budget 2012 msr
TRANSCRIPT
MID-SESSION REVIEW BUDGET OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT
FISCAL YEAR 2012
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
BUDGET.GOV
MID-SESSION REVIEWBUDGET OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT
FISCAL YEAR 2012
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENTOFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
WASHINGTON D. C. 20503
THE DIRECTOR
September 1, 2011
The Honorable John A. BoehnerSpeaker of the House of RepresentativesWashington, DC 20510
Dear Mr. Speaker:
Section 1106 of Title 31, United States Code, requests that the President send to the Congress a supplemental update of the Budget that was transmitted to the Congress earlier in the year. This supplemental update of the Budget, commonly known as the Mid-Session Review, contains revised estimates of receipts, outlays, budget authority, and the budget deficit for fiscal years 2011 through 2021.
Sincerely,
Jacob J. Lew Director
Enclosure
Identical Letter Sent to the President of the Senate
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Tables ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� iii
Summary �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1
Economic Assumptions �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������7
Receipts �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������15
Expenditures ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������19
Summary Tables ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������23
Page
iii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1� Changes in Deficits from the February Budget �����������������������������������������������������������������6
Table 2� Economic Assumptions �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������9
Table 3� Comparison of Economic Assumptions ����������������������������������������������������������������������������12
Table 4� Alternative Economic Forecast �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������13
Table 5� Change in Receipts ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������17
Table 6� Change in Outlays �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������22
Table S–1� Budget Totals ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������24
Table S–2� Effect of Budget Proposals on Projected Deficits �������������������������������������������������������������25
Table S–3� Adjusted Baseline by Category �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������26
Table S–4� Proposed Budget by Category �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������28
Table S–5� Proposed Budget by Category as a Percent of GDP ��������������������������������������������������������30
Table S–6� Proposed Budget in Population- and Inflation-Adjusted Dollars �����������������������������������32
Table S–7� Bridge from Budget Enforcement Act Baseline to Adjusted Baseline ����������������������������34
Table S–8� Change in the Adjusted Baseline from Budget to MSR ��������������������������������������������������35
Table S–9� Mandatory and Receipt Proposals from the February Budget ���������������������������������������37
Table S–10� Outlays for Mandatory Programs under Current Law ���������������������������������������������������51
Table S–11� Funding Levels for Appropriated (“Discretionary”) Programs by Category ������������������52
Table S–12� Federal Government Financing and Debt ������������������������������������������������������������������������53
Page
1
SUMMARY
This Mid-Session Review (MSR) updates the Administration’s estimates for outlays, re-ceipts, and the deficit for economic, legislative, and other changes that have occurred since the President’s 2012 Budget was released in February� The 2011 deficit is now projected to be $1�316 trillion, $329 billion or 20 percent lower than the $1�645 trillion deficit projected in February, due to a combination of high-er-than-expected receipts and lower-than-expected outlays� As a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP), the deficit is now projected to equal 8�8 percent, down from 10�9 percent projected in February� The deficits for each of the following 10 years are also project-ed to be lower than previously projected, with a total reduction of $1�45 trillion over the 10-year period� This reduction results primarily from the terms of the Budget Control Act of 2011, which the President signed on August 2� The Budget Control Act lowers future defi-cits by establishing caps on annually appro-priated (“discretionary”) spending each year from 2012 through 2021� It also established a process for achieving further deficit reduc-tion with the creation of a bipartisan, bicam-eral congressional committee (the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction) tasked with recommending spending and revenue propos-als that yield $1�5 trillion in deficit reduction over the 10-year period, about $500 billion in deficit reduction beyond the proposals laid out in the President’s Budget�
As described more fully below, the work of the Joint Committee is critical to achiev-ing fiscal sustainability� What is more, the Committee’s already difficult task will be made even more challenging by the fact that its recommendations will need to take into consideration the current economic climate� On the one hand, due to extraordinary pol-icy efforts, the economy already has made substantial progress recovering ground lost during the financial crisis and subsequent 18-month recession� Between the middle of 2009 and the end of 2010, the economy grew for six consecutive quarters, with real GDP rising at an average annual rate of 3 percent; after shedding 8�8 million jobs over the previ-ous two years, the private sector created 1�3 million new jobs in 2010; the financial system
is no longer in crisis; credit and capital mar-kets have returned to normal levels; and the cost of stabilizing the financial and automo-bile sectors has amounted to a fraction of ini-tial estimates� On the other hand, the reces-sion was deeper than originally reported, and the headwinds the economy has encountered are stronger than anticipated� First, revised estimates showed that the recession includ-ed the worst six-month period of contraction since quarterly data has been collected, fall-ing at an average annualized rate of 7�8 per-cent in the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009�
Second, 2011 has seen drags on the econo-my in the form of a sharp rise in oil prices, the disruption to global supply chains as a result of the earthquake in Japan, a slowdown of growth in Europe, a sluggish rebound in the housing market, and uncertainty surround-ing congressional action on the debt ceiling, all of which have delayed the recovery further� In sum, economic growth and job creation, while positive, have not been strong enough to bring down the unemployment rate to an acceptable level�
That is why, in addition to the actions that were taken at the depth of the financial cri-sis, the Administration has taken significant steps to strengthen the recovery� On December 17, 2010, the President signed into the law the bipartisan Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act, which prevented a tax increase on mid-dle-class Americans, cut payroll taxes for 159 million workers, extended unemployment benefits for 7 million unemployed Americans, and provided a series of tax incentives to busi-nesses to spur growth� These measures have helped buffer the economy against recent headwinds—for example, by providing house-holds with a significant boost to their income that has helped to offset the increase in gaso-line prices� Moreover, in constructing the 2012 Budget, the President laid out a plan for sig-nificant deficit reduction even while ensuring that these efforts did not threaten the recov-ery and maintaining investments in the ele-ments critical to long-term economic growth: clean energy, innovation, education, and in-
2 MID-SESSION REVIEW
frastructure� In the long run, only by living within our means will we be able to make the investments necessary to win the future in a competitive global economy�
THE 2012 BUDGET AND SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENTS
Accordingly, in February, the President’s 2012 Budget provided a significant down pay-ment on the deficit reduction that we need to take, including proposing $1 trillion in deficit reduction over the next 10 years on top of the $2 trillion in projected savings from winding down operations in Afghanistan and Iraq and the expiration of the high-income tax cuts passed in 2001 and 2003� That Budget would have reduced the deficit to 3 percent of GDP by the middle of the decade and sustained that level for many years thereafter� By re-ducing the deficit to this size in relation to the economy, we no longer would be adding to the Government’s debt burden through ad-ditional Federal spending, but would instead be achieving what economists call “primary balance�” At the same time, the 2012 Budget included investments in areas critical to win-ning the future: education, innovation, clean energy, and infrastructure�
Since the 2012 Budget was released, there have been three significant developments that affect both the budget itself and fiscal policy generally� First, on April 15, 2011, the President signed into law the Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011, to provide for ap-propriations for the rest of fiscal year 2011� This legislation cut discretionary spend-ing by roughly $80 billion relative to the President’s 2011 Budget request� In nomi-nal terms, these were the largest one-year cuts in history� Cuts of this magnitude en-tailed not only eliminating wasteful and du-plicative programs, but also making cuts to programs that the Administration supports and would not have made if not for the fis-cal situation� For instance, the new funding levels set in this agreement mean delaying the goal of doubling funding for key research and development (R&D) agencies along with ambitious goals set for the Nation in the President’s Budget in the areas of global health and international development� At the same time, this legislation allowed for continued investments in education, inno-
vation, and critical health programs and did not include many extraneous, ideological provisions that many in Congress desired that would have, for example, damaged im-portant efforts to reform our financial sys-tem and improve the quality and accessibil-ity of affordable health care�
Second, after the 2011 appropriations were finally completed, the President looked again to the future and presented a revised fiscal framework, building on the Budget re-quest, that laid out a comprehensive and bal-anced strategy to cut spending, bring down Government debt, increase confidence in our Nation’s fiscal strength, and support our economic recovery while making the invest-ments we need to win the future� Altogether, the plan would have reduced the deficit by $4 trillion over 12 years� The framework would have saved approximately $770 billion over 12 years in non-security discretionary spend-ing and sought to save $400 billion in security discretionary spending after a comprehensive review of our military’s role, missions, and ca-pabilities� In health care—a key driver of our long-term deficits—the framework identified changes to Medicare and Medicaid that would build on the efficiencies in the Affordable Care Act (ACA), saving $340 billion by 2021 and at least $1 trillion in the subsequent de-cade, while strengthening these programs for future generations� The framework also in-cluded a target of $360 billion in other man-datory savings by 2023� With respect to taxes, the plan called for cutting tax expenditures in order to lower tax rates while still reduc-ing the deficit� The framework also reiterated the President’s position that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for those in the top 2 percent of earners should expire� Finally, the President called for a “debt failsafe” trigger to ensure a decline in Government debt as a share of the economy� Specifically, the President proposed a trigger that would require, by the second half of the decade, our Nation’s debt to be on a declining path as a share of our economy� If that target were not met by 2014, there would be automatic spending cuts (both in direct spending and spending through the tax code) as insurance against inaction�
The President’s fiscal framework set the stage for the third significant development that has occurred since the release of the 2012 Budget, negotiations this summer between
3SUMMARY
the Administration and Congress on deficit reduction and raising the statutory debt limit� Considering that both parties had agreed on the size of the deficit reduction necessary—$4 trillion over the next decade—there was hope that a balanced package of that size, which in-cluded both spending cuts and revenue mea-sures, could be agreed to� In pursuit of this goal, the President called for an agreement on a bold plan that would have included many significant compromises for him and his par-ty� Unfortunately, congressional Republicans would not agree to a package that included revenue increases� Agreement on a smaller package limited to spending cuts was finally reached over the last weekend in July, just be-fore the Government exhausted its options for continuing to finance obligations under the existing debt limit�
The President signed the resulting agree-ment, the Budget Control Act of 2011, into law on August 2� According to the Congressional Budget Office, the provisions of the Act would reduce the deficit by at least $2�1 trillion over the next decade� The first step toward this goal consists of approximately $900 billion in deficit reduction achieved through tight caps on discretionary spending� These caps will bring discretionary spending to its lowest level as a share of the economy since Dwight D� Eisenhower was President� The caps were designed to ensure that spending cuts were balanced between security and non-security programs by setting specific targets for each category during the first two years� Assuming that the reductions continue to be shared across security and non-security programs over the remainder of the 10-year period, the caps would generate $420 billion savings on security programs, an amount that includes a projected $350 billion in defense savings�
The second step toward the $2�1 trillion in deficit reduction is the establishment of the bipartisan, bicameral Joint Select Committee charged with finding $1�5 trillion in addition-al deficit reduction by the end of November 2011� Under the Act, if the Joint Committee is unsuccessful or if Congress fails to pass the Joint Committee’s plan, then a sequester would be triggered that would cut $1�2 tril-lion in spending over 10 years, split evenly between defense and non-defense programs� This trigger is modeled on those devised for the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings legislation in
the 1980s—legislation that created automatic consequences based on congressional action or inaction that led to a period of significant deficit reduction� In addition to the deficit re-duction included in the Budget Control Act, further deficit reduction can be achieved if the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans are allowed to expire at the end of calendar year 2012� The President has con-sistently said that he will refuse to let these tax cuts be extended� Allowing these tax cuts to expire as scheduled and returning the es-tate tax to its 2009 levels will increase rev-enue by $866 billion over the next 10 years� Moreover, by reducing the amount that the Government needs to borrow, this additional revenue will lead to $160 billion in lower in-terest costs, bringing total deficit reduction from this change in the tax code to more than $1 trillion over the next 10 years�
Depending on whether the Joint Committee succeeds or the fallback spending trigger is activated, the Budget Control Act of 2011 will reduce deficits by $2�1 to $2�4 trillion over the coming 10 years� Allowing the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans to expire further increases the total deficit re-duction to $3�1 to $3�4 trillion, equivalent to about 1�5 percent of 10-year GDP�
As shown in this Mid-Session Review, the deficit reduction from the new discretionary caps, the pending recommendations of the Joint Committee, and the expiration of the upper-income tax cuts, combined with wind-ing down operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, will bring deficits down to approximately 2�2 percent of GDP toward the end of the 10-year budget window� These policy changes would be sufficient to put the debt on a declining path as a share of the economy and would therefore place the budget in a fiscally sus-tainable position� The recommendations of the Joint Committee are the key to achieving this, which is why the President will recom-mend an ambitious, comprehensive, and bal-anced deficit reduction plan to Congress in September that would place the country on firm fiscal footing by the middle of this decade�
At the same time, Congress must appreciate that the economy is still wrestling with the after-effects of a very severe recession� Thus, in addition to focusing on long-term deficit reduction, the President will introduce after
4 MID-SESSION REVIEW
Labor Day a package of meaningful, new ini-tiatives to promote economic growth and cre-ate jobs� These will build on the actions the President has been urging Congress to com-plete that will strengthen the economy and create jobs, but also include new measures that will accelerate job growth in the short term� These could include a mix of tax cuts to create jobs and provide economic security to the middle class, innovative infrastructure ideas to put people back to work, and some measures specifically targeted at the long-term unemployed and other specific sectors of the economy that are in particular need�
MID-SESSION UPDATE
The Mid-Session Review updates estimates of Federal receipts, outlays, and the deficit for legislation enacted through August 3, 2011—principally the Budget Control Act of 2011—and for a revised economic forecast, technical re-estimates, and other policy changes that have occurred since the February Budget was released� The economic forecast, like the one in the Congressional Budget Office’s August update, is based on economic data available through late June� In addition, reflecting the substantial data revisions since that date, the Mid-Session Review presents an alternative economic forecast using the latest available data along with estimates of the associated budgetary consequences of this forecast revi-sion� As shown in Table 4, the budgetary ef-fects of the latest economic data are generally similar to the forecast based on data from late June�
Revised Deficit and Debt Outlook
The deficit for 2011 is now expected to be $1�316 trillion, down $329 billion from the deficit of $1�645 trillion deficit estimated in February� As a percentage of GDP, the 2011 deficit is projected to be 8�8 percent of GDP, as compared to 10�9 percent of GDP project-ed in February� This latest projection also represents a slight decline in the deficit as a percent of GDP from 9�0 percent in 2010� A little less than half of the reduction in the estimated 2011 deficit from February is due to higher receipts� The remainder is due to a combination of lower discretionary appropria-tions for 2011 than in the February Budget, as provided in the full-year continuing appro-priations enacted in April, and slower-than-
expected spending across a range of Federal programs, including defense discretionary spending, purchases of GSE preferred stock, and unemployment benefits� The lower pro-jected deficit this year means that the Federal Government’s borrowing needs should be low-er as well�
Relative to the February estimate, defi-cits are also expected to be lower in 2012 and in each subsequent year of the 10-year budget window, amounting to a total reduc-tion of $1�450 trillion over 2012 through 2021� In 2012, deficits are expected to be $145 billion lower as a result of a combi-nation of enacted legislation and policy changes ($91 billion) and economic and technical re-estimates ($54 billion, chiefly from higher receipts)� Over the 10-year horizon, the total of $1�450 trillion deficit reduction from February is more than ac-counted for by the effect of enacted legis-lation and policy changes ($1�490 trillion)� The revised Mid-Session Review economic forecast, discussed in detail in the next sec-tion, increases deficits by $696 billion over the 10-year period while technical revisions to revenue and spending estimates reduce deficits by a nearly offsetting amount� Taken together, the combined effect of the revisions to the economic projections and the technical re-estimation produces a defi-cit increase of $40 billion over the 10-year horizon� Using the alternative economic forecast that reflects data through late August, the economic and technical re-esti-mate would produce a $220 billion increase in the deficit over the next decade�
Federal Government debt held by the pub-lic can be viewed as the sum of all prior defi-cits less prior surpluses and is an important indicator of the extent to which Government activity affects the financial markets� Debt held by the public is projected to be $10�264 trillion at the end of 2011, or 68�6 percent of GDP, lower than the 72�0 percent of GDP projected in February� Some debt held by the public was used to issue direct loans or to purchase financial assets as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)� Debt held by the public excluding these and other financial assets is projected to be $9�194 trillion at the end of 2011, or 61�4 percent of GDP, down from February’s esti-mate of 63�0 percent of GDP�
5SUMMARY
For 2012, debt held by the public is pro-jected to increase to $11�307 trillion, or 72�1 percent of GDP, and to increase further to 73�5 percent of GDP in 2013� After 2013, however, the deficit is projected to decline to levels that result in a declining debt-to-GDP ratio, with debt reaching 70�5 percent of GDP by the end of the 10-year budget window� Debt net of financial assets is also projected to increase in 2012 and 2013, but then to begin declining, reaching 61�3 per-cent of GDP in 2021�
Enacted Legislation
Full-year appropriations� The full-year appropriations act, enacted on April 15, ex-tended continuing appropriations at a level that was roughly $80 billion below the level proposed in the February Budget� The act also made changes to the Pell Grant program and repealed the Free Choice Voucher pro-gram originally enacted under the Affordable Care Act� Relative to the February Budget, the full-year appropriations act reduces the deficit by $51 billion in 2011 and by $49 billion over the subsequent 10 years, 2012 through 2021�
Budget Control Act. The Budget Control Act of 2011, enacted on August 2, authorized increases in the debt ceiling and included a number of provisions that re-duce budget deficits over the next 10 years� Incorporating the caps on discretionary bud-get authority enacted in the Act in the Mid-Session Review reduces spending relative to the February Budget by $740 billion over the next 10 years� Additional provisions in the Act that relate to program integrity ini-tiatives and higher education financial as-sistance bring the reduction in spending to a total of $753 billion� This total does not include the effects of future deficit reduc-tion recommended by the Joint Committee, as discussed below�
Other enacted legislation and debt ser-vice. Other enacted legislation, including the Comprehensive 1099 Taxpayer Protection and Repayment of Exchange Subsidy Overpayments Act of 2011, has a minimal ef-fect on the deficit� Debt service on the effects of enacted legislation brings the total deficit reduction due to enacted legislation to $989 billion over 10 years�
Estimating Changes
New estimates of receipts and outlays due to revisions to the economic forecast and tech-nical revisions reduce the deficit significantly in 2011� These changes reduce the deficit by a smaller amount in 2012 and raise the deficit slightly over the 10-year period as a whole�
In 2011, revisions to the economic projec-tion and technical changes reduce the deficit by $261 billion, largely because of updated information about actual tax collections since February and actual spending trends� Higher receipts account for $141 billion of this im-provement, with lower current-year spending accounting for the remainder� The reduction in spending is split roughly evenly between discretionary programs (largely slower-than-anticipated spending for defense programs) and mandatory programs (including lower payments for GSE preferred stock purchases and lower spending for unemployment and veterans benefits)�
Over the 10-year period, revisions to the eco-nomic projection and technical re-estimates increase the deficit by $40 billion� Receipts are reduced by $46 billion, as lower tax collec-tions due to revisions in the economic forecast, chiefly lower near-term GDP growth and lower projected wage and salary income, are par-tially offset by increases due to technical fac-tors, such as new data available from 2010 tax returns� Increases in outlays due to the new economic forecast, mostly the result of higher cost-of-living adjustments and debt service on all economic changes, are very nearly offset by reductions in outlays due to technical changes� More detail about changes in receipt and out-lay projections can be found in the receipt and spending sections of the Mid-Session Review�
Deficit Reduction Allowance
The Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction established by the Budget Control Act is tasked with developing legislative pro-posals for reducing the deficit, with a tar-get of $1�5 trillion in deficit reduction� The Administration will be recommending a bal-anced array of options for reducing the deficit that encompasses the entire budget includ-ing spending and revenue measures� In light of the ongoing Joint Committee process, the Mid-Session Review includes a deficit reduc-
6 MID-SESSION REVIEW
tion allowance of $1�5 trillion over 10 years� The February Budget included specific man-datory and receipt proposals that reduce the deficit by $1�0 trillion� The deficit allowance in the Mid-Session Review substitutes for the specific mandatory and receipt propos-als detailed in the February Budget, and is not meant to prejudge any specific spend-ing or receipt proposals to be recommended
by the Administration and considered by the Committee� The Administration will release its recommendations for proposals to be con-sidered by the Joint Committee in September� Relative to the policies already proposed in February, the Mid-Session Review’s allowance for Joint Committee deficit reduction reduces the deficit by $501 billion over 10 years, in-cluding debt service�
Table 1. CHANGES IN DEFICITS FROM THE FEBRUARY BUDGET(In billions of dollars)
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2012-2016
2012-2021
February Budget deficit ������������������������������������������ 1,645 1,101 768 645 607 649 627 619 681 735 774Percent of GDP ���������������������������������������������������� 10�9% 7�0% 4�6% 3�6% 3�2% 3�3% 3�0% 2�9% 3�0% 3�1% 3�1%
Enacted legislation:Budget Control Act of 2011 ��������������������������� –* –32 –51 –72 –75 –79 –82 –87 –89 –95 –90 –309 –7532011 full-year appropriations ������������������������ –51 –21 –6 –3 –2 –2 –2 –2 –3 –4 –4 –35 –49Other legislation �������������������������������������������� 1 –1 1 1 1 * * * * * * 2 3Debt service ���������������������������������������������������� –* –* –2 –6 –11 –16 –21 –26 –31 –36 –42 –35 –190
Subtotal, enacted legislation ������������������������������ –50 –54 –58 –80 –88 –97 –105 –115 –123 –135 –135 –376 –989
Economic and technical re-estimates:Receipts ���������������������������������������������������������� –141 –65 –7 11 22 20 17 17 14 10 7 –19 46Discretionary programs ��������������������������������� –58 13 22 9 –1 –5 –6 –8 –6 –6 –6 37 6
Mandatory:Refundable tax credits ������������������������������� 8 6 7 10 14 16 16 15 16 16 17 53 133Unemployment compensation ������������������� –11 –17 –14 –11 –10 –10 –10 –11 –11 –11 –12 –62 –117Social Security ��������������������������������������������� –1 9 11 12 13 13 13 12 11 10 8 59 112Medicaid ����������������������������������������������������� –3 –3 –3 –6 –8 –10 –10 –12 –13 –14 –19 –29 –98Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program �������������������������������������������������� * 5 3 4 7 8 8 8 7 5 7 28 62Foreign Military Sales Trust Fund ������������ –* –1 1 1 * –1 –4 –4 –4 –4 –5 * –20Purchases of GSE preferred stock �������������� –25 ��������� ��������� ��������� ��������� ��������� ��������� ��������� ��������� ��������� ��������� ��������� ���������Veterans benefits ����������������������������������������� –10 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 11 24Civilian and military retirement ��������������� –* 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 21Medicare ������������������������������������������������������ –4 –8 –6 –5 –4 –3 2 3 4 4 8 –25 –4Other ������������������������������������������������������������ –24 10 7 2 3 1 * –* –* –2 * 23 21
Total mandatory �������������������������������������� –70 6 11 12 18 19 19 17 14 8 9 67 134Net interest1 �������������������������������������������������� 10 –5 –23 –29 –13 –11 –8 –9 –12 –13 –16 –81 –140Allowances for costs of future emergencies ������ –2 –3 –1 –* –* –* –* ��������� ��������� ��������� ��������� –6 –6
Subtotal, economic and technical re-estimates � –261 –54 2 3 25 22 21 16 11 –1 –6 –1 40Change due to moving the February Budget
proposals to the deficit reduction allowance2 ����� –19 –37 –63 –95 –23 8 –43 –53 –71 –60 –64 –211 –501Total, changes ���������������������������������������������������������� –329 –145 –120 –171 –86 –66 –126 –152 –183 –195 –205 –588 –1,450Mid-Session Review deficit ������������������������������������� 1,316 956 648 473 521 583 501 467 498 540 568
Percent of GDP ���������������������������������������������������� 8�8% 6�1% 3�9% 2�7% 2�8% 3�0% 2�4% 2�2% 2�2% 2�3% 2�3%
Note: positive figures represent higher outlays or lower receipts�*$500 million or less�1 Includes debt service on all re-estimates�2 Includes debt service�
7
ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS
This Mid-Session Review (MSR) updates the economic forecast that was completed last November and released with the 2012 Budget in early February� The 2012 Budget forecast projected that the economic recovery which be-gan in 2009 would continue and that unemploy-ment would fall gradually from its elevated lev-els� As the economy recovered, the 2012 Budget forecast inflation to remain moderate, and inter-est rates to rise gradually� In general terms, the forecast for the MSR maintains these assump-tions but with modifications to take account of information on changing conditions available at the time of the completion of the MSR forecast, in late June� In addition, to reflect the substan-tial amount of economic turbulence over the past two months, the MSR includes an alterna-tive economic forecast that incorporates the lat-est data through the end of August along with a presentation of its associated budgetary effects�
Real GDP has risen for eight straight quar-ters since economic growth resumed in mid-2009� Revisions to GDP growth published in late July, after the MSR forecast was com-pleted, showed growth slowing sharply in the first half of 2011� The unemployment rate has declined from its peak above 10 per-cent in October 2009 to 9�1 percent in July 2011� Following the resumption of real GDP growth, the economy began adding jobs, and private sector employment has increased in each of the past 17 months� The labor market recovery, however, is occurring only gradu-ally� It will take several years of healthy job growth to offset the nearly 9 million jobs that were lost between January 2008 and February 2010�
Administration policies, as well as the auto-matic fiscal stabilizers such as the unemploy-ment insurance system, contributed to the turnaround in 2009� The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act) was passed soon after the President took office at a time when jobs were declining by 700,000 per month� Recent revisions showed GDP fall-ing at that time at a rate even faster than previously estimated when the President took office, declining at an average annualized rate of 7�8 percent in the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009, the worst six-
