Bringing it Together: Why is it Important to Integrate Academics and Behavior when Thinking about Intensive Intervention

1

2

Introductions Dr. Erica Lembke is an Associate Professor in the Department of

Special Education at the University of Missouri. Dr. Lembke has served as a researcher, teacher, consultant, and faculty member for 19 years in the area of special education.

Nicole Bucka, M.Ed., is an educational consultant providing Response to Intervention (RTI) technical assistance to secondary schools throughout Rhode Island and serves as an NCII coach for Coventry Public Schools.

Gail Chan. Ph.D., BCBA, Senior Researcher at the American Institutes for Research, is a Technical Assistance (TA) Liaison for Michigan and Coordinator of Technical Assistance for the National Center on Intensive Intervention.

Intensive Intervention for students with behavioral and academic needs

The integrated relationship between behavior and academics

Case study: DBI for behavior and academics Resources Questions and Discussion

Agenda

3

National Center on Intensive Intervention

4

NCII’s mission is to build district and school capacity to support implementation of data-based individualization in reading, mathematics, and behavior for students with severe and persistent learning and behavioral needs.

NCII

5

Intensive intervention is designed to address severe and persistent learning or behavior difficulties. Intensive interventions should be—

(a) Driven by data

(b) Characterized by increased intensity (e.g., smaller group, expanded time) and individualization of academic instruction and/or behavioral supports

What is Intensive Intervention?

6

7

Why Intensive Intervention?

Too many students, especially those with disabilities, lack basic skills for reading and mathematics or have serious discipline problems in school

8

Why Do We Need Intensive Intervention?

More Help

Validated programs are not universally effective programs; 3 to 5 percent of students need more help (Fuchs et al., 2008; NCII, 2013).

More Practice

Students with intensive needs often require 10–30 times more practice than peers to learn new information (Gersten et al., 2008).

• Students with disabilities who are not making adequate progress in their current instructional program

• Students who present with very low academic achievement and/or high-intensity or high-frequency behavior problems (typically those with disabilities)

• Students in a tiered intervention system who have not responded to secondary intervention programs delivered with fidelity

Who needs Intensive Intervention?

9

10

NCII’s Approach Data-Based Individualization (DBI): A systematic method for using data to determine when and how to provide more intensive intervention:• Origins in data-based program modification/experimental

teaching were first developed at the University of Minnesota (Deno & Mirkin, 1977).

• It is a process, not a single intervention program or strategy.• It is not a one-time fix, but an ongoing process comprising

intervention and assessment adjusted over time.

NCII’s Approach

11

DBI: Integrating data-based decision

making across academics and social behavior

12

Is DBI the same as RTI?Special education?

Many components of DBI are consistent with elements of special education and tiered service delivery systems including RTI, MTSS,

and PBIS.

Tiered Interventions (RTI, MTSS, PBIS)

• Universal, secondary, and tertiary interventions

• Progress monitoring• Team-based decisions based on

data

Special Education

• Individualized intervention

• Progress monitoring• Team-based decisions

based on data

Bringing it together: The integrated relationship between academics and behavior

13

14

Students with DisabilitiesLow academic achievement

Dropout rates

Arrest rates

• The school completion rate for youth with emotional disturbances (56%) is lower than the rate for all other categories, with the exception of youth with multiple disabilities or intellectual disabilities.

• More than one-third of students with disabilities who dropout have spent a night in jail. Dropouts are 10 percent more likely to have been arrested than youth with disabilities who finished high school.

Students with Disabilities

15

Schools face a set of difficult challenges• E.g., high stakes accountability, providing safe learning environments,

meeting college and career ready expectations

Problem behavior continues to be the primary reason why individuals in our society are excluded from school, community, and work.

School‐wide behavioral systems often provide a culture within which both social and academic success is more likely

Context

16

Integrated Relationship

17

Integrating intensive behavioral intervention into tiered systems is complicated work.

For students with both academic and behavioral needs the relationship is most likely connected.

Students who lack proficiency in academic skills may demonstrate avoidance behaviors as a mechanism to avoid assigned tasks.

