budget committee - wordpress.com...feb 11, 2009  · • b. mccarry reported that the meeting with...

58
Budget Committee AGENDA Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 Time: 10:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Location: University Hall, Room 211 1. Minutes of previous meeting (January 28, 2008) ........................................... For approval 2. Business Arising a) Media Production Services (L Scime) ..................................................... To be received 3. 2008/09 Ancillary Budgets a) 10:50 – School of Graduate Studies (A. Sekuler) ................................... To be received b) 11:10 – Graduate Scholarships (A. Sekuler) .......................................... To be received c) 11:25 – Registrar (R. Levin) .................................................................... To be received d) Museum of Art Submission ..................................................................... To be received e) Centre for Leadership and Learning Submission .................................... To be received f) Tuition and Other Fees Submission ........................................................ To be received 4. Other Business..................................................................................................................... Next Meeting: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 in University Hall, Room 211. Note: Regrets to Jan Nicholson x24696 / [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 22-Jan-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Budget Committee

AGENDA

Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 Time: 10:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Location: University Hall, Room 211 1. Minutes of previous meeting (January 28, 2008) ...........................................For approval 2. Business Arising

a) Media Production Services (L Scime) ..................................................... To be received

3. 2008/09 Ancillary Budgets

a) 10:50 – School of Graduate Studies (A. Sekuler) ................................... To be received b) 11:10 – Graduate Scholarships (A. Sekuler) .......................................... To be received c) 11:25 – Registrar (R. Levin) .................................................................... To be received

d) Museum of Art Submission ..................................................................... To be received

e) Centre for Leadership and Learning Submission .................................... To be received

f) Tuition and Other Fees Submission ........................................................ To be received

4. Other Business..................................................................................................................... Next Meeting: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 in University Hall, Room 211.

Note: Regrets to Jan Nicholson x24696 / [email protected]

Page 2: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

BUDGET COMMITTEE Wednesday, January 28, 2009 University Hall, Room 211

Minutes

Present: B. McCarry (Chair), I. Busch-Vishniac, A. Jacob, A. Payne C. Tellier, D. Welch, J. Nicholson (Recording Secretary) Regrets: J. Asanin Dean, K. Belaire, P. George Consultants: L. Mitton, L. Scime The Chair called the meeting to order at 10:40 a.m. 1. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING IT WAS DULY MOVED AND SECONDED To approve the minutes of the January 14, 2009 and January 21, 2009 Budget

Committee meetings. The motion was carried. 2. BUSINESS ARISING

• L. Mitton reported that the B.Tech. envelope had been set up.

• L. Scime is reviewing a draft of the letter to the VP Research.

• B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated the new information presented by K. Menard and L. Scime at the meeting.

Action Item: L. Mitton to invite K. Menard to explain the calculation of funding allocations prior to the Faculty presentations.

• The presentation of the Graduate Scholarships budget has been rescheduled to February 11.

• It was agreed to hold a special meeting on April 1 to accommodate J. Kelton’s presentation of the Health Sciences’ budget as he cannot make the other scheduled meetings of Budget Committee.

Page 3: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

BUDGET COMMITTEE January 28, 2009 2

Action Item: J. Nicholson to send an email confirming the meeting. L. Mitton to confirm with J. Kelton.

• The President’s Advisory Committee (ICE) convened and held its first meeting yesterday. L. Scime did a marvelous job of bringing the diverse members of the committee to the same page. Twelve issues have been identified for investigation.

3. 2009/10 ANCILLARY BUDGETS

a) Centre for Continuing Education CCE

• Tracey Taylor-O’Reilly and Peter Smith joined the meeting.

• Tracey Taylor-O’Reilly presented the 2009/10 budget for the Centre for Continuing Education. Budget Committee members’ questions were addressed.

• With regard to recent contracts for training with the Government of Alberta, it was mentioned that the province provides grants to cover indirect costs through a management fee as well as the direct costs of the program. These additional funds will be critical if CCE plans to expand this type of business further. Conferences of government managers are one of the areas used for marketing CCE’s programs. Some opportunities have been lost due to insufficient resources to follow up. Currently, CCE is heavily involved in the development and delivery of these programs but knows that it will need to increase its marketing efforts in the future.

• The Federation of Canadian Municipalities was mentioned as an area to explore. CCE has found municipal governments difficult to engage due to tighter budgets and challenging procurement policies. CCE tends to go directly to the front line managers with programs that fall within their budgetary control.

• It was agreed that Tracey has done a remarkable job of turning CCE around. This budget envelope is one that McMaster can be proud of and is well positioned to weather the recession.

• Conversations have begun regarding goals for the next strategic plan. Ideas for future goals include improving the earning capacity of the unit to provide an income stream to the University, expanding programs, or providing the infrastructure to partner with the Faculties in expanding programs and services. It will be important for CCE to be well positioned to take advantage of opportunities emerging from the recession.

• There were three areas of funding from the Federal Budget that will help CCE. There is funding for retraining for industries in difficulty, increased funding for those on EI, and funding for those that don’t qualify for EI.

• CCE is looking at working strategically in a strengthened association with rest of the university regarding Distance Learning. CCE is improving quality and delivery in its current programs. The next program launched will be an on-line certificate program

Page 4: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

BUDGET COMMITTEE January 28, 2009 3

where best practices and standardization can be achieved. A new product line being looked at is graduate certificates and/or professional graduate degrees. These programs would be offered in conjunction with the Faculties.

• The assumption is currently that CCE will continue to be housed in the downtown centre. While approximately $200K of the reserve is earmarked for capital improvements, some of the balance could be used to invest in areas of interest. There is the initial development to consider and then the capacity to absorb the losses that are typical in the first year.

• Tracey Taylor-O’Reilly and Peter Smith left the meeting. IT WAS DULY MOVED AND SECONDED To receive the 2009/10 Centre for Continuing Education Budget. The motion was carried.

• The Chair reminded committee members that budgets are received rather than approved at this stage. The data from individual budget envelopes are combined into a single budget spreadsheet for the university; this spreadsheet is not complete until all budgets have been presented and received. The first version of the university budget will be available in mid to late April at which time it will be discussed; a final version of the university budget will be available for approval about the middle of May. Budget items dealing with tuition rates, fees or some other charges need to be approved.

b) Telecommunications

• Heather Grigg and Natalie Illingworth joined the meeting.

• Heather Grigg presented the 2009/10 budget for Telecommunications. Budget Committee questions were addressed.

• Demand for land lines is likely to diminish over time as new technologies like cell phones take over. Revenues could be expected to fall as well, driving up rates, which in turn reduces use.

• Telecommunications will be looking at whether the current model makes sense in the longer term and at alternative revenue sources. Web conferencing is done centrally using a product called Elluminate; video conferencing is not centralized although Media Services does offer a video conferencing service. Another service to be investigated is an “all-in-one” service for cell, fax, email, voicemail, etc. (i.e., unified communications and messaging).

• The Bell contract is up for negotiation in 2009. The period for contracts for infrastructure (e.g., phone switches) tend to be about 5 years while contracts for service are usually in the range of 3 years.

• N. Illingworth has done an analysis on the impact of the proposed phone rate increase of $1 per year for each of the next three years. This rate increase would generate about $70K per year in total. Telecommunications was asked to consider the impact this increase would have on phone usage across campus and whether

Page 5: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

BUDGET COMMITTEE January 28, 2009 4

the gains in reducing the deficit would be substantial enough to offset the anticipated negative reaction of users. The new CIO starts February 17, 2009. Any rate increase should be announced prior to his arrival so that there is no negative impact on his reputation just as he is starting the new job.

• There appears to be sufficient bandwidth at the moment to tackle new projects. Telecommunications has been able to negotiate contracts with secondary providers to increase bandwidth at no extra cost.

• The switchboard is predominantly run by part-time staff. Adjustments are being made to reduce services and save costs.

• Heather Grigg and Natalie Illingworth left the meeting.

• The Budget Committee is concerned about the potential for a shift in phone usage away from land lines and what form this shift would take. The proposed $1 per year increase in phone rates may not be wise politically given the current economic climate. It was acknowledged that there hasn’t been an increase in phone rates in many years, that the proposed increase is small and that the unit needs to reduce its deficit. It was pointed out that the costs of providing phone services have decreased substantially so profits on providing this service were strong for many years. This envelope used to have a significant budget reserve and financed expensive equipment for the university. The envelope still pays for installations of telecommunications equipment in new buildings. While Telecommunications is part of UTS, it is treated as an ancillary; Telecommunications contributes approximately $250K per year to the operating budget.

• The Budget Committee received the budget with the understanding that the new CIO would pay close attention over the coming year to integrating this group with UTS and repositioning the budget envelope for success.

IT WAS DULY MOVED AND SECONDED

To receive the 2009/10 Telecommunications Budget.

The motion was carried.

c) Parking

• Terry Sullivan, Diana Parker and Natalie Illingworth joined the meeting.

• Terry Sullivan presented the 2009/10 budget for Parking. Budget Committee questions were addressed.

• Fines are still being handed out to people illegally parked in loading zones, etc. but the number of fines issued has decreased with the new automated parking lots. The number of employees is being reduced over time from 8 to 4 as a result of the introduction of the automated gates. The priority of Parking Services is to educate people on the use of the new gate system.

• There is no increase in parking fees this year. The last large increase in parking fees was 5 years ago when fees rose from $39 to $67 to match cost of a bus pass. There was discussion about both raising and lowering parking rates. The

Page 6: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

BUDGET COMMITTEE January 28, 2009 5

underground parking garage is nowhere near capacity in terms of use by permit holders; increasing the number of permit holder will require some marketing. Bike storage lockers are added in response to demand.

• Access to parking on campus has been an issue in the recruitment of new faculty for several years. The current seniority-based system of awarding parking spaces does not allow flexibility to accommodate these types of requests. On the other hand, it is difficult to maintain a balance between the needs of faculty and senior/long-term staff. Many US universities use a lottery system to allocate parking on an annual basis; Parking staff were unaware of this and said that such an option would be worth examining.

• Terry Sullivan, Diana Parker and Natalie Illingworth left the meeting.

IT WAS DULY MOVED AND SECONDED To receive the 2009/10 Parking Budget. The motion was carried.

• A. Jacob left the meeting.

d) Media Services

• Suzanne Moorcroft joined the meeting.

• Suzanne Moorcroft presented the 2009/10 budget for Media Production Services. Budget Committee questions were addressed.

• A Vice-President from a US university is doing assessment reviews on print environments for the Canadian University Print Management Association to provide print strategy tools for universities and colleges. McMaster is being used as a beta site so he will be doing a review of our operations and providing useful feedback regarding services, alliances, forms of communications, etc. This report will assist in determining where copies should be made (at the office printer, office photocopier, print shop or off campus), how to provide the best service economically, and how to encourage people to make the right decisions. This report is expected to be completed in the next couple of months.

• It is difficult to gauge the needs on campus and MPS tends to have a “feast or famine” workload. MPS needs the capacity to manage heavy volumes, particularly in September, and to that end had signed a substantial agreement with Xerox. MPS needs to maintain volume to cover the substantial fixed costs of this Xerox equipment. This situation has been discussed at PVP where it was agreed that work, particularly high volume printing, would be done in-house where possible. Staff in the offset printing area has been reduced over the last 6 or 7 years by approximately 30% so MPS is a leaner department today than in the past.

• It is helpful to link service areas with academic areas. As initiatives such as video conferencing move forward, there may be an opportunity to develop projects jointly. For example, Humanities has communications-specific multi-media equipment and one of the best computer labs on campus. It is worth investigating the possible

Page 7: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

BUDGET COMMITTEE January 28, 2009 6

advantages of working together on issues such as training students, efficiencies in utilization, low-cost student labour, etc.

• The envelope is forecasting a $90K deficit this year and $130K next year at the current levels. Print use as a medium may keep declining. Budget Committee looks for a positive revenue stream from ancillaries. The question was posed as to whether and at what point MPS, at least in terms of print, should be eliminated.

• There are still some areas of growth, and solutions to some of the current fiscal problems may be found. There are some large costs associated with providing course-packs such as the cost of copyright access. Some faculty members are taking the printing of course-packs off campus to print shops that simply ignore the copyright issue. Research has shown that students still want their course materials in print form so that they can make notes. The challenge for MPS is to recapture the printing business that goes off campus.

