol, 1<!1/ I!VI"t,et/aor- (/'/?(;)

or crll 1·1 (b)(t)(iJ(3)

(b) T'/AM:. R/1!. "ri/U"il.. '

(/) J'l!Fhl!d~vr ll£7i'ti1Nk.6 11\1 J141(., ... /M;A(N~ 111.1/ltC If «rANV.C.J nV

J41L '!i./14/..L ~. 4/fefi"'.A(i.HT ~ 7'>'111,.,. ( ~17'HIN 1'#£ 1.01\/~.(;tll (JF

U J l.t(o i)A.'1-s AITU ?'If(. c.t..'MM~NU:M£/Iri" l>~J-'11: "~c:.,h-<Ct.l 1N' ;fits ~u(.,C •••

(t-M?~II.fSif Abo.u.))

'" (l) ~t:U.,I/U Ct' M../7eNt:J.;;vr; /r A lJ(£/itN~/' I\ ..ee:t.E,4.t"OJ I"A!'t•A-t JAIL"' iU.'A:.At£

Iii!.. 40 • P~ l'IML 1..1-uti #4$ ,l,~pi~I£/J 1

:ni.C i..J;e.or Sli4U ;$.£ £...-!'...(rvLlof.:l\· ?o '10 l.k-ys,

#Ill!. 0>4..tvur7~ A!>SI!.-t'Tf 7~M-r HI:J Tl~tt ~;e 7A!I-t.(. tJ;;..k::s r.-eorl-f /- < 1 ·/</

t.::.JJMMll'll'(£-nttNT /J~r£. 70 3 -:2..</-1</ 7Jit.-4(. i),(,wtAlJ.,.t/-<! lt'4~4SS£.0 ~ (/O JM...1 ,,. i!Y

-""'14AttJ4-'T£. C)l"' C/'"1'! 1.3 (e>) 8£C~t4 ,1,1£ 1-1--1$' IJ<7?'f.l/'ll'£0 /.-y' j,..Jt( ""'-'Vd N<t'¥'1(,-("

11 1.1

IUlhtSd F~OM Jtfl..l( (1£/"'(/l(.C rlftl /.10-~ 7YAf,( t..t'"fflr t:' Kpf/~CO.

7N.£ 1-.et-t-c.. cC/IA;cl 1ri ~Hir c~t£ ;NtltC"9-T.<fd 7'N4r n· ;U"Nr.(;iJ r#.;s: sJ';"i(7.<'r

.A10'NQIV TQ C.ON7'1N<,N!. IJ~:~ 1'0 /T NOT 4.CI;v'(. ,.(! ;(!,('4.1'(yy',4/.1?~ ~4J'I'f 7"0 CO.-vJ'/.NW-4:,

'7,1,1£ ~-<7 71MN IA/JUC4-T:A..IJ 'J'lt'"'-r 7H.t!. <~.19-fi~' ~;'L.tl 1/41-'A: 1'0 4£ C-1-U.£.1) '7'1141'"'

'v'£ON.£S~ /j"'f.C..' 1?7/f], 7/'1.€. <t~"l':.r 4t..so 1NdiC14-7J:!() 1r C-"~Nt"' C.vNh'NW..(. ..,.;-";

/.3.(<:A.<Ai£ THI.ftli.''.i N'O '?/.,.,,fl..., 7"~1""-'(. 1.14.7£ rO t:."N?"''#U~ .t7' rc ANO '!#~'!" t:T

~l..bNT Ci>NFIDLII!. 1'1 S£rrtrv'Ct· .-'1· (:f..tA!,t{ rd..<:'~/01) /.!.lifl;;IIU-t.fA: .,..; CC1.,dl.../ltfl.l/ 4-ti'

Oof\1£. UN'T'It.. l"Hl. St~ ~$ !-/~$ ~J<';t't;'(£/j, ~/1 ~·n!Jd t/i(A/(l/1'1/v• 3-!7·11/

I* llr- r1)

TIM.. f!C/,4(.. C.ll'!..(:l(1' 71ftAI $ U(Kf£ST.(L) /<)lf! TH.! s ?I"'J.T.l to ~CI/£ ~ 41S.-t44J""(.

o,e /fJJe ~U'~'J: o/ M~. <i-~1"'71(. ?c1 !"~·¥'~') 71/L C~A!T _.,.U.;ff7'#e-"l -4c,t'.NO,.._C::.Cdo.al

rN~~tr· tr I$A-It.. ..,Cift.c. c..#4.N~CtJ 71:> Sl(;.fl/A7Vtl'it'J((' dcvv4, 7'-'1<9-r I'U'/u(../JN7 ~oAuu;:

HIS llf!.ltt4A-U'.. /.14!4<-!l'e l/£f ,,-v <:.'-<I~ ~t~'V" ~ol'/t'L~ rk4TTE'*'('. (.:.!.rttr .('D~.rt)

<W M4At.CI'f 111 l.C!t/ 1'4N' cl'llt/)/;1:1 ..<!edVUN(i. ;!,<~n .. W-'9S .C~A?.(d • CJN M-"'~C/1 :Jt,

2.01</ .4f\/ CA!!QC.( ""'A-S .f!N'I'~J<!CIJ /n! AE'~(t,.t,..e'.dS TO <:,<.)..v'Cti"/<YVJ o/ ..t!'lt''t/4.J'~ • iiW' ,m,.p.

(i.A.ec-'!.A77d )A-fl.. "TIA-11! Ce;(f.rl~fi:~(;N 7H~ .!J4tL. ;;V/JI~T(A AN .('tv,) AAI'iE: Fffo:.

C4<-1'SC 13-I~COI{~0-1 ol A4,4.,;tt_H '311

'<'-oN w#lt# .tN.c\IC..;L.(,£~ #IS A~:U~S.!. /.~t.CJAt

JAIL. (SU ~AU<. 7"/Atc ~rl~IC~(t..V)

f 1 1 1

lit! til.· ~l'f!¢U"'''Tt:. ~4i rH.-.r A<:.TI'jtN.£6 ,;AI J4tL" AtN'd ~.a . ..r~.r.c4 ;CJI!c-M .J4tt •

41(!( Ntrr AAo1/.SIG-UW$, 111.£ h£fi...Yf11<;;N C/ .<t.Ct/!4S~/l 11\1 wi:-.'JSr:t;er f10!K<:I i.vt.710N~.If!'t

4

lC6'? £./urt_t-111 p<r-· ;? 3'8 S7A-U:s,! J;,"',U.LA!i£ y, L£.4S~I) ~ i!.<!.4'S)rif(r.(M 70 s.er r.4.C£ j

M8ilt'41~. ,..,, (II r/1£ .A~r {);:. ~.61 .. .6-'ISml(r Qlifl J>l'~ ()/" IJ.t':I>'VCi- II!CGL''.AfJ',(lJ,

1)6·· 11 b£7141/\1 v. (J.) ro Kt£lf1 /i't.vM ;JA!c.•U:.C-IiiN'(J-; tJLi.A.<.,. (.t.) 1't C<:AI.&ko/£.

<J-4.J(!Q'IA"'!'T£ Alt~A.'i 'ri-I+T /i.C W4!i N.C td. ~ ,J#'1s1Ct4(..(.. '1 .(?.CU'4S.£.1J F'Att>.-n JAIC.

4N/l IlVA-S' /)Ji.'1$1C!fi..U'7 l>l..l'AHVL.J NV ..J4f{. • IY~S (/() t)~ ,:U:~rv6 t/[A-/11'-ec.J ON' ~-'r:CI'Y

'211

<f.> II{ ;:.~M 7H£ co~~n/'C.J!I'H~t'll1" dlll-7£ 11 w 7 ~ "";ti!(;>(.AA44...V7'1 $ Nfk.n~. ,J 7-N.(!."

((11..{/{!r N<YI t4(r~U:I! 14-'11"11 (iA~t:#'Vrn:r ¥/'t.lc.-trro/1/' H.< s-na ~rNr /t!.<f.·~~~'<'.tJ

7:'/Lt.. MA4e.VI 31 1 2..<>11./ wlll'~fl /J~-~'1" Ht~ /c ~s /JA.I r M.r 6o A~ ?J'~,ct,,/1/L

"rl/4-7 i..IL'TM"W·1'l'..t,1 tubN7 A.l4/'J.U J·t'IL l'i;r'f'l!;,v )"11/N 7?;> A *> d<~ty /Y.N'L-Lr"'oo'.t:: • 'l'#l''i_.

'"" rn~tN vto/.·4:1''£.:4 711~ t.r~ 7 . .J ~ui..C ~£<j411~1N'fi.. tHJM't'SS4t.

CN TU 'Ill $ ?".4 n:: .