month period since quarterly data has been collected� The Administration’s prompt action helped to reverse this precipitous decline, and the turnaround in real GDP growth, and later in jobs, opened the way to an economic recov-ery� Further actions by the Administration and Congress, culminating in the passage of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act in December 2010, have helped sustain demand and foster growth as the Recovery Act has phased out and as the economy has faced fur-ther, unanticipated challenges�
For example, the steep decline in the hous-ing market ended in 2009, but the housing sector has struggled to recover from the re-cession� Almost 3 million homes have been repossessed since 2006, but even so, at the beginning of 2011, there were estimated to be 5 million seriously delinquent mortgage loans, many of which will eventually result in foreclosure� Government programs and the private sector HOPE Now alliance have helped nearly 5 million affected homeown-ers with their mortgages, either by helping negotiate new terms for their loans or by reducing outstanding balances, but the re-maining problems are still significant� Until more loans are resolved, house prices are not likely to recover, and housing investment will probably remain sluggish� Likewise, spreads between private debt, such as commercial pa-per, and Treasury securities have returned to pre-crisis levels, but commercial banks and other private lenders have tightened credit standards and many credit-worthy borrowers continue to have difficulty accessing credit, making it difficult for businesses to expand, entrepreneurs to launch ventures, and fami-lies to borrow to buy a new home or send a child to college� This is a common experience following a financial crisis in which banks and other credit market institutions have suffered severe losses� If past experience is a guide, credit will eventually become more available, but that will take more time�
A second drag on the recovery has been fis-cal consolidation at the State and local govern-ment level� Driven by balanced budget require-ments and decreased tax revenue, this fiscal
8 MID-SESSION REVIEW
tightening has reduced aggregate demand and slowed growth nationally� Over the last 12 months, employment in State and local gov-ernment has declined by 340,000 jobs�
Third, globally, a combination of events has weighed on economic growth� Political uncer-tainty in the Middle East caused world oil markets to tighten, especially for the high-quality crude oil that is most useful in refin-ing gasoline� The price of oil rose by 16 per-cent between September and December 2010 and then rose another 20 percent in March and April of this year, placing a burden on American consumers� Although the U�S� econ-omy is less sensitive to oil price shocks than it was in the 1970s, higher fuel prices still exact a toll, and this was one of the main factors in holding growth below expectations in the first half of 2011� Also, on March 11, a severe earthquake followed by a tsunami seriously damaged the coastal regions of northeastern Japan� These natural disasters have had a worldwide impact because they curtailed pro-duction of parts needed for Japanese automo-biles manufactured both in Japan and abroad� In the United States, for example, production of motor vehicles fell 6�3 percent (0�53 million units at an annual rate) in the second quar-ter, with most of the decline occurring at the American facilities of Japanese automakers�
Moreover, the sovereign debt crisis that be-gan in 2010 in Europe has intensified in re-cent weeks, causing a selloff in global equity markets that threatens to place a new drag on consumer confidence and the global recov-ery� Last year, several European countries en-countered difficulty in obtaining credit, and fi-nancial markets around the world responded negatively to these developments spreading the effects of the crisis to the United States and elsewhere� The European Union acted forcefully to confront these issues when they first emerged, and the affected governments have attempted to restrain their budget defi-cits� Even with these actions, however, the European recovery remains at risk because of increased uncertainty and because the mea-sures taken to address the fiscal crisis have had the effect in some cases of limiting de-mand and hampering recovery� Concerns over sovereign debt returned in recent weeks and spread to larger countries in the European Union, creating volatility in global financial markets�
Although the effects of these events are ex-pected to be temporary in most cases and the Administration remains confident about me-dium-term prospects for growth in the United States, the unexpected slowdown in 2011 led the Administration to reduce projections in its MSR forecast for near-term growth in 2011 and 2012� Meanwhile, new data re-leased since those projections were locked in late June, including significant revisions to previously released GDP data, together with other analysis have led both private and pub-lic forecasters to reduce their projections for growth and employment even further over the past two months� To present a fuller picture, this section also includes an alternative fore-cast in Table 4 below that reflects the latest economic data and outlook� While the effects of the economic turbulence are great on indi-viduals, the cumulative impact on the fiscal condition of the country is relatively minor over the course of the budget window�
Despite recent setbacks, the Administration expects the economy to grow at increasing rates in the months and years to come� One reason for this is that the U�S� economy is operating well below its capacity, with high-er levels of unemployment and more unused resources than at any time in over a quarter century� The potential for a sharp recovery is present in this low level of resource uti-lization� The normal limits to growth are not binding when there is so much unused capacity available� With rapid growth pro-jected in 2013-2017, the unemployment rate is projected to decline and real GDP is pro-jected to return to its potential level� Beyond 2017, the Administration’s forecast is based on the long-run trends expected for real GDP growth, price inflation, and interest rates� Projected real GDP growth in the long run is somewhat below the historical average for the United States because of an expected slow-down in the growth of the labor force as the population ages� Economic growth is expected to average 2�5 percent in the long run, which is unchanged from previous forecasts�
ECONOMIC PROJECTIONS
Given the substantial amount of econom-ic turbulence that the country experienced since the MSR economic projections were finalized in June, this section also includes an alternative projection that takes into ac-
9ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS
count more recent data� These more recent data include both revised historical data for the National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA) released in July, and updated data on current economic conditions and the outlook that were not available in June� Table 2 pres-ents a summary of the original projection in June and, in the Addendum, the adjustments to that original projection related to the NIPA revision� These adjustments generally maintain the same quarterly growth rates for GDP and incomes as the original forecast but start from the revised historical levels in 2011 Q1� In other words, they adjust the MSR forecast for the revisions to histori-cal data, but do not reflect how the outlook might have changed as a result of the revi-sions or other more recent data�
The alternative forecast, shown in Table 4, is an update of the projection based on infor-mation available through late August� Since June, there have been significant changes to the economic outlook, including the annual revision of the NIPA which showed a large downward adjustment in growth in the first quarter, a subsequent downward revision of growth in the second quarter, and other eco-nomic indicators suggesting slower growth than originally projected in the second half� In addition, the Federal Open Market
Committee (FOMC) statement in August suggested that interest rates will remain at their current low level for longer than had previously been anticipated�
Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the Unemployment Rate: Real GDP is expected to rise by 2�8 percent during the four quarters of 2011 (2�4 percent in the adjusted forecast) and to increase 3�2 percent in the four quarters of 2012� The growth rate is projected to rise to 4�0 percent in 2013 and 2014� Beyond 2014, real GDP growth is projected to moderate as the level of real GDP approaches its potential� The growth rate is steady at 2�5 percent per year in 2018-2021�
The unemployment rate is projected to av-erage 8�8 percent in 2011, slightly below its level in July� Unemployment is projected to decline slowly because of the moderate pace of expected real GDP growth and because, as labor market conditions improve, discouraged workers rejoin the labor force, adding tem-porarily to unemployment� With continued growth, the unemployment rate is projected to fall, but it is not projected to fall below 6�0 percent until 2016� These projections reflect the close relationship that has prevailed his-torically between changes in real GDP and unemployment�
Table 2. ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS 1 (Calendar years; dollar amounts in billions)
Actual Projections
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Gross Domestic Product (GDP):
Levels, dollar amounts in billions:Current dollars ��������������������� 14,119 14,660 15,281 16,019 16,889 17,851 18,863 19,893 20,906 21,852 22,807 23,798 24,830Constant (2005) dollars ������� 12,881 13,248 13,586 14,030 14,549 15,131 15,717 16,294 16,820 17,272 17,703 18,146 18,600Price index (2005 = 100) ������ 109�6 110�7 112�5 114�2 116�1 118�0 120�0 122�1 124�3 126�5 128�8 131�1 133�5
Percent change, Q4/Q4:Current dollars ��������������������� 0�6 4�2 4�6 4�8 5�7 5�8 5�6 5�4 4�8 4�4 4�4 4�3 4�3Constant (2005) dollars ������� 0�2 2�8 2�8 3�2 4�0 4�0 3�8 3�6 3�0 2�5 2�5 2�5 2�5Price index (2005 = 100) ������ 0�5 1�3 1�8 1�6 1�6 1�7 1�7 1�8 1�8 1�8 1�8 1�8 1�8
Percent change, year over year:Current dollars ��������������������� –1�7 3�8 4�2 4�8 5�4 5�7 5�7 5�5 5�1 4�5 4�4 4�3 4�3Constant (2005) dollars ������� –2�6 2�9 2�6 3�3 3�7 4�0 3�9 3�7 3�2 2�7 2�5 2�5 2�5Price index (2005 = 100) ������ 0�9 1�0 1�6 1�5 1�7 1�6 1�7 1�7 1�8 1�8 1�8 1�8 1�8
Incomes, billions of current dollars:
10 MID-SESSION REVIEW
Table 2. ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS 1—Continued(Calendar years; dollar amounts in billions)
Actual Projections
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Domestic corporate profits ��� 906 1,241 1,322 1,505 1,575 1,622 1,681 1,723 1,759 1,700 1,647 1,627 1,632Employee compensation ������ 7,812 7,985 8,264 8,625 9,112 9,669 10,270 10,902 11,528 12,127 12,731 13,338 13,935Wages and salaries ��������������� 6,274 6,399 6,624 6,931 7,352 7,804 8,296 8,817 9,348 9,847 10,353 10,848 11,327Other taxable income2 ���������� 3,206 3,264 3,427 3,563 3,753 3,973 4,187 4,423 4,673 4,898 5,108 5,305 5,496
Consumer Price Index (all urban):3
Level (1982–84 = 100) ���������� 214�5 218�1 224�3 228�4 232�8 237�4 242�2 247�2 252�5 257�7 263�2 268�7 274�4Percent change, Q4/Q4 ��������� 1�4 1�2 2�8 1�9 1�9 2�0 2�0 2�1 2�1 2�1 2�1 2�1 2�1Percent change, year/year ���� –0�3 1�6 2�8 1�8 1�9 2�0 2�0 2�1 2�1 2�1 2�1 2�1 2�1
Unemployment rate, civilian, percent:
Fourth quarter level ������������� 10�0 9�6 8�6 8�2 7�4 6�7 6�0 5�5 5�2 5�2 5�2 5�2 5�2Annual average �������������������� 9�3 9�6 8�8 8�3 7�7 6�9 6�3 5�7 5�3 5�2 5�2 5�2 5�2
Federal pay raises, January, percent:
Military4 �������������������������������� 3�9 3�4 1�4 1�6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NACivilian5 �������������������������������� 3�9 2�0 0�0 0�0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Interest rates, percent:91-day Treasury bills6 ���������� 0�2 0�1 0�1 0�5 1�8 3�2 3�8 4�0 4�1 4�1 4�1 4�1 4�110-year Treasury notes �������� 3�3 3�2 3�4 3�8 4�3 4�7 5�0 5�2 5�3 5�3 5�3 5�3 5�3
ADDENDUM:7
Gross Domestic Product (GDP), revised:
Levels, dollar amounts in billions:Current dollars ��������������������� 13,939 14,527 15,128 15,859 16,720 17,672 18,674 19,694 20,697 21,633 22,578 23,559 24,582Constant (2005) dollars ������� 12,703 13,088 13,368 13,804 14,314 14,887 15,464 16,032 16,549 16,993 17,418 17,854 18,300Price index (2005 = 100) ������ 109�7 111�0 113�2 114�9 116�8 118�7 120�7 122�8 125�0 127�3 129�6 131�9 134�3
Percent change, Q4/Q4:Current dollars ��������������������� 0�0 4�7 4�4 4�8 5�7 5�8 5�6 5�4 4�8 4�4 4�4 4�3 4�3Constant (2005) dollars ������� –0�5 3�1 2�4 3�2 4�0 4�0 3�8 3�6 3�0 2�5 2�5 2�5 2�5Price index (2005 = 100) ������ 0�7 1�6 1�9 1�6 1�6 1�7 1�7 1�8 1�8 1�8 1�8 1�8 1�8
Percent change, year over year:Current dollars ��������������������� –2�5 4�2 4�1 4�8 5�4 5�7 5�7 5�5 5�1 4�5 4�4 4�3 4�3Constant (2005) dollars ������� –3�5 3�0 2�1 3�3 3�7 4�0 3�9 3�7 3�2 2�7 2�5 2�5 2�5Price index (2005 = 100) ������ 1�1 1�2 1�9 1�5 1�7 1�6 1�7 1�7 1�8 1�8 1�8 1�8 1�8
Incomes, billions of current dollars, revised:
Domestic corporate profits ��� 1,002 1,418 1,511 1,719 1,800 1,853 1,921 1,969 2,010 1,942 1,882 1,859 1,865Employee compensation ������ 7,806 7,971 8,251 8,611 9,097 9,653 10,253 10,884 11,509 12,107 12,710 13,316 13,913Wages and salaries ��������������� 6,270 6,408 6,634 6,940 7,362 7,815 8,308 8,830 9,361 9,862 10,368 10,863 11,343Other taxable income2 ���������� 2,955 3,108 3,266 3,396 3,573 3,777 3,980 4,201 4,432 4,638 4,828 5,008 5,182
NA = Not Available; Q4/Q4 = fourth quarter over fourth quarter1 Based on information available as of June 2011�2 Rent, interest, dividend, and proprietors' income components of personal income�3 Seasonally adjusted CPI for all urban consumers�4 Percentages apply to basic pay only; percentages to be proposed for years after 2012 have not yet been determined� 5 Overall average increase, including locality pay adjustments� Percentages to be proposed for years after 2012 have not yet been de-
termined�6 Average rate, secondary market (bank discount basis)�7 June assumptions adjusted for July 29, 2011 revisions to the National Income and Product Accounts�
11ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS
Inflation: Consumer price inflation rose in late 2010 and in the earlier part of this year mainly because of a sharp rise in world oil prices� Rising food prices also contributed to the increase� Inflation has moderated since then as oil prices have declined� Core infla-tion, which excludes food and energy prices, also rose, but much less dramatically than the top-line measure� As measured by the CPI, core inflation was 1�8 percent between July 2010 and July 2011; it had been only 0�9 percent over the preceding 12 months� Looking ahead, core inflation is expected to edge up somewhat as the economy recov-ers and unemployment declines� In the long run, the CPI inflation rate is projected to be 2�1 percent per year� The other main mea-sure of inflation is the chained price index for Gross Domestic Product� Year-over-year inflation by this measure is projected at 1�6 percent in 2011 (1�9 percent adjusted), 1�5 percent in 2012, and ultimately 1�8 percent in 2017-2021�
Interest Rates: The projections for interest rates are based on financial market data as of June, including market expectations at that time� Consequently, the forecast does not in-corporate the latest market data, the Federal Reserve’s statement in August that short-term rates would remain at their current low levels through mid-2013, or the dramatic reduction in long-term Treasury rates that occurred in early August as a result of the “flight to qual-ity” caused by the crisis in Europe� The MSR forecast projects the three-month Treasury bill rate to average 0�1 percent in 2011, which is still likely to be true, but to begin rising in 2012 and to reach 4�1 percent by 2017� In light of the Federal Reserve’s statement, the rise in rates in 2012 now seems unlike-ly� Similar caveats hold for the projection of long-term interest rates� The yield on the 10-year Treasury note is projected to average 3�4 percent in 2011 and to rise to 5�3 percent by 2017� Now that long-term yields have fallen well below their June values, the forecast for 2011 appears to be too high� In the later years of the forecast, however, when interest rates are expected to be close to their historical av-erages in real terms given the projected rate of inflation there is no reason to believe the forecast would change based on recent data�
Incomes and Income Shares: Corporate profits have rebounded more quickly than
labor compensation (which consists of wages and salaries and employee fringe benefits)� As a result, corporate profits have risen as a share of the economy over the past 12 quar-ters, while labor compensation as a share of the economy has fallen below its long-run av-erage� As the economy recovers, this situation is expected to reverse� Labor compensation is projected to rise somewhat relative to the size of the economy, while the share of corporate profits is projected to fall� The wage share, excluding fringe benefits, is also expected to recover from its recent low level in step with the increase in compensation�
FORECAST COMPARISONS
A comparison with the most recent Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Blue Chip, and FOMC forecasts is shown below in Table 3� For 2011, the projected rate of real GDP growth is above that of the Blue Chip Consensus (an average of about 50 private-sector forecasts) although when the MSR forecast was determined in June, the differ-ence was smaller� The CBO forecast, which was completed around the same time as the Administration’s projections, is similar for real GDP in 2011� The FOMC forecast, which also dates from June, is slightly higher, mainly because the Administration updated its 2011 forecast for the revisions to the historical data for GDP released in late July by the Bureau of Economic Analysis� Neither the FOMC nor the CBO forecasts were adjusted for these new data, which showed lower growth in the first half of 2011� The consensus forecast has shifted down in the last two months�
In 2012, real GDP growth (fourth quarter over fourth quarter) is expected to be 3�2 percent, which is just below the June FOMC central tendency of 3�3 to 3�7 percent, but it is well above the latest Blue Chip consensus of 2�7 percent, which is the same growth rate that CBO projects for 2012� In 2013, CBO expects a relatively sharp slowdown in the growth rate, because its current-law policy assumptions imply that all of the 2001-2003 tax cuts will expire at the end of 2012� In turn, CBO expects a relatively rapid growth rate in 2014-2015�
Looking further into the future, the Administration expects the economy even-tually to recover much of the ground lost to
12 MID-SESSION REVIEW
the 2008-2009 recession� This will require a phase of relatively rapid growth, which in the current forecast is projected to occur in 2013-2016� The FOMC anticipates a similar catch-up� While CBO also expects a catch-up during this time frame, it is not as much as the Administration or the FOMC is project-
ing� Meanwhile, the Blue Chip consensus ex-pects to make up relatively little of this lost output� This is a major difference in the fore-casts for real GDP� All the forecasters have a similar expectation for the long-run growth rate, which is expected to be around 2-1/2 per-cent per year�
Table 3. COMPARISON OF ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS(Calendar years; dollar amounts in billions)
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Nominal GDP:MSR �������������������������������������������������� 14,527 15,128 15,859 16,720 17,672 18,674 19,694 20,697 21,633 22,578 23,559 24,582Budget ����������������������������������������������� 14,651 15,240 16,032 17,006 18,043 19,052 20,037 20,986 21,910 22,866 23,860 24,896CBO ��������������������������������������������������� 14,660 15,238 15,817 16,301 17,261 18,406 19,333 20,260 21,183 22,140 23,096 24,082Blue Chip ������������������������������������������ 14,527 15,079 15,727 16,560 17,438 18,327 19,225 20,148 21,095 22,087 23,125 24,212
Percent change, fourth quarter over fourth quarter
Real GDP:MSR �������������������������������������������������� 3�1 2�4 3�2 4�0 4�0 3�8 3�6 3�0 2�5 2�5 2�5 2�5Budget ����������������������������������������������� 2�5 3�1 4�0 4�5 4�2 3�6 3�2 2�7 2�5 2�5 2�5 2�5CBO ��������������������������������������������������� 2�8 2�3 2�7 2013-2016 Average: 3�6 2017-2021 Average: 2�4Blue Chip ������������������������������������������ 3�1 1�6 2�7FOMC Central Tendency ����������������� 2�8 2�7–2�9 3�3–3�7 3�5–4�2 Longer Run Average: 2�5–2�8
Percent change, year over yearReal GDP:
MSR �������������������������������������������������� 3�0 2�1 3�3 3�7 4�0 3�9 3�7 3�2 2�7 2�5 2�5 2�5Budget ����������������������������������������������� 2�7 2�7 3�6 4�4 4�3 3�8 3�3 2�9 2�6 2�5 2�5 2�5CBO ��������������������������������������������������� 2�9 2�4 2�6 1�7 4�4 5�0 3�2 2�8 2�5 2�5 2�3 2�3Blue Chip ������������������������������������������ 3�0 1�8 2�5 3�2 3�1 2�9 2�8 2�7 2�6 2�6 2�6 2�6
GDP price index:MSR �������������������������������������������������� 1�2 1�9 1�5 1�7 1�6 1�7 1�7 1�8 1�8 1�8 1�8 1�8Budget ����������������������������������������������� 1�0 1�3 1�5 1�6 1�7 1�7 1�8 1�8 1�8 1�8 1�8 1�8CBO ��������������������������������������������������� 1�0 1�5 1�2 1�4 1�4 1�6 1�8 1�9 2�0 2�0 2�0 2�0Blue Chip ������������������������������������������ 1�2 2�1 1�9 2�0 2�1 2�1 2�1 2�1 2�1 2�1 2�1 2�1
Consumer Price Index (CPI-U):MSR �������������������������������������������������� 1�6 2�8 1�8 1�9 2�0 2�0 2�1 2�1 2�1 2�1 2�1 2�1Budget ����������������������������������������������� 1�6 1�3 1�8 1�9 2�0 2�0 2�1 2�1 2�1 2�1 2�1 2�1CBO ��������������������������������������������������� 1�6 2�9 1�5 1�3 1�3 1�8 2�1 2�3 2�3 2�3 2�3 2�3Blue Chip ������������������������������������������ 1�6 3�0 2�2 2�3 2�4 2�4 2�4 2�4 2�4 2�4 2�4 2�4
Annual average in percent
Unemployment rate:MSR �������������������������������������������������� 9�6 8�8 8�3 7�7 6�9 6�3 5�7 5�3 5�2 5�2 5�2 5�2Budget ����������������������������������������������� 9�6 9�3 8�6 7�5 6�6 5�9 5�5 5�3 5�3 5�3 5�3 5�3CBO ��������������������������������������������������� 9�6 9�4 8�4 7�6 6�8 5�9 5�3 5�3 5�2 5�2 5�2 5�2Blue Chip ������������������������������������������ 9�6 9�0 8�7 7�5 6�8 6�3 6�0 5�8 5�6 5�6 5�6 5�6FOMC Central Tendency 1 ���������������� 9�6 8�6–8�9 7�8–8�2 7�0–7�5 Longer Run Average:5�2–5�6
91-day Treasury bills:MSR �������������������������������������������������� 0�1 0�1 0�5 1�8 3�2 3�8 4�0 4�1 4�1 4�1 4�1 4�1Budget ����������������������������������������������� 0�1 0�2 0�9 2�6 3�7 4�0 4�1 4�1 4�1 4�1 4�1 4�1CBO ��������������������������������������������������� 0�1 0�1 0�1 0�2 0�8 1�9 3�2 4�0 4�0 4�0 4�0 4�0Blue Chip ������������������������������������������ 0�1 0�1 0�5 2�9 3�6 3�8 3�9 4�0 3�9 3�9 3�9 3�9
10-year Treasury notes:MSR �������������������������������������������������� 3�2 3�4 3�8 4�3 4�7 5�0 5�2 5�3 5�3 5�3 5�3 5�3
13ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS
Table 3. COMPARISON OF ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS—Continued(Calendar years; dollar amounts in billions)
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Budget ����������������������������������������������� 3�2 3�0 3�6 4�2 4�6 4�9 5�2 5�3 5�3 5�3 5�3 5�3CBO ��������������������������������������������������� 3�2 3�3 3�2 3�3 3�8 4�3 4�9 5�3 5�3 5�3 5�3 5�3Blue Chip ������������������������������������������ 3�2 3�2 3�6 4�9 5�2 5�4 5�4 5�4 5�4 5�4 5�4 5�4
MSR = Mid-Session Review (forecast date June 2011 adjusted for July 2011 National Income and Product Account revisions)Budget = 2012 Budget (forecast date November 2010)CBO = Congressional Budget Office (forecast date July 2011)FOMC = Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (forecast central tendency, date June 2011)Blue Chip = August 2011 Blue Chip Consensus Forecast extended with March 2011 Blue Chip long-run surveySources: Administration; CBO, The Budget and Economic Outlook: an Update, August 2011 FOMC, Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee, June 21–22, 2011; Blue Chip Economic Indicators, March and August 2011,
Aspen Publishers�1 Fourth quarter levels of unemployment rate�
The Administration projects that unem-ployment will average 8�8 percent in 2011, 8�3 percent in 2012, and 7�7 percent in 2013� CBO expects unemployment to remain high for a longer period� It projects an unemployment rate of 8�9 percent in 2011 and 8�7 percent in 2012-2013� The latest Blue Chip consen-sus is: 9�0 percent in 2011 and 8�7 percent in 2012� The semiannual long-run extension of the Blue Chip forecast was released in March 2011, and the next extension will not be avail-able until October� In March, the Blue Chip had expected a larger decline in the unem-ployment rate, which can be seen in Table 3 in the values shown for 2013 through 2021� The June FOMC projections also show unemploy-ment falling by more than the latest consen-
sus projections� In the long run, all of the fore-casts expect the unemployment rate to reach a level of between 5 and 6 percent�
The forecasts are similar for inflation and interest rates� All of the forecasters shown in Table 3 expect inflation to rise to around 2 percent per year, which is close to the average inflation rate of the past several years� The unusually low level of Federal interest rates that has prevailed since the financial crisis is also expected to end as real interest rates re-turn to near their historical averages but only gradually over the next few years� The recent consensus expects a slower rise in interest rates than was assumed a few months ago�
Table 4. ALTERNATIVE ECONOMIC FORECASTEconomic Assumptions
(Calendar years)
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Nominal GDP:
% Change, 4th/4th:MSR ��������������������������������������������������������� 4�7 4�4 4�8 5�7 5�8 5�6 5�4 4�8 4�4 4�4 4�3 4�3Alternative ���������������������������������������������� 4�7 3�6 4�5 5�5 5�8 6�0 5�8 5�4 4�3 4�3 4�3 4�3
% Change, Year/Year:MSR ��������������������������������������������������������� 4�2 4�1 4�8 5�4 5�7 5�7 5�5 5�1 4�5 4�4 4�3 4�3Alternative ���������������������������������������������� 4�2 3�7 4�1 5�3 5�6 5�9 5�9 5�6 4�7 4�3 4�3 4�3
Real GDP:
% Change, 4th/4th:MSR ��������������������������������������������������������� 3�1 2�4 3�2 4�0 4�0 3�8 3�6 3�0 2�5 2�5 2�5 2�5Alternative ���������������������������������������������� 3�1 1�6 2�9 3�8 4�0 4�2 4�0 3�6 2�5 2�5 2�5 2�5
% Change, Year/Year:MSR ��������������������������������������������������������� 3�0 2�1 3�3 3�7 4�0 3�9 3�7 3�2 2�7 2�5 2�5 2�5Alternative ���������������������������������������������� 3�0 1�7 2�6 3�5 3�9 4�1 4�1 3�7 2�9 2�5 2�5 2�5
14 MID-SESSION REVIEW
Table 4. ALTERNATIVE ECONOMIC FORECAST—ContinuedEconomic Assumptions
(Calendar years)
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Unemployment Rate:MSR ��������������������������������������������������������� 9�6 8�8 8�3 7�7 6�9 6�3 5�7 5�3 5�2 5�2 5�2 5�2Alternative ���������������������������������������������� 9�6 9�1 9�0 8�5 7�8 7�0 6�1 5�5 5�2 5�2 5�2 5�2
Interest Rates:
91-Day Treasury Bills:MSR ��������������������������������������������������������� 0�1 0�1 0�5 1�8 3�2 3�9 4�0 4�1 4�1 4�1 4�1 4�1Alternative ���������������������������������������������� 0�1 0�1 0�1 0�4 2�3 3�8 4�0 4�1 4�1 4�1 4�1 4�1
10-Year Treasury Notes:MSR ��������������������������������������������������������� 3�2 3�4 3�8 4�3 4�7 5�0 5�2 5�3 5�3 5�3 5�3 5�3Alternative ���������������������������������������������� 3�2 3�0 3�3 3�9 4�6 5�0 5�2 5�3 5�3 5�3 5�3 5�3
Budget Effects of Alternative Forecast Relative to MSR(Fiscal years; in billions of dollars)
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2012-2016
2012-2021
Receipt changes ������������������������������������������������ –9 –30 –55 –60 –50 –34 –14 –2 –2 –2 –2 –229 –250Outlay changes:
Unemployment ������������������������������������������� 2 12 17 22 23 19 12 2 * * * 93 108 Net interest (rates) ������������������������������������� 2 –14 –43 –54 –38 –26 –23 –20 –18 –17 –16 –175 –270 All other, including debt service ���������������� * –1 * 4 9 12 14 14 13 13 13 24 91
Total outlay changes ����������������������������� 4 –2 –27 –28 –7 5 2 –4 –5 –3 –3 –58 –71Deficit increase (–) �������������������������������������������� –13 –28 –28 –32 –43 –39 –17 2 3 1 1 –170 –180
* $500 million or less�
15
RECEIPTS
The Mid-Session Review (MSR) estimates of receipts exceed the February Budget es-timates by $141 billion in 2011 and by $46 billion in 2012� In each subsequent year, the MSR estimates of receipts are below the February Budget estimates, resulting in a net decrease in receipts of $882 billion over the 10-year budget horizon (2012 through 2021)� The net increase in 2011 receipts is in large part attributable to the effect of technical re-visions based on new tax reporting data, col-lections to date, and other information as well as to revised economic assumptions� The net increase in 2012 receipts is primarily attrib-utable to technical revisions and revisions in the estimates of expiring provisions extended in the adjusted baseline, which increase re-ceipts by $51 billion and $16 billion, respec-tively� These increases are partially offset by a $19 billion reduction in receipts attributable to moving the February Budget proposals to the MSR’s deficit reduction allowance� The net reduction in receipts of $882 billion over the 10-year budget horizon is primarily due to a receipt loss of $828 billion that results from moving the February Budget proposals to the deficit reduction allowance� The remainder of the decrease is due largely to a receipt loss of $394 billion attributable to revisions in the economic forecast, partially offset by a receipt increase of $283 billion attributable to techni-cal revisions� Over the 10-year budget horizon, enacted legislation and administrative actions reduce receipts by $8 billion and revisions in the estimates of expiring provisions extended in the February adjusted baseline increase re-ceipts by $64 billion�
ENACTED LEGISLATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
Changes that have resulted from enacted legislation and administrative actions reduce receipts from the February Budget by $1 bil-lion in 2011, have a negligible effect in 2012, and reduce receipts by $8 billion over the 10-year budget horizon� The bulk of this reduc-tion in receipts is due to the Comprehensive 1099 Taxpayer Protection and Repayment of Exchange Subsidy Overpayments Act of 2011, which repealed certain information reporting requirements for tax purposes and modified
the limitation on repayment of advance pre-mium assistance credits for coverage under a qualified health plan� Other legislated tax changes and administrative actions included repeal of the Free Choice Voucher program in the Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, and a three-month extension of the due date for filing the Federal highway use tax return�
REVISIONS IN EXPIRING PROVISIONS EXTENDED IN THE ADJUSTED BASELINE
The February adjusted baseline permanent-ly continued the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for middle-income taxpayers; permanently con-tinued estate, gift, and generation-skipping transfer taxes at 2009 parameters; and reflect-ed permanent extension of relief from the AMT� A reduction in the estimated cost of extending these expiring provisions increases receipts by $16 billion in 2012 and $64 billion over 10 years�1 The lower cost of extending these provi-sions is due in large part to reductions in the economic forecast for wages and salaries and revisions to models of receipts, which were re-estimated using current collection experience and updated tax data for prior years�
ECONOMIC CHANGES
Revisions to the economic forecast increase receipts by $19 billion in 2011, reduce receipts by $2 billion in 2012, and reduce receipts in each subsequent year, for a total reduction of $394 billion over the 10 years beginning in 2012 and running through 2021� In 2011, revi-sions to the economic forecast have the great-est effect on individual and corporation income taxes, increasing those sources of receipts by $10 billion and $7 billion, respectively� The in-crease in 2011 individual income tax receipts
1 The adjusted baseline for the Mid-Session Review also includes extensions of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for high-income taxpayers and extension of estate tax relief at current parameters, which are more generous than the parameters in effect in 2009. The Mid-Session Review proposes to allow these provisions to expire, and therefore these provisions do not affect the Mid-Session Review policy receipt levels.