• The credibility of revenue projections was discussed. It is expected that specific aspects of printing jobs for the hospital sector will return to MPS as budgets ease. Revenues have been consistent over the past few years and it is believed that gains from the right of first refusal and new marketing initiatives will be sufficient to generate about $200K in new revenues. Given that there is a 6-year contract in place with Xerox, there are serious challenges in utilizing this equipment efficiently. Xerox has offered to assist in marketing the IGEN service to other organizations. Colour capability on the new Sharp photocopiers has caused a temporary drop in colour printing business. It is believed that quality issues will lead to a return in print volume to previous levels in the longer term. The partnership collaboration with Mohawk College has been a challenge in the past because decisions by Mohawk management had resulted in substantial decreases in print volume; it is hoped that under the new management at Mohawk there may return of Mohawk print work to MPS.

• MPS reserves are negative and there is a projected deficit for this year and next year. However in the analysis of fixed costs, if MPS can increase production to 18M impressions annually, then it would produce $400K per year. This analysis is not included in the current projections. Success in achieving this goal will be what the Budget Committee will be looking for in the 5-month budget review in the fall of 2009.

• The $130K deficit includes a $100K transfer to reserve which should be removed to reduce their in-year deficit to $30k.

• Suzanne Moorcroft left the meeting.

• At the end of the 6-year contract with Xerox, it will be important to ask whether there should continue to be a print shop on campus.

Action Item: L. Scime to remove the $100k reserve and work toward a balanced MPS budget. This budget will be brought back to be received at a later date.

Page 8: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

BUDGET COMMITTEE January 28, 2009 7 4. OTHER BUSINESS

• There was no other business.

The meeting adjourned at 12:55 p.m. The next meeting of Budget Committee will be held on Wednesday, February 11, 2009.

Page 9: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

McMaster University2009/10 to 2010/11 Budget Template

Budget 9 Month Projection

Year-end Actual FTE Budget FTE Year-end

Projection FTE Budget FTE Plan FTE 2007/08 vs 2008/09

2008/09 vs 2009/10

2009/10 vs 2010/11

RevenueFunding Transfer - videoconference initiative 0 0 (51,320) 0 0 29,758 0McMaster Recoveries 3,006,000 2,723,888 2,618,835 3,850,000 2,727,823 1 2,848,000 2,929,000 28.08% -26.03% 2.84%Mohawk College Recoveries 919,000 978,988 871,626 1,031,000 882,055 966,000 989,750 12.19% -6.30% 2.46%Hamilton Health Sciences Recoveries 303,500 345,282 305,195 232,500 169,266 178,000 185,000 -23.39% -23.44% 3.93%St. Joseph's Healthcare Recoveries 145,000 143,552 143,008 100,000 55,025 60,000 61,000 -31.03% -40.00% 1.67%Total Revenue 4,373,500 4,191,710 3,887,344 5,213,500 3,834,169 4,081,758 4,164,750 19.21% -21.71% 2.03%

ExpensesSalaries, Wages and Benefits

Full-time 1,690,884 1,621,326 1,717,763 32.3 1,595,787 32.3 1,550,695 32.3 1 1,602,293 29.8 1,648,957 29.8 -5.62% 0.41% 2.91%Part-time 40,000 74,081 100,098 115,000 49,158 65,000 65,000 187.50% -43.48% 0.00%External 140,498 157,983 117,532 2.5 146,160 2.5 145,622 2.5 145,498 2.5 149,863 2.5 4.03% -0.45% 3.00%

Benefits 529,909 522,116 569,322 567,652 573,757 1 592,848 610,114 7.12% 4.44% 2.91%Total Salaries, Wages and Benefits 2,401,291 2,375,506 2,504,715 2,424,599 2,319,232 2,405,639 2,473,934 0.97% -0.78% 2.84%Provision for Reserve 65,000 65,000 65,000 100,000 0 0 100,000 53.85% -100.00% n/a* Contribution to Operating Budget 0 0 0 51,310 51,310 39,390 39,390 n/a -23.23% 0.00%Rent and Utilities 110,180 110,180 110,182 110,180 110,180 110,180 110,180 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%Telephone 11,810 11,606 12,226 11,606 12,187 12,909 12,909 0.00% 11.23% 0.00%Equipment & Software 14,000 500 500 9,000 6,297 9,000 9,000 1700.00% 0.00% 0.00%Equipment Leases 680,000 570,472 468,471 1,170,201 531,947 1 594,750 594,750 105.13% -49.18% 0.00%Equipment Repairs & Maintenance 48,500 75,937 137,580 81,000 34,706 36,000 36,000 67.01% -55.56% 0.00%Travel 10,650 11,487 15,791 10,150 5,743 5,000 5,000 -4.69% -50.74% 0.00%Paper Costs 513,750 427,863 422,703 663,000 405,044 1 489,390 507,165 29.05% -26.19% 3.63%Staff Training 5,000 1,609 1,527 5,000 1,000 5,000 5,000 0.00% 0.00%MPDA Allocation 7,000 3,397 7,268 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 0.00% 0.00%Capital/Renovation Expenditure 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 n/a n/aOutsourced Work 135,100 259,014 370,408 175,000 202,118 175,000 150,000 0.00% -14.29%Other Operating Expenditures 347,115 367,953 419,213 380,000 236,717 1 192,500 192,500 -49.34% 0.00%Total Expenses 4,359,396 4,280,524 4,535,584 34.8 5,198,046 34.8 3,923,481 34.8 4,081,758 32.3 4,242,828 32.3 19.24% -21.48% 3.95%

Surplus/(Deficit) 14,104 -88,814 -648,240 15,454 -89,312 0 -78,078 9.57% -100.00% n/a

ReserveBeginning Balance 99,433 (63,493) (63,493) (138,617) (646,733) (736,045) (736,045)Additions during the year 14,104 (88,814) (596,930) 15,454 (89,312) 0 (78,078)Transfer to Reserve 65,000 65,000 65,000 100,000 0 0 100,000Disbursements during the year (58,579) (51,310) (51,310) 2 0 0 0 0Closing Balance 119,958 -138,617 -646,733 -23,163 -736,045 -736,045 -714,123

Indicators

Benefits as a % of Total Salaries & Wages 28.32% 28.17% 29.42% 30.57% 32.87% 32.70% 32.73%Surplus/(Deficit) as a % of Expenses 0.32% -2.07% -14.29% 0.30% -2.28% 0.00% -1.84%% Change in FTE's over Prior Year N/A N/A N/A 0.00% 0.00% -7.18% 0.00%

1

2 During 2007/08, the contribution to operating was to be taken from the reserve. In 2008/09, the contribution to operating was taken directly from the operating budget.

MPS presented a preliminary budget in anticipation of the new Campus Copier Fleet Initiative. The budget is shown within the 2008/09 budget as it was approved, however the budget has been transferred to the Operating Budget under the Vice President - Administration. The copier budget has been included in the Synopsis under the Explanation of variances.

2 Year Planning Window

% Increase in Budget2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11

Agenda Item 2a

Page 10: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

BUDGET SUBMISSION REVIEW CHECKLIST

Budget Envelope: School of Graduate Studies

Envelope Manager: Alison Sekuler

Presentation/Submission Date: February 11, 2009

Due date January 28, 2009 Received date February 2/09 Timeliness

Date issued to Budget Committee: February 5, 2009 Timeliness

Yes Nox Was the correct format used? Completeness - ______________________________________

x Are there any anomalies? Reasonableness _________________________________________

x Do trends make sense? Reasonableness __________________________________________

Is the Budget Envelope balanced?

Surplus/(Deficit)Appropriation/

Reserve Balancex 2008/09 50,206$ 598,535$ x 2009/10 (244,528)$ 354,007$

x Have FTE's been reported on the correct line?

Are the allocations correct?Approved Budgeted/Projected Variance

x 2008/09 Ongoing 999$ 999$ -$ x One-time 130$ 130$ -$ x Total 1,129$ 1,129$ -$

x 2009/10 Ongoing 999$ 999$ -$ x One-time 130$ 130$ -$ x Total 1,129$ 1,129$ -$

x Is follow-up required? If yes what was done?

Submission Highlights (Numerical Data) & Concerns:With the appointment of Allison Sekuler to the new title of Assoc.VP & Dean of the School of Graduate Studies, there is a change in themandate of SGS (details in their submission notes).As a result, the School of Graduate Studies is undergoing a period of transition and re-organization.

Variances

2008/09 Budget 2008/09 Projection 2009/10 Budget2008/09 Projectionvs 2008/09 Budget

2009/10 Budgetvs 2008/09 Projection

RevenueOperating allocation 1,129$ 1,129$ 1,129$ -$ -$ Revenues 115 69 67 (46) (2) Recoveries and transfers 421 687 711 266 24 Total sources of funding 1,665$ 1,885$ 1,907$ 220$ 22$

ExpensesAcademic salaries/benefits 137$ 163$ 160$ (26)$ 3$ Support salaries/benefits 1,051 1,011 1,308 40 (297) TA salaries/benefits - - Hourly wages/benefits - - Total salaries/benefits 1,188$ 1,174$ 1,468$ 14$ (294)$

Q:\Budget\Budget Committee\2005\Submissions\Budget Submission Checklist - School of Graduate Studies 2/5/2009 12:37 PM

Agenda Item 3a

Page 11: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Other supplies/expenses 523 661 684 (138) (23) Utilities - - Library acquisitions - - Equipment/renovations - - Scholarships/bursaries - - Total expenses 1,711$ 1,835$ 2,152$ (124)$ (317)$

Operating surplus/(deficit) (46)$ 50$ (245)$ 96$ (295)$

Ongoing surplus/(deficit) 16$ 127$ 0.5$ 111$ (127)$ One-time surplus/(deficit) (62) (77) (245) (15) (168) Total operating surplus/(deficit) (46)$ 50$ (245)$ 96$ (295)$

Explanations of major variances:

08/09 - Rev/Recov/Trfs - increase-$300k transfer from Provost and decrease of $37.5k originally planned from Registrar did not happen - decrease in revenue - $45k - budget moved to transfers

08/09 - Salary/fb - decrease - vacant position for most of year and increase in academic salaries - 3 to 4 assoc.deans08/09 - Other Suppl & Exp - one-time costs for admissions mgmt software, leftover recruiting obligations and renovations for office space

09/10 - Salary/fb - increase costs - Vacancy now filled, additional position required and reorganization, increase to 6 assoc.deans

Details of transfers and recoveries:

Amount$300,000

Budgeting Services Contact: Chris SylvesterDate Reviewed: 4-Feb-09

To/from envelope Other side budgeted?Sch of GS from Provost

Q:\Budget\Budget Committee\2005\Submissions\Budget Submission Checklist - School of Graduate Studies 2/5/2009 12:37 PM

Agenda Item 3a

Page 12: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Agenda Item 3a

Page 13: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Agenda Item 3a

Page 14: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Agenda Item 3a

Page 15: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Agenda Item 3a

Page 16: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

BUDGET SUBMISSION REVIEW CHECKLIST

Budget Envelope: Graduate Scholarships

Envelope Manager: Alison Sekuler

Presentation/Submission Date: March 11, 2009

Due date February 25, 2009 Received date February 2, 2009 Timeliness

Date issued to Budget Committee: February 5, 2009 Timeliness

Yes Nox Was the correct format used? Completeness - ______________________________________

x Are there any anomalies? Reasonableness _________________________________________

x Do trends make sense? Reasonableness __________________________________________

Is the Budget Envelope balanced?

Surplus/(Deficit)Appropriation/

Reserve Balancex 2008/09 (1,000,000)$ 3,870,996$ x 2009/10 (1,000,000)$ 2,870,996$

Have FTE's been reported on the correct line? n/a

Are the allocations correct?Approved Budgeted/Projected Variance

x 2008/09 Ongoing 10,583$ 10,583$ -$ One-time -$

x Total 10,583$ 10,583$ -$

x 2009/10 Ongoing 10,780$ 10,780$ -$ One-time -$

x Total 10,780$ 10,780$ -$

x Is follow-up required? If yes what was done?

Submission Highlights (Numerical Data) & Concerns:

Over the coming months a new scholarship allocation methodology will be developed (increased efficiency, fairness & transparency).Will continue to reduce large surplus via continued investment in graduate expansion & a healthier student life environment.