,, wf/tllf A Jvt/Hrt:: A(t.t'4S(.'i ·"' iJt.Aii"IIAt4rvl' ;:.-E:t-J-1 c..u rc;.t)'1 I i'l'l:<.: ).'<:> ;:}..:1'1

l.llfllli" tU.;;.r.di-U'j t!lf(..:elli<K t.tlR{'S.~<.ilrL' Cl''' wh'.t:/I'Y'~·I'( H.t: II' ~<tE4J<!'d

fRJ.Vh C~d!Oli'1 ON /WI!. 41;W /)4.·'7 o~ ~Ol'll' ,1Aivl • •• 'IH:C'p.,.· .1j /Y(I

vt0/.4 m:/1/ tJI. en~ 1. J ~o t,\l.-110 .-1:; rrlt:' 7/<'/41.. t> ....,.,.?'#,..;..v ?-o .J4y.r

ol .4~,(/fll(f·N.AIII.tNT "l!:i.!lL.L\!JL .. ..&t.c:it!U .. _..z:lfti!£JL.. ... /I.!L....flt.:__ujSJ.S.£_tl1'I-_•1.LaY.

' I ) ~,ld;J.l:Q..0.'1, I<:A-t/J)f4ll{ 4iJD€'1)

~- (qO W11 . .#;41· IIJ<!..I (tCI'>J)

.4Ai Ajlj.N.'/.1.4/E c~u~T" vv1LL. .•\t0T /)61'&/I'O!B Tlt'/.0' 7'1<!/4( <:i-·l ... ;l'eli' Df.~IS~<.vv'

(../1\fLL:.n 7/{.(. .4j7,tlt.Li..d,..v/ ,,f.'/4/.t:..~. 5 . .4 ¢/.lA·~<" S!lt•w.t/V~ ntt'.-9.1' Th'.<t T.f!/liJ( <'.1/'t.-t.-<ei"i

CrtC:r--tuVIJS dli" rrtlt? 1.../J'tl'l<:~V41'5U ,~I! '.-4'.$ tv·v'f'. I?·•U£' / ~-· !.t;f.:L; .. ~:£~-1.,.(;_t,__{, __ /:;___.,gJ.t.ll.:iC.-.r:<?, 7'1

""~' c..,l d , < & (/'9 71) ; s_:",.... t&:.....:.::_ ... _t<fc/1-<!;c./1, 1 'I') t.tdJ. z~/ 4.> <; 7, (.,P-I ( <?C•c· 'l J

f1£r<'7c:., i'!N 7Ac.ct.4L <::Vt..;X!7 .1<'.rv;c·J II'>'~· yi,.?JC'I' .• ·t-70.Tio""' ro c<..·.·v;•;-v<.,-< .. .. <:~..-,;J

A<:.kNo"'-'U. Ovl: )J 7//.!." t"'-?r?-c.-?1.4;V<:t.... (l/ A /147<:·.;.'1 '7-<!14t. A,;vt} /'.J./47 AM!- 0-4/'<!t:•UT/.t" j·

'5f'1l!:'t·'tJ'1 71'?14£. <: I.O<C .1:::' Vl,.-4f .4i.4·YO.fol' u;t:J· ,t'tVv"-'-''"1/(r /NIS', 71'1'£ ( 1/-'<..tAe. ;!" t-4'//.?n:'G•/l.<'"At'?'-f

Su'(r(rcsre.d 7;./t9--T rtl£ !ilrP-J/: Arl't;·r.e: _..:,>?:? IJ;J~Pl.J'f.tli ~·«! L;~.c·t..c·~s4.· <-'-"' 7.twL' ;)~;.c:c-vJA-,11/·

wr/tc/-1 <:.u?-vJ'I<<vei'V.<!'·., 1rs /J;'li!Y.t<.? ;,).<.'(tJYGI.''-' ro A.e·N'r 7/'/C S.7A7EJ" .-1-?C71i."•~' "'""'

<ivrv'r/1'1/<..1[. 1'1 i'v4f' 7/-!C:' ?A:?;4t <.&-'L-M:?7> 1k11'7 /"(• .t'..-vT•·r-<':.<:' .4 :,/(.?.!<:'4 7 /A:..;/-'9( <..t/11'/)-t".!?'

<u•R ?-l .

.NJ/'. O>t~<ttrt-iJ'Tt: ,4-l •. n:, <c<S.Je.'c.. rt"J 7u ."'.r./'7 <.!.C.•n17'//v"<..t-1/'I/O::.<f s ANO 7r"1""-;).t:' c t:<''A~

ru ./ .. tr!:: C.f/1 .. 4 t«:, r :'·tf4 l' II&. "''V 1'L;t/LJ~4 ro .<:. .Yc··.c•<· ..r-::: .... It r ·s·,.<:"J'd"ctid 7 !"?C'l'-"l < A?/f/y-/.l ;:

IlL: 4 {,S.;;,., .-'1-.<!(/·U.t!) 7 1-1"'1'7 7"1'1£' ..t!.C" vt-'1 J'

IJ~.J 71'1/{ (' (ll..f.<;e:7' ()Al fi?-4/'CtJ/ li, t'Qil/,

. .4 C'~;..N rt,-Vt,.v~-rvcl..' r...,._·v Bt:: (}.<?4-nrr.cJ.

1\/0 Ooo4 c""<:-rs.r 7 v c l·~v J't/VU;.-·

~?£h1CI/ 'S -c•<!'yvll'~.t!d 4..., A?tl?t:

yt.A$}1. <:'V\iP• A/.?7. I S<:"~,'lfVtl I() ;l-'P{.('J '

, ... 1\.H?"(C,l NV 4t.l C4S.(f .'>:'/14L t: t:Ji: AaA--IIN/Sl,i:Ff'?t;'J U,l!fhf'/"1//.'f , . ..;tr·vd 14-d'/1/J1-fT

WNN<:U i1A4'1 .M.t~ •: (t!....,t?/1,1/J"tJ ,"J.rJ/u:IJj

IV!.ta'. (j.,.,_!f?v·IA >·T£. 's· ~.(" vrn 714 TI(J1v'A l. ;<!l(rll7~; ...,_I;.·" .of£~· ~-''t(;/,4 //< .d t-v-#.(.'n; 7 /'1£ ( PUA? ?'

c-.. -e{INed A,--,1 ,.,/I'Vtv'(CiSS4~'1 /)li't.:l,/ <'.!1'7 .4?../..ou--'tV(i- ,4,.yyj 14-?1'-?1"-'&;:JI.·II'.:?/. .. .._, s·u(;,.(r.t-Sl'l/1/t·

"1' t• 7/IE' s7-"f;r.(", 7 c .( IT/I'('"r.,? IJ; f·+fl.f"f 0?<' If?£ l<!'"--?J'i' Nt:t"' 1)/' ,-·;e...-v/.-d/i/7" :7(.r c:.n'V!"<: t.-t.~.-rvc:;,vr

7Hf "';,t?c.e·47

TiGl!-9'( C'£vtk <:"!-tA;-,,...,.t- l:t..t-<?:'?/I<:·A? A.{~,-.t . ...,. 7'0 ,<~-Ltv·t. ... ,~:~-.. :.;;.;-· ~A-~'·t..-tt.IJ

ht:'M.t" 4,..1 7 h/i /1•-t/< r:ks.:. ()/. r;Hc c~<:'t··J.'I,-/l/4. c ,;(!..,,t..<f:"f .4..r..,<) tV(..< I' /.J.<: cc.-vv Y;J·f";""'"vr

Willi ,;'l.dl'l? W'lfS/f. <~t!rV'Sl'I'Tt·IFIV-'VAt.{. ;.;!lvi'!'I 1.;.,C. 4-<!./".. I J'<!t i/"vv' /0.

/3tr4f..lj't: llt't! CV'-4~ ;- VIOL ..::r-1-· d ~~ ~ .?. j ..-.<..-vi) ,.fA? I". I Y<:'X:J/•:"-'1/ /V <;•/' 7 rt',{' rv4J'/I'.

<.'.u-·v.n·. 1)/.VJ.?t.f f4 <. ,. s ""'«7._.,.,,~?-t'tl.

:.'

t.j .•.

.Lrt~4Efiu.¢.N,l: .. _!~'t..t9!:! .. !'!:!.4'7JOAI

BAIL ..JU.MfJIN(r <yA. 1111· 170 (tJ(<J

Mt!f. ()-;"'if!.OU'T'Tt; 's Nv'/<....e'A-'14'7'1'0,...1 IS INSI'J,t:,:lc;./!,,;Vl" ON #IS' d-4/l -''-'ri?P/N(r

U/.4/lVC. ~I£.'CJ9VSii: ff ~'SAn C<;;JA~Ti"'.IA/ At..l. 7#!. li..SS-t#Vl/.4( E<t.cA-1'-t·.-~;TJ'

~ ;r#.f (A!I-nt.f) VIOL47/AI(r HIS ~/)(7,1/ A-NJ ~A!~¥'N7# A#!".ti'r/D.-Io'£/'1/T

/?IQ-#.7 70 ·711£ t../S. COI'VS717'!..17ION 4Nd i'V'AS# c.ows'T. Ailfi!'T / SeC7FON

4/'11 · IJ\I~A:TION .Mt.IST C.CI'\IT41N AU £S'U:t-1/i"l_.,.t. £i.£,Hc/VTS ()r A

e,A;IMf:· .. !fi'li.4...Il.. v. llit.fit>l_ 10/ IIW't··-9#· !SJ' (zcoro) · 7/>I.C:. ~Af.'77'<VV"""£ &#/..-V/) I• ,, ,,~

/11/(./.i..,t/J;tY(r• £:SSE.N'7'1'4l .CI.i:'Nt.CN7'.i ~1471/c:"i 7#AVV CN.t.y S7.rl'n..-17CA!y E~EA'Ibi/7S"

