business process optimization - jan 2010
DESCRIPTION
Think about your recent experiences in the airport screening line, the hospital ER, the “fast food” drive through or your neighboring department. Are they always pleasant? Sadly, not all processes function smoothly – often to your customers’ dismay. Through business process optimization, your organization can strive for effectiveness and efficiency through innovation and flexibility. It doesn’t have to be a complicated endeavor – learn how! Presented to Rochester NY IIBA on 28 Jan 2010 by Laura Ribas of The Hartman GroupTRANSCRIPT
IIBA Rochester 1 January 28, 2010
January 28, 2010January 28, 2010January 28, 2010January 28, 2010
Upcoming Events
Date Description Food!
11 March 2010
"Requirements Management Center of Excellence" (CoE) -- Joel Karczewski, Assistant Vice President –Development from Paychex
Dinner event 5:30-7pm - Sanibel Cottage
8 April 2010"Networking: The Whys and Hows" --Sue Schnorr and Emily Carpenter
Dinner event 5:30-7pm - Sanibel Cottage
"Defining and Managing requirements
IIBA Rochester 2 January 28, 2010
13 May 2010"Defining and Managing requirements for the web" -- Mike Johnson, Pixelpunk Creative
Dinner event 5:30-7pm - Sanibel Cottage
17 June 2010
"Unify IT and Business Needs" -- John Magill from Consulting Portal (http://consulting-portal.com/)
Dinner event 5:30-7pm - Sanibel Cottage
Why Are We Here?
Think about your recent experiences in the airport screening line, the hospital
ER, the “fast food” drive through or your neighboring department. Are they
always pleasant?
Sadly, not all processes function smoothly - often to your customers’ dismay.
IIBA Rochester 3 January 28, 2010
Through business process optimization, your organization can strive for
effectiveness and efficiency through innovation and flexibility. It doesn't have to
be a complicated endeavor - learn how!
Who Should be Interested? Everyone!
A short list of sample engagements
� Nursing home/assisted living facility
⇒ Admissions process
� Financial services
⇒ Capacity planning
⇒ Business development
⇒ Client communications/ relationships
� Aerospace
⇒ Systems test environments
⇒ Database maintenance
⇒ Error resolution
� Records management
⇒ Project management
IIBA Rochester 4 January 28, 2010
relationships
⇒ Quality assurance
� Telecom provider
⇒ Financial reporting
⇒ Contract renewal
⇒ Customer transition
� Retail apparel
⇒ Inventory management
� Imaging systems
⇒ Capacity planning
� Component manufacturer
⇒ Procurement
⇒ Production
⇒ Product quality assurance
Business Process Development 101
IIBA Rochester 5 January 28, 2010
� process, n: a series of actions or operations directed toward a particular result
� business, adj: associated with a commercial or industrial enterprise
� integrated, adj: to end the segregation of and bring into common and equal membership in an organization; to unite
� integrated business process development: to bring about a cross-functional, organization-wide, consistent way of doing work
Integrated Business Process Development: Definitions
IIBA Rochester 6 January 28, 2010
“Rising Demand for Larger Screen E-book Readers May Cause Shortage in 2010”
In 2010, demand for larger screen e-book readers measuring 9.7 inches is expected to soar up to 320% year-on-year, says Digitimes Research.
Integrated Business Process Development: Illustration #1
Marketing
IIBA Rochester 7 January 28, 2010
Marketing
Production
Inventory Management
Logistics
SalesCustomer Service
Mind the Gap
of leaders cite boundary spanning as an important capability at the senior executive level (vs. 91% at the mid-management level and 43% at entry level)
of senior executives agree that their peers are effective in working across boundaries (vs. 19% for middle managers and 8% at entry level)
horizontal boundaries pose the greatest
IIBA Rochester 8 January 28, 2010
horizontal boundaries pose the greatest challenge (i.e., function and expertise) followed by geographic, demographic, stakeholder and vertical
Source: “Boundary Spanning Leadership,” Jeffrey Yip, Chris Ernst and Michael Campbell, Center for Creative Leadership
Mind the Gap (cont.)