Variances

2008/09 Budget 2008/09 Projection 2009/10 Budget2008/09 Projectionvs 2008/09 Budget

2009/10 Budgetvs 2008/09 Projection

RevenueOperating allocation 10,042$ 10,583$ 10,780$ 541$ 197$ Revenues - - Recoveries and transfers (1,565) (1,864) (1,151) (299) 713 Total sources of funding 8,477$ 8,719$ 9,629$ 242$ 910$

ExpensesAcademic salaries/benefits -$ -$ Support salaries/benefits - - TA salaries/benefits - - Hourly wages/benefits - - Total salaries/benefits -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Q:\Budget\Budget Committee\2005\Submissions\Budget Submission Checklist - Graduate Scholarships 2/5/2009 12:25 PM

Agenda Item 3b

Page 17: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Other supplies/expenses 11 - (11) 11 Utilities - - Library acquisitions - - Equipment/renovations - - Scholarships/bursaries 8,477 9,708 10,629 (1,231) (921) Total expenses 8,477$ 9,719$ 10,629$ (1,242)$ (910)$

Operating surplus/(deficit) -$ (1,000)$ (1,000)$ (1,000)$ -$

Ongoing surplus/(deficit) -$ -$ One-time surplus/(deficit) (1,000) (1,000) (1,000) - Total operating surplus/(deficit) -$ (1,000)$ (1,000)$ (1,000)$ -$

Explanations of major variances:

08/09 - Framework allocation increase of $541k09/10 - Framework allocation increase of $197k

08/09 - one-time $1m expenditure planned to support graduate expansion and student life (more details to follow)

09/10 - one-time $1m expenditure planned to support graduate expansion and student life (more details to follow)

Details of transfers and recoveries:

Amount

Budgeting Services Contact: Chris SylvesterDate Reviewed: 4-Feb-09

To/from envelope Other side budgeted?

Q:\Budget\Budget Committee\2005\Submissions\Budget Submission Checklist - Graduate Scholarships 2/5/2009 12:25 PM

Agenda Item 3b

Page 18: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Agenda Item 3b

Page 19: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Agenda Item 3b

Page 20: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Agenda Item 3b

Page 21: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Agenda Item 3c

Page 22: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Agenda Item 3c

Page 23: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Agenda Item 3c

Page 24: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Agenda Item 3c

Page 25: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Agenda Item 3c

Page 26: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Agenda Item 3c

Page 27: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Agenda Item 3c

Page 28: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Agenda Item 3d

Page 29: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Agenda Item 3d

Page 30: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Agenda Item 3d

Page 31: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Agenda Item 3d

Page 32: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Budget ActualFavourable/

(Unfavourable) FTE's BudgetYear-to-date

December 2008 On-going One-timeTotal

ProjectionFavourable/

(Unfavourable) FTE's On-going One-timeTotal

Budget FTE's

Sources of Funding

1. Operating AllocationBase Allocation 270,000 270,000 0 270,000 270,000 270,000 0 270,000 0 270,000 0 270,000Variable 0 0 0 0One-time 0 0 0 0

Total Allocation per Framework 270,000 270,000 0 270,000 270,000 270,000 0 270,000 0 270,000 0 270,000

2. RevenueGrants 10,000 8,000 (2,000) 8,000 8,000 0 8,000 8,000 0 0 10,000 10,000Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other Income 113,300 135,956 22,656 65,000 64,815 43,951 15,000 58,951 (6,049) 40,600 25,000 65,600Donations 17,000 43,735 26,735 10,000 11,370 10,000 0 10,000 0 32,000 0 32,000

Total Revenues 140,300 187,691 47,391 83,000 84,185 53,951 23,000 76,951 (6,049) 72,600 35,000 107,600

3. RecoveriesRecoveries (Internal & External) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Recoveries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4. TransfersFICR and Other Research Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other Transfers 738,681 792,727 54,046 632,320 9,585 632,320 0 632,320 0 600,000 0 600,000

Total Transfers 738,681 792,727 54,046 632,320 9,585 632,320 0 632,320 0 600,000 0 600,000

Total Sources of Funding 1,148,981 1,250,418 101,437 985,320 363,770 956,271 23,000 979,271 (6,049) 942,600 35,000 977,600

Object of Expense

1. Academic SalariesAcademic Salary-Full-time 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00Academic Salary Recoveries 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00Contractually Limited Appointments 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00Permanent Teaching Track 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00CAWAR/Special 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00Academic Release Time 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00Academic Stipends 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00Academic Salaries-Part-time 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00

Total - Academic Salaries 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00

Academic BenefitsAcademic Benefits-Full-time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Academic Benefits Recoveries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Academic Benefits-Part-time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total - Academic Benefits 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total - Academic Salaries & Benefits 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00

2. Support SalariesSupport Salaries-Full-time 509,900 556,041 (46,141) 0.00 409,000 341,844 409,000 0 409,000 0 9.00 492,000 0 492,000 10.00Support Salary Recoveries 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00

Support Salaries-Part-time 124,400 100,003 24,397 0.00 84,000 72,986 84,000 0 84,000 0 0.00 41,000 24,000 65,000 0.00Total - Support Salaries 634,300 656,045 (21,745) 0.00 493,000 414,830 493,000 0 493,000 0 9.00 533,000 24,000 557,000 10.00

Support Benefits

Projection2007/08 2008/09

Budget2009/10

MUSEUM OF ARTBudget Review & SubmissionFor the Fiscal Years 2008/09 and 2009/10964300

C:\Documents and Settings\duartel\My Documents\MyFiles\SAS FM Report Template\SAS FM report template2/6/2009

Agenda Item 3d

Page 33: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Budget ActualFavourable/

(Unfavourable) FTE's BudgetYear-to-date

December 2008 On-going One-timeTotal

ProjectionFavourable/

(Unfavourable) FTE's On-going One-timeTotal

Budget FTE's

Projection2007/08 2008/09

Budget2009/10

MUSEUM OF ARTBudget Review & SubmissionFor the Fiscal Years 2008/09 and 2009/10964300

Support Benefits-Full-time 168,267 150,472 17,795 135,000 88,708 135,000 0 135,000 0 162,000 0 162,000Support Recoveries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Support Benefits-Part-time 8,052 5,935 2,117 13,000 3,100 13,000 0 13,000 0 13,000 0 13,000

Total - Support Benefits 176,319 156,407 19,912 148,000 91,808 148,000 0 148,000 0 175,000 0 175,000

Total - Support Salaries & Benefits 810,619 812,452 (1,833) 0.00 641,000 506,638 641,000 0 641,000 0 9.00 708,000 24,000 732,000 10.00

3. Teaching AssistantsGraduate Teaching Assistants 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00Undergraduate Teaching Assistants 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00Teaching Assistants Benefits 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total - TA Salaries & Benefits 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00

4. Hourly StaffHourly Staff (Wages) 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00Hourly Staff (Wages) Benefits 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total - Hourly Staff Salaries & Benefits 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00

Total Salaries & Wages 634,300 656,045 (21,745) 0.00 493,000 414,830 493,000 0 493,000 0 9.00 533,000 24,000 557,000 10.00

Total Benefits 176,319 156,407 19,912 148,000 91,808 148,000 0 148,000 0 175,000 0 175,000

Total of Salaries and Benefits 810,619 812,452 (1,833) 0.00 641,000 506,638 641,000 0 641,000 0 9.00 708,000 24,000 732,000 10.00

5. Non-Salary Expenses

Other supplies and expenses 390,021 440,572 (50,551) 357,000 199,733 380,951 0 380,951 (23,951) 241,600 0 241,600Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Library Acquisitions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Equipment and renovations 21,000 17,623 3,377 8,000 726 8,000 0 8,000 0 2,000 0 2,000Scholarships and bursaries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PDA/MPDA2,750 1,891 859 1,000 974 1,859 0 1,859 (859) 2,000 0 2,000

Total - Non-salary Expenses 413,771 460,086 (46,315) 366,000 201,433 390,810 0 390,810 (24,810) 245,600 0 245,600

Total Expenses 1,224,390 1,272,538 (48,148) 1,007,000 708,071 1,031,810 0 1,031,810 (24,810) 953,600 24,000 977,600

Operating Surplus (Deficit) (75,409) (22,120) 53,289 (21,680) (344,301) (75,539) 23,000 (52,539) (30,859) (11,000) 11,000 0

6. Analysis of Appropriations

May 1st Opening Balance 74,659 74,659 0 21,680 51,680 0 51,680 51,680 30,000 0 0 0PDA/MPDA Surplus/(Deficit) 750 0 (750) 0 859 0 859 859 859 0 0 0Operating Surplus/(Deficit) (75,409) (22,120) 53,289 (21,680) (344,301) (75,539) 23,000 (52,539) (30,859) (11,000) 11,000 0

April 30th Projected Balance 0 52,539 52,539 0 (291,762) (75,539) 75,539 0 0 (11,000) 11,000 0

C:\Documents and Settings\duartel\My Documents\MyFiles\SAS FM Report Template\SAS FM report template2/6/2009

Agenda Item 3d

Page 34: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

BUDGET SUBMISSION REVIEW CHECKLIST

Budget Envelope: Centre for Leadership in Learning

Envelope Manager: Peter Smith

Presentation/Submission Date: February 11, 2009

Due date January 28, 2009 Received date January 29, 2009 Timeliness

Date issued to Budget Committee: February 5, 2009 Timeliness

Yes Nox Was the correct format used? Completeness - ______________________________________

x Are there any anomalies? Reasonableness _________________________________________

x Do trends make sense? Reasonableness __________________________________________

Is the Budget Envelope balanced?

Surplus/(Deficit)Appropriation/

Reserve Balancex 2008/09 (584,676)$ 205,875$ x 2009/10 (205,875)$ -$

x Have FTE's been reported on the correct line?

Are the allocations correct?Approved Budgeted/Projected Variance

x 2008/09 Ongoing 1,574$ 1,574$ -$ One-time -$

x Total 1,574$ 1,574$ -$

x 2009/10 Ongoing 1,574$ 1,574$ -$ One-time -$

x Total 1,574$ 1,574$ -$

x Is follow-up required? If yes what was done?

Submission Highlights (Numerical Data) & Concerns:

New cost centre - MacLive (Elluminate - a self-funding online conferencing software) - solely dependent on forthcoming commitments byfaculties and administrative departments.

Variances

2008/09 Budget 2008/09 Projection 2009/10 Budget2008/09 Projectionvs 2008/09 Budget

2009/10 Budgetvs 2008/09 Projection

RevenueOperating allocation 1,522$ 1,574$ 1,574$ 52$ -$ Revenues - - Recoveries and transfers 170 54 458 (116) 404 Total sources of funding 1,692$ 1,628$ 2,032$ (64)$ 404$

ExpensesAcademic salaries/benefits -$ -$ Support salaries/benefits 1,551 1,408 1,713 143 (305) TA salaries/benefits - - Hourly wages/benefits - - Total salaries/benefits 1,551$ 1,408$ 1,713$ 143$ (305)$

Q:\Budget\Budget Committee\2005\Submissions\Budget Submission Checklist - CLL 2/5/2009 12:15 PM

Agenda Item 3e

Page 35: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Other supplies/expenses 716 805 525 (89) 280 Utilities - - Library acquisitions - - Equipment/renovations - - Scholarships/bursaries - - Total expenses 2,267$ 2,213$ 2,238$ 54$ (25)$

Operating surplus/(deficit) (575)$ (585)$ (206)$ (10)$ 379$

Ongoing surplus/(deficit) (352)$ (83)$ (352)$ 269$ One-time surplus/(deficit) (575) (233) (123) 342 110 Total operating surplus/(deficit) (575)$ (585)$ (206)$ (10)$ 379$

Explanations of major variances:

08/09 - Revenues - additional $50K added to envelope for LMS - transfer from Refining Directions less as expenses were less

08/09 - Salary/fb - unfilled vacancies08/09 - Other Exp. - LMS/Blackboard implementation09/10 - Revenues - transfer from Technology Fund re: Blackboard implementation & transfer to LMS09/10 - Salary/fb - full complement has been assumed in CLL and contracts extended in LTRC09/10 - Other Exp. - no Refining Directions grants to depts and one-time costs in LMS finished

Details of transfers and recoveries:

Amount$375,000

Budgeting Services Contact: Chris SylvesterDate Reviewed: 30-Jan-09

To/from envelope Other side budgeted?to CLL from Techn.Fund

Q:\Budget\Budget Committee\2005\Submissions\Budget Submission Checklist - CLL 2/5/2009 12:15 PM

Agenda Item 3e

Page 36: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

 

M E M O 

 

TO:  University Budget Committee 

iate Vice‐President (Academic) FROM:  Peter Smith, Assoc

E: DAT February 2, 2009 

E:  Centre for Leadership in Learning R

 

I am attaching  the 2009‐10 budget  for  the Centre  for Leadership  in Learning. The budget includes the Learning Technologies Resource Centre. 

