budget_analysis_2010

5
8/7/2019 Budget_Analysis_2010 http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/budgetanalysis2010 1/5 Budget Analysis Budget Analysis 2011-12 Highlights  Fiscal deficit pegged at 4.6% of GDP for 2011-12.  Fiscal deficit projected at 4.1% and 3.5% for 2012-13 and 2013-14, respectively.  Revenue deficit for 2011-12 pegged at 3.4%.  Revenue deficit for 2010-11 revised downwards to 3.4% from the budgeted estimate of 4.0%.  Net market borrowings for 2011-12 is budgeted at Rs. 3,430 billion, 2.3% over 2010-11.  Total expenditure for 2011-12 to increase by 3.4% over 2010-11.  1.4% fall in capital expenditure, while 4.1% increase in revenue expenditure over 2010-11.  Personal income tax slabs changed: Income upto Rs.1.8 lakhs nil. Income between Rs. 1.8 lakhs and Rs. 5 lakhs 10%. Income between Rs. 5 lakhs and Rs. 8 lakhs 20%. Income above Rs. 8 lakhs 30%. Incomes of senior citizens between 60 and 80 years of age, to be exempted upto Rs. 2.5 lakhs and for those above 80 years, exemption applicable upto Rs. 5 lakhs.  Standard rate of excise duty on all non-petroleum products to be maintained at 10%.  Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) rate to be increased from 18% to 18.5%.  Rate of service tax retained at 10%, but coverage extended.  Disinvestment receipts for 2011-12 estimated at Rs 40,000 cr.  Government to move towards direct transfer of cash subsidy for kerosene and fertilizers.  Foreign investors who meet Know Your Customers (KYC) norms to be allowed to invest in Indian equity mutual funds.  FII limit for investment in corporate bond with residual maturity of over five years issued by companies in infrastructure sector, is raised by US$ 20 billion to US$ 25 billion  Rs 6,000 cr allotted to public sector banks to maintain a Tier 1 CRAR of 8% during 2011-12  Direct Tax Code to be implemented by April 1, 2012  Allocation to infrastructure at Rs. 2,14,000 cr for 2011-12, 23.2% higher over previous year Overview Overview The three key macroeconomic concerns before the Union Budget 2011-12 were high inflation, high current account deficit (CAD), and fiscal consolidation. Additionally, there was an expectation that the government would restart the reform process. The Budget has made an attempt to address all these issues, albeit through small steps. Despite the strong performance of the economy in 2010-11, the outlook for 2011-12 is clouded by stubborn and persistently high inflation, and rising external risks. While the Budget sets a lower nominal gross domestic product (GDP) growth target of 14%, we believe that the real GDP growth target of 9% factored in the Budget is on the optimistic side. We expect GDP growth to moderate to 8.3% in 2011-12. By lowering the fiscal deficit target to 4.6% in 2011-12 from 5.1% achieved in 2010-11, the Budget reiterates its commitment towards medium-term fiscal consolidation. The absence of rollback of stimulus (excise) was a bit of a disappointment, though, given that economic growth has recovered. As the Budget sets a lower deficit and net borrowing target, it is not expansionary, and does not conflict with the Reserve Bank of India s measures to tame inflation, at least in intent. The issue is how realistic the target is. We believe that the fiscal deficit will settle around 5% of GDP in 2011-12 a slippage of 40 bps as we expect lower growth, lower tax buoyancy, and absence of one-off gains. There are further risks of slippages on subsidy expenditure on oil and fertilisers, the Budget estimates are conservative. Some bold steps towards expenditure reforms were missing, and will have to be initiated through the year to keep a lid on the subsidy bill and maintain the fiscal space for increased spending on physical and social infrastructure. On the infrastructure front, like in the previous Budget, physical infrastructure has been accorded prime importance. An allocation of Rs 2,14,000 cr has been provided for infrastructural development in 2011-12, which is 23.3% higher than in 2010-11 and amounts to 48.5% of the gross budgetary support to Plan expenditure. To remove the funding constraints for the infrastructure sector, the disbursement target of the government-established India Infrastructure Finance Company Limited (IIFCL) will be raised by Rs 5,000 cr to Rs 25,000 cr by March 31, 2012, along with issuance of tax free bonds worth Rs 30,000 cr by various government undertakings. In addition, the FII limit for investment in corporate bonds with residual maturity of over five years issued by infrastructure companies has been raised by an additional US$20 billion, taking the limit to US$25 billion. In order to facilitate the funding of rural

