c d e sg231 rbe snu1079 ssp25 mmnk1 cclp-1 ccsw1 …...cclp-1 icc13-7 icc15 icc16 icc17 icc2 icc4...

4
pFRS2 Y196 Debio1347 TAS-120 BGJ398 ICC13-7 FRS2 pSHP2 Y542 SHP2 pMEK1/2 S217/221 MEK1/2 pERK1/2 T202/Y204 ERK1/2 Supplemental Figure 1 OPTN Exon 9 Exon 17 FGFR2 Chr10 q26.13 p13 5’ 3’ C T C AC AA CC AA T G A GG AA GG A G AA G C A G A A Glu Asn Thr Leu 764 765 766 767 768 185 186 187 188 189 Thr Glu Ala Gly Glu Glu OPTN FGFR2 KIAA1217 Exon 7 Exon 17 FGFR2 Chr10 q26.13 p12.2 5’ 1 768 283 1943 amino acid 3’ A ICC13-7 F G 1.5 CCLP-1 Relative Expression 1.0 0.5 0 FGFR1 FGFR1b FGFR1c FGFR2 FGFR3 Relative Expression 1.5 FGF20 expression 1.0 0.5 0 CCLP-1 HuCCT1 SNU1079 SSP25 RBE ICC13-7 FGFR1 SG231 RBE SNU1079 SSP25 MMNK1 CCLP-1 CCSW1 Huh-28 ICC2 ICC4 β-actin B E D C pFRS2 Y196 FRS2 β-actin CCLP-1 ICC13-7 ICC15 ICC16 ICC17 ICC2 ICC4 HuCCT1 SSP25 SG231 MMNK1 RBE SNU1079 Huh-28 short long

Upload: others

Post on 08-Feb-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • pFRS2 Y196

    Debio1347TAS-120BGJ398ICC13-7

    FRS2pSHP2 Y542

    SHP2pMEK1/2 S217/221

    MEK1/2pERK1/2 T202/Y204

    ERK1/2

    Supplemental Figure 1

    OPTNExon 9Exon 17

    FGFR2

    Chr10q26.13 p13

    5’ 3’

    C T C ACA A C CA A T G A G G A AG G A G A A G C AG A AGluAsnThrLeu

    764 765 766 767 768 185 186 187 188 189Thr GluAlaGlyGlu Glu

    OPTNFGFR2

    KIAA1217

    Exon 7Exon 17

    FGFR2

    Chr10q26.13 p12.2

    5’1 768 283 1943 amino acid

    3’

    A ICC13-7

    F G

    1.5 CCLP-1

    Rel

    ativ

    e Ex

    pres

    sion

    1.0

    0.5

    0

    FGFR

    1

    FGFR

    1b

    FGFR

    1c

    FGFR

    2

    FGFR

    3

    Rel

    ativ

    e Ex

    pres

    sion 1.5 FGF20 expression

    1.0

    0.5

    0

    CC

    LP-1

    HuC

    CT1

    SNU

    1079

    SSP2

    5

    RBE

    ICC

    13-7

    FGFR1

    SG23

    1R

    BESN

    U10

    79SS

    P25

    MM

    NK1

    CC

    LP-1

    CC

    SW1

    Huh

    -28

    ICC

    2IC

    C4

    β-actin

    B

    EDC

    pFRS2 Y196

    FRS2

    β-actin

    CC

    LP-1

    ICC

    13-7

    ICC

    15IC

    C16

    ICC

    17IC

    C2

    ICC

    4H

    uCC

    T1SS

    P25

    SG23

    1M

    MN

    K1R

    BESN

    U10

    79H

    uh-2

    8

    short

    long

  • Supplementary Figure S1. Characterization of FGFR-driven ICC models

    A, Immunoblot of lysates from the indicated biliary tract cancer cell lines and immortalized bile

    duct cells (MMNK-1). The two FGFR inhibitor sensitive ICC cell lines, CCLP-1 and ICC13-7 (red),

    show constitutive FRS2-Y196 phosphorylation.

    B, Structure of FGFR2-OPTN chromosomal fusion in ICC13-7 cells.

    C-E, Examination of FGF pathway components in CCLP-1 cells. C, Immunoblot for FGFR1 in

    lysates from a set of human biliary tract cancer cell lines, including CCLP-1. MMNK-1 cells are

    shown as a reference. D, qRT-PCR analysis showing that FGFR1 is expressed as the IIIc isoform

    in CCLP-1 cells. E, Results of qRT-PCR analysis showing FGF20 overexpression in CCLP-1

    cells.