IS 7() Give 7#{ ACC.Lls£1J ~O)IM~ N¢71<:.,_.1! ()F :i"~ Al'47t-'l(!~ aj: 7/I.C <:.HI~

So ?WA-·T 7H.e A<.<..tJU/J C""'N ~,e:~;e~ .4o/ A~£,/..11.4'7.€ Mroetl-'..f.L". $.:Z:B£ _ _t:.,

/5l.O~SI(IIt_ 1/7 W...V. 4/ '?$, /CJ (1<?,/)· wii.UV su/h<.lcd<.'f 0/- .;...VI-O~A?477QN

IS ti/IJT Cl/4tU..III~~/) I.IN7'/t. APJ,e~ <!.ONV1(,,'7'/0N1 7H.I! m/~(1"*?.4-?,..f.TfON IS Ud'~lf"4(t't

Cc.rl~Utft) 1-"1 /A~ C./ /TS VAlt./Jii-.7

• I{JOI(SV/KJ 1/i' W/\1..((,111" _.,,. /0'1. 4.-'1/

tNfCI<!MA.'i/()/IJ wtl..l. /!l.( t.Jpl/<:d i>l'tl A~,-d;f'.,JJ.(, 1.-1/v'tJ.t:~ 1/IJ! L/d~"lt'4t (.(.-NJ7#f?U(.'7/()A.I

i!(JU, 1/ ArJ A;:'/'AK!t.',Vl'L 'y ,ll{tfi.SSINV. E.tEA'f-!.'/11 T #""-, & /A'/~l '1 1-*?tf'I.I.CIJ //f?oM

"7'111:; t./ltll&-<./4(rL c/' 7Jt:C <:..fl,lf(,lr/NfJ. oOWM.tNr. ~J<J~K, /1''1 IHIN'. ec:/ ..,, 1(.)<./.

/II.CVC.It7N.!.i.£.SS, A lll.klf?t"'(. hA61N'tr <!"""1/NOJ' Ct.l~· AN PV/O.KI'A?""'TI&\.1 7'/>f...-'T

~.4/VA/()T ~ C.ONS7;(!t..I.(.:D '70 <:i-11-:t! .-VO,/'I'U: ()I" 01/i! TO (.(JA./74.1.1'\1' /;'\/ S'OM<C.''

MANNE./(. if/l £SSCN'714L l!lLMcNTS ·tJ/ 4 ~I'll_,#!.'. ~UJ~:_ ~,.,_,...,/2{U;_/..,I,., /2. &"'",

WN· W 7"1'7, lSt)t (l??r) UNlJ.C:Je ~SIINV<rTOAI (.41rlr'1 "i"o &.c <:..orvvtf..tl!:lj CJ~ 4_,/'1.. ;

JuMtJJN(r, 711.£ I.:Jt.rt'.NIJ#/1/T A-lUST &/{ <:.1/4-.r(rt:IJ w;711 A /~l<!71c:.ut4.K/' uA/c"i'l't/1'11~

~t€/M.i!: ~!.-1Jl_x.:~, /o<:> wn· 4,11~· 4J'<V, ¥Z7 (?cvu) Ct;ru1Kl7f A'!c,.'l.lw A

tl.l/4li.Li.N(h( 7'0 7/tl. St.t/ht.tbl{(..y I)/ 7/N: Cl/4r.zW,Vt· /j~A4c/VT 41( .N'OVO •

'S"J:t1:;'f...4.. .. f::.._.~-:l<l::l./)t.Mil::J, I.e!' wn. W 7'n, 8ttt ('<>fS)

1

JANI..IA/t,, Zli, <'<.;>It;/ IS 11\/SU/~/C/c/Vl 4.C('At,.;'.S.( ,-7 .daLJ" .FVOT <:.O;•vO'."if,NV A;(.(.

71/.t:. £SS£.A;7/At. .£.i,E,w,(;V7r o-F' 71'/.(. <;rtiAI.e· ~t:'/. &41t ..JtAM;di.FV(;.-, V/O.I-<rlrt/r::.-

1/IS Sor711 AN'I.J 1(:-'t..l~l~/117:1/ A#.t:;vJArcN?' 41&·#7.S 7<.~ 7h'.:C uS'. ccvv.sT,/~·'17/0""v'

ANd W"'S/J. <l•N.f1". Alf!!7, I S<!"<7l'ON 1 .A....VJ .?t?.

tiV' £Vc.lf!'7 /JIE'OS;;::cum:yv, 7/IL MF£;V0..-4N7 .#rv.r.r d£ ;/j/'/<..·.>t?-~.0 o/ 7///

NA-7Uift..:" ANI.J c.At.I'J'£ o.t-" 7'h'<' ACC.'-I.!At77'(Vl/. i./ S. <.oNS':l• A-.(;v<) • .j#!7 J. rl-'""-I'h< <.t:.ll'"ll'.i/-;

A;ti!i. I k~7lv,.v' 2e. /W..t /N~..-HAT/./.).'1/ s#..,.l(.i. 4< ;-:1./.-tr/?V, C..O'W<:./S~/ .-4/V'O

IJiriNiT.C WAZ/1/.ri/ll S7r97£A-t;crvr 01· 1#.< /:::S'J",[,..-v·71.4,;! ,.:;ror <:.o..-vs7;.7cr//,-r/~ 7/YA:

f)fhivS..l QI/~W..J. Cr-4 2./ ("1)(/) /7 A?u.r-7' ALt.-6·~ .. ~Ac,;-r S.~At,...U~...,.,.,.;:-;.<..-Vc1~

£n:~'r 'S7-4n:..t'TOA!'7 .:£L..t:I#<!/VT ~y·· 7;#.( C:"itl~~..t:". S..M/,<• ~.-', .l'i.:!.~ ... "'Y:Jt:~··, //.7 i-td'V. .ttc>/ ;IIJ,

/01 (1'1'')1)

/!w.lt. Jurt-r;J;N(I• 1$ ~//N.t.fA /N A?<~- <);,?. 7w, /}t). '7'H.<! .(!:'LL'..-1>1"-t'.,_r/?f ()/'

Md Juh!;JNll(;-. AA!!~- ~L;r ;t/ 7'/1~' tu'l'i:rvtJ4N'T: (J) wAr ,1'/[.(t) r<..l;-;1 > <::H'4~c;~·/J

wJrH, 0~ C..c•Nvl._.:r~l) o/ A /AI<eT!C.tJ(._..,A "-A!.I..#..(,· (?) ~4S' lt9i.'.t~d'S.I/p /.1'.1 ctfU'.I"<'T

o,;:I,)EA <>~ -4oA?77rt.iJ :ro <!AZit. ,....,.7h' ·;;;w.e· ~"pu,,,e,fA?.eN'/· c.,.· 4 'S<..~<fU;>«'<fl/v.J"

fliRstvtV/1(. Ar?/<:~-'<'AN't:.L; ANd (:Jj k~vC,wl.-v'crL'J /:AIU.t) 7'Q .4_..?~.-? ....... .4'r A!'""-J'c'.>f'.-'A"I!(:).

:J.l!!:!.f:.._Y.':. .. /12/?.{, l<>o w...v .4J44. 412~ (pel (<ooo)

1/..1£1(!£, 7'/il:.' A-H.CNND tA,//Cif!/ri4'TIGAI '"'-1 <:::c-v.v:r z sJ,.,.7:td :

" ()N ()t(! F~t!JVt(T ;;-!.!. S./11 ;JA-'1 c/ o<:.:rc.'><!k:4', :<o/.1, IN ;r,lo/~ S7AJ:<:.' ()/

W4SHINv.rorv, 7/f.! .4dvrrt- /V..¢,.('J Jk;~&/.JA.--vf',' //<lvr/1/(r &~/1/ ~.c:4C~s.t()

IS? ~n.;e;· o~d£;tf o,f ,-?o.N~h1<$"d 70 4All~ >+-/7,; kN<.!w<..<:d(l..t o/ 7.1/A'

.<?E!JI.It~cMbV7 {.)/ .4 St.tdJ'£jU../hV7 t<f.CX?JtNV-"(. .4,a~4.-t",..,,...vC..6' di!'/p~/

./1' c.tYU#If!.:r 01'-. 711/S 57.,.,_1/.£ tJI'f! Of' 7/K J'!t.(.j'UIA'/t:McNl' I'<-' ;O"[.tf,4o.-e7 70

A <:.trl'euc.."l'li:.:YVA( r~''-17..., ,.,~ s.t.-'!'nc£'" ,,,r ~"<·.,.,/T.i!'NC<, d;.J ,;At(. n.J

Aj7;d(!41( o~ btl:J /At(. 7'~ SUI(?tet;NM.If? hi<! S~.e'YI<:..k: ()/' U~/zt'C~' r/V

w/ltt:J.I A CL4So; /,3 .:A C /L ioN'7 l/4r 4L<'N /d.-4'1), TO WI I'"" ,' 0.4.4/1/T

~N'T"'' Su;aO?tO~ ~1(.'7"' CAVf'ti A/'o. IS-I·oot,/20·1; <:.ON7.1f!""Ar'1 70

" ~V/5etl t.t>M ol- WAS#IIV(r'70N ?;~~. 7fo>. 170.