� Who are you? And how do you see yourself?
Individual Identity
Spouse, parent, friend, sibling, manager, mentor,
leader, American, conservative/liberal, etc.
IIBA Rochester 9 January 28, 2010
Relational Identity
What is your relationship with others on your team? In your functional area? Across your company?
Collective Identity
Who are you as a team and, together, what are you attempting to accomplish?
Source: “The Future of Leadership Development,” David V. Daya, Michelle M. Harrison, Lee Kong. Human Resource
management Review, Volume 17, Issue 4, December 2007
Integrated Business Process Development: Why?
� Develop organizational capability and alignment
� Improve overall organizational efficiency and effectiveness
� Ensure high quality products and services
� Drive consistency, continuity and predictability of performance and results
� Increase agility and flexibility
� Emphasize process-dependency vs. people-dependency
� Reduce confusion and the level of frustration
IIBA Rochester 10 January 28, 2010
� Reduce confusion and the level of frustration
� Maximize the ability to scale and grow
Increase customer satisfaction
Music Parts Plus, Founder and CEO Dominick Moreo
“We reached $1.2 million in sales our first year, shipping about 200 packages a day,” says founder and CEO Dominick Moreo. “But we had an order error rate of close to 10%. That led to a reduction in repeat orders, unhappy customers and our overall expenses going sky high.”
Integrated Business Process Development: Illustration #2
IIBA Rochester 11 January 28, 2010
(Source: “Picking to Win,” Bruce Welty, Material Handling Management, November 2009
What Really Motivates Workers? Results!
“Having just completed a multiyear study tracking the day-to-day activities, emotions, and motivation levels of hundreds of knowledge workers in a wide variety of settings, we now know what the top motivator of performance is . . .
On days when workers have the sense they’re making headway
Integrated Business Process Development: Illustration #3
IIBA Rochester 12 January 28, 2010
On days when workers have the sense they’re making headway in their jobs, or when they receive support that helps them overcome obstacles, their emotions are most positive and their rive to succeed is at its peak.
On days when they feel they are spinning their wheels or encountering roadblocks to meaningful accomplishment, their moods and motivation are lowest.”
(Source: “What Really Motivates Workers,” Teresa M. Amabile and Steven J. Kramer, HBR. January-February 2010)
Integrated Business Process Development: Illustration #3 (cont.)
IIBA Rochester 13 January 28, 2010
Integrated Business Process Development: When?
� Reactive
⇒ Fix major problems or disconnects
⇒ React to internal and/or external changes
⇒ Increase client/customer/partner/satisfaction
⇒ Come into compliance with regulatory requirements
President Obama said that all the required intelligence arrangements were in place on Christmas Day (re: the
Christmas bomber); the only problem was a “failure to
connect the dots.”
IIBA Rochester 14 January 28, 2010
problem was a “failure to connect the dots.”
Integrated Business Process Development: When?
� Proactive
⇒ Prepare for organizational development and growth
⇒ Proactively anticipate organizational and/or operational change requirements
⇒ Anticipate new regulatory requirements and/or mandates
IIBA Rochester 15 January 28, 2010
Our vision is to be the world’s biggest and best confectionery business.Our vision is to be the world’s biggest and best confectionery business.Our vision is to be the world’s biggest and best confectionery business.Our vision is to be the world’s biggest and best confectionery business.Our priorities are focused on four key areas –
growth, efficiency, capabilities and sustainability.“A major group-wide cost and efficiency program across all aspects of our business - in sales and administration, in the supply chain, in the regions and at the group centre. We are aiming to reduce the complexity in our business and minimize duplicated activities”
Process Improvement: From the Customer’s Viewpoint
“Before working at Microsoft, I created a lot of presentations — and like everyone else at the time, I hand-cut graphs and glued them onto paper, sent the text to the typing pool and made glass slides to project on the wall. At the same time, I experimented with the latest computer technologies, figuring out how I could use them to analyze and present data.