The CLL is undergoing quite significant changes. I recently commissioned a review of the CLL and the report makes many recommendations on its future structure and mandate.  Following  planned  consultation  with  stakeholders,  many  of  these recommendations will  likely be acted upon. Budget  implications  are not  clear, but allowances have been made in the budget for two replacement full‐time hires for the two people who resigned from the CLL in the summer of 2008. 

The  LTRC,  on  its  part,  is  currently  implementing  the  new  Enterprise  Blackboard Learning  System  (to  be  known  as  ELM  –  eLearn  at  Mac),  which  will  replace  the ageing WebCT  and  LearnLink  systems.  ELM  is  a  considerably more  sophisticated system than the ones it replaces and its implementation and roll out, along with the training of users, will require additional resources. 

The  attached budget  is  projecting  a  $205,885  carry‐forward  from 2008‐09. These funds will be expensed over the 2009‐10 fiscal year to absorb the costs of contract personnel needed for the implementation of ELM. The budget projects no deficit at the  end  of  2009‐10.  However,  the  budget  assumes  a  transfer  of  $300,000 (US$219,184)  from  the  University  Technology  Fund  to  pay  the  costs  of  the Blackboard software license, as per the contract with the vendor. 

The attached notes from the Execute Director of LTRC provide further background n the individual components of the budget. o

 

Agenda Item 3e

Page 37: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

CLL/LTRC 2009/10 Budget Narrative

*All 2009/10 CLL budgets were based on a 0% base budget increase 2-21004 CLL Lacking information and time lines for hiring CLL staff, I have budgeted for a full complement of four FTE’s based on May 2008 levels. A small salary/benefit increment was added (2.5%) realizing that new staff would not likely be earning at the level of senior staff who have left the department. Expenses were reduced to offset the increase. There remains a $29,500 operational deficit which could be reduced considerably depending on the salary entry level of the two new hires. It is assumed in the 08/09 roll-over that new staff will not be on board until May 1/09. 2-21006 LTRC The large carry-forwards of previous years were reduced to zero in 09/10 with the hiring of 3 contract positions in 2007/08 for the Blackboard implementation. Two contracts were extended through September 2009 and one terminates on May 1, 2009. This was made possible with the addition of $75,000 from the Technology Fund approved for the 2009/10 budget year. An additional $100,500 will be transferred from the new MacLive cost centre to offset operating costs associated with the campus-wide administration of Elluminate. The operating deficit of $33,000 is a result of the LMS contracts. In order to reduce expenses to the projected level the part-time LTRC admin secretary position (91 hrs/month) will be eliminated saving $35,500. 2-21016 Learning Management System The contractual Blackboard licensing costs including the SQL database for 09/10 total $219,184 U.S. At current exchange and tax rates approx $300,000 Canadian will be required. (This money has yet to be allocated.) We are trying to do without an additional Blackboard engagement worth approx $30,000 U.S. Our staff currently feel the engagement is not necessary although Blackboard insist it is important for our success and continue to try to sell it to us. Small LMS hardware and operating software expenses will continue to be paid out of the LTRC account. The Blackboard payment is due April 1, 2009, however, we could probably push this to May 1 in order to fall within our fiscal calendar. Any unfavourable 2008/09 balance in this account is due to unpredictable U.S. exchange rates. The Blackboard contract was negotiated when the exchange was on par. There are several engagements still outstanding for 08/09. Outstanding Blackboard travel expenses will be accrued in the 2-21006 LTRC account *At this time the LearnLink (FirstClass) maintenance contract will not be renewed on July 1/09 pending a decision and timeline to shut it down or relocate the service to another department. The current plan calls to run LearnLink for another year without maintenance as courses and clients transition to Blackboard.

Agenda Item 3e

Page 38: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

2-21012 MacLive (new cost centre) MacLive is the name we have given to Elluminate which is a self-funding online conferencing software used for remote synchronous teaching and administrative conferencing. Currently a number of faculties and admin departments pay license fees based on the number of seats they anticipate using and the income is used to offset a yearly license fee plus LTRC support, maintenance and hardware. Last year $200,000 was pledged by faculties and departments to cover Elluminate costs and this was administered out of the technology fund since it was still a technology fund project using LTRC seconded staffing. The project has been very successful and has now gone live and is administered through the LTRC. Costs in 09/10 are anticipated to be $150,500. $50,000 will be expensed out of this account for licensing and 100,500 transferred to 2-21006 for LTRC support and expenses. The 09/10 model is based on 08/09 trends and is solely dependent on forthcoming commitments by faculties and administrative departments. 2-21015 Faculty Teaching Grants After the current small grant proposals are adjudicated it is estimated that 47,598 will carry over into 09/10 to add to the 44,500 allocation bringing available funds to 92,146. Grant money is disbursed through 2 rounds of large and small faculty grants for teaching and learning projects at McMaster. Small grants (base budget) come from this account and large grants from an Imperial Oil trust fund. 2-21017 Refining Directions This fund was previously used to further the goals of Refining Directions through a faculty/departmental application process. The available funds will cover 08/09 expenses and have been moved to a contingency fund in 09/10. 2-21018 STLHE This is a cost neutral account set up to run the on-campus STLHE office. STLHE reimburses the university on a quarterly basis for all expenses incurred.

Agenda Item 3e

Page 39: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Budget ActualFavourable/

(Unfavourable) FTE's BudgetYear-to-date

December 2008 On-going One-timeTotal

ProjectionFavourable/

(Unfavourable) FTE's On-going One-timeTotal

Budget FTE's

Sources of Funding

1. Operating AllocationBase Allocation 1,948,080 1,948,080 0 1,574,000 1,574,000 1,574,000 0 1,574,000 0 1,574,001 0 1,574,001Variable 0 0 0 0One-time 0 0 0 0

Total Allocation per Framework 1,948,080 1,948,080 0 1,574,000 1,574,000 1,574,000 0 1,574,000 0 1,574,001 0 1,574,001

2. RevenueGrants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other Income 20,000 18,155 (1,845) 17,500 12,064 16,750 0 16,750 (750) 131,531 0 131,531Donations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Revenues 20,000 18,155 (1,845) 17,500 12,064 16,750 0 16,750 (750) 131,531 0 131,531

3. RecoveriesRecoveries (Internal & External) 21,560 23,339 1,779 0 11,997 10,710 0 10,710 10,710 0 0 0

Total Recoveries 21,560 23,339 1,779 0 11,997 10,710 0 10,710 10,710 0 0 0

4. TransfersFICR and Other Research Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other Transfers (111,766) (73,432) 38,334 586,074 (15,725) 26,317 0 26,317 (559,757) 375,000 (47,596) 327,404

Total Transfers (111,766) (73,432) 38,334 586,074 (15,725) 26,317 0 26,317 (559,757) 375,000 (47,596) 327,404

Total Sources of Funding 1,877,874 1,916,142 38,268 2,177,574 1,582,336 1,627,777 0 1,627,777 (549,797) 2,080,532 (47,596) 2,032,936

Object of Expense

1. Academic SalariesAcademic Salary-Full-time 40,000 0 40,000 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00Academic Salary Recoveries 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00Contractually Limited Appointments 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00Permanent Teaching Track 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00CAWAR/Special 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00Academic Release Time 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00Academic Stipends 20,000 (2,063) 22,063 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00Academic Salaries-Part-time 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00

Total - Academic Salaries 60,000 (2,063) 62,063 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00

Academic BenefitsAcademic Benefits-Full-time 3,500 0 3,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Academic Benefits Recoveries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Academic Benefits-Part-time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total - Academic Benefits 3,500 0 3,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total - Academic Salaries & Benefits 63,500 (2,063) 65,563 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00

LEADERSHIP/LEARNINGBudget Review & SubmissionFor the Fiscal Years 2008/09 and 2009/10964400

Projection2007/08 2008/09

Budget2009/10

C:\Documents and Settings\strongb\My Documents\2009-10 Budget Committee Submission CLL.xls2/2/2009

Agenda Item 3e

Page 40: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Budget ActualFavourable/

(Unfavourable) FTE's BudgetYear-to-date

December 2008 On-going One-timeTotal

ProjectionFavourable/

(Unfavourable) FTE's On-going One-timeTotal

Budget FTE's

LEADERSHIP/LEARNINGBudget Review & SubmissionFor the Fiscal Years 2008/09 and 2009/10964400

Projection2007/08 2008/09

Budget2009/10

2. Support SalariesSupport Salaries-Full-time 1,007,249 923,109 84,140 15.50 1,123,000 703,658 999,901 0 999,901 123,099 18.50 1,201,748 0 1,201,748 18.00Support Salary Recoveries 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00

Support Salaries-Part-time 119,083 46,129 72,954 0.00 110,189 75,815 109,586 0 109,586 603 0.00 100,026 1,500 101,526 0.00Total - Support Salaries 1,126,332 969,237 157,095 15.50 1,233,189 779,474 1,109,487 0 1,109,487 123,702 18.50 1,301,774 1,500 1,303,274 18.00

Support BenefitsSupport Benefits-Full-time 309,002 269,501 39,501 344,765 190,792 284,315 0 284,315 60,450 397,273 0 397,273Support Recoveries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Support Benefits-Part-time 8,050 8,247 (197) 11,270 11,499 14,098 0 14,098 (2,828) 12,420 100 12,520

Total - Support Benefits 317,052 277,749 39,304 356,035 202,291 298,413 0 298,413 57,622 409,693 100 409,793

Total - Support Salaries & Benefits 1,443,384 1,246,986 196,398 15.50 1,589,224 981,764 1,407,900 0 1,407,900 181,324 18.50 1,711,467 1,600 1,713,067 18.00

3. Teaching AssistantsGraduate Teaching Assistants 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00Undergraduate Teaching Assistants 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00Teaching Assistants Benefits 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total - TA Salaries & Benefits 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00

4. Hourly StaffHourly Staff (Wages) 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00Hourly Staff (Wages) Benefits 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total - Hourly Staff Salaries & Benefits 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00

Total Salaries & Wages 1,186,332 967,175 219,157 15.50 1,233,189 779,474 1,109,487 0 1,109,487 123,702 18.50 1,301,774 1,500 1,303,274 18.00

Total Benefits 320,552 277,749 42,804 356,035 202,291 298,413 0 298,413 57,622 409,693 100 409,793

Total of Salaries and Benefits 1,506,884 1,244,923 261,961 15.50 1,589,224 981,764 1,407,900 0 1,407,900 181,324 18.50 1,711,467 1,600 1,713,067 18.00

5. Non-Salary Expenses

Other supplies and expenses 425,991 121,999 303,992 552,610 429,748 555,232 18,500 573,732 (21,122) 445,292 42,952 488,244Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Library Acquisitions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Equipment and renovations 244,698 58,388 186,310 325,620 192,303 14,000 214,317 228,317 97,303 3,500 31,000 34,500Scholarships and bursaries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PDA/MPDA4,432 4,410 22 3,000 901 2,504 0 2,504 496 3,000 0 3,000

Total - Non-salary Expenses 675,121 184,797 490,324 881,230 622,952 571,736 232,817 804,553 76,677 451,792 73,952 525,744

Total Expenses 2,182,005 1,429,720 752,285 2,470,454 1,604,716 1,979,636 232,817 2,212,453 258,001 2,163,259 75,552 2,238,811

Operating Surplus (Deficit) (304,131) 486,422 790,553 (292,880) (22,380) (351,859) (232,817) (584,676) (291,796) (82,727) (123,148) (205,875)

6. Analysis of Appropriations

May 1st Opening Balance 302,699 302,699 0 292,858 790,532 0 790,529 790,529 497,671 0 205,875 205,875PDA/MPDA Surplus/(Deficit) 1,432 1,432 0 22 22 0 22 22 0 0 0 0Operating Surplus/(Deficit) (304,131) 486,422 790,553 (292,880) (22,380) (351,859) (232,817) (584,676) (291,796) (82,727) (123,148) (205,875)

April 30th Projected Balance 0 790,553 790,553 0 768,174 (351,859) 557,734 205,875 205,875 (82,727) 82,727 0

C:\Documents and Settings\strongb\My Documents\2009-10 Budget Committee Submission CLL.xls2/2/2009

Agenda Item 3e

Page 41: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

TO: Budget Committee DATE: January 27, 2009 FROM: Peter Smith Chair, University Student Fees Committee RE: 2009/10 Tuition Fees and Miscellaneous Fees

Attached are the proposed Tuition and Miscellaneous Fees for 2009/10. The tuition fees for Ministry funded programs comply with The Guidelines for Implementation of the Tuition Fee Policy for Publicly-Assisted Universities dated March 13, 2006. The Miscellaneous Fees comply with the Compulsory Ancillary Fee Protocol Guidelines of the Ministry of Education and Training, dated June 8, 1994, and all agreements that McMaster has with student groups. It should be noted that we are recommending tuition rates for 2009/10 following the motion approved by the Board of Governors in May 2006 that read:

That the University implements tuition fees for Ministry funded programs according to Ministry guidelines for 2007/08, 2008/09, and 2009/10. We are seeking approval of the following recommendations:

1. That the 2009/10 tuition fees be recommended as detailed in Appendix A. 2. That the 2009/10 Miscellaneous Fee Schedule be recommended as detailed in

Appendix B.