,, 111/SI.IF/~Jb\/T .t!!.CC.4u'S~ 17 /A/L-t'J 7C /tJ4;VT//'f ~Al-7 ,rH~7/C.t./t.~ I.J..VJ.C<(!i.';f//1/(,.

~~.111~" ~ wAs C/14A!0>£1J w/7/f &ur .INS:1;t;4~ oN" 7 .4LU crctJ A ove,,vr <:,c;·LoVl'y

St-~,4/i.I'GIWI <'!vt~lt7 <::Ausr-: A/vM6<tJ<E?. (>i'L ,.,.;,.fni?i-1• 7t(.W ~-;u.·~; J;t.,.,t. <?t, 2(>t<f)

C./7"'1-·Tit>N 71'1'."1.-r <! ,.t/"""'<1!(;-,c d ();l'<i'T 4 '1 ,t("L'I".t~/~• 71:1 ;pt/.t!.' .N"U~4k:;"'!' tv" ;1 Cil' ?<f

Olll./)INF/./11<:1£ d1J .-vt,T SA-T/f/''r ilw.tr ;tf';t!OUSf, ~.t'i'r-'-'1/C. ~~c"'v ~.Jc:tff, TH.L' <:.fYI.-/.If!:r

A!l;.tr,tl(f,;.n:J •· [w]lt rkll-'4 <€/'.('1'9r<'tJt.., S"'!NJ 77/;97 k/-t:ir,.J.,,.v/1 ..tA<.>v.(GI ...vc.r A4r<

.ro, s.(A'J'EtN r~ r;l.t( ,.qw.t..Es oR l('..r!(i·w~nt~.rv.r 'T-*<1!:'1 .4-'ii!'£ • .-ccuu·.() <)I" V/<J~-'fL:n...V(;>-,

~ J lf'r w-n•.t.t/ A7 ~'J) (!f'H:J (tMrf"#IJ'/f A.Jk:J)

t:::/IA~<r.l/J C.Nt'f A C~:u A/u~d./'4' ~~7.11'('1<:' 7/14'-N .1v'A-+rA( ~ ~AI!l'/cu~,;-~ C.~-'4?..:'.

~~ /0/ wn. A/"',.4 liS$~ 88/i (~(·t.>'l) •

TIP: ~~c.es.r.,s~-M"'t r;.*.rr .Do ~7 ~p.cA~ nv A .... v., /C!Af:N~ • ..v'-"'t' 4.,. ,.:-,,.,,. <(.VII'SM·

I..I(c..rtoAI C J9.N r/I.C '? 4C n'-u.-1/4 Nt/ :r:#:C ¢#~~.ml'~ Jc.~ .Y_..:',.J'~ 6<::. ( <414' I.C: C#' 7"1'/1{' 1

7/llf ((;<..(;<J' NC:<::O .lllt>7 ~'A-eli 7/1.< I.SSv..;: tJ/ 14#4.'771t~# A?Al'· (f,Jf!l-ftUt.T/""-' W.4·f

.4~7V.+lfA,. 1'?/(!G.Jr..IIJ/{~.j. /'1S //V' ~. {)y<flfWU7'7A: IS ~ . .';-v?//Jt.l('(j 7t:.• ;f!eU<(!'/

/.i.CC¢<..r.f.l' etc 7/lol{ J'/),2~·$- .1"'.4/~u~.l" 7o ,.e?i~« ,.,.~.C. 7'H.r' .c:"S.S<.·-....vr,;-'fl(. c·~~4..-4'.r,.J"J' ();"t'

?/IE c,et~.C <.>/ d...;rC J• ... u ... ,;d,.l"l/V.. ""''/' 7'/Y;(' /...V~.AMW7i'P...," ~#c# r;.>.....,.d7-4.'4 7;11!«

/J;tMefl<:.4"t.4,.. .VMJ(;'~t~-~ c-e,,.,.c ''r~t.¢·:r ~~~~'Sw(.?"l!'tJ ,...~...,... ;-.ffc d"ff,..e: .J...,....,.,.....,..,~

cll~(re.

IJ!cAl..fJ.(,,' (t4!ltllt...(771!:: r <:lcNJ;/,_i.-tTrr,vV..-1(. ..-{/(}#? 7'Q 44:' ..;,y'/i,?!/!11?<d <)/ ~ .. H~[

oF- 7/f,C <:::1/4~· vv4t Y/Oi...,1'iC/), .4Nd #II ~/I!IH'P ""' dtlie. ,.,A'!f.•U..J:J' 4'VJ ~fj.U: • .4rt.' ~~

wAS' Vti!.l47.(;JJ u.vtJC-<" <feY?# <:Ci;t"'/J'J"/?r..t71'MI'f1 Ar"-'~d IS .e'...t:.')k'~...t7(/ 7(.) .Jif.--H4'1'

C()o«..N1' .z; t/A/1. JVt4'1,..,.,Nl/(... .•

/2./:'.,vc.:t S'. TO'I.,<JVSU,

cvu~e1· or 4;t:Jr~t'AL <; <.~.le:'#/!!1<' [)1 ... • .Lii

.M-ti<\ tH",'t~llz.ah't,n c~ De.~e.n'5e Obj'ec\-;,,"" o'"'" M.4rc::,~ \ / 1 oO 1"1

I l{-O - o c "( d-0 - I

AV>A.fUA..JeJ :r. n f'oro'V\t-A 1'ol"'\

o t\ 'iJ ~ t\ a.-l" a.o 1 Lf

. . . . ..... :· . .'

. . .

....

·· Tom Jones~·Sheriff JAIL. TIME CERTIFICATION .

·· ....

. :

. Th~ foU6wing i~foi-mation is· provided for the. purpose of crediting time span~ in c6~finement ~er RCW 9.92.15~ ·prior toj~he transfer of the b~low listed subject: . . . . . . \

I

·-=---.....:--........._ ___ ...-..~:; . ....._·51~ .. # WAD .u B ~Ol __ :' Ust~d are all. date~ of arrest.al'ild release co~cerning the above subject up to the' Date of transfer.

\. .

START DATE END DATE TOTAL DAYS SERVED ''

·~~rl~ \ "1-)· · ~.~,~t-\?7 .4· f:-3·o~ l4- · ... .'~ ~-n.\'.~1~ .. Gn

... LA~.If~.~ \u· .. '· lP - d-L11·-J 4 ·. ~~ '· '•

\ ·' ''• I

( . ' .

" I .. " •'

'. .. .,

... " "

'• "

, .. •·

... TOTAL. DAYS~ SERVED 14 t· . ..

. ·.· (j ~ ·.. :: . . '

Date· . · .

" ;

. ·~

,. I

., .

I •

. ' •

!'' I

' ' I . '

i . .

I , .

; . I

I'

I

. I

t ..

. ' ' :

IIIII\\ IIIII It\\ IIIII\ 1\1\1 ~I\\ ll\11 \1\1\ \\Ill \11\\ll\ 07-740947



Plaintiff,

vs.

Matthew Garoutte ,

Defendant.

) Case No.: 13·1-00420-1 ) ) Memorialization of Defense Objection on ) March 17, 2014 ) ) Re : Denial of Time for Trial )


Defense , Stephen Kozer, staff attorney , and respectfully memorializes the Defense Oral

Objection on March 17, 2014 and I or the Defendant's ProSe Oral Objection to the State and I

or the Court allowing the State to release the In Custody defendant , so as to extend or otherwise

push into the future the Defendant's time for trial deadline .

Background

The State had originally filed a- Possession of Methamphetamine charged against the

Defendant. The Defendant had missed a court hearing and a warrant for the Defendant's arrest

was issued by the Court .

The Defendant was arrested on the warrant on or about January 28, 2014 and the State

moved to amend the Information to include Bail Jumping on or about that date.

That the case as amended, was set for was set for Trial Readiness Hearing of March 17,

2014, Trial on March 19,2014, and an outside or end of time for trial period of March 24,

2014.

- 1 Grant County Public Defense PO Box 37/238 W. Division St.

Ephrata, W A 9&823 (509) 754-6027/Fax: (509)754-6027

. ·. ·, .

On or about January 28, 2014 the State also argued for and had bail set on this case. The

Defendant is without financial means to post bail.

The Defendant was also being held on a new charge of Possession with Intent to Deliver

und~; another cause# in Grant County. -, '

On March 13, 2014 the State finally provided after approximately 40 days discovery on

the Bail Jumping case. The State also provided 3 amended witness lists on the above entitled

case.

That the Defense worked all day Sunday March 16, 2014 to prepare for the new charge

of Bail Jumping.

On March 17, 2014 the Defense called the case '~ready for trial ~' ( aside from the eye

doctor appointment). The State made some excuse about readiness for trial. That the Judge

ruled that the case was going out to trial on March 19, 2014 .