Trish May, Founder and CEO,
IIBA Rochester 16 January 28, 2010
At Microsoft, I started thinking about the painstaking processes I had used for those presentations. I wrote and presented a proposal to Bill Gates for a new piece of software for the personal computer, specifically to help people create presentations without all the scissors and paper.”
Source: “The Road to the Cure,” New York Times, Sunday, January 17, 2010.
Trish May, Founder and CEO, Athena Partners
Customer/ Assess
Plan
Do
Business Process Development: Assess (Current State)
IIBA Rochester 17 January 28, 2010
Customer/ Clients
Assess Do
Verify
• Ad hoc
• Minimal process• Not repeatable or predictable• Chaotic
Accidental
• Process in place and enabled• Focus on execution• Rigor and discipline• Performance measures utilized
Awareness
• Guidelines broadened• Repeatable
Predictable
Stage 0
Stage 1
Process Capability Maturity Model Humphrey, Watts (1989). Managing the Software Process. Addison Wesley.
IIBA Rochester 18 January 28, 2010
• Repeatable• Leadership being developed• External benchmarking
• Alignment of goals• Informed decision-making• Cross-departmental leaders• Accountability
Managed
• Business process as a core competency
• Change proficiency• Integrated planning processes• Principles guide action
Mastered
Stage 2
Stage 3
Stage 4
• Ad hoc
• Minimal process• Not repeatable or predictable• Chaotic
Accidental
• Process in place and enabled• Focus on execution• Rigor and discipline• Performance measures utilized
Awareness
• Guidelines broadened• Repeatable
Predictable
Stage 0
Stage 1
Process Capability Maturity Model Humphrey, Watts (1989). Managing the Software Process. Addison Wesley.
IIBA Rochester 19 January 28, 2010
• Repeatable• Leadership being developed• External benchmarking
• Alignment of goals• Informed decision-making• Cross-departmental leaders• Accountability
Managed
• Business process as a core competency
• Change proficiency• Integrated planning processes• Principles guide action
Mastered
Stage 2
Stage 3
Stage 4
Internet start-up – jump in wherever needed and make it work.
• Ad hoc
• Minimal process• Not repeatable or predictable• Chaotic
Accidental
• Process in place and enabled• Focus on execution• Rigor and discipline• Performance measures utilized
Awareness
• Guidelines broadened• Repeatable
Predictable
Stage 0
Stage 1
Process Capability Maturity Model Humphrey, Watts (1989). Managing the Software Process. Addison Wesley.
IIBA Rochester 20 January 28, 2010
• Repeatable• Leadership being developed• External benchmarking
• Alignment of goals• Informed decision-making• Cross-departmental leaders• Accountability
Managed
• Business process as a core competency
• Change proficiency• Integrated planning processes• Principles guide action
Mastered
Stage 2
Stage 3
Stage 4
“We have too many competing IT requests. Which is top priority? We need everyone to follow a detailed submission and approval process.”
• Ad hoc
• Minimal process• Not repeatable or predictable• Chaotic
Accidental
• Process in place and enabled• Focus on execution• Rigor and discipline• Performance measures utilized
Awareness
• Guidelines broadened• Repeatable
Predictable
Stage 0
Stage 1
Process Capability Maturity Model Humphrey, Watts (1989). Managing the Software Process. Addison Wesley.
IIBA Rochester 21 January 28, 2010
• Repeatable• Leadership being developed• External benchmarking
• Alignment of goals• Informed decision-making• Cross-departmental leaders• Accountability
Managed
• Business process as a core competency
• Change proficiency• Integrated planning processes• Principles guide action
Mastered
Stage 2
Stage 3
Stage 4
“Based on historical data and your documented assumptions, we can deliver a finished product in four days for a total cost of $10,000.”
• Ad hoc
• Minimal process• Not repeatable or predictable• Chaotic
Accidental
• Process in place and enabled• Focus on execution• Rigor and discipline• Performance measures utilized
Awareness
• Guidelines broadened• Repeatable
Predictable
Stage 0
Stage 1
Process Capability Maturity Model Humphrey, Watts (1989). Managing the Software Process. Addison Wesley.