Skill deficit

Avoidance behavior

Removal from task

Not all students respond to standardized, evidence-based interventions…

Analysis of student response data from controlled studies suggests that approximately 3-5 percent of students or 20 percent of at-risk students do not respond to standard, evidence-based intervention programs (Fuchs et al., 2012; Wanzek & Vaughn, 2009; Conduct Prevention Problems Research Group, 2002).

• Despite interventions being generally effective for students demonstrating difficulty

• These students may demonstrate BOTH related academic and behavioral needs

Academic & Behavior Intervention

18

Although standardized, evidence-based (i.e., secondary or Tier 2) interventions are effective for many students, they may be insufficient for those with the most intensive integrated academic and behavioral needs.

There is likely no single intervention program(s) that will meet the needs of all students, especially those who have significant and persistent academic and/or behavior challenges.

For some students, individualized, intensive intervention will be necessary to facilitate progress. Student data and guiding principles for intensifying intervention should drive these decisions.

Intervention con’t…

19

20

Data Based Individualization: Behavior and Academics

Where: Middle School Level

What: Data Based Individualization (DBI) in behavior and mathematics within a Tier 3 Intervention

When: 2nd block of math instruction (Tier 3 Intervention) and ‘data meetings’ for DBI

Background

21

Meeting Tools

Describe Intervention, the student, share data (~5 min)

24

Progress Monitoring Graphs

Describe Intervention, the student, share data (~5 min)

Ask Clarifying Questions/Drill Down to Create Hypothesis (5 min)

Fidelity

Analyze Skill Gaps/Instructional Fit

Consider Behavior & Social Emotional

Attendance is consistent

Intervention components are happening w fidelity

While data is inconsistent, work samples and class observation support that student gets concepts

Conflicts before class, struggle with emotional regulation and “letting it go”, distractible

Hypothesis

Student Plan

29

Developing an Individualized Plan Team brainstormed potential

intensification strategies. Plan:

• Modify antecedents (change homeroom or move fluency work to later in period) to prevent “triggering” student.

• Teach emotional awareness and self-regulation explicitly using the Incredible Five-Point Scale.

Team identified a date for next meeting and continue to monitor progress.

Incredible Five Point Scale

30

Follow up

NCII Behavior Resources to Support Implementation

31

32

Find Out What NCII Has to Offer

www.intensiveintervention.org

33

Webinars View archived webinars and look for announcements about the next live webinar:

http://www.intensiveintervention.org/resources/ webinars

• What is an Evidence-Based Behavior Intervention? Choosing and Implementing Behavior Interventions that Work — June 2014 (1:16:20)

• Monitoring Student Progress for Behavioral Interventions — April 2013 (1:10:53)

• Support Systems for Intense Behaviors: Conducting a School-wide Needs Assessment — February 2013 (52:28)

Providing Intensive Intervention using Data-Based Individualization in Behavior — January 2013 (54:49)

34

DBI Training Series Eight training modules focused on components of DBI for academics

and behavior One module focused on

readiness and action planning

Include the following: • Slides and speaker notes

• Activities

• Coaching guides

http://www.intensiveintervention.org/content/dbi-training-series

1. What is a good progress monitoring tool for behavior?

2. Can you recommend some Tier 3 interventions?

Two Frequently Asked Questions for Behavior

35

36

Tools Charts

Behavior Progress MonitoringThe Direct Behavior Rating Overview

37

38

DBR Single-Item Scales (DBR-SIS)

(Chafouleas, Riley-Tillman, & Christ, 2010)

Permission for use granted by authors for educational purposes only.

www.directbehaviorratings.org

39

DBR Standard Behaviors

School Success

Academically Engaged

NondisruptiveRespectful

(Chafouleas, Riley-Tillman, Christ, & Sugai, 2009)

Permission for using DBR form as part of this module granted by authors for educational purposes only.

www.directbehaviorratings.org

40

DBR-DisruptiveDisruptive behavior

This behavior is a student action that interrupts regular school or classroom activity.

Examples include getting out of seat, fidgeting, playing with objects, acting aggressively, and talking or yelling about things that are unrelated to classroom instruction.

(Chafouleas, Riley-Tillman, Christ, & Sugai, 2009)

41

Disruptive ExampleDisruptive

Place a mark along the line that best reflects the percentage of total time the student was disruptive during small-group science instruction today.