On March 17, 2014 after the Defendant was taken down into the jail the State infonned

the Defense that ( and this was new ) the State key witness Officer Harvey would be out of

country , the State's representative stating he just learned of this . (Ironically the Officer bad

just testified in a 3.6 Hearing with the defense and the same State's representative the

Wednesday before and made no mention of himself being out of country" on another case

involving the defendant) •

On March 17,2014, the State had the Defendant brought back up from the jail and had

the case recalled before the Court. The State explained to the Court that it's witness would be

out of country and just learned of this . It is unclear if the Court or the State suggested that the

Defendant be released on the charge , but it was suggested and not by the defense . It was

Objected to . the Defendant was released on the charge and the case was continued for trial .

TIME FOR TRIAL RULE

That the above procedure of releasing the defendant I week before the time for trial

rule expired l was done to thwart the defendant's right to a timely trial while incarcerated. lt is

the "spirit" of the rule to have both sides prepared for trial in a timely manner or otherwise

extend to the court the courtesy of a "heads up" that a continuance is needed.

-2 Grant County Public Defense PO Box 37/238 W. Division St.

Ephrata, W A 98823 (509) 754-6027/Fa.x: (509)754-6027

The State was not prepared for trial. The State waited almost 40 days to give the

Defense the discovery (most of which was located in the courthouse) on the Bail Jumping

charge, most likely in the hopes ( and we have seen from past practice of making it necessary for

the defense to request a continuance . The defense was ready for trial having worked on the case

a good part of the weekend. The defense was not asking for a continuance. The State had not

asked for a continuance. It had been suggested the defendant be released on the charge.

The State had originally asked for bond when it suited there purposes and the State's

purpose was to keep the defendant incarcerated, especially after the State had amended the

lnfonnation to add the Bail Jumping charge. Now with the State not prepared for trial ( it seems

plausible that the State anticipated a defense motion for continuance after dumping all of the

discovery on the Bail Jwnping charge on the Defense March 13, 2014, for a "Readines~H

calendar March 17,2014), the State requested no bond in the matter. (The State also knowing

full well that the defendant was held on another case number and thus would not be released. )

The State doing so only to not have the case dismissed for time of trial rule violation.

This was not the intent of the rule .

Conclusion

The defendant position is that the case should have been dismissed . Thwarting to the

time for trial rule when the State is not prepared within the 60 days as required of the defendant

is not the "administration of justice"

Dated:

• 3

if:;;y Submitted,


Ephrata, W A 98823 (509) 754-6027/Fax: (509)754-6027

.. . ;. ..

-4

c~ }1\·1~ Grant County' Public Defense Stephen J. Kozer #14413 Attorney for Defendant

Grant County Public Defense PO Box 3 7/238 W. Division St.

Ephrata, W A 98823 (509) 754-6027/Fax: (509)754-6027

... I ( ') \

Public Defense

o~" JAN 2 8 2014

Received v

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASIDNGTON FOR GRANT COUNTY


Plaintiff,

vs.

MATTHEW SIMON GAROUTTE, EPD, 13EP1267

Defendant.

No. 13~1-00420-1

AMENDED INFORMATION

D. ANGUS LEE, Prosecuting Attorney for Grant County, State of Washington, by this Amended Information accuses:

MA ITHEW SIMON GAROUTTE of the crime(s) of

Count 1: Possession of Methamphetamine, 69.50.4013 Count 2: Bail Jumping (From Class B or C Felony), 9A.76.170(3)(c)

committed as follows:

COUNT 1: Possession of!! ControUed Substance [Methamphetamine]

On or about the 3rd day of April, 2013, in the State of Washington, the above~named Defendant did possess a controlled substance, to-wit: Methamphetamine) including its salts, isomers, and salts of isomers; contrary to the Revised Code of Washington 69.50.4013 and 69.50.206(d)(2). (MAXIMUM PENALTY-Five (5) years imprisonment and/or a fine of not less than $1,000 nor more than $10,000 fin.e pursuant to RCW 69.50.4013(2) and RCW 69.50.430, plus restitution and assessments.)

(If the Defendant has a second or subsequent conviction under RCW 69.50.401, .4011, .4012, .4013, .4015,,.402, .403, .406, .407, .410, or .415, the minimum fine shall be $2,000 pursuant to RCW 69.50.430.)

JIS Code: 69.50.4013 Cent Subs No Prescription-Felony

~

r···~ r>, •'··

: ·~ .~ . .

COUNT 2: B@il .[umging

On or about the 8th day of October, 2013, in the State of Washington, the above-named Defendant, having been released by court order or admitted to bail with knowledge of the requirement of a subsequent personal appearance before a court of this state or of the requirement to report to a correctional facility for service of sentence, did fail to appear or did fail to surrender for service of sentence in which a Class B or Class C felony has been filed, to~ wit: Grant County Superior Court Cause No. 13·1-00420al; contrary to Revised Code of Washington 9A.76.170. (MAXIMUM PENALTY (Failure to appear in Class B or Class C felony case)-Five (5) years imprisonment and/or a $10,000 fine pursuant to RCW 9A. 76.170 and RCW 9A.20.021(1 )(c), plus restitution and assessments.)

JIS Code: 9A.76.170.3C Bail Jump B or C Felony

contrary to the form ofthe Statute in such cases made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State of Washington.

DATED at Ephrata, Washington,

Edward A. Owens, WSBA #29387 Chief Deputy Prosecuting Attorney

' ' '

Renee s. Townsley Clerk/A dministrt1Jor

(509) 456-3082 TDD #1-80()..833-6388

E~mail Garth Louis Dano Edward Asa Owens Grant County Prosecutor's Office PO Box 37 Ephrata, WA 98823M0037

CASE # 325598

The Court of Appeals of the

500 N Cedar ST Spokane, WA 9920J.J905

State of Washington Division Ill

Fax: (509) 456-4288 http://www.courls. wa.gov/courl.f

January 26, 2016

E-mail Kristina M. Nichols Nichols Law Firm, PLLC PO Box 19203 Spokane, WA 99219~9203

State of Washington v. Matthew Simon Garoutte GRANT COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT No. 131004201

Counsel:

Enclosed please find a copy of the opinion filed by the Court today.

A party need not file a motion for reconsideration as a prerequisite to discretionary review by the Supreme Court. RAP 13.3(b); 13.4(a). If a motion for reconsideration is filed, it should state with particularity the points of law or fact which the moving party contends the court has overlooked or misapprehended, together with a brief argument on the points raised. RAP 12.4(c). Motions for reconsideration which merely reargue the case should not be filed.

Motions for reconsideration, if any, must be filed within twenty (20) days after the filing of the opinion. Please file an original and two copies of the motion. If no motion for reconsideration. is filed, any petition for review to the Supreme Court must be filed in this court within thirty (30) days after the filing of this opinion (may be filed by electronic facsimile transmission). The motion for reconsideration and petition for review must be received (not mailed) on or before the dates they are due. RAP 18.5(c).

RST:jab En c.

c: E-mail-Hen. John D. Knodell

c: Matthew Simon Garoutte #840189 P.O. Box 769 Connell, WA 99326

Sincerely,

~>du~fl Renee S. Townsley Clerk/Administrator

FILED JANUARY 26, 2016

In the Office of the Clerk of Court W A State Court of Appeals, Division III

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE


Respondent,

v.

MATTHEW S. GAROUTTE,

Appellant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 32559-8-III

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

SIDDOWAY, C.J.- Matthew Garoutte was convicted of possession of a controlled

substance (methamphetamine) and bail jumping following a unitary trial in which he

waived jury trial on the possession of a controlled substance count and tried only the bail

jumping count to the jury.

He appeals his conviction.for bail jumping, contending (l) his right to an impartial

jury was violated when issues of alleged bias on the part ofuyo jurors arose after voir

dire and the court denied both a motion tor mistrial and a request to substitute alternate

jurors, and (2) irrelevant and unduly prejudicial evidence of his arrest for the bail

No. 32559-8-III State v. Garoutte

jumping charge was admitted in error. In a pro se statement of additional grounds, he

complains of a violation of his right to a speedy trial and that the amended information

omitted an essential element of bail jumping. We find no error or abuse of discretion and

affirm.

FACTSANDPROCEDURALBACKGROUND

Matthew Garoutte was arrested on April 3, 2013, on an outstanding .Depattment of

Corrections warrant. At the time of his arrest, Mr. Garoutte was sitting in a friend's

pickup truck. A backpack was in the bed of the truck.

After Mr. Garoutte's arrest, the owner of the pickup truck contacted police and

told them the backpack did not belong to him. Officers logged the backpack into

evidence and inventoried its contents, which were found to include a glass smoking pipe

containing residue that proved to be methamphetamine.

A few days later, Mr. Garoutte traveled to the police department to retrieve the

backpack, whiCh he claimed belonged to him. The police returned everything but the

pipe. In light of Mr. Garoutte's self .. proclaimed ownership of the backpack, the State

charged him with one count of possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine).

On August 20,2013, Mr. Garoutte was arraigned and the court set release

conditions and scheduled the omnibus hearing in his case for October 8. Mr. Garoutte

failed to appear for the omnibus hearing. A bench warrant was issued, and the State

2


amended the information to add a count of bail jumping. A Grant County deputy sheriff

arre~ted Mr. Garoutte on January 18, 2014, on a failure to appear warrant.

Mr. Garoutte waived a jury trial on the possession of a controlled substance count

but not on the bail jumping count. The case proceeded to a unitary jury trial where

evidence was presented on both counts. The court informed the jury it was to consider

only the bail jumping count.

