building a better perpetual pavementremlinedigital.com/mdqi/images/stories/mdqi_documents/...7...
TRANSCRIPT
BUILDING A BETTER PERPETUAL PAVEMENT
Richard Willis
Maryland Quality Initiative
January 25, 2017
Baltimore, Maryland
OVERVIEW
Introduction
Perpetual Pavements
Perpetual Pavement Design
Examples
Environmental Performance
3
Introduction
• Layers are necessary to provide economy while
protecting ‘weak’ materials
Courtesy of David Timm
HOW A FLEXIBLE
PAVEMENTWORKS
Courtesy of David Timm
Two functions
Provide sufficient total
pavement thickness
above any material to
prevent permanent
deformation
Provide enough surface
thickness to prevent
fatigue cracking
Layered approach to
distribute load over weaker
materials
6
Evolution of Pavement
Design
Courtesy of David Timm
Pre 1950’s
Experience
1960’s
Development of
Empirical Methods
1980’s
Initial
Mechanistic-
Empirical
Methods
http://www.pcgerms.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Evolution-of-technology-e1344530962564.jpg
1990’s
NCRHP 1-37A
M-E Design
2000’s
Implementation
of M-E Methods
7
Perpetual Pavements
“an asphalt pavement designed and built to
last longer than 50 years without requiring
major structural rehabilitation or
reconstruction, and needing only periodic
surface renewal in response to distresses
confined to the top of the pavement”
APA, 2002
8
The Misconception
• More = better
• Just keep adding thickness
• Truth vs. Practicality
• 1993 AASHTO Design Guide
9
Washington Study (Mahoney)
• Long-lasting pavements thinner than many other
pavements built
–Fatigue resistance
–Right materials in the right places
12
Limitation #1
Vertical Compression
• Critical Location: Top of
Subgrade
• Distress: Subgrade or
structural rutting
• Thicker or stiffer
pavements disperse
stress
13
Limitation #2
Horizontal Strain
• Critical Location: Bottom
of Asphalt Pavement
• Distress: Fatigue
Cracking
• Pulling pavement apart
18
Step 1: Rut Resistant Surface
• Designed to protect the
other pavement layers
• Without this, the other
layers can’t do their job
• Design ideas?
19
Options for Surface Mixtures
• Good dense-graded mix
• Stone-matrix asphalt
–RAP and RAS?
• Choose appropriate
binder grade
• Balancing rutting and
cracking
– Too stiff vs. too soft
20
Change Your Mind
• Sometimes called a
“sacrificial layer”
• In 15-20 years, milled
and replaced
• This must be a high
quality mixture
• Performance test based?
–APA, Hamburg, Flow
Number
21
Step #2 – High Modulus Layer
• High modulus = stiff
• The Good
–Reduce overall necessary thickness or
–Reduce tensile strains of equivalent thickness
22
Step #2 – High Modulus Layer
• The Bad:
–Cracking?
–Hamstring pull
–Know where to place
them
–Minimal strains near
center of pavement
structure
24
Step #3 – Get Flexible
• Fatigue resistant base layer to prevent
fatigue cracking
• High strain tolerance
• Need will depend on structure
• Stiffer structure = reduced strain
• If stiff enough or thick enough, FRBL not
necessary
• But we want thinner, so . . .
25
Fatigue Endurance Limits
• “The horizontal
asymptote of the
relationship between
the applied stress or
strain and the
number of load
repetitions, such that
a lower stress or
strain will result in an
infinite number of
load repetitions” (Von
Quintus, 2001)
–60 - 100με
10
100
1000
1 10 100 1000
log cycles
log
mic
rostr
ain
27
Fatigue Life
• Use a softer binder
–Allows mix to stretch without cracking
• Use more binder
–Most common method
–Rich-bottom layer
–Bump AC or design for lower air voids (2-3%)
• Better compaction
• Improves fatigue resistance
• Does not influence rutting
• Reduces moisture susceptibility
28
Fatigue Resistance of Mixtures
• Numerous technologies
can be used for mixtures
• Must appropriately select
materials for structure
• Can use recycled
materials; however, must
understand structure of
pavement
29
Fatigue Endurance Limits
Mixture Description Fatigue Endurance Limit (FEL), microstrainS9-3 Control 92
N10-3 50% RAP - HMA 100N11-3 50% RAP - WMA 134S10-3 WMA – Foam 99S11-3 WMA – Additive 84N5-4 Thiopave 109N7-3 Kraton 241S12-3 TLA 137
30
So What??
• How does this impact
me?
• AASHTOWare Pavement
M-E
• States have own tools
and systems
• PerRoad 4.2
37
Are Perpetual Pavements Real?
• Asphalt Pavement
Alliance Award
–Minimum 35 years of
service life
–No more than 4 inches of
added structure
–Average minimum 13
years between rehabs
38
• Two main 10,000 ft
runways; 7,000 ft runway,
taxiways, and ramps
• Built in 1949
–12 in gravel sub-base
–10 in bank gravel HMA
–1.5 in stone HMA
• Ensured subgrade
compaction during
process
39
• 1964 – 1 in overlay
• 1973 – 4 in overlay
–Heavier plans
• 1987 – 3 in mill and fill
• 2002 – 95% of base
HMA still in service
40
• “The state of Maryland is extremely proud of the
men and women who have built and maintained
Baltimore/Washington International Airport over the
last 52 years. BWI has grown into the busiest airport
in the Washington region and the durability of its
airfield has provided a strong foundation for that
success.”
–Paul J. Wiedefeld, Executive Director of Maryland
Aviation Administration
An EPD Program for
Asphalt Mixtures
•Program created and overseen by industry
•Web tool to aid contractors to receive EPDs• Fast to get EPDs
• Easy to use
• Saves money
•Launches at NAPA Annual Meeting
www.asphaltpavement.org/epdEnvironmental Product
Declarations