bridge program presentation for hice

17
College of Education Bridge Program “Supporting the needs of teachers as they transition from pre to in-service educators Western Oregon University, Oregon Drs. Alicia Wenzel, Cindy Ryan, Carmen Cecada

Upload: wenzela

Post on 04-Jul-2015

279 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Please join us to learn about our attempt to continue to support our pre and in-service teachers.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bridge Program presentation for HICE

College of Education Bridge Program

“Supporting the needs of teachers as they

transition from pre to in-service educators”

Western Oregon University, Oregon

Drs. Alicia Wenzel, Cindy Ryan, Carmen Cecada

Page 2: Bridge Program presentation for HICE

Rationale for Bridge Program

• Teacher attrition has grown by 50 percent over the past fifteen years.

– 46% of all new teachers in the US leave the profession within five years.

– The national teacher turnover rate has risen to 16.8 percent.

– In urban schools it is over 20 percent.

(Kain, 2011; NCES, 2010; NCTAF, 2007, 2010)

Page 3: Bridge Program presentation for HICE

• “…inexperienced teachers often facing assignments in the most challenging

schools because that is where the openings are – but with little support, they burn out in a few

years, feeding the churn of attrition and teacher turnover in these schools.” (NCTAF, 2007).

Page 4: Bridge Program presentation for HICE

Strategies & Approaches

• What strategies & approaches are you using to support your new teachers as they transition from pre-to-inservice?

Page 5: Bridge Program presentation for HICE

Recommendations

• Provide:– Mentoring (Kent et al, 2012; Moir et al, 2009)

– Reflection, community, action, feedback (Hoban & Hastings, 1997)

– Guided facilitative interaction (Shinoharam & Daehler, 2008)

– Collaborative learning (Stoll et al, 2006)

– Professional development (Fulton et al, 2010)

– Opportunity for teachers to discuss… with others in trusted environments (Shinoharam & Daehler, 2008)

– “Overlapping communities” (Artz & Curcio, 2008)

Page 6: Bridge Program presentation for HICE

Framework:Community of Practice

It is an aggregate of people who come together around a mutual engagement. Ways of doing things, ways of talking, beliefs – in short, practices –[that] emerge in the course of this mutual endeavor.

- (Eckert & McConnell-Ginet, 1999, p. 464, emphasis added)

Features needed to be considered a CofP.

a) mutual engagement

b) a jointly negotiated enterprise

c) a shared repertoire - (Wenger, 1998, pp. 76-78).

Page 7: Bridge Program presentation for HICE

-Purpose: to support current COE students, and our alumni, bridging their path from pre to in-service teachers as they gain knowledge and skills to become effective educators.

-Participants: student teachers, alumni in years 0-5

Page 8: Bridge Program presentation for HICE
Page 9: Bridge Program presentation for HICE

Research Qs

• What challenges do novice teachers face as they transition from pre to in-service teachers?

• How can a Community of Practice help reduce negative feelings (ie: stress, frustration, anxiety) related to this transition and their new professional responsibilities, and help promote a collaborative network of professionals?

• What tools, strategies, knowledge, and skills can be incorporated in this Program that may help beginning teachers positively impact student success and increase teacher retention rates?

Page 10: Bridge Program presentation for HICE

Methodology:

• Mixed methods approach blending exploratory and explanatory designs (Creswell, Plano Clark, Gutmann, & Hanson, 2003) with qualitative inquiry

– Likert-scale & open-ended questions on surveys• Surveymonkey

– Constant-comparison method (Strauss & Corbin, 1990)– Observational data, interviews, focus groups

Page 11: Bridge Program presentation for HICE

Findings

• Preliminary evidence from the Program’s first meeting and survey responses indicate that participants find the following to be most beneficial:

a) a non-evaluative CofP

b) additional professional development

c) “overlapping communities”

d) time to reflect and opportunities to take action

Page 12: Bridge Program presentation for HICE

Student teacher response

(Video link to hear interview)http://sharing.theflip.com/session/c4c671317c451fb4d0b048d5acc8cf6f/video/156320731

Page 13: Bridge Program presentation for HICE

Alumni Response• “My name is Sarah. I graduated June 2012 . I have attended the BP as a

student teacher last year and now as a graduate and licensed teacher…”

• Favorite part –”talking with others in the education field…Teaching is an

incredibly complex profession so it is reassuring to know others are experiencing the same challenges and yet still finding ways to successfully reach students…It was interesting (and helpful) to hear about the different paths people were on as teachers.”

• Concerns:• Addressing the individual needs of my students (C&I). • Assessing to determine students' strengths and weaknesses, especially in

reading

• Classroom Management

• Believes the BP can: offer continuing education, links to teaching resources, support, and ideas from others in the field.

Page 14: Bridge Program presentation for HICE

Challenges

• Contact with alumni

• Getting participants

• Funding

• PD needs

Page 15: Bridge Program presentation for HICE

Implications

• Theoretical– New teachers will be better prepared & more effective– New teachers will remain in the profession– Students of new teachers will be more successful

• Research– Gain valuable information from the BP participants;

leads to more areas to explore

• Practice – Strengthen TE Preparation Program areas– Deliver a just, inclusive, well-rounded program

Page 16: Bridge Program presentation for HICE

Where next?

• Plan & host Winter meeting

• New grant for upcoming year –hopefully!

• Collect additional data– More interviews/focus groups

• Expand PD options during meetings

• Eventually, survey school district administrators

• Seek additional $$$

Page 17: Bridge Program presentation for HICE

Resources:• National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Teacher Attrition and Mobility , Results from 2008-

2009 Teacher Follow Up Study. Retrieved November 20, 2012 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010353.pdf.

• Kain, E. (2011). High Teacher Turnover Rates are a Big Problem for America’s Public Schools. Forbes . Retrieved December 1, 2012 from http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2011/03/08/high-teacher-turnover-rates-are-a-big-problem-for-americas-public-schools/.

• Fulton, K.; Doeer, H.; & Britton, T. (2010). STEM Teachers in Professional Learning Communities: A Knowledge Synthesis. National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future and WestEd (NCTAF). Retrieved December 1, 2012 from http://nctaf.org/wp-content/uploads/STEMTeachersinProfessionalLearningCommunities.AKnowledgeSynthesis.pdf.

• Barnes, G.; Crowe, E.; & Schaefer, B. (2007). The Cost of Teacher Turnover in Five School Districts: A Pilot Study. National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future and WestEd (NCTAF). Retrieved December 3, 2012 from http://nctaf.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/NCTAF-Cost-of-Teacher-Turnover-2007-full-report.pdf.

• Moir, E.; Barlin, D.; Gless, J.; & Miles, J. (2009). New Teacher Mentoring: Hopes and Promise for Improving Teacher Effectiveness. Cambridge, MA :Harvard Education Press

• Kent, A..; Green, A.; & Feldman, P. (2012). Fostering the Success of New Teachers: Developing Lead Teachers in a Statewide Teacher Mentoring Program. Current Issues in Education, Vol 15(3). Retrieved December 10, 2012 from http://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/viewFile/988/373.

• Western OR University, COE Bridge Program web page: http://coebridgeprogram.yolasite.com/