After voir dire, and during the parties' exercise of their peremptory challenges, the

trial judge told the lawyers that juror 9 lived across the street from him. Juror 9 was not

stricken by either party.

After jury selection was completed, Mr. Garoutte moved for a mistrial based on

the disclosed relationship between juror 9 and the trial judge, arguing that he had been

denied effective assistance of counsel because he had been unable to explore the

relationship in voir dire. In denying the motion, the judge elaborated a bit more on his

relationship with juror 9, stating that he and juror 9 and their respective daughters had

been friends for many years, but emphasizing that he and juror 9 had never discussed Mr.

Garoutte's case. He also stated, "I don't know of any reason why my acquaintance with

[juror 9] would disqualify him, and I don't know of any reason why counsel could not,

frankly, ask the entire panel whether they knew me or were acquainted with me." Report

of Proceedings (RP) at 61.

3


On the morning after the jury was selected, Mr. Garoutte~s lawyer reiterated his

concern about juror 9 and suggested that the trial court replace juror 9 with one of the

alternate jurors. The trial court responded that it would take the suggestion under

advisement.

The court then informed the lawyers that, on a related note, the county's deputy

clerk, Marla Webb, who the State planned to call as a witness on the bail jumping charge,

had informed the court that morning that she and juror 8, who had also been seated on the

jury, were next-door neighbors. Although prospective jurors had been read the names of

witnesses including Ms. Webb, juror 8 had not disclosed that she knew Ms. Webb. The

trial court told the parties, "[W]e don't need to take care of that now. But I'll let you

stew on that a little bit. We'll talk about that later." RP at 71.

The State called Ms. Webb to testify in its case-in-chief. She testified that Mr.

Garoutte was present in court on August 20, 2013, the day on which the October 8

omnibus hearing was scheduled. It called Douglas Mitchell, a former Grant County

deputy prosecutor who handled Mr. Garoutte's arraignment on August 20. He testified

that Mr. Garoutte was present in court that day and that the court had read aloud the

release conditions included in its August 20 order. The State also called Deputy Jacob

Fisher, who had arrested Mr. Garoutte in January 2014 on the failure to appear warrant.

Over Mr. Garoutte's objection that the testimony was irrelevant and prejudicial, the State

elicited the deputy's testimony about the fact and the timing of that arrest.

4

No: 32559-8-III State v. Garoutte

The State offered and the court admitted certified copies of the criminal minute

sheet from August 20, 2013, indicating the omnibus hearing was set for October 8, 2013;

a: crhnina1 case scheduling order requiring Mr. Garoutte to be in court on October 8,

2013; an order setting conditions for release, unsigned by Mr. Garoutte, requiring Mr.

Garoutte to appear in court on October 8, 2013; and a bench warrant commanding Mr.

Garoutte's arrest.

Before jury deliberations, Mr. Garoutte renewed his request that the trial court

replace juror 9 with an alternate juror and added a request that juror 8 be replaced with an

alternate juror as well. The trial court offered to question juror 8 regarding her

relationship with Ms. Webb, but Mr. Garoutte declined the offer. The court then refused

the request for substitution, stating, 441 don't think there's a legal basis in eithet case at

this point to substitute the jurors in." RP at 273.

The trial court found Mr. Garoutte guilty of possession of a controlled substance

(methamphetamine) and the jury found Mr. Garoutte guilty of bail jumping. Mr.

Garoutte appeals. 1

1 Among Mr. Garoutte's assignments of error in his opening brief was the trial court's failure to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law on the possession of a controlled substance count. Before scheduling the appeal for hearing, this court directed the State to procure the entry of written findings of fact and conclusions of law and supplement the clerk's papers, which was done.

5

No. 32559-8-IH State v. Garoutte

ANALYSIS

I. Impartial jury

Mr. Garoutte's first assignment of error is to the trial court's denial of both his

motion for a mistrial and his subsequent request that the court replace juror 8 and juror 9

with alternate jurors before submitting the case to the jury for deliberation. Mr. Garoutte

contends that the relationships of juror 8 and juror 9 to individuals involved in the tria\

indicate "bias" that he was unable to explore. Br. of Appellant at 11.

Both the United States and Washington State Constitutions provide a right to trial

by an impartial jury, which "requires a trial by an unbiased and unprejudiced jury, free of

disqualifying jury misconduct.'~ State v. Boiko, 138 Wn. App. 256, 260, 156 PJd 934

(2007); U.S. CONST. amend. VI; CONST. art. 1, § 21. RCW 2.36.110 provides:

It shaH be the duty of a judge to excuse from further jury service any juror, who in the opinion of the judge, has manifested unfitness as a juror by reason of bias, prejudice, indifference, inattention or any physical or mental defect or by reason of conduct or practices incompatible with proper and efficient jury service.

CrR 6.5 states, '"If at any time before submission of the case to the jury a juror is found

unable to perform the duties the court shall order the juror discharged." RCW 2.36.110

and CrR 6.5 impose on the trial court a continuing·obligation to excuse any juror who is

unfitto serve on the jury. State v. Jorden, 103 Wn. App. 221, 227, 11 P.3d 866 (2000).

A juror must be excused for either actual or implied bias. Kuhn v. Schnall, 155

Wn. App. 560, 574, 228 P.3d 828 (2010). Actual bias requires "the existence of a state of

6

No~ 32559-8-III State v. Garoutte

mind on the part of the juror in reference to the action, or to either party, which satisfies

the court that the challenged person cannot try the issue impartially and without prejudice

to the substantial rights of the party challenging.'~ RCW 4.44.170(2). Implied bias

requires u'the existence of the facts [that) in judgment of law disqualifies the juror."'

kuhn~ 15.5 ·wn. App. at 574 (alteration in original) (quoting RCW 4.44.170(1)). RCW

4.44.180 provides four bases for a challenge for implied bias: consanguinity to a party,

certain relationships to a party such as landlord and tenant, having served as a juror in a

case with substantially the same facts, and interest in the event of the action or the

principal question.

When Mr. Garoutte moved the trial court for a mistrial on account ofits

relationship with juror 9, the court and the lawyers discussed the fact that the court~s

disclosure of the relationship had been made while the parties were exercising their

peremptory challenges. The record does not indicate precisely when in the course of that

process the disclosure was made. "A party accepting a juror without exercising its

available challenges cannot later challenge that juror's inclusion." State v. Reid, 40 Wn.

App. 319~ 322, 698 P.2d 588 (1985) (citing State v. Jahns, 61 Wash. 636, 112 P. 747

(1911). If the disclosure was made when Mr. Garoutte had not exhausted his peremptory

challenges, he should not be heard to complain at all about juror 9's service. Not

knowing whether that was the case, we analyze his challenge to juror 9 further.

7


None of the four statutory bases for implied bias exist in the case of juror 8 or

juror 9. Turning to Mr. Garoutte's charge of actual bias on the part of the jurors, a party

challenging a juror for actual bias must show such bias by a preponderance of the

evidence. Ottis v. Stevenson-Carson Sch. Dist. No. 303, 61 Wn. App. 747, 754, 812 P.2d

133 (1991). To show bias, the party ""must show more than a mere possibility that the

juror was prejudiced.''' State v. Noltie, 116 Wn .2d 831, 840, 809 P .2d 190 ( 1991)

(emphasis omitted) (quoting 14 LEWIS H. ORLAND & KARL B. TEGLAND, WASHINGTON

PRACTICE: TRIAL PRACTICE CIVIL§ 202 (4th ed. 1986)).

Mr. Garoutte does not point to any evidence of actual bias on the part of the two

jurors. He merely speculates that, because juror 8 lived next door to Ms. Webb, the juror

was biased. See State v. Tingdale, 117 Wn.2d 595, 601, 817 P.2d 850 (1991) ("A juror's

acquaintance with a party, by itself, is ~ot grounds for a challenge for cause."). The same

is true with juror 9. Mr. Garoutte's real complaint appears to be his view that he was

deprived of an opportunity to explore the possibility of bias through voir dire. A trial

court's abuse of its discretion over the scope and content of voir dire that substantially

prejudices the rights of an accused implicates the constitutional right to fair trial and can

be addressed on appeal. State v. Davis, 141 Wn.2d 798, 826, 10 P.3d 977 (2000).

Here, however, the trial court is not accused of limiting the scope and content of

voir dire. As the trial court noted, if the defense thought that a prospective juror's

acquaintance with the trial judge could give rise to bias, it could have explored that

8


during voir dire. But ordinarily, a juror's acquaintance with the judge should not cut in

favor of one party or the other. As the State points out, a trial judge is not a party to the ' ': .

case, does not provide testimony, strives for neutrality, and even instructs the jury, as the

trial court did here:

Our state constitution prohibits a trial judge from making a comment on the evidence. It would be improper for me to express, by words or conduct, my personal opinion about the value of testimony or other

·· evidence. I have not intentionally done this. If it appeared to you that I have indicated my personal opinion in any way, either during trial or in giving these instructions, you must disregard this entirely.

RP at 277.