Upload: fareed-virk

Post on 08-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Budget_Analysis_2010

8/7/2019 Budget_Analysis_2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/budgetanalysis2010 1/5

Budget AnalysisBudget Analysis – 2011-12Highlights

• Fiscal deficit pegged at 4.6% of GDP for 2011-12.• Fiscal deficit projected at 4.1% and 3.5% for 2012-13 and 2013-14, respectively.• Revenue deficit for 2011-12 pegged at 3.4%.• Revenue deficit for 2010-11 revised downwards to 3.4% from the budgeted estimate of 4.0%.• Net market borrowings for 2011-12 is budgeted at Rs. 3,430 billion, 2.3% over 2010-11.• Total expenditure for 2011-12 to increase by 3.4% over 2010-11.• 1.4% fall in capital expenditure, while 4.1% increase in revenue expenditure over 2010-11.• Personal income tax slabs changed:

Income upto Rs.1.8 lakhs – nil.Income between Rs. 1.8 lakhs and Rs. 5 lakhs – 10%.Income between Rs. 5 lakhs and Rs. 8 lakhs – 20%.Income above Rs. 8 lakhs – 30%.Incomes of senior citizens between 60 and 80 years of age, to be exempted upto Rs.

2.5 lakhs and for those above 80 years, exemption applicable upto Rs. 5 lakhs.

• Standard rate of excise duty on all non-petroleum products to be maintained at 10%.• Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) rate to be increased from 18% to 18.5%.

• Rate of service tax retained at 10%, but coverage extended.• Disinvestment receipts for 2011-12 estimated at Rs 40,000 cr.• Government to move towards direct transfer of cash subsidy for kerosene and fertilizers.• Foreign investors who meet Know Your Customers (KYC) norms to be allowed to invest inIndian equity mutual funds.• FII limit for investment in corporate bond with residual maturity of over five years issued by companies in infrastructure sector, is raised by US$ 20 billion to US$ 25 billion• Rs 6,000 cr allotted to public sector banks to maintain a Tier 1 CRAR of 8% during 2011-12• Direct Tax Code to be implemented by April 1, 2012• Allocation to infrastructure at Rs. 2,14,000 cr for 2011-12, 23.2% higher over previous year

Overview Overview The three key macroeconomic concerns before the Union Budget 2011-12 were high inflation, highcurrent account deficit (CAD), and fiscal consolidation. Additionally, there was an expectation that thegovernment would restart the reform process. The Budget has made an attempt to address all theseissues, albeit through small steps. Despite the strong performance of the economy in 2010-11, theoutlook for 2011-12 is clouded by stubborn and persistently high inflation, and rising external risks.While the Budget sets a lower nominal gross domestic product (GDP) growth target of 14%, we believethat the real GDP growth target of 9% factored in the Budget is on the optimistic side. We expect GDPgrowth to moderate to 8.3% in 2011-12.By lowering the fiscal deficit target to 4.6% in 2011-12 from 5.1% achieved in 2010-11, the Budgetreiterates its commitment towards medium-term fiscal consolidation. The absence of rollback of stimulus (excise) was a bit of a disappointment, though, given that economic growth has recovered. Asthe Budget sets a lower deficit and net borrowing target, it is not expansionary, and does not conflictwith the Reserve Bank of India‟s measures to tame inflation, at least in intent. The issue is how realistic the target is. We believe that the fiscal deficit will settle around 5% of GDP in 2011-12 – aslippage of 40 bps – as we expect lower growth, lower tax buoyancy, and absence of one-off gains.There are further risks of slippages on subsidy expenditure – on oil and fertilisers, the Budgetestimates are conservative. Some bold steps towards expenditure reforms were missing, and will haveto be initiated through the year to keep a lid on the subsidy bill and maintain the fiscal space forincreased spending on physical and social infrastructure.On the infrastructure front, like in the previous Budget, physical infrastructure has been accordedprime importance. An allocation of Rs 2,14,000 cr has been provided for infrastructural developmentin 2011-12, which is 23.3% higher than in 2010-11 and amounts to 48.5% of the gross budgetary support to Plan expenditure.To remove the funding constraints for the infrastructure sector, the disbursement target of thegovernment-established India Infrastructure Finance Company Limited (IIFCL) will be raised by Rs5,000 cr to Rs 25,000 cr by March 31, 2012, along with issuance of tax free bonds worth Rs 30,000 crby various government undertakings. In addition, the FII limit for investment in corporate bonds withresidual maturity of over five years issued by infrastructure companies has been raised by anadditional US$20 billion, taking the limit to US$25 billion. In order to facilitate the funding of rural

