by roger c. carson ii operating supervisor, con edison...by roger c. carson ii operating supervisor,...

36
CH4 Connections What’s Going on Underground? By Roger C. Carson II Operating Supervisor, Con Edison 1

Upload: others

Post on 09-Feb-2021

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • CH4 ConnectionsWhat’s Going on Underground?

    By Roger C. Carson II

    Operating Supervisor, Con Edison

    1

  • 2

    Agenda

    • Con Edison Gas System Overview

    • Leak Detection

    • Leak Response Time

    • Gas Leak Backlog Management

    • Leak Pinpointing

    • So What’s Going on Underground?

    • Type 3 Example

    • Type 1 Example

    • Follow Up

  • 3

    Con Edison System Overview

    • System

    – ~ 4300 mi – Distribution

    – ~ 100 mi - Transmission

    • System Materials:

    – Cast Iron (~24%)

    – Steel (~30%)

    • Unprotected (~22%)

    • Protected (~8%)

    – Wrought Iron (Less than 1%)

    – Plastic (~46%)

    • 1.1 Million Customers

    LEGENDTP > 125 PSIG

    HP 15 – 99 PSIG

    MP 2 – 15 PSIG

    LP 4 – 12 in WC

  • 4

    Leak Detection How we Receive leaks

    • Leak Survey

    – Monthly Survey

    – Company/Contractor

    – Heath Detecto-Pak Infrared (DP-IR)

    – Picarro

    – ABB MobileGuard

    • Natural Gas Detector

    • Public

  • 5

    Leak Detection How we Receive leaks

    • Leak Survey

    – Monthly Survey

    – Company/Contractor

    – Heath Detecto-Pak Infrared (DP-IR)

    – Picarro

    – ABB MobileGuard

    • Natural Gas Detector

    • Public

  • 6

    Leak Detection How we Receive leaks

    • Leak Survey

    – Monthly Survey

    – Company/Contractor

    – Heath Detecto-Pak Infrared (DP-IR)

    – Picarro

    – ABB MobileGuard

    • Natural Gas Detector

    • Public

  • 7

    Leak Detection How we Receive leaks

    • Leak Survey

    – Monthly Survey

    – Company/Contractor

    – Heath Detecto-Pak Infrared (DP-IR)

    – Picarro

    – ABB MobileGuard

    • Natural Gas Detector

    • Public

  • Leak Detection (cont.)Public Awareness Campaigns

    8

  • Leak Detection (cont.)

    9

    37%

    63%

    Incoming Leak Source

    Public Company

  • Leak Response Time

    10

    65.60%

    67.70%

    71.90%

    76%76.40%

    78.40%80.20%80.80%80.80%

    81.80%83.55%

    87.57%88.89%

    87.80%88.24%89.10%

    89.96%

    91.95%

    94.10%

    60.00%

    65.00%

    70.00%

    75.00%

    80.00%

    85.00%

    90.00%

    95.00%

    100.00%

    20000

    25000

    30000

    35000

    40000

    45000

    50000

    55000

    60000

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

    30 min response # calls

  • Gas Leak Backlog Management

    11

    0

    1,000

    2,000

    3,000

    4,000

    5,000

    6,000

    7,000

    8,000

    9,000

    10,000

    11,000

    12,000

    2000

    1992 - 2018

    Le

    aks

  • 12

    Gas Leak Backlog Management (cont.)Average time to Repair

  • Gas Leak Backlog Management (cont.)Multi-Faceted Approach

    13

    Efforts: • Monthly mobile

    leak survey• Public awareness

    campaigns• Residential

    methane detectors development and deployment

    Detection Response

    Efforts: • Code MuRRE• Make safe• Isolation valve

    installation program

    • Repair Type 3 leaks

    Prevention

    Efforts:• Main

    replacement program leak prone pipe

    • One-call, Dig safe • Training• Work

    coordination with city utilities

  • Leak Pinpointing Factors to consider to determine leak source

    • Road Conditions

    – Road Composition

    – Soil Type & Moisture

    – Existing Utilities/Crossings

    – Grade

    – Unique Features

    – Vegetation

    • Pipe

    – Material

    – Existing Repairs

    – Pressure

    – Cover

    – Odor

    • Weather

    – Frost

    14

    Asphalt

    Soil

    Asphalt

    Soil

    Concrete

  • So What’s Going on Underground?Wall St and William St

    15

  • So What’s Going on Underground? (cont.)Wall St and William St

    16

  • Type 3 Example

    17

  • Type 3 Example

    18

    GMI

    Pogo

  • Type 3 Example (cont.)

    19

    ~62’

    28%

  • Type 3 Example (cont.)

    20

    ~62’

    28%

  • Type 3 Example (cont.)

    • Main:

    – 10” HPST 1971

    • Road Makeup:

    – Asphalt

    – Concrete

    – Earth

    21

    BarholesTest Point

    0%

    28%

    25%

    15%

    0%

    60%

  • Type 3 Example (cont.)

    • Main:

    – 10” HPST 1971

    • Road Makeup:

    – Asphalt

    – Concrete

    – Earth

    22

    Aerator

    Highest

    Reading

  • Type 3 Example (cont.)

    23

    Highest

    Reading

    4x4

  • Type 3 Example (cont.)

    • Main:

    – 10” HPST 1971

    • Road Makeup:

    – Asphalt

    – Concrete

    – Earth

    24

    • Reason for Leak:

    – Corrosion

    • Repair:

    – Fullseal Clamp

  • TYPE 1 Example

    25

    Manhole 11%

  • TYPE 1 Example

    26

    Manhole 11%

  • Type 1 Example (cont.)

    27

    Potable Water

    Manhole 11%

  • Type 1 Example (cont.)

    28

    Potable Water

  • Type 1 Example (cont.)

    29

    Sustained ~60’s

  • Type 1 Example (cont.)

    • Main:

    – 16” MPCI 1917

    • Road Makeup:

    – Asphalt

    – Concrete

    – Earth/Rock

    • Reason for Leak:

    – Bell & Spigot Joint

    • Repair:

    – Encapsulation

    30

  • Type 1 Example (cont.)

    31

    Potable Water

    Readings

    Clear

  • Type 1 Example (cont.)

    32

    Sustained

    Readings

  • Type 1 Example (cont.)

    • Main:

    – 6” LPCI 1904

    • 1” Steel Riser

    • Road Makeup:

    – Asphalt

    – Concrete

    – Earth/Rock

    • Reason for Leak:

    – Corrosion on Riser

    • Repair:

    – Replace Riser

    33

  • Type 1 Example (cont.)

    34

    Encapsulate

    Joint

    Replace Riser

    Potable Water

  • Follow Up

    35

    • Type 1, 2A/M, 2’s require a recheck of test points

    • After 14 days within 30

    • GDS does the recheck