IIBA Rochester 22 January 28, 2010
• Repeatable• Leadership being developed• External benchmarking
• Alignment of goals• Informed decision-making• Cross-departmental leaders• Accountability
Managed
• Business process as a core competency
• Change proficiency• Integrated planning processes• Principles guide action
Mastered
Stage 2
Stage 3
Stage 4
“I signed the mission-critical contract in your absence. It met all of our business objectives and allows us to opt-out based on mutual performance metrics that I defined.”
• Ad hoc
• Minimal process• Not repeatable or predictable• Chaotic
Accidental
• Process in place and enabled• Focus on execution• Rigor and discipline• Performance measures utilized
Awareness
• Guidelines broadened• Repeatable
Predictable
Stage 0
Stage 1
Process Capability Maturity Model Humphrey, Watts (1989). Managing the Software Process. Addison Wesley.
IIBA Rochester 23 January 28, 2010
• Repeatable• Leadership being developed• External benchmarking
• Alignment of goals• Informed decision-making• Cross-departmental leaders• Accountability
Managed
• Business process as a core competency
• Change proficiency• Integrated planning processes• Principles guide action
Mastered
Stage 2
Stage 3
Stage 4
“I instated an emergency closure and rerouted all activity to runway 7L/25R. This will cause all aircraft to approach and take off from the east . . .”
Principles-Based
Alignmentwith
Goals
GuidelinesBroadened
Rules-basedAd Hoc
“AnythingGoes”
Process Capability Maturity Model (cont.)
IIBA Rochester 24 January 28, 2010
Stage 0Accidental
Stage 1Awareness
Stage 2Predictable
Stage 3Managed
Stage 4Mastered
Business Process Capability
Assessing the Current State
Define the Process Map the Process�
� Objectives
� Scope
� Expectations
IIBA Rochester 25 January 28, 2010
� Expectations
� Deliverables
� Measures
� Roles and Responsibilities
Define the Process: Definitions
� Objectives
⇒ What are the objectives of optimizing this process?
� Scope
⇒ What does this process include? Not include?
⇒ The process begins…
⇒ The process ends…
� Deliverables
⇒ What are the process deliverables?
� Measures
IIBA Rochester 26 January 28, 2010
� Measures
⇒ What metrics will be utilized to measure/monitor improvements to this process?
� Roles and responsibilities
⇒ Process owner
⇒ Sponsors
Define the Process: Example
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Weather Service (NWS)
are considering plans to consolidate weather service offices
� Objective: The FAA seeks to improve aviation weather services provided at en route centers
� Scope:
⇒ All locations (including remote services):
• 21 regional FAA, en route centers that control planes over the U.S.
• The NWS Aviation Weather Center (Kansas City, MO)
• 122 NWS weather forecast offices nationwide
IIBA Rochester 27 January 28, 2010
• 122 NWS weather forecast offices nationwide
• 21 NWS central weather service units (at FAA en route centers providing 16 hours of services/7 days per week)
⇒ All technologies (e.g., weather/radar processors, terminals, displays)
⇒ All products and services (e.g., forecasts, advisories, briefings)
� Expectations: Fewer sites, reduced personnel costs and increased services (i.e., 24/7 provision)
Source: “GAO-09-887T,” U.S. Government Accountability Office, July 16, 2009
Define the Process: Example (cont.)
� Deliverables
⇒ Defining a common outcome
⇒ Establishing joint strategies to achieve the outcome
⇒ Agreeing upon agency roles and responsibilities
⇒ Establishing compatible policies and procedures to operate across agency boundaries
⇒ Developing mechanisms to monitor, evaluate, and report the results of collaborative efforts
� Sample Measures
IIBA Rochester 28 January 28, 2010
� Sample Measures
⇒ Service provision (hours/days in operation)
⇒ Forecast accuracy (for traffic management decisions)
⇒ Customer satisfaction (timeliness of data, number of complaints)
� Sample Roles and Responsibilities
⇒ The Joint Planning and Development Office is responsible for planning and coordinating with Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) to reduce duplication of efforts and ensure integration
• Restructuring facilities
• Transitioning technologies
Assessing the Current State
Define the Process Map the Process�
IIBA Rochester 29 January 28, 2010
Map the Current State Process
� Document the current state process, not the desired future state (i.e., “what is” vs. “what you’d like it to be”).