Page 2: Budget_Analysis_2010

8/7/2019 Budget_Analysis_2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/budgetanalysis2010 2/5

infrastructure, the corpus of the Rural Infrastructure Fund (RIDF) was raised by Rs 2,000 cr to Rs18,000 cr for 2011-12.Social sector spending too remains one of the top priorities of the government. However, refrainingfrom announcing new schemes, the Budget has laid stress on providing reasonable allocation to theexisting schemes, in order to curb fiscal deficit and provide room for the committed Right to Food Act.An allocation of Rs 1,91,400 cr has been provided to social services and rural development in Budget2011-12. However, y-o-y growth of total budget support, together with internal and extra budgetary resources (IEBR), stands at 7.8% in 2011-12 as compared to 27.4% in 2010-11.

On the inclusiveness front, the Budget has inflation-indexed its flagship MGNREGA scheme to ensurestability in real wages. Its usefulness could have been multiplied if the scheme had been dovetailedwith activities that create durable infrastructure and raise productivity in agriculture. Moreover,improved monitoring of the scheme to check leakages would have made these programmes morecredible and effective.

Equity MarketEquity MarketAlthough Budget 2011-12 has not rolled back the stimulus for the markets, it is low on significantpolicy actions. Hence, we believe it is essentially neutral for the domestic equity markets. The marketsare expected to cheer the lower-than-expected fiscal deficit target of 4.6% and an effective revenuedeficit of 1.8% for FY12. However, we expect 4.6% to be challenging – based on GDP growth estimateof 8.3% for 2011-12 – which is less than the government‟s target of 8.75-9.25% growth.Increased capital outlay and other policy measures for infrastructure, education and realty sectors areexpected to boost sentiments and support players‟ growth, but the overall impact on profitability may not be significant. The allocation to infrastructure has been raised by 23.3% to Rs 2.14 lakh cr. TheFII limit for investment in corporate bonds (with maturity over five years) issued in the infrastructuresector has been raised by US$20 bn. Further, the additional deduction of Rs 20,000 for investment inlong-term infrastructure bonds would be extended in FY12. While these measures will facilitatefinancing of infrastructure projects, we believe execution delays rather than financing pose a biggerchallenge for infra companies. The budget allocation for education too has been increased by 24%,which includes Rs 21,000 crore under Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan. The liberalisation of interestsubvention of 1% on housing loans and enhancement of housing loan limit to Rs 25 lakh for unitsunder priority sector lending would be positive for players in affordable and low income housing.On the taxation front, increase in exemption limits - resulting in uniform tax relief of Rs 2,000 - wouldbe positive for consumer discretionary items. On the one hand, reduction in surcharge from 7.5% to5% is positive for corporates; on the other, increase in MAT rate from 18% to 18.5% is negative.Further, the Direct Taxes Code (DTC) is expected to be rolled out as scheduled and the Goods andServices Tax (GST) Amendment Bill will be introduced in this parliament session.

Continuing with its divestment agenda, the government has set a target of raising Rs 40,000 crorethrough divestment of its stake in central public sector undertakings. However, volatile marketconditions could put a spoke in the government‟s divestment wheel.We believe that allowing foreign investors to invest in the domestic market through the mutual fundroute is a key positive, and will increase funds flow from foreign investors. It would prove to be a shotin the arm for the domestic mutual fund industry in the long run.We expect FY12 to be a tale of two halves for the Indian market. In the first half, we expect the marketto remain subdued due to concerns over high commodity prices, inflation and earnings downgrade,whereas in the second half we expect a potential absence or a bare minimum impact of most of thesefactors to provide buoyancy to the markets. Expectation of strong GDP growth coupled with attractivevaluation would support the market in the second half. In the light of global concerns and earningsdowngrade, we have tempered our expectations of returns. We expect the Nifty to trade at 6200-6400(Sensex 20700-21200) by the year-end (December 31). We expect banking, IT and pharmaceuticals todeliver strong returns but we remain neutral on telecom and infrastructure, and negative on realestate.