    F, Immunoblot showing dose-response of the indicated FGFR inhibitors on downstream signaling

    pathways (dose range: BGJ398: 0.4 nM-250 nM, TAS-120: 0.08-50 nM, Debio1347: 8 nm-5000

    nM; for each drug, doses were increased at 5-fold increments).

    G, Structure of the FGFR2-KIAA1217 chromosomal fusion in the MG69 PDX model.

  • pFRS2 Y196

    ParentEmpty vector

    300 nM Debio1347

    75 nM TAS-120

    75 nM BGJ398

    ICC13-7

    FRS2pSHP2 Y542

    SHP2pMEK1/2 S217/221

    MEK1/2pERK1/2 T202/Y204

    ERK1/2β-actin

    FGFR2-PHGDH WT

    FGFR2-PHGDH V565F

    FGFR2-PHGDH L618V

    FGFR2-PHGDH K660M

    FGFR2-PHGDH K715R

    -

    -

    -

    +

    -

    -

    -

    -

    +

    -

    +

    -

    -

    -

    -

    +

    -

    -

    -

    -

    +

    -

    +

    -

    -

    -

    -

    +

    -

    -

    -

    -

    +

    -

    +

    -

    -

    -

    -

    +

    -

    -

    -

    -

    +

    -

    +

    -

    -

    -

    -

    +

    -

    -

    -

    -

    +

    -

    +

    -

    -

    -

    -

    +

    -

    -

    -

    -

    +

    -

    +

    -

    -

    -

    -

    +

    -

    -

    -

    -

    +

    -

    +

    -

    DMSO

    Parental

    Empty vector

    WT

    V565F

    L618V

    K660M

    K715R

    ICC13-7

    FGFR

    2-PH

    GD

    H

    75nM

    BGJ3

    98

    75nM

    TAS-

    120

    300n

    M De

    bio13

    47

    Emptyvector

    DMSOCCLP-1

    FGFR

    2-PH

    GD

    H

    50 nM

    BGJ3

    98

    50 nM

    TAS-

    120

    200 n

    M De

    bio13

    47

    WT

    V565F

    E566A

    N550K

    N550H

    M538I

    L618V

    K660M

    H683L

    K715R

    Supplemental Figure 2

    A

    F

    B

    E

    D

    C

    FGFR2-PHGDHshort

    longNon-specific

    FGFR2β-actin

    FGFR2β-actin

    Vect

    orW

    TM

    538I

    N55

    0HN

    550K

    V565

    FE5

    66A

    L618

    VK6

    60M

    H68

    3LK7

    15R

    Vect

    orW

    T

    Vect

    orPa

    rent

    al

    WT

    V565

    FL6

    18V

    K660

    MK7

    15R

    CCLP-1

    CCLP-1

    Day 0 Day 14

    ICC13-7

    FGFR2-PHGDH shortlong

    Non-specific

    Non-specific

    Non-specific

    V565F

    M538IN550H

    N550KE566A L618V K660M

    H683L K715R WT

  • Supplementary Figure S2. Activity of FGFR inhibitors against different FGFR2 kinase

    domain mutations in ICC cells

    CCLP-1 cells (A-C) and ICC13-7 cells (D-F) were established to express the FGFR2-PHGDH

    fusion with a WT kinase domain or with the indicated mutations or expressing empty vector

    control. In B-D and F, cells were treated with the indicated FGFR inhibitors or DMSO vehicle. A,

    Immunoblot analysis of lysates of CCLP-1 derivative lines grown in the absence of drug treatment.

    B, Crystal violet staining of CCLP-1 cells after 5 days treatment. C, Pooled CCLP-1 cell clones of

    all FGFR2 fusion variants were grown for 14 days in the absence of drug selection. The individual

    clones were monitored using genomic DNA extracted at day 0 and day 14, using a ddPCR assay

    specific to each mutation. Data are generated from two independent experiments. D, Crystal violet

    staining of ICC13-7 cells after 14 days treatment. E, Immunoblot analysis of lysates from ICC13-

    7 derivative lines grown in the absence of drug treatment. CCLP-1 cell lysates are shown as a

    reference. F, immunoblot analysis of ICC13-7 cells after 6-8 hour treatment.

    All figures for revision v3 6All figures for revision v3 7