16 MID-SESSION REVIEW
is primarily attributable to increases in the forecasts of wages and salaries and nonwage sources of personal income� Changes in the forecast of GDP and other economic measures that affect the profitability of corporations largely account for the increase in 2011 corpo-ration income tax collections�
Over the 10-year budget horizon, revisions in the economic forecast have the greatest effect on individual income taxes and social insurance and retirement receipts, reducing collections by $283 billion and $173 billion, respectively� Reductions in the economic fore-cast for wages and salaries account for most of the downward revision in individual income tax collections over the period� Wages and salaries and proprietor’s income are the tax base for Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes, the largest component of social insur-ance and retirement receipts� Reductions in Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes, which are the net effect of reductions in the forecast of wages and salaries and increases in the forecast of proprietor’s income, account for most of the 10-year reduction in social in-surance and retirement receipts�
The reductions in individual income taxes and social insurance and retirement receipts are partially offset by increases in customs duties of $28 billion, due to increases in the forecast of imports, and increases in deposits of earnings of the Federal Reserve System of $26 billion, due to changes in the forecast of interest rates� Revisions in the forecast of GDP and other sources of income increase other sources of receipts (corporation income
taxes, excise taxes, and estate and gift taxes) by a net $9 billion�
TECHNICAL CHANGES
Technical revisions in the estimates in-crease receipts by $122 billion in 2011, $51 billion in 2012, and $18 billion to $34 billion in each subsequent year, for an increase of $283 billion over the 10-year budget horizon� The net increase in receipts in each year is primarily due to upward re-estimates of indi-vidual income taxes, which are only partially offset by downward re-estimates of corpora-tion income taxes and social insurance and re-tirement receipts� The technical revisions in both individual and corporation income taxes are in large part attributable to more recent collections data and revisions in the tax mod-els based primarily on updated tax data for prior years� More recent taxable wage data from employer returns accounts for most of the technical revision in social insurance and retirement receipts�
PRESENTATION OF PROPOSALS
Net of legislative proposals that were enact-ed, the February Budget included proposals estimated to reduce receipts by $1 billion in 2011, increase receipts by $19 billion in 2012, and increase receipts in each subsequent year, resulting in a net increase in receipts of $828 billion over the 10-year budget horizon� Shifting these proposals to the Mid-Session Review’s deficit reduction allowance reduces receipts by an equivalent amount over the 10-year budget window but has no effect on the deficit�
17RECEIPTS 17
Table 5. CHANGE IN RECEIPTS(In billions of dollars)
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2012-2016
2012-2021
February Budget estimate .......................... 2,174 2,627 3,003 3,333 3,583 3,819 4,042 4,257 4,473 4,686 4,923Changes due to enacted legislation and
administrative actions ��������������������������������� –1 * –1 –1 –1 –1 –1 –1 –1 –1 –1 –3 –8Changes due to economic and technical
revisions in provisions extended in the adjusted baseline ������������������������������������������ * 16 –1 5 6 7 6 6 6 7 7 32 64
Changes due to revised economic assumptions:Individual income taxes ������������������������������� 10 –13 –26 –39 –37 –34 –29 –27 –28 –26 –25 –149 –283Corporation income taxes ���������������������������� 7 12 8 4 1 –2 –3 –2 –3 –7 –10 24 –1Social insurance and retirement receipts ��� –1 –10 –16 –22 –23 –21 –17 –17 –17 –15 –15 –93 –173Customs duties ��������������������������������������������� 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 14 28Deposit of earnings, Federal Reserve
System ������������������������������������������������������ 2 7 8 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 21 26Other ������������������������������������������������������������� –* * * * * 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 10
Total changes due to revised economic assumptions ��������������������������������������� 19 –2 –23 –50 –54 –52 –44 –41 –42 –42 –44 –181 –394
Changes due to technical re-estimates:Individual income taxes ������������������������������� 123 62 30 35 36 36 35 31 29 29 34 199 356Corporation income taxes ���������������������������� –11 –6 3 –1 –8 –5 –8 –8 –7 –6 –5 –17 –51Social insurance and retirement receipts ��� 9 –3 –* –2 –4 –5 –6 –8 –7 –6 –8 –13 –48Other ������������������������������������������������������������� 1 –3 –1 2 2 –1 * 3 6 8 9 –* 26
Total changes due to technical re-estimates �������������������������������������������� 122 51 31 34 27 26 20 18 22 25 30 168 283
Changes due to moving the February Budget proposals to the deficit reduction allowance ��� 1 –19 –45 –28 –97 –141 –101 –100 –88 –104 –104 –331 –828
Total change in receipts ��������������� 141 46 –39 –40 –119 –162 –119 –117 –103 –115 –112 –315 –882
Mid-Session estimate ................................... 2,314 2,674 2,964 3,292 3,464 3,657 3,923 4,140 4,370 4,571 4,811
* $500 million or less�
19
EXPENDITURES
Outlays for 2011 are now estimated to be $3�630 trillion, $189 billion lower than the February Budget estimate, due largely to reduced appropriations in the Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act as well as slower-than-expected spending in a number of programs, including veterans benefits and the purchas-es of GSE preferred stock� Relative to the February Budget, total outlays have decreased by $59 billion in 2012 and by $832 billion over 10 years� These changes are largely the ef-fect of the caps on future discretionary budget authority enacted in the Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA)�
POLICY CHANGES
Changes due to Enacted Legislation
Legislation enacted since the release of the February Budget has had a sizable, downward impact on outlays in 2011, decreasing spend-ing by $51 billion� Over the subsequent 10 years, 2012 through 2021, enacted legislation reduces outlays by $997 billion� The largest of these changes is the enactment of the BCA�
Budget Control Act of 2011. The BCA, en-acted on August 2, authorized increases in the debt ceiling and included a number of provi-sions that will reduce budget deficits over the next 10 years� Reflecting the caps on discre-tionary budget authority enacted in the BCA in the 2012 MSR reduces spending relative to the February Budget by $740 billion over the next 10 years� Additional provisions in the BCA related to program integrity initiatives and higher education financial assistance fur-ther reduce spending since the Budget over 10 years by $13 billion�
Full-year Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2011. The Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, en-acted in April, provided final appropriations for the Department of Defense and extended the continuing resolution funding non-defense programs to the end of 2011 at reduced levels� Relative to the February Budget, it reduced outlays by $51 billion in the current year, and
is projected to reduce outlays by an additional $49 billion from 2012 to 2021�
Changes in Administration Policy
The BCA also created the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, which is charged with recommending legislation by November 23, 2011 to produce an additional $1�5 trillion in deficit reduction over the next 10 years� As a placeholder for the recom-mendations of the Joint Committee, the MSR includes an allowance for deficit reduction equaling the Joint Committee’s $1�5 trillion target� The Administration maintains its support for the specific mandatory and receipt proposals included in the February Budget, as shown in Summary Table S-9 of the MSR, “Mandatory and Receipt Proposals from the February Budget�” The estimates for the MSR shift the presentation of these propos-als, along with their associated debt service savings, into the Joint Committee allowance to assume compliance with the requirements of the BCA� Removing the February manda-tory proposals and debt service from the MSR outlay totals reduces spending in the MSR relative to the February Budget by $18 billion in 2011 but increases spending by $171 billion over the subsequent 10 years�
The MSR also reflects the Administration’s strengthened commitment to permanent, fis-cally responsible reform to Medicare physician payment rates� It affirms the Administration’s commitment to permanent reform by includ-ing in the adjusted baseline the expected costs of a zero percent update throughout the 10-year budget window, instead of the large cuts under current law�
ESTIMATING CHANGES
Estimating changes are due to factors other than enacted legislation or changes in policy, including changes in economic assumptions, discussed earlier in this Review, and changes in technical factors� Relative to the Budget estimate, economic and technical changes de-crease estimated outlays for 2011 by $120 bil-
20 MID-SESSION REVIEW
lion while reducing outlays by $6 billion from 2012 through 2021�
Discretionary appropriations. Outlays for discretionary appropriations fall by $58 billion in 2011 and increase by $6 billion over the next 10 years relative to the Budget as a result of technical revisions� These chang-es reflect lower outlays in 2011 compared to the February Budget for both security and non-security discretionary programs� The Departments of Defense, Education, Energy, and Homeland Security show significantly lower outlays in 2011 than projected in the Budget due to technical revisions� Over the next 10 years, spending for security programs rises by $51 billion, which is offset by decreas-es in non-security related programs of $45 bil-lion from 2012 through 2021�
Refundable Tax Credits. Changes in technical assumptions increase estimated outlays for refundable tax credits by $8 bil-lion in 2011 and by $133 billion over the 10-year period� Refundable tax credits are paid out as outlays when the amount of the credit exceeds a taxpayer’s income tax liability; the remaining portion of the credits is recorded as reductions in tax receipts� Most of this im-pact is the result of changes to estimates of the premium assistance and earned income tax credits� Technical changes to the models used by Treasury to estimate these programs resulted in more low-income filers being pro-jected to claim these credits�
Unemployment compensation. Changes in economic and technical assumptions de-crease outlays for unemployment benefits by $11 billion in 2011 and $17 billion in 2012� Over the 10-year period of 2012 through 2021, outlays are down by $117 billion relative to the February Budget estimate� The reduction is driven by a lower-than-expected insured unemployment rate as well as a decline in the average weekly unemployment benefit� Additional technical changes arise from a re-specification of the estimating equations used in the Department of Labor’s unemployment model�
Social Security. Estimating changes re-duce outlays for Social Security by $1 billion in 2011 but increase outlays by $112 billion over the next 10 years� Spending increases in both the Old Age and Survivors Insurance
(OASI) and Disability Insurance (DI) pro-grams are largely due to higher cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) starting in 2012 than were assumed in the February Budget� These economic changes are further amplified by in-creases in outlays due to lower projected mor-tality rates for persons ages 65 and older and revised estimates of the effects of the reces-sion on disability incidence�
Medicaid. Projected Federal outlays for Medicaid decrease by $3 billion in 2011 and by $98 billion over 10 years relative to the February Budget estimates� The decrease stems primarily from slower-than-expected growth in benefits paid since February as well as slower projected growth in the mar-ket basket and price indices used to calculate Medicaid benefits relative to the February Budget�
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Outlays for SNAP in-crease by $62 billion over the next 10 years due to economic and technical factors� The economic changes arise from a higher partici-pation rate than was assumed in the Budget, as well as a higher cost of food in the Thrifty Food Plan� Technical changes to the SNAP model as well as a correction for spending of two-year contingency funding that was inad-vertently omitted from the February Budget also contribute to the increases�
Foreign military sales. Technical chang-es decrease spending related to the Foreign Military Sales Trust Fund by $20 billion over the next 10 years� The decrease can be attrib-uted to an overhaul of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency projection model to now include statistical methods that will reduce volatility in future projections in the sales of U�S� defense equipment and services�
Purchases of GSE preferred stock. Lower draws requested by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from Treasury in 2011 under the Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, net of dividends, resulted in $25 billion lower projected outlays than in the February Budget� The gross draws projected in February were $47 billion� Based on these draws, $17 billion of dividends were projected, resulting in net draws of $30 billion� The actual gross draws paid were $21 billion and the actual dividends were $16 billion, re-sulting in actual net draws of $5 billion�
21EXPENDITURES
Veterans benefits. Estimating changes reduce 2011 outlays for veterans compensa-tion and pensions and readjustment benefits by $10 billion relative to the Budget, but in-crease outlays by $24 billion over the next 10 years� Actual experience with Agent Orange payments since February resulted in the low-er outlay estimate for 2011� Part of the re-duction in 2011 was for retroactive payments which are now expected to be paid in 2012� The increases beyond 2011 are also due to higher participation and average tuition costs in veterans education programs as well as higher COLAs leading to higher costs in 2012 and beyond in the veterans compensation and pension program�
Civilian and military retirement. Economic changes comprise the majority of the increase of $21 billion over 10 years in spending relative to the Budget for civilian and military retirement� The COLA of 2�8 percent now projected for 2012, up from the 0�9 percent COLA assumed in February, led to the majority of the increases for both civil-ian and military retirement programs� Small COLA decreases in the period from 2013 to 2016 offset the increase somewhat, but not enough to counteract the 2012 increase and the effect of the increase on all of the ensuing years�
Medicare. Estimating changes reduce out-lays for Medicare by $4 billion in 2011 and by $4 billion over the next 10 years, most notably
in the earlier years of the period� Medicare Part A and D both increase over the next 10 years, with this increase more than offset by reductions in Part B� The main cause of the spending increase in Part A is higher estimat-ed payment updates for providers mainly due to lower estimated labor productivity� Part D spending increases are due to use of more recent data and refined estimates for certain populations� New population projections led to higher enrollment projections in all three programs, which also contributed to the in-creases for Medicare Part A and D� The re-duction in Part B spending is due to a lower estimate relative to the Budget of costs relat-ed to permanently overriding the reduction in Medicare physician payments dictated by the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) formula�
Net interest. Excluding the debt service associated with enacted legislation and policy changes, outlays for net interest are project-ed to increase from February by $10 billion in 2011, but to decrease from February by $140 billion over the subsequent 10 years� The in-crease in 2011 is due primarily to higher out-lays for inflated-indexed Treasury securities, driven by higher-than-expected growth in the Consumer Price Index� The reductions in subsequent years are virtually all due to the effect of lower short- and long-term Treasury interest rates over the next few years of the revised MSR economic forecast, partially off-set by increased debt service due to estimat-ing changes in receipts and outlays�
22 MID-SESSION REVIEW22
Table 6. CHANGE IN OUTLAYS(In billions of dollars)
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2012-2016
2012-2021
February estimate .......................................... 3,819 3,729 3,771 3,977 4,190 4,468 4,669 4,876 5,154 5,422 5,697
Changes due to enacted legislation:Budget Control Act of 2011 ���������������������� –* –32 –51 –72 –75 –79 –82 –87 –89 –95 –90 –309 –7532011 full-year appropriations ������������������� –51 –21 –6 –3 –2 –2 –2 –2 –3 –4 –4 –35 –49Other legislation ��������������������������������������� * –* * –* –* –* –1 –1 –1 –1 –1 –1 –4Debt service ����������������������������������������������� –* –* –2 –6 –11 –16 –21 –26 –31 –36 –42 –35 –190
Subtotal, enacted legislation �������������������������� –51 –53 –59 –81 –89 –97 –106 –116 –124 –136 –136 –379 –997
Changes due to reestimates:
Discretionary appropriations:Security ��������������������������������������������������� –56 4 26 14 2 1 * 1 1 1 1 48 51Non-security �������������������������������������������� –2 9 –4 –6 –3 –6 –6 –8 –7 –6 –7 –11 –45
Refundable tax credits ����������������������������� 8 6 7 10 14 16 16 15 16 16 17 53 133Unemployment compensation ����������������� –11 –17 –14 –11 –10 –10 –10 –11 –11 –11 –12 –62 –117Social Security ������������������������������������������� –1 9 11 12 13 13 13 12 11 10 8 59 112Medicaid ��������������������������������������������������� –3 –3 –3 –6 –8 –10 –10 –12 –13 –14 –19 –29 –98Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program ������������������������������������������������ * 5 3 4 7 8 8 8 7 5 7 28 62Foreign Military Sales Trust Fund ���������� –* –1 1 1 * –1 –4 –4 –4 –4 –5 * –20Purchases of GSE preferred stock ������������ –25 ��������� ��������� ��������� ��������� ��������� ��������� ��������� ��������� ��������� ��������� ��������� ���������Veterans benefits ��������������������������������������� –10 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 11 24Civilian and military retirement ������������� –* 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 21Medicare ���������������������������������������������������� –4 –8 –6 –5 –4 –3 2 3 4 4 8 –25 –4Other programs ���������������������������������������� –26 7 6 2 2 1 –* –* –* –2 * 18 15Net interest1 ��������������������������������������������� 10 –5 –23 –29 –13 –11 –8 –9 –12 –13 –16 –81 –140
Subtotal, reestimates ������������������������������������� –120 11 9 –8 4 2 4 –* –4 –11 –13 18 –6Change due to moving the February
Budget proposals to the deficit reduction allowance 2 ��������������������������������������������������� –18 –17 –27 2 18 18 21 26 33 43 55 –6 171
Total change in outlays �������������������������������������� –189 –59 –78 –87 –67 –77 –81 –91 –95 –104 –94 –367 –832
Mid-Session estimate ..................................... 3,630 3,670 3,693 3,891 4,123 4,391 4,588 4,785 5,060 5,317 5,603
*$500 million or less�1 Includes debt service on all reestimates2 Includes debt service�
23
SUMMARY TABLES
24 MID-SESSION REVIEW24T
able
S–1
. B
UD
GE
T T
OT
AL
S(I
n b
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs a
nd
as a
per
cen
t of
GD
P)
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
Bu
dge
t T
otal
s in
Bil
lion
s of
Dol
lars
:R
ecei
pts
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
2,16
32,
314
2,67
42,
964
3,29
23,
464
3,65
73,
923
4,14
04,
370
4,57
14,
811
16,0
5037
,865
Ou
tlay
s ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
3,45
63,
630
3,67
03,
693
3,89
14,
123
4,39
14,
588
4,78
55,
060
5,31
75,
603
19,7
6745
,120
All
owan
ce f
or J
oin
t C
omm
itte
e de
fici
t
redu
ctio
n t
arge
t ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
������
������
–40
–81
–125
–138
–151
–165
–178
–192
–206
–223
–536
–1,5
00D
efici
t ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�1,
293
1,31
695
664
847
352
158
350
146
749
854
056
83,
181
5,75
5
Deb
t h
eld
by t
he
publ
ic �
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
9,01
910
,264
11,3
0712
,126
12,7
4913
,411
14,1
2114
,726
15,2
8815
,869
16,4
8917
,137
Deb
t n
et o
f fi
nan
cial
ass
ets
�����
������
������
������
������
�����
7,89
49,
194
10,1
3010
,769
11,2
4211
,762
12,3
4512
,845
13,3
1213
,810
14,3
5014
,918
Gro
ss d
omes
tic
prod
uct
(G
DP
) ��
������
������
������
������
������
� 1
4,36
0 1
4,96
6 1
5,67
3 1
6,49
0 1
7,42
6 1
8,42
3 1
9,43
5 2
0,45
3 2
1,40
4 2
2,33
9 2
3,31
0 2
4,32
2
Bu
dge
t T
otal
s as
a P
erce
nt
of G
DP
:R
ecei
pts
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
15�1
%15
�5%
17�1
%18
�0%
18�9
%18
�8%
18�8
%19
�2%
19�3
%19
�6%
19�6
%19
�8%
18�3
%18
�9%
Ou
tlay
s ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
24�1
%24
�3%
23�4
%22
�4%
22�3
%22
�4%
22�6
%22
�4%
22�4
%22
�7%
22�8
%23
�0%
22�6
%22
�6%
All
owan
ce f
or J
oin
t C
omm
itte
e de
fici
t re
duct
ion
ta
rget
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
������
���–0
�3%
–0�5
%–0
�7%
–0�8
%–0
�8%
–0�8
%–0
�8%
–0�9
%–0
�9%
–0�9
%–0
�6%
–0�7
%D
efici
t ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�9�
0%8�
8%6�
1%3�
9%2�
7%2�
8%3�
0%2�
4%2�
2%2�
2%2�
3%2�
3%3�
7%3�
0%
Deb
t h
eld
by t
he
publ
ic �
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
62�8
%68
�6%
72�1
%73
�5%
73�2
%72
�8%
72�7
%72
�0%
71�4
%71
�0%
70�7
%70
�5%
Deb
t n
et o
f fi
nan
cial
ass
ets
�����
������
������
������
������
�����
55�0
%61
�4%
64�6
%65
�3%
64�5
%63
�8%
63�5
%62
�8%
62�2
%61
�8%
61�6
%61
�3%
25SUMMARY TABLES 25T
able
S–2
. E
FF
EC
T O
F B
UD
GE
T P
RO
PO
SA
LS
ON
PR
OJ
EC
TE
D D
EF
ICIT
S(D
efici
t in
crea
ses
(+)
or d
ecre
ases
(–)
in b
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
Pro
ject
ed d
efici
ts i
n t
he
adju
sted
bas
elin
e 1 ..
......
...1,
316
1,03
385
577
286
897
292
893
099
81,
079
1,15
14,
500
9,58
6P
erce
nt
of G
DP
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���8�
8%6�
6%5�
2%4�
4%4�
7%5�
0%4�
5%4�
3%4�
5%4�
6%4�
7%5�
2%4�
9%
Defi
cit
red
uct
ion
pro
pos
als:
Joi
nt
Com
mit
tee
defi
cit
red
uct
ion
tar
get:
Pro
gram
mat
ic c
han
ges
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
–40
–80
–120
–126
–132
–138
–144
–150
–155
–163
–498
–1,2
47D
ebt
serv
ice
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
–*–1
–5–1
2–1
9–2
7–3
4–4
2–5
1–6
0–3
8–2
53To
tal,
Join
t C
omm
itte
e de
ficit
red
ucti
on t
arge
t ���
�����
������
–40
–81
–125
–138
–151
–165
–178
–192
–206
–223
–536
–1,5
00
Ove
rsea
s co
nti
nge
ncy
op
erat
ion
s (O
CO
):R
edu
ctio
ns
in O
CO
fu
ndi
ng
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–2
4–7
8–1
03–1
15–1
20–1
23–1
26–1
29–1
32–1
35–4
39–1
,084
Deb
t se
rvic
e ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
���–*
–1–5
–11
–17
–24
–30
–37
–45
–53
–33
–221
Tot
al, o
vers
eas
con
tin
gen
cy o
pera
tion
s ���
������
������
������
���–2
4–7
9–1
08–1
26–1
36–1
46–1
56–1
66–1
77–1
88–4
72–1
,305
Exp
irat
ion
of
hig
h-i
nco
me
tax
cuts
: R
esto
re h
igh
-in
com
e ta
x ra
tes
to c
urr
ent
law
����
������
������
–13
–47
–54
–67
–79
–88
–94
–100
–106
–112
–260
–760
Ret
urn
est
ate
tax
reli
ef t
o 20
09 p
aram
eter
s ��
������
�–*
–*–*
–9–1
0–1
1–1
3–1
4–1
5–1
6–1
8–3
1–1
06D
ebt
serv
ice
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��–*
–*–1
–3–7
–11
–16
–21
–27
–34
–41
–21
–160
Tot
al, e
xpir
atio
n o
f h
igh
-in
com
e ta
x cu
ts �
������
����
–*–1
3–4
7–6
6–8
4–1
01–1
17–1
29–1
42–1
56–1
71–3
11–1
,026
Tot
al d
efici
t re
du
ctio
n
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
–*–7
6–2
07–2
99–3
47–3
89–4
28–4
63–5
00–5
39–5
82–1
,319
–3,8
31
Res
ult
ing
defi
cits
in
201
2 M
id-S
essi
on R
evie
w .
....