Sector AnalysisSector AnalysisAuto components & Tyres - Budget to have neutral impact The Union Budget 2011-12 is not likely to have any significant impact on the Indian auto components andtyres industry. The exemption on customs duty on spare batteries for electric vehicles (cars and twowheelers)and concessional excise duty of 4% on these batteries will reduce the maintenance cost of thesevehicles. However, this is not expected to have any significant impact on demand for auto components,given the low population of electric vehicles in India. Natural rubber (NR) will attract customs duty of 20%or Rs 20 per kg (whichever is lower), with effect from April 2011. This will not have any significant impacton the landed cost of NR at current price levels.

Automobiles - Budget to have no significant impact on automobile industry

Page 3: Budget_Analysis_2010

8/7/2019 Budget_Analysis_2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/budgetanalysis2010 3/5

The Union Budget 2011-12 is not likely to have any significant impact on the Indian automobile industry.The extension and enhancement of interest subvention on crop loans from 2 to 3%, revision of wage ratesunder the NREGA scheme and continued focus on rural development will have a marginally positiveimpact on rural two-wheeler and tractor sales. The extension of tax slabs for individual tax payers from Rs1.6 lakh to Rs 1.8 lakh will aid two-wheeler sales. The overall impact on passenger cars and commercialvehicles segment will be largely neutral. The launch of a „National Mission for Hybrid and ElectricVehicles‟ and various excise and customs duty benefits proposed for hybrid, electric, fuel cell andhydrogen cell technology-based vehicles or their parts is unlikely to have any immediate impact, though it

will aid alternate fuel vehicle sales over the longer term.

Banking and Finance - Rise in priority sector home loan limit to benefit banksAs per the Union Budget 2011-12, housing loan limit under priority sector would be enhanced from Rs 20lakhs to Rs 25 lakhs. Also, the limit for interest rate subvention of 1% on home loans would be increasedfrom Rs 10 lakhs to Rs 15 lakhs, for houses priced below Rs 25 lakhs. These measures are expected toassist banks in accomplishing their priority sector lending targets and lower lending rates for borrowers.The hike in interest rate subvention for agriculture loans from 2 to 3% and increased target for credit flow to farmers would facilitate availability of funds at cheaper rates.Public sector banks will be provided Rs 6,000 cr in 2011-12 (in addition to the Rs 23,200 cr provided inthe last 3 years) to maintain a minimum tier-I capital adequacy ratio of 8%, thus improving their ability topursue loan growth more aggressively.

Cement - Increase in excise duty negativeThe Union Budget 2011-12 has proposed the replacement of existing excise duty rates with a 10% advalorem rate and an additional Rs 160 per tonne of cement. This results in an effective 2-4% increase inthe excise duty for the cement industry. In the current operating environment, cement players will not beable to pass on the increase in duty to customers. Further, the Union Budget has proposed a reduction incustom duties for gypsum and pet coke from 5% to 2.5%. Gypsum accounts for a mere 2-3% of the totalcost of sales for cement players. Moreover, pet coke is used as raw material by a select few companiesonly. Hence, the reduction in custom duties is insignificant for the cement industry.

Construction - FII limit on corporate infrastructure bonds raised; tax-free bonds permitted An increase in the foreign institutional investment (FII) limit by US$20 billion for investment in corporateinfrastructure bonds will help mop up bond issues. Further, select government undertakings like IndianRailway Finance Corporation have been allowed to issue tax-free bonds totalling Rs 300 billion. Also, theallocation for Bharat Nirman has been increased by 20% in 2011-12. IIFCL ‟s loan disbursal target hasbeen set higher as well at Rs 25,000 cr for 2011-12 from an estimated Rs 20,000 cr in 2010-11. Theadditional tax exemption of Rs 20,000, provided in 2010-11, on investment in long-term infrastructurebonds has been extended to 2011-12. These proposals are expected to address the funding needs of theinfrastructure segment, and could lead to a faster take-off of infrastructure projects. However, these may not push up the bottomlines of construction companies. Hence, we believe that the impact of the budgeton the construction sector is neutral.

Housing - Increased focus on affordable housingThe interest rate subvention of 1% has been extended for housing loans up to Rs 15 lakhs (for housescosting less than Rs 25 lakhs) from Rs 10 lakhs earlier (for houses costing less than Rs 20 lakhs).Further, priority sector lending limit for housing loans provided by banks has been enhanced from Rs 20lakhs to Rs 25 lakhs. The rural housing fund has been enhanced to Rs 3,000 cr from Rs 2,000 cr whileHUDCO has been allowed the issue of tax free bonds up to Rs 5,000 cr. These measures will provide aboost to affordable housing. The budget has also proposed investment linked tax deduction for affordablehousing projects. This will lead to higher investments in affordable housing projects.Note: The proposal to levy 18.5% minimum alternate tax (MAT) on developers of special economic zone willhave a negative impact on real estate companies with a SEZ focus. This could negate the positive impactof the residential segment thus, making the impact neutral for the overall real estate segment.