Agenda Item 3f

Page 42: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

TUITION AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES

MCMASTER UNIVERSITY 2009/10

Background On March 13, 2006 the Government of Ontario provided Universities with the Guidelines for Implementation of the Tuition Fee Policy for Publicly-Assisted Universities, 2006/07 to 2009/10 which provided a framework for 2006/07 through 2009/10. Tuition fees for students for whom McMaster is funded by the Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities (MTCU) will be regulated during this time period. The government also announced significant changes to student financial aid including the Student Access Guarantee (SAG) that will assist OSAP eligible students to access postsecondary education. The Provincial Government had previously imposed a two-year tuition fee freeze for 2004/5 and 2005/6 for Canadian citizens and Landed Immigrants in regulated programs. These programs are defined by MTCU as “Arts & Science and Other” programs that at McMaster include most BA, BA Hons, BSc, BSc Hons, BASc, BHSc programs, and “Professional and Graduate” programs that include BCom, BEng and most Masters and PhD programs. The Medicine program tuition fee guidelines are considered to be the same as “Professional and Graduate”. The freeze did not apply to (1) international students, for whom the University received no Ministry funding, and who therefore are subject to differential fees or to (2) cost-recovery programs that do not receive Ministry funding such as various Graduate Diplomas. Under the 2006/07 – 2009/10 Framework, the University governing boards may increase regulated tuition fees subject to several constraints:

• Tuition fees for Level 1 students in “Arts & Science and Other” programs may increase by a maximum of 4.5%

• Tuition fees for Level 2 and above students in “Arts & Science and Other” programs may increase by a maximum of 4%

• Tuition fees for Level 1 students in “Professional and Graduate” programs may increase by a maximum of 8%

• Tuition fees for Level 2 and above students in “Professional and Graduate” programs may increase by a maximum of 4%

• Overall the average annual increase in tuition fees for all eligible students at McMaster may not be more than 5%. This value is calculated by multiplying

Agenda Item 3f

Page 43: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

every program’s year-over-year tuition fee increase in percent by every program’s current year FTE enrolment. These results are added together and then divided by the total FTE enrolment.

PROPOSAL FOR 2009/10 Tuition Fees The Board of Governors approved a motion in May 2006 that the University implement tuition fees for Ministry funded programs according to Ministry guidelines for 2008/09, 2008/09 and 2009/10. The overall average increase in tuition fees for 2009/10 does not exceed the 5% cap imposed by the Provincial Government guidelines. Proposed Tuition Increases for 2009/10 (Appendix A) Domestic Students (Appendix A Tables 1 and 3)

- Level 1 undergraduate tuition in “Arts & Science and Other” programs increases by 4.5%

- Level 2 and above undergraduate tuition in “Arts & Science and Other” programs increases by 4%

- Level 1 undergraduate tuition in “Professional” programs increases by 8% - Level 2 and above undergraduate tuition in “Professional” programs increases by

4% - Level 1 Medicine tuition increases by 6% (maximum allowed is 8%). This

decision was reached because the University will be providing lower bursaries to medical students beginning in 2009/10.

- Level 2 and above Medicine tuition increases by 4% - Level 1 Midwifery by 7% - Level 2 and above Midwifery by 4% - Levels 1 Graduate tuition increases by 8% with the exception of Advanced

Design and Manufacturing, UNENE (University Network of Excellence in Nuclear Engineering) – increased by 0%. These are determined in accordance with participating institutions.

- Level 2 and above Graduate tuition increases by 4%

Agenda Item 3f

Page 44: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

International Students (Appendix A Tables 2 and 4)

- All levels of International undergraduate tuition increases by 6%. - International graduate student tuition increases by 6% with the exception of some

programs where the market demand will not permit this increase. Note: Some fees have been adjusted to whole numbers, or to values that divide equally into appropriate terms or unit numbers resulting in a percentage increase that may be marginally less than the nominal amount. Cost Recovery Tuition (Appendix A Tables 5 and 6) These programs do not receive Ministry funding and are not governed by their guidelines. The University Student Fees Committee recommends that the Budget Committee recommend the following motion:

That the 2009/10 tuition fees be recommended as detailed in Appendix A.

Miscellaneous Fees There are two types of Miscellaneous Student Fees that are detailed in Appendix B.

1) Mandatory Supplementary Fees are collected with tuition. Some are remitted to

Student Organizations such as the McMaster Student Union (MSU) and the Graduate Student Association (GSA) and others are for university student services. These fees can only increase by Consumer Price Index (CPI) unless a membership referendum is held according to the Ministry Protocol and agreements in place at McMaster. CPI has been calculated at 2.3% (rounded to the nearest cent) which is the annual All Ontario CPI inflation rate.

2) Fees charged by the University as Incurred can change based on recommendations

from the area responsible for providing the service. The recommendation must clearly outline the need for the change and be recommended by the Fees Committee and Budget Committee for approval of the Finance Committee and Board of Governors. A brief summary of the rationale for any proposed introduction of new fees or changes to these types of fees has been noted on Appendix B.

The University Student Fees Committee recommends that the Budget Committee recommend the following motion:

That the 2009/10 Miscellaneous Fee Schedule be recommended as detailed in Appendix B.

Agenda Item 3f

Page 45: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Centre for Continuing Education (CCE) Tuition Fees for 2009/10 The 2009/10 CCE Fee Schedule is not included. It was previously submitted for approval.

Agenda Item 3f

Page 46: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

APPENDIX A

% 2008-09 2008-09 % 2009-10 2009-10

Name FacultyIncrease 2008-

09 Tuition Fee per UnitIncrease 2009-10 Tuition Fee per Unit

Engineering Level 1 Engineering 8% 6,765.99 205.03 8% 7,307.19 221.43Engineering Level 2 Engineering 4% 6,515.19 197.43 4% 6,775.89 205.33Engineering Level 3 Engineering 4% 6,273.96 190.12 4% 6,524.76 197.72Engineering Level 4 Engineering 4% 6,041.64 183.08 4% 6,283.20 190.40Computer Science Level 1 (new 07/08) Engineering 8% 4,874.70 162.49 8% 5,264.70 175.49Computer Science Level 2 (new 07/08) Engineering 4% 4,694.10 156.47 4% 4,881.90 162.73Eng. Mgmt. II Engineering 4% 5,562.90 185.43 4% 5,785.50 192.85Eng. Mgmt. III Engineering 4% 6,041.64 183.08 4% 6,283.20 190.40Eng. Mgmt. IV Engineering 4% 5,562.90 185.43 4% 5,785.50 192.85Eng. Mgmt. V Engineering 4% 6,041.64 183.08 4% 6,283.20 190.40

B. Tech. Level 1 Engineering 8%486 per course 162.00 8%

524.88 per course 174.96

B. Tech Level 2 and above Engineering 4%468 per course 156.00 4%

486.72 per course 162.24

B.Sc. Level 1 Science 4.5% 4,716.60 157.22 4.5% 4,928.70 164.29B.Sc. Level 2 Science 4.0% 4,694.10 156.47 4.0% 4,881.90 162.73B.Sc. Level 3 Science 4% 4,671.60 155.72 4% 4,858.50 161.95B.Sc. Level 4 Science 4% 4,649.10 154.97 4% 4,835.10 161.17B.A. Level 1 Social Sciences 4.5% 4,716.60 157.22 4.5% 4,928.70 164.29B.A. Level 2 Social Sciences 4.0% 4,694.10 156.47 4.0% 4,881.90 162.73B.A. Level 3 Social Sciences 4% 4,671.60 155.72 4% 4,858.50 161.95B.A. Level 4 Social Sciences 4% 4,649.10 154.97 4% 4,835.10 161.17B.A. Level 1 Humanities 4.5% 4,716.60 157.22 4.5% 4,928.70 164.29B.A. Level 2 Humanities 4.0% 4,694.10 156.47 4.0% 4,881.90 162.73B.A. Level 3 Humanities 4% 4,671.60 155.72 4% 4,858.50 161.95B.A. Level 4 Humanities 4% 4,649.10 154.97 4% 4,835.10 161.17B. Com. Level 1 Business 8% 5,702.10 190.07 8% 6,158.40 205.28B. Com. Level 2 Business 4% 5,490.90 183.03 4% 5,710.50 190.35B. Com. Level 3 Business 4% 5,287.50 176.25 4% 5,499.00 183.30B. Com. Level 4 Business 4% 5,091.60 169.72 4% 5,295.30 176.51B. HSc. Level 1 Health Sciences 4.5% 4,716.60 157.22 4.5% 4,928.70 164.29B. HSc. Level 2 Health Sciences 4.0% 4,694.10 156.47 4.0% 4,881.90 162.73B. HSc. Level 3 Health Sciences 4% 4,671.60 155.72 4% 4,858.50 161.95B. HSc. Level 4 Health Sciences 4% 4,649.10 154.97 4% 4,835.10 161.17

Medicine 1 Health Sciences 8% 18,195.84 n/a 6% 19,287.59 n/aMedicine 2 Health Sciences 4% 16,872.96 n/a 4% 17,547.88 n/aMedicine 3 Health Sciences 4% 16,247.80 n/a 4% 16,897.71 n/aMidwifery 1 * Health Sciences 7% 5,187.42 n/a 7% 5,550.54 n/aMidwifery 2 * Health Sciences 4% 5,041.97 n/a 4% 5,243.65 n/aMidwifery 3 * Health Sciences 4% 4,900.61 n/a 4% 5,096.64 n/aMidwifery 4 * Health Sciences 4% 4,763.21 n/a 4% 4,953.74 n/aNursing Level 1 Health Sciences 4.5% 4,716.60 157.22 4.5% 4,928.70 164.29Nursing Level 2 Health Sciences 4.0% 4,694.10 156.47 4.0% 4,881.90 162.73Nursing Level 3 Health Sciences 4% 4,671.60 155.72 4% 4,858.50 161.95Nursing Level 4 Health Sciences 4% 4,649.10 154.97 4% 4,835.10 161.17

Physican Assistant Level 1 (3 terms) Health Sciences 9,000.00 4% 9,360.00*special funding not biuJanuary 27 2009

Undergraduate Programs

Tuition Fees Proposedfor Graduate and Undergraduate Students

April 2009

Table 1 - Domestic Student Tuition Fees 2009/10

Tuition Fees 2009/10Appendix A

Page 1 of 7

Agenda Item 3f

Page 47: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

% 2008-09 2008-09 % 2009-10 2009-10Name Faculty Increase Tuition Fee per Unit Increase Tuition Fee per Unit

