by: ms. susan m. pojer horace greeley h. s. chappaqua, ny adapted by: mr. reiner kolodinski english...

29
By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitution al Monarchy

Upload: aubrey-heath

Post on 01-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

By: Ms. Susan M. PojerHorace Greeley H. S.

Chappaqua, NY

Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski

By: Ms. Susan M. PojerHorace Greeley H. S.

Chappaqua, NY

Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski

EnglishConstitutionalMonarchy

Page 2: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

The Stuart Monarchy

Page 3: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

James I [r. 1603-1625]– House of StuartMary, Q of Scots son

James I’s speech to the House of Commons:

“I am surprised that my ancestors should ever be permitted such an institution to come into existence. I am a stranger, and found it here when I arrived, so that I am obliged to put up with what I cannot get rid of!”

Attitude = Divine Right!!Star Chamber courts used… no Parliamentary courts…

Page 4: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

James I [r. 1603-1625]• Strong Anglican

– Anti-Puritan– Separatists leave

England…Plymouth Pilgrims

• Anti-Parliament– Customs Duties

imposed ($$) to avoid Parliament

• Catholic alliances• Jamestown, VA…

– Anti-tobacco

Page 5: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

Ship Money Assessments, 1636[per square mile]

What could account for the differences in assessments

(duties / taxes) for the different

regions of the country?

Page 6: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

King James Bible, 1611

Sponsored the

publication of this English

version of the Bible…

Royal Influences

Page 7: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

Charles I [r. 1625-1649]• Anti-Parliament

– Tariffs, duties, taxes and quartering troops

• Petition of Right

– Parliament must approve taxes

– No quartering troops

– No imprisonment without just cause

Page 8: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

The Petition of Rights, 1628

Nicknamed “The Stuart Magna Carta”

Original Magna Carta issued 1215

Against royal abuse of power

Contract between King & Nobles

Limited the power of the King

Guaranteed Rights… Jury, Due Process

Required Parliament’s consent on taxes

Page 9: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

The Many Faces of Charles I

Charles I

by Van Dyck (1633)

Page 10: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

Thomas WentworthEarl of Stafford

• Hired by Charles I to raise money for the crown

• Centralized government

• Sought new revenue sources

• Enforced and extended laws

• Angered Parliament and the people

Page 11: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

Archbishop William Laud

• Forced religious conformity in Britain– Book of Common Prayer– Puritans & Presbyterians

protested

• Scots rebelled… $ req’d

• “Short Parliament”– “Power of the Purse”– Parliament seeks

cooperation– Charles dissolves

Parliament

Page 12: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

The Long Parliament 1640-

1660• Charles I called on Parliament for military

operation funding vs. Scots in rebellion

• Parliament religiously & politically divided

• Parliament suspended royal decrees

• Laud & Wentworth impeached AND executed by Parliament

• Parliament invaded by Charles I & then passes Military Ordinance >> civil war!

Page 13: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

Allegiance of

Members of the Long

Parliament

(1640-1660)

Page 14: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

Civil War (1621-1649)

Royalists(Cavaliers)Royalists

(Cavaliers)Parliamentarians

(Roundheads)Parliamentarians

(Roundheads)

a House of Lords

a N & W England

a Aristocracy

a Large landowners

a Church officials

a More rural, less prosperous

† House of Commons

† S & E England

† Puritans

† Merchants

† Townspeople

† More urban , more prosperous

Page 15: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

Oliver Cromwell [1599-1658]The “Interregnum” Period [1649-1660]† Roundheads prevail in Civil War

† Thomas Hobbes – “Leviathan”

† Oliver Cromwell establishes a Puritan Republic aka Commonwealth (1649-1653)

† Abolished House of Lords, monarchy & official church

† Executed Charles I publicly

† Conquered Scotland & Ireland… BRUTAL TACTICS used

† Disbanded Parliament 1653

Page 16: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

Oliver Cromwell [1599-1658]The “Interregnum” Period [1649-

1660]• The Protectorate (1654-60) = dictatorship

• Cromwell is Lord Protector

• Strict Puritan rule• Prohibited theatre, dance,

alcohol, etc.• Limited rights• Religious conformity• Ended 1658 @ Cromwell’s

death

Page 17: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

New Model Army Soldier’s Catechism

• Puritan Rule or else

• Atrocities vs. Irish Catholics

• Military rule = martial law– Limited Freedoms

Page 18: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

The Public Beheading of Charles I

Why is this execution so significant?