Information Technology - MAT levy on SEZ and non-extension of STPI benefits to impact player 

profitabilityThe proposal to bring SEZ units under the purview of the Minimum Alternative Tax (MAT) and the nonextensionof tax benefits for STPI units is expected to adversely impact the profitability of IT players. Midsizedplayers would be more affected as a larger proportion of their revenues accrue from STPI units vis-àvistier-I players. MAT has been raised from 18% to 18.5%, whereas surcharge has been reduced from7.5% to 5%, keeping the effective MAT rate at the same level.Domestic IT services, which constitute about 20% of the IT services revenues, are expected to get a shot inthe arm from the planned government expenditures aimed at improving IT infrastructure and delivery mechanisms.

Oil and Gas - No major impact on oil & gas sector The Union Budget (2011-12) will have no major impact on the oil & gas sector. However, the governmenthas indicated that it would gradually move towards direct transfer of cash subsidies on LPG and kerosene

Page 4: Budget_Analysis_2010

8/7/2019 Budget_Analysis_2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/budgetanalysis2010 4/5

to people living below the poverty line. This will reduce under-recoveries for oil marketing companies inthe future. The government has provided for Rs 23,700 cr as its share in under-recoveries for 2011-12.This is significantly lower than the revised estimates of Rs 38,600 cr for 2010-11. However, we believe thatif under-recoveries increase significantly, the government will increase its contribution towards the same.

Pharmaceuticals - Neutral impact of the budget on the Pharmaceutical sector The impact of the Union Budget 2011-12 on the Pharmaceuticals industry is neutral. The increase inexcise duty on formulations from 4% to 5% will have negligible impact on the industry.

Telecom - Neutral impact on telecom services sector The government has marginally increased the Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) from 18% to 18.5%. At thesame time, it has reduced the surcharge levied from 7.5% to 5%. The cut in the surcharge rate neutralizesthe impact of the increase in MAT by keeping the effective rate of MAT unchanged. The exemption frombasic, countervailing duty (CVD) and special additional duty (SAD) on components and accessories of mobile handsets has been extended for the next financial year and a few more items have now beenincluded in its ambit. The extension of duty exemptions would help in sustaining the current low prices of mobile handsets.

Textiles - Mandatory excise on branded garments negative for textilesThe impact of the Union Budget 2011-12 is negative for the textiles sector. A mandatory excise duty of 10% is being imposed on branded readymade garments (RMG) and textile made-ups. Since it is underCenvat Credit, yarn and fabric manufacturers may have to pay an increased excise duty at 5% vis-à-vis anoptional and concessional 4% duty paid earlier. This will exert further pressure on the margins of RMGand made-ups manufacturers who are already struggling with an unprecedented rise in input costs.However, the reduction in customs duty on Acrylonitrile and rayon grade wood pulp, from 5% to 2.5%each, will benefit acrylic and viscose fibre manufacturers respectively by reducing their raw material costs.As a result, the cost competitiveness of viscose and acrylic will improve vis-à-vis cotton and polyester.Higher budgetary allocation under Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme (TUFS) to Rs 2,980 cr from Rs2,270 cr is a positive for the sector.

Mutual Fund and Financial AnalysisMutual Funds and Financial MarketBudgetary measures and their impact

1. Foreign individual investors allowed to invest in mutual fundsTo liberalise the portfolio investment route, the government has decided to permit SEBI registered mutualfunds to accept subscriptions from foreign investors who meet the KYC requirements for equity schemes.Currently, only FIIs and sub-accounts registered with the SEBI and NRIs are allowed to invest in mutual

fund schemes.

Impact This will widen the investor base of mutual funds and give non-SEBI registered foreign investors anopportunity to invest in Indian equity markets. The measure would also provide an avenue to boost equitymutual fund AUM. More technology enabled products with enhanced risk management practices areexpected to be launched for the global audience.

2. Increase in Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) for money market and debt fundsDDT increased to 30% from 25% on investments made by firms into money market and debt funds. Forretail investors it stays unchanged at 12%.

Impact This would place corporate plans of debt and money market funds at par with bank fixed deposits and thusmay impact inflows.