1,31
695
664
847
352
158
350
146
749
854
056
83,
181
5,75
5P
erce
nt
of G
DP
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���8�
8%6�
1%3�
9%2�
7%2�
8%3�
0%2�
4%2�
2%2�
2%2�
3%2�
3%3�
7%3�
0%
Mem
oran
du
m:
Res
ult
ing
defi
cit
leve
ls if
hig
h-i
nco
me
tax
cuts
are
n
ot a
llow
ed t
o ex
pire
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��1,
316
969
695
539
604
684
617
596
640
696
740
3,49
26,
781
Per
cen
t of
GD
P �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�8�
8%6�
2%4�
2%3�
1%3�
3%3�
5%3�
0%2�
8%2�
9%3�
0%3�
0%4�
1%3�
5%
* $5
00 m
illi
on o
r le
ss�
1 S
ee T
able
s S
-3 a
nd
S-7
for
info
rmat
ion
on
th
e ad
just
ed b
asel
ine�
26 MID-SESSION REVIEW26T
able
S–3
. A
DJ
US
TE
D B
AS
EL
INE
BY
CA
TE
GO
RY
1
(In
bil
lion
s of
dol
lars
)
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
Ou
tlay
s:
App
ropr
iate
d (“
disc
reti
onar
y”)
prog
ram
s: 2
Sec
uri
ty ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�81
683
588
388
387
487
588
790
392
294
296
298
24,
402
9,11
4N
on-s
ecu
rity
���
������
������
������
������
������
������
���49
047
744
039
438
438
738
939
440
141
041
942
71,
993
4,04
4S
ubt
otal
, app
ropr
iate
d pr
ogra
ms
�����
��1,
306
1,31
21,
324
1,27
71,
258
1,26
21,
276
1,29
71,
323
1,35
21,
381
1,41
06,
396
13,1
58
Man
dato
ry p
rogr
ams:
Soc
ial S
ecu
rity
�����
������
������
������
������
������
�����
701
726
768
813
858
907
959
1,01
51,
074
1,13
81,
206
1,27
84,
305
10,0
15M
edic
are
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��44
648
447
852
455
458
063
165
467
873
879
485
22,
766
6,48
2M
edic
aid
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��27
327
326
628
534
838
642
145
148
051
454
758
61,
705
4,28
4T
roub
led
Ass
et R
elie
f Pro
gram
(TA
RP
) 3 ���
–110
–38
1712
65
21
**
*���
������
4243
Oth
er m
anda
tory
pro
gram
s ���
������
������
����
644
657
602
559
579
616
668
671
674
713
737
779
3,02
46,
598
Su
btot
al, m
anda
tory
pro
gram
s ��
������
��1,
954
2,10
22,
132
2,19
22,
344
2,49
32,
681
2,79
12,
907
3,10
33,
284
3,49
511
,843
27,4
22N
et in
tere
st �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
196
216
235
297
391
491
572
653
722
789
853
917
1,98
65,
920
Adj
ust
men
ts t
o re
flec
t po
ssib
le
emer
gen
cies
4 ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
���1
37
89
910
1010
1010
3686
Tot
al o
utl
ays
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
��3,
456
3,63
03,
694
3,77
34,
001
4,25
54,
538
4,75
04,
963
5,25
35,
528
5,83
120
,260
46,5
85
Rec
eip
ts:
Indi
vidu
al in
com
e ta
xes
������
������
������
������
������
899
1,08
91,
196
1,29
41,
437
1,56
61,
694
1,82
21,
945
2,06
42,
185
2,30
77,
187
17,5
11C
orpo
rati
on in
com
e ta
xes
�����
������
������
������
����
191
194
333
408
481
429
396
451
455
467
466
487
2,04
54,
372
Soc
ial i
nsu
ran
ce a
nd
reti
rem
ent
rece
ipts
:S
ocia
l Sec
uri
ty p
ayro
ll t
axes
���
������
������
�63
256
465
172
176
280
486
190
895
81,
007
1,05
11,
104
3,80
08,
827
Med
icar
e pa
yrol
l tax
es �
������
������
������
������
�18
018
820
021
523
224
626
427
929
430
932
334
01,
156
2,70
0U
nem
ploy
men
t in
sura
nce
����
������
������
�����
4555
5559
6264
6561
5961
6061
305
608
Oth
er r
etir
emen
t ��
������
������
������
������
������
����
88
88
89
99
99
1010
4389
Exc
ise
taxe
s ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
6770
7987
9710
210
410
811
512
813
414
046
91,
094
Est
ate
and
gift
tax
es �
������
������
������
������
������
����
197
1213
1516
1718
1921
2223
7317
6C
ust
oms
duti
es ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
2530
3437
3942
4346
4851
5355
195
448
Dep
osit
s of
ear
nin
gs, F
eder
al R
eser
ve
Sys
tem
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�76
8673
5544
4039
4347
5053
5425
249
9O
ther
mis
cell
aneo
us
rece
ipts
����
������
������
�����
2122
1919
5269
7478
8287
9399
235
674
Tot
al r
ecei
pts
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
�2,
163
2,31
42,
661
2,91
83,
229
3,38
73,
566
3,82
24,
032
4,25
54,
449
4,68
115
,760
36,9
99
Defi
cit
.....
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
..1,
293
1,31
61,
033
855
772
868
972
928
930
998
1,07
91,
151
4,50
09,
586
Net
inte
rest
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���19
621
623
529
739
149
157
265
372
278
985
391
71,
986
5,92
0P
rim
ary
defi
cit
.....
......
......
......
......
......
......
1,09
71,
100
798
557
381
378
400
275
208
209
225
234
2,51
43,
666
On
-bu
dget
defi
cit
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
1,37
01,
377
1,09
891
883
693
21,
050
1,00
81,
012
1,07
61,
144
1,20
84,
834
10,2
82O
ff-b
udg
et s
urp
lus
(–)
�����
������
������
������
������
����
–77
–62
–65
–63
–63
–64
–78
–79
–82
–78
–65
–57
–334
–695
27SUMMARY TABLES 27T
able
S–3
. A
DJ
US
TE
D B
AS
EL
INE
BY
CA
TE
GO
RY
—C
onti
nu
ed(I
n b
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs)
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
Mem
oran
du
m, b
ud
get
auth
orit
y fo
r ap
pro
pri
ated
pro
gram
s: 2
Sec
uri
ty ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
857
847
845
850
865
881
897
917
936
956
976
997
4,33
89,
119
Non
-sec
uri
ty
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
401
370
360
362
369
377
384
392
401
410
419
428
1,85
23,
901
Tot
al, a
ppro
pria
ted
fun
din
g ���
������
������
����
1,25
81,
218
1,20
51,
212
1,23
41,
257
1,28
11,
308
1,33
71,
366
1,39
51,
425
6,19
013
,021
* $5
00 m
illi
on o
r le
ss�
1 S
ee T
able
S–7
for
info
rmat
ion
on
adj
ust
men
ts t
o th
e B
udg
et E
nfo
rcem
ent
Act
(B
EA
) ba
seli
ne�
2 D
iscr
etio
nar
y sp
endi
ng
leve
ls o
ther
th
an o
vers
eas
con
tin
gen
cy o
pera
tion
s re
flec
t th
e bu
dget
au
thor
ity
caps
un
der
the
Bu
dget
Con
trol
Act
of 2
011�
Th
e sp
lit
of d
iscr
e-ti
onar
y sp
endi
ng
betw
een
sec
uri
ty a
nd
non
-sec
uri
ty a
fter
201
3 is
bas
ed o
n in
crea
sin
g bu
dget
au
thor
ity
in e
ach
cat
egor
y by
th
e gr
owth
rat
e in
th
e ag
greg
ate
disc
reti
onar
y ca
p� 3 O
utl
ays
for
TA
RP
in 2
011
and
subs
equ
ent
year
s re
sult
fro
m o
blig
atio
ns
incu
rred
th
rou
gh O
ctob
er 3
, 201
0 fo
r th
e H
ome
Aff
orda
ble
Mod
ifica
tion
Pro
gram
an
d ot
her
T
AR
P p
rogr
ams�
4 T
hes
e am
oun
ts r
epre
sen
t a
plac
ehol
der
for
maj
or d
isas
ters
req
uir
ing
Fed
eral
ass
ista
nce
for
reli
ef a
nd
reco
nst
ruct
ion
� S
uch
ass
ista
nce
mig
ht
be p
rovi
ded
in t
he
form
of
dis
cret
ion
ary
or m
anda
tory
ou
tlay
s or
tax
rel
ief�
Th
ese
amou
nts
are
incl
ude
d as
ou
tlay
s fo
r co
nve
nie
nce
�
28 MID-SESSION REVIEW28T
able
S–4
. P
RO
PO
SE
D B
UD
GE
T B
Y C
AT
EG
OR
Y(I
n b
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs)
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
Ou
tlay
s:
App
ropr
iate
d (“
disc
reti
onar
y”) p
rogr
ams:
1
Sec
uri
ty ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
816
835
860
805
771
761
768
781
797
813
830
847
3,96
48,
031
Non
-sec
uri
ty
������
������
������
������
������
������
���49
047
744
039
438
438
738
839
340
141
041
942
71,
993
4,04
3S
ubt
otal
, app
ropr
iate
d pr
ogra
ms
����
1,30
61,
312
1,30
01,
199
1,15
51,
147
1,15
61,
174
1,19
81,
223
1,24
81,
274
5,95
712
,074
Man
dato
ry p
rogr
ams:
Soc
ial S
ecu
rity
�����
������
������
������
������
������
��70
172
676
881
385
890
795
91,
015
1,07
41,
138
1,20
61,
278
4,30
510
,015
Med
icar
e ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��44
648
447
852
455
458
063
165
467
873
879
485
22,
766
6,48
2M
edic
aid
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
273
273
266
285
348
386
421
451
480
514
547
586
1,70
54,
284
Tro
ubl
ed A
sset
Rel
ief
Pro
gram
(T
AR
P) 2
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�–1
10–3
817
126
52
1*
**
������
���42
43O
ther
man
dato
ry p
rogr
ams
������
������
����
644
657
602
559
579
616
668
671
674
713
737
779
3,02
46,
598
Su
btot
al, m
anda
tory
pro
gram
s ��
�����
1,95
42,
102
2,13
22,
192
2,34
42,
493
2,68
12,
791
2,90
73,
103
3,28
43,
495
11,8
4327
,422
Net
inte
rest
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
196
216
235
296
384
473
545
613
671
724
775
824
1,93
25,
539
Adj
ust
men
ts t
o re
flec
t po
ssib
le
emer
gen
cies
3 ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
13
78
99
1010
1010
1036
86T
otal
ou
tlay
s ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
��3,
456
3,63
03,
670
3,69
33,
891
4,12
34,
391
4,58
84,
785
5,06
05,
317
5,60
319
,767
45,1
20
Rec
eip
ts:
Indi
vidu
al in
com
e ta
xes
������
������
������
������
���89
91,
089
1,20
91,
341
1,49
11,
633
1,77
31,
910
2,03
92,
164
2,29
12,
420
7,44
718
,271
Cor
pora
tion
inco
me
taxe
s ��
������
������
������
����
191
194
333
408
481
429
396
451
455
467
466
487
2,04
54,
372
Soc
ial i
nsu
ran
ce a
nd
reti
rem
ent
rece
ipts
:S
ocia
l Sec
uri
ty p
ayro
ll t
axes
���
������
����
632
564
651
721
762
804
861
908
958
1,00
71,
051
1,10
43,
800
8,82
7M
edic
are
payr
oll t
axes
����
������
������
������
�18
018
820
021
523
224
626
427
929
430
932
334
01,
156
2,70
0U
nem
ploy
men
t in
sura
nce
����
������
������
��45
5555
5962
6465
6159
6160
6130
560
8O
ther
ret
irem
ent
�����
������
������
������
������
����
88
88
89
99
99
1010
4389
Exc
ise
taxe
s ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��67
7079
8797
102
104
108
115
128
134
140
469
1,09
4E
stat
e an
d gi
ft t
axes
����
������
������
������
������
����
197
1213
2426
2831
3336
3841
104
282
Cu
stom
s du
ties
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
2530
3437
3942
4346
4851
5355
195
448
Dep
osit
s of
ear
nin
gs, F
eder
al R
eser
ve
Sys
tem
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
7686
7355
4440
3943
4750
5354
252
499
Oth
er m
isce
llan
eou
s re
ceip
ts �
������
������
�����
2122
1919
5269
7478
8287
9399
235
674
Tot
al r
ecei
pts
�����
������
������
������
������
������
����
2,16
32,
314
2,67
42,
964
3,29
23,
464
3,65
73,
923
4,14
04,
370
4,57
14,
811
16,0
5037
,865
All
owan
ce f
or J
oin
t C
omm
itte
e d
efici
t re
du
ctio
n t
arge
t 4 ..
......
......
......
......
......
..���
������
������
���–4
0–8
1–1
25–1
38–1
51–1
65–1
78–1
92–2
06–2
23–5
36–1
,500
Defi
cit
.....
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
.....
1,29
31,
316
956
648
473
521
583
501
467
498
540
568
3,18
15,
755
Net
inte
rest
4 ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
196
216
234
295
378
461
525
587
636
682
724
763
1,89
35,
286
Pri
mar
y d
efici
t/su
rplu
s (–
) ..
......
......
...1,
097
1,10
072
235
395
6058
–86
–169
–184
–184
–195
1,28
746
9
29SUMMARY TABLES 29T
able
S–4
. P
RO
PO
SE
D B
UD
GE
T B
Y C
AT
EG
OR
Y—
Con
tin
ued
(In
bil
lion
s of
dol
lars
)
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
On
-bu
dget
defi
cit
������
������
������
������
������
������
��1,
370
1,37
71,
020
710
536
585
661
580
549
576
606
625
3,51
36,
449
Off
-bu
dget
su
rplu
s (–
) ��
������
������
������
������
����
–77
–62
–64
–63
–63
–64
–78
–79
–82
–78
–66
–57
–332
–694
Mem
oran
du
m, b
ud
get
auth
orit
y fo
r ap
pro
pri
ated
pro
gram
s: 1
Sec
uri
ty ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���85
784
781
173
674
876
177
579
180
782
484
185
83,
831
7,95
2N
on-s
ecu
rity
���
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
401
370
360
362
369
376
384
392
401
410
419
428
1,85
13,
900
Tot
al, a
ppro
pria
ted
fun
din
g ���
������
������
�1,
258
1,21
81,
170
1,09
81,
117
1,13
71,
159
1,18
31,
208
1,23
41,
260
1,28
65,
682
11,8
52
* $5
00 m
illi
on o
r le
ss�
1 D
iscr
etio
nar
y sp
endi
ng
leve
ls o
ther
th
an o
vers
eas
con
tin
gen
cy o
pera
tion
s re
flec
t th
e bu
dget
au
thor
ity
caps
un
der
the
Bu
dget
Con
trol
Act
of 2
011�
Th
e sp
lit
of d
iscr
e-ti
onar
y sp
endi
ng
betw
een
sec
uri
ty a
nd
non
-sec
uri
ty a
fter
201
3 is
bas
ed o
n in
crea
sin
g bu
dget
au
thor
ity
in e
ach
cat
egor
y by
th
e gr
owth
rat
e in
th
e ag
greg
ate
disc
reti
onar
y ca
p� 2 O
utl
ays
for
TA
RP
in 2
011
and
subs
equ
ent
year
s re
sult
fro
m o
blig
atio
ns
incu
rred
th
rou
gh O
ctob
er 3
, 201
0 fo
r th
e H
ome
Aff
orda
ble
Mod
ifica
tion
Pro
gram
an
d ot
her
T
AR
P p
rogr
ams�
3 T
hes
e am
oun
ts r
epre
sen
t a
plac
ehol
der
for
maj
or d
isas
ters
req
uir
ing
Fed
eral
ass
ista
nce
for
reli
ef a
nd
reco
nst
ruct
ion
� S
uch
ass
ista
nce
mig
ht
be p
rovi
ded
in t
he
form
of
dis
cret
ion
ary
or m
anda
tory
ou
tlay
s or
tax
rel
ief�
Th
ese
amou
nts
are
incl
ude
d as
ou
tlay
s fo
r co
nve
nie
nce
�4 In
clu
des
debt
ser
vice
on
Joi
nt
Com
mit
tee
prop
osal
s�
30 MID-SESSION REVIEW30T
able
S–5
. P
RO
PO
SE
D B
UD
GE
T B
Y C
AT
EG
OR
Y A
S A
PE
RC
EN
T O
F G
DP
(As
a pe
rcen
t of
GD
P)
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Ave
rage
s20
12–
2016
2012
–20
21
Ou
tlay
s:
App
ropr
iate
d (“
disc
reti
onar
y”)
prog
ram
s: 1
Sec
uri
ty ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��5�
75�
65�
54�
94�
44�
14�
03�
83�
73�
63�
63�
54�
64�
1N
on-s
ecu
rity
���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
3�4
3�2
2�8
2�4
2�2
2�1
2�0
1�9
1�9
1�8
1�8
1�8
2�3
2�1
Su
btot
al, a
ppro
pria
ted
prog
ram
s ��
������
������
������
9�1
8�8
8�3
7�3
6�6
6�2
5�9
5�7
5�6
5�5
5�4
5�2
6�9
6�2
Man
dato
ry p
rogr
ams:
Soc
ial S
ecu
rity
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
4�9
4�8
4�9
4�9
4�9
4�9
4�9
5�0
5�0
5�1
5�2
5�3
4�9
5�0
Med
icar
e ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
3�1
3�2
3�1
3�2
3�2
3�1
3�2
3�2
3�2
3�3
3�4
3�5
3�2
3�2
Med
icai
d ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
1�9
1�8
1�7
1�7
2�0
2�1
2�2
2�2
2�2
2�3
2�3
2�4
1�9
2�1
Tro
ubl
ed A
sset
Rel
ief
Pro
gram
(T
AR
P) 2
������
�����
–0�8
–0�3
0�1
0�1
**
**
**
*���
������
0�1
*O
ther
man
dato
ry p
rogr
ams
������
������
������
������
������
��4�
54�
43�
83�
43�
33�
33�
43�
33�
13�
23�
23�
23�
53�
3S
ubt
otal
, man
dato
ry p
rogr
ams
�����
������
������
������
13�6
14�0
13�6
13�3
13�5
13�5
13�8
13�6
13�6
13�9
14�1
14�4
13�5
13�7
Net
inte
rest
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
1�4
1�4
1�5
1�8
2�2
2�6
2�8
3�0
3�1
3�2
3�3
3�4
2�2
2�7
Adj
ust
men
ts t
o re
flec
t po
ssib
le e
mer
gen
cies
3 ���
�����
������
���*
**
**
**
**
**
**
Tot
al o
utl
ays
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���24
�124
�323
�422
�422
�322
�422
�622
�422
�422
�722
�823
�022
�622
�6
Rec
eip
ts:
Indi
vidu
al in
com
e ta
xes
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�6�
37�
37�
78�
18�
68�
99�
19�
39�
59�
79�
89�
98�
59�
1C
orpo
rati
on in
com
e ta
xes
�����
������
������
������
������
������
�����
1�3
1�3
2�1
2�5
2�8
2�3
2�0
2�2
2�1
2�1
2�0
2�0
2�3
2�2
Soc
ial i
nsu
ran
ce a
nd
reti
rem
ent
rece
ipts
:S
ocia
l Sec
uri
ty p
ayro
ll t
axes
���
������
������
������
������
��4�
43�
84�
24�
44�
44�
44�
44�
44�
54�
54�
54�
54�
34�
4M
edic
are
payr
oll t
axes
����
������
������
������
������
������
�����
1�3
1�3
1�3
1�3
1�3
1�3
1�4
1�4
1�4
1�4
1�4
1�4
1�3
1�3
Un
empl
oym
ent
insu
ran
ce �
������
������
������
������
������
���0�
30�
40�
40�
40�
40�
30�
30�
30�
30�
30�
30�
30�
30�
3O
ther
ret
irem
ent
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��0�
10�
10�
10�
1*
**
**
**
**
*E
xcis
e ta
xes
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���0�
50�
50�
50�
50�
60�
60�
50�
50�
50�
60�
60�
60�
50�
5E
stat
e an
d gi
ft t
axes
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��0�
10�
10�
10�
10�
10�
10�
10�
20�
20�
20�
20�
20�
10�
1C
ust
oms
duti
es ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�0�
20�
20�
20�
20�
20�
20�
20�
20�
20�
20�
20�
20�
20�
2D
epos
its
of e
arn
ings
, Fed
eral
Res
erve
Sys
tem
����
���0�
50�
60�
50�
30�
30�
20�
20�
20�
20�
20�
20�
20�
30�
3O
ther
mis
cell
aneo
us
rece
ipts
����
������
������
������
������
������
0�1
0�1
0�1
0�1
0�3
0�4
0�4
0�4
0�4
0�4
0�4
0�4
0�3
0�3
Tot
al r
ecei
pts
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��15
�115
�517
�118
�018
�918
�818
�819
�219
�319
�619
�619
�818
�318
�9
All
owan
ce f
or J
oin
t C
omm
itte
e d
efici
t re
du
ctio
n t
arge
t 4 ..
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
������
������
������
–0�3
–0�5
–0�7
–0�8
–0�8
–0�8
–0�8
–0�9
–0�9
–0�9
–0�6
–0�7
Defi
cit
.....
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
...9.
08.
86.
13.
92.
72.
83.
02.
42.
22.
22.
32.
33.
73.
0N
et in
tere
st 4
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�1�
41�
41�
51�
82�
22�
52�
72�
93�
03�
13�
13�
12�
12�
6P
rim
ary
defi
cit/
surp
lus
(–)
.....
......
......
......
......
....
7.6
7.4
4.6
2.1
0.5
0.3
0.3
–0.4
–0.8
–0.8
–0.8
–0.8
1.6
0.4
On
-bu
dget
defi
cit
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
9�5
9�2
6�5
4�3
3�1
3�2
3�4
2�8
2�6
2�6
2�6
2�6
4�1
3�4
Off
-bu
dget
su
rplu
s (–
) ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��–0
�5–0
�4–0
�4–0
�4–0
�4–0
�3–0
�4–0
�4–0
�4–0
�4–0
�3–0
�2–0
�4–0
�4
31SUMMARY TABLES 31T
able
S–5
. P
RO
PO
SE
D B
UD
GE
T B
Y C
AT
EG
OR
Y A
S A
PE
RC
EN
T O
F G
DP
—C
onti
nu
ed(A
s a
perc
ent
of G
DP
)
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Ave
rage
s20
12–
2016
2012
–20
21
Mem
oran
du
m, b
ud
get
auth
orit
y fo
r ap
pro
pri
ated
pro
gram
s: 1
Sec
uri
ty ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�6�
05�
75�
24�
54�
34�
14�
03�
93�
83�
73�
63�
54�
44�
1N
on-s
ecu
rity
���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���2�
82�
52�
32�
22�
12�
02�
01�
91�
91�
81�
81�
82�
12�
0
Su
btot
al, a
ppro
pria
ted
prog
ram
s ��
������
������
������
���8�
88�
17�
56�
76�
46�
26�
05�
85�
65�
55�
45�
36�
56�
0
*0�0
5 pe
rcen
t of
GD
P o
r le
ss�
1 D
iscr
etio
nar
y sp
endi
ng
leve
ls o
ther
th
an o
vers
eas
con
tin
gen
cy o
pera
tion
s re
flec
t th
e bu
dget
au
thor
ity
caps
un
der
the
Bu
dget
Con
trol
Act
of
2011
� T
he
spli
t of
di
scre
tion
ary
spen
din
g be
twee
n s
ecu
rity
an
d n
on-s
ecu
rity
aft
er 2
013
is b
ased
on
incr
easi
ng
budg
et a
uth
orit
y in
eac
h c
ateg
ory
by t
he
grow
th r
ate
in t
he
aggr
egat
e di
s-cr
etio
nar
y ca
p�2 O
utl
ays
for
TA
RP
in 2
011
and
subs
equ
ent
year
s re
sult
fro
m o
blig
atio
ns
incu
rred
th
rou
gh O
ctob
er 3
, 201
0 fo
r th
e H
ome
Aff
orda
ble
Mod
ifica
tion
Pro
gram
an
d ot
her
T
AR
P p
rogr
ams�
3 T
hes
e am
oun
ts r
epre
sen
t a
plac
ehol
der
for
maj
or d
isas
ters
req
uir
ing
Fed
eral
ass
ista
nce
for
reli
ef a
nd
reco
nst
ruct
ion
� S
uch
ass
ista
nce
mig
ht
be p
rovi
ded
in t
he
form
of
dis
cret
ion
ary
or m
anda
tory
ou
tlay
s or
tax
rel
ief�
Th
ese
amou
nts
are
incl
ude
d as
ou
tlay
s fo
r co
nve
nie
nce
�4 In
clu
des
debt
ser
vice
on
Joi
nt
Com
mit
tee
prop
osal
s�
32 MID-SESSION REVIEW32T
able
S–6
. P
RO
PO
SE
D B
UD
GE
T I
N P
OP
UL
AT
ION
- AN
D I
NF
LA
TIO
N-A
DJ
US
TE
D D
OL
LA
RS
(In
bil
lion
s of
con
stan
t do
llar
s, a
dju
sted
for
pop
ula
tion
gro
wth
)
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Ou
tlay
s:
App
ropr
iate
d ("
disc
reti
onar
y")
prog
ram
s: 1
Sec
uri
ty ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��86
078
272
869
768
367
366
766
065
464
7N
on-s
ecu
rity
���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
440
383
362
354
345
339
336
333
330
327
Su
btot
al, a
ppro
pria
ted
prog
ram
s ��
������
������
������
������
������
�����
1,30
01,
165
1,09
01,
051
1,02
81,
013
1,00
299
398
397
4
Man
dato
ry p
rogr
ams:
Soc
ial S
ecu
rity
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
768
790
810
831
853
875
899
924
950
976
Med
icar
e ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
478
509
523
531
561
564
568
599
625
651
Med
icai
d ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
266
277
328
353
374
389
402
417
431
448
Tro
ubl
ed A
sset
Rel
ief
Pro
gram
(T
AR
P)2
�����
������
������
������
������
�17
116
42
1*
**
������
���O
ther
man
dato
ry p
rogr
ams
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��60
254
354
656
559
457
856
457
958
159
5S
ubt
otal
, man
dato
ry p
rogr
ams
�����
������
������
������
������
������
�����
2,13
22,
130
2,21
32,
285
2,38
42,
407
2,43
32,
519
2,58
72,
671
Net
inte
rest
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���23
528
736
243
448
452
956
158
861
063
0A
dju
stm
ents
to
refl
ect
poss
ible
em
erge
nci
es3 ��
������
������
������
������
37
88
88
88
88
Tot
al o
utl
ays
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���3,
670
3,58
93,
673
3,77
73,
905
3,95
84,
005
4,10
84,
188
4,28
2
Rec
eip
ts:
Indi
vidu
al in
com
e ta
xes
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
1,20
91,
303
1,40
81,
496
1,57
71,
647
1,70
61,
757
1,80
51,
850
Cor
pora
tion
inco
me
taxe
s ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�33
339
645
439
335
238
938
137
936
737
2
Soc
ial i
nsu
ran
ce a
nd
reti
rem
ent
rece
ipts
:S
ocia
l Sec
uri
ty p
ayro
ll t
axes
���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��65
170
171
973
776
678
380
281
782
884
4M
edic
are
payr
oll t
axes
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
200
209
219
225
234
240
246
251
254
260
Un
empl
oym
ent
insu
ran
ce �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���55
5859
5858
5349
5047
47O
ther
ret
irem
ent
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��8
88
88
88
87
8E
xcis
e ta
xes
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��79
8592
9492
9496
104
105
107
Est
ate
and
gift
tax
es �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
1213
2224
2527
2829
3031
Cu
stom
s du
ties
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���34
3637
3839
3940
4142
42D
epos
its
of e
arn
ings
, Fed
eral
Res
erve
Sys
tem
����
������
������
������
��73
5441
3735
3739
4142
41O
ther
mis
cell
aneo
us
rece
ipts
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
1919
4963
6667
6871
7376
Tot
al r
ecei
pts
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��2,
674
2,88
03,
108
3,17
33,
252
3,38
43,
465
3,54
83,
601
3,67
7
All
owan
ce f
or J
oin
t C
omm
itte
e d
efici
t re
du
ctio
n t
arge
t4
–40
–79
–118
–127
–134
–142
–149
–156
–162
–171
Defi
cit
.....