Page 19: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

King Charles II [r. 1660-1685] The Restoration Perioda Had charm, poise, &

political skills.

a Restored the theaters, reopened the pubs and brothels closed during the Cromwell’s Protectorate Era

a Favored religious toleration.

a Secret Catholic sympathies.

a Avoided father’s mistakes

Page 20: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

King Charles II [r. 1660-1685]a 1661 “Cavalier” Parliament [Royalists]

Disbanded the Puritan army.

Pardoned most Puritan rebels.

Restored the authority of the Church of England.

a 1662 Clarendon Code [Act of Uniformity]

Anglican religious conformity = All had to use the Anglican Book of Common Prayer.

Forbade “non-conformists” to worship publicly, teach their faith, or attend English universities… Catholics, Presbyterians, Jews

Page 21: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

King Charles II [r. 1660-1685]

a American “Restoration Colonies”= “Carolinas”

a 1673 Test Act

Parliament excluded all but Anglicans from civilian and military positions…“Puritan Radicals” / “Catholic Traitors”

1679 Habeas Corpus Act

Any unjustly imprisoned persons could obtain a writ of habeas corpus = govt. must explain why imprisoned.

Page 22: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

Charles II’s Foreign Policy1665 – 1667: Second Anglo-Dutch

Wara Uses Louis XIV as

ideal ally against the Dutch… Catholic sympathies, $$ to be made!

a 1670 Treaty of Dover = E + F vs. Dutch

a Declaration of Indulgence rescinds Clarendon Code

Page 23: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

“The Popish Plot 1678”• Titus Oates swore

Catholics were plotting to assassinate King Charles II

• Parliament believed…Hysteria… innocent RCs died… plot proved to be a lie

• Oates condemned & humiliated

Page 24: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

King James II [r. 1685-1688]a Bigoted convert to

Catholicism

a Lacked shrewdness or ability to compromise

a Alienated even the Tories.

a Provoked revolution by his attitude

Page 25: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

King James II [r. 1685-1688]a Put Catholics into the

High Command of both thearmy and navy.

a Stationed “standing army” outside of London.

a Surrounded himself with Catholic advisors & attackedAnglican control of theuniversities.

a Claimed the power to suspend or dispense with Acts of Parliament.

a 1687 Declaration of Liberty of Conscience

He extended religious toleration to RC’s without Parliament’s approval or support.

Page 26: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

The “Glorious” Revolution: 1688a Whig & Tory leaders offer the throne

jointly to James II’s daughter Mary [raised a Protestant] & her husband, William of Orange.

He was a vigorous enemy of Louis XIV.

He was seen as a champion of the Protestant cause.

Page 27: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

English Bill of Rights [1689]a Constitutional

Monarchy

a Settled all major issues between King & Parliament.

a Served as a model for the U.S. Bill of Rights.

a Basis for the steady expansion of civil liberties of 18c and early 19c England.

Page 28: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

English Bill of Rights [1689]a Main provisions:

1. The King could not suspend laws.

2. The King could not interfere with course of justice.

3. No taxes levied or standard army maintained in peacetime without Parliament’s consent.

4. Freedom of speech in Parliament.

5. Sessions of Parliament would be held frequently.

6. Subjects had the right of bail, petition, and freedom from excessive fines and cruel and unusual punishment.

7. The monarch must be a Protestant.

8. Freedom from arbitrary arrest.

9. Censorship of the press was dropped.

10.Religious toleration.

Page 29: By: Ms. Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley H. S. Chappaqua, NY Adapted by: Mr. Reiner Kolodinski English Constitutional Monarchy

Age of Walpole• “House of Hanover” (German)

begins to rule England– Act of Settlement 1701 orderly shift

in power if K/Q are childless– King George I becomes king 1714

• Robert Walpole becomes PM– England flourished under his

leadership in the 1700s• Maintained peace, increased trade