Appellate courts review a trial court's decision whether to remove a juror for an

abuse of discretion. State v. Elmore, 155 Wn.2d. 758, 768, 123 P.3d 72 (2005). Because

no bias is demonstrated, the trial court did not abuse its discretion. Since a motion for a

mistrial should be granted "only when the defendant has been so prejudiced that nothing

short of a new trial can insure that the defendant will be tried fairly," Mr. Garoutte's

motion for mistrial was properly denied as well. State v. Lewis~ 130 Wn.2d 700, 707, 927

P.2d 235 (1996) (noting a trial court is in the best position to discern prejudice).

The trial court was also in no way responsible for the delayed revelation that juror

8 was a neighbor of Ms. Webb. In the case of juror 8, not only was Mr. Garoutte free to

explore potential jurors' relationships with witnesses, but jurors were actually provided

with Ms. Webb's name and asked to indicate if they knew her-juror 8 either didn't

9


know Ms. Webb, didn't know her by name, or misled the court as well as the lawyers.

Misconduct can arise where a juror fails to speak during voir dire regarding a material

fact. Kuhn, 155 Wn. App. at 573. But to complain of juror misconduct, "a party must

show the juror failed to answer honestly where a correct response would have provided a

valid basis for a challenge for cause." ld. Mr. Garoutte does not allege misconduct nor

show that a correct response would have supported a challenge for cause. In any event,

the trial court afforded Mr. Garoutte the opportunity to examine juror 8 and he declined.

Any challenge was waived. See State v. Clark, 34 Wash. 485,492, 76 P. 98 (1904)

(finding no error where the appellant had the opportunity to examine jurors but failed or

refused to do so).

II. Evidentiary error

Mr. Garoutte next argues that the trial court erred in admitting evidence ofMr.

Garoutte's January 18, 2014 arrest. He contends the evidence was irrelevant and that any

limited relevance it might have had was outweighed by its unduly prejudicial character.

He argues that admission of the evidence was not harmless because the evidence that Mr.

Garoutte was aware of his obligation to appear at an orimibus hearing on October 8 was

not strong, since his signature did not appear on the August 20 order setting conditions

for release.

Appellate courts review a trial court's decision regarding evidence admissibility

for an abuse of discretion. State v. Aguilar, 153 Wn. App. 265, 273,223 P.3d 1158

10


(2009). Only relevant evidence is admissible at trial. ER 402. Relevant evidence is

"evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence

to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without

the evidence.'' ER 401. "The threshold to admit relevant evidence is very low[;] [e]ven

minimally relevant evidence is admissible." State v. Darden, 145 Wn.2d 612, 621,41

P.3d 1189 (2002). Relevant evidence may be excluded "if its probative value is

substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice." ER 403.

To prove the crime of bail jumping, the State ha~ to prove that Mr. Garoutte had

knowledge of the requirement that he appear at the omnibus hearing on October 8 and

failed to appear as required. RCW 9A.76.170(1).

The relevance of Mr. Garoutte's arrest in January 2014 advanced by the State was

that Mr. Garoutte's last appearance on the possession of a controlled substance charge

had been on August 20-five months earlier-and a reasonable person charged with such

a crime would have realized well before January 18 that he must have missed a court

appearance. As the trial court noted:

Well, it seems to me if he's gone for four months and he makes no attempt to get back in front of the court, which I think is a rational inference from what happened here, I think that supports the notion that his failure to appear back before the court is not simply because he didn't know what date, because a reasonable person under the circumstances would have made some inquiry within four months, and after the trial date passes, I think that supports that notion.

RP at 236. We agree with the State and the trial court that the evidence was relevant.

11


Mr. Garoutte also argues that any relevance of the arrest was outweighed by unfair

prejudice, but without identifying the unfair prejudice. The event occurring during the

arrest that principally concerned Mr. Garoutte in objecting was that he gave police a false

name at the time of his arrest-evidence that was excluded by the trial court. G·iven the

charge of bail jumping, evidence that a warrant issued and that Mr. Garoutte was arrested

is unsurprising and is not unduly prejudicial. And given that the August 20 order setting

conditions of release was unsigned by Mr. Garoutte, the probative value of evidence that

the State arrested him to obtain his seriously belated appearance on the controlled

substance charge outweighed whatever small stigma might be associated with arrest.

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL GROUNDS

In a prose statement of additional grounds (SAG), Mr. Garoutte raises two. He

argues that his right to a speedy trial under CrR 3.3 and the Washington Constitution was

violated where the 60-day speedy trial period expired on March 21,2014, without trial.

He argues that while the trial court allowed the State to release him in order to extend his

speedy trial period, it did so too late, and alternatively abused its discretion in doing so

because there was no good cause to continue the trial.

He also argues that the information filed on the bail jumping charge is insufficient

where it identifies only the cause number of the case in which he had failed to appear

without identifYing the crime charged in that criminal case. We address the issues in

turn.

12


Speedy trial. The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution and article

(section 22 offhe Washington State Constitution guarantee a defendant the right to a

speedy trial. State v. Saunders, 153 Wn. App. 209, 216~ 220 P.3d 1238 (2009). But CrR

3.3(b)(l)(i)'s requirement oftrial within 60 days when the defendant is in custody "'is

riot a constitutional mandate."' ld. at 216-17 (quoting State v. Carson, 128 Wn.2d 805,

821, 912 P.2d 1016 (1996)). Pretrial release decisions are reviewed for an abuse of

discretion. State v. Johnson~ 105 Wn.2d 92, 96,711 P.2d 1017 (1986).

We are unable to address Mr. Garoutte's contention that he was in custody for

longer than 60 days without trial because the record on appeal does not contain any of the

records necessary to evaluate a speedy trial issue. Mr. Garoutte attached a jail time

certitication to his SAG, but under RAP 10.3(a)(8) this court does not review appendix

material not contained in the record. The appropriate means of raising matters requiring

evidence not included in the record on appeal is through the filing of a personal restraint

petition. State v. McFarland, 127 Wn.2d 322, 335,899 P.2d 1251 (1995).

Turning to Mr. Garoutte's complaint about his release, State v. Kelly, 60 Wn. App.

921,925, 808 P.2d 1150 (1991) addressed the issue being raised by Mr. Garoutte:

14Whether the trial court may release an in-custody defendant before the expiration of the

60-day speedy trial period in order to extend the time during which trial must be held."

The Kelly court held ( 1) a release from custody properly extends the time for trial and (2)

a judge can consider such circumstances as the trial calendar and the availability of

13

No. 32559~8-III State v. Garoutte

witnesses when deciding pretrial release. Jd. at 926, 928. Given the decision in Kelly,

the trial judge did not abuse his discretion by releasing Mr. Garoutte to extend the time

for trial.

Insufficient information. "An information must contain [a]ll essential elements of

a crime." State v. Green, 101 Wn. App. 885, 889, 6 PJd 53 (2000) (alteration in

original) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting State v. Kjorsvik, 117 Wn.2d 93, 97,

812 P.2d (1991)). In bail jumping, the underlying offense is an essential element ofthe

crime. ld.

When a charging document is challenged for the first time on appeal, as is the case

here, it must be construed liberally; we need only determine if the necessary facts appear

hi any form in the charging document. State v. Williams, 162 Wn.2d 177, 185, 170 PJd

30 (2007). In this case, the State's amended infonnation, filed in Grant County Superior

Court Cause No. 13-l-00420-1, charged the underlying crime, possession of

methamphetamine, as count one. It charged bail jumping as count two, stating that the

charge was based on his "fail[ure] to appear ... in which a Class B or Class C felony has

been filed, to~wit: Grant County Superior Court [c]ause [n]o. 13-1-00420-1; contrary to

Revised Code of Washington 9A.76.170." Clerk's Papers at 22. Here, the charging

document is sufficient because, within the single amended information, the State both

identified the crime of unlawful possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine)

and alleged a corresponding felony 'bail jumping violation. This is not a case in which

14

No. 32559-S~III State v. Garoutte

Mr. Garoutte was required to search for rules, regulations, or a case file in order to

discover the underlying charge. It is plain from page two of the amended information

that the-underlying offense appears on page one.

Affirmed.

A majority of the panel has detennined this opinion will not be printed in the

Washington Appellate Reports, but it will be filed for public record pursuant to RCW

2.06.040.

WE CONCUR:

Brown, J.• Lawrence-Berrey, J.

*Judge Stephen M. Brown was a member of the Court of Appeals at the time argument was heard on this matter. He is now serving as a judge pro tempore of the court pursuant to RCW 2.06.150.

15

' '

We'stl~w. 10 PJd 504

102 Wash.App. 907, 10 P.3d 504

(Cite as: 102 Wash.App. 907, to P.3d 504)

c

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division I.

STATE of Washington, Appellant, v.

Christopher LOG AN, Respondent.

No. 44529-4-I.

Oct. 16, 2000.

State appealed from order of the Superior Court, King County, Joan DuBuque, J., dismissing assault charges against defendant on speedy trial grounds. The Court of Appeals, Webster, J., held that speedy trial rule's "revoca

tion of release" provision did not apply to extend speedy

trial period from 60 to 90 days.

Aftirmed.

West Headnotes

Ill Criminal Law 110 ~577.11(1)

II 0 Criminal Law llOXVI II Time ofT rial

Time

llOXVHI(B) Decisions Subsequent to 1966 110k577.ll Status of Persons Affecting Trial

110k577.t l(l) k. In General; Confinement.

