building and applying a modeling tool to develop and ...€¢gui/mapping provided by dotspatial...
TRANSCRIPT
Building and Applying a Modeling Tool to Develop and Inform the District of Columbia’s Consolidated MS4
TMDL Implementation Plan
Benjamin Crary
LimnoTech
04/08/2016
Overview
1. The District’s stormwater permit requirements
2. Modeling of stormwater runoff and pollutant reductions
3. Implementation Plan Modeling Tool built for the
Department of Environment and Energy (DOEE)
4. Overall Implementation Plan actions
The District’s Stormwater Landscape
Three stormwater conveyance systems in the District:
*Runoff entering the Combined Sewer System is treated at the Blue Plains Treatment Plant.
Conveyance Total Area
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) 19,750 acres
Direct Drainage 7,230 acres
Combined Sewer System 12,220 acres
The District’s MS4 permit requirements
• MS4 Permit Requirement Includes: • WLAs that cover daily, seasonal, and annual time scales
• 500+ numeric MS4 WLAs
• 23 waterbodies
• 45 regulated drainage areas (“TMDL Segments”)
• 18 total pollutants
Conventional Metals Organics Other
Total Nitrogen Arsenic Chlordane Bacteria
Total Phosphorus Copper Heptachlor Epoxide BOD
Total Suspended Solids Lead Dieldrin PCBs
Mercury DDD, DDE, DDT Trash
Zinc PAH1, PAH2, PAH3 Oil and Grease
The District’s MS4 permit requirements
**The permit requires a consolidated TMDL Implementation Plan for all MS4 WLAs
The District’s MS4 permit requirements
Create a consolidated TMDL Implementation Plan for all MS4 WLAs
• Schedule for attainment of all 500+ WLAs
• Demonstration through modeling how attainment will be achieved
• Narrative for schedule and controls
Implementation Plan Modeling Approach
• Runoff and pollutant calculations based on Revised Simple Method
• Runoff is a function of precipitation, area, and the runoff coefficient
• Pollutant load is a function of EMC and runoff
• BMP pollutant removal is a function of BMP volume and load efficiency
BMP Module - Overview
• Reductions driven largely by DOEE’s stormwaterregulations for private development
• Most BMPs now designed to regulatory standards
• Steps to quantify BMP load reductions:• 1. Consolidate and curate an inventory of all BMPs in the
MS4• Bioretention, permeable pavement, trees, etc.
• 2. Establish BMP efficiencies for all BMP types • Known Design Specs: used SWMM-based efficiency curves• Unknown Design Specs: used literature based load efficiencies
• 3. Locate each BMP geographically and assign to appropriate TMDL segments
Program Annual Area Projection
Compliance with Stormwater Regulations
187 acres/yr
Direct investment inBMP implementation and programmatic and source control efforts
21 acres/yr
BMP Module – BMP Efficiency Comparison BMP Type Efficiency at 1.2” Design
Enhanced Permeable Pavement
92%
Enhanced Bioretention
90%
EnhancedBioretentionwith Underdrain
83%
Standard Bioretention
58%
Green Roof 50%
Standard Permeable Pavement
0%
SWMM-based BMP Volume Reduction Efficiency Curves (retention-based BMPs)
*1.2” Design Regulation for Major Land Disturbances
Design Specifications Known: Retention Curves
Design Specifications Unknown: Literature-based efficiency matrix
BMP Module - Efficiencies
Green Roof
Rainwater
Harvesting
Impervious
Surface
Disconnect
Permeable
Pavement
Systems Bioretention
Filtering
Systems Infiltration
Open
Channel
Systems Ponds Wetland
Storage
Practices
Proprietary
Practices
Arsenic 17 8 9 38 41 43 52 36 33 33 19 5
BOD 0 0 0 0 0 40 51 30 0 63 27 0
Chlordane 6 3 3 12 13 14 17 12 11 11 6 2
Copper 20 10 10 45 48 51 61 43 38 38 22 6
DDD 20 10 10 46 49 52 62 44 39 39 23 7
DDE 24 12 13 55 59 63 75 53 47 47 28 8
DDT 22 11 12 51 54 58 69 48 43 43 25 7
Dieldrin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fecal Coliform Bacteria 23 11 12 52 56 60 71 50 45 45 26 7
Heptachlor Epoxide 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lead 27 13 14 60 64 68 81 57 51 51 30 9
Mercury 17 8 9 38 41 43 52 36 33 33 19 5
Oil and Grease 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62
PAH1 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 0
PAH2 9 5 5 21 23 24 29 21 18 18 11 3
PAH3 29 14 15 66 71 76 90 63 57 57 33 9
TN 43 40 13 47 58 40 83 42 20 20 13 5
TP 45 40 13 50 68 60 85 43 45 45 15 10
TPCB 18 9 9 40 43 46 54 38 34 34 20 6
TSS 31 15 16 70 75 80 95 67 60 60 35 10
Zinc 23 11 12 52 56 60 71 50 45 45 26 7
*Runoff and load into practice based on drainage area to BMP
BMP Module - Recap
• Assign an efficiency for each BMP based on design specifications
• Credit efficiency towards meeting appropriate WLA based on its geographic location
• Automate process using the database-driven Implementation Plan Modeling Tool
IPMT Framework
• No proprietary software or licensing requirements except for Windows
• Can be installed locally on any computer that has Windows
• Databases are in MS Access
• Calculator is coded using .Net
• GUI/mapping provided by DotSpatial (Open source GIS)
What does the IPMT do?
• Provide a geospatial display of stormwater related inventories
• Query and display specific TMDL information
• Display BMP implementation spatially and through a detailed inventory
• Calculate runoff, pollutant loads, and load reductions
• Track progress towards WLAs (required by permit)
• Generate report and graphics
Presents complex modeling results in an easy-to-use interface
Geospatial display of stormwater related inventories
Query TMDL Inventory
Display BMP implementation
Track progress towards WLAs
Query detailed results:
Overview of all WLAs:
IPMT Summary
• Power is in the integrated databases • (TMDL inventory, BMP inventory, etc.)
• Great automated tracking and reporting tools• Graphics and tables that feed into reports to EPA
• Framework for continually adding more information
Only one component of a larger Implementation Plan
•Meeting WLA attainment schedules•Milestones and benchmarks•Ultimate attainment of WLAs
•Monitoring•Measures WQ improvements• Feedback for model adjustments
•Other programmatic approaches
Other Implementation Plan Components
Ben CraryLimnoTech
(202) [email protected]
Jonathan ChampionDC Department of Energy and
EnvironmentStormwater Management Division
(202) 535 [email protected]
www.dcstormwaterplan.org