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
..95
662
944
747
751
843
239
140
442
543
4N
et in
tere
st4 ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
234
286
357
422
467
506
533
554
570
584
Pri
mar
y d
efici
t/su
rplu
s (–
) ..
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
722
343
9055
51–7
4–1
41–1
49–1
45–1
49O
n-b
udg
et d
efici
t ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��1,
020
690
506
536
588
500
460
468
477
478
Off
-bu
dget
su
rplu
s (–
) ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�–6
4–6
1–5
9–5
9–6
9–6
9–6
9–6
4–5
2–4
4
33SUMMARY TABLES 33T
able
S–6
. P
RO
PO
SE
D B
UD
GE
T I
N P
OP
UL
AT
ION
- AN
D
INF
LA
TIO
N-A
DJ
US
TE
D D
OL
LA
RS
—C
onti
nu
ed(I
n b
illi
ons
of c
onst
ant
doll
ars,
adj
ust
ed f
or p
opu
lati
on g
row
th)
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Mem
oran
du
m, b
ud
get
auth
orit
y fo
r ap
pro
pri
ated
p
rogr
ams:
1
Sec
uri
ty ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
811
715
706
697
689
682
675
669
662
656
Non
-sec
uri
ty
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
360
352
349
345
341
338
335
333
330
327
Su
btot
al, a
ppro
pria
ted
prog
ram
s ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
���1,
170
1,06
71,
055
1,04
21,
030
1,02
01,
011
1,00
299
298
3
Mem
oran
du
m, i
nd
ex o
f pop
ula
tion
gro
wth
an
d in
flat
ion
....
.1�
001�
031�
061�
091�
121�
161�
191�
231�
271�
31
* $5
00 m
illi
on o
r le
ss�
1 D
iscr
etio
nar
y sp
endi
ng
leve
ls o
ther
th
an o
vers
eas
con
tin
gen
cy o
pera
tion
s re
flec
t th
e bu
dget
au
thor
ity
caps
un
der
the
Bu
dget
Con
trol
Act
of 2
011�
Th
e sp
lit
of d
iscr
e-ti
onar
y sp
endi
ng
betw
een
sec
uri
ty a
nd
non
-sec
uri
ty a
fter
201
3 is
bas
ed o
n in
crea
sin
g bu
dget
au
thor
ity
in e
ach
cat
egor
y by
th
e gr
owth
rat
e in
th
e ag
greg
ate
disc
reti
onar
y ca
p� 2 O
utl
ays
for
TA
RP
in 2
011
and
subs
equ
ent
year
s re
sult
fro
m o
blig
atio
ns
incu
rred
th
rou
gh O
ctob
er 3
, 201
0 fo
r th
e H
ome
Aff
orda
ble
Mod
ifica
tion
Pro
gram
an
d ot
her
T
AR
P p
rogr
ams�
3 T
hes
e am
oun
ts r
epre
sen
t a
plac
ehol
der
for
maj
or d
isas
ters
req
uir
ing
Fed
eral
ass
ista
nce
for
reli
ef a
nd
reco
nst
ruct
ion
� S
uch
ass
ista
nce
mig
ht
be p
rovi
ded
in t
he
form
of
dis
cret
ion
ary
or m
anda
tory
ou
tlay
s or
tax
rel
ief�
Th
ese
amou
nts
are
incl
ude
d as
ou
tlay
s fo
r co
nve
nie
nce
�4 In
clu
des
debt
ser
vice
on
Joi
nt
Com
mit
tee
prop
osal
s�
34 MID-SESSION REVIEW34T
able
S–7
. B
RID
GE
FR
OM
BU
DG
ET
EN
FO
RC
EM
EN
T A
CT
BA
SE
LIN
E T
O A
DJ
US
TE
D B
AS
EL
INE
(Defi
cit
incr
ease
s (+
) or
dec
reas
es (
–) in
bil
lion
s of
dol
lars
)
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
-20
1620
12-
2021
BE
A b
asel
ine
defi
cit
.....
......
......
......
......
......
......
.....
1,29
31,
314
1,01
165
447
552
658
549
344
946
849
551
03,
251
5,66
6
Ad
just
men
ts f
or c
urr
ent
pol
icy:
Inde
x to
infl
atio
n t
he
2011
par
amet
ers
of t
he
AM
T �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
1811
010
612
113
915
918
020
222
725
249
41,
513
Con
tin
ue
the
2001
an
d 20
03 t
ax c
uts
����
������
������
�����
������
������
���14
113
191
206
221
232
238
245
252
260
744
1,97
1E
xten
d es
tate
, gif
t, a
nd
gen
erat
ion
-ski
ppin
g tr
ansf
er t
axes
at
curr
ent
para
met
ers
�����
������
������
������
12
433
3741
4549
5357
6011
838
2P
reve
nt
redu
ctio
n in
Med
icar
e ph
ysic
ian
pa
ymen
ts �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
������
������
1322
2325
2830
3336
4043
111
293
Refl
ect
incr
emen
tal c
ost
of f
un
din
g ex
isti
ng
Pel
l m
axim
um
gra
nt
awar
d ��
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
������
������
-*-*
38
87
66
66
1850
Su
btot
al �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
���1
4624
935
639
743
647
350
654
258
162
21,
485
4,21
0
Ad
just
men
ts f
or p
rovi
sion
s co
nta
ined
in
th
e B
ud
get
Con
trol
Act
:
Set
dis
cret
iona
ry b
udge
t au
thor
ity
at c
ap le
vels
�����
������
������
������
–27
–54
–74
–87
–97
–104
–112
–120
–128
–138
–339
–942
Mak
e di
sast
er r
elie
f ca
p ad
just
men
ts 1
������
������
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
Mak
e pr
ogra
m in
tegr
ity
adju
stm
ents
����
������
������
�����
������
������
���–1
–3–4
–4–6
–6–7
–8–9
–9–1
7–5
6S
ubt
otal
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
������
���–2
7–5
7–7
8–9
2–1
02–1
10–1
19–1
28–1
37–1
47–3
56–9
97
Ad
just
men
t to
refl
ect
cost
s of
pos
sib
le
emer
gen
cies
2 .
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
....
������
���*
37
89
910
1010
1010
3686
Rec
lass
ify
surf
ace
tran
spor
tati
on o
utl
ays:
Rem
ove
outl
ays
from
app
ropr
iate
d ca
tego
ry �
������
–41
–46
–54
–50
–59
–60
–60
–61
–64
–65
–66
–67
–282
–606
Add
ou
tlay
s to
man
dato
ry c
ateg
ory
�����
������
������
����
4146
5450
5960
6061
6465
6667
282
606
Su
btot
al �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
Tot
al p
rogr
am a
dju
stm
ents
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
���2
2219
928
631
434
337
239
842
545
448
41,
165
3,29
8
Deb
t se
rvic
e on
adj
ust
men
ts �
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
**
211
2744
6384
105
130
156
8462
3T
otal
adj
ust
men
ts �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
222
201
297
342
387
435
481
530
584
640
1,24
93,
921
Ad
just
ed b
asel
ine
defi
cit
.....
......
......
......
......
......
..1,
293
1,31
61,
033
855
772
868
972
928
930
998
1,07
91,
151
4,50
09,
586
*$50
0 m
illi
on o
r le
ss�
1 O
MB
is in
th
e pr
oces
s of
dev
elop
ing
its
esti
mat
e of
th
e 10
-yea
r av
erag
e ca
lcu
lati
on fo
r di
sast
er r
elie
f pu
rsu
ant
to s
ecti
on 2
51(b
)(2)
(D) o
f th
e B
CA
� O
MB
's e
stim
ate
of
the
max
imu
m a
dju
stm
ent
for
2012
wil
l be
tran
smit
ted
to t
he
Con
gres
s w
hen
OM
B s
ubm
its
its
repo
rt in
com
plia
nce
wit
h s
ecti
on 2
51(b
)(2)
(D)(
ii)
of t
he
BC
A�
2 T
hes
e am
oun
ts r
epre
sen
t a
plac
ehol
der
for
maj
or d
isas
ters
req
uir
ing
Fed
eral
ass
ista
nce
for
reli
ef a
nd
reco
nst
ruct
ion
� S
uch
ass
ista
nce
mig
ht
be p
rovi
ded
in t
he
form
of
dis
cret
ion
ary
or m
anda
tory
ou
tlay
s or
tax
rel
ief�
Th
ese
amou
nts
are
incl
ude
d as
ou
tlay
s fo
r co
nve
nie
nce
�
35SUMMARY TABLES 35T
able
S–8
. C
HA
NG
E I
N T
HE
AD
JU
ST
ED
BA
SE
LIN
E F
RO
M B
UD
GE
T T
O M
SR
(In
bil
lion
s of
dol
lars
)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
-20
1620
12-
2021
Feb
ruar
y d
efici
ts i
n t
he
adju
sted
b
asel
ine
....
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
1,59
71,
090
846
770
841
938
890
891
960
1,04
51,
116
Per
cen
t of
GD
P
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
10�6
%6�
9%5�
1%4�
3%4�
5%4�
7%4�
3%4�
1%4�
2%4�
4%4�
5%
Con
cept
ual
ch
ange
s in
th
e ba
seli
ne:
Ext
end
expi
rin
g h
igh
-in
com
e ta
x cu
ts
and
curr
ent
esta
te t
ax r
elie
f ���
������
����
*13
4763
7791
101
108
115
122
130
290
866
Ext
end
expi
rin
g M
edic
are
phys
icia
n
paym
ent
reli
ef �
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
���13
2223
2528
3033
3640
4311
129
3D
ebt
serv
ice
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
��*
*1
410
1522
2937
4555
3021
8S
ubt
otal
, con
cept
ual
ch
ange
s ��
������
����
*26
6991
112
134
153
169
187
207
228
432
1,37
7
Rev
isio
ns
due
to e
nac
ted
legi
slat
ion
:B
udg
et C
ontr
ol A
ct �
������
������
������
������
������
–*–2
6–5
0–7
8–9
7–1
08–1
16–1
24–1
33–1
43–1
53–3
59–1
,028
2011
fu
ll-y
ear
appr
opri
atio
ns
�����
������
����
–20
–37
–38
–36
–32
–33
–34
–35
–36
–38
–38
–175
–357
Oth
er le
gisl
ativ
e ch
ange
s ��
������
������
������
�1
–*2
21
11
11
11
612
Deb
t se
rvic
e ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
–*–*
–2–7
–14
–21
–29
–38
–47
–56
–67
–44
–281
Su
btot
al, e
nac
ted
legi
slat
ion
���
������
���–1
9–6
3–8
9–1
19–1
41–1
61–1
78–1
96–2
15–2
35–2
57–5
73–1
,654
Rev
isio
ns
due
to u
pdat
ed e
con
omic
as
sum
ptio
ns:
Rec
eipt
s �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
–19
223
5054
5244
4142
4244
181
394
Man
dato
ry o
utl
ays
����
������
������
������
������
���–*
1417
2021
2222
2121
2226
9620
9N
et in
tere
st
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
12–2
–14
–15
29
1519
2327
30–2
093
Su
btot
al, e
con
omic
rev
isio
ns
����
������
��–7
1427
5578
8381
8186
9110
025
769
6
Rev
isio
ns
due
to u
pdat
ed t
ech
nic
al
assu
mpt
ion
s:R
ecei
pts
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��–1
23–6
7–3
0–3
9–3
3–3
2–2
7–2
4–2
8–3
2–3
7–2
00–3
47
Dis
cret
ion
ary
outl
ays:
Sec
uri
ty �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–5
616
3018
1213
1518
2124
2789
193
Non
-sec
uri
ty �
������
������
������
������
������
������
��–3
2612
98
88
77
77
6399
Man
dato
ry o
utl
ays:
R
efu
nda
ble
tax
cred
its
�����
������
������
������
86
811
1516
1616
1617
1856
139
Un
empl
oym
ent
com
pen
sati
on
������
����
–11
–15
–13
–12
–11
–11
–10
–9–9
–10
–11
–62
–112
Soc
ial S
ecu
rity
�����
������
������
������
������
������
�–2
–2–2
–2–1
*1
11
12
–7–2
Med
icai
d �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�–3
–3–3
–5–7
–8–9
–10
–12
–13
–17
–25
–87
Med
icar
e ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�–4
–4–1
–**
13
56
68
–424
Su
pple
men
tal N
utr
itio
n A
ssis
tan
ce
Pro
gram
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
��*
54
35
55
43
1–*
2235
Pu
rch
ases
of
GS
E p
refe
rred
sto
ck ��
���–2
5���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���V
eter
ans
ben
efits
�����
������
������
������
������
���–1
03
11
11
22
22
27
17O
ther
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
–24
87
21
–1–5
–6–6
–8–6
18–1
3
36 MID-SESSION REVIEW36T
able
S-8
. C
HA
NG
E I
N T
HE
AD
JU
ST
ED
BA
SE
LIN
E F
RO
M B
UD
GE
T T
O M
SR
—C
onti
nu
ed(I
n b
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
-20
1620
12-
2021
Net
inte
rest
���
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–2
–3–9
–13
–12
–15
–15
–18
–22
–25
–29
–52
–161
Cos
ts o
f po
ssib
le e
mer
gen
cies
�����
������
����
–2–3
–1–*
–*–*
–*���
������
������
������
������
������
���–6
–6S
ubt
otal
, tec
hn
ical
rev
isio
ns
����
������
��–2
55–3
51
–25
–21
–22
–16
–15
–20
–29
–37
–102
–220
Tot
al c
han
ges
sin
ce F
ebru
ary
�����
������
������
���–2
81–5
88
227
3439
4038
3435
1419
9
MS
R d
efici
ts i
n t
he
adju
sted
bas
elin
e .
...1,
316
1,03
385
577
286
897
292
893
099
81,
079
1,15
1P
erce
nt
of G
DP
���
������
������
������
������
������
������
���8�
8%6�
6%5�
2%4�
4%4�
7%5�
0%4�
5%4�
3%4�
5%4�
6%4�
7%
Mem
oran
dum
:
Feb
ruar
y fu
ndi
ng
("bu
dget
ary
reso
urc
es")
fo
r ap
prop
riat
ed p
rogr
ams
�����
������
������
��1,
231
1,28
71,
307
1,33
71,
366
1,39
61,
428
1,46
11,
496
1,53
21,
569
Ch
ange
in f
un
din
g:S
ecu
rity
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
–2–1
9–3
3–3
7–4
1–4
5–4
7–5
0–5
3–5
6–6
0–1
75–4
41N
on-s
ecu
rity
����
������
������
������
������
������
�����
–11
–63
–62
–65
–67
–70
–72
–75
–77
–81
–85
–328
–717
Tot
al c
han
ge in
fu
ndi
ng
����
������
������
–13
–82
–95
–103
–108
–115
–119
–125
–130
–137
–145
–503
–1,1
58M
SR
fund
ing
for
appr
opri
ated
pro
gram
s ���
�� 1,
218
1,20
51,
212
1,23
41,
257
1,28
11,
308
1,33
71,
366
1,39
51,
425
*$50
0 m
illi
on o
r le
ss�
37SUMMARY TABLES 37T
able
S–9
. M
AN
DA
TO
RY
AN
D R
EC
EIP
T P
RO
PO
SA
LS
FR
OM
TH
E F
EB
RU
AR
Y B
UD
GE
T(D
efici
t in
crea
ses
(+)
or d
ecre
ases
(–)
in m
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
Tax
Pro
visi
ons:
Tax
Cu
ts f
or F
amil
ies
and
In
div
idu
als:
Ext
end
earn
ed in
com
e ta
x cr
edit
for
larg
er
fam
ilie
s1 ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
������
������
811,
422
1,44
21,
469
1,50
91,
544
1,57
91,
610
1,65
74,
414
12,3
13E
xpan
d ch
ild
and
depe
nde
nt
care
tax
cre
dit1 �
����
������
283
1,04
31,
045
1,04
21,
039
1,03
51,
036
1,03
31,
028
1,02
14,
452
9,60
5P
rovi
de f
or a
uto
mat
ic e
nro
llm
ent
in I
RA
s,
incl
udi
ng
empl
oyer
tax
cre
dit,
an
d do
ubl
e th
e ta
x cr
edit
for
sm
all e
mpl
oyer
pla
n
star
tup
cost
s1 ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���63
81,
043
1,10
01,
240
1,44
81,
704
2,01
52,
381
2,80
94,
021
14,3
78E
xten
d A
mer
ican
opp
ortu
nit
y ta
x cr
edit
1 ����
����
������
������
������
650
10,7
7210
,832
11,5
5211
,533
11,3
6412
,111
12,1
1712
,665
33,8
0693
,596
Pro
vide
exc
lusi
on f
rom
inco
me
for
stu
den
t lo
an f
orgi
ven
ess �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
Tax
qu
alifi
ed d
ivid
ends
an
d n
et lo
ng-
term
ca
pita
l gai
ns
at a
20-
perc
ent
rate
for
upp
er-
inco
me
taxp
ayer
s ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
7,86
89,
582
5,40
59,
416
12,9
6414
,688
15,1
1915
,586
16,1
5816
,885
45,2
3512
3,67
1T
otal
, tax
cu
ts f
or f
amil
ies
and
indi
vidu
als �
������
���8,
151
11,9
9419
,687
23,8
3228
,264
30,2
1330
,767
32,3
2433
,294
35,0
3791
,928
253,
563
Tax
Cu
ts f
or B
usi
nes
ses:
Eli
min
ate
capi
tal g
ain
s ta
xati
on o
n
inve
stm
ents
in s
mal
l bu
sin
ess
stoc
k ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���18
356
61,
055
1,58
72,
026
������
���5,
417
En
han
ce a
nd
mak
e pe
rman
ent
the
rese
arch
an
d ex
peri
men
tati
on t
ax c
redi
t ����
������
������
����
������
���4,
610
8,06
38,
884
9,70
810
,520
11,3
1812
,103
12,8
8713
,686
14,4
9941
,785
106,
278
Pro
vide
add
itio
nal
tax
cre
dits
for
inve
stm
ent
in q
ual
ified
pro
pert
y u
sed
in a
qu
alifi
ed
adva
nce
d en
ergy
man
ufa
ctu
rin
g pr
ojec
t ����
����
������
284
731
1,08
91,
138
578
120
–73
–115
–64
–27
3,82
03,
661
Pro
vide
tax
cre
dit
for
ener
gy e
ffici
ent
com
mer
cial
bu
ildi
ng
prop
erty
exp
endi
ture
s in
pla
ce o
f ex
isti
ng
tax
dedu
ctio
n ���
������
������
�����
������
450
425
100
2525
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���1,
025
1,02
5T
otal
, tax
cu
ts f
or b
usi
nes
ses
������
������
������
������
������
���5,
344
9,21
910
,073
10,8
7111
,123
11,6
2112
,596
13,8
2715
,209
16,4
9846
,630
116,
381
Ince
nti
ves
to p
rom
ote
regi
onal
gro
wth
:E
xten
d an
d m
odif
y th
e N
ew M
arke
ts t
ax
cred
it ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
4162
116
183
234
263
272
264
243
170
6385
81,
870
Ref
orm
an
d ex
ten
d B
uil
d A
mer
ica
bon
ds1 �
������
12
22
43
33
33
313
28R
efor
m a
nd
expa
nd
the
Low
-In
com
e H
ousi
ng
Tax
Cre
dit
(LIH
TC
) ����
������
������
������
������
������
����
15
1632
5271
9411
613
916
218
517
687
2D
esig
nat
e G
row
th Z
ones
1 ����
������
������
������
������
�����
������
���27
986
386
083
981
518
6–3
83–3
74–3
29–2
733,
656
2,48
3T
otal
, in
cen
tive
s to
pro
mot
e re
gion
al g
row
th
4334
899
71,
077
1,12
91,
152
555
������
���11
6–2
24,
703
5,25
3C
onti
nu
e ce
rtai
n e
xpir
ing
pro
visi
ons
thro
ugh
cal
end
ar y
ear
2012
1 ....
......
......
....