Engineering all Levels Engineering 6% 18,873.36 571.92 6% 20,005.92 606.24

Computer Science all Levels (new 07/08) Engineering 6% 13,725.00 457.50 6% 14,548.50 484.95Eng. Mgmt. II, IV Engineering 6% 18,873.30 629.11 6% 20,005.80 666.86Eng. Mgmt. III, V Engineering 6% 18,873.36 571.92 6% 20,005.92 606.24

B. Tech.(new) all levels Engineering 6%1548.48 per

course 515.16 6%1638.21 per

course 546.07B.Sc. All Levels Science 6% 13,725.00 457.50 6% 14,548.50 484.95B.A. all Levels Social Sciences 6% 12,071.40 402.38 6% 12,795.60 426.52B.A. all Levels Humanities 6% 12,071.40 402.38 6% 12,795.60 426.52B. Com. All Levels Business 6% 14,252.70 475.09 6% 15,108.00 503.60B. HSc. All Levels Health Sciences 6% 14,455.50 481.85 6% 15,322.80 510.76Nursing all Levels Health Sciences 6% 14,455.50 481.85 6% 15,322.80 510.76Medicine 1 Health Sciences 6% 96,605.22 n/a 6% 102,401.53 n/aMedicine 2 Health Sciences 6% 96,605.22 n/a 6% 102,401.53 n/aMedicine 3 Health Sciences 6% 49,647.57 n/a 106% 102,401.53 n/a

Note: These fees are not MTCU funded and are not bound by the Guidelines

January 27 2009

Table 2 - International Student Tuition Fees 2009/10Undergraduate Programs

Tuition Fees 2009/10 Appendix APage 2 of 7

Agenda Item 3f

Page 48: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

2008-09 % 2008-09 2009-10 % 2009-10

Name Faculty Increase Increase Tuition Fee Increase Increase Tuition FeeAdvanced Design and Manufacturing Institute - McMaster University is collaborating with the University of Toronto, the University of Waterloo, and the University of Western Ontario to offer a Master's Degree in Design and Manufacturing. The program involves the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the School of Business, as well as the engineering business schools at Toronto, Waterloo and Western. It also draws on Materials and Manufacturing Ontario, a research Centre of Excellence in which McMaster is a partner. Collectively the group forms a virtual institute known as the Advanced Design and Manufacturing Institute (ADMI). (Fees consistent with other participating universities) Engineering 0.00 0%

2,500 per half course 0.00 0% 2,500.00

UNENE M.Eng. - The University Network of Excellence in Nuclear Engineering (per half course) (fees in accordance with other participating institutions) Engineering 0.00 0%

2,500 per 1/2 course 0.00 0% 2,500.00

* Master of Communications Management (per course) Business 0.00 0%$3,000 per

course 0.00 0%$3,000 per

course

MEEI - Full-time - Master of Engineering Entrepreneurship and Innovation (per term) Engineering 0.00 0% 4,800.00 192.00 4% 4,992.00MEEI - Part-time - Master of Engineering Entrepreneurship and Innovation (per term) Engineering 0.00 0% 2,400.00 96.00 4% 2,496.00

MEPP - Full-time Master of Engineering and Public Policy offered through The McMaster School for Engineering Practice (MSEP) (new program 2004/05) (per term) Engineering 0.00 0% 4,175.00 167.00 4% 4,342.00MEPP - Part-time, Master of Engineering and Public Policy (new program 2004/05) (per term) Engineering 0.00 0% 2,143.00 86.00 4% 2,229.00M Eng Design - Full-time Master of Engineering Design offered through The McMaster School for Engineering Practice (MSEP) (new program Sept 2007) (per term) Engineering 0.00 0% 4,175.00 167.00 4% 4,342.00M Eng Design - Part-time Master of Engineering Design (new program Sept 2007) (per term) Engineering 0.00 0% 2,143.00 86.00 4% 2,229.00MBA - Full-time (per term) - Level 1 Business 0.00 0% 5,600.00 448.00 8% 6,048.00MBA - Full-time (per term) - Level 2 Business 0.00 0% 5,600.00 224.00 4% 5,824.00MBA - Part-time (per one term course) - Level 1 Business 0.00 0% 1,400.00 112.00 8% 1,512.00MBA - Part-time (per one term course) - Level 2 Business 0.00 0% 1,400.00 56.00 4% 1,456.00MSc (OT) - Master of Clinical Health Sciences, Occupational Therapy offered through the Faculty of Health Sciences Graduate Programs and the School of Rehabilitation Science - all levels (per term) Health Sciences 0.00 0% 2,500.00 100.00 4% 2,600.00MSc (PT)- Master of Clinical Health Sciences, Physiotherapy offered through the Faculty of Health Sciences Graduate Programs and the School of Rehabilitation Science - all levels (per term) Health Sciences 0.00 0% 2,500.00 100.00 4% 2,600.00MSc (OT) Rehabilition Science On-line - The online, course based option is web-based, and offered in partnership with the School of Rehabilitation Science, University of British Columbia. Health Sciences 0.00 0%

1200 per 1/2 course 50.00 4% 1,250.00

MSc (PT) Rehabilition Science On-line - The online, course based option is web-based, and offered in partnership with the School of Rehabilitation Science, University of British Columbia. Health Sciences 0.00 0%

1,200 per 1/2 course 50.00 4% 1,250.00

Graduate Programs Level 1 - Table 7 - (per term) 0.00 0% 1,718.00 137.00 8% 1,855.00Graduate Programs Level 2 - Table 7 - (per term) 0.00 0% 1,718.00 69.00 4% 1,787.00Graduate Programs Level 3 - Table 7 - (per term) 63.00 3.8% 1,718.00 69.00 4% 1,787.00Graduate Programs Level 4 - Table 7 - (per term) 124.00 4% 1,718.00 69.00 4% 1,787.00Graduate Programs Level 5 - Table 7 - (per term) 64.00 4% 1,658.00 66.00 4% 1,724.00Graduate Programs Level 1 - Table 7 - (Annual) 0.00 0% 5,154.00 411.00 8% 5,565.00Graduate Programs Level 2 - Table 7 - (Annual) 0.00 0% 5,154.00 207.00 4% 5,361.00Graduate Programs Levels 3 - Table 7 - (Annual) 190.00 3.8% 5,154.00 207.00 4.0% 5,361.00Graduate Programs Levels 4 - Table 7 - (Annual) 372.00 4% 5,154.00 207.00 4% 5,361.00Graduate Programs Levels 5 - Table 7 - (Annual) 192.00 4% 4,974.00 198.00 4% 5,172.00Graduate Programs Level 1 Part Time - Table 7 - (per term) 0.00 0% 859.00 69.00 8% 928.00Graduate Programs Level 2 Part Time - Table 7 - (per term) 0.00 0% 859.00 34.00 4% 893.00Graduate Programs Levels 3 Part Time - Table 7 - (per term) 32.00 3.8% 859.00 34.00 4.0% 893.00Graduate Programs Levels 4 Part Time - Table 7 - (per term) 62.00 4% 859.00 34.00 4% 893.00Graduate Programs Levels 5 Part Time - Table 7 - (per term) 32.00 4% 829.00 33.00 4% 862.00

Graduate Programs Level 1 Part Time - Table 7 - (Annual) 0.00 0% 2,577.00 207.00 8% 2,784.00Graduate Programs Level 2 Part Time - Table 7 - (Annual) 0.00 0% 2,577.00 102.00 4% 2,679.00Graduate Programs Level 3 Part Time - Table 7 - (Annual) 96.00 3.9% 2,577.00 102.00 4.0% 2,679.00Graduate Programs Level 4 Part Time - Table 7 - (Annual) 186.00 4% 2,577.00 102.00 4% 2,679.00Graduate Programs Levels 5 Part Time - Table 7 - (Annual) 96.00 4% 2,487.00 99.00 4% 2,586.00Note: These programs are funded by the MTCU and are bound by the Guidelines* - exception -- this program is NOT MTCU funded

Table 3 - Domestic Student Tuition Fees 2009/10Graduate Programs

Tuition Fees 2009/10Appendix A

Page 3 of 7

Agenda Item 3f

Page 49: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

2008-09 % 2008-09 2009-10 % 2009-10Name Faculty Increase Increase Tuition Fee Increase Increase Tuition Fee

Advanced Design and Manufacturing Institute - McMaster University is collaborating with the University of Toronto, the University of Waterloo, and the University of Western Ontario to offer a Master's Degree in Design and Manufacturing. The program involves the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the School of Business, as well as the engineering business schools at Toronto, Waterloo and Western. It also draws on Materials and Manufacturing Ontario, a research Centre of Excellence in which McMaster is a partner. Collectively the group forms a virtual institute known as the Advanced Design and Manufacturing Institute (ADMI). (Fees consistent with other participating universities) Engineering 0 0%

2,500 per half course 0 0% 2,500

UNENE M.Eng. (per half course) The University Network of Excellence in Nuclear Engineering (UNENE) is an alliance of universities, nuclear power utilities, research and regulatory agencies for the support and development of nuclear education, research and development capability in Canadian universities. It is a course based Master's degree for the working professional. The UNENE educational program is a graduate studies program now awaiting Ontario Council of Graduate Studies accreditation. It is a joint course-based Master's of Engineering program in Nuclear Engineering offered by McMaster, Queen's, Toronto, Waterloo and Western. (Fees in accordance with other participating universities) Engineering 0 0%

$2,500 per 1/2 course 0 0% 2,500

Master of Communications Management (per course) Business 0 0%$3,000 per

course 0 0%$3,000 per

courseMEEI Full-time (per term) - Master of Engineering Entrepreneurship and Innovation offered through The McMaster School for Engineering Practice (MSEP) Engineering 0 0%

7,200 per term 432 6% 7,632

MEEI Part-time (per term) - Master of Engineering Entrepreneurship and Innovation Engineering 0 0%

3,600 per term 216 6% 3,816

MEPP - Full-time (per term) Master of Engineering and Public Policy offered through The McMaster School for Engineering Practice (MSEP) (new program 2004/05) Engineering 0 0%

4,175 per term 250 6% 4,425

MEPP - Part-time (per term), Master of Engineering and Public Policy (new program 2004/05) Engineering 0 0%

2,143 per term 129 6% 2,272

M Eng Design - Full-time (per term) Master of Engineering Design offered through The McMaster School for Engineering Practice (MSEP) (new program Sept 2007) Engineering 0 0%

4,175 per term 250 6% 4,425

M Eng Design - Part-time (per term) Master of Engineering Design (new program Sept 2007) Engineering 0 0%

2,143 per term 129 6% 2,272

MBA - Full-time (per term) - all levels Business 0 0% 11,700.00 300 2.6% 12,000.00MBA - Part-time (per one term course) - all levels Business 0 0% 2,925.00 75 2.6% 3,000.00MSc (OT) (per term) - Master of Clinical Health Sciences, Occupational Therapy offered through the Faculty of Health Sciences Graduate Programs and the School of Rehabilitation Science. Health Sciences 0 0% 8,333.00 0 0% 8,333.00MSc (OT) (Annual) - Master of Clinical Health Sciences, Occupational Therapy Health Sciences 0 0% 25,000.00 0 0% 25,000.00MSc (PT) (per term) - Master of Clinical Health Sciences, Physiotherapy offered through the Faculty of Health Sciences Graduate Programs and the School of Rehabilitation Science. Health Sciences 0 0% 8,333.00 0 0% 8,333.00MSc (PT) (Annual) - Master of Clinical Health Sciences, Physiotherapy Health Sciences 0 0% 25,000.00 0 0% 25,000.00MSc (OT) MSc Rehabilition Science On-line - The online, course based option is web-based, and offered in partnership with the School of Rehabilitation Science, University of British Columbia. Health Sciences 0 0%

2,000 per 1/2 course 0 0%

2,000 per 1/2 course

MSc (PT) MSc Rehabilition Science On-line - The online, course based optionis web-based, and offered in partnership with the School of Rehabilitation Science, University of British Columbia. Health Sciences 0 0%

2,000 per 1/2 course 0 0%

2,000 per 1/2 course

Graduate Programs Level 1 - Table 7 - (per term) 0 0% 4,175.00 251 6% 4,426.00Graduate Programs Levels 2 and above - Table 7 - (per term) 0 0% 4,175.00 251 6% 4,426.00