Most Cited Cases

Speedy trial rule's "revocation of release" provision did not apply to extend speedy trial period from 60 to 90 days, where defendant remained in custody from the date of his arraignment in superior court on second and third degree assault charges, was never released, and no court order revoking his release was entered, although defendant had previously been arraigned in municipal court on tburth

Page I

degree assault charges arising from same incident, then

released on his own recognizance. CrR 3 .3( d)(l ).

121 Criminal Law 110 ~1139

110 Criminal Law llOXXIV Review

11 OXXIV(L) Scope of Review in General 11 OXXIV (L) 13 Review De Novo

11 Okll39 k. In General. Most Cited Cases

The application of a court rule to particular facts is a question of law reviewable de novo.

[3) Criminal Law 110 ~577.11(1)

110 Criminal Law !IOXVIII Time of Trial

II OXVlli(B) Decisions Subsequent to 1966 11 Ok5 77.11 Status of Persons Affecting Trial

Time II Ok577 .II (I) k. In General; Confinement.

Most Cited Cases

Speedy trial rule's 60-day speedy trial period for defendants not released from jail pending trial applies to municipal courts. CrR 3.3(d)(l ).

141 Criminal Law 110 ~1130(5)

110 Criminal Law llOXXIV Review

IIOXXIV(I) Briefs II Ok 1130 In General

II Ok1130(5) k. Points and Authorities. Most Cited Cases

Where no authorities are cited in support of a propo-

© 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

00077

-tO P.3d 504 102 Wash.App. 907, 10 P.3d 504

(Cite as: lOi Wash.App. 907, 10 P.3d 504)

sition, the court is not required to search out authorities, but may assume that counsel, after diligent search, has found

none.

**504 *908 James .M. Whisman, King County Dep. Prosecutor, Seattle, for Appellant.

Michael Danko, Seattle, for Respondent.

WEBSTER, J. The. State. appeals the trial court's dismissal of the

charges against Christopher Logan for a violation of his

right to ·a speedy trial. Because the speedy trial period had expired, we affirm.-

FACTS In the early morning of January 1, 1999, Christopher

Logan struck Forrest DeWitt several times in the face. DeWitt's it~ury required reconstructive surgery; two tita· t1itlh1.plates were placed in his face to repair the damage.

On January I, 1999, the City of Seattle charged Logan

Page 2

with two counts of fourth degree assault. On January 4, 1999, he was arraigned and entered pleas of not guilty. He was released on his personal recognizance.

A pretrial hearing was scheduled for January 26, 1999. On that date, Logan obtained a **505 continuance of the pretrial hearing to February 8, 1999 and entered a 14 day waiver of speedy trial.

After the seriousness of DeWitt's injuries became clear, on March 3, 1999, the fourth degree assault charges were dismissed and the King County Prosecuting Attorney *909 charged Logan with one count of second degree assault and one count of third degree assault. On March 9,

1999, Logan was arrested and arraigned on the new felony charges.

On March 24, 1999, Logan, still in custody, filed a motion to dismiss for violation of speedy trial.

The chronology of events relevant to the speedy trial issue is as follows:

January I, 1999

January 4, 1999

Complaint tiled in Seattle Municipal court; Logan in custody

Logan arraigned and released

January 26 to February 8, 1999

March 3, 1999

14 day speedy trial waiver

Municipal case dismissed without prejudice; information tiled in King County Superior Court

Logan Arrested March 8, 1999

March ll, 1999

March 23, 1999

March 25, 1999

Logan Arraigned-remains in custody

Case Scheduling Hearing

Dismissal Granted

Logan's motion to dismiss for failure to bring him to trial within the speedy trial period was heard by Judge DuBuque on March 25, 1999. The trial court indicated that the defendant's speedy trial time expired before the case ever got to case setting. The court then entered an order dismissing the charges with prejudice.

The State appeals, contending that Judge DuBuque's dismissal should be reversed.

*910 DISCUSSION [1] The State argues that the trial court erred in failing

to apply the "revocation of release" provisions of CrR


00078

10 P.3d 504

102 Wash.App. 907, I 0 P .3d 504

(Cite as: 102 Wash.App. 907, 10 P.3d 504)

3.3(d)(J) to extend the speedy trial period from 60 to 90

days. CrR 3 .3( d)( I) applies to detendants who have been released from custody pending trial, but whose release is revoked by order of the court. Because Logan remained in custody t!·om the date of his arraignment in Superior Court, and was never released, CrR 3 .3( d)( I) does not apply to this case.

[2] The application of a court rule to particular facts is a question of law reviewable de novo. State v. Carlyle, 84 Wash.App. 33, 35, 925 P.2d 635 (1996). CrR 3.3(c)(2) reads in pertinent part as follows:

A defendant not released from jail pending trial shall be brought to trial not later than 60 days after the date of

arraignment, less time elapsed in district court. A de

fendant released from jail whether or not subjected to conditions of release pending trial shall be brought to trial not later than 90 days after the date of arraignment, less time elapsed in district court.

[3] 'Time elapsed in district court' means ... if at the time

a complaint is filed with the district court a defendant is detained injail or subjected to conditions of release, time elapsed in district court commences on the date the

complaint is tiled.

CrR 3.3(c)(2)(i) and (ii). The mle applies to municipal

courts. State v. Duffy, 86 W ash.App. 334, 343, 936 P .2d

444 (1997). Failure to bring a criminal charge to trial

within the applicable time period will result in the charge being dismissed with prejudice. CrR 3)(i).

Logan was detained in jail following the filing of

charges in Superior Court. Thus, his trial should have been scheduled within 60 days of his arraignment in Superior Court, less time elapsed in Municipal Court. Logan was in

jail when the complaint was filed in the Municipal Court,

so *911 time elapsed in Municipal Court commenced on January l, \999. Logan was charged on January 1, 1999

Page 3

and the charges were dismissed March 3, 1999, a total of 62 days. Application of the 14-day waiver results in 48

days of speedy trial time having elapsed in municipal court. Thus, applying the 60-day mle, the State had until March 23 (12 days from arraignment) to bring Logan to

trial.

**506 [4) Both parties concede that Logan was not

brought to trial within the 60-day time period. Nevertheless, the State argues that the "revocation of release" provisions of CrR 3 .3( d)( 1) operate to extend the speedy trial period from 60 to 90 days where, as here, a detendant is in and out of custody. The State's argument, while creative, is

meritless and not supported by decisional or statutory law.FNI CrR 3.3(d)(l) applies to defendants who have been

released from custody pending trial, but whose release is

revoked by order of the court. This situation is not present here. Logan remained in custody from the date of his arraignment in Superior Court. He was never released, nor was a court order entered revoking his release. Therefore, CrR 3.3(d)(J) docs not apply to this case.

FN I. The State cites no authority to support its

argument. "Where no authorities are cited in

support of a proposition, the court is not required to search out authorities, but may assume that

counsel, after diligent search, has found none." Defleer v. Seall!e Post-lnte!ligencer, 60 Wash.2d

122, 126, 372 P.2d !93 (1962). While the State

cites State_v. Kel{l•,_60_Wash.App. 921, 808_P.

2d_1150 ( .1991) and Stare v. Hyall. 78 Wash.App.

679, 898 P.2d 362 (1995), neither case supports

the State's argument. Both cases involved de

fendants who were released pending trial, a cmcial fact which is not present in this case.

The State would have this Court believe that there is a provision in CrR 3.3 which provides that, so long as a defendant spends less than 60 days in custody, he may be

tried within 90 days of arraignment. A thorough and ex

haustive search of the rule reveals no such provision. While the State urges this court to "harmonize" the speedy


00079

.lO P.3d 504 102 Wash.App. 907, 10 P.3d 504 (Cite as: 102 Wnsh.App. 907, 10 P.3d 504)

tr,illl..ll!les, no .ham1oniza)ion is necessary. The application

o,f tpe plain. language of the rule mandates dismissal in this cas.e. ·.

The Supreme Court held over two decades ago, "unless a *912 strict rule is applied, the right to a speedy trial

as well as the integrity of the judicial process, cmmot be

effective:ly preserved." Swte v. Striker, 87 Wash.2d 870, 877, 557 P :2d 84 7 ( 197 6). The State argues against this

strict application of tile speedy trial rules, contending that

complying with them is a constant struggle. But as one

C~lifornia court observed, "We long ago learned, from our

Anglo Saxon jurisprudential history, that the crown does not win or lose a case, it merely sees that justice is done. The primary function of the office of prosecutor is to diligently and vigilantly pursue those who are believed to have violated the criminal codes of the state." People v. Hartman, 170 Cal.App.3d 572, 216 Cai.Rptr. 641, 648-49

( 1985). The remedy of dismissal exists to ensure that justice is done and that the State is diligent in prosecuting

defendants. The trial court did not err in dismissing the. charges based on its conclusion that the speedy trial period

had expired.

We affinn.

Wash.App. Div. I ,2000. State v. Logan

102 Wash.App. 907, 10 P.3d 504

END OF DOCUMENT


00080

Page 4

c. o. alo. 3 t.s--s--9 - :m - washington petition for review.pdf · tzc.vii!:vv 71-ll:c i)iccjs/on...

Documents