Interpretation: The teacher estimated that the student displayed disruptive behavior during 30 percent of small-group science instruction today.

Slide adapted from Chafouleas (2011) with permission.

42

DBR-RespectfulRespectful

Respectful behavior is defined as compliant and polite behavior in response to adult directions and/or peer interactions.

Examples include following teacher directions, initiating prosocial interactions with peers, responding positively to adult requests, and exhibiting verbal or physical disruption without a negative tone or connotation.

Nonexamples include refusing to follow teacher directions, talking back, rolling one’s eyes, exhibiting inappropriate gestures, demonstrating inappropriate language and/or social interactions with adults or peers, and disrupting class time with a negative tone/connotation.

(Chafouleas, Riley-Tillman, Christ, & Sugai, 2009)

43

Respectful ExampleRespectful

Place a mark along the line that best reflects the percentage of total time the student was respectful during whole-class language arts instruction today.

Interpretation: The teacher estimated that the student displayed respectful behavior for 80 percent of whole-class language arts instruction today.

Slide adapted from Chafouleas (2011) with permission.

44

DBR-SIS Standard Item Takeaways All standard item behaviors are clearly defined.

Examples are provided for what constitutes the behavior.

All behaviors can be readily measured, and interpretations for responses are clearly stated.

45

Integrating Target Behavior Into DBR Form Target behavior information is used to develop clear

anchors for ratings.

Anchors are used to gauge whether the behavior was occurring at low, medium, or high levels.

Slide adapted from Chafouleas (2011) with permission.

46

Developing DBR Behavior Definition and AnchorsPreliminary target behavior information can be used to inform the development of anchors.

Operational Definition

Toby’s aggression is defined as any behavior that involves making contact with others in an attempt to injure or harm. This includes punching, hitting, kicking, spitting, scratching, pushing, and biting. This does not include patting on the back or shaking hands.

47

Using Preliminary Data to Develop DBR Anchors for DBIBased on this information, the DBR anchors might correspond with the scale as follows:

48

Direct Behavior Rating

http://www.intensiveintervention.org/resource/monitoring-student-progress-behavioral-interventions-dbi-training-series-module-3

DBR Tools Chart: http://www.intensiveintervention.org/chart/behavioral-progress-monitoring-tools

Intensive Behavior Interventions

49

50

Sample Behavioral Progression

*NCII does not endorse products. We use Check-in/Check-out (CICO) for illustrative purposes only.

51

Implementing Behavioral Strategies: Considerations and Sample Resources

http://www.intensiveintervention.org/implementing-behavioral-strategies-considerations-and-sample-resources

52

Standard Information

Example Term/Definitio

n:

Consequence clause: A clause that identifie

s specific

consequences that will b

e delivered if students do not m

eet

goals and success criteria.

53

.Sections Purpose and overview Type of strategy Behavior addressed Setting Materials Implementation

procedure

54

Implementation ConsiderationsSections Implementation considerations Samples

Example Consideration for Successful Im

plementation:

Consequence clauses that include a form of punishment (e

.g., time out or lo

ss of

privilege) should be accompanied by teaching replacement behaviors and/or strategies

that encourage student demonstration of appropriate or expected behaviors.

55

Intensification StrategiesSections Intensification strategies Additional resources

Example Intensification Strategy: Identify whether the student has a

skill deficit that inhibits his or her ability to demonstrate the appropriate

or expected behavior and to teach the required prerequisite skills for

successful performance.

Questions and Discussion

56

57

Connect to NCII Sign up on our website

intensiveintervention.org to receive our newsletter and announcements

Follow us on YouTube and Twitter

• YouTube Channel: National Center on Intensive Intervention

• Twitter handle: @TheNCII

This webinar was produced under the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Award No. H326Q110005. Celia Rosenquist serves as the project officer.

The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the positions or polices of the U.S. Department of Education. No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education of any product, commodity, service, or enterprise mentioned in this webinar is intended or should be inferred.

Disclaimer

58

Contact US

National Center on Intensive Intervention1000 Thomas Jefferson Street NWWashington, DC 20007-3835

866-577-5787

www.intensiveintervention.org

ncii@air.org@TheNCII

59