� Involve a broad, cross-functional team.
� Use flowcharts, diagrams and/or graphics. Make it as visual as possible.
⇒ Include an appropriate level of specificity and detail.
⇒ Document roles/responsibilities and measures associated with key process steps.
⇒ Document key assumptions.
IIBA Rochester 30 January 28, 2010
� Verify the process map with knowledge experts/key stakeholders.
“Sometimes I find a document on my desk that could have been there for weeks.”
“I receive the information by fax and key it into Excel.” “There are so many
versions out there, I never know what the customer actually agreed to.”
Map the Current State Process
� Document the current state process, not the desired future state (i.e., “what is” vs. “what you’d like it to be”).
� Involve a broad, cross-functional team.
� Use flowcharts, diagrams and/or graphics. Make it as visual as possible.
⇒ Include an appropriate level of specificity and detail.
⇒ Document roles/responsibilities and measures associated with key process steps.
⇒ Document key assumptions.
IIBA Rochester 31 January 28, 2010
� Verify the process map with knowledge experts/key stakeholders.
“Culture eats process
for lunch”
SourceSourceSourceSource: “Culture eats process for lunch.” Barbara J. Hoehn, Journal of Healthcare Information Management . Fall 2009.
Business Process Optimization Sub-teams
� Business process optimization sub-team(s)
⇒ Must have a clear charter, responsibility and accountability
⇒ Cross-functional/cross-departmental participation
⇒ Finite duration (i.e., development/transition of improved processes)
⇒ Enable the organization; not an alternative structure
� Roles and Responsibilities
⇒ Team Sponsor: Senior Leadership Team; provides resources and continuing support, removes barriers.
IIBA Rochester 32 January 28, 2010
continuing support, removes barriers.
⇒ Team Leader: Coordinator, facilitator, provides focus and direction for team, ensures alignment with management objectives.
⇒ Team Members: Cross-organizational, may include partner/client representation, should include content expertise.
⇒ Subject Matter Experts: Invited on an as-needed basis.
Map the Current State Process
� Document the current state process, not the desired future state (i.e., “what is” vs. “what you’d like it to be”).
� Involve a broad, cross-functional team.
� Use flowcharts, diagrams and/or graphics. Make it as visual as possible.
⇒ Include an appropriate level of specificity and detail.
⇒ Document roles/responsibilities and measures associated with key process steps.
⇒ Document key assumptions.
IIBA Rochester 33 January 28, 2010
� Verify the process map with knowledge experts/key stakeholders.
Sample Flowchart: Making Coffee
Take out coffee beans, grinder and
filter
Pot clean?
Measure/scoop beans into grinder
Grind beans
Wash and dry pot
Place pot on coffee
No
Yes
Value Map Key
� VCR—Value creating
� VCO—Value consuming
� NV—Non-value adding
NV: 45 sec.
VCO: 60 sec.VCO: 120 sec.
IIBA Rochester 34 January 28, 2010
Grind beans
Pour ground beans into filter
Place filter in coffee machine
Fill coffee maker with water
Press “on” switch. Brew coffee
Place pot on coffee maker
VCR: 10 sec.
VCO: 20 sec.
VCR: 5 sec.VCR: 120 sec.
VCR: 20 sec.
NV: 10 sec.
Analyze the Current State Process
� Is the process clearly understood?
� Have clear roles and responsibilities, related to the process, been established?
� Is the process consistently executed?
� Are metrics in place to measure/monitor organizational performance related to the process?
� Does the process deliver the expected results predictably and consistently?
IIBA Rochester 35 January 28, 2010
� What part(s) of the process is working well? Not so well (i.e., gaps, disconnects, redundancies)?