3. Increase in FII limit in corporate bondsTo enhance the flow of funds to the infrastructure sector, the FII limit for investment in corporate bonds,with residual maturity of over five years issued by companies in the infrastructure sector, is being raisedby an additional limit of US$20 billion; this takes the limit to US$25 billion. This will raise the total limitavailable to FIIs for investment in corporate bonds to US$40 billion. FIIs would also be permitted to investin unlisted bonds with a minimum lock-in period of 3 years and will be allowed to trade amongstthemselves during the lock-in period.

Impact Although an increase in the FII limit is a positive factor, the corporate bond market is expected to remainrange bound as the appetite for investment in infrastructure bonds by FIIs, which till now was US $5 billion,has not been utilized to its fullest. Moreover, since infrastructure as a segment does not account for a major share of issuances in the corporate bond market in India, the impact of the above measure is not expected to

Page 5: Budget_Analysis_2010

8/7/2019 Budget_Analysis_2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/budgetanalysis2010 5/5

be significant in the movement of corporate bond yields.

4. Increase in allocation towards infrastructure bonds• For 2011-12, an allocation of over Rs.2,14,000 crore is being made for the infrastructure sector – a y-o-y growth of 23.3%.• In order to give a boost to infrastructure development in railways, ports, housing and highwaysdevelopment, the government proposes to allow tax free bonds of Rs.30,000 crore to be issued by various government undertakings in the year 2011-12. This includes Indian Railway Finance

Corporation (Rs 10,000 crore), National Highway Authority of India (Rs 10,000 crore), HUDCO (Rs5,000 crore) and Ports (Rs 5,000 crore).

Impact The continued thrust on infrastructure funding is expected to result in an increasing appetite for infrastructure-oriented mutual funds. The focus on infrastructure projects is likely to result in an increasingnumber of corporate bond and equity issuances for fund raising by infrastructure companies and institutions. This would provide an expanding avenue for mutual funds to invest in. It would also boost theinvestment avenues for major market participants such as insurance companies and PF trusts enablingthem to utilize their investment limit in ‘  additional category’   as defined in their investment guidelines inthese bonds.

5. Set-up of notified infrastructure bondsTo attract foreign funds for infrastructure financing, the government proposes to create Special Vehicles inthe form of notified infrastructure debt funds. The income of these funds would be exempt from tax.

Impact The above measure could lead to fund flow from private equity players and major overseas hedge fund. Theadded tax incentives could lead to an increase in allocation of their investments into the emerging market debt through these funds.

6. Life Insurance Companies come under service tax net Services provided by life insurance companies in the area of investment are proposed to be brought intothe tax net on the same lines as ULIPs.

Impact This may have a negative impact on the bottom line of the insurance companies. The incremental impact canbe more on insurance companies with a larger share of non-ULIP products.

7. Penetration of “ Swavalamban”  The co-contributory pension scheme called “Swavalamban” announced in the previous budget has

received over 4 lakh applications from workers in the unorganised sector. Based on feedback, thegovernment proposes to relax the exit norms whereby a subscriber under Swavalamban will be allowed toexit at the age of 50 years instead of 60 years, or a minimum tenure of 20 years, whichever is later.Further, it is proposed to extend the benefit of government contribution from three to five years for allsubscribers of Swavalamban who enroll during 2010-11 and 2011-12. An estimated 20 lakh beneficiariesare expected to join the scheme by March 2012.

Impact The proposal to prepone the exit age as well as government contribution being extended to five years fromthree years would help increase penetration levels in the PFRDA initiative.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this report has been obtained from sources considered to be authentic and reliable. However, IIPM isnot responsible for any error or inaccuracy or for any losses suffered on account of information contained in this report. IIPM does not solicit any action and is not liable for any investment decisions if made on the basis of this report.

CRISIL Research, a Division of CRISIL Limited has taken due care and caution in preparing this Report. Information has been obtained by CRISIL

from sources which it considers reliable. However, CRISIL does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of any information and isnot responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. CRISIL is not liable for investmentdecisions which may be based on the views expressed in this Report. CRISIL especially states that it has no financial liability whatsoever to thesubscribers/ users/ transmitters/ distributors of this Report. CRISIL Research operates independently of, and does not have access to informationobtained by CRISIL‟s Ratings Division, which may, in its regular operations, obtain information of a confidential nature which is not available toCRISIL Research. No part of this Report may be published / reproduced in any form without CRISIL ‟s prior written approval.