866
9,95
910
,459
734
372
158
6195
122
169
192
21,6
8222
,321
Pay
for
Th
ree
Yea
rs o
f A
MT
Rel
ief:
Red
uce
th
e va
lue
of c
erta
in t
ax
expe
ndi
ture
s ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
–6,0
08–1
8,99
6–2
6,41
8–2
9,76
6–3
2,69
6–3
5,69
9–3
8,64
4–4
1,49
6–4
4,38
8–4
7,18
0–1
13,8
84–3
21,2
91
38 MID-SESSION REVIEW38T
able
S–9
. M
AN
DA
TO
RY
AN
D R
EC
EIP
T P
RO
PO
SA
LS
FR
OM
T
HE
FE
BR
UA
RY
BU
DG
ET
—C
onti
nu
ed(D
efici
t in
crea
ses
(+)
or d
ecre
ases
(–)
in m
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
Oth
er R
even
ue
Ch
ange
s an
d L
oop
hol
e C
lose
rs:
Ref
orm
tre
atm
ent
of fi
nan
cial
inst
itu
tion
s an
d pr
odu
cts:
Impo
se a
fin
anci
al c
risi
s re
spon
sibi
lity
fe
e ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
–1,0
00–3
,000
–3,0
00–3
,000
–4,0
00–4
,000
–4,0
00–4
,000
–4,0
00–1
0,00
0–3
0,00
0R
equ
ire
accr
ual
of
inco
me
on f
orw
ard
sale
of
corp
orat
e st
ock
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�–1
–6–1
2–1
9–2
6–3
3–3
6–3
8–4
0–4
2–4
4–9
6–2
96R
equ
ire
ordi
nar
y tr
eatm
ent
of in
com
e fr
om
day-
to-d
ay d
eale
r ac
tivi
ties
for
cer
tain
de
aler
s of
equ
ity
opti
ons
and
com
mod
itie
s –3
5–1
44–2
26–2
40–2
54–2
70–2
86–3
03–3
21–3
41–3
61–1
,134
–2,7
46M
odif
y th
e de
fin
itio
n o
f “co
ntr
ol”
for
purp
oses
of
sect
ion
249
of
the
Inte
rnal
R
even
ue
Cod
e ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
���–9
–15
–16
–17
–17
–18
–19
–20
–21
–22
–74
–174
Tot
al, r
efor
m t
reat
men
t of
fin
anci
al
inst
itu
tion
s an
d pr
odu
cts
������
������
������
�–3
6–1
59–1
,253
–3,2
75–3
,297
–3,3
20–4
,340
–4,3
60–4
,381
–4,4
04–4
,427
–11,
304
–33,
216
Rei
nst
ate
Su
perf
un
d ta
xes
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
–1,3
74–1
,926
–2,0
38–2
,093
–2,1
44–2
,185
–2,2
12–2
,246
–2,2
72–2
,329
–9,5
75–2
0,81
9In
crea
se O
il S
pill
Lia
bili
ty T
rust
Fu
nd
fin
anci
ng
rate
by
one
cen
t ���
������
������
������
������
����
������
–35
–46
–46
–46
–46
–46
–46
–47
–46
–47
–219
–451
Mak
e u
nem
ploy
men
t in
sura
nce
su
rtax
pe
rman
ent �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
���–1
,375
–1,4
13–1
,449
–1,4
77–1
,503
–1,5
26–1
,543
–1,5
58–1
,577
–1,5
94–7
,217
–15,
015
Rep
eal L
IFO
met
hod
of
acco
un
tin
g fo
r in
ven
tori
es ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–2
,598
–5,6
49–6
,484
–6,4
57–6
,435
–6,3
87–6
,337
–6,2
93–6
,240
–21,
188
–52,
880
Rep
eal g
ain
lim
itat
ion
for
div
iden
ds r
ecei
ved
in r
eorg
aniz
atio
n e
xch
ange
s ����
������
������
������
������
������
–47
–79
–81
–84
–86
–89
–92
–94
–97
–100
–377
–849
Ref
orm
U�S
� in
tern
atio
nal
tax
sys
tem
:D
efer
ded
uct
ion
of
inte
rest
exp
ense
rel
ated
to
def
erre
d in
com
e����
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
���–2
,986
–5,1
38–5
,396
–5,6
36–5
,861
–6,0
80–3
,114
–1,1
03–1
,149
–1,2
02–2
5,01
7–3
7,66
5D
eter
min
e th
e fo
reig
n t
ax c
redi
t on
a
pool
ing
basi
s ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
–2,6
55–4
,568
–4,7
98–5
,011
–5,2
11–5
,406
–5,6
01–5
,810
–6,0
51–6
,333
–22,
243
–51,
444
Tax
cu
rren
tly
exce
ss r
etu
rns
asso
ciat
ed
wit
h t
ran
sfer
s of
inta
ngi
bles
off
shor
e ����
������
������
–1,2
04–2
,038
–2,1
14–2
,212
–2,2
80–2
,290
–2,2
31–2
,158
–2,1
38–2
,166
–9,8
48–2
0,83
1L
imit
sh
ifti
ng
of in
com
e th
rou
gh in
tan
gibl
e pr
oper
ty t
ran
sfer
s ����
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
���–2
9–6
3–9
0–1
18–1
48–1
78–2
09–2
42–2
76–3
15–4
48–1
,668
Dis
allo
w t
he
dedu
ctio
n f
or e
xces
s n
on-t
axed
re
insu
ran
ce p
rem
ium
s pa
id t
o af
fili
ates
���
������
���–1
29–2
23–2
37–2
50–2
64–2
77–2
89–3
02–3
15–3
28–1
,103
–2,6
14L
imit
ear
nin
gs s
trip
pin
g by
exp
atri
ated
en
titi
es ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–2
12–3
64–3
82–4
01–4
21–4
42–4
64–4
87–5
12–5
37–1
,780
–4,2
22M
odif
y ta
x ru
les
for
dual
cap
acit
y ta
xpay
ers
������
���–5
32–9
18–9
74–1
,031
–1,0
85–1
,138
–1,1
90–1
,242
–1,2
96–1
,352
–4,5
40–1
0,75
8T
otal
, ref
orm
U�S
� in
tern
atio
nal
tax
sy
stem
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
–7,7
47–1
3,31
2–1
3,99
1–1
4,65
9–1
5,27
0–1
5,81
1–1
3,09
8–1
1,34
4–1
1,73
7–1
2,23
3–6
4,97
9–1
29,2
02
39SUMMARY TABLES 39T
able
S–9
. M
AN
DA
TO
RY
AN
D R
EC
EIP
T P
RO
PO
SA
LS
FR
OM
T
HE
FE
BR
UA
RY
BU
DG
ET
—C
onti
nu
ed(D
efici
t in
crea
ses
(+)
or d
ecre
ases
(–)
in m
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
Ref
orm
tre
atm
ent
of in
sura
nce
com
pan
ies
and
prod
uct
s:M
odif
y ru
les
that
app
ly t
o sa
les
of li
fe
insu
ran
ce c
ontr
acts
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–8
–42
–82
–97
–115
–134
–154
–177
–203
–231
–344
–1,2
43M
odif
y di
vide
nds
-rec
eive
d de
duct
ion
for
life
in
sura
nce
com
pan
y se
para
te a
ccou
nts
�����
������
���–1
72–4
65–5
47–5
79–6
05–6
07–5
85–5
55–5
28–5
03–2
,368
–5,1
46E
xpan
d pr
o-ra
ta in
tere
st e
xpen
se
disa
llow
ance
for
cor
pora
te-o
wn
ed li
fe
insu
ran
ce (
CO
LI)
�����
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
���–2
1–7
1–1
81–2
73–4
33–6
52–9
00–1
,280
–1,7
14–2
,166
–979
–7,6
91T
otal
, ref
orm
tre
atm
ent
of in
sura
nce
co
mpa
nie
s an
d pr
odu
cts
������
������
������
������
������
–201
–578
–810
–949
–1,1
53–1
,393
–1,6
39–2
,012
–2,4
45–2
,900
–3,6
91–1
4,08
0
Eli
min
ate
foss
il f
uel
tax
pre
fere
nce
s:
Eli
min
ate
coal
pre
fere
nce
s:R
epea
l exp
ensi
ng
of e
xplo
rati
on a
nd
deve
lopm
ent
cost
s ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
–27
–45
–47
–49
–51
–50
–48
–47
–45
–38
–219
–447
Rep
eal p
erce
nta
ge d
eple
tion
for
har
d m
iner
al f
ossi
l fu
els �
������
������
������
������
�����
������
���–7
8–1
29–1
29–1
30–1
35–1
39–1
45–1
49–1
54–1
65–6
01–1
,353
Rep
eal c
apit
al g
ain
s tr
eatm
ent
for
roya
ltie
s ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�–6
–11
–13
–22
–31
–38
–43
–47
–51
–55
–58
–115
–369
Rep
eal d
omes
tic
man
ufa
ctu
rin
g de
duct
ion
for
coa
l an
d ot
her
har
d m
iner
al f
ossi
l fu
els �
������
������
������
������
�����
������
���–2
0–3
5–3
8–3
9–4
1–4
4–4
5–4
8–4
9–5
1–1
73–4
10T
otal
, eli
min
ate
coal
pre
fere
nce
s ���
���–6
–136
–222
–236
–249
–265
–276
–285
–295
–303
–312
–1,1
08–2
,579
Eli
min
ate
oil a
nd
gas
pref
eren
ces:
Rep
eal e
nh
ance
d oi
l rec
over
y cr
edit
�����
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
Rep
eal c
redi
t fo
r oi
l an
d ga
s pr
odu
ced
from
mar
gin
al w
ells
�����
������
������
������
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���R
epea
l exp
ensi
ng
of in
tan
gibl
e dr
illi
ng
cost
s ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
–1,8
75–2
,512
–1,7
62–1
,403
–1,3
31–1
,124
–830
–640
–523
–447
–8,8
83–1
2,44
7R
epea
l ded
uct
ion
for
ter
tiar
y in
ject
ants
���
������
–6–1
0–1
0–1
0–1
0–1
0–9
–9–9
–9–4
6–9
2R
epea
l exc
epti
on t
o pa
ssiv
e lo
ss
lim
itat
ion
s fo
r w
orki
ng
inte
rest
s in
oi
l an
d n
atu
ral g
as p
rope
rtie
s ����
������
�����
������
–23
–27
–24
–22
–21
–19
–18
–17
–16
–16
–117
–203
Rep
eal p
erce
nta
ge d
eple
tion
for
oil
an
d n
atu
ral g
as w
ells
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
–607
–1,0
38–1
,079
–1,1
11–1
,142
–1,1
77–1
,211
–1,2
43–1
,273
–1,3
21–4
,977
–11,
202
Rep
eal d
omes
tic
man
ufa
ctu
rin
g de
duct
ion
for
oil
an
d n
atu
ral g
as
com
pan
ies �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
–902
–1,5
58–1
,653
–1,7
49–1
,842
–1,9
32–2
,020
–2,1
08–2
,200
–2,2
96–7
,704
–18,
260
40 MID-SESSION REVIEW40T
able
S–9
. M
AN
DA
TO
RY
AN
D R
EC
EIP
T P
RO
PO
SA
LS
FR
OM
T
HE
FE
BR
UA
RY
BU
DG
ET
—C
onti
nu
ed(D
efici
t in
crea
ses
(+)
or d
ecre
ases
(–)
in m
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
Incr
ease
geo
logi
cal a
nd
geop
hys
ical
am
orti
zati
on p
erio
d fo
r in
depe
nde
nt
prod
uce
rs t
o se
ven
yea
rs ��
������
������
������
������
���–5
9–2
15–3
30–3
06–2
30–1
52–7
5–2
2–9
–10
–1,1
40–1
,408
Tot
al, e
lim
inat
e oi
l an
d ga
s pr
efer
ence
s ���
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
���–3
,472
–5,3
60–4
,858
–4,6
01–4
,576
–4,4
14–4
,163
–4,0
39–4
,030
–4,0
99–2
2,86
7–4
3,61
2T
otal
, eli
min
ate
foss
il f
uel
tax
pr
efer
ence
s ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
–6–3
,608
–5,5
82–5
,094
–4,8
50–4
,841
–4,6
90–4
,448
–4,3
34–4
,333
–4,4
11–2
3,97
5–4
6,19
1T
ax c
arri
ed (
profi
ts)
inte
rest
s as
ord
inar
y in
com
e ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��–3
18–2
,274
–2,1
23–2
,154
–1,9
27–1
,608
–1,3
22–1
,089
–908
–762
–640
–10,
086
–14,
807
Den
y de
duct
ion
for
pu
nit
ive
dam
ages
�����
������
�����
������
������
���–2
3–3
4–3
5–3
5–3
6–3
6–3
7–3
7–3
9–1
27–3
12R
epea
l low
er-o
f-co
st-o
r-m
arke
t in
ven
tory
ac
cou
nti
ng
met
hod
�����
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
������
������
–188
–1,4
35–2
,334
–1,5
32–1
,358
–309
–323
–337
–352
–5,4
89–8
,168
Sim
plif
y th
e ta
x co
de ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
��–1
6–7
–35
1223
–141
–147
281
176
107
138
–148
407
Red
uce
th
e ta
x ga
p an
d m
ake
refo
rms:
Exp
and
info
rmat
ion
rep
orti
ng:
Rep
eal a
nd
mod
ify
info
rmat
ion
re
port
ing
on p
aym
ents
to
corp
orat
ion
s an
d pa
ymen
ts f
or
prop
erty
6 ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
���47
561
875
692
996
11,
000
1,04
71,
096
1,14
71,
180
3,73
99,
209
Req
uir
e in
form
atio
n r
epor
tin
g fo
r pr
ivat
e se
para
te a
ccou
nts
of
life
in
sura
nce
com
pan
ies
������
������
������
������
�����
������
������
���–1
–2–3
–3–4
–5–6
–7–8
–9–3
9R
equ
ire
a ce
rtifi
ed T
axpa
yer
Iden
tifi
cati
on N
um
ber
from
co
ntr
acto
rs a
nd
allo
w c
erta
in
wit
hh
oldi
ng
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
–21
–48
–81
–110
–115
–121
–126
–132
–138
–144
–150
–475
–1,1
65T
otal
, exp
and
info
rmat
ion
rep
orti
ng �
–21
427
536
644
811
837
870
910
952
996
1,02
23,
255
8,00
5Im
prov
e co
mpl
ian
ce b
y bu
sin
esse
s:R
equ
ire
grea
ter
elec
tron
ic fi
lin
g of
re
turn
s ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
Au
thor
ize
the
Dep
artm
ent
of t
he
Tre
asu
ry t
o re
quir
e ad
diti
onal
in
form
atio
n t
o be
incl
ude
d in
el
ectr
onic
ally
file
d F
orm
550
0 A
nn
ual
Rep
orts
�����
������
������
������
������
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���Im
plem
ent
stan
dard
s cl
arif
yin
g w
hen
em
ploy
ee le
asin
g co
mpa
nie
s ca
n b
e h
eld
liab
le f
or t
hei
r cl
ien
ts’ F
eder
al
empl
oym
ent
taxe
s ����
������
������
������
������
�����
������
–4–5
–6–6
–6–7
–7–7
–8–8
–27
–64
Incr
ease
cer
tain
ty w
ith
res
pect
to
wor
ker
clas
sifi
cati
on ��
������
������
������
������
������
���–1
2–2
30–1
,237
–956
–819
–904
–994
–1,0
88–1
,186
–1,2
84–3
,254
–8,7
10
41SUMMARY TABLES 41T
able
S–9
. M
AN
DA
TO
RY
AN
D R
EC
EIP
T P
RO
PO
SA
LS
FR
OM
T
HE
FE
BR
UA
RY
BU
DG
ET
—C
onti
nu
ed(D
efici
t in
crea
ses
(+)
or d
ecre
ases
(–)
in m
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
Rep
eal s
peci
al e
stim
ated
tax
pay
men
t pr
ovis
ion
for
cer
tain
insu
ran
ce
com
pan
ies �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���E
lim
inat
e sp
ecia
l ru
les
mod
ifyi
ng
the
amou
nt
of e
stim
ated
tax
pay
men
ts
by c
orpo
rati
ons �
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
������
������
������
���53
,610
–4,3
20–4
9,29
0���
������
������
���5,
630
–5,6
30���
������
������
������
������
Tot
al, i
mpr
ove
com
plia
nce
by
busi
nes
ses
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
–16
–235
52,3
67–5
,282
–50,
115
–911
–1,0
014,
535
–6,8
24–1
,292
–3,2
81–8
,774
Str
engt
hen
tax
adm
inis
trat
ion
�����
������
������
����
������
���–1
3–1
8–2
0–2
5–2
8–3
0–3
0–3
2–3
3–3
4–1
04–2
63
Exp
and
pen
alti
es:
Impo
se a
pen
alty
on
fai
lure
to
com
ply
wit
h e
lect
ron
ic fi
lin
g re
quir
emen
ts ��
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
–1–1
–1–2
–2–2
–1–9
Incr
ease
pen
alty
impo
sed
on p
aid
prep
arer
s w
ho
fail
to
com
ply
wit
h
EIT
C d
ue
dili
gen
ce r
equ
irem
ents
�����
����
������
–13
–27
–31
–32
–34
–35
–35
–36
–37
–38
–137
–318
Tot
al, e
xpan
d pe
nal
ties
������
������
������
������
�����
������
–13
–27
–31
–32
–35
–36
–36
–38
–39
–40
–138
–327
Mod
ify
esta
te a
nd
gift
tax
val
uat
ion
di
scou
nts
an
d m
ake
oth
er r
efor
ms:
Mak
e pe
rman
ent
the
port
abil
ity
of
un
use
d ex
empt
ion
bet
wee
n s
pou
ses
�����
������
������
������
������
107
217
321
421
516
609
699
791
645
3,68
1R
equ
ire
con
sist
ency
in v
alu
e fo
r tr
ansf
er a
nd
inco
me
tax
purp
oses
������
������
���–1
27–1
71–1
82–1
92–2
04–2
16–2
29–2
43–2
58–2
73–8
76–2
,095
Mod
ify
rule
s on
val
uat
ion
dis
cou
nts
�����
����
������
–806
–860
–1,5
58–1
,687
–1,8
23–1
,966
–2,1
16–2
,277
–2,4
44–2
,629
–6,7
34–1
8,16
6R
equ
ire
a m
inim
um
ter
m f
or g
ran
tor
reta
ined
an
nu
ity
tru
sts
(GR
AT
s) ��
�����
������
���–1
5–4
6–9
3–1
60–2
31–3
08–3
89–4
77–5
70–6
70–5
45–2
,959
Lim
it D
ura
tion
of
Gen
erat
ion
Ski
ppin
g T
ran
sfer
(G
ST
) Tax
Exe
mpt
ion
�����
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���T
otal
, mod
ify
esta
te a
nd
gift
tax
va
luat
ion
dis
cou
nts
an
d m
ake
oth
er
refo
rms
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
���–9
48–1
,077
–1,7
26–1
,822
–1,9
37–2
,069
–2,2
18–2
,388
–2,5
73–2
,781
–7,5
10–1
9,53
9T
otal
, red
uce
th
e ta
x ga
p an
d m
ake
refo
rms
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
–21
–563
–821
51,2
34–6
,350
–51,
278
–2,1
76–2
,375
3,02
9–8
,473
–3,1
25–7
,778
–20,
898
Tot
al, o
ther
rev
enu
e ch
ange
s an
d lo
oph
ole
clos
ers
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–3
97–1
7,39
0–2
9,97
715
,190
–44,
562
–89,
414
–41,
554
–37,
353
–30,
416
–42,
706
–38,
299
–166
,153
–356
,481
Tra
de
Init
iati
ves:
Pro
mot
e tr
ade �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
167
371
514
636
755
837
910
982
1,05
31,
127
2,44
37,
352
Oth
er I
nit
iati
ves:
Au
thor
ize
the
lim
ited
sh
arin
g of
bu
sin
ess
tax
retu
rn in
form
atio
n t
o im
prov
e th
e ac
cura
cy
of im
port
ant
econ
omic
mea
sure
s ���
������
������
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
42 MID-SESSION REVIEW42T
able
S–9
. M
AN
DA
TO
RY
AN
D R
EC
EIP
T P
RO
PO
SA
LS
FR
OM
T
HE
FE
BR
UA
RY
BU
DG
ET
—C
onti
nu
ed(D
efici
t in
crea
ses
(+)
or d
ecre
ases
(–)
in m
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
Eli
min
ate
cert
ain
rev
iew
s co
ndu
cted
by
the
U�S
� Tre
asu
ry I
nsp
ecto
r G
ener
al f
or T
ax
Adm
inis
trat
ion
(T
IGT
A) �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���M
odif
y in
dexi
ng
to p
reve
nt
defl
atio
nar
y ad
just
men
ts ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
Tot
al, o
ther
init
iati
ves
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���
Rea
uth
oriz
e S
urf
ace
Tra
nsp
orta
tion
:
Tra
nsp
orta
tion
Tru
st F
un
d:O
utl
ays
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
6,72
619
,053
16,2
3017
,980
21,9
6527
,117
30,4
1231
,731
32,2
0732
,077
109,
071
235,
498
Bip
arti
san
fin
anci
ng
for
Tra
nsp
orta
tion
Tru
st
Fu
nd �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
–20,
000
–28,
000
–29,
000
–31,
000
–32,
000
–34,
000
–36,
000
–38,
000
–39,
000
–41,
000
–140
,000
–328
,000
Su
btot
al, t
ran
spor
tati
on t
rust
fu
nd
������
������
�����
������
–13,
274
–8,9
47–1
2,77
0–1
3,02
0–1
0,03
5–6
,883
–5,5
88–6
,269
–6,7
93–8
,923
–58,
046
–92,
502
Upf
ron
t in
vest
men
t in
avi
atio
n ���
������
������
������
������
�����
������
596
2,14
660
8���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
3,35
03,
350
Upf
ron
t in
vest
men
t in
TIG
ER
gra
nts
�����
������
������
�����
������
2042
068
040
020
014
010
040
������
������
������
1,86
02,
000
Tot
al, r
eau
thor
ize
surf
ace
tran
spor
tati
on
......
...–1
2,65
8–6
,381
–11,
482
–12,
620
–9,8
35–6
,743
–5,4
88–6
,229
–6,7
93–8
,923
–52,
976
–87,
152
Man
dat
ory
Init
iati
ves
and
Sav
ings
:
Agr
icu
ltu
re:
Ch
ange
com
pan
y re
imbu
rsem
ent
on c
rop
insu
ran
ce C
AT
pre
miu
m ��
������
������
������
������
����
������
���–1
61–1
66–1
76–1
79–1
80–1
81–1
83–1
84–1
85–1
87–8
62–1
,782
Eli
min
ate
cott
on a
nd
pean
ut
stor
age
paym
ents
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
–1���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
–1–1
En
act
An
imal
Pla
nt
and
Hea
lth
In
spec
tion
S
ervi
ce (
AP
HIS
) fe
es ���
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
���–2
0–2
7–2
7–2
8–2
9–3
0–3
1–3
2–3
3–3
4–1
31–2
91E
nac
t F
ood
Saf
ety
and
Insp
ecti
on S
ervi
ce
(FS
IS)
perf
orm
ance
fee
�����
������
������
������
������
����
������
���–1
1–1
2–1
2–1
2–1
3–1
3–1
3–1
3–1
3–1
3–6
0–1
25E
nac
t G
rain
In
spec
tion
, Pac
kers
, an
d S
tock
yard
s A
dmin
istr
atio
n (
GIP
SA
) fe
es ��
�����
������
–27
–29
–30
–31
–31
–31
–32
–32
–32
–33
–148
–308
En
act
Nat
ura
l Res
ourc
es C
onse
rvat
ion
S
ervi
ce (
NR
CS
) fe
e ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–2
2–2
2–2
2–2
2–2
2–2
2–2
2–2
2–2
2–2
2–1
10–2
20E
nac
t F
ores
t S
ervi
ce p
aym
ent
to
com
mu
nit
ies—
impa
ct o
n t
imbe
r re
ceip
ts ��
�����
������
������
���–4
8–4
9–4
9–5
0–5
2���
������
������
������
������
������
���–1
96–2
48S
usp
end
SN
AP
tim
e li
mit
s fo
r ab
le-b
odie
d w
orki
ng-
age
adu
lts
wit
hou
t de
pen
den
ts ��
������
������
9051
1���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
142
142
Res
tore
SN
AP
ben
efici
ary
paym
ents
te
rmin
ated
in P
�L� 1
11–2
96 ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���3,
239
56���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���3,
295
3,29
5R
edu
ce c
omm
odit
y pa
ymen
ts t
o w
ealt
hy
farm
ers
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
������
������
–228
–261
–312
–315
–265
–278
–285
–284
–283
–1,1
16–2
,511
Impo
se b
ioba
sed
labe
lin
g fe
e ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���T
otal
, Agr
icu
ltu
re ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
���–1
52–4
812,
663
–577
–640
–594
–559
–568
–569
–572
813
–2,0
49
43SUMMARY TABLES 43T
able
S–9
. M
AN
DA
TO
RY
AN
D R
EC
EIP
T P
RO
PO
SA
LS
FR
OM
T
HE
FE
BR
UA
RY
BU
DG
ET
—C
onti
nu
ed(D
efici
t in
crea
ses
(+)
or d
ecre
ases
(–)
in m
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
Def
ense
:
Sh
ift
futu
re U
nif
orm
ed S
ervi
ces
Fam
ily
Hea
lth
Pla
n e
nro
llee
s in
to T
RIC
AR
E-f
or-
Lif
e/M
edic
are:
Eff
ect
on M
edic
are
Eli
gibl
e R
etir
ee H
ealt
h
Car
e F
un
d����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
���–1
–4–1
2–2
4–4
3–6
8–9
9–1
37–1
83–2
38–8
4–8
09E
ffec
t on
acc
rual
pay
men
ts (
non
-PA
YG
O) �
������
������
������
���75
980
585
088
994
51,
004
1,06
71,
134
1,20
53,
303
8,65
8S
ubt
otal
, sh
ift
futu
re U
nif
orm
ed
Ser
vice
s Fa
mil
y H
ealt
h P
lan
en
roll
ees
into
TR
ICA
RE
-For
-Lif
e/M
edic
are �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
–175
579
382
684
687
790
593
095
196
73,
219
7,84
9P
rovi
de a
ddit
ion
al a
ccru
al p
aym
ents
to
the
Med
icar
e E
ligi
ble
Ret
iree
Hea
lth
Car
e F
un
d (n
on-P
AY
GO
) ����
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
���–1
17���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
–117
–117
Tot
al, D
efen
se ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
–175
579
382
684
687
790
593
095
196
73,
219
7,84
9
Edu
cati
on:
Pel
l Gra
nt
Pro
tect
ion
Act
:P
rovi
de m
anda
tory
app
ropr
iati
on t
o su
stai
n
rece
nt
Pel
l Gra
nt
incr
ease
s 7 ����
������
������
������
������
���2,
069
6,27
72,
995
3,38
93,
775
4,20
04,
628
5,05
65,
489
5,98
618
,505
43,8
64E
lim
inat
e in
-sch
ool i
nte
rest
su
bsid
ies
for
grad
uat
e an
d pr
ofes
sion
al s
tude
nts
8 ����
����
������
���–9
84–3
,200
–3,0
39–3
,019
–3,0
22–3
,041
–3,1
10–3
,211
–3,3
12–3
,343
–13,
264
–29,
281
Pro
vide
cu
rren
t bo
rrow
ers
ince
nti
ve t
o co
nve
rt f
rom
gu
aran
teed
loan
s to
dir
ect
loan
s to
sim
plif
y lo
an s
ervi
cin
g ����
������
������
����
������
–2,1
36–2
0–1
6–1
0–1
0–1
0–1
1–1
1–1
3–7
–2,1
92–2
,244
Eli
min
ate
year
-rou
nd
Pel
l Gra
nts
an
d si
mpl
ify
stu
den
t ai
d ap
plic
atio
n 9 �
������
������
�–6
0–5
35–6
04–7
11–8
40–9
95–1
,157
–1,2
95–1
,335
–1,3
72–1
,399
–3,6
85–1
0,24
3R
efor
m a
nd
expa
nd
Per
kin
s lo
an p
rogr
am ��
����
������
–578
–1,5
64–1
,155
–896
–705
–547
–504
–494
–473
–448
–4,8
98–7
,364
Ove
rhau
l TE
AC
H G
ran
ts a
nd
repl
ace
wit
h
Pre
side
nti
al T
each
ing
Fel
low
s ����
������
������
������
������
210
215
015
615
013
81
–54
–67
–70
560
508
Est
abli
sh C
olle
ge C
ompl
etio
n I
nce
nti
ve
Gra
nts
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
242
220
288
300
291
9315
������
������
������
852
1,25
1A
ccel
erat
e th
e re
call
of
the
Per
kin
s L
oan
re
volv
ing
fun
d ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
���–3
84–6
18–7
27–7
64–1
13–1
97–2
594
202
342
–2,6
06–2
,190
Tot
al, E
duca
tion
�����
������
������
������
������
������
���–6
0–2
,544
415
–2,2
83–1
,696
–620
–323
–223
6045
41,
061
–6,7
28–5
,699
En
ergy
:R
epea
l ult
ra-d
eepw
ater
oil
an
d ga
s re
sear
ch
and
deve
lopm
ent
prog
ram
�����
������
������
������
�����
������
���–2
0–4
0–5
0–3
0–1
0���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
–150
–150
Pro
vide
Hom
eSta
r re
bate
s fo
r en
ergy
effi
cien
t h
ome
retr
ofits
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�30
01,
800
2,10
01,
020
600
180
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���5,
700
5,70
0T
otal
, En
ergy
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���30
01,
780
2,06
097
057
017
0���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
5,55
05,
550
44 MID-SESSION REVIEW44T
able
S–9
. M
AN
DA
TO
RY
AN
D R
EC
EIP
T P
RO
PO
SA
LS
FR
OM
T
HE
FE
BR
UA
RY
BU
DG
ET
—C
onti
nu
ed(D
efici
t in
crea
ses
(+)
or d
ecre
ases
(–)
in m
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
Hea
lth
an
d H
um
an S
ervi
ces:
Pro
vide
ph
ysic
ian
s re
lief
fro
m s
ust
ain
able
gr
owth
rat
e fo
rmu
la (
SG
R)
and
offs
et
cost
s: 10
Pro
vide
SG
R r
elie
f th
rou
gh 2
013
������
������
������
������
���18
,602
28,5
937,
210
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���54
,405
54,4
05O
ffse
t co
st o
f pr
ovid
ing
SG
R r
elie
f th
rou
gh
2013
wit
h s
peci
fic
hea
lth
sav
ings
3 ����
������
�����
������
–1,5
71–2
,175
–2,6
76–4
,759
–6,0
56–6
,846
–7,0
37–7
,275
–9,6
74–1
4,16
4–1
7,23
7–6
2,23
3P
rovi
de S
GR
rel
ief
from
201
4 on
war
d ���
������
����
������
������
������
������
23,2
0732
,072
34,6
9236
,730
39,8
5644
,760
49,9
0954
,222
89,9
7131
5,44
8O
ffse
t co
st o
f pr
ovid
ing
SG
R r
elie
f fr
om
2014
on
war
d ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
������
������
������
–23,
207
–32,
072
–34,
692
–36,
730
–39,
856
–44,
760
–49,
909
–54,
222
–89,
971
–315
,448
Sh
ift
futu
re U
nif
orm
ed S
ervi
ces
Fam
ily
Hea
lth
Pla
n e
nro
llee
s in
to T
RIC
AR
E-f
or-
LIF
E/M
edic
are:
Eff
ect
on M
edic
are
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
2030
5070
9012
015
050
530
Ref
orm
ch
ild
wel
fare
ass
ista
nce
to
impr
ove
perm
anen
cy a
nd
safe
ty ��
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
220
245
249
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
1,21
42,
464
Str
engt
hen
an
d ex
pan
d ch
ild
care
ass
ista
nce
����
������
381
632
730
749
750
750
750
750
750
750
3,24
26,
992
Ext
end
TA
NF
su
pple
men
tal g
ran
ts ��
������
������
���22
342
64���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���40
640
6M
oder
niz
e ch
ild
supp
ort
prog
ram
�����
������
������
������
������
244
310
251
269
303
356
362
252
226
226
1,37
72,
799
Ext
end
the
chil
d w
elfa
re s
tudy
�����
������
������
������
����
������
24
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
66
Ext
end
Tra
nsi
tion
al M
edic
al A
ssis
tan
ce
(TM
A) �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���24
041
510
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���66
566
5E
xten
d Q
ual
ified
In
divi
dual
s (Q
I) ��
������
������
�����
������
���49
5���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
495
495
Tot
al, H
ealt
h a
nd
Hu
man
Ser
vice
s ����
������
�����
2218
,955
28,0
885,
774
–3,4
71–4
,723
–5,4
40–5
,605
–5,9
33–8
,328
–12,
788
44,6
236,
529
Hou
sin
g an
d U
rban
Dev
elop
men
t:P
rovi
de f
un
din
g fo
r th
e A
ffor
dabl
e H
ousi
ng
Tru
st F
un
d ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
1014
029
023
019
010
020
20���
������
������
���86
01,
000