Graduate Programs Level 1 - Table 7 - (Annual) 0 0% 12,525.00 752 6% 13,278.00Graduate Programs Levels 2 and above - Table 7 - (Annual) 0 0% 12,525.00 752 6% 13,278.00

Graduate Programs Level 1 Part Time - Table 7 - (per term) 0 0% 2,143.00 129 6% 2,272.00Graduate Programs Levels 2 and above Part Time - Table 7 - (per term) 0 0% 2,143.00 129 6% 2,272.00

0 0% 6%Graduate Programs Level 1 Part Time - Table 7 - (Annual) 0 0% 6,429.00 386 6% 6,816.00Graduate Programs Levels 2 and above Part Time - Table 7 - (Annual) 0 0% 6,429.00 386 6% 6,816.00

Note: These fees are not MTCU funded and are not bound by the Guidelines

Table 4 - International Student Tuition Fees 2009/10Graduate Programs

Tuition Fees 2009/10 Appendix APage 4 of 7

Agenda Item 3f

Page 50: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

2008-09 % 2008-09 2009-10 % 2009-10Name of Diploma Faculty Increase Increase Tuition Fee Increase Increase Tuition Fee

Generic Post-Degree Diploma Programs* (cost per course) These fees are the same as the Graduate Program Level 1 part-time fees 0 0% 859 69 8.0% 928

Diploma Program in Masonry: Material and Design. * This is offered through the Department of Civil Engineering. This diploma program provides in-depth coverage of properties of masonry materials and design of masonry components and complete buildings, including use of advanced analytical and design tools. Engineering 0 0%

1,500 per 1/2 course 0 0.0% 1,500

Nuclear Technology* - The Department of Engineering Physics offers a Graduate Diploma Program in Nuclear Technology Engineering 0 0% 950 0 0.0% 950

Rehabilitation of Civil Engineering Structures* - The Department of Civil Engineering offers a Graduate Diploma Program in Rehabilitation of Civil Engineering Structures. Rehabilitation of civil engineering structures is an important and growing sector of the construction industry. Engineering 0 0%

1,500 per 1/2 course 0 0.0% 1,500

Management of Innovation of New Technology* - The DeGroote School of Business offers two graduate diplomas in the Management of Innovation and New Technology called, respectively, Graduate Diploma in the Management of Innovation and New Technology and Advanced Graduate Diploma in the Management of Innovation and New Technology. Business 0 0% 1,400 0 0% 1,400

Health Services and Policy Research* - Graduate Diploma in Health Services and Policy Research. This is taken in conjuction with another degree. The one-time fee is charged upon admittance and is equal to two terms. Health Sciences 0 0% 3,436.90 137.48 4.0% 3,574.38

Advanced Neonatal Nursing - The McMaster Graduate Diploma Program in Advanced Neonatal Nursing is a graduate level advanced nursing practice specialty program offered within the Faculty of Health Sciences and sponsored by the Office of the Associate Dean of Graduate Studies (Health Sciences). Health Sciences 0 0% 10,816 0 0% 10,816

Note: These fees are not MTCU funded and are not bound by the Guidelines

Table 5 - Domestic Student Tuition Fees 2009/10Graduate Diploma Programs

Tuition Fees 2009/10 Appendix APage 5 of 7

Agenda Item 3f

Page 51: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

2008-09 % 2008-09 2009-10 % 2009-10Name of Diploma Faculty Increase Increase Tuition Fee Increase Increase Tuition Fee

** Clinical Behavioural Sciences (CBS) - Post-Baccalaureate Diploma and Selected Studies Program are offered through Continuing Health Sciences Education Health Sciences 8.10 2% 413.10 0.00 0% 413.10*** Clinical Behavioural Sciences (CBS) international fees for non domestic students Health Sciences 25.18 2% 1,284.09 0.00 0% 1,284.09Child Life Studies - The Child Life Studies Program, within the Faculty of Health Sciences, offers an eight month (September to April) full-time post-professional diploma program and part-time (non-diploma) on-line distance learning courses for professional development. Health Sciences 0.00 0% 5,151.30 0.00 0% 5,151.30*** Child Life Studies - The Child Life Studies Program international fees for non-domestic students Health Sciences 245.30 2% 12,695.30 0.00 0% 12,695.30Environmental Health - through McMaster Institute of Environment and Health Science 0.00 0% 5,344.80 0.00 0% 5,344.80

Nursing Oncology - In order to accommodate the educational needs of registered nurses working in pediatric oncology, a program has been developed within the context of the existing post-diploma stream. All candidates must reside in Ontario and be registered to practice nursing by the College of Nurses of Ontario. Two streams - Adult and Pediatric. Oncology Program Office in Health Sciences Centre. Health Sciences 0 0% 3,640.00 0 0% 3,640.00

Occupational Health - This is offered by Health Sciences through the Occupational Health and Environmental Medicine Department. Health Sciences 0 0% 4,736.88 263.12 5.5% 5,000.00

Psychiatric-Mental Health Nursing Certificate Program - This program has been established to provide registered nurses working with mental health patients the opportunity to develop enhanced knowledge and skills required to meet the challenges associated with their evolving roles. Key aspects of the program include professional role development, evidence based practice and development of skills relevant to assessment, communication, supportive care and collaborative practice. Health Sciences 0 0% 189.09 per unt 0 0% 189.09 per untTechnology Leadership Program (new program 2007/08) Engineering 75.00 16.7% 525 per course 21.00 4.0% 546****Courses for Professional Designations Business 30 5% 630 per course 170 27% $800 per course

** MTCU funded

****Note this has been submitted through CCE in the past and is a per course tuition amount. These are courses managed and offered out of Business.

Note: These fees are not MTCU funded and are not bound by the Guidelines

*** CBS and CLS are the only diploma program with an international fee

Table 6 - Domestic and International Student Tuition Fees 2009/10Undergraduate Diploma Programs

Tuition Fees 2009/10 Appendix APage 6 of 7

Agenda Item 3f

Page 52: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

Table 7 - Graduate Programs 2009/10

Anthropology M.A., Ph.D.Biochemistry M.Sc., Ph.D.Biology M.Sc., Ph.D.Biomedical Engineering M.A.Sc., Ph.D.Business Administration M.B.A., M.C.M, Ph.D.Chemical Biology M.Sc., Ph.D.Chemical Engineering M.A.Sc., M.Eng., Ph.D. Chemistry M.Sc., Ph.D.Civil Engineering M.A.Sc., M.Eng., Ph.D. Classics M.A., Ph.D.Communications Management M.CMComputational Engineering and Science M.A.Sc., M.Eng., M.Sc., Ph.D.Computer Science M.Sc., Ph.D.Cultural Studies & Critical Theory M.A.Earth and Environmental Sciences M.Sc., Ph.D.Economics / Economic Policy M.A., Ph.D.eHealth M.Sc.Electrical and Computer Engineering M.A.Sc., M.Eng., Ph.D. Engineering Design M. Eng. DesignEngineering Entrepreneurship and Innovation M.E.E.I.Engineering Physics M.A.Sc., M.Eng., Ph.D. Engineering and Public Policy M.Eng.English M.A., Ph.D. French M.A.Geography M.A., M.Sc., Ph.D. Globalization M.A.Health and Aging M.A.Health Policy Ph.D.Health and Radiation Physics M.Sc.Health Research Methodology M.Sc., Ph.D.History M.A., Ph.D.Kinesiology M.Sc., Ph.D. MD/PhD PhDManufacturing Engineering M. Eng. ManufacturingMaterials Engineering M.A.Sc., Ph.D. Materials Science M.Sc., Ph.D.Mathematics M.Sc., Ph.D. Mechanical Engineering M.A.Sc., ADMI M. Eng., Ph.D. Medical Sciences M.Sc., Ph.D.Neuroscience M.Sc., Ph.D.Nursing M.Sc., Ph.D.Occupational Therapy M.Sc. (OT)Philosophy M.A., Ph.D.Physics and Astronomy M.Sc., Ph.D.Physiotherapy M.Sc. (OT)Political Science M.A., Ph.D.Psychology M.Sc., Ph.D.Radiation Sciences (Medical Physics/Radiation Biology) M.Sc., Ph.D.Rehabilitation Science M.Sc., Ph.D.Religious Studies M.A., Ph.D.Social Work M.S.W., Ph.D.Sociology M.A., Ph.D.Software Engineering M.A.Sc., M.Eng., Ph.D. Statistics M.Sc.Work and Society M.A.

January 27 2009

McMaster University offers the following graduate degree programs:

Tuition Fees 2009/10 Appendix APage 7 of 7

Agenda Item 3f

Page 53: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

APPENDIX BMcMaster UNIVERSITY

MISCELLANEOUS FEES2009/2010

Owner Notes 2008/09 2009/10 % Change1 Mandatory Supplementary Fees

a) Collected On Behalf Of And Remitted To Student Organizations

Undergraduate - All Full-Time Students MSU - Organization Fee MSU 2 108.55 111.05 2.3% MSU - Ancillary Fee for CFMU-FM MSU 2 15.93 16.30 2.3% MSU - Ancillary Fee for Marmor MSU 2 8.29 8.48 2.3% MSU - WUSC Student Refugee Students MSU 2 1.34 1.37 2.3% MSU - H.S.R. Bus Pass Fee MSU 5 94.80 n/a MSU - University Centre (MUSC) (per unit to max 30 units) MSU 2 2.92 2.99 2.3% MSU - Incite Publication MSU 2 0.86 0.88 2.3% MSU - Health Insurance Plan MSU 6 45.00 n/a MSU - Dental MSU 6 95.00 n/a

MSU Health Insurance - Child Life Studies MSU 6 75.00 n/aMSU Health Insurance - Midwifery MSU 6 75.00 n/aMSU Health and Dental Insurance - Medicine MSU 6 170.00 n/a

Ontario Public Interest Research Group H Schayer 2 6.88 7.04 2.3%

McMaster Solar Car Project Proj Mngr 1 1.00 1.00 0.0%

Undergraduate - Specific Full-Time StudentsArts & Science Students Society Society 3 28.00 28.00 0.0%Bachelor of Kinesiology Society Society Fee 7 15.00 0.00 n/a Experiential Education Initiative 7 35.00 0.00 n/aBachelor of Health Sciences Society Society 3 26.00 26.00 0.0%Commerce Students Society Society Society Fee 8 24.53 32.50 32.5% Career Resource Centre 3 75.00 75.00 0.0% Allen Gould Trading Floor Fee (per term) 3 15.00 15.00 0.0% Business Employment Service Fee 3 55.00 55.00 0.0%Engineering Society Society Society Fee 1 82.00 82.00 0.0% Endowment 1 50.00 50.00 0.0%Humanities Students Society Society 3 15.62 15.62 0.0%Medical Students Society Society 1 82.00 82.00 0.0%Nursing Students Society Society 2 30.50 31.20 2.3%Science Students Society Society Society Fee 1 10.00 10.00 0.0% Career and Coop Education 1 25.00 25.00 0.0%Social Sciences Students Society Society Society Fee 3 15.60 15.60 0.0%

Miscellaneous Fees 2009/10 Appendix BPage 1 of 6

Agenda Item 3f

Page 54: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

McMaster UNIVERSITYMISCELLANEOUS FEES

2009/2010Owner Notes 2008/09 2009/10 % Change

Experiential Education Initiative 3 35.00 35.00 0.0%Midwifery Students Society Fee Society 3 5.00 5.00 0.0%

M.A.P.S. MAPSUndergraduate - All Part-Time Students (per unit) MAPS - Organization Fee 1 5.00 5.00 0.0%Centre for Continuing Education Students (per unit) MAPS - Organization Fee (Correspondence/Internet students 1 5.00 5.00 0.0% pay 1/2 of these fees)

Graduate Students GSA Graduate Students Association 3 terms - Full-Time - GSA Fee 8 46.20 51.40 11.3% 3 terms - Part-Time - GSA Fee 8 27.90 31.05 11.3% 2 terms - Full-Time - GSA Fee 8 46.20 51.40 11.3% 2 terms - Part-Time - GSA Fee 8 27.90 31.05 11.3% Post-Degree (per 1/2 course) 8 9.30 10.35 11.3% 3 terms - Full-Time - Health Insurance Plan 6 163.00 n/a 3 terms - Part-Time - Health Insurance Plan 6 163.00 n/a 2 terms - Full-Time - Health Insurance Plan 6 108.67 n/a 2 terms - Part-Time - Health Insurance Plan 6 108.67 n/a Health Insurance Plan - MBA 6 170.53 n/a Health Insurance Plan - Divinity 6 170.53 n/a H.S.R. Bus Pass Fee 5 142.20 n/a Capital Building Fee 1 30.00 30.00 0.0%