� What is the level of satisfaction of all key stakeholders with the current state process?
� What is today’s level of process capability maturity?
� How important is the process to overall organizational performance?
Customer/ Assess
Plan
Do
Business Process Development: Plan (Future State)
IIBA Rochester 36 January 28, 2010
Customer/ Clients
Assess Do
Verify
Develop an Improved Process
� Involve a broad, cross-functional team
� Review the analysis of the current state process (i.e., What’s working? What’s not working?)
� Brainstorm ideas for improvement
⇒ Stretch/challenge the team
⇒ How can you accomplish the same end result cheaper, faster, smarter?
⇒ Eliminate disconnects, hand-offs, redundancies
⇒ Simplify! Simplify! Simplify!
IIBA Rochester 37 January 28, 2010
⇒ Simplify! Simplify! Simplify!
� Collect/review best practices (i.e., benchmarks)
� Generate/prioritize improvement recommendations
⇒ Augment with benchmarks and best practices
⇒ Ask customers, co-workers, partners for input
⇒ Consolidate list, assess impact, prioritize
� Map an improved process (i.e., desired future state)
� Verify with key stakeholders
Dig Deep: The “5 Whys”
“The fries we’re serving are cold (and not meeting corporate standards)”
� 1st Why: Because the heat lamps are not on.
� 2nd Why: Because when the heat lamp switch is turned on it trips the circuit breaker.
� 3rd Why: Because the power circuit has too many appliances on it (4 existing and 1 new), overloading it.
� 4th Why: Because the electrician did not design the circuit to carry 5 appliances.
IIBA Rochester 38 January 28, 2010
appliances.
� 5th Why: Because we didn’t undertake any planning upfront – including an environmental stress test.
Sample Flowchart: Making Coffee Take 2
Take out filter containing pre-measured, pre-ground beans
Place filter in coffee machine with clean
pot
VCO: 20 sec.
We eliminated steps(e.g., measuring, grinding, placing beans in filter, filling pot with water)
We employed new technology (i.e., a self-filling coffee machine)
We added back-up (i.e., more
IIBA Rochester 39 January 28, 2010
pot
Push “on” button to automatically fill maker with water
VCO: 20 sec.
VCR: 20 sec.
We added back-up (i.e., more than one coffee pot to ensure clean pot always available)
We saved 5 minutes :50 seconds off what was originally a 6 minute :50 second process!
Customer/ Clients
Assess
Plan
Do
Business Process Development: Do (Future State)
IIBA Rochester 40 January 28, 2010
ClientsAssess Do
Verify
� Identify a process and/or a departmental champion
� Implement the revised process in a subset of the organization, if possible
⇒ ß-test (if appropriate)
⇒ Test/modify/test/modify
⇒ Document any/all changes
� Implement the improved process organization-wide
⇒ Ensure all stakeholders are involved and have bought in
⇒ Distribute process flowcharts, procedures, etc.
Implement the Improved Process
IIBA Rochester 41 January 28, 2010
⇒ Distribute process flowcharts, procedures, etc.
⇒ Train employees, if required
⇒ Document observations, comments, etc.
Customer/
Plan
Business Process Development: Verify (Future State)
IIBA Rochester 42 January 28, 2010
Customer/ Clients
Assess Do
Verify
Verify Results
� Stabilize the process
� Solicit input from all stakeholders
� Measure results vs. the baseline
⇒ Monitor routinely
⇒ Communicate/celebrate progress
� Continuously improve, as appropriate
⇒ Always look for a better way
⇒
IIBA Rochester 43 January 28, 2010
⇒ Utilize a formal change process across departments
⇒ Keep all documentation current
� Communicate! Communicate! Communicate!
Any Questions?
IIBA Rochester 44 January 28, 2010
In Conclusion
“Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country.”
—John F. Kennedy
“Ask not what your company can do for you but what you can do for your company (and, in return, yourselves).”
X
IIBA Rochester 45 January 28, 2010
—Jennifer Balonek, IIBA Member
Thank you for inviting The Hartman Group to speak
at your January IIBA event!