Inte
rior
:Im
pose
fee
on
non
prod
uci
ng
oil a
nd
gas
leas
es
������
���–2
5–3
9–5
9–7
5–9
0–9
8–1
09–1
16–1
25–1
38–2
88–8
74R
eser
ve f
un
ds f
or in
sula
r af
fair
s as
sist
ance
����
������
���25
2424
2422
1615
1412
1111
918
7R
etu
rn t
o n
et r
ecei
pts
shar
ing
for
ener
gy
min
eral
s ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
������
������
–44
–45
–47
–47
–48
–50
–53
–52
–55
–183
–441
Ref
orm
coa
l an
d h
ardr
ock
Aba
ndo
ned
Min
e L
ands
(A
ML
) pr
ogra
ms2 �
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–1
38–3
86–3
30–2
04–1
29–8
1–1
28–1
45–1
00–8
9–1
,187
–1,7
30Im
pose
har
droc
k m
inin
g ro
yalt
y ���
������
������
������
����
������
������
���–7
–5–6
–6–7
–10
–15
–19
–25
–24
–100
Rep
eal E
ner
gy P
olic
y A
ct f
ee p
roh
ibit
ion
an
d m
anda
tory
per
mit
fu
nds
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
������
���–2
0–1
9–1
8���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–5
7–5
7In
crea
se D
uck
Sta
mp
fees
2 ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
–4���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
–4–4
Rea
thor
ize
Fed
eral
Lan
d S
ales
/Acq
uis
itio
n
Law
(F
LTF
A) �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–3
–5–8
–10
–4���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
–30
–30
45SUMMARY TABLES 45T
able
S–9
. M
AN
DA
TO
RY
AN
D R
EC
EIP
T P
RO
PO
SA
LS
FR
OM
T
HE
FE
BR
UA
RY
BU
DG
ET
—C
onti
nu
ed(D
efici
t in
crea
ses
(+)
or d
ecre
ases
(–)
in m
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
Rep
eal G
eoth
erm
al P
aym
ents
to
Cou
nti
es
un
der
2005
En
ergy
Pol
icy
Act
�����
������
������
�����
������
���–7
–7–7
–7–7
–7–8
–8–8
–8–3
5–7
4R
epea
l “de
ep g
as”
roya
lty
ince
nti
ves �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
Tot
al, I
nte
rior
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
–152
–484
–449
–343
–261
–225
–290
–323
–292
–304
–1,6
89–3
,123
Just
ice:
Pro
vide
ince
nti
ves
for
Sta
te m
edic
al
mal
prac
tice
ref
orm
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
���10
050
5050
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
250
250
Lab
or:
Giv
e S
tate
s an
d em
ploy
ers
shor
t-te
rm
reli
ef f
rom
inte
rest
an
d ta
x in
crea
ses
and
stre
ngt
hen
un
empl
oym
ent
insu
ran
ce
syst
em s
olve
ncy
2 ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
���1,
220
3,54
44,
051
–7,4
77–1
2,86
3–1
0,54
4–1
1,81
3–8
,555
3426
3–1
67–2
3,28
9–4
3,52
7R
efor
m F
eder
al E
mpl
oyee
s’ C
ompe
nsa
tion
A
ct (
FE
CA
) ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–1
0–1
3–5
–7–1
7–2
6–3
6–4
6–5
6–6
7–5
2–2
83R
eau
thor
ize
Tra
de A
dju
stm
ent
Ass
ista
nce
�����
124
415
713
893
825
746
708
696
710
736
778
3,59
27,
220
Pro
tect
pen
sion
ben
efits
by
empo
wer
ing
the
PB
GC
Boa
rd t
o im
prov
e so
lven
cy ��
������
������
�����
������
������
������
������
–1,1
21–2
,523
–2,2
86–2
,141
–2,0
46–1
,987
–1,9
66–2
,001
–5,9
30–1
6,07
1E
xpan
d F
orei
gn L
abor
Cer
tifi
cati
on F
ees �
������
����
������
–44
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–4
4–4
4E
xpan
d w
ork-
shar
ing
prog
ram
2 ����
������
������
������
����
������
3617
–561
9089
8888
8889
199
641
En
han
ce u
nem
ploy
men
t in
sura
nce
pro
gram
in
tegr
ity2,
4 ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
������
���–1
42–2
61–2
2243
8–3
1619
521
9–1
37–3
30–1
87–5
56T
otal
, Lab
or ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��1,
344
3,94
14,
626
–7,9
76–1
4,72
9–1
1,57
3–1
3,49
9–9
,658
–982
–1,0
72–1
,698
–25,
711
–52,
620
Tre
asu
ry:
Lev
y pa
ymen
ts t
o M
edic
are
prov
ider
s w
ith
de
lin
quen
t ta
x de
bt2 �
������
������
������
������
������
������
�–1
7–6
4–6
8–7
1–7
4–7
6–7
6–7
8–8
0–8
0–8
1–3
53–7
48O
ffse
t F
eder
al t
ax r
efu
nds
to
coll
ect
Sta
te
inco
me
taxe
s fr
om d
ebto
rs w
ho
curr
entl
y re
side
in o
ther
Sta
tes �
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���L
evy
paym
ents
to
Fed
eral
con
trac
tors
wit
h
deli
nqu
ent
tax
debt
2 ����
������
������
������
������
������
����
–5–5
9–6
1–6
4–6
7–6
9–7
3–7
6–8
0–8
3–8
7–3
20–7
19R
estr
uct
ure
ass
ista
nce
to
New
Yor
k C
ity2 �
������
������
���20
020
020
020
020
020
020
020
020
020
01,
000
2,00
0T
otal
, Tre
asu
ry ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–2
277
7165
5955
5146
4037
3232
753
3
Vet
eran
s A
ffai
rs:
Ext
end
vete
ran
s in
com
e ve
rifi
cati
on ���
������
������
����
������
26–7
–13
–20
–27
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–4
1–4
1E
xten
d V
BA
au
thor
ity
for
use
of
HH
S d
ata
����
������
���4
21
������
���–1
–2–3
–4–5
–56
–13
Ref
orm
cri
teri
a fo
r sp
ecia
l mon
thly
pen
sion
���
������
���–6
–10
–13
–16
–20
–23
–27
–30
–34
–37
–65
–216
Pro
vide
au
thor
ity
for
ven
dee
loan
poo
lin
g ����
������
������
–86
–93
1���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
–178
–178
Exp
and
elig
ibil
ity
for
Voc
atio
nal
R
ehab
ilit
atio
n a
nd
Em
ploy
men
t on
-th
e-jo
b tr
ain
ing
prog
ram
5 ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
46 MID-SESSION REVIEW46T
able
S–9
. M
AN
DA
TO
RY
AN
D R
EC
EIP
T P
RO
PO
SA
LS
FR
OM
T
HE
FE
BR
UA
RY
BU
DG
ET
—C
onti
nu
ed(D
efici
t in
crea
ses
(+)
or d
ecre
ases
(–)
in m
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
All
ow o
ccu
pan
cy b
y a
depe
nde
nt
chil
d to
sat
isfy
VA
hom
e lo
ans
occu
pan
cy
requ
irem
ent �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
������
���1
11
11
11
11
49
Tot
al, V
eter
ans
Aff
airs
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–6
2–1
07–2
3–3
5–4
7–2
4–2
9–3
3–3
8–4
1–2
74–4
39
Cor
ps o
f E
ngi
nee
rs:
Ref
orm
inla
nd
wat
erw
ays
fun
din
g2 ����
������
������
�����
������
������
���–1
96–1
63–1
35–7
2–7
2–7
1–6
9–7
0–6
9–5
66–9
17
En
viro
nm
enta
l Pro
tect
ion
Age
ncy
:E
nac
t pe
stic
ide
regi
stra
tion
an
d pr
eman
ufa
ctu
re n
otic
e fe
es ��
������
������
������
������
������
���–4
9–8
1–8
8–9
5–9
7–1
01–1
04–1
07–1
10–1
14–4
10–9
46E
stab
lish
fee
s fo
r u
se o
f h
azar
dou
s w
aste
el
ectr
onic
man
ifes
t sy
stem
�����
������
������
������
����
������
������
������
������
���–6
–4–3
–3–3
–3–3
–3–1
3–2
8T
otal
, En
viro
nm
enta
l Pro
tect
ion
Age
ncy
�����
����
������
–49
–81
–94
–99
–100
–104
–107
–110
–113
–117
–423
–974
Soc
ial S
ecu
rity
Adm
inis
trat
ion
:R
equ
ire
wor
kers
’ com
pen
sati
on in
form
atio
n
repo
rtin
g4 ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
55
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
1010
Tem
pora
rily
ext
end
SS
I be
nefi
ts f
or r
efu
gees
����
������
8692
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
178
178
Req
uir
e S
tate
s an
d lo
cali
ties
to
prov
ide
pen
sion
info
rmat
ion
4 ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
1320
18–2
02–4
39–5
74–6
09–5
55–5
22–4
79–5
90–3
,329
Rev
ert
to q
uar
terl
y w
age
repo
rtin
g4 ����
������
������
������
���20
3010
0���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
150
150
En
act
DI
Wor
k In
cen
tive
s S
impl
ifica
tion
Pil
ot
(non
-PA
YG
O) �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���5
1015
2225
13���
������
������
������
������
������
���77
90T
otal
, Soc
ial S
ecu
rity
Adm
inis
trat
ion
�����
������
������
���12
915
713
3–1
80–4
14–5
61–6
09–5
55–5
22–4
79–1
75–2
,901
Oth
er I
nde
pen
den
t A
gen
cies
:P
rovi
de fi
nan
cial
rel
ief
to t
he
U�S
� Pos
tal
Ser
vice
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
2,27
127
924
932
129
928
022
922
922
922
922
91,
428
2,57
3
Fed
eral
Com
mu
nic
atio
ns
Com
mis
sion
(F
CC
):E
nac
t sp
ectr
um
lice
nse
use
r fe
e ����
������
������
����
–50
–200
–300
–425
–550
–550
–550
–550
–550
–550
–550
–2,0
25–4
,775
Pro
vide
no
new
fu
ndi
ng
for
the
Tel
ecom
mu
nic
atio
ns
Dev
elop
men
t F
un
d��
–3–7
–7–7
–7–7
–7–7
–7–7
–7–3
5–7
0S
ubt
otal
, Fed
eral
Com
mu
nic
atio
ns
Com
mis
sion
(F
CC
) ����
������
������
������
������
��–5
3–2
07–3
07–4
32–5
57–5
57–5
57–5
57–5
57–5
57–5
57–2
,060
–4,8
45T
otal
, oth
er in
depe
nde
nt
agen
cies
�����
������
�����
2,21
872
–58
–111
–258
–277
–328
–328
–328
–328
–328
–632
–2,2
72
Mu
lti-
Age
ncy
:
En
act
Wir
eles
s In
nov
atio
n a
nd
Infr
astr
uct
ure
In
itia
tive
(W
I3):
En
act
ince
nti
ve a
uct
ion
au
thor
ity
and
oth
er
spec
tru
m r
efor
ms �
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
–1,9
00–6
,020
–8,2
40–6
,430
–2,4
60–4
00–1
,300
–1,0
50���
������
������
���–2
5,05
0–2
7,80
0B
uil
d a
Pu
blic
Saf
ety
Bro
adba
nd
Net
wor
k ��
������
���1,
400
1,40
01,
400
1,40
01,
400
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���7,
000
7,00
0R
eser
ve t
he
D B
lock
for
pu
blic
saf
ety
use
����
������
���3,
150
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���3,
150
3,15
0
47SUMMARY TABLES 47T
able
S–9
. M
AN
DA
TO
RY
AN
D R
EC
EIP
T P
RO
PO
SA
LS
FR
OM
T
HE
FE
BR
UA
RY
BU
DG
ET
—C
onti
nu
ed(D
efici
t in
crea
ses
(+)
or d
ecre
ases
(–)
in m
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
Ext
end
wir
eles
s br
oadb
and
thro
ugh
th
e N
atio
nal
Wir
eles
s In
itia
tive
an
d su
ppor
t U
niv
ersa
l Ser
vice
Fu
nd
refo
rm ��
������
������
������
������
2,50
01,
250
1,25
0���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
5,00
05,
000
Cre
ate
a W
irel
ess
Inn
ovat
ion
Fu
nd
������
������
�����
������
409
587
681
627
539
123
34���
������
������
������
������
2,84
33,
000
Tot
al, e
nac
t W
irel
ess
Inn
ovat
ion
an
d In
fras
tru
ctu
re I
nit
iati
ve (
WI3
) ����
������
������
���5,
559
–2,7
83–4
,909
–4,4
03–5
21–2
77–1
,266
–1,0
50���
������
������
���–7
,057
–9,6
50Im
plem
ent
prog
ram
inte
grit
y al
loca
tion
ad
just
men
ts 2,
11 �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
–1,4
97–4
,187
–6,6
84–9
,465
–12,
620
–14,
990
–16,
632
–18,
305
–19,
647
–20,
976
–34,
453
–125
,003
Pro
vide
$25
0 E
con
omic
Rec
over
y P
aym
ents
2 ��
14,6
1626
5���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
265
265
Hol
d h
arm
less
th
e F
eder
al p
over
ty le
vel �
������
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
Tot
al, m
ult
i-ag
ency
�����
������
������
������
������
������
�����
14,6
164,
327
–6,9
70–1
1,59
3–1
3,86
8–1
3,14
1–1
5,26
7–1
7,89
8–1
9,35
5–1
9,64
7–2
0,97
6–4
1,24
5–1
34,3
88
Tot
al, m
and
ator
y an
d r
ecei
pt
pro
pos
als,
in
clu
din
g su
rfac
e tr
ansp
orta
tion
.....
......
18,9
3014
,227
5,67
1–2
,579
–83,
764–
121,
100
–76,
118
–71,
523
–58,
081
–73,
693
–76,
882–
187,
545–
543,
842
Not
e: F
or r
ecei
pt e
ffec
ts, p
osit
ive
figu
res
indi
cate
low
er r
ecei
pts�
For
ou
tlay
eff
ects
, pos
itiv
e fi
gure
s in
dica
te h
igh
er o
utl
ays�
For
net
cos
ts, p
osit
ive
figu
res
indi
cate
h
igh
er d
efici
ts�
1 T
he
esti
mat
es f
or t
his
pro
posa
l in
clu
de e
ffec
ts o
n o
utl
ays�
Th
e ou
tlay
eff
ects
incl
ude
d in
th
e to
tals
abo
ve a
re li
sted
bel
ow:
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
Con
tin
ue
cert
ain
exp
irin
g pr
ovis
ion
s th
rou
gh
cale
nda
r ye
ar 2
012
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���32
502
789
437
384
121
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���2,
233
2,23
3E
xpan
d ea
rned
inco
me
tax
cred
it���
������
������
������
�����
������
������
������
691,
372
1,38
41,
404
1,43
61,
463
1,49
01,
512
1,55
14,
229
11,6
81E
xpan
d ch
ild
and
depe
nde
nt
care
tax
cre
dit �
������
����
������
������
���33
734
735
436
337
238
639
841
042
01,
401
3,38
7P
rovi
de f
or a
uto
mat
ic e
nro
llm
ent
in I
RA
s an
d do
ubl
e th
e ta
x cr
edit
for
sm
all e
mpl
oyer
pla
n
star
tup
cost
s ����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���38
6671
7990
105
122
142
167
254
880
Ext
end
Am
eric
an o
ppor
tun
ity
tax
cred
it ��
������
������
������
������
������
164,
465
4,42
54,
655
4,60
84,
531
4,79
14,
775
5,03
813
,561
37,3
04R
efor
m a
nd
exte
nd
Bu
ild
Am
eric
a bo
nds
�����
������
��10
559
91,
580
2,79
34,
048
5,31
46,
575
7,83
09,
080
10,3
2411
,561
14,3
3459
,704
Des
ign
ate
Gro
wth
Zon
es���
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
1434
4343
4010
–20
–20
–17
–14
174
113
Tot
al o
utl
ay e
ffec
ts o
f re
ceip
t pr
opos
als �
������
����
137
1,11
52,
863
9,52
310
,709
11,9
7613
,091
14,2
9515
,861
17,1
4618
,723
36,1
8611
5,30
22 T
he
esti
mat
es f
or t
his
pro
posa
l in
clu
de e
ffec
ts o
n r
ecei
pts�
Th
e re
ceip
t ef
fect
s in
clu
ded
in t
he
tota
ls a
bove
are
list
ed b
elow
:
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
Ref
orm
inla
nd
wat
erw
ays
fun
din
g ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–1
96–1
63–1
35–7
2–7
2–7
1–6
9–7
0–6
9–5
66–9
17R
efor
m c
oal a
nd
har
droc
k A
ban
don
ed M
ine
Lan
ds (
AM
L)
prog
ram
s ���
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
������
������
–200
–200
–200
–200
–200
–200
–200
–200
–200
–800
–1,8
00In
crea
se D
uck
Sta
mp
fees
�����
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
–14
–14
–14
–14
–14
–14
–14
–14
–14
–14
–70
–140
Giv
e S
tate
s an
d em
ploy
ers
shor
t-te
rm r
elie
f fro
m
inte
rest
an
d ta
x in
crea
ses
and
stre
ngt
hen
u
nem
ploy
men
t in
sura
nce
sys
tem
sol
ven
cy ��
����
������
���1,
714
3,54
1–7
,477
–12,
863
–10,
544
–11,
814
–8,5
5534
263
–167
–25,
629
–45,
868
Exp
and
wor
k-sh
arin
g pr
ogra
m ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–1
4–2
051
8282
8181
8181
9950
5
48 MID-SESSION REVIEW48T
able
S–9
. M
AN
DA
TO
RY
AN
D R
EC
EIP
T P
RO
PO
SA
LS
FR
OM
T
HE
FE
BR
UA
RY
BU
DG
ET
—C
onti
nu
ed(D
efici
t in
crea
ses
(+)
or d
ecre
ases
(–)
in m
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
En
han
ce u
nem
ploy
men
t in
sura
nce
inte
grit
y ���
����
������
������
������
–54
–108
–70
588
–162
355
388
42–1
4435
683
5L
evy
paym
ents
to
Med
icar
e pr
ovid
ers
wit
h
deli
nqu
ent
tax
debt
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–1
7–6
4–6
8–7
1–7
4–7
6–7
6–7
8–8
0–8
0–8
1–3
53–7
48L
evy
paym
ents
to
Fed
eral
con
trac
tors
wit
h
deli
nqu
ent
tax
debt
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–5
–59
–61
–64
–67
–69
–73
–76
–80
–83
–87
–320
–719
Res
tru
ctu
re a
ssis
tan
ce t
o N
ew Y
ork
Cit
y ���
������
����
������
���20
020
020
020
020
020
020
020
020
020
01,
000
2,00
0Im
plem
ent
prog
ram
inte
grit
y al
loca
tion
ad
just
men
ts ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–2
76–8
04–1
,970
–3,7
21–5
,646
–7,2
27–8
,184
–8,7
73–9
,274
–9,7
78–1
2,41
7–5
5,65
3P
rovi
de $
250
Eco
nom
ic R
ecov
ery
Pay
men
ts ��
������
216
112
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���11
211
2T
otal
rec
eipt
eff
ects
of
man
dato
ry p
ropo
sals
���
194
1,61
32,
330
–9,8
87–1
6,89
3–1
5,75
1–1
9,35
6–1
6,54
2–8
,513
–9,1
35–1
0,25
9–3
8,58
8–1
02,3
933
Th
e h
ealt
h s
avin
gs t
o of
fset
th
e co
st o
f pro
vidi
ng
phys
icia
ns
two
year
s of
rel
ief f
rom
sch
edu
led
paym
ent
cuts
un
der
the
sust
ain
able
gro
wth
rat
e fo
rmu
la (S
GR
) are
li
sted
bel
ow:
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
Exp
and
CM
S p
rogr
am in
tegr
ity
auth
orit
y:R
edu
ce M
edic
aid
prov
ider
tax
th
resh
old
begi
nn
ing
in 2
015 �
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
–1,4
60–2
,050
–2,6
90–2
,820
–2,9
70–3
,110
–3,2
70–3
,510
–18,
370
Str
engt
hen
Med
icai
d th
ird-
part
y li
abil
ity
������
����
������
–65
–95
–155
–165
–170
–175
–190
–195
–200
–210
–650
–1,6
20T
rack
hig
h p
resc
ribe
rs a
nd
uti
lize
rs o
f pr
escr
ipti
on d
rugs
in M
edic
aid
������
������
������
�����
������
–80
–170
–310
–340
–370
–390
–410
–440
–460
–480
–1,2
70–3
,450
Req
uir
e m
anu
fact
ure
rs t
hat
impr
oper
ly
repo
rt it
ems
for
Med
icai
d dr
ug
cove
rage
to
full
y re
pay
Sta
tes �
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
���–1
0–1
0–1
0–1
0–1
0–1
5–1
5–1
5–1
5–1
5–5
0–1
25E
nfo
rce
Med
icai
d dr
ug
reba
te a
gree
men
ts ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
Incr
ease
pen
alti
es o
n d
rug
man
ufa
ctu
rers
for
fr
audu
len
t n
on-c
ompl
ian
ce w
ith
Med
icai
d dr
ug
reba
te a
gree
men
ts ���
������
������
������
������
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���R
equ
ire
dru
gs t
o be
pro
perl
y li
sted
wit
h t
he
FD
A t
o re
ceiv
e M
edic
aid
cove
rage
�����
������
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���P
roh
ibit
Fed
eral
fu
nds
fro
m b
ein
g u
sed
as M
edic
aid/
CH
IP S
tate
sh
are
un
less
sp
ecifi
call
y au
thor
ized
by
law
�����
������
������
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���R
ecov
er e
rron
eou
s pa
ymen
ts m
ade
to
insu
rers
par
tici
pati
ng
in M
edic
are
Adv
anta
ge ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
–490
–570
–600
–640
–650
–680
–680
–660
–610
–580
–2,9
50–6
,160
Incr
ease
scr
uti
ny
of p
rovi
ders
usi
ng
hig
her
-ri
sk b
anki
ng
arra
nge
men
ts t
o re
ceiv
e M
edic
are
paym
ents
�����
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���A
llow
civ
il m
onet
ary
pen
alti
es f
or p
rovi
ders
w
ho
do n
ot u
pdat
e en
roll
men
t in
form
atio
n �
������
������
������
������
���–1
0–1
0–1
0–1
0–1
0–1
0–1
0–1
0–3
0–8
0S
tudy
th
e fe
asib
ilit
y of
usi
ng
un
iver
sal
prod
uct
nu
mbe
rs (
UP
Ns)
to
impr
ove
paym
ent
accu
racy
in M
edic
are �
������
������
������
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
49SUMMARY TABLES 49T
able
S–9
. M
AN
DA
TO
RY
AN
D R
EC
EIP
T P
RO
PO
SA
LS
FR
OM
T
HE
FE
BR
UA
RY
BU
DG
ET
—C
onti
nu
ed(D
efici
t in
crea
ses
(+)
or d
ecre
ases
(–)
in m
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
Per
mit
exc
lusi
on o
f in
divi
dual
s af
fili
ated
wit
h
enti
ties
san
ctio
ned
for
fra
udu
len
t or
oth
er
proh
ibit
ed a
ctio
ns
from
fed
eral
hea
lth
car
e pr
ogra
ms �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–1
0–1
0–1
0–1
0–1
0���
������
–50
Cre
ate
a sy
stem
to
vali
date
ph
ysic
ian
s’ a
nd
prac
titi
oner
s’ o
rder
s fo
r ce
rtai
n h
igh
-ris
k pr
odu
cts
and
serv
ices
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–2
0–1
10–2
00–2
50–2
60–2
80–3
10–3
30–3
30–1
,760
Req
uir
e pr
epay
men
t re
view
for
all
pow
er
wh
eelc
hai
rs���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
–10
–20
–20
–20
–20
–30
–30
–30
–30
–30
–90
–240
Use
a p
orti
on o
f R
ecov
ery
Au
dit
Con
trac
tor
reco
veri
es t
o im
plem
ent
acti
ons
that
pr
even
t im
prop
er p
aym
ents
an
d fr
aud
������
�����
������
������
������
������
������
���–2
0–3
0–3
0–3
0–4
0–4
0–4
0–8
0–2
30P
rovi
de fl
exib
ilit
y to
th
e S
ecre
tary
in
impl
emen
tin
g pr
edic
tive
an
alyt
ics
tech
nol
ogie
s fo
r cl
aim
s pa
ymen
t to
m
axim
ize
cost
eff
ecti
ven
ess �
������
������
������
������
����
������
������
���–2
0–2
0–2
0–3
0–1
0���
������
������
������
������
������
���–1
00–1
00L
imit
th
e di
sch
arge
of
debt
in b
ankr
upt
cy
proc
eedi
ngs
in c
ases
of
frau
dule
nt
acti
vity
����
������
������
������
������
–10
–10
–20
–20
–20
–20
–20
–30
–40
–150
Str
engt
hen
pen
alti
es f
or il
lega
l dis
trib
uti
on
of M
edic
are,
Med
icai
d, o
r C
HIP
ben
efici
ary
iden
tifi
cati
on o
r bi
llin
g pr
ivil
eges
�����
������
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���
Tot
al, e
xpan
d C
MS
pro
gram
inte
grit
y au
thor
ity �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
���–6
55–8
85–1
,155
–2,8
05–3
,560
–4,3
10–4
,475
–4,6
70–4
,815
–5,0
05–9
,060
–32,
335
Oth
er M
edic
aid
Pro
posa
ls:
Lim
it M
edic
aid
reim
burs
emen
t of
du
rabl
e m
edic
al e
quip
men
t (D
ME
) ba
sed
on
Med
icar
e ra
tes �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
���–2
10–4
20–4
70–5
50–7
00–7
30–7
70–8
10–8
50–8
90–2
,350
–6,4
00R
ebas
e M
edic
aid
Dis
prop
orti
onat
e S
har
e H
ospi
tal (
DS
H)
allo
tmen
ts in
202
1 ����
������
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
–4,1
70���
������
–4,1
70T
otal
, oth
er M
edic
aid
prop
osal
s ���
������
������
�����
������
���–2
10–4
20–4
70–5
50–7
00–7
30–7
70–8
10–8
50–5
,060
–2,3
50–1
0,57
0
Oth
er M
edic
are
Pro
posa
ls:
Req
uir
e th
e S
ecre
tary
to
dete
rmin
e th
e ge
ogra
phic
sco
pe o
f Q
ual
ity
Impr
ovem
ent
Org
aniz
atio
n (
QIO
) co
ntr
acts
to
max
imiz
e ef
fici
ency
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
–20
–50
–110
–190
–230
–260
–290
–320
–360
–390
–600
–2,2
20E
lim
inat
e th
e co
nfl
ict
of in
tere
st b
etw
een
be
nefi
ciar
y pr
otec
tion
an
d qu
alit
y im
prov
emen
t ac
tivi
ties
for
QIO
s ����
������
������
�����
������
–10
–20
–30
–60
–80
–80
–90
–100
–120
–120
–200
–710
Exp
and
pool
of
con
trac
tors
eli
gibl
e fo
r Q
IO
wor
k ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–1
0–2
0–2
0–2
0–3
0–2
0–2
0–3
0–5
0–1
70E
xten
d th
e Q
IO c
ontr
act
len
gth
fro
m t
hre
e ye
ars
up
to fi
ve y
ears
�����
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
������
������
������
������
���–1
0–2
0–2
0–2
0–3
0–3
0–3
0–3
0–1
60A
lign
QIO
con
trac
t te
rmin
atio
ns
wit
h F
eder
al
Acq
uis
itio
n R
egu
lati
ons �
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
50 MID-SESSION REVIEW50T
able
S–9
. M
AN
DA
TO
RY
AN
D R
EC
EIP
T P
RO
PO
SA
LS
FR
OM
T
HE
FE
BR
UA
RY
BU
DG
ET
—C
onti
nu
ed(D
efici
t in
crea
ses
(+)
or d
ecre
ases
(–)
in m
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Tot
als
2012
–20
1620
12–
2021
Ded
icat
e E
HR
pen
alti
es t
o im
prov
ing
Med
icar
e pr
ogra
m fi
nan
cin
g ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
–1,6
20–1
,610
������
���–3
,230
Tot
al, o
ther
Med
icar
e pr
opos
als �
������
������
������
����
������
–30
–70
–150
–280
–350
–380
–430
–470
–2,1
50–2
,180
–880
–6,4
90
Oth
er P
har
mac
euti
cal P
ropo
sals
:M
odif
y le
ngt
h o
f ex
clu
sivi
ty t
o fa
cili
tate
fas
ter
deve
lopm
ent
of g
ener
ic b
iolo
gics
�����
������
������
����
������
������
������
������
������
���–8
0–2
50–3
00–3
40–4
20–4
60–4
90–3
30–2
,340
Pro
hib
it b
ran
d an
d ge
ner
ic d
rug
com
pan
ies
from
del
ayin
g th
e av
aila
bili
ty o
f n
ew
gen
eric
dru
gs ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
������
���–5
40–5
90–6
80–7
60–8
50–9
10–9
60–1
,070
–1,1
80–1
,250
–3,4
20–8
,790
Str
eam
lin
e ph
arm
acy
ben
efit
con
trac
tin
g in
th
e F
EH
B p
rogr
am ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
–69
–138
–147
–160
–171
–184
–200
–216
–231
–251
–685
–1,7
67T
otal
, oth
er p
har
mac
euti
cal p
ropo
sals
������
����
������
���–6
09–7
28–8
27–1
,000
–1,2
71–1
,394
–1,5
00–1
,706
–1,8
71–1
,991
–4,4
35–1
2,89
7In
tera
ctio
ns
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–6
7–7
2–7
4–1
24–1
75–3
213
838
112
72–5
1259
Tot
al s
avin
gs f
rom
CM
S p
rogr
am
inte
grit
y, a
nd
oth
er M
edic
are,
M
edic
aid
, an
d p
har
mac
euti
cal
pro
pos
als
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
...–1
,571
–2,1
75–2
,676
–4,7
59–6
,056
–6,8
46–7
,037
–7,2
75–9
,674
–14,
164
–17,
237
–62,
233
Cos
t of
pro
vidi
ng
SG
R r
elie
f th
rou
gh 2
013�
�����
������
���18
,602
28,5
937,
210
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���54
,405
54,4
05
Add
itio
nal
sav
ings
aft
er p
ayin
g fo
r S
GR
rel
ief
thro
ugh
201
3 ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
������
���17
,031
26,4
184,
534
–4,7
59–6
,056
–6,8
46–7
,037
–7,2
75–9
,674
–14,
164
37,1
68–7
,828
4 T
his
pro
posa
l has
bot
h P
AY
GO
an
d n
on-P
AY
GO
eff
ects
�5 T
his
pro
posa
l has
ou
tlay
s of
less
th
an $
500,
000
per
year
� Th
e to
tal c
ost
is $
1 m
illi
on f
rom
201
2–20
16 a
nd
$3 m
illi
on f
rom
201
2–20
21�
6 T
his
pro
posa
l was
en
acte
d in
th
e C
ompr
ehen
sive
109
9 T
axpa
yer
Pro
tect
ion
an
d R
epay
men
t of
Exc
han
ge S
ubs
idy
Ove
rpay
men
ts A
ct o
f 20
11 (
P�L
� 112
–9)�
7 P
orti
ons
of t
his
pro
posa
l w
ere
enac
ted
in t
he
Dep
artm
ent
of D
efen
se a
nd
Fu
ll-Y
ear
Con
tin
uin
g A
ppro
pria
tion
s A
ct (
P�L
� 112
–10)
an
d th
e B
udg
et C
ontr
ol A
ct o
f 20
11 (
P�L
� 112
–25)
�8 T
his
pro
posa
l was
en
acte
d in
th
e B
udg
et C
ontr
ol A
ct o
f 20
11 (
P�L
� 112
–25)
�9 T
his
pro
posa
l was
en
acte
d in
th
e D
epar
tmen
t of
Def
ense
an
d F
ull
-Yea
r C
onti
nu
ing
App
ropr
iati
ons
Act
(P�
L� 1
12–1
0)�
10 T
he
prop
osal
to
prov
ide
perm
anen
t S
GR
rel
ief i
s pr
esen
ted
in t
he
adju
sted
bas
elin
e fo
r th
e M
id-S
essi
on R
evie
w�
Th
e A
dmin
istr
atio
n is
com
mit
ted
to w
orki
ng
wit
h
the
Con
gres
s to
ach
ieve
fisc
ally
res
pon
sibl
e S
GR
ref
orm
in t
he
con
text
of
the
Adm
inis
trat
ion
’s d
efici
t re
duct
ion
pro
posa
ls�
11 T
he
port
ion
s of
th
e pr
opos
al t
hat
aff
ect
SS
A a
nd
CM
S w
ere
enac
ted
in t
he
Bu
dget
Con
trol
Act
of
2011
(P�
L� 1
12–2
5)�
51SUMMARY TABLES 51T
able
S–1
0.