MBA Association (per term) MBA SOC. Full-Time 12 65.00 80.00 23.1% Co-op 12 65.00 80.00 23.1% Allen Gould Trading Floor Fee (per term) 1 15.00 15.00 0.0% Business Employment Services Fee (per semester) 1 265.00 265.00 0.0%

b) Fees Charged By University

Sports Complex Building Fee P Wood MSU - Full-Time (per unit to maximum 30 units) 2 2.65 2.71 2.3% GSA - Full-Time and Part Time- per term 2 10.59 10.83 2.3% Post-Degree (per 1/2 course) 2 10.59 10.83 2.3%

Athletics & Recreation Activity Fee P Wood Undergrads (18 units or more) 2 101.99 104.34 2.3% Undergrads (1 - 17 units) per unit 2 4.53 4.63 2.3% MBA - Full-Time - per term 2 34.00 34.78 2.3% MBA - Part-Time - per term 2 17.00 17.39 2.3% Midwifery 2 101.99 104.34 2.3% Medical Students 2 101.99 104.34 2.3%

Miscellaneous Fees 2009/10 Appendix BPage 2 of 6

Agenda Item 3f

Page 55: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

McMaster UNIVERSITYMISCELLANEOUS FEES

2009/2010Owner Notes 2008/09 2009/10 % Change

Administered By Financial Services T Cooke Administrative Services Fee MAPS/MSU (per unit) 2 1.06 1.08 2.3% Grad Full-Time (per term) 2 6.53 6.68 2.3% Grad Part-Time (per term) 2 3.27 3.35 2.3% Post-Degree (1/2 course) 2 3.27 3.35 2.3%

Student Services Fees P Wood Full-Time Undergraduate Students (per unit to max 30 units) 2 3.98 4.07 2.3% Graduate Students Full-time - per term 2 35.02 35.83 2.3% Part-time - per term 2 17.51 17.91 2.3%

Student Services Fees P Wood Medical Students 2 62.41 63.85 2.3% Post-Degree (per 1/2 course) 2 17.50 17.90 2.3% Non MTCU Funded Programmes Per Unit (to maximum of 30 units - 5 courses) 2 10.14 10.37 2.3% Per Term 2 304.39 311.39 2.3% Off Campus Programs (60% of non MTCU) 2 182.63 186.83 2.3% Medical Radiation Collaborative Fee 2 84.73 86.68 2.3%

Student Health Services J. Fairservice Full-Time Undergraduate , Medical/Midwifery and Divinity Students only 2 52.19 53.39 2.3% Learning Resources Fee S Birnie Nursing - Full-Time 2 140.32 143.55 2.3% Nursing - Part-Time (per unit) 2 7.79 7.97 2.3% Medicine 2 211.79 216.66 2.3% Occupational Therapy 2 149.06 152.49 2.3% Physiotherapy 2 151.07 154.54 2.3% HSC Masters (MSc) Year 1 only 1 10.00 10.00 0.0% HSC Doctorate (PhD) Year 1 only 1 20.00 20.00 0.0% Communicable Disease Screening (includes CLS) 1 25.00 25.00 0.0% Respiratory Mask Fitting (all FHS students, every year) 2 20.00 20.46 2.3%

Coop Fees Faculty of Science Placement Fee (per term) M Benjamin 1 550.00 550.00 0.0% Faculty of Engineering Admin Fee (per year) D Wilkinson 1 100.00 100.00 0.0% B-Tech Coop Fee (per work term) A Heidebrech 1 600.00 600.00 0.0% MBA Co-op Placement Fee (1st 3 terms only) P Bates 1 1,750.00 1750.00 0.0%

2 Fees Charged By University As Incurred (Fees noted in Italic are charged to student accounts and receive academic sanctions)

Administered By Registrar R Levin Applications for Re-admission 1 50.00 50.00 0.0% Applications to Part-Time Studies 1 50.00 50.00 0.0%

Miscellaneous Fees 2009/10 Appendix BPage 3 of 6

Agenda Item 3f

Page 56: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

McMaster UNIVERSITYMISCELLANEOUS FEES

2009/2010Owner Notes 2008/09 2009/10 % Change

Challenge for Credit Equal to Tuition

Examination Re-read (refunded if grade changed) 1 50.00 50.00 0.0% Contribution to Psycho-Educational Assessment 1 200.00 200.00 0.0% Photocopy of Examination Script 1 10.00 10.00 0.0% Replacement of Diploma 1 50.00 50.00 0.0% Replacement Student ID Card 1 30.00 30.00 0.0% Production of Student ID Card at Exams 1 30.00 30.00 0.0% Replacement Student ID Card with Computer Proximity Chip 1 40.00 40.00 0.0% Supervision of Exam for Another University 1 75.00 75.00 0.0% Transcript Fee (students who are covered under the AdminServ Fee and students who pay the Non-MTCU Serv Fee are excluded) 1 10.00 10.00 0.0% Transcript Evaluation (non-refundable) 9 60.00 70.00 16.7% Confirmation Fee - Nursing 1 100.00 100.00 0.0% Rush Transcript Fee (24 hour rush service) 1 15.00 15.00 0.0% Graduation Fee (for those attending) 1 40.00 40.00 0.0% Diploma Delivery Fee (not charged for pick-ups) 1 25.00 25.00 0.0%

Administered By Faculty of Business P.Bates MBA Application Fee 1 150.00 150.00 0.0% MBA Admission Deposit (deposit against fees) 1 1,000.00 1000.00 0.0% MBA E-Commerce Internship Program (per term) 1 400.00 400.00 0.0% MSc E Health Internship (per term/first two only) 1 1,250.00 1250.00 0.0% Commerce Internship Program 1 900.00 900.00 0.0%

Administered By Graduate Studies Office J.Scime Key Deposit for Graduate Students 1 20.00 20.00 0.0% Graduate Application Fee (includes OT/PT) 1 100.00 100.00 0.0% Re-admission Application Fee 1 100.00 100.00 0.0% Course Application Fee 1 100.00 100.00 0.0% Diploma Application Fee 1 100.00 100.00 0.0% Late Documents Fee 1 50.00 50.00 0.0%

Administered By Financial Services T Cooke Deferment Fee 1 35.00 35.00 0.0% Late Payment Fee (January) 1 35.00 35.00 0.0% Late Payment Arrangement Fee 1 50.00 50.00 0.0% Monthly Payment Plan Application Fee 1 35.00 35.00 0.0% Payment Arrangement Default Fee 1 35.00 35.00 0.0% Reinstatement Fee 1 100.00 100.00 0.0% Returned Payment Charge - first occurrence 1 50.00 50.00 0.0% - each subsequent occurrence - additional 1 10.00 10.00 0.0% Interest Charge On Unpaid Accounts - per month 1 1.20% 1.20% 0.0%

Administered By Hospitality Services A Ng Food Card Fine for Misuse 1 25.00 25.00 0.0%

Miscellaneous Fees 2009/10 Appendix BPage 4 of 6

Agenda Item 3f

Page 57: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

McMaster UNIVERSITYMISCELLANEOUS FEES

2009/2010Owner Notes 2008/09 2009/10 % Change

Food Plan Withdrawal Fee 1 50.00 50.00 0.0%

Administered By Bookstore D. Walker Locker Rental - Small 1 20.00 20.00 0.0% Locker Rental - Wide 1 25.00 25.00 0.0% Gown Rental - Off Campus 1 8.00 8.00 0.0%

Administered By Library MR Linkert Overdue Recall Books (per day) 1 2.00 2.00 0.0% Overdue Reserve Material (per hour) 10 2.00 2.00 0.0% Replacement Cost Plus Fine (up to) 1 100.00 100.00 0.0% Returned Book After Billing Effected 1 25.00 25.00 0.0%

Administered By Faculty of Engineering D Wilkinson Work Term Placement Fee 11 275.00 300.00 9.1%

Administered By Faculty of Health Sciences S Birnie M.D. Programme Application Fee 1 75.00 75.00 0.0% Medicine Admission Deposit (deposit against fees) 1 1,000.00 1000.00 0.0% Child Life Studies Programme Application Fee 1 60.00 60.00 0.0% Nursing Program (NON OUAC) Application Fee 1 60.00 60.00 0.0% OT/PT Admission Deposit (deposit against fees) 1 500.00 500.00 0.0%

Administered By Student Services P. Wood Student Code of Conduct Fines - various offences up to $500 1 500.00 500.00 0.0% Missed Appointment Fee (less than 30 minutes) 1 30.00 30.00 0.0% Missed Appointment Fee (more than 30 minutes) 1 50.00 50.00 0.0% Residence Code of Conduct Fines Biohazard Kit C. Miller 1 15.00 15.00 0.0% Noise (first offence) 1 50.00 50.00 0.0% Smoking (first offence) 1 50.00 50.00 0.0% Setting off Fire Alarm/Failure to exit building 1 60.00 60.00 0.0% Loaning/duplicating Residence card or keys 1 50.00 50.00 0.0% Underage consumption of alcohol 1 75.00 75.00 0.0% Tampering with fire safety equipment 1 100.00 100.00 0.0% Alcohol consumed without proper Special Occasion Permit 1 100.00 100.00 0.0% Consuming alcohol and/or intoxication in a public place 1 125.00 125.00 0.0% Possession, use or trafficking illegal substances 1 130.00 130.00 0.0% Failing to complete a non-financial sanction 1 50.00 50.00 0.0% Full Details of fines are available in Residence Code of Conduct

Housing And Food

Housing C Miller

Miscellaneous Fees 2009/10 Appendix BPage 5 of 6

Agenda Item 3f

Page 58: Budget Committee - WordPress.com...Feb 11, 2009  · • B. McCarry reported that the meeting with the Deans to outline the Budget Framework was well received. The Deans appreciated

McMaster UNIVERSITYMISCELLANEOUS FEES

2009/2010Owner Notes 2008/09 2009/10 % Change

Residence (other than Bates and Keyes) - Bunk & Loft 4 3,805.00 n/a Residence (other than Bates and Keyes) - Single 4 5,020.00 n/a Residence (other than Bates and Keyes) - Double/Triple 4 4,550.00 n/a Residence (other than Bates and Keyes) - Quad 4 4,325.00 n/a Residence (other than Bates and Keyes) - Single/Washroom 4 5,330.00 n/a Residence (other than Bates and Keyes) - Double/Washroom 4 4,840.00 n/a Bates (apartment style) 4 5,830.00 n/a Mary Keyes Residence 4 6,110.00 n/a Food Plans A Ng Mandatory Meal Plan 4 2,500.00 n/a Optional Meal Plan 1 4 2,700.00 n/a Optional Meal Plan 2 4 2,900.00 n/a Optional Meal Plan 3 4 3,100.00 n/a Optional Meal Plan 4 4 3,300.00 n/a Mandatory Meal Plan - Bates and Keyes 4 1,850.00 n/a Optional Meal Plan 1 4 2,050.00 n/a Optional Meal Plan 2 4 2,250.00 n/a Optional Meal Plan 3 4 2,450.00 n/a Optional Meal Plan 4 4 2,650.00 n/a

Inter Residence Council IRC President Membership Fee (includes yearbook) 2 42.93 43.92 2.3%

Notes

1 Email/Note received confirming no change2 Email /Note received confirming CPI adjustment based on 2.3%3 No Reply therefore no change4 Residence and Meals Submitted to Budget Committee as part of Housing and Conference Services budget5 H.S.R - will be confirmed March 1st6 Health and Dental Plans - will be confirmed February 1st7 B.Kin Society will collect appropriate fees from Science or Social Science Societies8 Referendum held9 Transcrip Evaluation - Increased costs, fee not changed sice 2004

10 Updated wording from per day to per hour to reflect current practice11 Co-op Fees - Increased costs - still lowest in Ontario12 MBA - wating for refendum results Jan 31, 2009

n/a Information not yet available but is forthcoming

Miscellaneous Fees 2009/10 Appendix BPage 6 of 6

Agenda Item 3f