OU
TL
AY
S F
OR
MA
ND
AT
OR
Y P
RO
GR
AM
S U
ND
ER
CU
RR
EN
T L
AW
1,2
(In
bil
lion
s of
dol
lars
)
2010
Act
ual
Est
imat
e
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Hu
man
res
ourc
es p
rogr
ams:
Edu
cati
on, t
rain
ing,
em
ploy
men
t an
d so
cial
ser
vice
s ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���–7
–13
710
22
5H
ealt
h �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�30
431
430
732
341
748
453
7M
edic
are
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
446
484
466
503
531
556
605
Inco
me
secu
rity
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�55
353
648
046
743
243
544
7S
ocia
l Sec
uri
ty ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
701
726
768
813
859
908
960
Vet
eran
s’ b
enefi
ts a
nd
serv
ices
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
5775
6977
8389
101
Su
btot
al, h
um
an r
esou
rces
pro
gram
s ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
2,05
42,
120
2,09
82,
193
2,32
42,
474
2,65
5
Oth
er m
anda
tory
pro
gram
s:N
atio
nal
def
ense
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
58
87
77
7In
tern
atio
nal
aff
airs
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
-*–3
–3–1
–1–1
–1E
ner
gy �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
1–1
32
31
–1A
gric
ult
ure
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��15
1411
1815
1514
Com
mer
ce a
nd
hou
sin
g cr
edit
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��–8
9–1
024
–22
–28
–22
–15
Tra
nsp
orta
tion
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��2
23
32
22
Com
mu
nit
y an
d re
gion
al d
evel
opm
ent
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
1–2
11
-*-*
-*Ju
stic
e ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
23
76
54
5G
ener
al g
over
nm
ent
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
49
85
55
5U
ndi
stri
bute
d of
fset
tin
g re
ceip
ts �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
–82
–87
–98
–94
–97
–101
–102
Oth
er f
un
ctio
ns
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
12
34
43
4S
ubt
otal
, oth
er m
anda
tory
pro
gram
s ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
–141
–64
–32
–71
–85
–87
–82
Tot
al, o
utl
ays
for
man
dato
ry p
rogr
ams
un
der
curr
ent
law
����
������
������
������
������
������
��1,
913
2,05
62,
066
2,12
22,
239
2,38
72,
573
*$50
0 m
illi
on o
r le
ss�
1 T
his
tab
le m
eets
th
e re
quir
emen
ts o
f S
ecti
on 2
21(b
) of
th
e L
egis
lati
ve R
eorg
aniz
atio
n A
ct o
f 19
70�
2 E
stim
ates
are
bas
ed o
n t
he
Bu
dget
En
forc
emen
t A
ct (
BE
A)
base
lin
e�
Th
e B
EA
bas
elin
e di
ffer
s in
som
e in
stan
ces
from
cu
rren
t la
w (
see
the
chap
ter
on “
Cu
rren
t S
ervi
ces
Est
imat
es”
in t
he
An
alyt
ical
Per
spec
tive
s vo
lum
e of
th
e 20
12 B
udg
et)
and
also
fro
m t
he
adju
sted
bas
elin
e (s
ee T
able
S–7
)�
52 MID-SESSION REVIEW52T
able
S–1
1.
FU
ND
ING
LE
VE
LS
FO
R A
PP
RO
PR
IAT
ED
(“
DIS
CR
ET
ION
AR
Y”)
PR
OG
RA
MS
BY
CA
TE
GO
RY
(Bu
dget
au
thor
ity
in b
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs)
2010
Act
ual
2011
En
acte
d
Dis
cret
ion
ary
Cap
s E
nac
ted
in t
he
Bu
dget
Con
trol
Act
of
2011
Tot
als
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2012
- 20
1620
12-
2021
Dis
cret
ion
ary
Cat
egor
ies:
1
Sec
uri
ty C
ateg
ory
������
������
������
������
������
������
��68
4�4
688�
168
4�0
686�
069
8�0
711�
072
5�0
741�
075
7�0
774�
079
1�0
808�
03,
504�
07,
375�
0N
on-S
ecu
rity
Cat
egor
y ��
������
������
������
������
���40
0�4
371�
035
9�0
361�
036
8�0
375�
038
2�0
390�
039
9�0
408�
041
7�0
426�
01,
845�
03,
885�
0
Su
bto
tal,
Dis
cret
ion
ary
Cat
egor
y ...
......
.1,
084.
81,
059.
11,
043.
01,
047.
01,
066.
01,
086.
01,
107.
01,
131.
01,
156.
01,
182.
01,
208.
01,
234.
05,
349.
011
,260
.0
Cap
Ad
just
men
ts: 2
Ove
rsea
s C
onti
nge
ncy
Ope
rati
ons 3
�����
�����
162�
615
9�4
126�
550
�050
�050
�050
�050
�050
�050
�050
�050
�032
6�5
576�
5P
rogr
am I
nte
grit
y A
dju
stm
ents
4 ��
������
������
0�5
0�5
0�9
1�1
1�3
1�5
1�6
1�7
1�7
1�8
1�8
1�8
6�2
15�1
Su
bto
tal,
Cap
Ad
just
men
ts .
......
......
......
...16
3.1
159.
912
7.4
51.1
51.3
51.5
51.6
51.7
51.7
51.8
51.8
51.8
332.
859
1.6
Oth
er 2
010
and
2011
Su
pple
men
tal/
Em
erge
ncy
Dis
cret
ion
ary
Fu
ndi
ng
(not
in
clu
ded
abov
e) ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
9�6
–1�3
Gra
nd
Tot
al, D
iscr
etio
nar
y B
ud
get
Au
thor
ity
.....
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
..1,
257.
61,
217.
71,
170.
41,
098.
11,
117.
31,
137.
51,
158.
61,
182.
71,
207.
71,
233.
81,
259.
81,
285.
85,
681.
811
,851
.6
Mem
oran
du
m, B
ud
get A
uth
orit
y A
dju
sted
for
Infl
atio
n a
nd
Pop
ula
tion
: 5
Sec
uri
ty ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
913�
287
3�2
810�
571
5�2
706�
169
7�2
689�
368
2�3
675�
466
9�0
662�
565
5�8
3,61
8�3
6,96
3�2
Non
-Sec
uri
ty �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��42
7�3
381�
635
9�9
351�
834
8�6
344�
934
1�1
337�
933
5�4
332�
732
9�9
327�
01,
746�
33,
409�
1G
ran
d T
otal
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�1,
340�
51,
254�
91,
170�
41,
067�
01,
054�
61,
042�
21,
030�
41,
020�
11,
010�
81,
001�
799
2�3
982�
75,
364�
610
,372
�31 P
�L� 1
12–2
5, t
he
Bu
dget
Con
trol
Act
of
2011
(B
CA
), es
tabl
ish
ed d
iscr
etio
nar
y ca
ps f
or 2
012–
2021
� T
he
caps
in
clu
ded
sepa
rate
cat
egor
ies
for
“sec
uri
ty”
and
“non
-se
curi
ty” p
rogr
ams
for
2012
an
d 20
13 o
nly
wit
h s
ecu
rity
defi
ned
as
the
Dep
artm
ents
of D
efen
se, H
omel
and
Sec
uri
ty, a
nd
Vet
eran
s A
ffai
rs, t
he
Nat
ion
al N
ucl
ear
Sec
uri
ty
Adm
inis
trat
ion
, th
e In
tell
igen
ce C
omm
un
ity
Man
agem
ent A
ccou
nt,
an
d bu
dget
fun
ctio
n 1
50 fo
r In
tern
atio
nal
Aff
airs
� F
or p
urp
oses
of t
his
pre
sen
tati
on, t
he
secu
rity
an
d n
on-s
ecu
rity
cat
egor
ies
are
incr
ease
d af
ter
2013
bas
ed o
n t
he
grow
th in
th
e ov
eral
l dis
cret
ion
ary
cate
gory
bu
t do
not
refl
ect
spec
ific
poli
cy d
ecis
ion
s�2 T
he
adju
stm
ents
dis
play
ed d
o n
ot i
ncl
ude
dis
aste
r re
lief
pu
rsu
ant
to s
ecti
on 2
51(b
)(2)
(D)
of t
he
BC
A a
s O
MB
is
in t
he
proc
ess
of d
evel
opin
g it
s es
tim
ate
of t
he
10-
year
ave
rage
cal
cula
tion
at
the
tim
e th
e M
SR
is
bein
g pr
inte
d�
OM
B's
est
imat
e of
th
e m
axim
um
adj
ust
men
t fo
r 20
12 w
ill
be t
ran
smit
ted
to t
he
Con
gres
s w
hen
OM
B
subm
its
its
repo
rt in
com
plia
nce
wit
h s
ecti
on 2
51(b
)(2)
(D)(
ii)
of t
he
BC
A�
3 T
he
2012
Bu
dget
in
clu
des
plac
ehol
der
esti
mat
es o
f $5
0 bi
llio
n p
er y
ear
for
Ove
rsea
s C
onti
nge
ncy
Ope
rati
ons
in 2
013
and
beyo
nd�
Th
ese
esti
mat
es d
o n
ot r
eflec
t an
y sp
ecifi
c po
licy
dec
isio
ns�
4 T
he
2012
–202
1 le
vels
refl
ect
the
max
imu
m c
ap a
dju
stm
ent
perm
itte
d ea
ch y
ear
un
der
the
BC
A f
or C
onti
nu
ing
Dis
abil
ity
Rev
iew
s (C
DR
s) a
nd
Red
eter
min
atio
ns
and
for
Hea
lth
Car
e F
rau
d an
d A
buse
Con
trol
(H
CF
AC
)� T
he
2010
an
d 20
11 l
evel
s re
flec
t on
ly t
he
adju
stm
ent
for
CD
Rs
and
Red
eter
min
atio
ns
beca
use
th
e ap
plic
able
ad
just
men
t fo
r H
CF
AC
bec
ame
the
enfo
rcem
ent
base
un
der
the
BC
A�
5 T
otal
s in
clu
de O
vers
eas
Con
tin
gen
cy O
pera
tion
s an
d O
ther
Su
pple
men
tal/E
mer
gen
cy F
un
din
g�
53SUMMARY TABLES 53T
able
S–1
2.
FE
DE
RA
L G
OV
ER
NM
EN
T F
INA
NC
ING
AN
D D
EB
T(I
n b
illi
ons
of d
olla
rs)
Act
ual
2010
Est
imat
e
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Fin
anci
ng:
Un
ified
bu
dget
defi
cit
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
1,29
31,
316
956
648
473
521
583
501
467
498
540
568
Oth
er t
ran
sact
ion
s af
fect
ing
borr
owin
g fr
om t
he
publ
ic:
Ch
ange
s in
fin
anci
al a
sset
s an
d li
abil
itie
s: 1
Ch
ange
in T
reas
ury
ope
rati
ng
cash
bal
ance
����
������
������
������
������
������
���35
–200
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
Net
dis
burs
emen
ts o
f cr
edit
fin
anci
ng
acco
un
ts:
Dir
ect
loan
acc
oun
ts �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
179
110
126
173
148
138
124
107
101
9694
96G
uar
ante
ed lo
an a
ccou
nts
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
213
–6–3
36
64
–1–5
–6–1
5T
rou
bled
Ass
et R
elie
f P
rogr
am (
TA
RP
) e
quit
y pu
rch
ase
acco
un
ts �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��–2
95
–31
21
–1–1
–4–4
–6–7
*N
et p
urc
has
es o
f n
on-F
eder
al s
ecu
riti
es b
y th
e N
atio
nal
Rai
lroa
d R
etir
emen
t In
vest
men
t T
rust
(N
RR
IT)
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
12
–1–1
–1–1
–1–1
–1–1
–1–1
Net
ch
ange
in o
ther
fin
anci
al a
sset
s an
d li
abil
itie
s 2 ���
������
������
������
���–7
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���S
ubt
otal
, ch
ange
s in
fin
anci
al a
sset
s an
d li
abil
itie
s ��
������
������
������
�18
1–7
087
171
151
142
127
105
9584
8081
Sei
gnio
rage
on
coi
ns
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�–*
–*–*
–*–*
–*–*
–*–*
–*–*
–*T
otal
, oth
er t
ran
sact
ion
s af
fect
ing
borr
owin
g fr
om t
he
publ
ic �
����
181
–71
8717
115
014
112
710
594
8379
80T
otal
, req
uir
emen
t to
bor
row
fro
m t
he
publ
ic (
equ
als
chan
ge in
deb
t h
eld
by t
he
publ
ic)
�����
������
������
������
������
������
��1,
474
1,24
51,
043
818
623
662
710
606
562
581
619
649
Ch
ange
s in
Deb
t S
ub
ject
to
Sta
tuto
ry L
imit
atio
n:
Ch
ange
in d
ebt
hel
d by
th
e pu
blic
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���1,
474
1,24
51,
043
818
623
662
710
606
562
581
619
649
Ch
ange
in d
ebt
hel
d by
Gov
ern
men
t ac
cou
nts
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
��17
914
413
316
717
820
722
525
328
027
527
025
7
Ch
ange
in o
ther
fac
tors
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��5
11
21
12
22
22
2T
otal
, ch
ange
in d
ebt
subj
ect
to s
tatu
tory
lim
itat
ion
����
������
������
������
�����
1,65
81,
390
1,17
898
780
386
993
786
184
385
889
190
8
Deb
t S
ub
ject
to
Sta
tuto
ry L
imit
atio
n, E
nd
of
Yea
r:
Deb
t is
sued
by
Tre
asu
ry �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
13,5
0314
,891
16,0
6717
,053
17,8
5518
,723
19,6
5920
,519
21,3
6122
,219
23,1
1024
,018
Adj
ust
men
t fo
r di
scou
nt,
pre
miu
m, a
nd
cove
rage
3 ���
������
������
������
������
������
��8
1011
1314
1516
1718
1818
18
Tot
al, d
ebt
subj
ect
to s
tatu
tory
lim
itat
ion
4 ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
13,5
1114
,901
16,0
7917
,066
17,8
6918
,738
19,6
7520
,536
21,3
7922
,237
23,1
2824
,036
Deb
t O
uts
tan
din
g, E
nd
of
Yea
r:
Gro
ss F
eder
al d
ebt:
5
Deb
t is
sued
by
Tre
asu
ry �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
13,5
0314
,891
16,0
6717
,053
17,8
5518
,723
19,6
5920
,519
21,3
6122
,219
23,1
1024
,018
Deb
t is
sued
by
oth
er a
gen
cies
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
2627
2727
2727
2625
2322
2018
Tot
al, g
ross
Fed
eral
deb
t ��
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
13,5
2914
,918
16,0
9517
,080
17,8
8218
,750
19,6
8520
,544
21,3
8522
,241
23,1
3024
,036
54 MID-SESSION REVIEW54T
able
S–1
2.
FE
DE
RA
L G
OV
ER
NM
EN
T F
INA
NC
ING
AN
D D
EB
T—
Con
tin
ued
(In
bil
lion
s of
dol
lars
)
Act
ual
2010
Est
imat
e
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Hel
d by
:D
ebt
hel
d by
Gov
ern
men
t ac
cou
nts
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��4,
510
4,65
44,
787
4,95
45,
133
5,33
95,
564
5,81
76,
097
6,37
26,
641
6,89
8D
ebt
hel
d by
th
e pu
blic
6 ���
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���9,
019
10,2
6411
,307
12,1
2612
,749
13,4
1114
,121
14,7
2615
,288
15,8
6916
,489
17,1
37
Deb
t H
eld
by
the
Pu
bli
c N
et o
f F
inan
cial
Ass
ets:
Deb
t h
eld
by t
he
publ
ic �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
9,01
910
,264
11,3
0712
,126
12,7
4913
,411
14,1
2114
,726
15,2
8815
,869
16,4
8917
,137
Les
s fi
nan
cial
ass
ets
net
of
liab
ilit
ies:
Tre
asu
ry o
pera
tin
g ca
sh b
alan
ce �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���31
011
011
011
011
011
011
011
011
011
011
011
0
Cre
dit
fin
anci
ng
acco
un
t ba
lan
ces:
Dir
ect
loan
acc
oun
ts �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��66
877
890
41,
077
1,22
51,
363
1,48
61,
593
1,69
41,
790
1,88
41,
980
Gu
aran
teed
loan
acc
oun
ts �
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
–32
–20
–26
–28
–25
–19
–13
–9–1
0–1
5–2
1–3
6
TA
RP
equ
ity
purc
has
e ac
cou
nts
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
����
7782
5152
5352
5046
4235
2829
Gov
ern
men
t-sp
onso
red
ente
rpri
se p
refe
rred
sto
ck �
������
������
������
������
�����
109
124
145
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
Non
-Fed
eral
sec
uri
ties
hel
d by
NR
RIT
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
��23
2423
2221
2019
1817
1614
13O
ther
ass
ets
net
of
liab
ilit
ies
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
–29
–29
–29
–29
–29
–29
–29
–29
–29
–29
–29
–29
Tot
al, fi
nan
cial
ass
ets
net
of
liab
ilit
ies
�����
������
������
������
������
������
������
�����
1,12
51,
069
1,17
71,
357
1,50
71,
649
1,77
61,
881
1,97
62,
059
2,13
92,
219
Deb
t h
eld
by t
he
publ
ic n
et o
f fi
nan
cial
ass
ets
������
������
������
������
������
7,89
49,
194
10,1
3010
,769
11,2
4211
,762
12,3
4512
,845
13,3
1213
,810
14,3
5014
,918
* $5
00 m
illi
on o
r le
ss�
1 A
dec
reas
e in
th
e T
reas
ury
ope
rati
ng
cash
bal
ance
(wh
ich
is a
n a
sset
) is
a m
ean
s of
fin
anci
ng
a de
fici
t an
d th
eref
ore
has
a n
egat
ive
sign
; th
at is
, th
e re
duct
ion
in c
ash
ba
lan
ces
redu
ces
the
amou
nt
that
wou
ld o
ther
wis
e be
bor
row
ed f
rom
th
e pu
blic
� A
n i
ncr
ease
in
ch
ecks
ou
tsta
ndi
ng
(wh
ich
is
a li
abil
ity)
is
also
a m
ean
s of
fin
anci
ng
a de
fici
t an
d th
eref
ore
also
has
a n
egat
ive
sign
�2 In
clu
des
chec
ks o
uts
tan
din
g, a
ccru
ed i
nte
rest
pay
able
on
Tre
asu
ry d
ebt,
un
inve
sted
dep
osit
fu
nd
bala
nce
s, a
lloc
atio
ns
of s
peci
al d
raw
ing
righ
ts, a
nd
oth
er l
iabi
lity
ac
cou
nts
; an
d, a
s an
off
set,
cas
h a
nd
mon
etar
y as
sets
(ot
her
th
an t
he
Tre
asu
ry o
pera
tin
g ca
sh b
alan
ce),
oth
er a
sset
acc
oun
ts, a
nd
profi
t on
sal
e of
gol
d�3 C
onsi
sts
mai
nly
of d
ebt
issu
ed b
y th
e F
eder
al F
inan
cin
g B
ank
(wh
ich
is n
ot s
ubj
ect
to li
mit
), de
bt h
eld
by t
he
Fed
eral
Fin
anci
ng
Ban
k, t
he
un
amor
tize
d di
scou
nt
(les
s pr
emiu
m)
on p
ubl
ic is
sues
of T
reas
ury
not
es a
nd
bon
ds (
oth
er t
han
zer
o-co
upo
n b
onds
), an
d th
e u
nre
aliz
ed d
isco
un
t on
Gov
ern
men
t ac
cou
nt
seri
es s
ecu
riti
es�
4 T
he
stat
uto
ry d
ebt
lim
it i
s $1
4,69
4 bi
llio
n, a
s in
crea
sed
on A
ugu
st 2
, 201
1�
Un
der
curr
ent
law
, th
e li
mit
is
sch
edu
led
to i
ncr
ease
to
$15,
194
bill
ion
on
or
arou
nd
Sep
tem
ber
21, 2
011�
5 T
reas
ury
sec
uri
ties
hel
d by
th
e pu
blic
an
d ze
ro-c
oupo
n b
onds
hel
d by
Gov
ern
men
t ac
cou
nts
are
alm
ost
all
mea
sure
d at
sal
es p
rice
plu
s am
orti
zed
disc
oun
t or
les
s am
orti
zed
prem
ium
� A
gen
cy d
ebt
secu
riti
es a
re a
lmos
t al
l m
easu
red
at f
ace
valu
e�
Tre
asu
ry s
ecu
riti
es i
n t
he
Gov
ern
men
t ac
cou
nt
seri
es a
re o
ther
wis
e m
easu
red
at
face
val
ue
less
un
real
ized
dis
cou
nt
(if
any)
�6 A
t th
e en
d of
201
0, t
he
Fed
eral
Res
erve
Ban
ks h
eld
$811
�7 b
illi
on o
f F
eder
al s
ecu
riti
es a
nd
the
rest
of
the
publ
ic h
eld
$8,2
07�2
bil
lion
� D
ebt
hel
d by
th
e F
eder
al
Res
erve
Ban
ks is
not
est
imat
ed f
or f
utu
re y
ears
�
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENTOFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
WASHINGTON, D.C.